Samba network discovery fails through file managers, but works with smbtreeVirtualbox: Find Windows host DNS...
IP addresses from public IP block in my LAN
How did the Venus Express detect lightning?
What is a smasher?
Upside-Down Pyramid Addition...REVERSED!
Something that can be activated/enabled
Find the cheapest shipping option based on item weight
SafeCracker #3 - We've Been Blocked
In Stroustrup's example, what does this colon mean in `return 1 : 2`? It's not a label or ternary operator
60s/70s science fiction novel where a man (after years of trying) finally succeeds to make a coin levitate by sheer concentration
How long would it take for people to notice a mass disappearance?
Why did the Apollo 13 crew extend the LM landing gear?
Why wasn't the Night King naked in S08E03?
What does 'made on' mean here?
How to safely wipe a USB flash drive
29er Road Tire?
US born but as a child of foreign diplomat
Do I add my skill check modifier to the roll of 15 granted by Glibness?
How can I roleplay a follower-type character when I as a player have a leader-type personality?
Causes of bimodal distributions when bootstrapping a meta-analysis model
Where are the "shires" in the UK?
Manager is threatening to grade me poorly if I don't complete the project
Can you Ready a Bard spell to release it after using Battle Magic?
Building a list of products from the elements in another list
Are pressure-treated posts that have been submerged for a few days ruined?
Samba network discovery fails through file managers, but works with smbtree
Virtualbox: Find Windows host DNS name on Debian guestSamba share permission denied user writing file but still showsSamba local master browser cannot be found via broadcastDebian VM Can see other computers on the network but can't connect to the WWWNemo action doesn't work with comand that works in most file managers (as menu services/actions)Linux Mint 18 file manager doesn't show all Windows computersSamba works but can't connect through Windows 10SSO with Samba4 Client and Samba3 Server without Active Directorysecuring a samba server to work with windows 10 and linux at the highest possible smb protocoll with encryptionHow can I get a non-blocking network file share between windows and linux PCs
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}
In file managers (Caja, Nautilus, PCManFM, Dolphin), under Network there is an entry for Windows Network but double-clicking this brings up an empty window with 0 items.
However, smbtree
does list the (Windows and linux) computer hosts online in the local network, their workgroups, and the directories and printers shared from them.
In a file manager, I can use the location address smb://[HOST_IP]/[SHARE_DIRECTORY]
and it works. However, smb://[HOST_IP]
without the directory gives an error:
Error: Failed to retrieve share list from server: Invalid argument. Please select another viewer and try again.
EDIT:
There are many similar bugs reported relating to samba configuration (which may still be the issue here). However newer bug reports suggest it may have to do with samba and Microsoft deprecating old protocols (SMB1): https://dev.solus-project.com/T1223 It is claimed that this newer issue is present on samba versions after 4.6.10.
Note that the computer with this issue is running Fedora 28 and samba 4.8.3. Another computer on the same network which can successfully browse shares is on Ubuntu 16.04 and samba 4.3.11-Ubuntu.
networking samba file-manager
add a comment |
In file managers (Caja, Nautilus, PCManFM, Dolphin), under Network there is an entry for Windows Network but double-clicking this brings up an empty window with 0 items.
However, smbtree
does list the (Windows and linux) computer hosts online in the local network, their workgroups, and the directories and printers shared from them.
In a file manager, I can use the location address smb://[HOST_IP]/[SHARE_DIRECTORY]
and it works. However, smb://[HOST_IP]
without the directory gives an error:
Error: Failed to retrieve share list from server: Invalid argument. Please select another viewer and try again.
EDIT:
There are many similar bugs reported relating to samba configuration (which may still be the issue here). However newer bug reports suggest it may have to do with samba and Microsoft deprecating old protocols (SMB1): https://dev.solus-project.com/T1223 It is claimed that this newer issue is present on samba versions after 4.6.10.
Note that the computer with this issue is running Fedora 28 and samba 4.8.3. Another computer on the same network which can successfully browse shares is on Ubuntu 16.04 and samba 4.3.11-Ubuntu.
networking samba file-manager
add a comment |
In file managers (Caja, Nautilus, PCManFM, Dolphin), under Network there is an entry for Windows Network but double-clicking this brings up an empty window with 0 items.
However, smbtree
does list the (Windows and linux) computer hosts online in the local network, their workgroups, and the directories and printers shared from them.
In a file manager, I can use the location address smb://[HOST_IP]/[SHARE_DIRECTORY]
and it works. However, smb://[HOST_IP]
without the directory gives an error:
Error: Failed to retrieve share list from server: Invalid argument. Please select another viewer and try again.
EDIT:
There are many similar bugs reported relating to samba configuration (which may still be the issue here). However newer bug reports suggest it may have to do with samba and Microsoft deprecating old protocols (SMB1): https://dev.solus-project.com/T1223 It is claimed that this newer issue is present on samba versions after 4.6.10.
Note that the computer with this issue is running Fedora 28 and samba 4.8.3. Another computer on the same network which can successfully browse shares is on Ubuntu 16.04 and samba 4.3.11-Ubuntu.
networking samba file-manager
In file managers (Caja, Nautilus, PCManFM, Dolphin), under Network there is an entry for Windows Network but double-clicking this brings up an empty window with 0 items.
However, smbtree
does list the (Windows and linux) computer hosts online in the local network, their workgroups, and the directories and printers shared from them.
In a file manager, I can use the location address smb://[HOST_IP]/[SHARE_DIRECTORY]
and it works. However, smb://[HOST_IP]
without the directory gives an error:
Error: Failed to retrieve share list from server: Invalid argument. Please select another viewer and try again.
EDIT:
There are many similar bugs reported relating to samba configuration (which may still be the issue here). However newer bug reports suggest it may have to do with samba and Microsoft deprecating old protocols (SMB1): https://dev.solus-project.com/T1223 It is claimed that this newer issue is present on samba versions after 4.6.10.
Note that the computer with this issue is running Fedora 28 and samba 4.8.3. Another computer on the same network which can successfully browse shares is on Ubuntu 16.04 and samba 4.3.11-Ubuntu.
networking samba file-manager
networking samba file-manager
edited Jul 6 '18 at 23:44
adatum
asked Jul 6 '18 at 19:55
adatumadatum
137210
137210
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
Potential issue #1 - resolve order
Sounds like a resolving issue around NMB. It's mentioned here in this thread titled: Nautilus doesn't see network computers... [SOLVED].
non-discovering resolve order
# What naming service and in what order should we use to resolve host names
# to IP addresses
name resolve order = lmhosts host wins bcast
reported to work resolve order
name resolve order = bcast lmhosts host wins
Be sure to restart NMB/SMB services once you've made this change.
Potential issue #2 - client protocol
Researching your issue further, I came across this tip in this AU Q&A titled: Nautilus fails to see shares in 18.04. The tip from there was to change the following:
$ more /etc/samba/smb.conf
workgroup = WORKGROUP
client max protocol = NT1
After making the above changes it's advised to reboot, not simply restart.
As part of this tip, make sure that avahi service is running:
$ sudo service avahi-daemon status
$ sudo service avahi-demon start
Potential issue #3 - firewalld
According to this askfedora.org article titled: fedora 27 network browsing doesnt't work. Why? it's suggested to try disabling firewalld. It may be inhibiting the ports 137-139 which are required for Samba's NMB/SMB services to function properly.
Potential issue #4 - Bug 1513394 with gvfs
Continued searches led to this issue that's still listed as open. The issue, titled: Bug 1513394 - Applications using gvfs are unable to browse SMB shares. It has to do with the package gvfs-smb.
Applications using gvfs are unable to browse SMB shares
These steps can be used to see if the issue afflicts your system.
Steps to Reproduce:
1. nmblookup -M -- -
2. nmblookup -M workgroup
3. smbtree
4. gio list network://
5. gio list smb:///
6. gio list smb://workgroup
If things don't work the results from the steps above will look like this:
1. will return IP address for __MSBROWSE__ special name
2. will return IP address for workgroup master browser
3. will correctly list workgroup, workgroup members and their shares
4. returned items are missing workgroup members
5. will return empty
6. will return an error message "The specified location is not mounted"
If things are working the results will look like this:
1. OK
2. OK
3. OK
4. returned items should contain workgroup members
5. should contain workgroup name
6. should contain workgroup members
It should be noted that there doesn't appear to be a fix yet for this:
For the record, it doesn't work in Fedora 28 and Samba 4.8 either.
Read the comments on the issue to see the rest of the story.
References
- Nautilus doesn't see network computers... [SOLVED]
- Problem viewing network on Nautilus
- Ubuntu Sharing Issue
As mentioned in the link in your comment, I have an entry in journalctl system logs about Kerberos:gvfsd[2694]: Kerberos auth with '[USER]@[WORKGROUP]' (USER][WORKGROUP]) to access '[HOST_IP]' not possible
– adatum
Jul 7 '18 at 0:20
Stopping firewalld with systemctl did not solve the issue.
– adatum
Jul 7 '18 at 0:22
@adatum - interesting, you want to try the kerberos solution to see if it fixes your issue?
– slm♦
Jul 7 '18 at 0:33
What kerberos solution? I'm not familiar with kerberos but read it has to do with Active Directory domains, which I don't think I'm using (how can I check to be sure?).
– adatum
Jul 7 '18 at 0:38
1
@adatum - agreed - I wouldn't do that either. I'd just deal w/ the having to manually browse to shares until it gets resolved.
– slm♦
Jul 7 '18 at 4:33
|
show 4 more comments
The issue is now solved on Fedora 30 (MATE desktop environment) with Samba version 4.10.2 !
Places -> Network now shows Windows workgroups and connected computers. Browsing the shared directories works through the file manager. Everything seems as expected once again.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "106"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f453944%2fsamba-network-discovery-fails-through-file-managers-but-works-with-smbtree%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Potential issue #1 - resolve order
Sounds like a resolving issue around NMB. It's mentioned here in this thread titled: Nautilus doesn't see network computers... [SOLVED].
non-discovering resolve order
# What naming service and in what order should we use to resolve host names
# to IP addresses
name resolve order = lmhosts host wins bcast
reported to work resolve order
name resolve order = bcast lmhosts host wins
Be sure to restart NMB/SMB services once you've made this change.
Potential issue #2 - client protocol
Researching your issue further, I came across this tip in this AU Q&A titled: Nautilus fails to see shares in 18.04. The tip from there was to change the following:
$ more /etc/samba/smb.conf
workgroup = WORKGROUP
client max protocol = NT1
After making the above changes it's advised to reboot, not simply restart.
As part of this tip, make sure that avahi service is running:
$ sudo service avahi-daemon status
$ sudo service avahi-demon start
Potential issue #3 - firewalld
According to this askfedora.org article titled: fedora 27 network browsing doesnt't work. Why? it's suggested to try disabling firewalld. It may be inhibiting the ports 137-139 which are required for Samba's NMB/SMB services to function properly.
Potential issue #4 - Bug 1513394 with gvfs
Continued searches led to this issue that's still listed as open. The issue, titled: Bug 1513394 - Applications using gvfs are unable to browse SMB shares. It has to do with the package gvfs-smb.
Applications using gvfs are unable to browse SMB shares
These steps can be used to see if the issue afflicts your system.
Steps to Reproduce:
1. nmblookup -M -- -
2. nmblookup -M workgroup
3. smbtree
4. gio list network://
5. gio list smb:///
6. gio list smb://workgroup
If things don't work the results from the steps above will look like this:
1. will return IP address for __MSBROWSE__ special name
2. will return IP address for workgroup master browser
3. will correctly list workgroup, workgroup members and their shares
4. returned items are missing workgroup members
5. will return empty
6. will return an error message "The specified location is not mounted"
If things are working the results will look like this:
1. OK
2. OK
3. OK
4. returned items should contain workgroup members
5. should contain workgroup name
6. should contain workgroup members
It should be noted that there doesn't appear to be a fix yet for this:
For the record, it doesn't work in Fedora 28 and Samba 4.8 either.
Read the comments on the issue to see the rest of the story.
References
- Nautilus doesn't see network computers... [SOLVED]
- Problem viewing network on Nautilus
- Ubuntu Sharing Issue
As mentioned in the link in your comment, I have an entry in journalctl system logs about Kerberos:gvfsd[2694]: Kerberos auth with '[USER]@[WORKGROUP]' (USER][WORKGROUP]) to access '[HOST_IP]' not possible
– adatum
Jul 7 '18 at 0:20
Stopping firewalld with systemctl did not solve the issue.
– adatum
Jul 7 '18 at 0:22
@adatum - interesting, you want to try the kerberos solution to see if it fixes your issue?
– slm♦
Jul 7 '18 at 0:33
What kerberos solution? I'm not familiar with kerberos but read it has to do with Active Directory domains, which I don't think I'm using (how can I check to be sure?).
– adatum
Jul 7 '18 at 0:38
1
@adatum - agreed - I wouldn't do that either. I'd just deal w/ the having to manually browse to shares until it gets resolved.
– slm♦
Jul 7 '18 at 4:33
|
show 4 more comments
Potential issue #1 - resolve order
Sounds like a resolving issue around NMB. It's mentioned here in this thread titled: Nautilus doesn't see network computers... [SOLVED].
non-discovering resolve order
# What naming service and in what order should we use to resolve host names
# to IP addresses
name resolve order = lmhosts host wins bcast
reported to work resolve order
name resolve order = bcast lmhosts host wins
Be sure to restart NMB/SMB services once you've made this change.
Potential issue #2 - client protocol
Researching your issue further, I came across this tip in this AU Q&A titled: Nautilus fails to see shares in 18.04. The tip from there was to change the following:
$ more /etc/samba/smb.conf
workgroup = WORKGROUP
client max protocol = NT1
After making the above changes it's advised to reboot, not simply restart.
As part of this tip, make sure that avahi service is running:
$ sudo service avahi-daemon status
$ sudo service avahi-demon start
Potential issue #3 - firewalld
According to this askfedora.org article titled: fedora 27 network browsing doesnt't work. Why? it's suggested to try disabling firewalld. It may be inhibiting the ports 137-139 which are required for Samba's NMB/SMB services to function properly.
Potential issue #4 - Bug 1513394 with gvfs
Continued searches led to this issue that's still listed as open. The issue, titled: Bug 1513394 - Applications using gvfs are unable to browse SMB shares. It has to do with the package gvfs-smb.
Applications using gvfs are unable to browse SMB shares
These steps can be used to see if the issue afflicts your system.
Steps to Reproduce:
1. nmblookup -M -- -
2. nmblookup -M workgroup
3. smbtree
4. gio list network://
5. gio list smb:///
6. gio list smb://workgroup
If things don't work the results from the steps above will look like this:
1. will return IP address for __MSBROWSE__ special name
2. will return IP address for workgroup master browser
3. will correctly list workgroup, workgroup members and their shares
4. returned items are missing workgroup members
5. will return empty
6. will return an error message "The specified location is not mounted"
If things are working the results will look like this:
1. OK
2. OK
3. OK
4. returned items should contain workgroup members
5. should contain workgroup name
6. should contain workgroup members
It should be noted that there doesn't appear to be a fix yet for this:
For the record, it doesn't work in Fedora 28 and Samba 4.8 either.
Read the comments on the issue to see the rest of the story.
References
- Nautilus doesn't see network computers... [SOLVED]
- Problem viewing network on Nautilus
- Ubuntu Sharing Issue
As mentioned in the link in your comment, I have an entry in journalctl system logs about Kerberos:gvfsd[2694]: Kerberos auth with '[USER]@[WORKGROUP]' (USER][WORKGROUP]) to access '[HOST_IP]' not possible
– adatum
Jul 7 '18 at 0:20
Stopping firewalld with systemctl did not solve the issue.
– adatum
Jul 7 '18 at 0:22
@adatum - interesting, you want to try the kerberos solution to see if it fixes your issue?
– slm♦
Jul 7 '18 at 0:33
What kerberos solution? I'm not familiar with kerberos but read it has to do with Active Directory domains, which I don't think I'm using (how can I check to be sure?).
– adatum
Jul 7 '18 at 0:38
1
@adatum - agreed - I wouldn't do that either. I'd just deal w/ the having to manually browse to shares until it gets resolved.
– slm♦
Jul 7 '18 at 4:33
|
show 4 more comments
Potential issue #1 - resolve order
Sounds like a resolving issue around NMB. It's mentioned here in this thread titled: Nautilus doesn't see network computers... [SOLVED].
non-discovering resolve order
# What naming service and in what order should we use to resolve host names
# to IP addresses
name resolve order = lmhosts host wins bcast
reported to work resolve order
name resolve order = bcast lmhosts host wins
Be sure to restart NMB/SMB services once you've made this change.
Potential issue #2 - client protocol
Researching your issue further, I came across this tip in this AU Q&A titled: Nautilus fails to see shares in 18.04. The tip from there was to change the following:
$ more /etc/samba/smb.conf
workgroup = WORKGROUP
client max protocol = NT1
After making the above changes it's advised to reboot, not simply restart.
As part of this tip, make sure that avahi service is running:
$ sudo service avahi-daemon status
$ sudo service avahi-demon start
Potential issue #3 - firewalld
According to this askfedora.org article titled: fedora 27 network browsing doesnt't work. Why? it's suggested to try disabling firewalld. It may be inhibiting the ports 137-139 which are required for Samba's NMB/SMB services to function properly.
Potential issue #4 - Bug 1513394 with gvfs
Continued searches led to this issue that's still listed as open. The issue, titled: Bug 1513394 - Applications using gvfs are unable to browse SMB shares. It has to do with the package gvfs-smb.
Applications using gvfs are unable to browse SMB shares
These steps can be used to see if the issue afflicts your system.
Steps to Reproduce:
1. nmblookup -M -- -
2. nmblookup -M workgroup
3. smbtree
4. gio list network://
5. gio list smb:///
6. gio list smb://workgroup
If things don't work the results from the steps above will look like this:
1. will return IP address for __MSBROWSE__ special name
2. will return IP address for workgroup master browser
3. will correctly list workgroup, workgroup members and their shares
4. returned items are missing workgroup members
5. will return empty
6. will return an error message "The specified location is not mounted"
If things are working the results will look like this:
1. OK
2. OK
3. OK
4. returned items should contain workgroup members
5. should contain workgroup name
6. should contain workgroup members
It should be noted that there doesn't appear to be a fix yet for this:
For the record, it doesn't work in Fedora 28 and Samba 4.8 either.
Read the comments on the issue to see the rest of the story.
References
- Nautilus doesn't see network computers... [SOLVED]
- Problem viewing network on Nautilus
- Ubuntu Sharing Issue
Potential issue #1 - resolve order
Sounds like a resolving issue around NMB. It's mentioned here in this thread titled: Nautilus doesn't see network computers... [SOLVED].
non-discovering resolve order
# What naming service and in what order should we use to resolve host names
# to IP addresses
name resolve order = lmhosts host wins bcast
reported to work resolve order
name resolve order = bcast lmhosts host wins
Be sure to restart NMB/SMB services once you've made this change.
Potential issue #2 - client protocol
Researching your issue further, I came across this tip in this AU Q&A titled: Nautilus fails to see shares in 18.04. The tip from there was to change the following:
$ more /etc/samba/smb.conf
workgroup = WORKGROUP
client max protocol = NT1
After making the above changes it's advised to reboot, not simply restart.
As part of this tip, make sure that avahi service is running:
$ sudo service avahi-daemon status
$ sudo service avahi-demon start
Potential issue #3 - firewalld
According to this askfedora.org article titled: fedora 27 network browsing doesnt't work. Why? it's suggested to try disabling firewalld. It may be inhibiting the ports 137-139 which are required for Samba's NMB/SMB services to function properly.
Potential issue #4 - Bug 1513394 with gvfs
Continued searches led to this issue that's still listed as open. The issue, titled: Bug 1513394 - Applications using gvfs are unable to browse SMB shares. It has to do with the package gvfs-smb.
Applications using gvfs are unable to browse SMB shares
These steps can be used to see if the issue afflicts your system.
Steps to Reproduce:
1. nmblookup -M -- -
2. nmblookup -M workgroup
3. smbtree
4. gio list network://
5. gio list smb:///
6. gio list smb://workgroup
If things don't work the results from the steps above will look like this:
1. will return IP address for __MSBROWSE__ special name
2. will return IP address for workgroup master browser
3. will correctly list workgroup, workgroup members and their shares
4. returned items are missing workgroup members
5. will return empty
6. will return an error message "The specified location is not mounted"
If things are working the results will look like this:
1. OK
2. OK
3. OK
4. returned items should contain workgroup members
5. should contain workgroup name
6. should contain workgroup members
It should be noted that there doesn't appear to be a fix yet for this:
For the record, it doesn't work in Fedora 28 and Samba 4.8 either.
Read the comments on the issue to see the rest of the story.
References
- Nautilus doesn't see network computers... [SOLVED]
- Problem viewing network on Nautilus
- Ubuntu Sharing Issue
edited Jul 7 '18 at 1:35
answered Jul 6 '18 at 21:24
slm♦slm
257k71544693
257k71544693
As mentioned in the link in your comment, I have an entry in journalctl system logs about Kerberos:gvfsd[2694]: Kerberos auth with '[USER]@[WORKGROUP]' (USER][WORKGROUP]) to access '[HOST_IP]' not possible
– adatum
Jul 7 '18 at 0:20
Stopping firewalld with systemctl did not solve the issue.
– adatum
Jul 7 '18 at 0:22
@adatum - interesting, you want to try the kerberos solution to see if it fixes your issue?
– slm♦
Jul 7 '18 at 0:33
What kerberos solution? I'm not familiar with kerberos but read it has to do with Active Directory domains, which I don't think I'm using (how can I check to be sure?).
– adatum
Jul 7 '18 at 0:38
1
@adatum - agreed - I wouldn't do that either. I'd just deal w/ the having to manually browse to shares until it gets resolved.
– slm♦
Jul 7 '18 at 4:33
|
show 4 more comments
As mentioned in the link in your comment, I have an entry in journalctl system logs about Kerberos:gvfsd[2694]: Kerberos auth with '[USER]@[WORKGROUP]' (USER][WORKGROUP]) to access '[HOST_IP]' not possible
– adatum
Jul 7 '18 at 0:20
Stopping firewalld with systemctl did not solve the issue.
– adatum
Jul 7 '18 at 0:22
@adatum - interesting, you want to try the kerberos solution to see if it fixes your issue?
– slm♦
Jul 7 '18 at 0:33
What kerberos solution? I'm not familiar with kerberos but read it has to do with Active Directory domains, which I don't think I'm using (how can I check to be sure?).
– adatum
Jul 7 '18 at 0:38
1
@adatum - agreed - I wouldn't do that either. I'd just deal w/ the having to manually browse to shares until it gets resolved.
– slm♦
Jul 7 '18 at 4:33
As mentioned in the link in your comment, I have an entry in journalctl system logs about Kerberos:
gvfsd[2694]: Kerberos auth with '[USER]@[WORKGROUP]' (USER][WORKGROUP]) to access '[HOST_IP]' not possible
– adatum
Jul 7 '18 at 0:20
As mentioned in the link in your comment, I have an entry in journalctl system logs about Kerberos:
gvfsd[2694]: Kerberos auth with '[USER]@[WORKGROUP]' (USER][WORKGROUP]) to access '[HOST_IP]' not possible
– adatum
Jul 7 '18 at 0:20
Stopping firewalld with systemctl did not solve the issue.
– adatum
Jul 7 '18 at 0:22
Stopping firewalld with systemctl did not solve the issue.
– adatum
Jul 7 '18 at 0:22
@adatum - interesting, you want to try the kerberos solution to see if it fixes your issue?
– slm♦
Jul 7 '18 at 0:33
@adatum - interesting, you want to try the kerberos solution to see if it fixes your issue?
– slm♦
Jul 7 '18 at 0:33
What kerberos solution? I'm not familiar with kerberos but read it has to do with Active Directory domains, which I don't think I'm using (how can I check to be sure?).
– adatum
Jul 7 '18 at 0:38
What kerberos solution? I'm not familiar with kerberos but read it has to do with Active Directory domains, which I don't think I'm using (how can I check to be sure?).
– adatum
Jul 7 '18 at 0:38
1
1
@adatum - agreed - I wouldn't do that either. I'd just deal w/ the having to manually browse to shares until it gets resolved.
– slm♦
Jul 7 '18 at 4:33
@adatum - agreed - I wouldn't do that either. I'd just deal w/ the having to manually browse to shares until it gets resolved.
– slm♦
Jul 7 '18 at 4:33
|
show 4 more comments
The issue is now solved on Fedora 30 (MATE desktop environment) with Samba version 4.10.2 !
Places -> Network now shows Windows workgroups and connected computers. Browsing the shared directories works through the file manager. Everything seems as expected once again.
add a comment |
The issue is now solved on Fedora 30 (MATE desktop environment) with Samba version 4.10.2 !
Places -> Network now shows Windows workgroups and connected computers. Browsing the shared directories works through the file manager. Everything seems as expected once again.
add a comment |
The issue is now solved on Fedora 30 (MATE desktop environment) with Samba version 4.10.2 !
Places -> Network now shows Windows workgroups and connected computers. Browsing the shared directories works through the file manager. Everything seems as expected once again.
The issue is now solved on Fedora 30 (MATE desktop environment) with Samba version 4.10.2 !
Places -> Network now shows Windows workgroups and connected computers. Browsing the shared directories works through the file manager. Everything seems as expected once again.
answered 36 mins ago
adatumadatum
137210
137210
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Unix & Linux Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f453944%2fsamba-network-discovery-fails-through-file-managers-but-works-with-smbtree%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown