Jargon request: “Canonical Form” of a wordArgot vs JargonDoes maths use jargon or metalanguage?What's the...

Certain search in list

Russian word for a male zebra

When would it be advantageous not apply Training Ground's cost reduction?

Check if three arrays contains the same element

Geopandas and QGIS Calulating Different Polygon Area Values?

is it possible for a vehicle to be manufactured witout a catalitic converter

Is it legal for a bar bouncer to confiscate a fake ID

How can I get an unreasonable manager to approve time off?

Overlapping String-Blocks

SQL counting distinct over partition

How to safely destroy (a large quantity of) valid checks?

Group Integers by Originality

Is it possible to have a wealthy country without a middle class?

Why do some employees fill out a W-4 and some don't?

How to hide an urban landmark?

Generate basis elements of the Steenrod algebra

Implement Own Vector Class in C++

Fail to return int value from a function

Is this use of the expression "long past" correct?

Wooden cooking layout

With Ubuntu 18.04, how can I have a hot corner that locks the computer?

Colloquialism for “see you later”

How did old MS-DOS games utilize various graphic cards?

Active low-pass filters --- good to what frequencies?



Jargon request: “Canonical Form” of a word


Argot vs JargonDoes maths use jargon or metalanguage?What's the name of a lexeme's “surface form”?What is the word for a word which can mean anything you want it to?What's the difference between word vectors, word representations and vector embeddings?Сoncept of an attribute usesd by Russian grammariansDoes the single word 'equimolar' have single-word equivalents for less than or greater than?Word for a word that was the ancestor for another word?Term for borrowing an inflected form as an uninflected formIs there distinct jargon for syllabaries depending on their inventory?













3















I have zero experience with linguistics. Some friends told me that my question is one in linguistic, so I decided to give a shot here.



Question



While designing a dictionary, people collect words into it. Naively, each word will occupy an entry, but that is not an efficient way. Instead, we should combine words like 'book' and 'books' into an entry, and probably should name that entry 'book' because the word 'book' is more "reduced" than the work 'books'.



In this case, I would like to say that the 'canonical form' of the word 'books' is 'book'. What is the terminology in linguistics (if any) that is similar to my 'canonical form'? And how do people deal with this dictionary-designing problem? Any related terms will also be appreciated. Thank you in advance!










share|improve this question







New contributor



Student is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
























    3















    I have zero experience with linguistics. Some friends told me that my question is one in linguistic, so I decided to give a shot here.



    Question



    While designing a dictionary, people collect words into it. Naively, each word will occupy an entry, but that is not an efficient way. Instead, we should combine words like 'book' and 'books' into an entry, and probably should name that entry 'book' because the word 'book' is more "reduced" than the work 'books'.



    In this case, I would like to say that the 'canonical form' of the word 'books' is 'book'. What is the terminology in linguistics (if any) that is similar to my 'canonical form'? And how do people deal with this dictionary-designing problem? Any related terms will also be appreciated. Thank you in advance!










    share|improve this question







    New contributor



    Student is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.






















      3












      3








      3








      I have zero experience with linguistics. Some friends told me that my question is one in linguistic, so I decided to give a shot here.



      Question



      While designing a dictionary, people collect words into it. Naively, each word will occupy an entry, but that is not an efficient way. Instead, we should combine words like 'book' and 'books' into an entry, and probably should name that entry 'book' because the word 'book' is more "reduced" than the work 'books'.



      In this case, I would like to say that the 'canonical form' of the word 'books' is 'book'. What is the terminology in linguistics (if any) that is similar to my 'canonical form'? And how do people deal with this dictionary-designing problem? Any related terms will also be appreciated. Thank you in advance!










      share|improve this question







      New contributor



      Student is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.











      I have zero experience with linguistics. Some friends told me that my question is one in linguistic, so I decided to give a shot here.



      Question



      While designing a dictionary, people collect words into it. Naively, each word will occupy an entry, but that is not an efficient way. Instead, we should combine words like 'book' and 'books' into an entry, and probably should name that entry 'book' because the word 'book' is more "reduced" than the work 'books'.



      In this case, I would like to say that the 'canonical form' of the word 'books' is 'book'. What is the terminology in linguistics (if any) that is similar to my 'canonical form'? And how do people deal with this dictionary-designing problem? Any related terms will also be appreciated. Thank you in advance!







      terminology






      share|improve this question







      New contributor



      Student is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.










      share|improve this question







      New contributor



      Student is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.








      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question






      New contributor



      Student is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.








      asked 9 hours ago









      StudentStudent

      1162




      1162




      New contributor



      Student is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.




      New contributor




      Student is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.
























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          6














          The term you are looking for is lemma.

          And yes, indeed most linguists will treat book and books as the same "word" (in the sense of word=lemma) in a dictionary, which is why the term "lemma" is sometimes also referred to as the dictionary form of a word. This applies not only when writing a literal dictionary, but is also the common understanding of the term "word" in theoretical linguistics: "books" and "book" are generally regarded as belonging to the same lexicon entry, where "lexicon" here means not a physical lexicon you keep in your bookshelf, but an abstract idea of a language's word inventory that speakers have intuitions about.

          I don't know exactly what you'd like to know more about how this problem is dealt with; basically, forms of a word which are mere grammatical variants (such as singular vs. plural in the case of nouns, present vs. past tense in the case of verbs, ...) but carry the same core meaning will be treated as the same "word" (in the sense of lemma), while two words of the same form but with a different meaning (such as the word(s) "bow": to bend down vs. something to shoot an arrow with - both words happen to have the same form, but it makes sense to treat them as different words) are treated as belonging to different lemmas. More difficult cases include phenomena like "parliament" (this could have the sense of building or an institution - is this still in some way the same meaning or should these two senses of "parliament" be treated as different entries in a lexicon?), but this is then more a question of where to draw the line between different "meanings", while "lemma" in the sense of "an abstraction over all grammatical variants of a word" is relatively clear-cut.

          BTW: The process of computing the lemma form for a given word (e.g. books -> book), often used in the context of computational linguistics, is called lemmatization.






          share|improve this answer


























            Your Answer








            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "312"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: false,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: null,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });






            Student is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2flinguistics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f31683%2fjargon-request-canonical-form-of-a-word%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            6














            The term you are looking for is lemma.

            And yes, indeed most linguists will treat book and books as the same "word" (in the sense of word=lemma) in a dictionary, which is why the term "lemma" is sometimes also referred to as the dictionary form of a word. This applies not only when writing a literal dictionary, but is also the common understanding of the term "word" in theoretical linguistics: "books" and "book" are generally regarded as belonging to the same lexicon entry, where "lexicon" here means not a physical lexicon you keep in your bookshelf, but an abstract idea of a language's word inventory that speakers have intuitions about.

            I don't know exactly what you'd like to know more about how this problem is dealt with; basically, forms of a word which are mere grammatical variants (such as singular vs. plural in the case of nouns, present vs. past tense in the case of verbs, ...) but carry the same core meaning will be treated as the same "word" (in the sense of lemma), while two words of the same form but with a different meaning (such as the word(s) "bow": to bend down vs. something to shoot an arrow with - both words happen to have the same form, but it makes sense to treat them as different words) are treated as belonging to different lemmas. More difficult cases include phenomena like "parliament" (this could have the sense of building or an institution - is this still in some way the same meaning or should these two senses of "parliament" be treated as different entries in a lexicon?), but this is then more a question of where to draw the line between different "meanings", while "lemma" in the sense of "an abstraction over all grammatical variants of a word" is relatively clear-cut.

            BTW: The process of computing the lemma form for a given word (e.g. books -> book), often used in the context of computational linguistics, is called lemmatization.






            share|improve this answer






























              6














              The term you are looking for is lemma.

              And yes, indeed most linguists will treat book and books as the same "word" (in the sense of word=lemma) in a dictionary, which is why the term "lemma" is sometimes also referred to as the dictionary form of a word. This applies not only when writing a literal dictionary, but is also the common understanding of the term "word" in theoretical linguistics: "books" and "book" are generally regarded as belonging to the same lexicon entry, where "lexicon" here means not a physical lexicon you keep in your bookshelf, but an abstract idea of a language's word inventory that speakers have intuitions about.

              I don't know exactly what you'd like to know more about how this problem is dealt with; basically, forms of a word which are mere grammatical variants (such as singular vs. plural in the case of nouns, present vs. past tense in the case of verbs, ...) but carry the same core meaning will be treated as the same "word" (in the sense of lemma), while two words of the same form but with a different meaning (such as the word(s) "bow": to bend down vs. something to shoot an arrow with - both words happen to have the same form, but it makes sense to treat them as different words) are treated as belonging to different lemmas. More difficult cases include phenomena like "parliament" (this could have the sense of building or an institution - is this still in some way the same meaning or should these two senses of "parliament" be treated as different entries in a lexicon?), but this is then more a question of where to draw the line between different "meanings", while "lemma" in the sense of "an abstraction over all grammatical variants of a word" is relatively clear-cut.

              BTW: The process of computing the lemma form for a given word (e.g. books -> book), often used in the context of computational linguistics, is called lemmatization.






              share|improve this answer




























                6












                6








                6







                The term you are looking for is lemma.

                And yes, indeed most linguists will treat book and books as the same "word" (in the sense of word=lemma) in a dictionary, which is why the term "lemma" is sometimes also referred to as the dictionary form of a word. This applies not only when writing a literal dictionary, but is also the common understanding of the term "word" in theoretical linguistics: "books" and "book" are generally regarded as belonging to the same lexicon entry, where "lexicon" here means not a physical lexicon you keep in your bookshelf, but an abstract idea of a language's word inventory that speakers have intuitions about.

                I don't know exactly what you'd like to know more about how this problem is dealt with; basically, forms of a word which are mere grammatical variants (such as singular vs. plural in the case of nouns, present vs. past tense in the case of verbs, ...) but carry the same core meaning will be treated as the same "word" (in the sense of lemma), while two words of the same form but with a different meaning (such as the word(s) "bow": to bend down vs. something to shoot an arrow with - both words happen to have the same form, but it makes sense to treat them as different words) are treated as belonging to different lemmas. More difficult cases include phenomena like "parliament" (this could have the sense of building or an institution - is this still in some way the same meaning or should these two senses of "parliament" be treated as different entries in a lexicon?), but this is then more a question of where to draw the line between different "meanings", while "lemma" in the sense of "an abstraction over all grammatical variants of a word" is relatively clear-cut.

                BTW: The process of computing the lemma form for a given word (e.g. books -> book), often used in the context of computational linguistics, is called lemmatization.






                share|improve this answer















                The term you are looking for is lemma.

                And yes, indeed most linguists will treat book and books as the same "word" (in the sense of word=lemma) in a dictionary, which is why the term "lemma" is sometimes also referred to as the dictionary form of a word. This applies not only when writing a literal dictionary, but is also the common understanding of the term "word" in theoretical linguistics: "books" and "book" are generally regarded as belonging to the same lexicon entry, where "lexicon" here means not a physical lexicon you keep in your bookshelf, but an abstract idea of a language's word inventory that speakers have intuitions about.

                I don't know exactly what you'd like to know more about how this problem is dealt with; basically, forms of a word which are mere grammatical variants (such as singular vs. plural in the case of nouns, present vs. past tense in the case of verbs, ...) but carry the same core meaning will be treated as the same "word" (in the sense of lemma), while two words of the same form but with a different meaning (such as the word(s) "bow": to bend down vs. something to shoot an arrow with - both words happen to have the same form, but it makes sense to treat them as different words) are treated as belonging to different lemmas. More difficult cases include phenomena like "parliament" (this could have the sense of building or an institution - is this still in some way the same meaning or should these two senses of "parliament" be treated as different entries in a lexicon?), but this is then more a question of where to draw the line between different "meanings", while "lemma" in the sense of "an abstraction over all grammatical variants of a word" is relatively clear-cut.

                BTW: The process of computing the lemma form for a given word (e.g. books -> book), often used in the context of computational linguistics, is called lemmatization.







                share|improve this answer














                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer








                edited 7 hours ago

























                answered 8 hours ago









                lemontreelemontree

                4,88541130




                4,88541130






















                    Student is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










                    draft saved

                    draft discarded


















                    Student is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













                    Student is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












                    Student is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
















                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Linguistics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2flinguistics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f31683%2fjargon-request-canonical-form-of-a-word%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Taj Mahal Inhaltsverzeichnis Aufbau | Geschichte | 350-Jahr-Feier | Heutige Bedeutung | Siehe auch |...

                    Baia Sprie Cuprins Etimologie | Istorie | Demografie | Politică și administrație | Arii naturale...

                    Nicolae Petrescu-Găină Cuprins Biografie | Opera | In memoriam | Varia | Controverse, incertitudini...