“The Fourier transform cannot measure two phases at the same frequency.” Why not?Example of Fourier...
What is the most 'environmentally friendly' way to learn to fly?
Empty proof as standalone
How to avoid a lengthy conversation with someone from the neighborhood I don't share interests with
Being told my "network" isn't PCI compliant. I don't even have a server! Do I have to comply?
How to design an effective polearm-bow hybrid?
“The Fourier transform cannot measure two phases at the same frequency.” Why not?
Who's behind community AMIs on Amazon EC2?
Does a bard know when a character uses their Bardic Inspiration?
Is it uncompelling to continue the story with lower stakes?
Export economy of Mars
Went to a big 4 but got fired for underperformance in a year recently - Now every one thinks I'm pro - How to balance expectations?
Can you shove a friendly creature?
Subverting the essence of fictional and/or religious entities; is it acceptable?
Is there a word that describes people who are extraverted and/or energetic, but uneducated, unintelligent and/or uncreative?
Deflecting lasers with lightsabers
Representation of the concatenation at the type level
HackerRank Implement Queue using two stacks Solution
Is Norway in the Single Market?
Meaning of ギャップ in the following sentence
How long should I wait to plug in my refrigerator after unplugging it?
Why does the friction act on the inward direction when a car makes a turn on a level road?
How to transform a function from f[#1] to f[x]
How do I find version of Intel graphics card drivers installed?
Is it moral to remove/hide certain parts of a photo, as a photographer?
“The Fourier transform cannot measure two phases at the same frequency.” Why not?
Example of Fourier Transform not existing for real-life signals?Fourier Transform Form: two sin components & a phase shift & a magnitude for only one termIntuitive explanation of the Fourier Transform for some of the functionsintuitive interpretation Fourier Transform of two different Rectangular pulsesWhy Fourier transform is not sufficient and we have to use Laplace transform?Does the inverse Fourier transform only produce stationary time signals?Why is not Fourier Transform Good for Non-linear ProcessesPeriodicity of the discrete-time Fourier TransformWhy do the two methods give different answers for the Fourier transform of $Y = cos(omega_0 t + phi)$?How do I obtain the fourier series coefficients for a signal obtained by multiplication of two signals of different frequency?
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}
$begingroup$
I have read that the Fourier transform cannot distinguish components with the same frequency but different phase. For example, in Mathoverflow, or xrayphysics, where I got the title of my question from: "The Fourier transform cannot measure two phases at the same frequency."
Why is this true mathematically?
fourier-transform fourier
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I have read that the Fourier transform cannot distinguish components with the same frequency but different phase. For example, in Mathoverflow, or xrayphysics, where I got the title of my question from: "The Fourier transform cannot measure two phases at the same frequency."
Why is this true mathematically?
fourier-transform fourier
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I have read that the Fourier transform cannot distinguish components with the same frequency but different phase. For example, in Mathoverflow, or xrayphysics, where I got the title of my question from: "The Fourier transform cannot measure two phases at the same frequency."
Why is this true mathematically?
fourier-transform fourier
New contributor
$endgroup$
I have read that the Fourier transform cannot distinguish components with the same frequency but different phase. For example, in Mathoverflow, or xrayphysics, where I got the title of my question from: "The Fourier transform cannot measure two phases at the same frequency."
Why is this true mathematically?
fourier-transform fourier
fourier-transform fourier
New contributor
New contributor
New contributor
asked 8 hours ago
ButternutButternut
182 bronze badges
182 bronze badges
New contributor
New contributor
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
It's because the simultaneous presence of two sinusoidal signals with the same frequency and different phases is actualy equivalent to a single sinusoidal at the same frequency, but, with a new phase and amplitude as follows:
Let the two sinusodial components be summed like this :
$$ x(t) = a cos(omega_0 t + phi) + b cos(omega_0 t + theta) $$
Then from trigionometric manipulations it can be shown that :
$$ x(t) = A cos(omega_0 t + Phi) $$
where
$$A = sqrt{ a^2 + b^2 + 2 a b cos(theta-phi) } $$ and
$$ Phi = tan^{-1}(frac{ a sin(phi) + bsin(theta) } { a cos(phi) + bcos(theta) } ) $$
hence you actually have a single sinusoidal (with a new phase and amplitude), and therefore nothing to distinguish indeed...
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
My brain must be on shut-down because I follow the trig stuff but there's still confusion swirling around.. The OP didn't day they were being added so what justifies the initial step where you add them ? In other words, if we just think of them as two signals where one starts "later" than the other but they're not added, can we distinguish those ? Is it that you have to add them because you can't have two data points at one frequency ? Thanks.
$endgroup$
– mark leeds
2 hours ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "295"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Butternut is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdsp.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f59921%2fthe-fourier-transform-cannot-measure-two-phases-at-the-same-frequency-why-not%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
It's because the simultaneous presence of two sinusoidal signals with the same frequency and different phases is actualy equivalent to a single sinusoidal at the same frequency, but, with a new phase and amplitude as follows:
Let the two sinusodial components be summed like this :
$$ x(t) = a cos(omega_0 t + phi) + b cos(omega_0 t + theta) $$
Then from trigionometric manipulations it can be shown that :
$$ x(t) = A cos(omega_0 t + Phi) $$
where
$$A = sqrt{ a^2 + b^2 + 2 a b cos(theta-phi) } $$ and
$$ Phi = tan^{-1}(frac{ a sin(phi) + bsin(theta) } { a cos(phi) + bcos(theta) } ) $$
hence you actually have a single sinusoidal (with a new phase and amplitude), and therefore nothing to distinguish indeed...
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
My brain must be on shut-down because I follow the trig stuff but there's still confusion swirling around.. The OP didn't day they were being added so what justifies the initial step where you add them ? In other words, if we just think of them as two signals where one starts "later" than the other but they're not added, can we distinguish those ? Is it that you have to add them because you can't have two data points at one frequency ? Thanks.
$endgroup$
– mark leeds
2 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
It's because the simultaneous presence of two sinusoidal signals with the same frequency and different phases is actualy equivalent to a single sinusoidal at the same frequency, but, with a new phase and amplitude as follows:
Let the two sinusodial components be summed like this :
$$ x(t) = a cos(omega_0 t + phi) + b cos(omega_0 t + theta) $$
Then from trigionometric manipulations it can be shown that :
$$ x(t) = A cos(omega_0 t + Phi) $$
where
$$A = sqrt{ a^2 + b^2 + 2 a b cos(theta-phi) } $$ and
$$ Phi = tan^{-1}(frac{ a sin(phi) + bsin(theta) } { a cos(phi) + bcos(theta) } ) $$
hence you actually have a single sinusoidal (with a new phase and amplitude), and therefore nothing to distinguish indeed...
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
My brain must be on shut-down because I follow the trig stuff but there's still confusion swirling around.. The OP didn't day they were being added so what justifies the initial step where you add them ? In other words, if we just think of them as two signals where one starts "later" than the other but they're not added, can we distinguish those ? Is it that you have to add them because you can't have two data points at one frequency ? Thanks.
$endgroup$
– mark leeds
2 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
It's because the simultaneous presence of two sinusoidal signals with the same frequency and different phases is actualy equivalent to a single sinusoidal at the same frequency, but, with a new phase and amplitude as follows:
Let the two sinusodial components be summed like this :
$$ x(t) = a cos(omega_0 t + phi) + b cos(omega_0 t + theta) $$
Then from trigionometric manipulations it can be shown that :
$$ x(t) = A cos(omega_0 t + Phi) $$
where
$$A = sqrt{ a^2 + b^2 + 2 a b cos(theta-phi) } $$ and
$$ Phi = tan^{-1}(frac{ a sin(phi) + bsin(theta) } { a cos(phi) + bcos(theta) } ) $$
hence you actually have a single sinusoidal (with a new phase and amplitude), and therefore nothing to distinguish indeed...
$endgroup$
It's because the simultaneous presence of two sinusoidal signals with the same frequency and different phases is actualy equivalent to a single sinusoidal at the same frequency, but, with a new phase and amplitude as follows:
Let the two sinusodial components be summed like this :
$$ x(t) = a cos(omega_0 t + phi) + b cos(omega_0 t + theta) $$
Then from trigionometric manipulations it can be shown that :
$$ x(t) = A cos(omega_0 t + Phi) $$
where
$$A = sqrt{ a^2 + b^2 + 2 a b cos(theta-phi) } $$ and
$$ Phi = tan^{-1}(frac{ a sin(phi) + bsin(theta) } { a cos(phi) + bcos(theta) } ) $$
hence you actually have a single sinusoidal (with a new phase and amplitude), and therefore nothing to distinguish indeed...
edited 7 hours ago
answered 7 hours ago
Fat32Fat32
17.2k3 gold badges12 silver badges33 bronze badges
17.2k3 gold badges12 silver badges33 bronze badges
$begingroup$
My brain must be on shut-down because I follow the trig stuff but there's still confusion swirling around.. The OP didn't day they were being added so what justifies the initial step where you add them ? In other words, if we just think of them as two signals where one starts "later" than the other but they're not added, can we distinguish those ? Is it that you have to add them because you can't have two data points at one frequency ? Thanks.
$endgroup$
– mark leeds
2 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
My brain must be on shut-down because I follow the trig stuff but there's still confusion swirling around.. The OP didn't day they were being added so what justifies the initial step where you add them ? In other words, if we just think of them as two signals where one starts "later" than the other but they're not added, can we distinguish those ? Is it that you have to add them because you can't have two data points at one frequency ? Thanks.
$endgroup$
– mark leeds
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
My brain must be on shut-down because I follow the trig stuff but there's still confusion swirling around.. The OP didn't day they were being added so what justifies the initial step where you add them ? In other words, if we just think of them as two signals where one starts "later" than the other but they're not added, can we distinguish those ? Is it that you have to add them because you can't have two data points at one frequency ? Thanks.
$endgroup$
– mark leeds
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
My brain must be on shut-down because I follow the trig stuff but there's still confusion swirling around.. The OP didn't day they were being added so what justifies the initial step where you add them ? In other words, if we just think of them as two signals where one starts "later" than the other but they're not added, can we distinguish those ? Is it that you have to add them because you can't have two data points at one frequency ? Thanks.
$endgroup$
– mark leeds
2 hours ago
add a comment |
Butternut is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Butternut is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Butternut is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Butternut is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Signal Processing Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdsp.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f59921%2fthe-fourier-transform-cannot-measure-two-phases-at-the-same-frequency-why-not%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown