What would influence an alien race to map their planet in a way other than the traditional map of the...

Labview vs Matlab??Which one better for image processing?

Difference between types of yeast

Comma Code - Automate the Boring Stuff with Python

A famous scholar sent me an unpublished draft of hers. Then she died. I think her work should be published. What should I do?

What are ATC-side procedures to handle a jammed frequency?

Why is a road bike faster than a city bike with the same effort? & how much faster it can be?

Symbol for function composition like a big sum

Error Message when nothing should be evaluated

Should the average user with no special access rights be worried about SMS-based 2FA being theoretically interceptable?

Is differentiation as a map discontinuous?

Why does this image of Jupiter look so strange?

what should be done first, handling missing data or dealing with data types?

I nicked the tip of the taper on a bottom bracket spindle. Is it still safe?

Why solving a differentiated integral equation might eventually lead to erroneous solutions of the original problem?

I am 15 years old and do not go to a Yeshiva but would like to learn Talmud. A few rabbis near me said they could teach me. How should I start

What is the white pattern on trim wheel for?

Tesla coil and Tesla tower

What should I consider when deciding whether to delay an exam?

Does wetting a beer glass change the foam characteristics?

Quick Yajilin Puzzles: Scatter and Gather

What is the difference between an astronaut in the ISS and a freediver in perfect neutral buoyancy?

Is there a way to hide HTML source code yet keeping it effective?

Co-supervisor comes to the office to help her students, which distracts me

Does the Way of Shadow monk's Shadow Step feature count as a magical ability?



What would influence an alien race to map their planet in a way other than the traditional map of the Earth


What would the consequences be if there was a planet other than Earth, Venus, or Mars that was in the habitable zone?What methods could this alien race use to terraform the Earth so it resembles their homeworld?What would the world map look like if sea levels rose 49 metersIs a bigger planet than Earth with the same density possible?What would the star chart be like if earth had a ring?What would happen if an object on Earth has an equal or greater gravitational force than the Earth?How large can surface gravity anomalies grow before the planet becomes uninhabitable?How plausible are the terrain and land-forms on my fantasy map?How to explain one side of Super Earth is smoother than the other side?How could a planet have one hemisphere way warmer than the other without the planet being tidally locked?






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}







3












$begingroup$


I was looking through a bunch of different ways we can shape a map of the Earth and it got me thinking. We map out planet as a stretched rectangle with NSEW as Up Down Right Left, with the Equator right in the middle. But what would cause a species to prefer a different way of mapping?



Tidal Locking may cause a species to develop a map for each hemisphere. Maybe they would focus more on the positions of extreme weather conditions. What would cause other unique ways of mapping a planet?



Edit: I’m specifically looking for 2D maps not 3D maps like globes.










share|improve this question











$endgroup$














  • $begingroup$
    There are two conventions at work: 1) Importance: Human psychology and egocentrism - the mapmakers put themselves at the center or near the top because other humans recognize those locations as important. 2) The apparent closeness of Geographic North Pole (axis of rotation) and Geomagnetic North Pole, making North an important direction to navigators. Your aliens simply need a different psychology, or different locations for the magnetic poles, or simply don't use compasses.
    $endgroup$
    – user535733
    9 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Back in the old days our maps did not follow those rules, so it is not as if those rules are universal even to men. In any case, remember that any representation of a sphere on a plane is always imperfect (although for small patches of the surface of the sphere it can be good enough). Maybe the aliens have the technology to use spherical maps and need the precission.
    $endgroup$
    – SJuan76
    9 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    At the moment you haven't told us about the specifics of your world, I'm confused about why mapping would come first rather than the world. Are we to assume that your species is space-faring (perhaps exclusively) and is mapping planets other than their own, which would explain the lack of clarity in the parameters of a single planet? If that is the case, then I'd ask you to edit your question to include this detail.
    $endgroup$
    – Measure of despare.
    8 hours ago












  • $begingroup$
    @Measure of despare sorry about the clarity but I’m not looking for an answer for a particular race or planet, but any race of any planet. I’m curious about what may cause such changes in mapping rather than what mapping would look like for a particular species or planet.
    $endgroup$
    – SentiCarter
    6 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    "We map out planet as a stretched rectangle" ... except when we don't. And very often we don't.
    $endgroup$
    – AlexP
    6 hours ago


















3












$begingroup$


I was looking through a bunch of different ways we can shape a map of the Earth and it got me thinking. We map out planet as a stretched rectangle with NSEW as Up Down Right Left, with the Equator right in the middle. But what would cause a species to prefer a different way of mapping?



Tidal Locking may cause a species to develop a map for each hemisphere. Maybe they would focus more on the positions of extreme weather conditions. What would cause other unique ways of mapping a planet?



Edit: I’m specifically looking for 2D maps not 3D maps like globes.










share|improve this question











$endgroup$














  • $begingroup$
    There are two conventions at work: 1) Importance: Human psychology and egocentrism - the mapmakers put themselves at the center or near the top because other humans recognize those locations as important. 2) The apparent closeness of Geographic North Pole (axis of rotation) and Geomagnetic North Pole, making North an important direction to navigators. Your aliens simply need a different psychology, or different locations for the magnetic poles, or simply don't use compasses.
    $endgroup$
    – user535733
    9 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Back in the old days our maps did not follow those rules, so it is not as if those rules are universal even to men. In any case, remember that any representation of a sphere on a plane is always imperfect (although for small patches of the surface of the sphere it can be good enough). Maybe the aliens have the technology to use spherical maps and need the precission.
    $endgroup$
    – SJuan76
    9 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    At the moment you haven't told us about the specifics of your world, I'm confused about why mapping would come first rather than the world. Are we to assume that your species is space-faring (perhaps exclusively) and is mapping planets other than their own, which would explain the lack of clarity in the parameters of a single planet? If that is the case, then I'd ask you to edit your question to include this detail.
    $endgroup$
    – Measure of despare.
    8 hours ago












  • $begingroup$
    @Measure of despare sorry about the clarity but I’m not looking for an answer for a particular race or planet, but any race of any planet. I’m curious about what may cause such changes in mapping rather than what mapping would look like for a particular species or planet.
    $endgroup$
    – SentiCarter
    6 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    "We map out planet as a stretched rectangle" ... except when we don't. And very often we don't.
    $endgroup$
    – AlexP
    6 hours ago














3












3








3





$begingroup$


I was looking through a bunch of different ways we can shape a map of the Earth and it got me thinking. We map out planet as a stretched rectangle with NSEW as Up Down Right Left, with the Equator right in the middle. But what would cause a species to prefer a different way of mapping?



Tidal Locking may cause a species to develop a map for each hemisphere. Maybe they would focus more on the positions of extreme weather conditions. What would cause other unique ways of mapping a planet?



Edit: I’m specifically looking for 2D maps not 3D maps like globes.










share|improve this question











$endgroup$




I was looking through a bunch of different ways we can shape a map of the Earth and it got me thinking. We map out planet as a stretched rectangle with NSEW as Up Down Right Left, with the Equator right in the middle. But what would cause a species to prefer a different way of mapping?



Tidal Locking may cause a species to develop a map for each hemisphere. Maybe they would focus more on the positions of extreme weather conditions. What would cause other unique ways of mapping a planet?



Edit: I’m specifically looking for 2D maps not 3D maps like globes.







planets map-making






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 5 hours ago







SentiCarter

















asked 10 hours ago









SentiCarterSentiCarter

3588 bronze badges




3588 bronze badges















  • $begingroup$
    There are two conventions at work: 1) Importance: Human psychology and egocentrism - the mapmakers put themselves at the center or near the top because other humans recognize those locations as important. 2) The apparent closeness of Geographic North Pole (axis of rotation) and Geomagnetic North Pole, making North an important direction to navigators. Your aliens simply need a different psychology, or different locations for the magnetic poles, or simply don't use compasses.
    $endgroup$
    – user535733
    9 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Back in the old days our maps did not follow those rules, so it is not as if those rules are universal even to men. In any case, remember that any representation of a sphere on a plane is always imperfect (although for small patches of the surface of the sphere it can be good enough). Maybe the aliens have the technology to use spherical maps and need the precission.
    $endgroup$
    – SJuan76
    9 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    At the moment you haven't told us about the specifics of your world, I'm confused about why mapping would come first rather than the world. Are we to assume that your species is space-faring (perhaps exclusively) and is mapping planets other than their own, which would explain the lack of clarity in the parameters of a single planet? If that is the case, then I'd ask you to edit your question to include this detail.
    $endgroup$
    – Measure of despare.
    8 hours ago












  • $begingroup$
    @Measure of despare sorry about the clarity but I’m not looking for an answer for a particular race or planet, but any race of any planet. I’m curious about what may cause such changes in mapping rather than what mapping would look like for a particular species or planet.
    $endgroup$
    – SentiCarter
    6 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    "We map out planet as a stretched rectangle" ... except when we don't. And very often we don't.
    $endgroup$
    – AlexP
    6 hours ago


















  • $begingroup$
    There are two conventions at work: 1) Importance: Human psychology and egocentrism - the mapmakers put themselves at the center or near the top because other humans recognize those locations as important. 2) The apparent closeness of Geographic North Pole (axis of rotation) and Geomagnetic North Pole, making North an important direction to navigators. Your aliens simply need a different psychology, or different locations for the magnetic poles, or simply don't use compasses.
    $endgroup$
    – user535733
    9 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Back in the old days our maps did not follow those rules, so it is not as if those rules are universal even to men. In any case, remember that any representation of a sphere on a plane is always imperfect (although for small patches of the surface of the sphere it can be good enough). Maybe the aliens have the technology to use spherical maps and need the precission.
    $endgroup$
    – SJuan76
    9 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    At the moment you haven't told us about the specifics of your world, I'm confused about why mapping would come first rather than the world. Are we to assume that your species is space-faring (perhaps exclusively) and is mapping planets other than their own, which would explain the lack of clarity in the parameters of a single planet? If that is the case, then I'd ask you to edit your question to include this detail.
    $endgroup$
    – Measure of despare.
    8 hours ago












  • $begingroup$
    @Measure of despare sorry about the clarity but I’m not looking for an answer for a particular race or planet, but any race of any planet. I’m curious about what may cause such changes in mapping rather than what mapping would look like for a particular species or planet.
    $endgroup$
    – SentiCarter
    6 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    "We map out planet as a stretched rectangle" ... except when we don't. And very often we don't.
    $endgroup$
    – AlexP
    6 hours ago
















$begingroup$
There are two conventions at work: 1) Importance: Human psychology and egocentrism - the mapmakers put themselves at the center or near the top because other humans recognize those locations as important. 2) The apparent closeness of Geographic North Pole (axis of rotation) and Geomagnetic North Pole, making North an important direction to navigators. Your aliens simply need a different psychology, or different locations for the magnetic poles, or simply don't use compasses.
$endgroup$
– user535733
9 hours ago




$begingroup$
There are two conventions at work: 1) Importance: Human psychology and egocentrism - the mapmakers put themselves at the center or near the top because other humans recognize those locations as important. 2) The apparent closeness of Geographic North Pole (axis of rotation) and Geomagnetic North Pole, making North an important direction to navigators. Your aliens simply need a different psychology, or different locations for the magnetic poles, or simply don't use compasses.
$endgroup$
– user535733
9 hours ago




1




1




$begingroup$
Back in the old days our maps did not follow those rules, so it is not as if those rules are universal even to men. In any case, remember that any representation of a sphere on a plane is always imperfect (although for small patches of the surface of the sphere it can be good enough). Maybe the aliens have the technology to use spherical maps and need the precission.
$endgroup$
– SJuan76
9 hours ago




$begingroup$
Back in the old days our maps did not follow those rules, so it is not as if those rules are universal even to men. In any case, remember that any representation of a sphere on a plane is always imperfect (although for small patches of the surface of the sphere it can be good enough). Maybe the aliens have the technology to use spherical maps and need the precission.
$endgroup$
– SJuan76
9 hours ago












$begingroup$
At the moment you haven't told us about the specifics of your world, I'm confused about why mapping would come first rather than the world. Are we to assume that your species is space-faring (perhaps exclusively) and is mapping planets other than their own, which would explain the lack of clarity in the parameters of a single planet? If that is the case, then I'd ask you to edit your question to include this detail.
$endgroup$
– Measure of despare.
8 hours ago






$begingroup$
At the moment you haven't told us about the specifics of your world, I'm confused about why mapping would come first rather than the world. Are we to assume that your species is space-faring (perhaps exclusively) and is mapping planets other than their own, which would explain the lack of clarity in the parameters of a single planet? If that is the case, then I'd ask you to edit your question to include this detail.
$endgroup$
– Measure of despare.
8 hours ago














$begingroup$
@Measure of despare sorry about the clarity but I’m not looking for an answer for a particular race or planet, but any race of any planet. I’m curious about what may cause such changes in mapping rather than what mapping would look like for a particular species or planet.
$endgroup$
– SentiCarter
6 hours ago




$begingroup$
@Measure of despare sorry about the clarity but I’m not looking for an answer for a particular race or planet, but any race of any planet. I’m curious about what may cause such changes in mapping rather than what mapping would look like for a particular species or planet.
$endgroup$
– SentiCarter
6 hours ago




1




1




$begingroup$
"We map out planet as a stretched rectangle" ... except when we don't. And very often we don't.
$endgroup$
– AlexP
6 hours ago




$begingroup$
"We map out planet as a stretched rectangle" ... except when we don't. And very often we don't.
$endgroup$
– AlexP
6 hours ago










6 Answers
6






active

oldest

votes


















7














$begingroup$

It's very much a matter of what information they want to display in their primary 3d to 2d projection.



The Mercator projection that everyone is so familiar with is simply designed so that lines of latitude are straight horizontal. This makes ocean navigation easier as the important factor was knowing how many degrees north or south you needed to be.




The Mercator projection (/mərˈkeɪtər/) is a cylindrical map projection presented by the Flemish geographer and cartographer Gerardus Mercator in 1569. It became the standard map projection for navigation because of its unique property of representing any course of constant bearing as a straight segment.




Any minor details like distances or areas of countries can be neglected, that's not what this particular map projection is for. The reason north is at the top and the prime meridian goes through Britain is because the British cartographers made the best maps and they chose such a layout. There's also McArthur's corrective Mercator projection that puts Australia top centre and it looks really strange to the rest of us.



If you go far enough back in history, you'll find maps with Jerusalem at the centre, but they're not particularly useful.



What you have to do is define what it is that your map is supposed to show accurately and what can be sacrificed in turn.



Say that the primary empire of the early industrial period was landlocked, now ocean navigation isn't a defining factor but rather land distances from the capital. Now you have a map that has the imperial capital in the centre and uses something like Azimuthal equidistant projection which preserves the distances from the centre.




The azimuthal equidistant projection is an azimuthal map projection. It has the useful properties that all points on the map are at proportionally correct distances from the center point, and that all points on the map are at the correct azimuth (direction) from the center point. A useful application for this type of projection is a polar projection which shows all meridians (lines of longitude) as straight, with distances from the pole represented correctly.




This map isn't great for travelling to or from anywhere other than the centre point, but as they say, all roads lead away from Ankh-Morpork*. Perhaps regional cities would have their own local map with the city in the centre allowing local navigation.





*Sometimes people go along them the wrong way.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$















  • $begingroup$
    Indeed, there's at least a few medieval maps out there that plunk Jerusalem right in the middle, for a real world example
    $endgroup$
    – Pingcode
    2 hours ago



















3














$begingroup$

The aliens know some mathematics that we don't.



In the question, there is mention of a particular rectangular projection, best known as the Mercator projection. However, there are many other ways we Earth people have figured out for projecting a sphere onto something flat, including conic, conformal, gnomonic. There is a decent article at Wikipedia.



Each of these projection the techniques requires an understanding of some type of geometry, trigonometry, or related areas of mathematics, and there could easily be other possible projections we have yet to discover, but the aliens have known for a long time. Their maps won't be radically different as a result, but perhaps just different enough to handwaved it into your story.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$























    3














    $begingroup$

    We project our world on a bi-dimensional surface because we learned to make flat surfaces well before making spheres.



    And don't forget that you can easily cut a flat surface in smaller pieces, while cutting down a sphere is more difficult. In other words, if you don't need the whole world but just the 1000 km around the Republic of San Marino, it is more easy to do it on a flat surface than on a sphere.



    Moreover, flat surfaces can be more easily carried around and stored. A map can be rolled up, a ball will stay a ball.



    Change those factors above and you will have a different outcome with respect to map making.






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$















    • $begingroup$
      I'm sure a ball can be rolled up, too, just deflate it. Or if it's solid, it can be rolled up into the fourth dimension.
      $endgroup$
      – Yellow Sky
      8 hours ago






    • 2




      $begingroup$
      @YellowSky, we learned to use bark and skin way before we learned how to make an inflatable ball. And we still don't know how to roll something in the 4th dimension. If you do, please give me the instructions to do it.
      $endgroup$
      – L.Dutch
      8 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      Aren't we talking about aliens here? They may well be able to do that. Besides, we the people of Earth, have known how to roll things into the 4th dimension for quite a long time already, we just cannot practically do it, yet. The mathematical theory of four-dimensional space was precisely formalized in 1854 by Bernhard Riemann. The instructions are in that Wikipedia article.
      $endgroup$
      – Yellow Sky
      8 hours ago








    • 1




      $begingroup$
      @YellowSky In the context of this answer, "have a mathematical representation for X" and "know how to do X" are not remotely the same thing.
      $endgroup$
      – Geoffrey Brent
      1 hour ago



















    1














    $begingroup$

    If you're dealing with cartological evolution, the answer is "pretty much nothing."



    I suspect all species would develop maps in the following way:




    1. They sit down with a stick and some rocks, draw the local river, put some rocks in to mark the villages, then in their own language intone the words, "grog, you take bugga and clobber dis place. Me take Wherk and pound over der."


    2. A little while later, something akin to paper/vellum/papyrus is invented, and the conversation goes something like, "Hermicules, thou taketh thy holy troops and stand atop the Hilltop of Crahakia the Elder and then shalt thou count to three, no more, no less. Three shall be the number thou shalt count, and the number of the counting shall be three. Four shalt thou not count, nor either count thou two, excepting that thou then proceed to three. Five is right out! Once the number three, being the third number, be reached, then thou shalt assault the city in the name of Daiphus and bring salvation to the wicked!"1


    3. A little later, someone discovers a rock, or a pin, or something on a leaf, that happens to point in a useful direction in a predictable way. Such a person might suggest that direction to be "Gorp!" Thereafter, the "top" of the page upon which the battle plan holy consecration is thus inscribed is known as "Gorp!"2


    4. And sometime after that subways are invented and some genius figures out that actually knowing the geography involved with cartography isn't actually relevant or practical when it comes to dropping down to the corner to buy a box of smokes.



    My point is, cartography inevitably starts with a 2-D rendering of the local geography and becomes more complex as more data needs to be represented, but there are only so many ways simple geography (the local river, hill, and village) can be represented unless your aliens don't have eyes.



    An advanced species may have a reason for not using what Humans use today, but how they came to the threshold of that decision is, IMHO, highly unlikely to be any different than Humanity experienced.



    Remember, knowledge is a pyramid, ever growing in size, and your aliens are at any given moment standing atop their pyramid. However, in the beginning, that pyramid is very small, and that means very little variation compared to any other sapient species.



    IMHO.





    1My undying thanks to Monty Python for one of the most enduring and funniest moments of dialog in history.



    2It's worth noting that step #3 might come before step #2. It's a bit wishy-washy in the middle.






    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$























      1














      $begingroup$

      As others pointed out, there are some well-explored ways to project a sphere onto a map sheet, including ones to preserve angles (e.g. Mercator) or to perserve areas (e.g. Gall-Peters). Each has advantages and drawbacks for various purposes, and there is mathematical proof that there is projection to perserve angles, distances, and areas at the same time.




      • Have your aliens use an azimuthal equidistant projection centered on a holy city or capital. Then have some adventure set on the opposite end of the world, near the point which becomes the outer rim of the map. (The usual maps have two such points, but they are at the poles where few people live.)

      • Have them use a Peirce projection.


      But in both cases you would have a flat map and one would have to know the continents to recognize how they are distorted.






      share|improve this answer









      $endgroup$























        0














        $begingroup$

        The geography of the alien planet can be very different from ours. Imagine a water world with just a single continent centered on one of the poles, like our Antarctica, with no other continents, not even islands. In this case, they wouldn't just need to map the other water-only hemisphere, and their maps will be of round shape with the pole in the center.



        Or the planet can have the shape not near-spheric like the Earth's, but of irregular shape, for example it had a heavy collision with another object that deformed it. In this case, the projection of the planet's shape on a flat surface can take rather weird shapes, the ones that cannot fit effectively into a rectangle, or the planet can have even not two, but three or more "hemispheres", so where we have the map of two round hemispheres, their map will have four triangular ones.



        We can go on imagining different geographies and different planet shapes with their respective maps. I'd love to see a map of a planet which has tunnels going through the core as wide as to allow the aliens to live not on the outer surface of the planet, but on the inner surfaces of the tunnels, too.






        share|improve this answer








        New contributor



        Yellow Sky is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.





        $endgroup$


















          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "579"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/"u003ecc by-sa 4.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });















          draft saved

          draft discarded
















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f156714%2fwhat-would-influence-an-alien-race-to-map-their-planet-in-a-way-other-than-the-t%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          6 Answers
          6






          active

          oldest

          votes








          6 Answers
          6






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          7














          $begingroup$

          It's very much a matter of what information they want to display in their primary 3d to 2d projection.



          The Mercator projection that everyone is so familiar with is simply designed so that lines of latitude are straight horizontal. This makes ocean navigation easier as the important factor was knowing how many degrees north or south you needed to be.




          The Mercator projection (/mərˈkeɪtər/) is a cylindrical map projection presented by the Flemish geographer and cartographer Gerardus Mercator in 1569. It became the standard map projection for navigation because of its unique property of representing any course of constant bearing as a straight segment.




          Any minor details like distances or areas of countries can be neglected, that's not what this particular map projection is for. The reason north is at the top and the prime meridian goes through Britain is because the British cartographers made the best maps and they chose such a layout. There's also McArthur's corrective Mercator projection that puts Australia top centre and it looks really strange to the rest of us.



          If you go far enough back in history, you'll find maps with Jerusalem at the centre, but they're not particularly useful.



          What you have to do is define what it is that your map is supposed to show accurately and what can be sacrificed in turn.



          Say that the primary empire of the early industrial period was landlocked, now ocean navigation isn't a defining factor but rather land distances from the capital. Now you have a map that has the imperial capital in the centre and uses something like Azimuthal equidistant projection which preserves the distances from the centre.




          The azimuthal equidistant projection is an azimuthal map projection. It has the useful properties that all points on the map are at proportionally correct distances from the center point, and that all points on the map are at the correct azimuth (direction) from the center point. A useful application for this type of projection is a polar projection which shows all meridians (lines of longitude) as straight, with distances from the pole represented correctly.




          This map isn't great for travelling to or from anywhere other than the centre point, but as they say, all roads lead away from Ankh-Morpork*. Perhaps regional cities would have their own local map with the city in the centre allowing local navigation.





          *Sometimes people go along them the wrong way.






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$















          • $begingroup$
            Indeed, there's at least a few medieval maps out there that plunk Jerusalem right in the middle, for a real world example
            $endgroup$
            – Pingcode
            2 hours ago
















          7














          $begingroup$

          It's very much a matter of what information they want to display in their primary 3d to 2d projection.



          The Mercator projection that everyone is so familiar with is simply designed so that lines of latitude are straight horizontal. This makes ocean navigation easier as the important factor was knowing how many degrees north or south you needed to be.




          The Mercator projection (/mərˈkeɪtər/) is a cylindrical map projection presented by the Flemish geographer and cartographer Gerardus Mercator in 1569. It became the standard map projection for navigation because of its unique property of representing any course of constant bearing as a straight segment.




          Any minor details like distances or areas of countries can be neglected, that's not what this particular map projection is for. The reason north is at the top and the prime meridian goes through Britain is because the British cartographers made the best maps and they chose such a layout. There's also McArthur's corrective Mercator projection that puts Australia top centre and it looks really strange to the rest of us.



          If you go far enough back in history, you'll find maps with Jerusalem at the centre, but they're not particularly useful.



          What you have to do is define what it is that your map is supposed to show accurately and what can be sacrificed in turn.



          Say that the primary empire of the early industrial period was landlocked, now ocean navigation isn't a defining factor but rather land distances from the capital. Now you have a map that has the imperial capital in the centre and uses something like Azimuthal equidistant projection which preserves the distances from the centre.




          The azimuthal equidistant projection is an azimuthal map projection. It has the useful properties that all points on the map are at proportionally correct distances from the center point, and that all points on the map are at the correct azimuth (direction) from the center point. A useful application for this type of projection is a polar projection which shows all meridians (lines of longitude) as straight, with distances from the pole represented correctly.




          This map isn't great for travelling to or from anywhere other than the centre point, but as they say, all roads lead away from Ankh-Morpork*. Perhaps regional cities would have their own local map with the city in the centre allowing local navigation.





          *Sometimes people go along them the wrong way.






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$















          • $begingroup$
            Indeed, there's at least a few medieval maps out there that plunk Jerusalem right in the middle, for a real world example
            $endgroup$
            – Pingcode
            2 hours ago














          7














          7










          7







          $begingroup$

          It's very much a matter of what information they want to display in their primary 3d to 2d projection.



          The Mercator projection that everyone is so familiar with is simply designed so that lines of latitude are straight horizontal. This makes ocean navigation easier as the important factor was knowing how many degrees north or south you needed to be.




          The Mercator projection (/mərˈkeɪtər/) is a cylindrical map projection presented by the Flemish geographer and cartographer Gerardus Mercator in 1569. It became the standard map projection for navigation because of its unique property of representing any course of constant bearing as a straight segment.




          Any minor details like distances or areas of countries can be neglected, that's not what this particular map projection is for. The reason north is at the top and the prime meridian goes through Britain is because the British cartographers made the best maps and they chose such a layout. There's also McArthur's corrective Mercator projection that puts Australia top centre and it looks really strange to the rest of us.



          If you go far enough back in history, you'll find maps with Jerusalem at the centre, but they're not particularly useful.



          What you have to do is define what it is that your map is supposed to show accurately and what can be sacrificed in turn.



          Say that the primary empire of the early industrial period was landlocked, now ocean navigation isn't a defining factor but rather land distances from the capital. Now you have a map that has the imperial capital in the centre and uses something like Azimuthal equidistant projection which preserves the distances from the centre.




          The azimuthal equidistant projection is an azimuthal map projection. It has the useful properties that all points on the map are at proportionally correct distances from the center point, and that all points on the map are at the correct azimuth (direction) from the center point. A useful application for this type of projection is a polar projection which shows all meridians (lines of longitude) as straight, with distances from the pole represented correctly.




          This map isn't great for travelling to or from anywhere other than the centre point, but as they say, all roads lead away from Ankh-Morpork*. Perhaps regional cities would have their own local map with the city in the centre allowing local navigation.





          *Sometimes people go along them the wrong way.






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$



          It's very much a matter of what information they want to display in their primary 3d to 2d projection.



          The Mercator projection that everyone is so familiar with is simply designed so that lines of latitude are straight horizontal. This makes ocean navigation easier as the important factor was knowing how many degrees north or south you needed to be.




          The Mercator projection (/mərˈkeɪtər/) is a cylindrical map projection presented by the Flemish geographer and cartographer Gerardus Mercator in 1569. It became the standard map projection for navigation because of its unique property of representing any course of constant bearing as a straight segment.




          Any minor details like distances or areas of countries can be neglected, that's not what this particular map projection is for. The reason north is at the top and the prime meridian goes through Britain is because the British cartographers made the best maps and they chose such a layout. There's also McArthur's corrective Mercator projection that puts Australia top centre and it looks really strange to the rest of us.



          If you go far enough back in history, you'll find maps with Jerusalem at the centre, but they're not particularly useful.



          What you have to do is define what it is that your map is supposed to show accurately and what can be sacrificed in turn.



          Say that the primary empire of the early industrial period was landlocked, now ocean navigation isn't a defining factor but rather land distances from the capital. Now you have a map that has the imperial capital in the centre and uses something like Azimuthal equidistant projection which preserves the distances from the centre.




          The azimuthal equidistant projection is an azimuthal map projection. It has the useful properties that all points on the map are at proportionally correct distances from the center point, and that all points on the map are at the correct azimuth (direction) from the center point. A useful application for this type of projection is a polar projection which shows all meridians (lines of longitude) as straight, with distances from the pole represented correctly.




          This map isn't great for travelling to or from anywhere other than the centre point, but as they say, all roads lead away from Ankh-Morpork*. Perhaps regional cities would have their own local map with the city in the centre allowing local navigation.





          *Sometimes people go along them the wrong way.







          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited 7 hours ago

























          answered 8 hours ago









          SeparatrixSeparatrix

          93.6k33 gold badges217 silver badges363 bronze badges




          93.6k33 gold badges217 silver badges363 bronze badges















          • $begingroup$
            Indeed, there's at least a few medieval maps out there that plunk Jerusalem right in the middle, for a real world example
            $endgroup$
            – Pingcode
            2 hours ago


















          • $begingroup$
            Indeed, there's at least a few medieval maps out there that plunk Jerusalem right in the middle, for a real world example
            $endgroup$
            – Pingcode
            2 hours ago
















          $begingroup$
          Indeed, there's at least a few medieval maps out there that plunk Jerusalem right in the middle, for a real world example
          $endgroup$
          – Pingcode
          2 hours ago




          $begingroup$
          Indeed, there's at least a few medieval maps out there that plunk Jerusalem right in the middle, for a real world example
          $endgroup$
          – Pingcode
          2 hours ago













          3














          $begingroup$

          The aliens know some mathematics that we don't.



          In the question, there is mention of a particular rectangular projection, best known as the Mercator projection. However, there are many other ways we Earth people have figured out for projecting a sphere onto something flat, including conic, conformal, gnomonic. There is a decent article at Wikipedia.



          Each of these projection the techniques requires an understanding of some type of geometry, trigonometry, or related areas of mathematics, and there could easily be other possible projections we have yet to discover, but the aliens have known for a long time. Their maps won't be radically different as a result, but perhaps just different enough to handwaved it into your story.






          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$




















            3














            $begingroup$

            The aliens know some mathematics that we don't.



            In the question, there is mention of a particular rectangular projection, best known as the Mercator projection. However, there are many other ways we Earth people have figured out for projecting a sphere onto something flat, including conic, conformal, gnomonic. There is a decent article at Wikipedia.



            Each of these projection the techniques requires an understanding of some type of geometry, trigonometry, or related areas of mathematics, and there could easily be other possible projections we have yet to discover, but the aliens have known for a long time. Their maps won't be radically different as a result, but perhaps just different enough to handwaved it into your story.






            share|improve this answer









            $endgroup$


















              3














              3










              3







              $begingroup$

              The aliens know some mathematics that we don't.



              In the question, there is mention of a particular rectangular projection, best known as the Mercator projection. However, there are many other ways we Earth people have figured out for projecting a sphere onto something flat, including conic, conformal, gnomonic. There is a decent article at Wikipedia.



              Each of these projection the techniques requires an understanding of some type of geometry, trigonometry, or related areas of mathematics, and there could easily be other possible projections we have yet to discover, but the aliens have known for a long time. Their maps won't be radically different as a result, but perhaps just different enough to handwaved it into your story.






              share|improve this answer









              $endgroup$



              The aliens know some mathematics that we don't.



              In the question, there is mention of a particular rectangular projection, best known as the Mercator projection. However, there are many other ways we Earth people have figured out for projecting a sphere onto something flat, including conic, conformal, gnomonic. There is a decent article at Wikipedia.



              Each of these projection the techniques requires an understanding of some type of geometry, trigonometry, or related areas of mathematics, and there could easily be other possible projections we have yet to discover, but the aliens have known for a long time. Their maps won't be radically different as a result, but perhaps just different enough to handwaved it into your story.







              share|improve this answer












              share|improve this answer



              share|improve this answer










              answered 9 hours ago









              cobaltduckcobaltduck

              7,82023 silver badges52 bronze badges




              7,82023 silver badges52 bronze badges


























                  3














                  $begingroup$

                  We project our world on a bi-dimensional surface because we learned to make flat surfaces well before making spheres.



                  And don't forget that you can easily cut a flat surface in smaller pieces, while cutting down a sphere is more difficult. In other words, if you don't need the whole world but just the 1000 km around the Republic of San Marino, it is more easy to do it on a flat surface than on a sphere.



                  Moreover, flat surfaces can be more easily carried around and stored. A map can be rolled up, a ball will stay a ball.



                  Change those factors above and you will have a different outcome with respect to map making.






                  share|improve this answer











                  $endgroup$















                  • $begingroup$
                    I'm sure a ball can be rolled up, too, just deflate it. Or if it's solid, it can be rolled up into the fourth dimension.
                    $endgroup$
                    – Yellow Sky
                    8 hours ago






                  • 2




                    $begingroup$
                    @YellowSky, we learned to use bark and skin way before we learned how to make an inflatable ball. And we still don't know how to roll something in the 4th dimension. If you do, please give me the instructions to do it.
                    $endgroup$
                    – L.Dutch
                    8 hours ago










                  • $begingroup$
                    Aren't we talking about aliens here? They may well be able to do that. Besides, we the people of Earth, have known how to roll things into the 4th dimension for quite a long time already, we just cannot practically do it, yet. The mathematical theory of four-dimensional space was precisely formalized in 1854 by Bernhard Riemann. The instructions are in that Wikipedia article.
                    $endgroup$
                    – Yellow Sky
                    8 hours ago








                  • 1




                    $begingroup$
                    @YellowSky In the context of this answer, "have a mathematical representation for X" and "know how to do X" are not remotely the same thing.
                    $endgroup$
                    – Geoffrey Brent
                    1 hour ago
















                  3














                  $begingroup$

                  We project our world on a bi-dimensional surface because we learned to make flat surfaces well before making spheres.



                  And don't forget that you can easily cut a flat surface in smaller pieces, while cutting down a sphere is more difficult. In other words, if you don't need the whole world but just the 1000 km around the Republic of San Marino, it is more easy to do it on a flat surface than on a sphere.



                  Moreover, flat surfaces can be more easily carried around and stored. A map can be rolled up, a ball will stay a ball.



                  Change those factors above and you will have a different outcome with respect to map making.






                  share|improve this answer











                  $endgroup$















                  • $begingroup$
                    I'm sure a ball can be rolled up, too, just deflate it. Or if it's solid, it can be rolled up into the fourth dimension.
                    $endgroup$
                    – Yellow Sky
                    8 hours ago






                  • 2




                    $begingroup$
                    @YellowSky, we learned to use bark and skin way before we learned how to make an inflatable ball. And we still don't know how to roll something in the 4th dimension. If you do, please give me the instructions to do it.
                    $endgroup$
                    – L.Dutch
                    8 hours ago










                  • $begingroup$
                    Aren't we talking about aliens here? They may well be able to do that. Besides, we the people of Earth, have known how to roll things into the 4th dimension for quite a long time already, we just cannot practically do it, yet. The mathematical theory of four-dimensional space was precisely formalized in 1854 by Bernhard Riemann. The instructions are in that Wikipedia article.
                    $endgroup$
                    – Yellow Sky
                    8 hours ago








                  • 1




                    $begingroup$
                    @YellowSky In the context of this answer, "have a mathematical representation for X" and "know how to do X" are not remotely the same thing.
                    $endgroup$
                    – Geoffrey Brent
                    1 hour ago














                  3














                  3










                  3







                  $begingroup$

                  We project our world on a bi-dimensional surface because we learned to make flat surfaces well before making spheres.



                  And don't forget that you can easily cut a flat surface in smaller pieces, while cutting down a sphere is more difficult. In other words, if you don't need the whole world but just the 1000 km around the Republic of San Marino, it is more easy to do it on a flat surface than on a sphere.



                  Moreover, flat surfaces can be more easily carried around and stored. A map can be rolled up, a ball will stay a ball.



                  Change those factors above and you will have a different outcome with respect to map making.






                  share|improve this answer











                  $endgroup$



                  We project our world on a bi-dimensional surface because we learned to make flat surfaces well before making spheres.



                  And don't forget that you can easily cut a flat surface in smaller pieces, while cutting down a sphere is more difficult. In other words, if you don't need the whole world but just the 1000 km around the Republic of San Marino, it is more easy to do it on a flat surface than on a sphere.



                  Moreover, flat surfaces can be more easily carried around and stored. A map can be rolled up, a ball will stay a ball.



                  Change those factors above and you will have a different outcome with respect to map making.







                  share|improve this answer














                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer








                  edited 9 hours ago

























                  answered 10 hours ago









                  L.DutchL.Dutch

                  113k35 gold badges263 silver badges545 bronze badges




                  113k35 gold badges263 silver badges545 bronze badges















                  • $begingroup$
                    I'm sure a ball can be rolled up, too, just deflate it. Or if it's solid, it can be rolled up into the fourth dimension.
                    $endgroup$
                    – Yellow Sky
                    8 hours ago






                  • 2




                    $begingroup$
                    @YellowSky, we learned to use bark and skin way before we learned how to make an inflatable ball. And we still don't know how to roll something in the 4th dimension. If you do, please give me the instructions to do it.
                    $endgroup$
                    – L.Dutch
                    8 hours ago










                  • $begingroup$
                    Aren't we talking about aliens here? They may well be able to do that. Besides, we the people of Earth, have known how to roll things into the 4th dimension for quite a long time already, we just cannot practically do it, yet. The mathematical theory of four-dimensional space was precisely formalized in 1854 by Bernhard Riemann. The instructions are in that Wikipedia article.
                    $endgroup$
                    – Yellow Sky
                    8 hours ago








                  • 1




                    $begingroup$
                    @YellowSky In the context of this answer, "have a mathematical representation for X" and "know how to do X" are not remotely the same thing.
                    $endgroup$
                    – Geoffrey Brent
                    1 hour ago


















                  • $begingroup$
                    I'm sure a ball can be rolled up, too, just deflate it. Or if it's solid, it can be rolled up into the fourth dimension.
                    $endgroup$
                    – Yellow Sky
                    8 hours ago






                  • 2




                    $begingroup$
                    @YellowSky, we learned to use bark and skin way before we learned how to make an inflatable ball. And we still don't know how to roll something in the 4th dimension. If you do, please give me the instructions to do it.
                    $endgroup$
                    – L.Dutch
                    8 hours ago










                  • $begingroup$
                    Aren't we talking about aliens here? They may well be able to do that. Besides, we the people of Earth, have known how to roll things into the 4th dimension for quite a long time already, we just cannot practically do it, yet. The mathematical theory of four-dimensional space was precisely formalized in 1854 by Bernhard Riemann. The instructions are in that Wikipedia article.
                    $endgroup$
                    – Yellow Sky
                    8 hours ago








                  • 1




                    $begingroup$
                    @YellowSky In the context of this answer, "have a mathematical representation for X" and "know how to do X" are not remotely the same thing.
                    $endgroup$
                    – Geoffrey Brent
                    1 hour ago
















                  $begingroup$
                  I'm sure a ball can be rolled up, too, just deflate it. Or if it's solid, it can be rolled up into the fourth dimension.
                  $endgroup$
                  – Yellow Sky
                  8 hours ago




                  $begingroup$
                  I'm sure a ball can be rolled up, too, just deflate it. Or if it's solid, it can be rolled up into the fourth dimension.
                  $endgroup$
                  – Yellow Sky
                  8 hours ago




                  2




                  2




                  $begingroup$
                  @YellowSky, we learned to use bark and skin way before we learned how to make an inflatable ball. And we still don't know how to roll something in the 4th dimension. If you do, please give me the instructions to do it.
                  $endgroup$
                  – L.Dutch
                  8 hours ago




                  $begingroup$
                  @YellowSky, we learned to use bark and skin way before we learned how to make an inflatable ball. And we still don't know how to roll something in the 4th dimension. If you do, please give me the instructions to do it.
                  $endgroup$
                  – L.Dutch
                  8 hours ago












                  $begingroup$
                  Aren't we talking about aliens here? They may well be able to do that. Besides, we the people of Earth, have known how to roll things into the 4th dimension for quite a long time already, we just cannot practically do it, yet. The mathematical theory of four-dimensional space was precisely formalized in 1854 by Bernhard Riemann. The instructions are in that Wikipedia article.
                  $endgroup$
                  – Yellow Sky
                  8 hours ago






                  $begingroup$
                  Aren't we talking about aliens here? They may well be able to do that. Besides, we the people of Earth, have known how to roll things into the 4th dimension for quite a long time already, we just cannot practically do it, yet. The mathematical theory of four-dimensional space was precisely formalized in 1854 by Bernhard Riemann. The instructions are in that Wikipedia article.
                  $endgroup$
                  – Yellow Sky
                  8 hours ago






                  1




                  1




                  $begingroup$
                  @YellowSky In the context of this answer, "have a mathematical representation for X" and "know how to do X" are not remotely the same thing.
                  $endgroup$
                  – Geoffrey Brent
                  1 hour ago




                  $begingroup$
                  @YellowSky In the context of this answer, "have a mathematical representation for X" and "know how to do X" are not remotely the same thing.
                  $endgroup$
                  – Geoffrey Brent
                  1 hour ago











                  1














                  $begingroup$

                  If you're dealing with cartological evolution, the answer is "pretty much nothing."



                  I suspect all species would develop maps in the following way:




                  1. They sit down with a stick and some rocks, draw the local river, put some rocks in to mark the villages, then in their own language intone the words, "grog, you take bugga and clobber dis place. Me take Wherk and pound over der."


                  2. A little while later, something akin to paper/vellum/papyrus is invented, and the conversation goes something like, "Hermicules, thou taketh thy holy troops and stand atop the Hilltop of Crahakia the Elder and then shalt thou count to three, no more, no less. Three shall be the number thou shalt count, and the number of the counting shall be three. Four shalt thou not count, nor either count thou two, excepting that thou then proceed to three. Five is right out! Once the number three, being the third number, be reached, then thou shalt assault the city in the name of Daiphus and bring salvation to the wicked!"1


                  3. A little later, someone discovers a rock, or a pin, or something on a leaf, that happens to point in a useful direction in a predictable way. Such a person might suggest that direction to be "Gorp!" Thereafter, the "top" of the page upon which the battle plan holy consecration is thus inscribed is known as "Gorp!"2


                  4. And sometime after that subways are invented and some genius figures out that actually knowing the geography involved with cartography isn't actually relevant or practical when it comes to dropping down to the corner to buy a box of smokes.



                  My point is, cartography inevitably starts with a 2-D rendering of the local geography and becomes more complex as more data needs to be represented, but there are only so many ways simple geography (the local river, hill, and village) can be represented unless your aliens don't have eyes.



                  An advanced species may have a reason for not using what Humans use today, but how they came to the threshold of that decision is, IMHO, highly unlikely to be any different than Humanity experienced.



                  Remember, knowledge is a pyramid, ever growing in size, and your aliens are at any given moment standing atop their pyramid. However, in the beginning, that pyramid is very small, and that means very little variation compared to any other sapient species.



                  IMHO.





                  1My undying thanks to Monty Python for one of the most enduring and funniest moments of dialog in history.



                  2It's worth noting that step #3 might come before step #2. It's a bit wishy-washy in the middle.






                  share|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$




















                    1














                    $begingroup$

                    If you're dealing with cartological evolution, the answer is "pretty much nothing."



                    I suspect all species would develop maps in the following way:




                    1. They sit down with a stick and some rocks, draw the local river, put some rocks in to mark the villages, then in their own language intone the words, "grog, you take bugga and clobber dis place. Me take Wherk and pound over der."


                    2. A little while later, something akin to paper/vellum/papyrus is invented, and the conversation goes something like, "Hermicules, thou taketh thy holy troops and stand atop the Hilltop of Crahakia the Elder and then shalt thou count to three, no more, no less. Three shall be the number thou shalt count, and the number of the counting shall be three. Four shalt thou not count, nor either count thou two, excepting that thou then proceed to three. Five is right out! Once the number three, being the third number, be reached, then thou shalt assault the city in the name of Daiphus and bring salvation to the wicked!"1


                    3. A little later, someone discovers a rock, or a pin, or something on a leaf, that happens to point in a useful direction in a predictable way. Such a person might suggest that direction to be "Gorp!" Thereafter, the "top" of the page upon which the battle plan holy consecration is thus inscribed is known as "Gorp!"2


                    4. And sometime after that subways are invented and some genius figures out that actually knowing the geography involved with cartography isn't actually relevant or practical when it comes to dropping down to the corner to buy a box of smokes.



                    My point is, cartography inevitably starts with a 2-D rendering of the local geography and becomes more complex as more data needs to be represented, but there are only so many ways simple geography (the local river, hill, and village) can be represented unless your aliens don't have eyes.



                    An advanced species may have a reason for not using what Humans use today, but how they came to the threshold of that decision is, IMHO, highly unlikely to be any different than Humanity experienced.



                    Remember, knowledge is a pyramid, ever growing in size, and your aliens are at any given moment standing atop their pyramid. However, in the beginning, that pyramid is very small, and that means very little variation compared to any other sapient species.



                    IMHO.





                    1My undying thanks to Monty Python for one of the most enduring and funniest moments of dialog in history.



                    2It's worth noting that step #3 might come before step #2. It's a bit wishy-washy in the middle.






                    share|improve this answer









                    $endgroup$


















                      1














                      1










                      1







                      $begingroup$

                      If you're dealing with cartological evolution, the answer is "pretty much nothing."



                      I suspect all species would develop maps in the following way:




                      1. They sit down with a stick and some rocks, draw the local river, put some rocks in to mark the villages, then in their own language intone the words, "grog, you take bugga and clobber dis place. Me take Wherk and pound over der."


                      2. A little while later, something akin to paper/vellum/papyrus is invented, and the conversation goes something like, "Hermicules, thou taketh thy holy troops and stand atop the Hilltop of Crahakia the Elder and then shalt thou count to three, no more, no less. Three shall be the number thou shalt count, and the number of the counting shall be three. Four shalt thou not count, nor either count thou two, excepting that thou then proceed to three. Five is right out! Once the number three, being the third number, be reached, then thou shalt assault the city in the name of Daiphus and bring salvation to the wicked!"1


                      3. A little later, someone discovers a rock, or a pin, or something on a leaf, that happens to point in a useful direction in a predictable way. Such a person might suggest that direction to be "Gorp!" Thereafter, the "top" of the page upon which the battle plan holy consecration is thus inscribed is known as "Gorp!"2


                      4. And sometime after that subways are invented and some genius figures out that actually knowing the geography involved with cartography isn't actually relevant or practical when it comes to dropping down to the corner to buy a box of smokes.



                      My point is, cartography inevitably starts with a 2-D rendering of the local geography and becomes more complex as more data needs to be represented, but there are only so many ways simple geography (the local river, hill, and village) can be represented unless your aliens don't have eyes.



                      An advanced species may have a reason for not using what Humans use today, but how they came to the threshold of that decision is, IMHO, highly unlikely to be any different than Humanity experienced.



                      Remember, knowledge is a pyramid, ever growing in size, and your aliens are at any given moment standing atop their pyramid. However, in the beginning, that pyramid is very small, and that means very little variation compared to any other sapient species.



                      IMHO.





                      1My undying thanks to Monty Python for one of the most enduring and funniest moments of dialog in history.



                      2It's worth noting that step #3 might come before step #2. It's a bit wishy-washy in the middle.






                      share|improve this answer









                      $endgroup$



                      If you're dealing with cartological evolution, the answer is "pretty much nothing."



                      I suspect all species would develop maps in the following way:




                      1. They sit down with a stick and some rocks, draw the local river, put some rocks in to mark the villages, then in their own language intone the words, "grog, you take bugga and clobber dis place. Me take Wherk and pound over der."


                      2. A little while later, something akin to paper/vellum/papyrus is invented, and the conversation goes something like, "Hermicules, thou taketh thy holy troops and stand atop the Hilltop of Crahakia the Elder and then shalt thou count to three, no more, no less. Three shall be the number thou shalt count, and the number of the counting shall be three. Four shalt thou not count, nor either count thou two, excepting that thou then proceed to three. Five is right out! Once the number three, being the third number, be reached, then thou shalt assault the city in the name of Daiphus and bring salvation to the wicked!"1


                      3. A little later, someone discovers a rock, or a pin, or something on a leaf, that happens to point in a useful direction in a predictable way. Such a person might suggest that direction to be "Gorp!" Thereafter, the "top" of the page upon which the battle plan holy consecration is thus inscribed is known as "Gorp!"2


                      4. And sometime after that subways are invented and some genius figures out that actually knowing the geography involved with cartography isn't actually relevant or practical when it comes to dropping down to the corner to buy a box of smokes.



                      My point is, cartography inevitably starts with a 2-D rendering of the local geography and becomes more complex as more data needs to be represented, but there are only so many ways simple geography (the local river, hill, and village) can be represented unless your aliens don't have eyes.



                      An advanced species may have a reason for not using what Humans use today, but how they came to the threshold of that decision is, IMHO, highly unlikely to be any different than Humanity experienced.



                      Remember, knowledge is a pyramid, ever growing in size, and your aliens are at any given moment standing atop their pyramid. However, in the beginning, that pyramid is very small, and that means very little variation compared to any other sapient species.



                      IMHO.





                      1My undying thanks to Monty Python for one of the most enduring and funniest moments of dialog in history.



                      2It's worth noting that step #3 might come before step #2. It's a bit wishy-washy in the middle.







                      share|improve this answer












                      share|improve this answer



                      share|improve this answer










                      answered 3 hours ago









                      JBHJBH

                      57.2k9 gold badges131 silver badges276 bronze badges




                      57.2k9 gold badges131 silver badges276 bronze badges


























                          1














                          $begingroup$

                          As others pointed out, there are some well-explored ways to project a sphere onto a map sheet, including ones to preserve angles (e.g. Mercator) or to perserve areas (e.g. Gall-Peters). Each has advantages and drawbacks for various purposes, and there is mathematical proof that there is projection to perserve angles, distances, and areas at the same time.




                          • Have your aliens use an azimuthal equidistant projection centered on a holy city or capital. Then have some adventure set on the opposite end of the world, near the point which becomes the outer rim of the map. (The usual maps have two such points, but they are at the poles where few people live.)

                          • Have them use a Peirce projection.


                          But in both cases you would have a flat map and one would have to know the continents to recognize how they are distorted.






                          share|improve this answer









                          $endgroup$




















                            1














                            $begingroup$

                            As others pointed out, there are some well-explored ways to project a sphere onto a map sheet, including ones to preserve angles (e.g. Mercator) or to perserve areas (e.g. Gall-Peters). Each has advantages and drawbacks for various purposes, and there is mathematical proof that there is projection to perserve angles, distances, and areas at the same time.




                            • Have your aliens use an azimuthal equidistant projection centered on a holy city or capital. Then have some adventure set on the opposite end of the world, near the point which becomes the outer rim of the map. (The usual maps have two such points, but they are at the poles where few people live.)

                            • Have them use a Peirce projection.


                            But in both cases you would have a flat map and one would have to know the continents to recognize how they are distorted.






                            share|improve this answer









                            $endgroup$


















                              1














                              1










                              1







                              $begingroup$

                              As others pointed out, there are some well-explored ways to project a sphere onto a map sheet, including ones to preserve angles (e.g. Mercator) or to perserve areas (e.g. Gall-Peters). Each has advantages and drawbacks for various purposes, and there is mathematical proof that there is projection to perserve angles, distances, and areas at the same time.




                              • Have your aliens use an azimuthal equidistant projection centered on a holy city or capital. Then have some adventure set on the opposite end of the world, near the point which becomes the outer rim of the map. (The usual maps have two such points, but they are at the poles where few people live.)

                              • Have them use a Peirce projection.


                              But in both cases you would have a flat map and one would have to know the continents to recognize how they are distorted.






                              share|improve this answer









                              $endgroup$



                              As others pointed out, there are some well-explored ways to project a sphere onto a map sheet, including ones to preserve angles (e.g. Mercator) or to perserve areas (e.g. Gall-Peters). Each has advantages and drawbacks for various purposes, and there is mathematical proof that there is projection to perserve angles, distances, and areas at the same time.




                              • Have your aliens use an azimuthal equidistant projection centered on a holy city or capital. Then have some adventure set on the opposite end of the world, near the point which becomes the outer rim of the map. (The usual maps have two such points, but they are at the poles where few people live.)

                              • Have them use a Peirce projection.


                              But in both cases you would have a flat map and one would have to know the continents to recognize how they are distorted.







                              share|improve this answer












                              share|improve this answer



                              share|improve this answer










                              answered 19 mins ago









                              o.m.o.m.

                              68.7k7 gold badges104 silver badges232 bronze badges




                              68.7k7 gold badges104 silver badges232 bronze badges


























                                  0














                                  $begingroup$

                                  The geography of the alien planet can be very different from ours. Imagine a water world with just a single continent centered on one of the poles, like our Antarctica, with no other continents, not even islands. In this case, they wouldn't just need to map the other water-only hemisphere, and their maps will be of round shape with the pole in the center.



                                  Or the planet can have the shape not near-spheric like the Earth's, but of irregular shape, for example it had a heavy collision with another object that deformed it. In this case, the projection of the planet's shape on a flat surface can take rather weird shapes, the ones that cannot fit effectively into a rectangle, or the planet can have even not two, but three or more "hemispheres", so where we have the map of two round hemispheres, their map will have four triangular ones.



                                  We can go on imagining different geographies and different planet shapes with their respective maps. I'd love to see a map of a planet which has tunnels going through the core as wide as to allow the aliens to live not on the outer surface of the planet, but on the inner surfaces of the tunnels, too.






                                  share|improve this answer








                                  New contributor



                                  Yellow Sky is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                  Check out our Code of Conduct.





                                  $endgroup$




















                                    0














                                    $begingroup$

                                    The geography of the alien planet can be very different from ours. Imagine a water world with just a single continent centered on one of the poles, like our Antarctica, with no other continents, not even islands. In this case, they wouldn't just need to map the other water-only hemisphere, and their maps will be of round shape with the pole in the center.



                                    Or the planet can have the shape not near-spheric like the Earth's, but of irregular shape, for example it had a heavy collision with another object that deformed it. In this case, the projection of the planet's shape on a flat surface can take rather weird shapes, the ones that cannot fit effectively into a rectangle, or the planet can have even not two, but three or more "hemispheres", so where we have the map of two round hemispheres, their map will have four triangular ones.



                                    We can go on imagining different geographies and different planet shapes with their respective maps. I'd love to see a map of a planet which has tunnels going through the core as wide as to allow the aliens to live not on the outer surface of the planet, but on the inner surfaces of the tunnels, too.






                                    share|improve this answer








                                    New contributor



                                    Yellow Sky is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                    Check out our Code of Conduct.





                                    $endgroup$


















                                      0














                                      0










                                      0







                                      $begingroup$

                                      The geography of the alien planet can be very different from ours. Imagine a water world with just a single continent centered on one of the poles, like our Antarctica, with no other continents, not even islands. In this case, they wouldn't just need to map the other water-only hemisphere, and their maps will be of round shape with the pole in the center.



                                      Or the planet can have the shape not near-spheric like the Earth's, but of irregular shape, for example it had a heavy collision with another object that deformed it. In this case, the projection of the planet's shape on a flat surface can take rather weird shapes, the ones that cannot fit effectively into a rectangle, or the planet can have even not two, but three or more "hemispheres", so where we have the map of two round hemispheres, their map will have four triangular ones.



                                      We can go on imagining different geographies and different planet shapes with their respective maps. I'd love to see a map of a planet which has tunnels going through the core as wide as to allow the aliens to live not on the outer surface of the planet, but on the inner surfaces of the tunnels, too.






                                      share|improve this answer








                                      New contributor



                                      Yellow Sky is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                      Check out our Code of Conduct.





                                      $endgroup$



                                      The geography of the alien planet can be very different from ours. Imagine a water world with just a single continent centered on one of the poles, like our Antarctica, with no other continents, not even islands. In this case, they wouldn't just need to map the other water-only hemisphere, and their maps will be of round shape with the pole in the center.



                                      Or the planet can have the shape not near-spheric like the Earth's, but of irregular shape, for example it had a heavy collision with another object that deformed it. In this case, the projection of the planet's shape on a flat surface can take rather weird shapes, the ones that cannot fit effectively into a rectangle, or the planet can have even not two, but three or more "hemispheres", so where we have the map of two round hemispheres, their map will have four triangular ones.



                                      We can go on imagining different geographies and different planet shapes with their respective maps. I'd love to see a map of a planet which has tunnels going through the core as wide as to allow the aliens to live not on the outer surface of the planet, but on the inner surfaces of the tunnels, too.







                                      share|improve this answer








                                      New contributor



                                      Yellow Sky is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                      Check out our Code of Conduct.








                                      share|improve this answer



                                      share|improve this answer






                                      New contributor



                                      Yellow Sky is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                      Check out our Code of Conduct.








                                      answered 9 hours ago









                                      Yellow SkyYellow Sky

                                      1012 bronze badges




                                      1012 bronze badges




                                      New contributor



                                      Yellow Sky is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                      Check out our Code of Conduct.




                                      New contributor




                                      Yellow Sky is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                      Check out our Code of Conduct.




































                                          draft saved

                                          draft discarded



















































                                          Thanks for contributing an answer to Worldbuilding Stack Exchange!


                                          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                          But avoid



                                          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                                          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                                          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                          draft saved


                                          draft discarded














                                          StackExchange.ready(
                                          function () {
                                          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f156714%2fwhat-would-influence-an-alien-race-to-map-their-planet-in-a-way-other-than-the-t%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                                          }
                                          );

                                          Post as a guest















                                          Required, but never shown





















































                                          Required, but never shown














                                          Required, but never shown












                                          Required, but never shown







                                          Required, but never shown

































                                          Required, but never shown














                                          Required, but never shown












                                          Required, but never shown







                                          Required, but never shown







                                          Popular posts from this blog

                                          Taj Mahal Inhaltsverzeichnis Aufbau | Geschichte | 350-Jahr-Feier | Heutige Bedeutung | Siehe auch |...

                                          Baia Sprie Cuprins Etimologie | Istorie | Demografie | Politică și administrație | Arii naturale...

                                          Ciclooctatetraenă Vezi și | Bibliografie | Meniu de navigare637866text4148569-500570979m