How do I assign static IPs for HOST, BRIDGE, and GUESTno network on domU in network-bridge configuration for...

What determines the top speed in ice skating?

How to copy the path of current directory in ubuntu 18.04

Low-magic medieval fantasy clothes that allow the wearer to grow?

Can you pitch an outline?

Postman Delivery

Does "Op. cit." stand for "opus citatum" or "opere citato"?

How can I adjust the sequential numbering scheme when exporting Photos?

Can I perform Umrah while on a Saudi Arabian visit e-visa

Water Bottle Rocket Thrust - two calculation methods not matching

Meaning/translation of title "The Light Fantastic" By Terry Pratchett

How to work with ElasticSearch in Mathematica?

How to ride a fish?

Are there any privately owned large commercial airports?

Reduction of carbamate with LAH

Why didn't Snape ask Dumbledore why he let "Moody" search his office?

How could "aggressor" pilots fly foreign aircraft without speaking the language?

Relation between signal processing and control systems engineering?

How can we check whether the user input equal to one elements of an array?

Can massive damage kill you while at 0 HP?

Do "chess engine in the cloud" services exist?

There is any way today to recover/dump 2M disks?

Modern warfare theory in a medieval setting

Can you add a collaborator to a Glyph of Warding?

How to discipline overeager engineer



How do I assign static IPs for HOST, BRIDGE, and GUEST


no network on domU in network-bridge configuration for Xen-4.0Change ip addr label in LinuxHow to create permanent ip alias belonging to different subnets in CentosConfusion about interfaces, iptables, connections, local connectionFTP not happening on RHEL 6 Server configured using a Vm Player 11How to create/setup vpn using only SSH?Script to create macvlan bridge on the host doesn't work unless it's run twiceDebian8 server : Can't resolve IP adresses or DNSHow to find the network namespace of a veth peer ifindex?






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{
margin-bottom:0;
}








2















I am learning networking by building a small virtual network within a CentOS host. I need some guidance at the highest level to start planning:






The Scenario:

A CentOS 7 HOST needs to have a CentOS 7 GUEST, and both the HOST and the GUEST must each have different static public IP addresses. I understand that this is accomplished by creating a bridge on the HOST.



The HOST physical box is connected via Ethernet to a router/modem that has a GATEWAY IP address of 12.34.567.8aa. There are 5 public static IP addresses available, including 12.34.567.111, 12.34.567.222, 12.34.567.333, 12.34.567.444, and 12.34.567.555



How should the static public IP addresses be defined for the HOST, the BRIDGE, and the GUEST? Should they have three separate IP addresses? Or should the HOST and the BRIDGE have the same IP?



The current ip addresses as defined on the HOST are as follows. The HOST's connection to the router/modem is eno1, and the BRIDGE is defined as br1.



[root@remote-host ~]# ip addr
1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 65536 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN qlen 1
link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00
inet 127.0.0.1/8 scope host lo
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
inet6 ::1/128 scope host
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
2: eno1: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast state UP qlen 1000
link/ether making:this:anonymous brd making:this:anonymous
inet 12.34.567.111/29 brd 12.34.567.8xx scope global eno1
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
inet6 making:this:anonymous scope global dynamic
valid_lft 414553sec preferred_lft 414553sec
inet6 making:this:anonymous scope global noprefixroute dynamic
valid_lft 2419198sec preferred_lft 345598sec
inet6 making:this:anonymous scope link
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
3: wlp3s0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 qdisc noop state DOWN qlen 1000
link/ether making:this:anonymous brd making:this:anonymous
4: virbr0: <NO-CARRIER,BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue state DOWN qlen 1000
link/ether making:this:anonymous brd making:this:anonymous
5: virbr0-nic: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast master virbr0 state DOWN qlen 1000
link/ether making:this:anonymous brd making:this:anonymous
50: br1: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue state UP qlen 1000
link/ether making:this:anonymous brd making:this:anonymous
inet 12.34.567.111/29 brd 12.34.567.8xx scope global br1
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
inet6 making:this:anonymous scope link
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
63: vnet0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast master br1 state UNKNOWN qlen 1000
link/ether making:this:anonymous brd making:this:anonymous
inet6 making:this:anonymous scope link
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
[root@remote-host ~]#









share|improve this question

















bumped to the homepage by Community 49 mins ago


This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.























    2















    I am learning networking by building a small virtual network within a CentOS host. I need some guidance at the highest level to start planning:






    The Scenario:

    A CentOS 7 HOST needs to have a CentOS 7 GUEST, and both the HOST and the GUEST must each have different static public IP addresses. I understand that this is accomplished by creating a bridge on the HOST.



    The HOST physical box is connected via Ethernet to a router/modem that has a GATEWAY IP address of 12.34.567.8aa. There are 5 public static IP addresses available, including 12.34.567.111, 12.34.567.222, 12.34.567.333, 12.34.567.444, and 12.34.567.555



    How should the static public IP addresses be defined for the HOST, the BRIDGE, and the GUEST? Should they have three separate IP addresses? Or should the HOST and the BRIDGE have the same IP?



    The current ip addresses as defined on the HOST are as follows. The HOST's connection to the router/modem is eno1, and the BRIDGE is defined as br1.



    [root@remote-host ~]# ip addr
    1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 65536 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN qlen 1
    link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00
    inet 127.0.0.1/8 scope host lo
    valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
    inet6 ::1/128 scope host
    valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
    2: eno1: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast state UP qlen 1000
    link/ether making:this:anonymous brd making:this:anonymous
    inet 12.34.567.111/29 brd 12.34.567.8xx scope global eno1
    valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
    inet6 making:this:anonymous scope global dynamic
    valid_lft 414553sec preferred_lft 414553sec
    inet6 making:this:anonymous scope global noprefixroute dynamic
    valid_lft 2419198sec preferred_lft 345598sec
    inet6 making:this:anonymous scope link
    valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
    3: wlp3s0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 qdisc noop state DOWN qlen 1000
    link/ether making:this:anonymous brd making:this:anonymous
    4: virbr0: <NO-CARRIER,BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue state DOWN qlen 1000
    link/ether making:this:anonymous brd making:this:anonymous
    5: virbr0-nic: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast master virbr0 state DOWN qlen 1000
    link/ether making:this:anonymous brd making:this:anonymous
    50: br1: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue state UP qlen 1000
    link/ether making:this:anonymous brd making:this:anonymous
    inet 12.34.567.111/29 brd 12.34.567.8xx scope global br1
    valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
    inet6 making:this:anonymous scope link
    valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
    63: vnet0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast master br1 state UNKNOWN qlen 1000
    link/ether making:this:anonymous brd making:this:anonymous
    inet6 making:this:anonymous scope link
    valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
    [root@remote-host ~]#









    share|improve this question

















    bumped to the homepage by Community 49 mins ago


    This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.



















      2












      2








      2








      I am learning networking by building a small virtual network within a CentOS host. I need some guidance at the highest level to start planning:






      The Scenario:

      A CentOS 7 HOST needs to have a CentOS 7 GUEST, and both the HOST and the GUEST must each have different static public IP addresses. I understand that this is accomplished by creating a bridge on the HOST.



      The HOST physical box is connected via Ethernet to a router/modem that has a GATEWAY IP address of 12.34.567.8aa. There are 5 public static IP addresses available, including 12.34.567.111, 12.34.567.222, 12.34.567.333, 12.34.567.444, and 12.34.567.555



      How should the static public IP addresses be defined for the HOST, the BRIDGE, and the GUEST? Should they have three separate IP addresses? Or should the HOST and the BRIDGE have the same IP?



      The current ip addresses as defined on the HOST are as follows. The HOST's connection to the router/modem is eno1, and the BRIDGE is defined as br1.



      [root@remote-host ~]# ip addr
      1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 65536 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN qlen 1
      link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00
      inet 127.0.0.1/8 scope host lo
      valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
      inet6 ::1/128 scope host
      valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
      2: eno1: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast state UP qlen 1000
      link/ether making:this:anonymous brd making:this:anonymous
      inet 12.34.567.111/29 brd 12.34.567.8xx scope global eno1
      valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
      inet6 making:this:anonymous scope global dynamic
      valid_lft 414553sec preferred_lft 414553sec
      inet6 making:this:anonymous scope global noprefixroute dynamic
      valid_lft 2419198sec preferred_lft 345598sec
      inet6 making:this:anonymous scope link
      valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
      3: wlp3s0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 qdisc noop state DOWN qlen 1000
      link/ether making:this:anonymous brd making:this:anonymous
      4: virbr0: <NO-CARRIER,BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue state DOWN qlen 1000
      link/ether making:this:anonymous brd making:this:anonymous
      5: virbr0-nic: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast master virbr0 state DOWN qlen 1000
      link/ether making:this:anonymous brd making:this:anonymous
      50: br1: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue state UP qlen 1000
      link/ether making:this:anonymous brd making:this:anonymous
      inet 12.34.567.111/29 brd 12.34.567.8xx scope global br1
      valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
      inet6 making:this:anonymous scope link
      valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
      63: vnet0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast master br1 state UNKNOWN qlen 1000
      link/ether making:this:anonymous brd making:this:anonymous
      inet6 making:this:anonymous scope link
      valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
      [root@remote-host ~]#









      share|improve this question
















      I am learning networking by building a small virtual network within a CentOS host. I need some guidance at the highest level to start planning:






      The Scenario:

      A CentOS 7 HOST needs to have a CentOS 7 GUEST, and both the HOST and the GUEST must each have different static public IP addresses. I understand that this is accomplished by creating a bridge on the HOST.



      The HOST physical box is connected via Ethernet to a router/modem that has a GATEWAY IP address of 12.34.567.8aa. There are 5 public static IP addresses available, including 12.34.567.111, 12.34.567.222, 12.34.567.333, 12.34.567.444, and 12.34.567.555



      How should the static public IP addresses be defined for the HOST, the BRIDGE, and the GUEST? Should they have three separate IP addresses? Or should the HOST and the BRIDGE have the same IP?



      The current ip addresses as defined on the HOST are as follows. The HOST's connection to the router/modem is eno1, and the BRIDGE is defined as br1.



      [root@remote-host ~]# ip addr
      1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 65536 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN qlen 1
      link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00
      inet 127.0.0.1/8 scope host lo
      valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
      inet6 ::1/128 scope host
      valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
      2: eno1: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast state UP qlen 1000
      link/ether making:this:anonymous brd making:this:anonymous
      inet 12.34.567.111/29 brd 12.34.567.8xx scope global eno1
      valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
      inet6 making:this:anonymous scope global dynamic
      valid_lft 414553sec preferred_lft 414553sec
      inet6 making:this:anonymous scope global noprefixroute dynamic
      valid_lft 2419198sec preferred_lft 345598sec
      inet6 making:this:anonymous scope link
      valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
      3: wlp3s0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 qdisc noop state DOWN qlen 1000
      link/ether making:this:anonymous brd making:this:anonymous
      4: virbr0: <NO-CARRIER,BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue state DOWN qlen 1000
      link/ether making:this:anonymous brd making:this:anonymous
      5: virbr0-nic: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast master virbr0 state DOWN qlen 1000
      link/ether making:this:anonymous brd making:this:anonymous
      50: br1: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue state UP qlen 1000
      link/ether making:this:anonymous brd making:this:anonymous
      inet 12.34.567.111/29 brd 12.34.567.8xx scope global br1
      valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
      inet6 making:this:anonymous scope link
      valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
      63: vnet0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast master br1 state UNKNOWN qlen 1000
      link/ether making:this:anonymous brd making:this:anonymous
      inet6 making:this:anonymous scope link
      valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
      [root@remote-host ~]#






      centos networking virtual-machine ip bridge






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited Mar 25 '17 at 1:55







      CodeMed

















      asked Mar 24 '17 at 22:04









      CodeMedCodeMed

      1,98129 gold badges73 silver badges111 bronze badges




      1,98129 gold badges73 silver badges111 bronze badges






      bumped to the homepage by Community 49 mins ago


      This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.









      bumped to the homepage by Community 49 mins ago


      This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.







      bumped to the homepage by Community 49 mins ago


      This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          0
















          According to libvirt documentation:




          Bridge to LAN



          This is the recommended config for general guest connectivity on hosts
          with static wired networking configs.



          Provides a bridge from the VM directly to the LAN. This assumes there
          is a bridge device on the host which has one or more of the hosts
          physical NICs enslaved. The guest VM will have an associated tun
          device created with a name of vnetN, which can also be overridden with
          the element (see overriding the target element). The tun
          device will be enslaved to the bridge. The IP range / network
          configuration is whatever is used on the LAN. This provides the guest
          VM full incoming & outgoing net access just like a physical machine.




          Using virsh to Create Bridge



          According to RHEL Documentation, you can use virsh to create a bridge, e.g. br0 bridge based on the eth0 interface:



          # virsh iface-bridge eth0 br0


          Should you want/need to remove the bridge, do



          # virsh iface-unbridge br0


          Creating network initscripts



          If that doesn't work the way you need it to be, create/edit the init-scripts in /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ manually. This section is directly from the libvirt documentation page:



          In the /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts directory it is neccessary to create 2 config files. The first (ifcfg-eth0) defines your physical network interface, and says that it will be part of a bridge:



          # cat > ifcfg-eth0 <<EOF
          DEVICE=eth0
          HWADDR=00:16:76:D6:C9:45
          ONBOOT=yes
          BRIDGE=br0
          NM_CONTROLLED=no
          EOF


          Obviously change the HWADDR to match your actual NIC's address. You may also wish to configure the device's MTU here using e.g. MTU=9000.



          The second config file (ifcfg-br0) defines the bridge device:



          # cat > ifcfg-br0 <<EOF
          DEVICE=br0
          TYPE=Bridge
          BOOTPROTO=dhcp
          ONBOOT=yes
          DELAY=0
          NM_CONTROLLED=no
          EOF


          WARNING: The line TYPE=Bridge is case-sensitive - it must have uppercase 'B' and lower case 'ridge'



          After changing this restart networking (or simply reboot)



           # service network restart


          The final step is to disable netfilter on the bridge:



           # cat >> /etc/sysctl.conf <<EOF
          net.bridge.bridge-nf-call-ip6tables = 0
          net.bridge.bridge-nf-call-iptables = 0
          net.bridge.bridge-nf-call-arptables = 0
          EOF
          # sysctl -p /etc/sysctl.conf


          It is recommended to do this for performance and security reasons. See Fedora bug #512206. Alternatively you can configure iptables to allow all traffic to be forwarded across the bridge:



          # echo "-I FORWARD -m physdev --physdev-is-bridged -j ACCEPT" > /etc/sysconfig/iptables-forward-bridged
          # lokkit --custom-rules=ipv4:filter:/etc/sysconfig/iptables-forward-bridged
          # service libvirtd reload


          NetworManager and Bridging



          Though I'm not sure if this is still true, as there's active development, NetworkManager does not support bridging. Therefore, it may be necessary to disable it and use the network service instead:



          # chkconfig NetworkManager off
          # chkconfig network on
          # service NetworkManager stop
          # service network start


          So, once you create the "bridge" interface, enslave the physical NIC to it as outlined within the documentation, then you need to edit the Virtual Guest's configuration to enslave its NIC to the bridge on the host as well.



          ...
          <devices>
          ...
          <interface type='bridge'>
          <source bridge='br0'/>
          </interface>
          <interface type='bridge'>
          <source bridge='br1'/>
          <target dev='vnet7'/>
          <mac address="00:11:22:33:44:55"/>
          </interface>
          ...
          </devices>


          Once that's done, the router, to which your host's physical NIC is connected, will assign addresses via DHCP to the bridged interfaces--both for the host and/or the guest.







          There's a Q&A on Serverfault that might be helpful in getting the guest configuration set up. Essentially, using virsh (assuming you're working with libvirt), do



          virsh net-list
          virsh net-edit $NETWORKNAME


          Look for the dhcp section and edit to something like this



          <dhcp>
          <range start='192.168.122.100' end='192.168.122.254'/>
          <host mac='52:54:00:6c:3c:01' name='vm1' ip='192.168.122.11'/>
          <host mac='52:54:00:6c:3c:02' name='vm2' ip='192.168.122.12'/>
          <host mac='52:54:00:6c:3c:03' name='vm3' ip='192.168.122.12'/>
          </dhcp>


          Note: There might be a "hosts" file in /var/lib/libvirt/dnsmasq/ with existing mappings.



          nl /var/lib/libvirt/dnsmasq/myvirtnet.lan.hostsfile 
          1 52:54:00:39:ae:1c,192.168.122.242,minirhel.myvirtnet
          2 52:54:00:9b:0a:42,192.168.122.133,rhel7.myvirtnet
          3 52:54:00:f9:1e:45,192.168.122.134,rhel7.myvirtnet
          4 52:54:00:b0:d5:38,192.168.122.205,redqcow.myvirtnet
          5 52:54:00:af:c4:9c,192.168.122.206,redqcow.myvirtnet







          share|improve this answer




























          • Thank you. Does the physical router that the physical host is attached to via Ethernet cable need to have dhcp activated? And also, starting with a clean installation of CentOS on the host, how should the host's Ethernet connection to the external physical network be configured in CentOS?

            – CodeMed
            Mar 25 '17 at 4:05













          • I think the route would have to have DHCP enabled. You may be able to set a static IP on the router side, though I'm not certain. You should try using DHCP and check the router for the give IPs and the respective MAC addresses. That way you could always try to assign Static IPs using those MAC addresses.

            – ILMostro_7
            Mar 25 '17 at 17:21











          • I am carefully decomposing all that you were kind enough to write. Thank you. But I notice that you are propagating confusion about NetworkManager and bridging. Such confusion is what makes the many google results on this topic confusing and error-prone. While I cannot confirm or deny how NetworkManager and virsh interact with bridges, this link seems to indicate that NetworkManager can create and manage bridges.

            – CodeMed
            Mar 26 '17 at 16:37











          • @CodeMed the reason I mentioned the issue with bridging and NetworkManager is because that's in the RHEL docs. However, I recall seeing somewhere that NetworkManager had, indeed, received the necessary updates for bridging to work properly; hence my additional quip about ongoing development in NetworkManager.

            – ILMostro_7
            Mar 27 '17 at 7:48













          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "106"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/"u003ecc by-sa 4.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });















          draft saved

          draft discarded
















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f353697%2fhow-do-i-assign-static-ips-for-host-bridge-and-guest%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          0
















          According to libvirt documentation:




          Bridge to LAN



          This is the recommended config for general guest connectivity on hosts
          with static wired networking configs.



          Provides a bridge from the VM directly to the LAN. This assumes there
          is a bridge device on the host which has one or more of the hosts
          physical NICs enslaved. The guest VM will have an associated tun
          device created with a name of vnetN, which can also be overridden with
          the element (see overriding the target element). The tun
          device will be enslaved to the bridge. The IP range / network
          configuration is whatever is used on the LAN. This provides the guest
          VM full incoming & outgoing net access just like a physical machine.




          Using virsh to Create Bridge



          According to RHEL Documentation, you can use virsh to create a bridge, e.g. br0 bridge based on the eth0 interface:



          # virsh iface-bridge eth0 br0


          Should you want/need to remove the bridge, do



          # virsh iface-unbridge br0


          Creating network initscripts



          If that doesn't work the way you need it to be, create/edit the init-scripts in /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ manually. This section is directly from the libvirt documentation page:



          In the /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts directory it is neccessary to create 2 config files. The first (ifcfg-eth0) defines your physical network interface, and says that it will be part of a bridge:



          # cat > ifcfg-eth0 <<EOF
          DEVICE=eth0
          HWADDR=00:16:76:D6:C9:45
          ONBOOT=yes
          BRIDGE=br0
          NM_CONTROLLED=no
          EOF


          Obviously change the HWADDR to match your actual NIC's address. You may also wish to configure the device's MTU here using e.g. MTU=9000.



          The second config file (ifcfg-br0) defines the bridge device:



          # cat > ifcfg-br0 <<EOF
          DEVICE=br0
          TYPE=Bridge
          BOOTPROTO=dhcp
          ONBOOT=yes
          DELAY=0
          NM_CONTROLLED=no
          EOF


          WARNING: The line TYPE=Bridge is case-sensitive - it must have uppercase 'B' and lower case 'ridge'



          After changing this restart networking (or simply reboot)



           # service network restart


          The final step is to disable netfilter on the bridge:



           # cat >> /etc/sysctl.conf <<EOF
          net.bridge.bridge-nf-call-ip6tables = 0
          net.bridge.bridge-nf-call-iptables = 0
          net.bridge.bridge-nf-call-arptables = 0
          EOF
          # sysctl -p /etc/sysctl.conf


          It is recommended to do this for performance and security reasons. See Fedora bug #512206. Alternatively you can configure iptables to allow all traffic to be forwarded across the bridge:



          # echo "-I FORWARD -m physdev --physdev-is-bridged -j ACCEPT" > /etc/sysconfig/iptables-forward-bridged
          # lokkit --custom-rules=ipv4:filter:/etc/sysconfig/iptables-forward-bridged
          # service libvirtd reload


          NetworManager and Bridging



          Though I'm not sure if this is still true, as there's active development, NetworkManager does not support bridging. Therefore, it may be necessary to disable it and use the network service instead:



          # chkconfig NetworkManager off
          # chkconfig network on
          # service NetworkManager stop
          # service network start


          So, once you create the "bridge" interface, enslave the physical NIC to it as outlined within the documentation, then you need to edit the Virtual Guest's configuration to enslave its NIC to the bridge on the host as well.



          ...
          <devices>
          ...
          <interface type='bridge'>
          <source bridge='br0'/>
          </interface>
          <interface type='bridge'>
          <source bridge='br1'/>
          <target dev='vnet7'/>
          <mac address="00:11:22:33:44:55"/>
          </interface>
          ...
          </devices>


          Once that's done, the router, to which your host's physical NIC is connected, will assign addresses via DHCP to the bridged interfaces--both for the host and/or the guest.







          There's a Q&A on Serverfault that might be helpful in getting the guest configuration set up. Essentially, using virsh (assuming you're working with libvirt), do



          virsh net-list
          virsh net-edit $NETWORKNAME


          Look for the dhcp section and edit to something like this



          <dhcp>
          <range start='192.168.122.100' end='192.168.122.254'/>
          <host mac='52:54:00:6c:3c:01' name='vm1' ip='192.168.122.11'/>
          <host mac='52:54:00:6c:3c:02' name='vm2' ip='192.168.122.12'/>
          <host mac='52:54:00:6c:3c:03' name='vm3' ip='192.168.122.12'/>
          </dhcp>


          Note: There might be a "hosts" file in /var/lib/libvirt/dnsmasq/ with existing mappings.



          nl /var/lib/libvirt/dnsmasq/myvirtnet.lan.hostsfile 
          1 52:54:00:39:ae:1c,192.168.122.242,minirhel.myvirtnet
          2 52:54:00:9b:0a:42,192.168.122.133,rhel7.myvirtnet
          3 52:54:00:f9:1e:45,192.168.122.134,rhel7.myvirtnet
          4 52:54:00:b0:d5:38,192.168.122.205,redqcow.myvirtnet
          5 52:54:00:af:c4:9c,192.168.122.206,redqcow.myvirtnet







          share|improve this answer




























          • Thank you. Does the physical router that the physical host is attached to via Ethernet cable need to have dhcp activated? And also, starting with a clean installation of CentOS on the host, how should the host's Ethernet connection to the external physical network be configured in CentOS?

            – CodeMed
            Mar 25 '17 at 4:05













          • I think the route would have to have DHCP enabled. You may be able to set a static IP on the router side, though I'm not certain. You should try using DHCP and check the router for the give IPs and the respective MAC addresses. That way you could always try to assign Static IPs using those MAC addresses.

            – ILMostro_7
            Mar 25 '17 at 17:21











          • I am carefully decomposing all that you were kind enough to write. Thank you. But I notice that you are propagating confusion about NetworkManager and bridging. Such confusion is what makes the many google results on this topic confusing and error-prone. While I cannot confirm or deny how NetworkManager and virsh interact with bridges, this link seems to indicate that NetworkManager can create and manage bridges.

            – CodeMed
            Mar 26 '17 at 16:37











          • @CodeMed the reason I mentioned the issue with bridging and NetworkManager is because that's in the RHEL docs. However, I recall seeing somewhere that NetworkManager had, indeed, received the necessary updates for bridging to work properly; hence my additional quip about ongoing development in NetworkManager.

            – ILMostro_7
            Mar 27 '17 at 7:48
















          0
















          According to libvirt documentation:




          Bridge to LAN



          This is the recommended config for general guest connectivity on hosts
          with static wired networking configs.



          Provides a bridge from the VM directly to the LAN. This assumes there
          is a bridge device on the host which has one or more of the hosts
          physical NICs enslaved. The guest VM will have an associated tun
          device created with a name of vnetN, which can also be overridden with
          the element (see overriding the target element). The tun
          device will be enslaved to the bridge. The IP range / network
          configuration is whatever is used on the LAN. This provides the guest
          VM full incoming & outgoing net access just like a physical machine.




          Using virsh to Create Bridge



          According to RHEL Documentation, you can use virsh to create a bridge, e.g. br0 bridge based on the eth0 interface:



          # virsh iface-bridge eth0 br0


          Should you want/need to remove the bridge, do



          # virsh iface-unbridge br0


          Creating network initscripts



          If that doesn't work the way you need it to be, create/edit the init-scripts in /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ manually. This section is directly from the libvirt documentation page:



          In the /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts directory it is neccessary to create 2 config files. The first (ifcfg-eth0) defines your physical network interface, and says that it will be part of a bridge:



          # cat > ifcfg-eth0 <<EOF
          DEVICE=eth0
          HWADDR=00:16:76:D6:C9:45
          ONBOOT=yes
          BRIDGE=br0
          NM_CONTROLLED=no
          EOF


          Obviously change the HWADDR to match your actual NIC's address. You may also wish to configure the device's MTU here using e.g. MTU=9000.



          The second config file (ifcfg-br0) defines the bridge device:



          # cat > ifcfg-br0 <<EOF
          DEVICE=br0
          TYPE=Bridge
          BOOTPROTO=dhcp
          ONBOOT=yes
          DELAY=0
          NM_CONTROLLED=no
          EOF


          WARNING: The line TYPE=Bridge is case-sensitive - it must have uppercase 'B' and lower case 'ridge'



          After changing this restart networking (or simply reboot)



           # service network restart


          The final step is to disable netfilter on the bridge:



           # cat >> /etc/sysctl.conf <<EOF
          net.bridge.bridge-nf-call-ip6tables = 0
          net.bridge.bridge-nf-call-iptables = 0
          net.bridge.bridge-nf-call-arptables = 0
          EOF
          # sysctl -p /etc/sysctl.conf


          It is recommended to do this for performance and security reasons. See Fedora bug #512206. Alternatively you can configure iptables to allow all traffic to be forwarded across the bridge:



          # echo "-I FORWARD -m physdev --physdev-is-bridged -j ACCEPT" > /etc/sysconfig/iptables-forward-bridged
          # lokkit --custom-rules=ipv4:filter:/etc/sysconfig/iptables-forward-bridged
          # service libvirtd reload


          NetworManager and Bridging



          Though I'm not sure if this is still true, as there's active development, NetworkManager does not support bridging. Therefore, it may be necessary to disable it and use the network service instead:



          # chkconfig NetworkManager off
          # chkconfig network on
          # service NetworkManager stop
          # service network start


          So, once you create the "bridge" interface, enslave the physical NIC to it as outlined within the documentation, then you need to edit the Virtual Guest's configuration to enslave its NIC to the bridge on the host as well.



          ...
          <devices>
          ...
          <interface type='bridge'>
          <source bridge='br0'/>
          </interface>
          <interface type='bridge'>
          <source bridge='br1'/>
          <target dev='vnet7'/>
          <mac address="00:11:22:33:44:55"/>
          </interface>
          ...
          </devices>


          Once that's done, the router, to which your host's physical NIC is connected, will assign addresses via DHCP to the bridged interfaces--both for the host and/or the guest.







          There's a Q&A on Serverfault that might be helpful in getting the guest configuration set up. Essentially, using virsh (assuming you're working with libvirt), do



          virsh net-list
          virsh net-edit $NETWORKNAME


          Look for the dhcp section and edit to something like this



          <dhcp>
          <range start='192.168.122.100' end='192.168.122.254'/>
          <host mac='52:54:00:6c:3c:01' name='vm1' ip='192.168.122.11'/>
          <host mac='52:54:00:6c:3c:02' name='vm2' ip='192.168.122.12'/>
          <host mac='52:54:00:6c:3c:03' name='vm3' ip='192.168.122.12'/>
          </dhcp>


          Note: There might be a "hosts" file in /var/lib/libvirt/dnsmasq/ with existing mappings.



          nl /var/lib/libvirt/dnsmasq/myvirtnet.lan.hostsfile 
          1 52:54:00:39:ae:1c,192.168.122.242,minirhel.myvirtnet
          2 52:54:00:9b:0a:42,192.168.122.133,rhel7.myvirtnet
          3 52:54:00:f9:1e:45,192.168.122.134,rhel7.myvirtnet
          4 52:54:00:b0:d5:38,192.168.122.205,redqcow.myvirtnet
          5 52:54:00:af:c4:9c,192.168.122.206,redqcow.myvirtnet







          share|improve this answer




























          • Thank you. Does the physical router that the physical host is attached to via Ethernet cable need to have dhcp activated? And also, starting with a clean installation of CentOS on the host, how should the host's Ethernet connection to the external physical network be configured in CentOS?

            – CodeMed
            Mar 25 '17 at 4:05













          • I think the route would have to have DHCP enabled. You may be able to set a static IP on the router side, though I'm not certain. You should try using DHCP and check the router for the give IPs and the respective MAC addresses. That way you could always try to assign Static IPs using those MAC addresses.

            – ILMostro_7
            Mar 25 '17 at 17:21











          • I am carefully decomposing all that you were kind enough to write. Thank you. But I notice that you are propagating confusion about NetworkManager and bridging. Such confusion is what makes the many google results on this topic confusing and error-prone. While I cannot confirm or deny how NetworkManager and virsh interact with bridges, this link seems to indicate that NetworkManager can create and manage bridges.

            – CodeMed
            Mar 26 '17 at 16:37











          • @CodeMed the reason I mentioned the issue with bridging and NetworkManager is because that's in the RHEL docs. However, I recall seeing somewhere that NetworkManager had, indeed, received the necessary updates for bridging to work properly; hence my additional quip about ongoing development in NetworkManager.

            – ILMostro_7
            Mar 27 '17 at 7:48














          0














          0










          0









          According to libvirt documentation:




          Bridge to LAN



          This is the recommended config for general guest connectivity on hosts
          with static wired networking configs.



          Provides a bridge from the VM directly to the LAN. This assumes there
          is a bridge device on the host which has one or more of the hosts
          physical NICs enslaved. The guest VM will have an associated tun
          device created with a name of vnetN, which can also be overridden with
          the element (see overriding the target element). The tun
          device will be enslaved to the bridge. The IP range / network
          configuration is whatever is used on the LAN. This provides the guest
          VM full incoming & outgoing net access just like a physical machine.




          Using virsh to Create Bridge



          According to RHEL Documentation, you can use virsh to create a bridge, e.g. br0 bridge based on the eth0 interface:



          # virsh iface-bridge eth0 br0


          Should you want/need to remove the bridge, do



          # virsh iface-unbridge br0


          Creating network initscripts



          If that doesn't work the way you need it to be, create/edit the init-scripts in /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ manually. This section is directly from the libvirt documentation page:



          In the /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts directory it is neccessary to create 2 config files. The first (ifcfg-eth0) defines your physical network interface, and says that it will be part of a bridge:



          # cat > ifcfg-eth0 <<EOF
          DEVICE=eth0
          HWADDR=00:16:76:D6:C9:45
          ONBOOT=yes
          BRIDGE=br0
          NM_CONTROLLED=no
          EOF


          Obviously change the HWADDR to match your actual NIC's address. You may also wish to configure the device's MTU here using e.g. MTU=9000.



          The second config file (ifcfg-br0) defines the bridge device:



          # cat > ifcfg-br0 <<EOF
          DEVICE=br0
          TYPE=Bridge
          BOOTPROTO=dhcp
          ONBOOT=yes
          DELAY=0
          NM_CONTROLLED=no
          EOF


          WARNING: The line TYPE=Bridge is case-sensitive - it must have uppercase 'B' and lower case 'ridge'



          After changing this restart networking (or simply reboot)



           # service network restart


          The final step is to disable netfilter on the bridge:



           # cat >> /etc/sysctl.conf <<EOF
          net.bridge.bridge-nf-call-ip6tables = 0
          net.bridge.bridge-nf-call-iptables = 0
          net.bridge.bridge-nf-call-arptables = 0
          EOF
          # sysctl -p /etc/sysctl.conf


          It is recommended to do this for performance and security reasons. See Fedora bug #512206. Alternatively you can configure iptables to allow all traffic to be forwarded across the bridge:



          # echo "-I FORWARD -m physdev --physdev-is-bridged -j ACCEPT" > /etc/sysconfig/iptables-forward-bridged
          # lokkit --custom-rules=ipv4:filter:/etc/sysconfig/iptables-forward-bridged
          # service libvirtd reload


          NetworManager and Bridging



          Though I'm not sure if this is still true, as there's active development, NetworkManager does not support bridging. Therefore, it may be necessary to disable it and use the network service instead:



          # chkconfig NetworkManager off
          # chkconfig network on
          # service NetworkManager stop
          # service network start


          So, once you create the "bridge" interface, enslave the physical NIC to it as outlined within the documentation, then you need to edit the Virtual Guest's configuration to enslave its NIC to the bridge on the host as well.



          ...
          <devices>
          ...
          <interface type='bridge'>
          <source bridge='br0'/>
          </interface>
          <interface type='bridge'>
          <source bridge='br1'/>
          <target dev='vnet7'/>
          <mac address="00:11:22:33:44:55"/>
          </interface>
          ...
          </devices>


          Once that's done, the router, to which your host's physical NIC is connected, will assign addresses via DHCP to the bridged interfaces--both for the host and/or the guest.







          There's a Q&A on Serverfault that might be helpful in getting the guest configuration set up. Essentially, using virsh (assuming you're working with libvirt), do



          virsh net-list
          virsh net-edit $NETWORKNAME


          Look for the dhcp section and edit to something like this



          <dhcp>
          <range start='192.168.122.100' end='192.168.122.254'/>
          <host mac='52:54:00:6c:3c:01' name='vm1' ip='192.168.122.11'/>
          <host mac='52:54:00:6c:3c:02' name='vm2' ip='192.168.122.12'/>
          <host mac='52:54:00:6c:3c:03' name='vm3' ip='192.168.122.12'/>
          </dhcp>


          Note: There might be a "hosts" file in /var/lib/libvirt/dnsmasq/ with existing mappings.



          nl /var/lib/libvirt/dnsmasq/myvirtnet.lan.hostsfile 
          1 52:54:00:39:ae:1c,192.168.122.242,minirhel.myvirtnet
          2 52:54:00:9b:0a:42,192.168.122.133,rhel7.myvirtnet
          3 52:54:00:f9:1e:45,192.168.122.134,rhel7.myvirtnet
          4 52:54:00:b0:d5:38,192.168.122.205,redqcow.myvirtnet
          5 52:54:00:af:c4:9c,192.168.122.206,redqcow.myvirtnet







          share|improve this answer















          According to libvirt documentation:




          Bridge to LAN



          This is the recommended config for general guest connectivity on hosts
          with static wired networking configs.



          Provides a bridge from the VM directly to the LAN. This assumes there
          is a bridge device on the host which has one or more of the hosts
          physical NICs enslaved. The guest VM will have an associated tun
          device created with a name of vnetN, which can also be overridden with
          the element (see overriding the target element). The tun
          device will be enslaved to the bridge. The IP range / network
          configuration is whatever is used on the LAN. This provides the guest
          VM full incoming & outgoing net access just like a physical machine.




          Using virsh to Create Bridge



          According to RHEL Documentation, you can use virsh to create a bridge, e.g. br0 bridge based on the eth0 interface:



          # virsh iface-bridge eth0 br0


          Should you want/need to remove the bridge, do



          # virsh iface-unbridge br0


          Creating network initscripts



          If that doesn't work the way you need it to be, create/edit the init-scripts in /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ manually. This section is directly from the libvirt documentation page:



          In the /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts directory it is neccessary to create 2 config files. The first (ifcfg-eth0) defines your physical network interface, and says that it will be part of a bridge:



          # cat > ifcfg-eth0 <<EOF
          DEVICE=eth0
          HWADDR=00:16:76:D6:C9:45
          ONBOOT=yes
          BRIDGE=br0
          NM_CONTROLLED=no
          EOF


          Obviously change the HWADDR to match your actual NIC's address. You may also wish to configure the device's MTU here using e.g. MTU=9000.



          The second config file (ifcfg-br0) defines the bridge device:



          # cat > ifcfg-br0 <<EOF
          DEVICE=br0
          TYPE=Bridge
          BOOTPROTO=dhcp
          ONBOOT=yes
          DELAY=0
          NM_CONTROLLED=no
          EOF


          WARNING: The line TYPE=Bridge is case-sensitive - it must have uppercase 'B' and lower case 'ridge'



          After changing this restart networking (or simply reboot)



           # service network restart


          The final step is to disable netfilter on the bridge:



           # cat >> /etc/sysctl.conf <<EOF
          net.bridge.bridge-nf-call-ip6tables = 0
          net.bridge.bridge-nf-call-iptables = 0
          net.bridge.bridge-nf-call-arptables = 0
          EOF
          # sysctl -p /etc/sysctl.conf


          It is recommended to do this for performance and security reasons. See Fedora bug #512206. Alternatively you can configure iptables to allow all traffic to be forwarded across the bridge:



          # echo "-I FORWARD -m physdev --physdev-is-bridged -j ACCEPT" > /etc/sysconfig/iptables-forward-bridged
          # lokkit --custom-rules=ipv4:filter:/etc/sysconfig/iptables-forward-bridged
          # service libvirtd reload


          NetworManager and Bridging



          Though I'm not sure if this is still true, as there's active development, NetworkManager does not support bridging. Therefore, it may be necessary to disable it and use the network service instead:



          # chkconfig NetworkManager off
          # chkconfig network on
          # service NetworkManager stop
          # service network start


          So, once you create the "bridge" interface, enslave the physical NIC to it as outlined within the documentation, then you need to edit the Virtual Guest's configuration to enslave its NIC to the bridge on the host as well.



          ...
          <devices>
          ...
          <interface type='bridge'>
          <source bridge='br0'/>
          </interface>
          <interface type='bridge'>
          <source bridge='br1'/>
          <target dev='vnet7'/>
          <mac address="00:11:22:33:44:55"/>
          </interface>
          ...
          </devices>


          Once that's done, the router, to which your host's physical NIC is connected, will assign addresses via DHCP to the bridged interfaces--both for the host and/or the guest.







          There's a Q&A on Serverfault that might be helpful in getting the guest configuration set up. Essentially, using virsh (assuming you're working with libvirt), do



          virsh net-list
          virsh net-edit $NETWORKNAME


          Look for the dhcp section and edit to something like this



          <dhcp>
          <range start='192.168.122.100' end='192.168.122.254'/>
          <host mac='52:54:00:6c:3c:01' name='vm1' ip='192.168.122.11'/>
          <host mac='52:54:00:6c:3c:02' name='vm2' ip='192.168.122.12'/>
          <host mac='52:54:00:6c:3c:03' name='vm3' ip='192.168.122.12'/>
          </dhcp>


          Note: There might be a "hosts" file in /var/lib/libvirt/dnsmasq/ with existing mappings.



          nl /var/lib/libvirt/dnsmasq/myvirtnet.lan.hostsfile 
          1 52:54:00:39:ae:1c,192.168.122.242,minirhel.myvirtnet
          2 52:54:00:9b:0a:42,192.168.122.133,rhel7.myvirtnet
          3 52:54:00:f9:1e:45,192.168.122.134,rhel7.myvirtnet
          4 52:54:00:b0:d5:38,192.168.122.205,redqcow.myvirtnet
          5 52:54:00:af:c4:9c,192.168.122.206,redqcow.myvirtnet








          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited Apr 13 '17 at 12:13









          Community

          1




          1










          answered Mar 25 '17 at 2:19









          ILMostro_7ILMostro_7

          1,75615 silver badges22 bronze badges




          1,75615 silver badges22 bronze badges
















          • Thank you. Does the physical router that the physical host is attached to via Ethernet cable need to have dhcp activated? And also, starting with a clean installation of CentOS on the host, how should the host's Ethernet connection to the external physical network be configured in CentOS?

            – CodeMed
            Mar 25 '17 at 4:05













          • I think the route would have to have DHCP enabled. You may be able to set a static IP on the router side, though I'm not certain. You should try using DHCP and check the router for the give IPs and the respective MAC addresses. That way you could always try to assign Static IPs using those MAC addresses.

            – ILMostro_7
            Mar 25 '17 at 17:21











          • I am carefully decomposing all that you were kind enough to write. Thank you. But I notice that you are propagating confusion about NetworkManager and bridging. Such confusion is what makes the many google results on this topic confusing and error-prone. While I cannot confirm or deny how NetworkManager and virsh interact with bridges, this link seems to indicate that NetworkManager can create and manage bridges.

            – CodeMed
            Mar 26 '17 at 16:37











          • @CodeMed the reason I mentioned the issue with bridging and NetworkManager is because that's in the RHEL docs. However, I recall seeing somewhere that NetworkManager had, indeed, received the necessary updates for bridging to work properly; hence my additional quip about ongoing development in NetworkManager.

            – ILMostro_7
            Mar 27 '17 at 7:48



















          • Thank you. Does the physical router that the physical host is attached to via Ethernet cable need to have dhcp activated? And also, starting with a clean installation of CentOS on the host, how should the host's Ethernet connection to the external physical network be configured in CentOS?

            – CodeMed
            Mar 25 '17 at 4:05













          • I think the route would have to have DHCP enabled. You may be able to set a static IP on the router side, though I'm not certain. You should try using DHCP and check the router for the give IPs and the respective MAC addresses. That way you could always try to assign Static IPs using those MAC addresses.

            – ILMostro_7
            Mar 25 '17 at 17:21











          • I am carefully decomposing all that you were kind enough to write. Thank you. But I notice that you are propagating confusion about NetworkManager and bridging. Such confusion is what makes the many google results on this topic confusing and error-prone. While I cannot confirm or deny how NetworkManager and virsh interact with bridges, this link seems to indicate that NetworkManager can create and manage bridges.

            – CodeMed
            Mar 26 '17 at 16:37











          • @CodeMed the reason I mentioned the issue with bridging and NetworkManager is because that's in the RHEL docs. However, I recall seeing somewhere that NetworkManager had, indeed, received the necessary updates for bridging to work properly; hence my additional quip about ongoing development in NetworkManager.

            – ILMostro_7
            Mar 27 '17 at 7:48

















          Thank you. Does the physical router that the physical host is attached to via Ethernet cable need to have dhcp activated? And also, starting with a clean installation of CentOS on the host, how should the host's Ethernet connection to the external physical network be configured in CentOS?

          – CodeMed
          Mar 25 '17 at 4:05







          Thank you. Does the physical router that the physical host is attached to via Ethernet cable need to have dhcp activated? And also, starting with a clean installation of CentOS on the host, how should the host's Ethernet connection to the external physical network be configured in CentOS?

          – CodeMed
          Mar 25 '17 at 4:05















          I think the route would have to have DHCP enabled. You may be able to set a static IP on the router side, though I'm not certain. You should try using DHCP and check the router for the give IPs and the respective MAC addresses. That way you could always try to assign Static IPs using those MAC addresses.

          – ILMostro_7
          Mar 25 '17 at 17:21





          I think the route would have to have DHCP enabled. You may be able to set a static IP on the router side, though I'm not certain. You should try using DHCP and check the router for the give IPs and the respective MAC addresses. That way you could always try to assign Static IPs using those MAC addresses.

          – ILMostro_7
          Mar 25 '17 at 17:21













          I am carefully decomposing all that you were kind enough to write. Thank you. But I notice that you are propagating confusion about NetworkManager and bridging. Such confusion is what makes the many google results on this topic confusing and error-prone. While I cannot confirm or deny how NetworkManager and virsh interact with bridges, this link seems to indicate that NetworkManager can create and manage bridges.

          – CodeMed
          Mar 26 '17 at 16:37





          I am carefully decomposing all that you were kind enough to write. Thank you. But I notice that you are propagating confusion about NetworkManager and bridging. Such confusion is what makes the many google results on this topic confusing and error-prone. While I cannot confirm or deny how NetworkManager and virsh interact with bridges, this link seems to indicate that NetworkManager can create and manage bridges.

          – CodeMed
          Mar 26 '17 at 16:37













          @CodeMed the reason I mentioned the issue with bridging and NetworkManager is because that's in the RHEL docs. However, I recall seeing somewhere that NetworkManager had, indeed, received the necessary updates for bridging to work properly; hence my additional quip about ongoing development in NetworkManager.

          – ILMostro_7
          Mar 27 '17 at 7:48





          @CodeMed the reason I mentioned the issue with bridging and NetworkManager is because that's in the RHEL docs. However, I recall seeing somewhere that NetworkManager had, indeed, received the necessary updates for bridging to work properly; hence my additional quip about ongoing development in NetworkManager.

          – ILMostro_7
          Mar 27 '17 at 7:48



















          draft saved

          draft discarded



















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Unix & Linux Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f353697%2fhow-do-i-assign-static-ips-for-host-bridge-and-guest%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Taj Mahal Inhaltsverzeichnis Aufbau | Geschichte | 350-Jahr-Feier | Heutige Bedeutung | Siehe auch |...

          Baia Sprie Cuprins Etimologie | Istorie | Demografie | Politică și administrație | Arii naturale...

          Nicolae Petrescu-Găină Cuprins Biografie | Opera | In memoriam | Varia | Controverse, incertitudini...