How to execute a project with two resources where you need three resources?How to balance tasks in Project...

A fantasy saga with big bad trees that suddenly appear, and make demons appear

How could "aggressor" pilots fly foreign aircraft without speaking the language?

What kind of tools would be used to carve bone?

How to temporarily replace Latin characters with Greek

70's/80's story about a high ranking prisoner of war on a prison planet

How can I curtail abuse of the Illusion wizard's Illusory Reality feature?

Always show full URL in Safari address bar

Can one use mythology to study the history of a region?

Is any device installed on airplane to measure wind speed relative to the ground, and its direction?

Sanitise a high score table to remove offensive terms / usernames

Test if two food are the same

Fill the Image Sequence Ep. 2

A sentient carnivorous species trying to preserve life. How could they find a new food source?

Does journal access significantly influence choice in which journal to publish in?

How do you translate "Don't Fear the Reaper" into Latin?

Closest thing to Infinity Gauntlet in DnD5e

What is this cast-iron device on my water supply pipe?

What is the meaning of "log" in "hours logged"?

Does the Creighton Method of Natural Family Planning have a failure rate of 3.2% or less?

Adding elements to some sublists of unequal length

Why did a young George Washington sign a document admitting to assassinating a French military officer?

Creating chess engine, machine learning vs. traditional engine?

How to discipline overeager engineer

Chain with double bond or triple bond



How to execute a project with two resources where you need three resources?


How to balance tasks in Project based on resources?How can I make company-wide scheduling and resource allocation decisions?In project management, How might you adjust the project if you don’t have resources when you need them?Is keeping two project plans ever appropriate?What is the procedure for adjusting the project schedule when a team member is replaced?How can I calculate required project resources with less manual computation?How would you implement scrumban to large team performing concurrent multiple R&D projectsHow do I manage resources with non-standard hours in MS-project?Delivering a project with limited resources?Microsoft Project: How to make two resources work at the same time on the same task when using automatic resource leveling?






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{
margin-bottom:0;
}
.everyonelovesstackoverflow{position:absolute;height:1px;width:1px;opacity:0;top:0;left:0;pointer-events:none;}








2

















Recently, I participated in a Project Manager interview and the following question were raised. What would be the correct answer for that?



A software development project is needed three resources to complete within three months. The head of the PMO can only allocate two resources to execute the project. The client is not acceptable to extend the schedule or descope the original scope. Developers are also not available to work extra hours due to their engagements. What steps you will take to manage the project.










share|improve this question






















  • 2





    This is like saying, "Doctor, it hurts when I punch myself in the face." I'm pretty sure the only sound medical advice in that kind of circumstance is: Don't do that!

    – Todd A. Jacobs
    4 hours ago




















2

















Recently, I participated in a Project Manager interview and the following question were raised. What would be the correct answer for that?



A software development project is needed three resources to complete within three months. The head of the PMO can only allocate two resources to execute the project. The client is not acceptable to extend the schedule or descope the original scope. Developers are also not available to work extra hours due to their engagements. What steps you will take to manage the project.










share|improve this question






















  • 2





    This is like saying, "Doctor, it hurts when I punch myself in the face." I'm pretty sure the only sound medical advice in that kind of circumstance is: Don't do that!

    – Todd A. Jacobs
    4 hours ago
















2












2








2


1






Recently, I participated in a Project Manager interview and the following question were raised. What would be the correct answer for that?



A software development project is needed three resources to complete within three months. The head of the PMO can only allocate two resources to execute the project. The client is not acceptable to extend the schedule or descope the original scope. Developers are also not available to work extra hours due to their engagements. What steps you will take to manage the project.










share|improve this question














Recently, I participated in a Project Manager interview and the following question were raised. What would be the correct answer for that?



A software development project is needed three resources to complete within three months. The head of the PMO can only allocate two resources to execute the project. The client is not acceptable to extend the schedule or descope the original scope. Developers are also not available to work extra hours due to their engagements. What steps you will take to manage the project.







resource-planning






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question



share|improve this question










asked 9 hours ago









Pesil Pesil

736 bronze badges




736 bronze badges











  • 2





    This is like saying, "Doctor, it hurts when I punch myself in the face." I'm pretty sure the only sound medical advice in that kind of circumstance is: Don't do that!

    – Todd A. Jacobs
    4 hours ago
















  • 2





    This is like saying, "Doctor, it hurts when I punch myself in the face." I'm pretty sure the only sound medical advice in that kind of circumstance is: Don't do that!

    – Todd A. Jacobs
    4 hours ago










2




2





This is like saying, "Doctor, it hurts when I punch myself in the face." I'm pretty sure the only sound medical advice in that kind of circumstance is: Don't do that!

– Todd A. Jacobs
4 hours ago







This is like saying, "Doctor, it hurts when I punch myself in the face." I'm pretty sure the only sound medical advice in that kind of circumstance is: Don't do that!

– Todd A. Jacobs
4 hours ago












3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















2


















So there are usually several parameters on a project that can vary:




  1. Budget

  2. Schedule

  3. Scope

  4. Risk

  5. Resources

  6. Quality


You've ruled out three of them, so think abut what the others can do:




  • Sacrifice quality.

  • Blow out the budget.

  • Increase the risk of not finishing (or some other risk).


Triple constraint in PM






share|improve this answer



























  • Interesting. I've never seen this as a six-sided star. I guess usually Resources and Budget are grouped together, as are Scope and Quality, and finally Risk and Schedule. However, since all 3 corners of the resulting triangles have been deemed unnegotiable, I guess looking at the finer details makes sense...

    – Llewellyn
    5 hours ago






  • 1





    I'm pretty certain that the intent of the question was to block all possible solutions. I suspect saying, for example, "I'll hire contractors" would be met with a simple "denied". This is a kobayashi maru interview question.

    – Daniel
    5 hours ago



















2


















If this is an interview question, I'm fairly certain that what they were looking for was how you handle being presented an impossible scenario.



Effectively what they asked you was this: You have a project that will be 2/3 done at the end of the project. You may change nothing. What do you do?



They want to see how you handle the situation.






share|improve this answer


































    1


















    The information in the Peter's answer is correct. The way the interviewer has asked the question, a number of options have already been taken away. The customer has communicated that they don't want to cut scope (quality) or push out timelines, and the developers cannot work more hours.



    The only option left is to hire additional resources (presumably outside the organization) to complete the work, which would affect your budget. If increasing the budget is not an option, then adding a risk is an option. Stating that it's possible you won't successfully complete the project due to being understaffed and being constrained on scope, schedule, and resource availability. The second option (increased risk) would be undesirable as you are essentially kicking the can down the road and hoping that everything will go better than expected, which is not an effective strategy.






    share|improve this answer









    New contributor



    Nathan M is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.























      Your Answer








      StackExchange.ready(function() {
      var channelOptions = {
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "208"
      };
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
      createEditor();
      });
      }
      else {
      createEditor();
      }
      });

      function createEditor() {
      StackExchange.prepareEditor({
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: false,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: null,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader: {
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/"u003ecc by-sa 4.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      },
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      });


      }
      });















      draft saved

      draft discarded
















      StackExchange.ready(
      function () {
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpm.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f27283%2fhow-to-execute-a-project-with-two-resources-where-you-need-three-resources%23new-answer', 'question_page');
      }
      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes








      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      2


















      So there are usually several parameters on a project that can vary:




      1. Budget

      2. Schedule

      3. Scope

      4. Risk

      5. Resources

      6. Quality


      You've ruled out three of them, so think abut what the others can do:




      • Sacrifice quality.

      • Blow out the budget.

      • Increase the risk of not finishing (or some other risk).


      Triple constraint in PM






      share|improve this answer



























      • Interesting. I've never seen this as a six-sided star. I guess usually Resources and Budget are grouped together, as are Scope and Quality, and finally Risk and Schedule. However, since all 3 corners of the resulting triangles have been deemed unnegotiable, I guess looking at the finer details makes sense...

        – Llewellyn
        5 hours ago






      • 1





        I'm pretty certain that the intent of the question was to block all possible solutions. I suspect saying, for example, "I'll hire contractors" would be met with a simple "denied". This is a kobayashi maru interview question.

        – Daniel
        5 hours ago
















      2


















      So there are usually several parameters on a project that can vary:




      1. Budget

      2. Schedule

      3. Scope

      4. Risk

      5. Resources

      6. Quality


      You've ruled out three of them, so think abut what the others can do:




      • Sacrifice quality.

      • Blow out the budget.

      • Increase the risk of not finishing (or some other risk).


      Triple constraint in PM






      share|improve this answer



























      • Interesting. I've never seen this as a six-sided star. I guess usually Resources and Budget are grouped together, as are Scope and Quality, and finally Risk and Schedule. However, since all 3 corners of the resulting triangles have been deemed unnegotiable, I guess looking at the finer details makes sense...

        – Llewellyn
        5 hours ago






      • 1





        I'm pretty certain that the intent of the question was to block all possible solutions. I suspect saying, for example, "I'll hire contractors" would be met with a simple "denied". This is a kobayashi maru interview question.

        – Daniel
        5 hours ago














      2














      2










      2









      So there are usually several parameters on a project that can vary:




      1. Budget

      2. Schedule

      3. Scope

      4. Risk

      5. Resources

      6. Quality


      You've ruled out three of them, so think abut what the others can do:




      • Sacrifice quality.

      • Blow out the budget.

      • Increase the risk of not finishing (or some other risk).


      Triple constraint in PM






      share|improve this answer














      So there are usually several parameters on a project that can vary:




      1. Budget

      2. Schedule

      3. Scope

      4. Risk

      5. Resources

      6. Quality


      You've ruled out three of them, so think abut what the others can do:




      • Sacrifice quality.

      • Blow out the budget.

      • Increase the risk of not finishing (or some other risk).


      Triple constraint in PM







      share|improve this answer













      share|improve this answer




      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer










      answered 8 hours ago









      Peter K.Peter K.

      3572 silver badges9 bronze badges




      3572 silver badges9 bronze badges
















      • Interesting. I've never seen this as a six-sided star. I guess usually Resources and Budget are grouped together, as are Scope and Quality, and finally Risk and Schedule. However, since all 3 corners of the resulting triangles have been deemed unnegotiable, I guess looking at the finer details makes sense...

        – Llewellyn
        5 hours ago






      • 1





        I'm pretty certain that the intent of the question was to block all possible solutions. I suspect saying, for example, "I'll hire contractors" would be met with a simple "denied". This is a kobayashi maru interview question.

        – Daniel
        5 hours ago



















      • Interesting. I've never seen this as a six-sided star. I guess usually Resources and Budget are grouped together, as are Scope and Quality, and finally Risk and Schedule. However, since all 3 corners of the resulting triangles have been deemed unnegotiable, I guess looking at the finer details makes sense...

        – Llewellyn
        5 hours ago






      • 1





        I'm pretty certain that the intent of the question was to block all possible solutions. I suspect saying, for example, "I'll hire contractors" would be met with a simple "denied". This is a kobayashi maru interview question.

        – Daniel
        5 hours ago

















      Interesting. I've never seen this as a six-sided star. I guess usually Resources and Budget are grouped together, as are Scope and Quality, and finally Risk and Schedule. However, since all 3 corners of the resulting triangles have been deemed unnegotiable, I guess looking at the finer details makes sense...

      – Llewellyn
      5 hours ago





      Interesting. I've never seen this as a six-sided star. I guess usually Resources and Budget are grouped together, as are Scope and Quality, and finally Risk and Schedule. However, since all 3 corners of the resulting triangles have been deemed unnegotiable, I guess looking at the finer details makes sense...

      – Llewellyn
      5 hours ago




      1




      1





      I'm pretty certain that the intent of the question was to block all possible solutions. I suspect saying, for example, "I'll hire contractors" would be met with a simple "denied". This is a kobayashi maru interview question.

      – Daniel
      5 hours ago





      I'm pretty certain that the intent of the question was to block all possible solutions. I suspect saying, for example, "I'll hire contractors" would be met with a simple "denied". This is a kobayashi maru interview question.

      – Daniel
      5 hours ago













      2


















      If this is an interview question, I'm fairly certain that what they were looking for was how you handle being presented an impossible scenario.



      Effectively what they asked you was this: You have a project that will be 2/3 done at the end of the project. You may change nothing. What do you do?



      They want to see how you handle the situation.






      share|improve this answer































        2


















        If this is an interview question, I'm fairly certain that what they were looking for was how you handle being presented an impossible scenario.



        Effectively what they asked you was this: You have a project that will be 2/3 done at the end of the project. You may change nothing. What do you do?



        They want to see how you handle the situation.






        share|improve this answer





























          2














          2










          2









          If this is an interview question, I'm fairly certain that what they were looking for was how you handle being presented an impossible scenario.



          Effectively what they asked you was this: You have a project that will be 2/3 done at the end of the project. You may change nothing. What do you do?



          They want to see how you handle the situation.






          share|improve this answer














          If this is an interview question, I'm fairly certain that what they were looking for was how you handle being presented an impossible scenario.



          Effectively what they asked you was this: You have a project that will be 2/3 done at the end of the project. You may change nothing. What do you do?



          They want to see how you handle the situation.







          share|improve this answer













          share|improve this answer




          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered 5 hours ago









          DanielDaniel

          11.6k2 gold badges13 silver badges31 bronze badges




          11.6k2 gold badges13 silver badges31 bronze badges


























              1


















              The information in the Peter's answer is correct. The way the interviewer has asked the question, a number of options have already been taken away. The customer has communicated that they don't want to cut scope (quality) or push out timelines, and the developers cannot work more hours.



              The only option left is to hire additional resources (presumably outside the organization) to complete the work, which would affect your budget. If increasing the budget is not an option, then adding a risk is an option. Stating that it's possible you won't successfully complete the project due to being understaffed and being constrained on scope, schedule, and resource availability. The second option (increased risk) would be undesirable as you are essentially kicking the can down the road and hoping that everything will go better than expected, which is not an effective strategy.






              share|improve this answer









              New contributor



              Nathan M is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
              Check out our Code of Conduct.


























                1


















                The information in the Peter's answer is correct. The way the interviewer has asked the question, a number of options have already been taken away. The customer has communicated that they don't want to cut scope (quality) or push out timelines, and the developers cannot work more hours.



                The only option left is to hire additional resources (presumably outside the organization) to complete the work, which would affect your budget. If increasing the budget is not an option, then adding a risk is an option. Stating that it's possible you won't successfully complete the project due to being understaffed and being constrained on scope, schedule, and resource availability. The second option (increased risk) would be undesirable as you are essentially kicking the can down the road and hoping that everything will go better than expected, which is not an effective strategy.






                share|improve this answer









                New contributor



                Nathan M is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                Check out our Code of Conduct.
























                  1














                  1










                  1









                  The information in the Peter's answer is correct. The way the interviewer has asked the question, a number of options have already been taken away. The customer has communicated that they don't want to cut scope (quality) or push out timelines, and the developers cannot work more hours.



                  The only option left is to hire additional resources (presumably outside the organization) to complete the work, which would affect your budget. If increasing the budget is not an option, then adding a risk is an option. Stating that it's possible you won't successfully complete the project due to being understaffed and being constrained on scope, schedule, and resource availability. The second option (increased risk) would be undesirable as you are essentially kicking the can down the road and hoping that everything will go better than expected, which is not an effective strategy.






                  share|improve this answer









                  New contributor



                  Nathan M is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.









                  The information in the Peter's answer is correct. The way the interviewer has asked the question, a number of options have already been taken away. The customer has communicated that they don't want to cut scope (quality) or push out timelines, and the developers cannot work more hours.



                  The only option left is to hire additional resources (presumably outside the organization) to complete the work, which would affect your budget. If increasing the budget is not an option, then adding a risk is an option. Stating that it's possible you won't successfully complete the project due to being understaffed and being constrained on scope, schedule, and resource availability. The second option (increased risk) would be undesirable as you are essentially kicking the can down the road and hoping that everything will go better than expected, which is not an effective strategy.







                  share|improve this answer









                  New contributor



                  Nathan M is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.








                  share|improve this answer




                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer






                  New contributor



                  Nathan M is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.








                  answered 5 hours ago









                  Nathan MNathan M

                  112 bronze badges




                  112 bronze badges




                  New contributor



                  Nathan M is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.




                  New contributor




                  Nathan M is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.




































                      draft saved

                      draft discarded



















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Project Management Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function () {
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpm.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f27283%2fhow-to-execute-a-project-with-two-resources-where-you-need-three-resources%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                      }
                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Hudson River Historic District Contents Geography History The district today Aesthetics Cultural...

                      The number designs the writing. Feandra Aversely Definition: The act of ingrafting a sprig or shoot of one...

                      Ayherre Geografie Demografie Externe links Navigatiemenu43° 23′ NB, 1° 15′ WL43° 23′ NB, 1°...