How can I set the aperture on my DSLR when it's attached to a telescope instead of a lens? ...
Should a wizard buy fine inks every time he want to copy spells into his spellbook?
How to run automated tests after each commit?
Is CEO the "profession" with the most psychopaths?
What are the discoveries that have been possible with the rejection of positivism?
What do you call the main part of a joke?
Amount of permutations on an NxNxN Rubik's Cube
Did any compiler fully use 80-bit floating point?
Project Euler #1 in C++
Why weren't discrete x86 CPUs ever used in game hardware?
How to write capital alpha?
How would a mousetrap for use in space work?
The test team as an enemy of development? And how can this be avoided?
What does this say in Elvish?
Drawing spherical mirrors
One-one communication
Trademark violation for app?
If Windows 7 doesn't support WSL, then what is "Subsystem for UNIX-based Applications"?
Why do early math courses focus on the cross sections of a cone and not on other 3D objects?
Why are vacuum tubes still used in amateur radios?
Is there hard evidence that the grant peer review system performs significantly better than random?
How does the math work when buying airline miles?
Can the Flaming Sphere spell be rammed into multiple Tiny creatures that are in the same 5-foot square?
Misunderstanding of Sylow theory
How to compare two different files line by line in unix?
How can I set the aperture on my DSLR when it's attached to a telescope instead of a lens?
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern)
Proposal: Rules for *New* Photo Contest on Main SiteCan I shoot a photo with my DSLR without the lens on?Why does my DSLR's viewfinder ignore the aperture ring on a legacy lens?DSLRs with separate controls for aperture and shutter?How to calculate the size of the image circle at infinity focus?Canon: Setting exposure compensation in M mode?Can a Samsung NX300 shoot without a lens, for attaching to a telescope?Where can I find the maximum camera weight for my lens?How do I force my Canon dSLR (800D) to take a photo?How can I achieve more clarity in my photos of the moon?How can I get consistent exposure while allowing aperture changes on Fujifilm X-T2?
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}
I would like to use my Nikon D3100 for astrophotography. I have attached the camera to my telescope with a T-ring, after which the camera recognized the absence of the lens, which is perfectly normal. However, without the lens on, I am unable to adjust the aperture, which is extremely important for astrophotography. I can set the ISO, the shutter speed, and some other, minor things but not the Aperture.
I’m using the camera in manual mode.
Is setting the aperture without the lens even possible?
dslr camera-settings astrophotography
New contributor
add a comment |
I would like to use my Nikon D3100 for astrophotography. I have attached the camera to my telescope with a T-ring, after which the camera recognized the absence of the lens, which is perfectly normal. However, without the lens on, I am unable to adjust the aperture, which is extremely important for astrophotography. I can set the ISO, the shutter speed, and some other, minor things but not the Aperture.
I’m using the camera in manual mode.
Is setting the aperture without the lens even possible?
dslr camera-settings astrophotography
New contributor
add a comment |
I would like to use my Nikon D3100 for astrophotography. I have attached the camera to my telescope with a T-ring, after which the camera recognized the absence of the lens, which is perfectly normal. However, without the lens on, I am unable to adjust the aperture, which is extremely important for astrophotography. I can set the ISO, the shutter speed, and some other, minor things but not the Aperture.
I’m using the camera in manual mode.
Is setting the aperture without the lens even possible?
dslr camera-settings astrophotography
New contributor
I would like to use my Nikon D3100 for astrophotography. I have attached the camera to my telescope with a T-ring, after which the camera recognized the absence of the lens, which is perfectly normal. However, without the lens on, I am unable to adjust the aperture, which is extremely important for astrophotography. I can set the ISO, the shutter speed, and some other, minor things but not the Aperture.
I’m using the camera in manual mode.
Is setting the aperture without the lens even possible?
dslr camera-settings astrophotography
dslr camera-settings astrophotography
New contributor
New contributor
edited 3 hours ago
Michael C
135k7154384
135k7154384
New contributor
asked 7 hours ago
Gergely KovacsGergely Kovacs
1083
1083
New contributor
New contributor
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
Is setting the aperture without the lens even possible?
Considering that the aperture is a part of the lens, not the camera body, no, it is not possible.
Telescopes do not typically have variable apertures — there's no need to stop down to limit incoming light (which is absolutely the opposite of what is wanted for star photography), and depth of field control is meaningless when all objects are no closer than the moon.
The aperture of the telescope is the diameter of the front element. In ƒ-number terms, it is the ratio of the focal length of the telescope divided by the diameter of the front element. Be sure to use the same units (i.e., inches, or mm/cm/m).
I'm not sure about OP's camera - but I know some may refuse to shoot when no aperture is selected in certain modes. Do you know if this affects the D3100?
– Hueco
4 hours ago
1
@Hueco not sure precisely. It never occurred to me to use a t-mounted camera in anything other than manual mode. I had no problems shooting manual with a D90 mounted on a telescope, nor with my D800E on a scope.
– scottbb
3 hours ago
This is not entirely true--you could use an additional aperture inline between the objective and the flange.
– chrylis
50 mins ago
1
@chrylis Well, I did use the weasel phrase "telescopes do not typically have variable apertures"... =) But regardless, the bigger point is that apertures are not a part of the camera.
– scottbb
46 mins ago
add a comment |
Check your telescope manual and find the telescope's aperture. Assuming no telescope eyepiece is utilized, the camera is said to be at the "prime focus" position. Find the scope's diameter. Find the scope's focal length. Divide focal length by diameter. The results of this math is the working f number of the system. Example: 1000mm focal length 4 inch diameter. Convert all units to millimeters. Inches to millimeters conversion is 25.4. Thus 1000 / (4 X 25.4) = 1000 / 101.6 = 9.8. Round to f/10. By the way, f/10 is typical of most systems.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "61"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Gergely Kovacs is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphoto.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f106699%2fhow-can-i-set-the-aperture-on-my-dslr-when-its-attached-to-a-telescope-instead%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Is setting the aperture without the lens even possible?
Considering that the aperture is a part of the lens, not the camera body, no, it is not possible.
Telescopes do not typically have variable apertures — there's no need to stop down to limit incoming light (which is absolutely the opposite of what is wanted for star photography), and depth of field control is meaningless when all objects are no closer than the moon.
The aperture of the telescope is the diameter of the front element. In ƒ-number terms, it is the ratio of the focal length of the telescope divided by the diameter of the front element. Be sure to use the same units (i.e., inches, or mm/cm/m).
I'm not sure about OP's camera - but I know some may refuse to shoot when no aperture is selected in certain modes. Do you know if this affects the D3100?
– Hueco
4 hours ago
1
@Hueco not sure precisely. It never occurred to me to use a t-mounted camera in anything other than manual mode. I had no problems shooting manual with a D90 mounted on a telescope, nor with my D800E on a scope.
– scottbb
3 hours ago
This is not entirely true--you could use an additional aperture inline between the objective and the flange.
– chrylis
50 mins ago
1
@chrylis Well, I did use the weasel phrase "telescopes do not typically have variable apertures"... =) But regardless, the bigger point is that apertures are not a part of the camera.
– scottbb
46 mins ago
add a comment |
Is setting the aperture without the lens even possible?
Considering that the aperture is a part of the lens, not the camera body, no, it is not possible.
Telescopes do not typically have variable apertures — there's no need to stop down to limit incoming light (which is absolutely the opposite of what is wanted for star photography), and depth of field control is meaningless when all objects are no closer than the moon.
The aperture of the telescope is the diameter of the front element. In ƒ-number terms, it is the ratio of the focal length of the telescope divided by the diameter of the front element. Be sure to use the same units (i.e., inches, or mm/cm/m).
I'm not sure about OP's camera - but I know some may refuse to shoot when no aperture is selected in certain modes. Do you know if this affects the D3100?
– Hueco
4 hours ago
1
@Hueco not sure precisely. It never occurred to me to use a t-mounted camera in anything other than manual mode. I had no problems shooting manual with a D90 mounted on a telescope, nor with my D800E on a scope.
– scottbb
3 hours ago
This is not entirely true--you could use an additional aperture inline between the objective and the flange.
– chrylis
50 mins ago
1
@chrylis Well, I did use the weasel phrase "telescopes do not typically have variable apertures"... =) But regardless, the bigger point is that apertures are not a part of the camera.
– scottbb
46 mins ago
add a comment |
Is setting the aperture without the lens even possible?
Considering that the aperture is a part of the lens, not the camera body, no, it is not possible.
Telescopes do not typically have variable apertures — there's no need to stop down to limit incoming light (which is absolutely the opposite of what is wanted for star photography), and depth of field control is meaningless when all objects are no closer than the moon.
The aperture of the telescope is the diameter of the front element. In ƒ-number terms, it is the ratio of the focal length of the telescope divided by the diameter of the front element. Be sure to use the same units (i.e., inches, or mm/cm/m).
Is setting the aperture without the lens even possible?
Considering that the aperture is a part of the lens, not the camera body, no, it is not possible.
Telescopes do not typically have variable apertures — there's no need to stop down to limit incoming light (which is absolutely the opposite of what is wanted for star photography), and depth of field control is meaningless when all objects are no closer than the moon.
The aperture of the telescope is the diameter of the front element. In ƒ-number terms, it is the ratio of the focal length of the telescope divided by the diameter of the front element. Be sure to use the same units (i.e., inches, or mm/cm/m).
edited 6 hours ago
answered 7 hours ago
scottbbscottbb
21k75896
21k75896
I'm not sure about OP's camera - but I know some may refuse to shoot when no aperture is selected in certain modes. Do you know if this affects the D3100?
– Hueco
4 hours ago
1
@Hueco not sure precisely. It never occurred to me to use a t-mounted camera in anything other than manual mode. I had no problems shooting manual with a D90 mounted on a telescope, nor with my D800E on a scope.
– scottbb
3 hours ago
This is not entirely true--you could use an additional aperture inline between the objective and the flange.
– chrylis
50 mins ago
1
@chrylis Well, I did use the weasel phrase "telescopes do not typically have variable apertures"... =) But regardless, the bigger point is that apertures are not a part of the camera.
– scottbb
46 mins ago
add a comment |
I'm not sure about OP's camera - but I know some may refuse to shoot when no aperture is selected in certain modes. Do you know if this affects the D3100?
– Hueco
4 hours ago
1
@Hueco not sure precisely. It never occurred to me to use a t-mounted camera in anything other than manual mode. I had no problems shooting manual with a D90 mounted on a telescope, nor with my D800E on a scope.
– scottbb
3 hours ago
This is not entirely true--you could use an additional aperture inline between the objective and the flange.
– chrylis
50 mins ago
1
@chrylis Well, I did use the weasel phrase "telescopes do not typically have variable apertures"... =) But regardless, the bigger point is that apertures are not a part of the camera.
– scottbb
46 mins ago
I'm not sure about OP's camera - but I know some may refuse to shoot when no aperture is selected in certain modes. Do you know if this affects the D3100?
– Hueco
4 hours ago
I'm not sure about OP's camera - but I know some may refuse to shoot when no aperture is selected in certain modes. Do you know if this affects the D3100?
– Hueco
4 hours ago
1
1
@Hueco not sure precisely. It never occurred to me to use a t-mounted camera in anything other than manual mode. I had no problems shooting manual with a D90 mounted on a telescope, nor with my D800E on a scope.
– scottbb
3 hours ago
@Hueco not sure precisely. It never occurred to me to use a t-mounted camera in anything other than manual mode. I had no problems shooting manual with a D90 mounted on a telescope, nor with my D800E on a scope.
– scottbb
3 hours ago
This is not entirely true--you could use an additional aperture inline between the objective and the flange.
– chrylis
50 mins ago
This is not entirely true--you could use an additional aperture inline between the objective and the flange.
– chrylis
50 mins ago
1
1
@chrylis Well, I did use the weasel phrase "telescopes do not typically have variable apertures"... =) But regardless, the bigger point is that apertures are not a part of the camera.
– scottbb
46 mins ago
@chrylis Well, I did use the weasel phrase "telescopes do not typically have variable apertures"... =) But regardless, the bigger point is that apertures are not a part of the camera.
– scottbb
46 mins ago
add a comment |
Check your telescope manual and find the telescope's aperture. Assuming no telescope eyepiece is utilized, the camera is said to be at the "prime focus" position. Find the scope's diameter. Find the scope's focal length. Divide focal length by diameter. The results of this math is the working f number of the system. Example: 1000mm focal length 4 inch diameter. Convert all units to millimeters. Inches to millimeters conversion is 25.4. Thus 1000 / (4 X 25.4) = 1000 / 101.6 = 9.8. Round to f/10. By the way, f/10 is typical of most systems.
add a comment |
Check your telescope manual and find the telescope's aperture. Assuming no telescope eyepiece is utilized, the camera is said to be at the "prime focus" position. Find the scope's diameter. Find the scope's focal length. Divide focal length by diameter. The results of this math is the working f number of the system. Example: 1000mm focal length 4 inch diameter. Convert all units to millimeters. Inches to millimeters conversion is 25.4. Thus 1000 / (4 X 25.4) = 1000 / 101.6 = 9.8. Round to f/10. By the way, f/10 is typical of most systems.
add a comment |
Check your telescope manual and find the telescope's aperture. Assuming no telescope eyepiece is utilized, the camera is said to be at the "prime focus" position. Find the scope's diameter. Find the scope's focal length. Divide focal length by diameter. The results of this math is the working f number of the system. Example: 1000mm focal length 4 inch diameter. Convert all units to millimeters. Inches to millimeters conversion is 25.4. Thus 1000 / (4 X 25.4) = 1000 / 101.6 = 9.8. Round to f/10. By the way, f/10 is typical of most systems.
Check your telescope manual and find the telescope's aperture. Assuming no telescope eyepiece is utilized, the camera is said to be at the "prime focus" position. Find the scope's diameter. Find the scope's focal length. Divide focal length by diameter. The results of this math is the working f number of the system. Example: 1000mm focal length 4 inch diameter. Convert all units to millimeters. Inches to millimeters conversion is 25.4. Thus 1000 / (4 X 25.4) = 1000 / 101.6 = 9.8. Round to f/10. By the way, f/10 is typical of most systems.
answered 5 hours ago
Alan MarcusAlan Marcus
26k23060
26k23060
add a comment |
add a comment |
Gergely Kovacs is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Gergely Kovacs is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Gergely Kovacs is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Gergely Kovacs is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Photography Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphoto.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f106699%2fhow-can-i-set-the-aperture-on-my-dslr-when-its-attached-to-a-telescope-instead%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown