My employer signed an NDA on my behalfNDA - Invention after termination of engagementNDA/non-compete...
Count Even Digits In Number
Alignment: "Breaking out" of environment (enumerate / minipage)
Did people Unsnap to where they were?
Employer asking for online access to bank account - Is this a scam?
Gladys goes shopping
How do I partition a matrx into blocks and replace zeros with dots?
Using credit/debit card details vs swiping a card in a payment (credit card) terminal
Python program to take in two strings and print the larger string
How to know if a folder is a symbolic link?
Installed Tankless Water Heater - Internet loss when active
Why is a `for` loop so much faster to count True values?
Apache redirect to https:/www only partially working
High resistance, no current. What's the point of a potential then?
Is it rude to call a professor by their last name with no prefix in a non-academic setting?
What are the mechanical differences between the uncommon Medallion of Thoughts and the rare Potion of Mind Reading?
Which melee weapons have the Two-Handed property, but lack Heavy and Special?
Why are C64 games inconsistent with which joystick port they use?
What to keep in mind when telling an aunt how wrong her actions are, without creating further family conflict?
Should breaking down something like a door be adjudicated as an attempt to beat its AC and HP, or as an ability check against a set DC?
Plot and know intersection points of multiple lines/functions
Externally monitoring CPU/SSD activity without software access
What does this symbol on the box of power supply mean?
Pirate democracy at its finest
Is the Indo-European language family made up?
My employer signed an NDA on my behalf
NDA - Invention after termination of engagementNDA/non-compete disclosure to new employerPre-interview NDACan you show an NDA to a new employer?Do I need to sign an NDA?My employer wants me to a sign an NDA that is backdated more than 2 yearsFranchise business failed due to franchisor fraud, NDA signed, how to list on resume / linked InDoes an NDA preventing me stopping doomed project?Can I use NDA materials to force my employer to pay my salary if I haven't signed NDA agreement?NDA agreement for interview task
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}
I work for the US government in a research facility. I basically cannot sign anything on my own and definitely am not allowed to sign an NDA without written authorization from my supervisor. Yesterday I attended a meeting at our facility with an industry representative. At the meeting I was told by both my supervisor and the industry rep that a 2-way NDA had been signed and that I could talk freely about my work, but that I was not allowed to talk outside the room about anything I heard from the industry representative.
Is this typical, or even legally binding? How can I be sure I don't violate an NDA that I have not seen nor signed?
management non-disclosure-agreement
add a comment |
I work for the US government in a research facility. I basically cannot sign anything on my own and definitely am not allowed to sign an NDA without written authorization from my supervisor. Yesterday I attended a meeting at our facility with an industry representative. At the meeting I was told by both my supervisor and the industry rep that a 2-way NDA had been signed and that I could talk freely about my work, but that I was not allowed to talk outside the room about anything I heard from the industry representative.
Is this typical, or even legally binding? How can I be sure I don't violate an NDA that I have not seen nor signed?
management non-disclosure-agreement
Who told you about the NDA? The industry rep, or your employer?
– HorusKol
1 hour ago
@HorusKol see edit. I was told by both.
– StrongBad
25 mins ago
add a comment |
I work for the US government in a research facility. I basically cannot sign anything on my own and definitely am not allowed to sign an NDA without written authorization from my supervisor. Yesterday I attended a meeting at our facility with an industry representative. At the meeting I was told by both my supervisor and the industry rep that a 2-way NDA had been signed and that I could talk freely about my work, but that I was not allowed to talk outside the room about anything I heard from the industry representative.
Is this typical, or even legally binding? How can I be sure I don't violate an NDA that I have not seen nor signed?
management non-disclosure-agreement
I work for the US government in a research facility. I basically cannot sign anything on my own and definitely am not allowed to sign an NDA without written authorization from my supervisor. Yesterday I attended a meeting at our facility with an industry representative. At the meeting I was told by both my supervisor and the industry rep that a 2-way NDA had been signed and that I could talk freely about my work, but that I was not allowed to talk outside the room about anything I heard from the industry representative.
Is this typical, or even legally binding? How can I be sure I don't violate an NDA that I have not seen nor signed?
management non-disclosure-agreement
management non-disclosure-agreement
edited 25 mins ago
StrongBad
asked 9 hours ago
StrongBadStrongBad
202127
202127
Who told you about the NDA? The industry rep, or your employer?
– HorusKol
1 hour ago
@HorusKol see edit. I was told by both.
– StrongBad
25 mins ago
add a comment |
Who told you about the NDA? The industry rep, or your employer?
– HorusKol
1 hour ago
@HorusKol see edit. I was told by both.
– StrongBad
25 mins ago
Who told you about the NDA? The industry rep, or your employer?
– HorusKol
1 hour ago
Who told you about the NDA? The industry rep, or your employer?
– HorusKol
1 hour ago
@HorusKol see edit. I was told by both.
– StrongBad
25 mins ago
@HorusKol see edit. I was told by both.
– StrongBad
25 mins ago
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
In the US, it is very common for corporations or other entities to sign NDAs - for instance, a manufacturer may sign one with a vendor or supplier they use. The NDA exists at a corporate level, and each entity it's signed on behalf of is responsible for enforcing any terms they've agreed to.
In other words, your employer is responsible for things your employer signs. If your employer has signed something that specifies who you are or are not allowed to disclose certain information to, then they are responsible for communicating that to you - and it sounds like they have. Effectively, your responsibility as far as the NDA is concerned is to behave as your employer is instructing you to, with respect to sharing information with or about the third party representative. Often, these corporate-level NDAs don't name specific employees; your employer may not have literally signed it on your behalf (meaning, you are named in the NDA) - more typically, they've signed it on behalf of all employees.
In effect, the employer signing the NDA with the industry representative (instead of asking every employee to) is an administrative necessity. A given employer may have hundreds or thousands or tens of thousands of employees, and hundreds or thousands or tens of thousands of NDAs with third parties. If they tried to maintain a policy of every employee signing every specific NDA, things would get out of control quickly. So, employers often require employees to sign some sort of blanket NDA, or other corporate policy, that basically says "don't give away our secrets or those of our third parties" and they are then responsible for providing guidance on specific third parties who you are interacting with, as they have done in this case.
1
There's also probably an NDA the OP has with his employer that covers complying with third party ndas in some way, otherewise there would be no binding once the op left.
– IllusiveBrian
8 hours ago
That's a good point, I'm going to edit your intent into my answer.
– dwizum
8 hours ago
A corporate NDA can also be easier for the vendor -- they don't have to trace leaks beyond the employer, and they don't have to worry about getting a single person to compensate them for a multimillion-dollar leak.
– cpast
2 hours ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "423"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworkplace.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f137217%2fmy-employer-signed-an-nda-on-my-behalf%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
In the US, it is very common for corporations or other entities to sign NDAs - for instance, a manufacturer may sign one with a vendor or supplier they use. The NDA exists at a corporate level, and each entity it's signed on behalf of is responsible for enforcing any terms they've agreed to.
In other words, your employer is responsible for things your employer signs. If your employer has signed something that specifies who you are or are not allowed to disclose certain information to, then they are responsible for communicating that to you - and it sounds like they have. Effectively, your responsibility as far as the NDA is concerned is to behave as your employer is instructing you to, with respect to sharing information with or about the third party representative. Often, these corporate-level NDAs don't name specific employees; your employer may not have literally signed it on your behalf (meaning, you are named in the NDA) - more typically, they've signed it on behalf of all employees.
In effect, the employer signing the NDA with the industry representative (instead of asking every employee to) is an administrative necessity. A given employer may have hundreds or thousands or tens of thousands of employees, and hundreds or thousands or tens of thousands of NDAs with third parties. If they tried to maintain a policy of every employee signing every specific NDA, things would get out of control quickly. So, employers often require employees to sign some sort of blanket NDA, or other corporate policy, that basically says "don't give away our secrets or those of our third parties" and they are then responsible for providing guidance on specific third parties who you are interacting with, as they have done in this case.
1
There's also probably an NDA the OP has with his employer that covers complying with third party ndas in some way, otherewise there would be no binding once the op left.
– IllusiveBrian
8 hours ago
That's a good point, I'm going to edit your intent into my answer.
– dwizum
8 hours ago
A corporate NDA can also be easier for the vendor -- they don't have to trace leaks beyond the employer, and they don't have to worry about getting a single person to compensate them for a multimillion-dollar leak.
– cpast
2 hours ago
add a comment |
In the US, it is very common for corporations or other entities to sign NDAs - for instance, a manufacturer may sign one with a vendor or supplier they use. The NDA exists at a corporate level, and each entity it's signed on behalf of is responsible for enforcing any terms they've agreed to.
In other words, your employer is responsible for things your employer signs. If your employer has signed something that specifies who you are or are not allowed to disclose certain information to, then they are responsible for communicating that to you - and it sounds like they have. Effectively, your responsibility as far as the NDA is concerned is to behave as your employer is instructing you to, with respect to sharing information with or about the third party representative. Often, these corporate-level NDAs don't name specific employees; your employer may not have literally signed it on your behalf (meaning, you are named in the NDA) - more typically, they've signed it on behalf of all employees.
In effect, the employer signing the NDA with the industry representative (instead of asking every employee to) is an administrative necessity. A given employer may have hundreds or thousands or tens of thousands of employees, and hundreds or thousands or tens of thousands of NDAs with third parties. If they tried to maintain a policy of every employee signing every specific NDA, things would get out of control quickly. So, employers often require employees to sign some sort of blanket NDA, or other corporate policy, that basically says "don't give away our secrets or those of our third parties" and they are then responsible for providing guidance on specific third parties who you are interacting with, as they have done in this case.
1
There's also probably an NDA the OP has with his employer that covers complying with third party ndas in some way, otherewise there would be no binding once the op left.
– IllusiveBrian
8 hours ago
That's a good point, I'm going to edit your intent into my answer.
– dwizum
8 hours ago
A corporate NDA can also be easier for the vendor -- they don't have to trace leaks beyond the employer, and they don't have to worry about getting a single person to compensate them for a multimillion-dollar leak.
– cpast
2 hours ago
add a comment |
In the US, it is very common for corporations or other entities to sign NDAs - for instance, a manufacturer may sign one with a vendor or supplier they use. The NDA exists at a corporate level, and each entity it's signed on behalf of is responsible for enforcing any terms they've agreed to.
In other words, your employer is responsible for things your employer signs. If your employer has signed something that specifies who you are or are not allowed to disclose certain information to, then they are responsible for communicating that to you - and it sounds like they have. Effectively, your responsibility as far as the NDA is concerned is to behave as your employer is instructing you to, with respect to sharing information with or about the third party representative. Often, these corporate-level NDAs don't name specific employees; your employer may not have literally signed it on your behalf (meaning, you are named in the NDA) - more typically, they've signed it on behalf of all employees.
In effect, the employer signing the NDA with the industry representative (instead of asking every employee to) is an administrative necessity. A given employer may have hundreds or thousands or tens of thousands of employees, and hundreds or thousands or tens of thousands of NDAs with third parties. If they tried to maintain a policy of every employee signing every specific NDA, things would get out of control quickly. So, employers often require employees to sign some sort of blanket NDA, or other corporate policy, that basically says "don't give away our secrets or those of our third parties" and they are then responsible for providing guidance on specific third parties who you are interacting with, as they have done in this case.
In the US, it is very common for corporations or other entities to sign NDAs - for instance, a manufacturer may sign one with a vendor or supplier they use. The NDA exists at a corporate level, and each entity it's signed on behalf of is responsible for enforcing any terms they've agreed to.
In other words, your employer is responsible for things your employer signs. If your employer has signed something that specifies who you are or are not allowed to disclose certain information to, then they are responsible for communicating that to you - and it sounds like they have. Effectively, your responsibility as far as the NDA is concerned is to behave as your employer is instructing you to, with respect to sharing information with or about the third party representative. Often, these corporate-level NDAs don't name specific employees; your employer may not have literally signed it on your behalf (meaning, you are named in the NDA) - more typically, they've signed it on behalf of all employees.
In effect, the employer signing the NDA with the industry representative (instead of asking every employee to) is an administrative necessity. A given employer may have hundreds or thousands or tens of thousands of employees, and hundreds or thousands or tens of thousands of NDAs with third parties. If they tried to maintain a policy of every employee signing every specific NDA, things would get out of control quickly. So, employers often require employees to sign some sort of blanket NDA, or other corporate policy, that basically says "don't give away our secrets or those of our third parties" and they are then responsible for providing guidance on specific third parties who you are interacting with, as they have done in this case.
edited 8 hours ago
answered 9 hours ago
dwizumdwizum
22.7k104475
22.7k104475
1
There's also probably an NDA the OP has with his employer that covers complying with third party ndas in some way, otherewise there would be no binding once the op left.
– IllusiveBrian
8 hours ago
That's a good point, I'm going to edit your intent into my answer.
– dwizum
8 hours ago
A corporate NDA can also be easier for the vendor -- they don't have to trace leaks beyond the employer, and they don't have to worry about getting a single person to compensate them for a multimillion-dollar leak.
– cpast
2 hours ago
add a comment |
1
There's also probably an NDA the OP has with his employer that covers complying with third party ndas in some way, otherewise there would be no binding once the op left.
– IllusiveBrian
8 hours ago
That's a good point, I'm going to edit your intent into my answer.
– dwizum
8 hours ago
A corporate NDA can also be easier for the vendor -- they don't have to trace leaks beyond the employer, and they don't have to worry about getting a single person to compensate them for a multimillion-dollar leak.
– cpast
2 hours ago
1
1
There's also probably an NDA the OP has with his employer that covers complying with third party ndas in some way, otherewise there would be no binding once the op left.
– IllusiveBrian
8 hours ago
There's also probably an NDA the OP has with his employer that covers complying with third party ndas in some way, otherewise there would be no binding once the op left.
– IllusiveBrian
8 hours ago
That's a good point, I'm going to edit your intent into my answer.
– dwizum
8 hours ago
That's a good point, I'm going to edit your intent into my answer.
– dwizum
8 hours ago
A corporate NDA can also be easier for the vendor -- they don't have to trace leaks beyond the employer, and they don't have to worry about getting a single person to compensate them for a multimillion-dollar leak.
– cpast
2 hours ago
A corporate NDA can also be easier for the vendor -- they don't have to trace leaks beyond the employer, and they don't have to worry about getting a single person to compensate them for a multimillion-dollar leak.
– cpast
2 hours ago
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to The Workplace Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworkplace.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f137217%2fmy-employer-signed-an-nda-on-my-behalf%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Who told you about the NDA? The industry rep, or your employer?
– HorusKol
1 hour ago
@HorusKol see edit. I was told by both.
– StrongBad
25 mins ago