Why can I not put the limit inside the limit definition of $e$?Proof that the solution to cosx = x, is the...
Can I have a delimited macro with a literal # in the parameter text?
Was murdering a slave illegal in American slavery, and if so, what punishments were given for it?
How do I unravel apparent recursion in an edef statement?
Why does string strummed with finger sound different from the one strummed with pick?
Addressing an email
Character had a different name in the past. Which name should I use in a flashback?
Why did Nick Fury not hesitate in blowing up the plane he thought was carrying a nuke?
Can't think of a good word or term to describe not feeling or thinking
Bookshelves: the intruder
How to convince boss to spend notice period on documentation instead of new projects
What's is the easiest way to purchase a stock and hold it
What city and town structures are important in a low fantasy medieval world?
Why would Thor need to strike a building with lightning to attack enemies?
Why are Marine Le Pen's possible connections with Steve Bannon something worth investigating?
Who is frowning in the sentence "Daisy looked at Tom frowning"?
How can I prevent Bash expansion from passing files starting with "-" as argument?
Why is python script running in background consuming 100 % CPU?
Why does snapping your fingers activate the Infinity Gauntlet?
Very serious stuff - Salesforce bug enabled "Modify All"
Warped chessboard
Failing students when it might cause them economic ruin
Latin words remembered from high school 50 years ago
If you attack a Tarrasque while swallowed, what AC do you need to beat to hit it?
What does this 'x' mean on the stem of the voice's note, above the notehead?
Why can I not put the limit inside the limit definition of $e$?
Proof that the solution to cosx = x, is the limit of a recursive sequence.Move derivative inside limit.Showing a limit does not exist using Cauchy's $epsilon, delta $ limit definitionUniformly continuous function which is integrable but does not have a limitWhy is the limit not $ln(x)$?Limit definition of integrationComputing limit using definition of eThe Limit Comparison Test V1What do I miss on this function? $f(t) = (t-1)^{s/2}-t^{s/2}+1$Determining if the limit exists of the sequence
$begingroup$
We know $e:= lim_{nto infty}(1+frac{1}{n})^n$
We also know $x^n$ is continuous. Why is there a contradiction in the following?
$e=lim_{nto infty}(1+frac{1}{n})^n=(lim_{nto infty}(1+frac{1}{n}))^n=1$
Is it because $x^n$ isn't really a continuous function, because the $n$ is not fixed but rather something like infinity?
real-analysis calculus
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
We know $e:= lim_{nto infty}(1+frac{1}{n})^n$
We also know $x^n$ is continuous. Why is there a contradiction in the following?
$e=lim_{nto infty}(1+frac{1}{n})^n=(lim_{nto infty}(1+frac{1}{n}))^n=1$
Is it because $x^n$ isn't really a continuous function, because the $n$ is not fixed but rather something like infinity?
real-analysis calculus
New contributor
$endgroup$
3
$begingroup$
Because $n$ isn't a fixed number, so it's presence outside of the limit is meaningless
$endgroup$
– MPW
6 hours ago
2
$begingroup$
We say $1^infty$ is an indeterminete form. Look that up in your calculus textbook.
$endgroup$
– GEdgar
6 hours ago
2
$begingroup$
Note that once you put "the limit inside the limit definition" as shown, the exponent $n$ is no longer in the scope of taking a limit as $ntoinfty$. As such, the meaning of $n$ the exponent is no longer tied to the $n$ that is in the innermost parentheses. Both need to be taken to the limit together to have the original meaning.
$endgroup$
– hardmath
4 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
We know $e:= lim_{nto infty}(1+frac{1}{n})^n$
We also know $x^n$ is continuous. Why is there a contradiction in the following?
$e=lim_{nto infty}(1+frac{1}{n})^n=(lim_{nto infty}(1+frac{1}{n}))^n=1$
Is it because $x^n$ isn't really a continuous function, because the $n$ is not fixed but rather something like infinity?
real-analysis calculus
New contributor
$endgroup$
We know $e:= lim_{nto infty}(1+frac{1}{n})^n$
We also know $x^n$ is continuous. Why is there a contradiction in the following?
$e=lim_{nto infty}(1+frac{1}{n})^n=(lim_{nto infty}(1+frac{1}{n}))^n=1$
Is it because $x^n$ isn't really a continuous function, because the $n$ is not fixed but rather something like infinity?
real-analysis calculus
real-analysis calculus
New contributor
New contributor
edited 19 mins ago
YuiTo Cheng
3,25371245
3,25371245
New contributor
asked 6 hours ago
abcdabcd
41
41
New contributor
New contributor
3
$begingroup$
Because $n$ isn't a fixed number, so it's presence outside of the limit is meaningless
$endgroup$
– MPW
6 hours ago
2
$begingroup$
We say $1^infty$ is an indeterminete form. Look that up in your calculus textbook.
$endgroup$
– GEdgar
6 hours ago
2
$begingroup$
Note that once you put "the limit inside the limit definition" as shown, the exponent $n$ is no longer in the scope of taking a limit as $ntoinfty$. As such, the meaning of $n$ the exponent is no longer tied to the $n$ that is in the innermost parentheses. Both need to be taken to the limit together to have the original meaning.
$endgroup$
– hardmath
4 hours ago
add a comment |
3
$begingroup$
Because $n$ isn't a fixed number, so it's presence outside of the limit is meaningless
$endgroup$
– MPW
6 hours ago
2
$begingroup$
We say $1^infty$ is an indeterminete form. Look that up in your calculus textbook.
$endgroup$
– GEdgar
6 hours ago
2
$begingroup$
Note that once you put "the limit inside the limit definition" as shown, the exponent $n$ is no longer in the scope of taking a limit as $ntoinfty$. As such, the meaning of $n$ the exponent is no longer tied to the $n$ that is in the innermost parentheses. Both need to be taken to the limit together to have the original meaning.
$endgroup$
– hardmath
4 hours ago
3
3
$begingroup$
Because $n$ isn't a fixed number, so it's presence outside of the limit is meaningless
$endgroup$
– MPW
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
Because $n$ isn't a fixed number, so it's presence outside of the limit is meaningless
$endgroup$
– MPW
6 hours ago
2
2
$begingroup$
We say $1^infty$ is an indeterminete form. Look that up in your calculus textbook.
$endgroup$
– GEdgar
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
We say $1^infty$ is an indeterminete form. Look that up in your calculus textbook.
$endgroup$
– GEdgar
6 hours ago
2
2
$begingroup$
Note that once you put "the limit inside the limit definition" as shown, the exponent $n$ is no longer in the scope of taking a limit as $ntoinfty$. As such, the meaning of $n$ the exponent is no longer tied to the $n$ that is in the innermost parentheses. Both need to be taken to the limit together to have the original meaning.
$endgroup$
– hardmath
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
Note that once you put "the limit inside the limit definition" as shown, the exponent $n$ is no longer in the scope of taking a limit as $ntoinfty$. As such, the meaning of $n$ the exponent is no longer tied to the $n$ that is in the innermost parentheses. Both need to be taken to the limit together to have the original meaning.
$endgroup$
– hardmath
4 hours ago
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
You can't move a limit that depends on $n$ "inside" the function if the outside function depends on $n$. For example, it is clearly true that
$$lim_{n to infty} 2^n= infty .$$
However, if you move the limit "inside," you get
$$lim_{n to infty} 2^n= (lim_{n to infty} 2)^n=2^n$$
which does not make much sense, since you do not know what $n$ is... $n$ was supposed to go to infinity. However, since you "got rid of" the limit, $n$ has no meaning anymore.
In other words, whenever you are calculating limits, $n$ should disappear at the same step as the words $lim_{n to infty}$. If these two things don't go away at the same time, most likely it is a sign that you did something wrong.
I hope that helps!
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Well explained. The limit operation and the variable bound to it go together.
$endgroup$
– Paramanand Singh
2 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The actual problem is you can't write $(lim_{ntoinfty}f(n))^n$, or anything else that uses $n$ outside the limit, because it's a dummy variable that exists only inside the limit. The role of $infty$ is irrelevant; you also can't, for the same reason, jump from $lim_{xto 2}(x+x)=4$ to writing $(lim_{xto 2}x)+x$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Because the exponent is variable depending. In this case you get $1^{infty}$ which is indeterminate, or means merely that this limit can be anything.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
abcd is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3229984%2fwhy-can-i-not-put-the-limit-inside-the-limit-definition-of-e%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
You can't move a limit that depends on $n$ "inside" the function if the outside function depends on $n$. For example, it is clearly true that
$$lim_{n to infty} 2^n= infty .$$
However, if you move the limit "inside," you get
$$lim_{n to infty} 2^n= (lim_{n to infty} 2)^n=2^n$$
which does not make much sense, since you do not know what $n$ is... $n$ was supposed to go to infinity. However, since you "got rid of" the limit, $n$ has no meaning anymore.
In other words, whenever you are calculating limits, $n$ should disappear at the same step as the words $lim_{n to infty}$. If these two things don't go away at the same time, most likely it is a sign that you did something wrong.
I hope that helps!
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Well explained. The limit operation and the variable bound to it go together.
$endgroup$
– Paramanand Singh
2 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You can't move a limit that depends on $n$ "inside" the function if the outside function depends on $n$. For example, it is clearly true that
$$lim_{n to infty} 2^n= infty .$$
However, if you move the limit "inside," you get
$$lim_{n to infty} 2^n= (lim_{n to infty} 2)^n=2^n$$
which does not make much sense, since you do not know what $n$ is... $n$ was supposed to go to infinity. However, since you "got rid of" the limit, $n$ has no meaning anymore.
In other words, whenever you are calculating limits, $n$ should disappear at the same step as the words $lim_{n to infty}$. If these two things don't go away at the same time, most likely it is a sign that you did something wrong.
I hope that helps!
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Well explained. The limit operation and the variable bound to it go together.
$endgroup$
– Paramanand Singh
2 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You can't move a limit that depends on $n$ "inside" the function if the outside function depends on $n$. For example, it is clearly true that
$$lim_{n to infty} 2^n= infty .$$
However, if you move the limit "inside," you get
$$lim_{n to infty} 2^n= (lim_{n to infty} 2)^n=2^n$$
which does not make much sense, since you do not know what $n$ is... $n$ was supposed to go to infinity. However, since you "got rid of" the limit, $n$ has no meaning anymore.
In other words, whenever you are calculating limits, $n$ should disappear at the same step as the words $lim_{n to infty}$. If these two things don't go away at the same time, most likely it is a sign that you did something wrong.
I hope that helps!
$endgroup$
You can't move a limit that depends on $n$ "inside" the function if the outside function depends on $n$. For example, it is clearly true that
$$lim_{n to infty} 2^n= infty .$$
However, if you move the limit "inside," you get
$$lim_{n to infty} 2^n= (lim_{n to infty} 2)^n=2^n$$
which does not make much sense, since you do not know what $n$ is... $n$ was supposed to go to infinity. However, since you "got rid of" the limit, $n$ has no meaning anymore.
In other words, whenever you are calculating limits, $n$ should disappear at the same step as the words $lim_{n to infty}$. If these two things don't go away at the same time, most likely it is a sign that you did something wrong.
I hope that helps!
answered 6 hours ago
PawelPawel
3,3341022
3,3341022
$begingroup$
Well explained. The limit operation and the variable bound to it go together.
$endgroup$
– Paramanand Singh
2 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Well explained. The limit operation and the variable bound to it go together.
$endgroup$
– Paramanand Singh
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
Well explained. The limit operation and the variable bound to it go together.
$endgroup$
– Paramanand Singh
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
Well explained. The limit operation and the variable bound to it go together.
$endgroup$
– Paramanand Singh
2 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The actual problem is you can't write $(lim_{ntoinfty}f(n))^n$, or anything else that uses $n$ outside the limit, because it's a dummy variable that exists only inside the limit. The role of $infty$ is irrelevant; you also can't, for the same reason, jump from $lim_{xto 2}(x+x)=4$ to writing $(lim_{xto 2}x)+x$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The actual problem is you can't write $(lim_{ntoinfty}f(n))^n$, or anything else that uses $n$ outside the limit, because it's a dummy variable that exists only inside the limit. The role of $infty$ is irrelevant; you also can't, for the same reason, jump from $lim_{xto 2}(x+x)=4$ to writing $(lim_{xto 2}x)+x$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The actual problem is you can't write $(lim_{ntoinfty}f(n))^n$, or anything else that uses $n$ outside the limit, because it's a dummy variable that exists only inside the limit. The role of $infty$ is irrelevant; you also can't, for the same reason, jump from $lim_{xto 2}(x+x)=4$ to writing $(lim_{xto 2}x)+x$.
$endgroup$
The actual problem is you can't write $(lim_{ntoinfty}f(n))^n$, or anything else that uses $n$ outside the limit, because it's a dummy variable that exists only inside the limit. The role of $infty$ is irrelevant; you also can't, for the same reason, jump from $lim_{xto 2}(x+x)=4$ to writing $(lim_{xto 2}x)+x$.
answered 6 hours ago
J.G.J.G.
37.7k23656
37.7k23656
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Because the exponent is variable depending. In this case you get $1^{infty}$ which is indeterminate, or means merely that this limit can be anything.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Because the exponent is variable depending. In this case you get $1^{infty}$ which is indeterminate, or means merely that this limit can be anything.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Because the exponent is variable depending. In this case you get $1^{infty}$ which is indeterminate, or means merely that this limit can be anything.
$endgroup$
Because the exponent is variable depending. In this case you get $1^{infty}$ which is indeterminate, or means merely that this limit can be anything.
answered 6 hours ago
HAMIDINE SOUMAREHAMIDINE SOUMARE
4,2761625
4,2761625
add a comment |
add a comment |
abcd is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
abcd is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
abcd is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
abcd is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3229984%2fwhy-can-i-not-put-the-limit-inside-the-limit-definition-of-e%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
3
$begingroup$
Because $n$ isn't a fixed number, so it's presence outside of the limit is meaningless
$endgroup$
– MPW
6 hours ago
2
$begingroup$
We say $1^infty$ is an indeterminete form. Look that up in your calculus textbook.
$endgroup$
– GEdgar
6 hours ago
2
$begingroup$
Note that once you put "the limit inside the limit definition" as shown, the exponent $n$ is no longer in the scope of taking a limit as $ntoinfty$. As such, the meaning of $n$ the exponent is no longer tied to the $n$ that is in the innermost parentheses. Both need to be taken to the limit together to have the original meaning.
$endgroup$
– hardmath
4 hours ago