Why can I not put the limit inside the limit definition of $e$?Proof that the solution to cosx = x, is the...

Can I have a delimited macro with a literal # in the parameter text?

Was murdering a slave illegal in American slavery, and if so, what punishments were given for it?

How do I unravel apparent recursion in an edef statement?

Why does string strummed with finger sound different from the one strummed with pick?

Addressing an email

Character had a different name in the past. Which name should I use in a flashback?

Why did Nick Fury not hesitate in blowing up the plane he thought was carrying a nuke?

Can't think of a good word or term to describe not feeling or thinking

Bookshelves: the intruder

How to convince boss to spend notice period on documentation instead of new projects

What's is the easiest way to purchase a stock and hold it

What city and town structures are important in a low fantasy medieval world?

Why would Thor need to strike a building with lightning to attack enemies?

Why are Marine Le Pen's possible connections with Steve Bannon something worth investigating?

Who is frowning in the sentence "Daisy looked at Tom frowning"?

How can I prevent Bash expansion from passing files starting with "-" as argument?

Why is python script running in background consuming 100 % CPU?

Why does snapping your fingers activate the Infinity Gauntlet?

Very serious stuff - Salesforce bug enabled "Modify All"

Warped chessboard

Failing students when it might cause them economic ruin

Latin words remembered from high school 50 years ago

If you attack a Tarrasque while swallowed, what AC do you need to beat to hit it?

What does this 'x' mean on the stem of the voice's note, above the notehead?



Why can I not put the limit inside the limit definition of $e$?


Proof that the solution to cosx = x, is the limit of a recursive sequence.Move derivative inside limit.Showing a limit does not exist using Cauchy's $epsilon, delta $ limit definitionUniformly continuous function which is integrable but does not have a limitWhy is the limit not $ln(x)$?Limit definition of integrationComputing limit using definition of eThe Limit Comparison Test V1What do I miss on this function? $f(t) = (t-1)^{s/2}-t^{s/2}+1$Determining if the limit exists of the sequence













0












$begingroup$


We know $e:= lim_{nto infty}(1+frac{1}{n})^n$



We also know $x^n$ is continuous. Why is there a contradiction in the following?



$e=lim_{nto infty}(1+frac{1}{n})^n=(lim_{nto infty}(1+frac{1}{n}))^n=1$



Is it because $x^n$ isn't really a continuous function, because the $n$ is not fixed but rather something like infinity?










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor



abcd is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






$endgroup$








  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Because $n$ isn't a fixed number, so it's presence outside of the limit is meaningless
    $endgroup$
    – MPW
    6 hours ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    We say $1^infty$ is an indeterminete form. Look that up in your calculus textbook.
    $endgroup$
    – GEdgar
    6 hours ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Note that once you put "the limit inside the limit definition" as shown, the exponent $n$ is no longer in the scope of taking a limit as $ntoinfty$. As such, the meaning of $n$ the exponent is no longer tied to the $n$ that is in the innermost parentheses. Both need to be taken to the limit together to have the original meaning.
    $endgroup$
    – hardmath
    4 hours ago
















0












$begingroup$


We know $e:= lim_{nto infty}(1+frac{1}{n})^n$



We also know $x^n$ is continuous. Why is there a contradiction in the following?



$e=lim_{nto infty}(1+frac{1}{n})^n=(lim_{nto infty}(1+frac{1}{n}))^n=1$



Is it because $x^n$ isn't really a continuous function, because the $n$ is not fixed but rather something like infinity?










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor



abcd is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






$endgroup$








  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Because $n$ isn't a fixed number, so it's presence outside of the limit is meaningless
    $endgroup$
    – MPW
    6 hours ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    We say $1^infty$ is an indeterminete form. Look that up in your calculus textbook.
    $endgroup$
    – GEdgar
    6 hours ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Note that once you put "the limit inside the limit definition" as shown, the exponent $n$ is no longer in the scope of taking a limit as $ntoinfty$. As such, the meaning of $n$ the exponent is no longer tied to the $n$ that is in the innermost parentheses. Both need to be taken to the limit together to have the original meaning.
    $endgroup$
    – hardmath
    4 hours ago














0












0








0





$begingroup$


We know $e:= lim_{nto infty}(1+frac{1}{n})^n$



We also know $x^n$ is continuous. Why is there a contradiction in the following?



$e=lim_{nto infty}(1+frac{1}{n})^n=(lim_{nto infty}(1+frac{1}{n}))^n=1$



Is it because $x^n$ isn't really a continuous function, because the $n$ is not fixed but rather something like infinity?










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor



abcd is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






$endgroup$




We know $e:= lim_{nto infty}(1+frac{1}{n})^n$



We also know $x^n$ is continuous. Why is there a contradiction in the following?



$e=lim_{nto infty}(1+frac{1}{n})^n=(lim_{nto infty}(1+frac{1}{n}))^n=1$



Is it because $x^n$ isn't really a continuous function, because the $n$ is not fixed but rather something like infinity?







real-analysis calculus






share|cite|improve this question









New contributor



abcd is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor



abcd is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited 19 mins ago









YuiTo Cheng

3,25371245




3,25371245






New contributor



abcd is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








asked 6 hours ago









abcdabcd

41




41




New contributor



abcd is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




New contributor




abcd is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.










  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Because $n$ isn't a fixed number, so it's presence outside of the limit is meaningless
    $endgroup$
    – MPW
    6 hours ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    We say $1^infty$ is an indeterminete form. Look that up in your calculus textbook.
    $endgroup$
    – GEdgar
    6 hours ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Note that once you put "the limit inside the limit definition" as shown, the exponent $n$ is no longer in the scope of taking a limit as $ntoinfty$. As such, the meaning of $n$ the exponent is no longer tied to the $n$ that is in the innermost parentheses. Both need to be taken to the limit together to have the original meaning.
    $endgroup$
    – hardmath
    4 hours ago














  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Because $n$ isn't a fixed number, so it's presence outside of the limit is meaningless
    $endgroup$
    – MPW
    6 hours ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    We say $1^infty$ is an indeterminete form. Look that up in your calculus textbook.
    $endgroup$
    – GEdgar
    6 hours ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Note that once you put "the limit inside the limit definition" as shown, the exponent $n$ is no longer in the scope of taking a limit as $ntoinfty$. As such, the meaning of $n$ the exponent is no longer tied to the $n$ that is in the innermost parentheses. Both need to be taken to the limit together to have the original meaning.
    $endgroup$
    – hardmath
    4 hours ago








3




3




$begingroup$
Because $n$ isn't a fixed number, so it's presence outside of the limit is meaningless
$endgroup$
– MPW
6 hours ago




$begingroup$
Because $n$ isn't a fixed number, so it's presence outside of the limit is meaningless
$endgroup$
– MPW
6 hours ago




2




2




$begingroup$
We say $1^infty$ is an indeterminete form. Look that up in your calculus textbook.
$endgroup$
– GEdgar
6 hours ago




$begingroup$
We say $1^infty$ is an indeterminete form. Look that up in your calculus textbook.
$endgroup$
– GEdgar
6 hours ago




2




2




$begingroup$
Note that once you put "the limit inside the limit definition" as shown, the exponent $n$ is no longer in the scope of taking a limit as $ntoinfty$. As such, the meaning of $n$ the exponent is no longer tied to the $n$ that is in the innermost parentheses. Both need to be taken to the limit together to have the original meaning.
$endgroup$
– hardmath
4 hours ago




$begingroup$
Note that once you put "the limit inside the limit definition" as shown, the exponent $n$ is no longer in the scope of taking a limit as $ntoinfty$. As such, the meaning of $n$ the exponent is no longer tied to the $n$ that is in the innermost parentheses. Both need to be taken to the limit together to have the original meaning.
$endgroup$
– hardmath
4 hours ago










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















5












$begingroup$

You can't move a limit that depends on $n$ "inside" the function if the outside function depends on $n$. For example, it is clearly true that



$$lim_{n to infty} 2^n= infty .$$



However, if you move the limit "inside," you get



$$lim_{n to infty} 2^n= (lim_{n to infty} 2)^n=2^n$$



which does not make much sense, since you do not know what $n$ is... $n$ was supposed to go to infinity. However, since you "got rid of" the limit, $n$ has no meaning anymore.



In other words, whenever you are calculating limits, $n$ should disappear at the same step as the words $lim_{n to infty}$. If these two things don't go away at the same time, most likely it is a sign that you did something wrong.



I hope that helps!






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Well explained. The limit operation and the variable bound to it go together.
    $endgroup$
    – Paramanand Singh
    2 hours ago



















2












$begingroup$

The actual problem is you can't write $(lim_{ntoinfty}f(n))^n$, or anything else that uses $n$ outside the limit, because it's a dummy variable that exists only inside the limit. The role of $infty$ is irrelevant; you also can't, for the same reason, jump from $lim_{xto 2}(x+x)=4$ to writing $(lim_{xto 2}x)+x$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$





















    1












    $begingroup$

    Because the exponent is variable depending. In this case you get $1^{infty}$ which is indeterminate, or means merely that this limit can be anything.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$














      Your Answer








      StackExchange.ready(function() {
      var channelOptions = {
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "69"
      };
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
      createEditor();
      });
      }
      else {
      createEditor();
      }
      });

      function createEditor() {
      StackExchange.prepareEditor({
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: true,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: 10,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader: {
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      },
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      });


      }
      });






      abcd is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function () {
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3229984%2fwhy-can-i-not-put-the-limit-inside-the-limit-definition-of-e%23new-answer', 'question_page');
      }
      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes








      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      5












      $begingroup$

      You can't move a limit that depends on $n$ "inside" the function if the outside function depends on $n$. For example, it is clearly true that



      $$lim_{n to infty} 2^n= infty .$$



      However, if you move the limit "inside," you get



      $$lim_{n to infty} 2^n= (lim_{n to infty} 2)^n=2^n$$



      which does not make much sense, since you do not know what $n$ is... $n$ was supposed to go to infinity. However, since you "got rid of" the limit, $n$ has no meaning anymore.



      In other words, whenever you are calculating limits, $n$ should disappear at the same step as the words $lim_{n to infty}$. If these two things don't go away at the same time, most likely it is a sign that you did something wrong.



      I hope that helps!






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$













      • $begingroup$
        Well explained. The limit operation and the variable bound to it go together.
        $endgroup$
        – Paramanand Singh
        2 hours ago
















      5












      $begingroup$

      You can't move a limit that depends on $n$ "inside" the function if the outside function depends on $n$. For example, it is clearly true that



      $$lim_{n to infty} 2^n= infty .$$



      However, if you move the limit "inside," you get



      $$lim_{n to infty} 2^n= (lim_{n to infty} 2)^n=2^n$$



      which does not make much sense, since you do not know what $n$ is... $n$ was supposed to go to infinity. However, since you "got rid of" the limit, $n$ has no meaning anymore.



      In other words, whenever you are calculating limits, $n$ should disappear at the same step as the words $lim_{n to infty}$. If these two things don't go away at the same time, most likely it is a sign that you did something wrong.



      I hope that helps!






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$













      • $begingroup$
        Well explained. The limit operation and the variable bound to it go together.
        $endgroup$
        – Paramanand Singh
        2 hours ago














      5












      5








      5





      $begingroup$

      You can't move a limit that depends on $n$ "inside" the function if the outside function depends on $n$. For example, it is clearly true that



      $$lim_{n to infty} 2^n= infty .$$



      However, if you move the limit "inside," you get



      $$lim_{n to infty} 2^n= (lim_{n to infty} 2)^n=2^n$$



      which does not make much sense, since you do not know what $n$ is... $n$ was supposed to go to infinity. However, since you "got rid of" the limit, $n$ has no meaning anymore.



      In other words, whenever you are calculating limits, $n$ should disappear at the same step as the words $lim_{n to infty}$. If these two things don't go away at the same time, most likely it is a sign that you did something wrong.



      I hope that helps!






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$



      You can't move a limit that depends on $n$ "inside" the function if the outside function depends on $n$. For example, it is clearly true that



      $$lim_{n to infty} 2^n= infty .$$



      However, if you move the limit "inside," you get



      $$lim_{n to infty} 2^n= (lim_{n to infty} 2)^n=2^n$$



      which does not make much sense, since you do not know what $n$ is... $n$ was supposed to go to infinity. However, since you "got rid of" the limit, $n$ has no meaning anymore.



      In other words, whenever you are calculating limits, $n$ should disappear at the same step as the words $lim_{n to infty}$. If these two things don't go away at the same time, most likely it is a sign that you did something wrong.



      I hope that helps!







      share|cite|improve this answer












      share|cite|improve this answer



      share|cite|improve this answer










      answered 6 hours ago









      PawelPawel

      3,3341022




      3,3341022












      • $begingroup$
        Well explained. The limit operation and the variable bound to it go together.
        $endgroup$
        – Paramanand Singh
        2 hours ago


















      • $begingroup$
        Well explained. The limit operation and the variable bound to it go together.
        $endgroup$
        – Paramanand Singh
        2 hours ago
















      $begingroup$
      Well explained. The limit operation and the variable bound to it go together.
      $endgroup$
      – Paramanand Singh
      2 hours ago




      $begingroup$
      Well explained. The limit operation and the variable bound to it go together.
      $endgroup$
      – Paramanand Singh
      2 hours ago











      2












      $begingroup$

      The actual problem is you can't write $(lim_{ntoinfty}f(n))^n$, or anything else that uses $n$ outside the limit, because it's a dummy variable that exists only inside the limit. The role of $infty$ is irrelevant; you also can't, for the same reason, jump from $lim_{xto 2}(x+x)=4$ to writing $(lim_{xto 2}x)+x$.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$


















        2












        $begingroup$

        The actual problem is you can't write $(lim_{ntoinfty}f(n))^n$, or anything else that uses $n$ outside the limit, because it's a dummy variable that exists only inside the limit. The role of $infty$ is irrelevant; you also can't, for the same reason, jump from $lim_{xto 2}(x+x)=4$ to writing $(lim_{xto 2}x)+x$.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$
















          2












          2








          2





          $begingroup$

          The actual problem is you can't write $(lim_{ntoinfty}f(n))^n$, or anything else that uses $n$ outside the limit, because it's a dummy variable that exists only inside the limit. The role of $infty$ is irrelevant; you also can't, for the same reason, jump from $lim_{xto 2}(x+x)=4$ to writing $(lim_{xto 2}x)+x$.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          The actual problem is you can't write $(lim_{ntoinfty}f(n))^n$, or anything else that uses $n$ outside the limit, because it's a dummy variable that exists only inside the limit. The role of $infty$ is irrelevant; you also can't, for the same reason, jump from $lim_{xto 2}(x+x)=4$ to writing $(lim_{xto 2}x)+x$.







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered 6 hours ago









          J.G.J.G.

          37.7k23656




          37.7k23656























              1












              $begingroup$

              Because the exponent is variable depending. In this case you get $1^{infty}$ which is indeterminate, or means merely that this limit can be anything.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$


















                1












                $begingroup$

                Because the exponent is variable depending. In this case you get $1^{infty}$ which is indeterminate, or means merely that this limit can be anything.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$
















                  1












                  1








                  1





                  $begingroup$

                  Because the exponent is variable depending. In this case you get $1^{infty}$ which is indeterminate, or means merely that this limit can be anything.






                  share|cite|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$



                  Because the exponent is variable depending. In this case you get $1^{infty}$ which is indeterminate, or means merely that this limit can be anything.







                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  answered 6 hours ago









                  HAMIDINE SOUMAREHAMIDINE SOUMARE

                  4,2761625




                  4,2761625






















                      abcd is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










                      draft saved

                      draft discarded


















                      abcd is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













                      abcd is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












                      abcd is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
















                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function () {
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3229984%2fwhy-can-i-not-put-the-limit-inside-the-limit-definition-of-e%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                      }
                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Taj Mahal Inhaltsverzeichnis Aufbau | Geschichte | 350-Jahr-Feier | Heutige Bedeutung | Siehe auch |...

                      Baia Sprie Cuprins Etimologie | Istorie | Demografie | Politică și administrație | Arii naturale...

                      Nicolae Petrescu-Găină Cuprins Biografie | Opera | In memoriam | Varia | Controverse, incertitudini...