How was Peter Parker able to use EDITH in the end?How exactly was Aunt May related to Peter Parker?How was...

Create Array from list of indices/values

Can I use #10 wire for a 30A, 240V pump circuit?

Is the Münchhausen trilemma really a trilemma?

Generating a PIN from cryptographic bytes

Should I be able to keep my company purchased standing desk when I leave my job?

What is the difference between a Hosaka, Ono-Sendai, and a "deck"?

Can you perfectly wrap a cube with this blocky shape?

Which GPUs to get for Mathematical Optimization (if any)?

Is it ethical for a company to ask its employees to move furniture on a weekend?

What would be the safest way to drop thousands of small, hard objects from a typical, high wing, GA airplane?

Is this artwork (used in a video game) real?

What happens if there is no space for entry stamp in the passport for US visa?

Is there a typesafe way to get a Database.QueryLocator?

Why do space operations use "nominal" to mean "working correctly"?

What does it actually mean to have two time dimensions?

Was Apollo 13 radio blackout on reentry longer than expected?

What are "full piece" and "half piece" in chess?

Is it rude to refer to janitors as 'floor people'?

What are the basics of commands in Minecraft Java Edition?

Credit card details stolen every 1-2 years. What am I doing wrong?

Is it legal for a supermarket to refuse to sell an adult beer if an adult with them doesn’t have their ID?

How can the electric potential be zero at a point where the electric field isn't, if that field can give a test charge kinetic energy?

how slow a car engine can run

Kepler space telescope undetected planets



How was Peter Parker able to use EDITH in the end?


How exactly was Aunt May related to Peter Parker?How was Iron Man able to return at the end of the Avengers movie?After Peter Parker was bitten, what happened to the rest of the radioactive spiders?What happened to the spider that bit Peter Parker?Possible literary character influences for Peter ParkerHow does Peter Parker get to school?Why couldn't Peter use his suit at the endHow old does Peter Parker get?Did Peter Parker always attend Midtown High School?Why was Peter's “Peter Tingle” not working at the start of the events of “Far From Home”?






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}







4















Now, I could easily be missing a detail here, but my understanding is that the following steps occurred (obvious spoilers):




  1. Peter gets EDITH and "registers" himself using the glasses.

  2. Peter 'befriends' Beck and determines he's better suited to use EDITH. Peter transfers full control of EDITH to Beck.

  3. Betrayal and shenanigans from Beck/Mysterio ensues, ending with Beck's death.

  4. Peter takes back control of EDITH somehow (and without any indication of a transfer of control?) and orders them to abort.


How was #4 possible given the fact that Peter gave up control? I wouldn't have assumed they could both have control, since Peter never attempts to give EDITH commands during the time Beck is using it, unless Peter (in)conveniently forgot/didn't know up until the very end. The best guess I have is that control fell back to Peter after Beck's death somehow, but I have no proof.



I've seen a couple of posts on other sites, but they all seem like conjecture and speculation. Nothing official.










share|improve this question


















  • 1





    movies.stackexchange.com/questions/101957/…

    – Raj
    8 hours ago






  • 1





    @Raj - I must be blind because that's pretty much what I was looking for. Assuming their vague wording is why it didn't crop up in my Google searches... It's still more speculative-y than I'd prefer, but perhaps the best we have right now.

    – Broots Waymb
    8 hours ago













  • The reason Peter couldn't issue orders to EDITH until he had taken the glasses back is presumably simply that he needed to be wearing the glasses. Do we see anyone give EDITH orders without them?

    – Harry Johnston
    7 hours ago


















4















Now, I could easily be missing a detail here, but my understanding is that the following steps occurred (obvious spoilers):




  1. Peter gets EDITH and "registers" himself using the glasses.

  2. Peter 'befriends' Beck and determines he's better suited to use EDITH. Peter transfers full control of EDITH to Beck.

  3. Betrayal and shenanigans from Beck/Mysterio ensues, ending with Beck's death.

  4. Peter takes back control of EDITH somehow (and without any indication of a transfer of control?) and orders them to abort.


How was #4 possible given the fact that Peter gave up control? I wouldn't have assumed they could both have control, since Peter never attempts to give EDITH commands during the time Beck is using it, unless Peter (in)conveniently forgot/didn't know up until the very end. The best guess I have is that control fell back to Peter after Beck's death somehow, but I have no proof.



I've seen a couple of posts on other sites, but they all seem like conjecture and speculation. Nothing official.










share|improve this question


















  • 1





    movies.stackexchange.com/questions/101957/…

    – Raj
    8 hours ago






  • 1





    @Raj - I must be blind because that's pretty much what I was looking for. Assuming their vague wording is why it didn't crop up in my Google searches... It's still more speculative-y than I'd prefer, but perhaps the best we have right now.

    – Broots Waymb
    8 hours ago













  • The reason Peter couldn't issue orders to EDITH until he had taken the glasses back is presumably simply that he needed to be wearing the glasses. Do we see anyone give EDITH orders without them?

    – Harry Johnston
    7 hours ago














4












4








4








Now, I could easily be missing a detail here, but my understanding is that the following steps occurred (obvious spoilers):




  1. Peter gets EDITH and "registers" himself using the glasses.

  2. Peter 'befriends' Beck and determines he's better suited to use EDITH. Peter transfers full control of EDITH to Beck.

  3. Betrayal and shenanigans from Beck/Mysterio ensues, ending with Beck's death.

  4. Peter takes back control of EDITH somehow (and without any indication of a transfer of control?) and orders them to abort.


How was #4 possible given the fact that Peter gave up control? I wouldn't have assumed they could both have control, since Peter never attempts to give EDITH commands during the time Beck is using it, unless Peter (in)conveniently forgot/didn't know up until the very end. The best guess I have is that control fell back to Peter after Beck's death somehow, but I have no proof.



I've seen a couple of posts on other sites, but they all seem like conjecture and speculation. Nothing official.










share|improve this question














Now, I could easily be missing a detail here, but my understanding is that the following steps occurred (obvious spoilers):




  1. Peter gets EDITH and "registers" himself using the glasses.

  2. Peter 'befriends' Beck and determines he's better suited to use EDITH. Peter transfers full control of EDITH to Beck.

  3. Betrayal and shenanigans from Beck/Mysterio ensues, ending with Beck's death.

  4. Peter takes back control of EDITH somehow (and without any indication of a transfer of control?) and orders them to abort.


How was #4 possible given the fact that Peter gave up control? I wouldn't have assumed they could both have control, since Peter never attempts to give EDITH commands during the time Beck is using it, unless Peter (in)conveniently forgot/didn't know up until the very end. The best guess I have is that control fell back to Peter after Beck's death somehow, but I have no proof.



I've seen a couple of posts on other sites, but they all seem like conjecture and speculation. Nothing official.







marvel marvel-cinematic-universe spider-man-far-from-home






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked 8 hours ago









Broots WaymbBroots Waymb

9952 gold badges15 silver badges28 bronze badges




9952 gold badges15 silver badges28 bronze badges








  • 1





    movies.stackexchange.com/questions/101957/…

    – Raj
    8 hours ago






  • 1





    @Raj - I must be blind because that's pretty much what I was looking for. Assuming their vague wording is why it didn't crop up in my Google searches... It's still more speculative-y than I'd prefer, but perhaps the best we have right now.

    – Broots Waymb
    8 hours ago













  • The reason Peter couldn't issue orders to EDITH until he had taken the glasses back is presumably simply that he needed to be wearing the glasses. Do we see anyone give EDITH orders without them?

    – Harry Johnston
    7 hours ago














  • 1





    movies.stackexchange.com/questions/101957/…

    – Raj
    8 hours ago






  • 1





    @Raj - I must be blind because that's pretty much what I was looking for. Assuming their vague wording is why it didn't crop up in my Google searches... It's still more speculative-y than I'd prefer, but perhaps the best we have right now.

    – Broots Waymb
    8 hours ago













  • The reason Peter couldn't issue orders to EDITH until he had taken the glasses back is presumably simply that he needed to be wearing the glasses. Do we see anyone give EDITH orders without them?

    – Harry Johnston
    7 hours ago








1




1





movies.stackexchange.com/questions/101957/…

– Raj
8 hours ago





movies.stackexchange.com/questions/101957/…

– Raj
8 hours ago




1




1





@Raj - I must be blind because that's pretty much what I was looking for. Assuming their vague wording is why it didn't crop up in my Google searches... It's still more speculative-y than I'd prefer, but perhaps the best we have right now.

– Broots Waymb
8 hours ago







@Raj - I must be blind because that's pretty much what I was looking for. Assuming their vague wording is why it didn't crop up in my Google searches... It's still more speculative-y than I'd prefer, but perhaps the best we have right now.

– Broots Waymb
8 hours ago















The reason Peter couldn't issue orders to EDITH until he had taken the glasses back is presumably simply that he needed to be wearing the glasses. Do we see anyone give EDITH orders without them?

– Harry Johnston
7 hours ago





The reason Peter couldn't issue orders to EDITH until he had taken the glasses back is presumably simply that he needed to be wearing the glasses. Do we see anyone give EDITH orders without them?

– Harry Johnston
7 hours ago










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















5














I can’t offer anything official on this, as far as I know there isn’t anything yet, but speculation offers up the most probable explanation.



Whilst Peter does “transfer” ownership to Beck EDITH only adds Beck as a user and doesn’t remove Peter from the system. This can be reasoned as Tony himself had to add Peter and presumably kept ownership himself in case he did survive the Time Heist and Battle for Earth saving an awkward conversation where he gives Peter the glasses then asks him to transfer ownership back.



As for why it didn’t transfer full ownership but rather only added Beck it seems to be a fail safe option. I bet Tony wouldn’t want anyone else to be able to take EDITH and lock him out of the system. So he probably did the same thing for Peter considering the glasses were only given to him upon his death.



It’s worth noting that Peter is able to use EDITH before Beck dies so that rules out one of your possible theories.






share|improve this answer


























    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "186"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fscifi.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f216155%2fhow-was-peter-parker-able-to-use-edith-in-the-end%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    5














    I can’t offer anything official on this, as far as I know there isn’t anything yet, but speculation offers up the most probable explanation.



    Whilst Peter does “transfer” ownership to Beck EDITH only adds Beck as a user and doesn’t remove Peter from the system. This can be reasoned as Tony himself had to add Peter and presumably kept ownership himself in case he did survive the Time Heist and Battle for Earth saving an awkward conversation where he gives Peter the glasses then asks him to transfer ownership back.



    As for why it didn’t transfer full ownership but rather only added Beck it seems to be a fail safe option. I bet Tony wouldn’t want anyone else to be able to take EDITH and lock him out of the system. So he probably did the same thing for Peter considering the glasses were only given to him upon his death.



    It’s worth noting that Peter is able to use EDITH before Beck dies so that rules out one of your possible theories.






    share|improve this answer




























      5














      I can’t offer anything official on this, as far as I know there isn’t anything yet, but speculation offers up the most probable explanation.



      Whilst Peter does “transfer” ownership to Beck EDITH only adds Beck as a user and doesn’t remove Peter from the system. This can be reasoned as Tony himself had to add Peter and presumably kept ownership himself in case he did survive the Time Heist and Battle for Earth saving an awkward conversation where he gives Peter the glasses then asks him to transfer ownership back.



      As for why it didn’t transfer full ownership but rather only added Beck it seems to be a fail safe option. I bet Tony wouldn’t want anyone else to be able to take EDITH and lock him out of the system. So he probably did the same thing for Peter considering the glasses were only given to him upon his death.



      It’s worth noting that Peter is able to use EDITH before Beck dies so that rules out one of your possible theories.






      share|improve this answer


























        5












        5








        5







        I can’t offer anything official on this, as far as I know there isn’t anything yet, but speculation offers up the most probable explanation.



        Whilst Peter does “transfer” ownership to Beck EDITH only adds Beck as a user and doesn’t remove Peter from the system. This can be reasoned as Tony himself had to add Peter and presumably kept ownership himself in case he did survive the Time Heist and Battle for Earth saving an awkward conversation where he gives Peter the glasses then asks him to transfer ownership back.



        As for why it didn’t transfer full ownership but rather only added Beck it seems to be a fail safe option. I bet Tony wouldn’t want anyone else to be able to take EDITH and lock him out of the system. So he probably did the same thing for Peter considering the glasses were only given to him upon his death.



        It’s worth noting that Peter is able to use EDITH before Beck dies so that rules out one of your possible theories.






        share|improve this answer













        I can’t offer anything official on this, as far as I know there isn’t anything yet, but speculation offers up the most probable explanation.



        Whilst Peter does “transfer” ownership to Beck EDITH only adds Beck as a user and doesn’t remove Peter from the system. This can be reasoned as Tony himself had to add Peter and presumably kept ownership himself in case he did survive the Time Heist and Battle for Earth saving an awkward conversation where he gives Peter the glasses then asks him to transfer ownership back.



        As for why it didn’t transfer full ownership but rather only added Beck it seems to be a fail safe option. I bet Tony wouldn’t want anyone else to be able to take EDITH and lock him out of the system. So he probably did the same thing for Peter considering the glasses were only given to him upon his death.



        It’s worth noting that Peter is able to use EDITH before Beck dies so that rules out one of your possible theories.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered 8 hours ago









        TheLethalCarrotTheLethalCarrot

        68.4k29 gold badges446 silver badges490 bronze badges




        68.4k29 gold badges446 silver badges490 bronze badges






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Science Fiction & Fantasy Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fscifi.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f216155%2fhow-was-peter-parker-able-to-use-edith-in-the-end%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Taj Mahal Inhaltsverzeichnis Aufbau | Geschichte | 350-Jahr-Feier | Heutige Bedeutung | Siehe auch |...

            Baia Sprie Cuprins Etimologie | Istorie | Demografie | Politică și administrație | Arii naturale...

            Nicolae Petrescu-Găină Cuprins Biografie | Opera | In memoriam | Varia | Controverse, incertitudini...