Are there any NP complete problems in SUB EXP TIME?A polynomial reduction from any NP-complete problem to...

SHA3-255, one bit less

Does it require less energy to reach the Sun from Pluto's orbit than from Earth's orbit?

Tikz background color of node multilayer

Does the US Armed Forces refuse to recruit anyone with an IQ less than 83?

"cd" into /sys/kernel/debug/tracing causes permission change

Redirect output on-the-fly - looks not possible in Linux, why?

Bothered by watching coworkers slacking off

Advices to added homemade symbols

Would houseruling two or more instances of resistance to the same element as immunity be overly unbalanced?

Is there any problem with students seeing faculty naked in university gym?

Driving test in New Zealand?

What's the difference between motherboard and chassis?

Did Joe Biden "stop a prosecution" into his son in Ukraine? And did he brag about stopping the prosecution?

How fast are we moving relative to the CMB?

Can 35 mm film which went through a washing machine still be developed?

"last" command not working properly

What are some ways to season that don't rely on garlic and onions?

Search for something difficult to count/estimate

Is right click on tables bad UX

How is the speed of nucleons in the nucleus measured?

What’s the BrE for “shotgun wedding”?

Why is the time of useful consciousness only seconds at high altitudes?

What does a textbook look like while you are writing it?

Manager told a colleague of mine I was getting fired soon



Are there any NP complete problems in SUB EXP TIME?


A polynomial reduction from any NP-complete problem to bounded PCPResource bounded reductions for RE-Complete problemsDo there exist “O(1)-complete” problems?Is there an NP-complete problem that can be solved in $O(n^{log n})$ time?Computationally 'hard' polynomial-time reduction to other NP-complete problems / Hierarchy of NP-complete problemsIs there any polynomial time algorithm for a restricted EXP-time problem?Problems that feel exponential but are PWhy is $ZPP geq BPP$ not true?






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{
margin-bottom:0;
}








3












$begingroup$


Generally most np complete problems seem to have the best strategies operate in time $O(c^n$) for some choice of $c$



Has something like $O(2^sqrt{n})$ (or any other less than exponential but greater than polynomial running time) ever been encountered in the wild as a run time for an algorithm that solves an NP complete problem?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$














  • $begingroup$
    According to the ETH np-complete problems does not have $2^{o(n)}$ time complexity.
    $endgroup$
    – Mohsen Ghorbani
    11 hours ago








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    No, the ETH refers only to SAT, not to all NP-complete problems.
    $endgroup$
    – Hermann Gruber
    11 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Yes my bad... but I think there are not known np-complete solvable in $2^{o(n)}$, also padded version of SAT(or any npc) has the property you want.
    $endgroup$
    – Mohsen Ghorbani
    10 hours ago


















3












$begingroup$


Generally most np complete problems seem to have the best strategies operate in time $O(c^n$) for some choice of $c$



Has something like $O(2^sqrt{n})$ (or any other less than exponential but greater than polynomial running time) ever been encountered in the wild as a run time for an algorithm that solves an NP complete problem?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$














  • $begingroup$
    According to the ETH np-complete problems does not have $2^{o(n)}$ time complexity.
    $endgroup$
    – Mohsen Ghorbani
    11 hours ago








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    No, the ETH refers only to SAT, not to all NP-complete problems.
    $endgroup$
    – Hermann Gruber
    11 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Yes my bad... but I think there are not known np-complete solvable in $2^{o(n)}$, also padded version of SAT(or any npc) has the property you want.
    $endgroup$
    – Mohsen Ghorbani
    10 hours ago














3












3








3


1



$begingroup$


Generally most np complete problems seem to have the best strategies operate in time $O(c^n$) for some choice of $c$



Has something like $O(2^sqrt{n})$ (or any other less than exponential but greater than polynomial running time) ever been encountered in the wild as a run time for an algorithm that solves an NP complete problem?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




Generally most np complete problems seem to have the best strategies operate in time $O(c^n$) for some choice of $c$



Has something like $O(2^sqrt{n})$ (or any other less than exponential but greater than polynomial running time) ever been encountered in the wild as a run time for an algorithm that solves an NP complete problem?







complexity-theory






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked 12 hours ago









frogeyedpeasfrogeyedpeas

1931 silver badge7 bronze badges




1931 silver badge7 bronze badges















  • $begingroup$
    According to the ETH np-complete problems does not have $2^{o(n)}$ time complexity.
    $endgroup$
    – Mohsen Ghorbani
    11 hours ago








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    No, the ETH refers only to SAT, not to all NP-complete problems.
    $endgroup$
    – Hermann Gruber
    11 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Yes my bad... but I think there are not known np-complete solvable in $2^{o(n)}$, also padded version of SAT(or any npc) has the property you want.
    $endgroup$
    – Mohsen Ghorbani
    10 hours ago


















  • $begingroup$
    According to the ETH np-complete problems does not have $2^{o(n)}$ time complexity.
    $endgroup$
    – Mohsen Ghorbani
    11 hours ago








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    No, the ETH refers only to SAT, not to all NP-complete problems.
    $endgroup$
    – Hermann Gruber
    11 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Yes my bad... but I think there are not known np-complete solvable in $2^{o(n)}$, also padded version of SAT(or any npc) has the property you want.
    $endgroup$
    – Mohsen Ghorbani
    10 hours ago
















$begingroup$
According to the ETH np-complete problems does not have $2^{o(n)}$ time complexity.
$endgroup$
– Mohsen Ghorbani
11 hours ago






$begingroup$
According to the ETH np-complete problems does not have $2^{o(n)}$ time complexity.
$endgroup$
– Mohsen Ghorbani
11 hours ago






1




1




$begingroup$
No, the ETH refers only to SAT, not to all NP-complete problems.
$endgroup$
– Hermann Gruber
11 hours ago




$begingroup$
No, the ETH refers only to SAT, not to all NP-complete problems.
$endgroup$
– Hermann Gruber
11 hours ago












$begingroup$
Yes my bad... but I think there are not known np-complete solvable in $2^{o(n)}$, also padded version of SAT(or any npc) has the property you want.
$endgroup$
– Mohsen Ghorbani
10 hours ago




$begingroup$
Yes my bad... but I think there are not known np-complete solvable in $2^{o(n)}$, also padded version of SAT(or any npc) has the property you want.
$endgroup$
– Mohsen Ghorbani
10 hours ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















4














$begingroup$

The maximum clique problem on graphs with $m$ edges is solvable in time $2^{O(sqrt m)}$. See Lemma 11.6 in F. Fomin and D. Kratsch, exact exponential algorithms, Springer, 2010. Also, note that PLANAR 3-SAT, while NP-complete, is solvable in time $2^{O(sqrt n)}$, where $n$ denotes the number of vertices: https://cstheory.stackexchange.com/questions/30883/are-there-subexponential-algorithms-for-planar-sat-known






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$























    0














    $begingroup$

    Suppose there is a $O(2^n)$ time algorithm for set $L$ and $L in NP-complete$. define $L'={1^{n^c-n}l| lin L& |l|=n }$ it is easy to prove that $L' in NP-complete$ and there is a $O(2^{sqrt[c]{n}})$ time algorithm for $L'$. On the other hand according to ETH $SAT$ can't be solved in time $2^{o(n)}$ and it is enough to conclude that there are no $NP$-complete such that solvable in time $n^{poly(log n)}$. The best known algorithm for 3-SAT is in time $1.3^n$ or at least near this number.






    share|cite









    $endgroup$

















      Your Answer








      StackExchange.ready(function() {
      var channelOptions = {
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "419"
      };
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
      createEditor();
      });
      }
      else {
      createEditor();
      }
      });

      function createEditor() {
      StackExchange.prepareEditor({
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: false,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: null,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader: {
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/"u003ecc by-sa 4.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      },
      onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      });


      }
      });















      draft saved

      draft discarded
















      StackExchange.ready(
      function () {
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcs.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f115167%2fare-there-any-np-complete-problems-in-sub-exp-time%23new-answer', 'question_page');
      }
      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes








      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      4














      $begingroup$

      The maximum clique problem on graphs with $m$ edges is solvable in time $2^{O(sqrt m)}$. See Lemma 11.6 in F. Fomin and D. Kratsch, exact exponential algorithms, Springer, 2010. Also, note that PLANAR 3-SAT, while NP-complete, is solvable in time $2^{O(sqrt n)}$, where $n$ denotes the number of vertices: https://cstheory.stackexchange.com/questions/30883/are-there-subexponential-algorithms-for-planar-sat-known






      share|cite|improve this answer











      $endgroup$




















        4














        $begingroup$

        The maximum clique problem on graphs with $m$ edges is solvable in time $2^{O(sqrt m)}$. See Lemma 11.6 in F. Fomin and D. Kratsch, exact exponential algorithms, Springer, 2010. Also, note that PLANAR 3-SAT, while NP-complete, is solvable in time $2^{O(sqrt n)}$, where $n$ denotes the number of vertices: https://cstheory.stackexchange.com/questions/30883/are-there-subexponential-algorithms-for-planar-sat-known






        share|cite|improve this answer











        $endgroup$


















          4














          4










          4







          $begingroup$

          The maximum clique problem on graphs with $m$ edges is solvable in time $2^{O(sqrt m)}$. See Lemma 11.6 in F. Fomin and D. Kratsch, exact exponential algorithms, Springer, 2010. Also, note that PLANAR 3-SAT, while NP-complete, is solvable in time $2^{O(sqrt n)}$, where $n$ denotes the number of vertices: https://cstheory.stackexchange.com/questions/30883/are-there-subexponential-algorithms-for-planar-sat-known






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$



          The maximum clique problem on graphs with $m$ edges is solvable in time $2^{O(sqrt m)}$. See Lemma 11.6 in F. Fomin and D. Kratsch, exact exponential algorithms, Springer, 2010. Also, note that PLANAR 3-SAT, while NP-complete, is solvable in time $2^{O(sqrt n)}$, where $n$ denotes the number of vertices: https://cstheory.stackexchange.com/questions/30883/are-there-subexponential-algorithms-for-planar-sat-known







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited 7 hours ago

























          answered 11 hours ago









          Hermann GruberHermann Gruber

          1755 bronze badges




          1755 bronze badges




























              0














              $begingroup$

              Suppose there is a $O(2^n)$ time algorithm for set $L$ and $L in NP-complete$. define $L'={1^{n^c-n}l| lin L& |l|=n }$ it is easy to prove that $L' in NP-complete$ and there is a $O(2^{sqrt[c]{n}})$ time algorithm for $L'$. On the other hand according to ETH $SAT$ can't be solved in time $2^{o(n)}$ and it is enough to conclude that there are no $NP$-complete such that solvable in time $n^{poly(log n)}$. The best known algorithm for 3-SAT is in time $1.3^n$ or at least near this number.






              share|cite









              $endgroup$




















                0














                $begingroup$

                Suppose there is a $O(2^n)$ time algorithm for set $L$ and $L in NP-complete$. define $L'={1^{n^c-n}l| lin L& |l|=n }$ it is easy to prove that $L' in NP-complete$ and there is a $O(2^{sqrt[c]{n}})$ time algorithm for $L'$. On the other hand according to ETH $SAT$ can't be solved in time $2^{o(n)}$ and it is enough to conclude that there are no $NP$-complete such that solvable in time $n^{poly(log n)}$. The best known algorithm for 3-SAT is in time $1.3^n$ or at least near this number.






                share|cite









                $endgroup$


















                  0














                  0










                  0







                  $begingroup$

                  Suppose there is a $O(2^n)$ time algorithm for set $L$ and $L in NP-complete$. define $L'={1^{n^c-n}l| lin L& |l|=n }$ it is easy to prove that $L' in NP-complete$ and there is a $O(2^{sqrt[c]{n}})$ time algorithm for $L'$. On the other hand according to ETH $SAT$ can't be solved in time $2^{o(n)}$ and it is enough to conclude that there are no $NP$-complete such that solvable in time $n^{poly(log n)}$. The best known algorithm for 3-SAT is in time $1.3^n$ or at least near this number.






                  share|cite









                  $endgroup$



                  Suppose there is a $O(2^n)$ time algorithm for set $L$ and $L in NP-complete$. define $L'={1^{n^c-n}l| lin L& |l|=n }$ it is easy to prove that $L' in NP-complete$ and there is a $O(2^{sqrt[c]{n}})$ time algorithm for $L'$. On the other hand according to ETH $SAT$ can't be solved in time $2^{o(n)}$ and it is enough to conclude that there are no $NP$-complete such that solvable in time $n^{poly(log n)}$. The best known algorithm for 3-SAT is in time $1.3^n$ or at least near this number.







                  share|cite












                  share|cite



                  share|cite










                  answered 2 mins ago









                  Mohsen GhorbaniMohsen Ghorbani

                  1722 silver badges9 bronze badges




                  1722 silver badges9 bronze badges


































                      draft saved

                      draft discarded



















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Computer Science Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function () {
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcs.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f115167%2fare-there-any-np-complete-problems-in-sub-exp-time%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                      }
                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Taj Mahal Inhaltsverzeichnis Aufbau | Geschichte | 350-Jahr-Feier | Heutige Bedeutung | Siehe auch |...

                      Baia Sprie Cuprins Etimologie | Istorie | Demografie | Politică și administrație | Arii naturale...

                      Nicolae Petrescu-Găină Cuprins Biografie | Opera | In memoriam | Varia | Controverse, incertitudini...