Degenerate Gaussian IntegralWhat are the origin and applications of this result?Expectation under a...
Degenerate Gaussian Integral
What are the origin and applications of this result?Expectation under a t-distributionEquivalence between choosing a subspace and choosing its orthogonalRegression with correlation structureExpectation involving maximum of Gaussian variablesQuantifying the effect of noise on the posterior variance in Gaussian processes / multivariate Gaussian vectorsApproximating the mathematical expectation of the argmax of a Gaussian random vector
$begingroup$
I have an integral over a subspace of $mathbb{R}^n times mathbb{R}^n$ with an integrand of the form
$$expleft(-frac{1}{2}left[||u^2|| + langle u, v rangle + ||v||^2right]right)$$
The subspace is exactly the space for which $u_{i} = u_{n-i}$ (assume $n$ is even). In other words, $v$ is a true $n$-dimensional vector, whereas $u$ is two copies of an $n/2$ dimensional vector.
In order to evaluate this integral, I have been thinking about it as a density over ALL of $mathbb{R}^n times mathbb{R}^n$ of two correlated Gaussians with covariance given by the block matrix
$$begin{bmatrix}
A & B \ B^t & C
end{bmatrix}
$$
where $A,C$ are $n times n$ identity matrices and $B$ is the block matrix
$$begin{bmatrix}
I_{n/2} & I_{n/2} \ 0 & 0
end{bmatrix}
$$
However, given that this is degenerate, I am having trouble finishing the computation. Would greatly appreciate any tips!
pr.probability st.statistics probability-distributions
$endgroup$
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
I have an integral over a subspace of $mathbb{R}^n times mathbb{R}^n$ with an integrand of the form
$$expleft(-frac{1}{2}left[||u^2|| + langle u, v rangle + ||v||^2right]right)$$
The subspace is exactly the space for which $u_{i} = u_{n-i}$ (assume $n$ is even). In other words, $v$ is a true $n$-dimensional vector, whereas $u$ is two copies of an $n/2$ dimensional vector.
In order to evaluate this integral, I have been thinking about it as a density over ALL of $mathbb{R}^n times mathbb{R}^n$ of two correlated Gaussians with covariance given by the block matrix
$$begin{bmatrix}
A & B \ B^t & C
end{bmatrix}
$$
where $A,C$ are $n times n$ identity matrices and $B$ is the block matrix
$$begin{bmatrix}
I_{n/2} & I_{n/2} \ 0 & 0
end{bmatrix}
$$
However, given that this is degenerate, I am having trouble finishing the computation. Would greatly appreciate any tips!
pr.probability st.statistics probability-distributions
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Just want to make sure you don't actually mean inner product of u and v to have a coefficient of 2--that's how these integrals usually look because inner product of u+v with itself yields a coefficient of 2 on the middle term. This would make Iosef's answer even simpler.
$endgroup$
– Sheridan Grant
4 hours ago
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
I have an integral over a subspace of $mathbb{R}^n times mathbb{R}^n$ with an integrand of the form
$$expleft(-frac{1}{2}left[||u^2|| + langle u, v rangle + ||v||^2right]right)$$
The subspace is exactly the space for which $u_{i} = u_{n-i}$ (assume $n$ is even). In other words, $v$ is a true $n$-dimensional vector, whereas $u$ is two copies of an $n/2$ dimensional vector.
In order to evaluate this integral, I have been thinking about it as a density over ALL of $mathbb{R}^n times mathbb{R}^n$ of two correlated Gaussians with covariance given by the block matrix
$$begin{bmatrix}
A & B \ B^t & C
end{bmatrix}
$$
where $A,C$ are $n times n$ identity matrices and $B$ is the block matrix
$$begin{bmatrix}
I_{n/2} & I_{n/2} \ 0 & 0
end{bmatrix}
$$
However, given that this is degenerate, I am having trouble finishing the computation. Would greatly appreciate any tips!
pr.probability st.statistics probability-distributions
$endgroup$
I have an integral over a subspace of $mathbb{R}^n times mathbb{R}^n$ with an integrand of the form
$$expleft(-frac{1}{2}left[||u^2|| + langle u, v rangle + ||v||^2right]right)$$
The subspace is exactly the space for which $u_{i} = u_{n-i}$ (assume $n$ is even). In other words, $v$ is a true $n$-dimensional vector, whereas $u$ is two copies of an $n/2$ dimensional vector.
In order to evaluate this integral, I have been thinking about it as a density over ALL of $mathbb{R}^n times mathbb{R}^n$ of two correlated Gaussians with covariance given by the block matrix
$$begin{bmatrix}
A & B \ B^t & C
end{bmatrix}
$$
where $A,C$ are $n times n$ identity matrices and $B$ is the block matrix
$$begin{bmatrix}
I_{n/2} & I_{n/2} \ 0 & 0
end{bmatrix}
$$
However, given that this is degenerate, I am having trouble finishing the computation. Would greatly appreciate any tips!
pr.probability st.statistics probability-distributions
pr.probability st.statistics probability-distributions
asked 8 hours ago
DJADJA
854 bronze badges
854 bronze badges
$begingroup$
Just want to make sure you don't actually mean inner product of u and v to have a coefficient of 2--that's how these integrals usually look because inner product of u+v with itself yields a coefficient of 2 on the middle term. This would make Iosef's answer even simpler.
$endgroup$
– Sheridan Grant
4 hours ago
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
Just want to make sure you don't actually mean inner product of u and v to have a coefficient of 2--that's how these integrals usually look because inner product of u+v with itself yields a coefficient of 2 on the middle term. This would make Iosef's answer even simpler.
$endgroup$
– Sheridan Grant
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
Just want to make sure you don't actually mean inner product of u and v to have a coefficient of 2--that's how these integrals usually look because inner product of u+v with itself yields a coefficient of 2 on the middle term. This would make Iosef's answer even simpler.
$endgroup$
– Sheridan Grant
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
Just want to make sure you don't actually mean inner product of u and v to have a coefficient of 2--that's how these integrals usually look because inner product of u+v with itself yields a coefficient of 2 on the middle term. This would make Iosef's answer even simpler.
$endgroup$
– Sheridan Grant
4 hours ago
add a comment
|
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
$newcommand{R}{mathbb{R}}$
Let $U:={uinR^ncolon u_i=u_{n-i} forall i}$ be your $n/2$-dimensional subspace. I am assuming that your integral is with respect to the product of the Lebesgue measures on $U$ and $R^n$, and I will denote those measures by $du$ and $dv$, respectively. So, if $cdot$ denotes the dot product, your integral is
begin{align}
I&:=int_U du,int_{R^n}dv,expbig(-(|u|^2+ucdot v+|v|^2)/2big) \
&=int_U du,int_{R^n}dv,expbig(-(3|u|^2/4+|v+u/2|^2)/2big) \
&=int_U du,int_{R^n}dw,expbig(-(3|u|^2/4+|w|^2)/2big) \
&=(2pi)^{n/2}int_U du,expbig(-3|u|^2/8big) \
&=(2pi)^{n/2}int_{R^{n/2}} dt,expbig(-3|t|^2/8big) \
&=(2pi)^{n/2}(2pi)^{n/4}(4/3)^{n/4}.
end{align}
The penultimate equality here holds because both the Euclidean norm and the Lebesgue measure are rotation invariant, whereas the dimension of $U$ is $n/2$; in fact, this is how the Lebesgue measure on $U$ can/should be defined: by the condition that
begin{equation}
int_U du,f(u)=int_{R^{n/2}} dt,f(Tt)
end{equation}
for all nonnegative Borel-measurable functions $fcolon UtoR$, where $TcolonR^{n/2}to U$ is a linear isomorphism.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Ah, I see. It is as simple as just factoring and completing the square? Thanks for your quick + helpful answers Iosif!
$endgroup$
– DJA
6 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@DJA : From my viewpoint, the main thing here is to properly/conveniently define the Lebesgue measure on a linear subspace.
$endgroup$
– Iosif Pinelis
5 hours ago
add a comment
|
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "504"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/"u003ecc by-sa 4.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathoverflow.net%2fquestions%2f341666%2fdegenerate-gaussian-integral%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
$newcommand{R}{mathbb{R}}$
Let $U:={uinR^ncolon u_i=u_{n-i} forall i}$ be your $n/2$-dimensional subspace. I am assuming that your integral is with respect to the product of the Lebesgue measures on $U$ and $R^n$, and I will denote those measures by $du$ and $dv$, respectively. So, if $cdot$ denotes the dot product, your integral is
begin{align}
I&:=int_U du,int_{R^n}dv,expbig(-(|u|^2+ucdot v+|v|^2)/2big) \
&=int_U du,int_{R^n}dv,expbig(-(3|u|^2/4+|v+u/2|^2)/2big) \
&=int_U du,int_{R^n}dw,expbig(-(3|u|^2/4+|w|^2)/2big) \
&=(2pi)^{n/2}int_U du,expbig(-3|u|^2/8big) \
&=(2pi)^{n/2}int_{R^{n/2}} dt,expbig(-3|t|^2/8big) \
&=(2pi)^{n/2}(2pi)^{n/4}(4/3)^{n/4}.
end{align}
The penultimate equality here holds because both the Euclidean norm and the Lebesgue measure are rotation invariant, whereas the dimension of $U$ is $n/2$; in fact, this is how the Lebesgue measure on $U$ can/should be defined: by the condition that
begin{equation}
int_U du,f(u)=int_{R^{n/2}} dt,f(Tt)
end{equation}
for all nonnegative Borel-measurable functions $fcolon UtoR$, where $TcolonR^{n/2}to U$ is a linear isomorphism.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Ah, I see. It is as simple as just factoring and completing the square? Thanks for your quick + helpful answers Iosif!
$endgroup$
– DJA
6 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@DJA : From my viewpoint, the main thing here is to properly/conveniently define the Lebesgue measure on a linear subspace.
$endgroup$
– Iosif Pinelis
5 hours ago
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
$newcommand{R}{mathbb{R}}$
Let $U:={uinR^ncolon u_i=u_{n-i} forall i}$ be your $n/2$-dimensional subspace. I am assuming that your integral is with respect to the product of the Lebesgue measures on $U$ and $R^n$, and I will denote those measures by $du$ and $dv$, respectively. So, if $cdot$ denotes the dot product, your integral is
begin{align}
I&:=int_U du,int_{R^n}dv,expbig(-(|u|^2+ucdot v+|v|^2)/2big) \
&=int_U du,int_{R^n}dv,expbig(-(3|u|^2/4+|v+u/2|^2)/2big) \
&=int_U du,int_{R^n}dw,expbig(-(3|u|^2/4+|w|^2)/2big) \
&=(2pi)^{n/2}int_U du,expbig(-3|u|^2/8big) \
&=(2pi)^{n/2}int_{R^{n/2}} dt,expbig(-3|t|^2/8big) \
&=(2pi)^{n/2}(2pi)^{n/4}(4/3)^{n/4}.
end{align}
The penultimate equality here holds because both the Euclidean norm and the Lebesgue measure are rotation invariant, whereas the dimension of $U$ is $n/2$; in fact, this is how the Lebesgue measure on $U$ can/should be defined: by the condition that
begin{equation}
int_U du,f(u)=int_{R^{n/2}} dt,f(Tt)
end{equation}
for all nonnegative Borel-measurable functions $fcolon UtoR$, where $TcolonR^{n/2}to U$ is a linear isomorphism.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Ah, I see. It is as simple as just factoring and completing the square? Thanks for your quick + helpful answers Iosif!
$endgroup$
– DJA
6 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@DJA : From my viewpoint, the main thing here is to properly/conveniently define the Lebesgue measure on a linear subspace.
$endgroup$
– Iosif Pinelis
5 hours ago
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
$newcommand{R}{mathbb{R}}$
Let $U:={uinR^ncolon u_i=u_{n-i} forall i}$ be your $n/2$-dimensional subspace. I am assuming that your integral is with respect to the product of the Lebesgue measures on $U$ and $R^n$, and I will denote those measures by $du$ and $dv$, respectively. So, if $cdot$ denotes the dot product, your integral is
begin{align}
I&:=int_U du,int_{R^n}dv,expbig(-(|u|^2+ucdot v+|v|^2)/2big) \
&=int_U du,int_{R^n}dv,expbig(-(3|u|^2/4+|v+u/2|^2)/2big) \
&=int_U du,int_{R^n}dw,expbig(-(3|u|^2/4+|w|^2)/2big) \
&=(2pi)^{n/2}int_U du,expbig(-3|u|^2/8big) \
&=(2pi)^{n/2}int_{R^{n/2}} dt,expbig(-3|t|^2/8big) \
&=(2pi)^{n/2}(2pi)^{n/4}(4/3)^{n/4}.
end{align}
The penultimate equality here holds because both the Euclidean norm and the Lebesgue measure are rotation invariant, whereas the dimension of $U$ is $n/2$; in fact, this is how the Lebesgue measure on $U$ can/should be defined: by the condition that
begin{equation}
int_U du,f(u)=int_{R^{n/2}} dt,f(Tt)
end{equation}
for all nonnegative Borel-measurable functions $fcolon UtoR$, where $TcolonR^{n/2}to U$ is a linear isomorphism.
$endgroup$
$newcommand{R}{mathbb{R}}$
Let $U:={uinR^ncolon u_i=u_{n-i} forall i}$ be your $n/2$-dimensional subspace. I am assuming that your integral is with respect to the product of the Lebesgue measures on $U$ and $R^n$, and I will denote those measures by $du$ and $dv$, respectively. So, if $cdot$ denotes the dot product, your integral is
begin{align}
I&:=int_U du,int_{R^n}dv,expbig(-(|u|^2+ucdot v+|v|^2)/2big) \
&=int_U du,int_{R^n}dv,expbig(-(3|u|^2/4+|v+u/2|^2)/2big) \
&=int_U du,int_{R^n}dw,expbig(-(3|u|^2/4+|w|^2)/2big) \
&=(2pi)^{n/2}int_U du,expbig(-3|u|^2/8big) \
&=(2pi)^{n/2}int_{R^{n/2}} dt,expbig(-3|t|^2/8big) \
&=(2pi)^{n/2}(2pi)^{n/4}(4/3)^{n/4}.
end{align}
The penultimate equality here holds because both the Euclidean norm and the Lebesgue measure are rotation invariant, whereas the dimension of $U$ is $n/2$; in fact, this is how the Lebesgue measure on $U$ can/should be defined: by the condition that
begin{equation}
int_U du,f(u)=int_{R^{n/2}} dt,f(Tt)
end{equation}
for all nonnegative Borel-measurable functions $fcolon UtoR$, where $TcolonR^{n/2}to U$ is a linear isomorphism.
edited 7 hours ago
answered 7 hours ago
Iosif PinelisIosif Pinelis
25.5k3 gold badges30 silver badges69 bronze badges
25.5k3 gold badges30 silver badges69 bronze badges
1
$begingroup$
Ah, I see. It is as simple as just factoring and completing the square? Thanks for your quick + helpful answers Iosif!
$endgroup$
– DJA
6 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@DJA : From my viewpoint, the main thing here is to properly/conveniently define the Lebesgue measure on a linear subspace.
$endgroup$
– Iosif Pinelis
5 hours ago
add a comment
|
1
$begingroup$
Ah, I see. It is as simple as just factoring and completing the square? Thanks for your quick + helpful answers Iosif!
$endgroup$
– DJA
6 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@DJA : From my viewpoint, the main thing here is to properly/conveniently define the Lebesgue measure on a linear subspace.
$endgroup$
– Iosif Pinelis
5 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
Ah, I see. It is as simple as just factoring and completing the square? Thanks for your quick + helpful answers Iosif!
$endgroup$
– DJA
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
Ah, I see. It is as simple as just factoring and completing the square? Thanks for your quick + helpful answers Iosif!
$endgroup$
– DJA
6 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
@DJA : From my viewpoint, the main thing here is to properly/conveniently define the Lebesgue measure on a linear subspace.
$endgroup$
– Iosif Pinelis
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
@DJA : From my viewpoint, the main thing here is to properly/conveniently define the Lebesgue measure on a linear subspace.
$endgroup$
– Iosif Pinelis
5 hours ago
add a comment
|
Thanks for contributing an answer to MathOverflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathoverflow.net%2fquestions%2f341666%2fdegenerate-gaussian-integral%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
Just want to make sure you don't actually mean inner product of u and v to have a coefficient of 2--that's how these integrals usually look because inner product of u+v with itself yields a coefficient of 2 on the middle term. This would make Iosef's answer even simpler.
$endgroup$
– Sheridan Grant
4 hours ago