Degenerate Gaussian IntegralWhat are the origin and applications of this result?Expectation under a...



Degenerate Gaussian Integral


What are the origin and applications of this result?Expectation under a t-distributionEquivalence between choosing a subspace and choosing its orthogonalRegression with correlation structureExpectation involving maximum of Gaussian variablesQuantifying the effect of noise on the posterior variance in Gaussian processes / multivariate Gaussian vectorsApproximating the mathematical expectation of the argmax of a Gaussian random vector













2












$begingroup$


I have an integral over a subspace of $mathbb{R}^n times mathbb{R}^n$ with an integrand of the form
$$expleft(-frac{1}{2}left[||u^2|| + langle u, v rangle + ||v||^2right]right)$$
The subspace is exactly the space for which $u_{i} = u_{n-i}$ (assume $n$ is even). In other words, $v$ is a true $n$-dimensional vector, whereas $u$ is two copies of an $n/2$ dimensional vector.



In order to evaluate this integral, I have been thinking about it as a density over ALL of $mathbb{R}^n times mathbb{R}^n$ of two correlated Gaussians with covariance given by the block matrix
$$begin{bmatrix}
A & B \ B^t & C
end{bmatrix}
$$

where $A,C$ are $n times n$ identity matrices and $B$ is the block matrix
$$begin{bmatrix}
I_{n/2} & I_{n/2} \ 0 & 0
end{bmatrix}
$$

However, given that this is degenerate, I am having trouble finishing the computation. Would greatly appreciate any tips!










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$














  • $begingroup$
    Just want to make sure you don't actually mean inner product of u and v to have a coefficient of 2--that's how these integrals usually look because inner product of u+v with itself yields a coefficient of 2 on the middle term. This would make Iosef's answer even simpler.
    $endgroup$
    – Sheridan Grant
    4 hours ago
















2












$begingroup$


I have an integral over a subspace of $mathbb{R}^n times mathbb{R}^n$ with an integrand of the form
$$expleft(-frac{1}{2}left[||u^2|| + langle u, v rangle + ||v||^2right]right)$$
The subspace is exactly the space for which $u_{i} = u_{n-i}$ (assume $n$ is even). In other words, $v$ is a true $n$-dimensional vector, whereas $u$ is two copies of an $n/2$ dimensional vector.



In order to evaluate this integral, I have been thinking about it as a density over ALL of $mathbb{R}^n times mathbb{R}^n$ of two correlated Gaussians with covariance given by the block matrix
$$begin{bmatrix}
A & B \ B^t & C
end{bmatrix}
$$

where $A,C$ are $n times n$ identity matrices and $B$ is the block matrix
$$begin{bmatrix}
I_{n/2} & I_{n/2} \ 0 & 0
end{bmatrix}
$$

However, given that this is degenerate, I am having trouble finishing the computation. Would greatly appreciate any tips!










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$














  • $begingroup$
    Just want to make sure you don't actually mean inner product of u and v to have a coefficient of 2--that's how these integrals usually look because inner product of u+v with itself yields a coefficient of 2 on the middle term. This would make Iosef's answer even simpler.
    $endgroup$
    – Sheridan Grant
    4 hours ago














2












2








2


1



$begingroup$


I have an integral over a subspace of $mathbb{R}^n times mathbb{R}^n$ with an integrand of the form
$$expleft(-frac{1}{2}left[||u^2|| + langle u, v rangle + ||v||^2right]right)$$
The subspace is exactly the space for which $u_{i} = u_{n-i}$ (assume $n$ is even). In other words, $v$ is a true $n$-dimensional vector, whereas $u$ is two copies of an $n/2$ dimensional vector.



In order to evaluate this integral, I have been thinking about it as a density over ALL of $mathbb{R}^n times mathbb{R}^n$ of two correlated Gaussians with covariance given by the block matrix
$$begin{bmatrix}
A & B \ B^t & C
end{bmatrix}
$$

where $A,C$ are $n times n$ identity matrices and $B$ is the block matrix
$$begin{bmatrix}
I_{n/2} & I_{n/2} \ 0 & 0
end{bmatrix}
$$

However, given that this is degenerate, I am having trouble finishing the computation. Would greatly appreciate any tips!










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




I have an integral over a subspace of $mathbb{R}^n times mathbb{R}^n$ with an integrand of the form
$$expleft(-frac{1}{2}left[||u^2|| + langle u, v rangle + ||v||^2right]right)$$
The subspace is exactly the space for which $u_{i} = u_{n-i}$ (assume $n$ is even). In other words, $v$ is a true $n$-dimensional vector, whereas $u$ is two copies of an $n/2$ dimensional vector.



In order to evaluate this integral, I have been thinking about it as a density over ALL of $mathbb{R}^n times mathbb{R}^n$ of two correlated Gaussians with covariance given by the block matrix
$$begin{bmatrix}
A & B \ B^t & C
end{bmatrix}
$$

where $A,C$ are $n times n$ identity matrices and $B$ is the block matrix
$$begin{bmatrix}
I_{n/2} & I_{n/2} \ 0 & 0
end{bmatrix}
$$

However, given that this is degenerate, I am having trouble finishing the computation. Would greatly appreciate any tips!







pr.probability st.statistics probability-distributions






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked 8 hours ago









DJADJA

854 bronze badges




854 bronze badges















  • $begingroup$
    Just want to make sure you don't actually mean inner product of u and v to have a coefficient of 2--that's how these integrals usually look because inner product of u+v with itself yields a coefficient of 2 on the middle term. This would make Iosef's answer even simpler.
    $endgroup$
    – Sheridan Grant
    4 hours ago


















  • $begingroup$
    Just want to make sure you don't actually mean inner product of u and v to have a coefficient of 2--that's how these integrals usually look because inner product of u+v with itself yields a coefficient of 2 on the middle term. This would make Iosef's answer even simpler.
    $endgroup$
    – Sheridan Grant
    4 hours ago
















$begingroup$
Just want to make sure you don't actually mean inner product of u and v to have a coefficient of 2--that's how these integrals usually look because inner product of u+v with itself yields a coefficient of 2 on the middle term. This would make Iosef's answer even simpler.
$endgroup$
– Sheridan Grant
4 hours ago




$begingroup$
Just want to make sure you don't actually mean inner product of u and v to have a coefficient of 2--that's how these integrals usually look because inner product of u+v with itself yields a coefficient of 2 on the middle term. This would make Iosef's answer even simpler.
$endgroup$
– Sheridan Grant
4 hours ago










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















4














$begingroup$

$newcommand{R}{mathbb{R}}$
Let $U:={uinR^ncolon u_i=u_{n-i} forall i}$ be your $n/2$-dimensional subspace. I am assuming that your integral is with respect to the product of the Lebesgue measures on $U$ and $R^n$, and I will denote those measures by $du$ and $dv$, respectively. So, if $cdot$ denotes the dot product, your integral is
begin{align}
I&:=int_U du,int_{R^n}dv,expbig(-(|u|^2+ucdot v+|v|^2)/2big) \
&=int_U du,int_{R^n}dv,expbig(-(3|u|^2/4+|v+u/2|^2)/2big) \
&=int_U du,int_{R^n}dw,expbig(-(3|u|^2/4+|w|^2)/2big) \
&=(2pi)^{n/2}int_U du,expbig(-3|u|^2/8big) \
&=(2pi)^{n/2}int_{R^{n/2}} dt,expbig(-3|t|^2/8big) \
&=(2pi)^{n/2}(2pi)^{n/4}(4/3)^{n/4}.
end{align}

The penultimate equality here holds because both the Euclidean norm and the Lebesgue measure are rotation invariant, whereas the dimension of $U$ is $n/2$; in fact, this is how the Lebesgue measure on $U$ can/should be defined: by the condition that
begin{equation}
int_U du,f(u)=int_{R^{n/2}} dt,f(Tt)
end{equation}

for all nonnegative Borel-measurable functions $fcolon UtoR$, where $TcolonR^{n/2}to U$ is a linear isomorphism.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$











  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Ah, I see. It is as simple as just factoring and completing the square? Thanks for your quick + helpful answers Iosif!
    $endgroup$
    – DJA
    6 hours ago








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @DJA : From my viewpoint, the main thing here is to properly/conveniently define the Lebesgue measure on a linear subspace.
    $endgroup$
    – Iosif Pinelis
    5 hours ago














Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "504"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/"u003ecc by-sa 4.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});















draft saved

draft discarded
















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathoverflow.net%2fquestions%2f341666%2fdegenerate-gaussian-integral%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









4














$begingroup$

$newcommand{R}{mathbb{R}}$
Let $U:={uinR^ncolon u_i=u_{n-i} forall i}$ be your $n/2$-dimensional subspace. I am assuming that your integral is with respect to the product of the Lebesgue measures on $U$ and $R^n$, and I will denote those measures by $du$ and $dv$, respectively. So, if $cdot$ denotes the dot product, your integral is
begin{align}
I&:=int_U du,int_{R^n}dv,expbig(-(|u|^2+ucdot v+|v|^2)/2big) \
&=int_U du,int_{R^n}dv,expbig(-(3|u|^2/4+|v+u/2|^2)/2big) \
&=int_U du,int_{R^n}dw,expbig(-(3|u|^2/4+|w|^2)/2big) \
&=(2pi)^{n/2}int_U du,expbig(-3|u|^2/8big) \
&=(2pi)^{n/2}int_{R^{n/2}} dt,expbig(-3|t|^2/8big) \
&=(2pi)^{n/2}(2pi)^{n/4}(4/3)^{n/4}.
end{align}

The penultimate equality here holds because both the Euclidean norm and the Lebesgue measure are rotation invariant, whereas the dimension of $U$ is $n/2$; in fact, this is how the Lebesgue measure on $U$ can/should be defined: by the condition that
begin{equation}
int_U du,f(u)=int_{R^{n/2}} dt,f(Tt)
end{equation}

for all nonnegative Borel-measurable functions $fcolon UtoR$, where $TcolonR^{n/2}to U$ is a linear isomorphism.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$











  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Ah, I see. It is as simple as just factoring and completing the square? Thanks for your quick + helpful answers Iosif!
    $endgroup$
    – DJA
    6 hours ago








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @DJA : From my viewpoint, the main thing here is to properly/conveniently define the Lebesgue measure on a linear subspace.
    $endgroup$
    – Iosif Pinelis
    5 hours ago
















4














$begingroup$

$newcommand{R}{mathbb{R}}$
Let $U:={uinR^ncolon u_i=u_{n-i} forall i}$ be your $n/2$-dimensional subspace. I am assuming that your integral is with respect to the product of the Lebesgue measures on $U$ and $R^n$, and I will denote those measures by $du$ and $dv$, respectively. So, if $cdot$ denotes the dot product, your integral is
begin{align}
I&:=int_U du,int_{R^n}dv,expbig(-(|u|^2+ucdot v+|v|^2)/2big) \
&=int_U du,int_{R^n}dv,expbig(-(3|u|^2/4+|v+u/2|^2)/2big) \
&=int_U du,int_{R^n}dw,expbig(-(3|u|^2/4+|w|^2)/2big) \
&=(2pi)^{n/2}int_U du,expbig(-3|u|^2/8big) \
&=(2pi)^{n/2}int_{R^{n/2}} dt,expbig(-3|t|^2/8big) \
&=(2pi)^{n/2}(2pi)^{n/4}(4/3)^{n/4}.
end{align}

The penultimate equality here holds because both the Euclidean norm and the Lebesgue measure are rotation invariant, whereas the dimension of $U$ is $n/2$; in fact, this is how the Lebesgue measure on $U$ can/should be defined: by the condition that
begin{equation}
int_U du,f(u)=int_{R^{n/2}} dt,f(Tt)
end{equation}

for all nonnegative Borel-measurable functions $fcolon UtoR$, where $TcolonR^{n/2}to U$ is a linear isomorphism.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$











  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Ah, I see. It is as simple as just factoring and completing the square? Thanks for your quick + helpful answers Iosif!
    $endgroup$
    – DJA
    6 hours ago








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @DJA : From my viewpoint, the main thing here is to properly/conveniently define the Lebesgue measure on a linear subspace.
    $endgroup$
    – Iosif Pinelis
    5 hours ago














4














4










4







$begingroup$

$newcommand{R}{mathbb{R}}$
Let $U:={uinR^ncolon u_i=u_{n-i} forall i}$ be your $n/2$-dimensional subspace. I am assuming that your integral is with respect to the product of the Lebesgue measures on $U$ and $R^n$, and I will denote those measures by $du$ and $dv$, respectively. So, if $cdot$ denotes the dot product, your integral is
begin{align}
I&:=int_U du,int_{R^n}dv,expbig(-(|u|^2+ucdot v+|v|^2)/2big) \
&=int_U du,int_{R^n}dv,expbig(-(3|u|^2/4+|v+u/2|^2)/2big) \
&=int_U du,int_{R^n}dw,expbig(-(3|u|^2/4+|w|^2)/2big) \
&=(2pi)^{n/2}int_U du,expbig(-3|u|^2/8big) \
&=(2pi)^{n/2}int_{R^{n/2}} dt,expbig(-3|t|^2/8big) \
&=(2pi)^{n/2}(2pi)^{n/4}(4/3)^{n/4}.
end{align}

The penultimate equality here holds because both the Euclidean norm and the Lebesgue measure are rotation invariant, whereas the dimension of $U$ is $n/2$; in fact, this is how the Lebesgue measure on $U$ can/should be defined: by the condition that
begin{equation}
int_U du,f(u)=int_{R^{n/2}} dt,f(Tt)
end{equation}

for all nonnegative Borel-measurable functions $fcolon UtoR$, where $TcolonR^{n/2}to U$ is a linear isomorphism.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$



$newcommand{R}{mathbb{R}}$
Let $U:={uinR^ncolon u_i=u_{n-i} forall i}$ be your $n/2$-dimensional subspace. I am assuming that your integral is with respect to the product of the Lebesgue measures on $U$ and $R^n$, and I will denote those measures by $du$ and $dv$, respectively. So, if $cdot$ denotes the dot product, your integral is
begin{align}
I&:=int_U du,int_{R^n}dv,expbig(-(|u|^2+ucdot v+|v|^2)/2big) \
&=int_U du,int_{R^n}dv,expbig(-(3|u|^2/4+|v+u/2|^2)/2big) \
&=int_U du,int_{R^n}dw,expbig(-(3|u|^2/4+|w|^2)/2big) \
&=(2pi)^{n/2}int_U du,expbig(-3|u|^2/8big) \
&=(2pi)^{n/2}int_{R^{n/2}} dt,expbig(-3|t|^2/8big) \
&=(2pi)^{n/2}(2pi)^{n/4}(4/3)^{n/4}.
end{align}

The penultimate equality here holds because both the Euclidean norm and the Lebesgue measure are rotation invariant, whereas the dimension of $U$ is $n/2$; in fact, this is how the Lebesgue measure on $U$ can/should be defined: by the condition that
begin{equation}
int_U du,f(u)=int_{R^{n/2}} dt,f(Tt)
end{equation}

for all nonnegative Borel-measurable functions $fcolon UtoR$, where $TcolonR^{n/2}to U$ is a linear isomorphism.







share|cite|improve this answer














share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited 7 hours ago

























answered 7 hours ago









Iosif PinelisIosif Pinelis

25.5k3 gold badges30 silver badges69 bronze badges




25.5k3 gold badges30 silver badges69 bronze badges











  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Ah, I see. It is as simple as just factoring and completing the square? Thanks for your quick + helpful answers Iosif!
    $endgroup$
    – DJA
    6 hours ago








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @DJA : From my viewpoint, the main thing here is to properly/conveniently define the Lebesgue measure on a linear subspace.
    $endgroup$
    – Iosif Pinelis
    5 hours ago














  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Ah, I see. It is as simple as just factoring and completing the square? Thanks for your quick + helpful answers Iosif!
    $endgroup$
    – DJA
    6 hours ago








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @DJA : From my viewpoint, the main thing here is to properly/conveniently define the Lebesgue measure on a linear subspace.
    $endgroup$
    – Iosif Pinelis
    5 hours ago








1




1




$begingroup$
Ah, I see. It is as simple as just factoring and completing the square? Thanks for your quick + helpful answers Iosif!
$endgroup$
– DJA
6 hours ago






$begingroup$
Ah, I see. It is as simple as just factoring and completing the square? Thanks for your quick + helpful answers Iosif!
$endgroup$
– DJA
6 hours ago






1




1




$begingroup$
@DJA : From my viewpoint, the main thing here is to properly/conveniently define the Lebesgue measure on a linear subspace.
$endgroup$
– Iosif Pinelis
5 hours ago




$begingroup$
@DJA : From my viewpoint, the main thing here is to properly/conveniently define the Lebesgue measure on a linear subspace.
$endgroup$
– Iosif Pinelis
5 hours ago



















draft saved

draft discarded



















































Thanks for contributing an answer to MathOverflow!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathoverflow.net%2fquestions%2f341666%2fdegenerate-gaussian-integral%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Taj Mahal Inhaltsverzeichnis Aufbau | Geschichte | 350-Jahr-Feier | Heutige Bedeutung | Siehe auch |...

Baia Sprie Cuprins Etimologie | Istorie | Demografie | Politică și administrație | Arii naturale...

Nicolae Petrescu-Găină Cuprins Biografie | Opera | In memoriam | Varia | Controverse, incertitudini...