Good notation to require that z ≠ 0, -1, -2, -3, …What are some good examples for suggestive notation?Why...

Does a large scratch in an ND filter affect image quality?

Ethernet, Wifi and a little human psychology

Calculate the limit without l'Hopital rule

How much would a 1 foot tall human weigh?

Can I include Abandoned Patent in CV?

Are there objective criteria for classifying consonance v. dissonance?

Why is the year in this ISO timestamp not 2019?

A command to output each line forward then backwards

Make 2019 with single digits

Can I travel to European countries with the Irish passport and without destination Visa?

License of project files created with Blender

Does a feasible high thrust high specific impulse engine exist using current non space technology?

What 68-pin connector is this on my 2.5" solid state drive?

Teleport everything in a large zone; or teleport all living things and make a lot of equipment disappear

Why don't airports use arresting gears to recover energy from landing passenger planes?

How can I use expandafter the expand the definition of this control sequence?

How does a simple logistic regression model achieve a 92% classification accuracy on MNIST?

How do we know that black holes are spinning?

Meaning of Swimming their horses

Unable to find solution to 6 simultaneous equations

Can an infinite series be thought of as adding up "infinitely many" terms?

How to control the output voltage of a solid state relay

How clean are pets?

Permutations in Disguise



Good notation to require that z ≠ 0, -1, -2, -3, …


What are some good examples for suggestive notation?Why does the logarithm require a special notation?Good example that enumerating notation of sets is not uniqueGood confusion-avoiding notation for iterated commutators?What is a good notation for an “even falling factorial”?“Good” notation for $hom$-functorsNotation question: Does $inf$ require a subscript?Is Modular Arithmetic Notation Good?






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}







2












$begingroup$


An engineer in my 50s, I have gradually been trying to improve my mathematical notation, an effort your answers here at Math.SE have partly inspired. Therefore, if $z in mathbb C$, may I ask whether I have written this in good style? $$z notin {n | n in mathbb Z wedge n le 0}$$ Or is this better? $$z notin {n in mathbb Z | n le 0}$$ Or is this better? $$z notin {n in mathbb Z le 0}$$ Or even this? $$z notin {mathbb Z le 0}$$ Or this? $$z notinmathbb Z le 0$$ Or something else? If you find a flaw in any or all of my notations (and I do not doubt that you will), then would you illuminate my misconception?



The $z$ is an arbitrary complex number except that $z = 0, -1, -2, -3,ldots$ [the poles of $Gamma(z)$] are not allowed.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$










  • 1




    $begingroup$
    What's wrong with just writing "[$zin mathbb{C}$ with] $znot = 0, -1, -2, dots$"?
    $endgroup$
    – anomaly
    8 hours ago












  • $begingroup$
    @anomaly Only that I did not know that that is an accepted notation.
    $endgroup$
    – thb
    8 hours ago


















2












$begingroup$


An engineer in my 50s, I have gradually been trying to improve my mathematical notation, an effort your answers here at Math.SE have partly inspired. Therefore, if $z in mathbb C$, may I ask whether I have written this in good style? $$z notin {n | n in mathbb Z wedge n le 0}$$ Or is this better? $$z notin {n in mathbb Z | n le 0}$$ Or is this better? $$z notin {n in mathbb Z le 0}$$ Or even this? $$z notin {mathbb Z le 0}$$ Or this? $$z notinmathbb Z le 0$$ Or something else? If you find a flaw in any or all of my notations (and I do not doubt that you will), then would you illuminate my misconception?



The $z$ is an arbitrary complex number except that $z = 0, -1, -2, -3,ldots$ [the poles of $Gamma(z)$] are not allowed.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$










  • 1




    $begingroup$
    What's wrong with just writing "[$zin mathbb{C}$ with] $znot = 0, -1, -2, dots$"?
    $endgroup$
    – anomaly
    8 hours ago












  • $begingroup$
    @anomaly Only that I did not know that that is an accepted notation.
    $endgroup$
    – thb
    8 hours ago














2












2








2


0



$begingroup$


An engineer in my 50s, I have gradually been trying to improve my mathematical notation, an effort your answers here at Math.SE have partly inspired. Therefore, if $z in mathbb C$, may I ask whether I have written this in good style? $$z notin {n | n in mathbb Z wedge n le 0}$$ Or is this better? $$z notin {n in mathbb Z | n le 0}$$ Or is this better? $$z notin {n in mathbb Z le 0}$$ Or even this? $$z notin {mathbb Z le 0}$$ Or this? $$z notinmathbb Z le 0$$ Or something else? If you find a flaw in any or all of my notations (and I do not doubt that you will), then would you illuminate my misconception?



The $z$ is an arbitrary complex number except that $z = 0, -1, -2, -3,ldots$ [the poles of $Gamma(z)$] are not allowed.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




An engineer in my 50s, I have gradually been trying to improve my mathematical notation, an effort your answers here at Math.SE have partly inspired. Therefore, if $z in mathbb C$, may I ask whether I have written this in good style? $$z notin {n | n in mathbb Z wedge n le 0}$$ Or is this better? $$z notin {n in mathbb Z | n le 0}$$ Or is this better? $$z notin {n in mathbb Z le 0}$$ Or even this? $$z notin {mathbb Z le 0}$$ Or this? $$z notinmathbb Z le 0$$ Or something else? If you find a flaw in any or all of my notations (and I do not doubt that you will), then would you illuminate my misconception?



The $z$ is an arbitrary complex number except that $z = 0, -1, -2, -3,ldots$ [the poles of $Gamma(z)$] are not allowed.







soft-question notation






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited 7 hours ago







thb

















asked 8 hours ago









thbthb

2471 silver badge10 bronze badges




2471 silver badge10 bronze badges











  • 1




    $begingroup$
    What's wrong with just writing "[$zin mathbb{C}$ with] $znot = 0, -1, -2, dots$"?
    $endgroup$
    – anomaly
    8 hours ago












  • $begingroup$
    @anomaly Only that I did not know that that is an accepted notation.
    $endgroup$
    – thb
    8 hours ago














  • 1




    $begingroup$
    What's wrong with just writing "[$zin mathbb{C}$ with] $znot = 0, -1, -2, dots$"?
    $endgroup$
    – anomaly
    8 hours ago












  • $begingroup$
    @anomaly Only that I did not know that that is an accepted notation.
    $endgroup$
    – thb
    8 hours ago








1




1




$begingroup$
What's wrong with just writing "[$zin mathbb{C}$ with] $znot = 0, -1, -2, dots$"?
$endgroup$
– anomaly
8 hours ago






$begingroup$
What's wrong with just writing "[$zin mathbb{C}$ with] $znot = 0, -1, -2, dots$"?
$endgroup$
– anomaly
8 hours ago














$begingroup$
@anomaly Only that I did not know that that is an accepted notation.
$endgroup$
– thb
8 hours ago




$begingroup$
@anomaly Only that I did not know that that is an accepted notation.
$endgroup$
– thb
8 hours ago










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















5














$begingroup$

Since $zinmathbb{C}$ we should also provide this information. Complex numbers which are not zero or negative integers are often specified as
begin{align*}
zinmathbb{C}setminus{0,-1,-2,ldots}
end{align*}






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$























    2














    $begingroup$

    Personally, I would say $znotin mathbb{Z}^{leq 0}$.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$











    • 1




      $begingroup$
      I assume that some of my other notations are overelaborate, awkward and/or wrong. If you elaborated, I would be interested.
      $endgroup$
      – thb
      8 hours ago






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      @thb The second one you gave is the only one that I think I would find in a text. $znotin {nin mathbb{Z}mid nleq 0}$, but this assume that the total domain is $mathbb{Z}$. I now realize you might be talking about the complex plane. In which case, you might write it as, $zin mathbb{C}setminus mathbb{Z}^{leq 0} = {zinmathbb{C}| zne n, nin mathbb{Z}^{leq 0}}$.
      $endgroup$
      – Laarz
      8 hours ago








    • 1




      $begingroup$
      Yes, that is my trouble, isn't it? My notation was poor, so you did not know what I was talking about. I am indeed talking about the complex plane. Your answer shows me how to improve my notation.
      $endgroup$
      – thb
      7 hours ago





















    1














    $begingroup$

    I don't like any of these. Too much notation makes questions harder to read, and none of these clarify what $z$ is allowed to be. If $z$ (notice! this is a total guess!) is supposed to be a complex number, I would say, "let $z in mathbb{C}$ be a complex number that is not a non-positive integer."





    Edit: I've just seen that $z$ is supposed to be an integer. In this case we should just write $z in mathbb{N}$. Most authors define the natural numbers $mathbb{N}$ to be the set of positive integers.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$















    • $begingroup$
      Yes, that is how I usually write. Good advice, but today I am explicitly trying to master the formalism. The $z$ is indeed complex: it's the same $z$ that appears in Abramowitz & Stegun.
      $endgroup$
      – thb
      8 hours ago












    • $begingroup$
      I have edited my question to clarify.
      $endgroup$
      – thb
      8 hours ago








    • 1




      $begingroup$
      +1 for minimizing notation. If necessary the OP can clarify that $0 notin mathbb{N}$.
      $endgroup$
      – Ethan Bolker
      6 hours ago














    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/"u003ecc by-sa 4.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });















    draft saved

    draft discarded
















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3356638%2fgood-notation-to-require-that-z-%25e2%2589%25a0-0-1-2-3%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes








    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    5














    $begingroup$

    Since $zinmathbb{C}$ we should also provide this information. Complex numbers which are not zero or negative integers are often specified as
    begin{align*}
    zinmathbb{C}setminus{0,-1,-2,ldots}
    end{align*}






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$




















      5














      $begingroup$

      Since $zinmathbb{C}$ we should also provide this information. Complex numbers which are not zero or negative integers are often specified as
      begin{align*}
      zinmathbb{C}setminus{0,-1,-2,ldots}
      end{align*}






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$


















        5














        5










        5







        $begingroup$

        Since $zinmathbb{C}$ we should also provide this information. Complex numbers which are not zero or negative integers are often specified as
        begin{align*}
        zinmathbb{C}setminus{0,-1,-2,ldots}
        end{align*}






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        Since $zinmathbb{C}$ we should also provide this information. Complex numbers which are not zero or negative integers are often specified as
        begin{align*}
        zinmathbb{C}setminus{0,-1,-2,ldots}
        end{align*}







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered 6 hours ago









        Markus ScheuerMarkus Scheuer

        68.5k4 gold badges65 silver badges164 bronze badges




        68.5k4 gold badges65 silver badges164 bronze badges




























            2














            $begingroup$

            Personally, I would say $znotin mathbb{Z}^{leq 0}$.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$











            • 1




              $begingroup$
              I assume that some of my other notations are overelaborate, awkward and/or wrong. If you elaborated, I would be interested.
              $endgroup$
              – thb
              8 hours ago






            • 1




              $begingroup$
              @thb The second one you gave is the only one that I think I would find in a text. $znotin {nin mathbb{Z}mid nleq 0}$, but this assume that the total domain is $mathbb{Z}$. I now realize you might be talking about the complex plane. In which case, you might write it as, $zin mathbb{C}setminus mathbb{Z}^{leq 0} = {zinmathbb{C}| zne n, nin mathbb{Z}^{leq 0}}$.
              $endgroup$
              – Laarz
              8 hours ago








            • 1




              $begingroup$
              Yes, that is my trouble, isn't it? My notation was poor, so you did not know what I was talking about. I am indeed talking about the complex plane. Your answer shows me how to improve my notation.
              $endgroup$
              – thb
              7 hours ago


















            2














            $begingroup$

            Personally, I would say $znotin mathbb{Z}^{leq 0}$.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$











            • 1




              $begingroup$
              I assume that some of my other notations are overelaborate, awkward and/or wrong. If you elaborated, I would be interested.
              $endgroup$
              – thb
              8 hours ago






            • 1




              $begingroup$
              @thb The second one you gave is the only one that I think I would find in a text. $znotin {nin mathbb{Z}mid nleq 0}$, but this assume that the total domain is $mathbb{Z}$. I now realize you might be talking about the complex plane. In which case, you might write it as, $zin mathbb{C}setminus mathbb{Z}^{leq 0} = {zinmathbb{C}| zne n, nin mathbb{Z}^{leq 0}}$.
              $endgroup$
              – Laarz
              8 hours ago








            • 1




              $begingroup$
              Yes, that is my trouble, isn't it? My notation was poor, so you did not know what I was talking about. I am indeed talking about the complex plane. Your answer shows me how to improve my notation.
              $endgroup$
              – thb
              7 hours ago
















            2














            2










            2







            $begingroup$

            Personally, I would say $znotin mathbb{Z}^{leq 0}$.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$



            Personally, I would say $znotin mathbb{Z}^{leq 0}$.







            share|cite|improve this answer












            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer










            answered 8 hours ago









            LaarzLaarz

            4212 silver badges11 bronze badges




            4212 silver badges11 bronze badges











            • 1




              $begingroup$
              I assume that some of my other notations are overelaborate, awkward and/or wrong. If you elaborated, I would be interested.
              $endgroup$
              – thb
              8 hours ago






            • 1




              $begingroup$
              @thb The second one you gave is the only one that I think I would find in a text. $znotin {nin mathbb{Z}mid nleq 0}$, but this assume that the total domain is $mathbb{Z}$. I now realize you might be talking about the complex plane. In which case, you might write it as, $zin mathbb{C}setminus mathbb{Z}^{leq 0} = {zinmathbb{C}| zne n, nin mathbb{Z}^{leq 0}}$.
              $endgroup$
              – Laarz
              8 hours ago








            • 1




              $begingroup$
              Yes, that is my trouble, isn't it? My notation was poor, so you did not know what I was talking about. I am indeed talking about the complex plane. Your answer shows me how to improve my notation.
              $endgroup$
              – thb
              7 hours ago
















            • 1




              $begingroup$
              I assume that some of my other notations are overelaborate, awkward and/or wrong. If you elaborated, I would be interested.
              $endgroup$
              – thb
              8 hours ago






            • 1




              $begingroup$
              @thb The second one you gave is the only one that I think I would find in a text. $znotin {nin mathbb{Z}mid nleq 0}$, but this assume that the total domain is $mathbb{Z}$. I now realize you might be talking about the complex plane. In which case, you might write it as, $zin mathbb{C}setminus mathbb{Z}^{leq 0} = {zinmathbb{C}| zne n, nin mathbb{Z}^{leq 0}}$.
              $endgroup$
              – Laarz
              8 hours ago








            • 1




              $begingroup$
              Yes, that is my trouble, isn't it? My notation was poor, so you did not know what I was talking about. I am indeed talking about the complex plane. Your answer shows me how to improve my notation.
              $endgroup$
              – thb
              7 hours ago










            1




            1




            $begingroup$
            I assume that some of my other notations are overelaborate, awkward and/or wrong. If you elaborated, I would be interested.
            $endgroup$
            – thb
            8 hours ago




            $begingroup$
            I assume that some of my other notations are overelaborate, awkward and/or wrong. If you elaborated, I would be interested.
            $endgroup$
            – thb
            8 hours ago




            1




            1




            $begingroup$
            @thb The second one you gave is the only one that I think I would find in a text. $znotin {nin mathbb{Z}mid nleq 0}$, but this assume that the total domain is $mathbb{Z}$. I now realize you might be talking about the complex plane. In which case, you might write it as, $zin mathbb{C}setminus mathbb{Z}^{leq 0} = {zinmathbb{C}| zne n, nin mathbb{Z}^{leq 0}}$.
            $endgroup$
            – Laarz
            8 hours ago






            $begingroup$
            @thb The second one you gave is the only one that I think I would find in a text. $znotin {nin mathbb{Z}mid nleq 0}$, but this assume that the total domain is $mathbb{Z}$. I now realize you might be talking about the complex plane. In which case, you might write it as, $zin mathbb{C}setminus mathbb{Z}^{leq 0} = {zinmathbb{C}| zne n, nin mathbb{Z}^{leq 0}}$.
            $endgroup$
            – Laarz
            8 hours ago






            1




            1




            $begingroup$
            Yes, that is my trouble, isn't it? My notation was poor, so you did not know what I was talking about. I am indeed talking about the complex plane. Your answer shows me how to improve my notation.
            $endgroup$
            – thb
            7 hours ago






            $begingroup$
            Yes, that is my trouble, isn't it? My notation was poor, so you did not know what I was talking about. I am indeed talking about the complex plane. Your answer shows me how to improve my notation.
            $endgroup$
            – thb
            7 hours ago













            1














            $begingroup$

            I don't like any of these. Too much notation makes questions harder to read, and none of these clarify what $z$ is allowed to be. If $z$ (notice! this is a total guess!) is supposed to be a complex number, I would say, "let $z in mathbb{C}$ be a complex number that is not a non-positive integer."





            Edit: I've just seen that $z$ is supposed to be an integer. In this case we should just write $z in mathbb{N}$. Most authors define the natural numbers $mathbb{N}$ to be the set of positive integers.






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$















            • $begingroup$
              Yes, that is how I usually write. Good advice, but today I am explicitly trying to master the formalism. The $z$ is indeed complex: it's the same $z$ that appears in Abramowitz & Stegun.
              $endgroup$
              – thb
              8 hours ago












            • $begingroup$
              I have edited my question to clarify.
              $endgroup$
              – thb
              8 hours ago








            • 1




              $begingroup$
              +1 for minimizing notation. If necessary the OP can clarify that $0 notin mathbb{N}$.
              $endgroup$
              – Ethan Bolker
              6 hours ago
















            1














            $begingroup$

            I don't like any of these. Too much notation makes questions harder to read, and none of these clarify what $z$ is allowed to be. If $z$ (notice! this is a total guess!) is supposed to be a complex number, I would say, "let $z in mathbb{C}$ be a complex number that is not a non-positive integer."





            Edit: I've just seen that $z$ is supposed to be an integer. In this case we should just write $z in mathbb{N}$. Most authors define the natural numbers $mathbb{N}$ to be the set of positive integers.






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$















            • $begingroup$
              Yes, that is how I usually write. Good advice, but today I am explicitly trying to master the formalism. The $z$ is indeed complex: it's the same $z$ that appears in Abramowitz & Stegun.
              $endgroup$
              – thb
              8 hours ago












            • $begingroup$
              I have edited my question to clarify.
              $endgroup$
              – thb
              8 hours ago








            • 1




              $begingroup$
              +1 for minimizing notation. If necessary the OP can clarify that $0 notin mathbb{N}$.
              $endgroup$
              – Ethan Bolker
              6 hours ago














            1














            1










            1







            $begingroup$

            I don't like any of these. Too much notation makes questions harder to read, and none of these clarify what $z$ is allowed to be. If $z$ (notice! this is a total guess!) is supposed to be a complex number, I would say, "let $z in mathbb{C}$ be a complex number that is not a non-positive integer."





            Edit: I've just seen that $z$ is supposed to be an integer. In this case we should just write $z in mathbb{N}$. Most authors define the natural numbers $mathbb{N}$ to be the set of positive integers.






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$



            I don't like any of these. Too much notation makes questions harder to read, and none of these clarify what $z$ is allowed to be. If $z$ (notice! this is a total guess!) is supposed to be a complex number, I would say, "let $z in mathbb{C}$ be a complex number that is not a non-positive integer."





            Edit: I've just seen that $z$ is supposed to be an integer. In this case we should just write $z in mathbb{N}$. Most authors define the natural numbers $mathbb{N}$ to be the set of positive integers.







            share|cite|improve this answer














            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer








            edited 8 hours ago

























            answered 8 hours ago









            Rylee LymanRylee Lyman

            2,2443 silver badges20 bronze badges




            2,2443 silver badges20 bronze badges















            • $begingroup$
              Yes, that is how I usually write. Good advice, but today I am explicitly trying to master the formalism. The $z$ is indeed complex: it's the same $z$ that appears in Abramowitz & Stegun.
              $endgroup$
              – thb
              8 hours ago












            • $begingroup$
              I have edited my question to clarify.
              $endgroup$
              – thb
              8 hours ago








            • 1




              $begingroup$
              +1 for minimizing notation. If necessary the OP can clarify that $0 notin mathbb{N}$.
              $endgroup$
              – Ethan Bolker
              6 hours ago


















            • $begingroup$
              Yes, that is how I usually write. Good advice, but today I am explicitly trying to master the formalism. The $z$ is indeed complex: it's the same $z$ that appears in Abramowitz & Stegun.
              $endgroup$
              – thb
              8 hours ago












            • $begingroup$
              I have edited my question to clarify.
              $endgroup$
              – thb
              8 hours ago








            • 1




              $begingroup$
              +1 for minimizing notation. If necessary the OP can clarify that $0 notin mathbb{N}$.
              $endgroup$
              – Ethan Bolker
              6 hours ago
















            $begingroup$
            Yes, that is how I usually write. Good advice, but today I am explicitly trying to master the formalism. The $z$ is indeed complex: it's the same $z$ that appears in Abramowitz & Stegun.
            $endgroup$
            – thb
            8 hours ago






            $begingroup$
            Yes, that is how I usually write. Good advice, but today I am explicitly trying to master the formalism. The $z$ is indeed complex: it's the same $z$ that appears in Abramowitz & Stegun.
            $endgroup$
            – thb
            8 hours ago














            $begingroup$
            I have edited my question to clarify.
            $endgroup$
            – thb
            8 hours ago






            $begingroup$
            I have edited my question to clarify.
            $endgroup$
            – thb
            8 hours ago






            1




            1




            $begingroup$
            +1 for minimizing notation. If necessary the OP can clarify that $0 notin mathbb{N}$.
            $endgroup$
            – Ethan Bolker
            6 hours ago




            $begingroup$
            +1 for minimizing notation. If necessary the OP can clarify that $0 notin mathbb{N}$.
            $endgroup$
            – Ethan Bolker
            6 hours ago



















            draft saved

            draft discarded



















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3356638%2fgood-notation-to-require-that-z-%25e2%2589%25a0-0-1-2-3%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Taj Mahal Inhaltsverzeichnis Aufbau | Geschichte | 350-Jahr-Feier | Heutige Bedeutung | Siehe auch |...

            Baia Sprie Cuprins Etimologie | Istorie | Demografie | Politică și administrație | Arii naturale...

            Nicolae Petrescu-Găină Cuprins Biografie | Opera | In memoriam | Varia | Controverse, incertitudini...