Why Should I Care That Fully Meshed Peering Leads to Exponential Growth of Total Connections?
IEEE 754 square root with Newton-Raphson
Is there a way to remove Smite from a weapon?
Confusion regarding control system of Mars Rover?
Could the Queen overturn the UK Supreme Court ruling regarding prorogation of Parliament?
PhD Length: are shorter PhD degrees (from different countries) valued differently in other counter countries where PhD Is a longer process?
Shell Sort, Insertion Sort, Bubble Sort, Selection Sort Algorithms (Python)
Short story about a potato hotel that makes its guests into potatoes throughout the night
How can Germany increase investments in Russia while EU economic sanctions against Russia are still in place?
As a team leader is it appropriate to bring in fundraiser candy?
SOQL injection vulnerability issue
Why Should I Care That Fully Meshed Peering Leads to Exponential Growth of Total Connections?
French license plates
What action is recommended if your accommodation refuses to let you leave without paying additional fees?
Is "weekend warrior" derogatory?
Would a horse be sufficient buffer to prevent injury when falling from a great height?
Re-entering the UK after overstaying in 2008
How do we decide/plan an SLA for an NP-hard optimization process running in production?
Realistically, how much do you need to start investing?
Everyone Gets a Window Seat
Looking for circuit board material that can be dissolved
Would an object shot from earth fall into the sun?
Replace Only First Occurence after Pattern
Should I be an author on another PhD student's paper if I went to their meetings and gave advice?
Missing quartile in boxplot
Why Should I Care That Fully Meshed Peering Leads to Exponential Growth of Total Connections?
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{
margin-bottom:0;
}
It seems that when I see a description of a fully-meshed peering system, the exponential growth of peer connections is often referred to as a negative.
However, some mentions of this were specifically towards fully meshed peering in an AWS VPC specifically.
Surely, if connections between peers is done entirely automatically, and the amount of connections for any individual VPC increases linearly, then this shouldn't be an issue?
cloud
New contributor
add a comment
|
It seems that when I see a description of a fully-meshed peering system, the exponential growth of peer connections is often referred to as a negative.
However, some mentions of this were specifically towards fully meshed peering in an AWS VPC specifically.
Surely, if connections between peers is done entirely automatically, and the amount of connections for any individual VPC increases linearly, then this shouldn't be an issue?
cloud
New contributor
Do you have a specific problem?
– Zac67
8 hours ago
@Zac67 I am considering using a fully meshed set of VPCs for a specific project I'm working on, and I'm not sure why having a large amount of connections is bad per se, when everything can be scaled automatically. (Sorry if I'm using incorrect terminology, I'm not a networking guy).
– RecyclingBen
7 hours ago
add a comment
|
It seems that when I see a description of a fully-meshed peering system, the exponential growth of peer connections is often referred to as a negative.
However, some mentions of this were specifically towards fully meshed peering in an AWS VPC specifically.
Surely, if connections between peers is done entirely automatically, and the amount of connections for any individual VPC increases linearly, then this shouldn't be an issue?
cloud
New contributor
It seems that when I see a description of a fully-meshed peering system, the exponential growth of peer connections is often referred to as a negative.
However, some mentions of this were specifically towards fully meshed peering in an AWS VPC specifically.
Surely, if connections between peers is done entirely automatically, and the amount of connections for any individual VPC increases linearly, then this shouldn't be an issue?
cloud
cloud
New contributor
New contributor
New contributor
asked 8 hours ago
RecyclingBenRecyclingBen
182 bronze badges
182 bronze badges
New contributor
New contributor
Do you have a specific problem?
– Zac67
8 hours ago
@Zac67 I am considering using a fully meshed set of VPCs for a specific project I'm working on, and I'm not sure why having a large amount of connections is bad per se, when everything can be scaled automatically. (Sorry if I'm using incorrect terminology, I'm not a networking guy).
– RecyclingBen
7 hours ago
add a comment
|
Do you have a specific problem?
– Zac67
8 hours ago
@Zac67 I am considering using a fully meshed set of VPCs for a specific project I'm working on, and I'm not sure why having a large amount of connections is bad per se, when everything can be scaled automatically. (Sorry if I'm using incorrect terminology, I'm not a networking guy).
– RecyclingBen
7 hours ago
Do you have a specific problem?
– Zac67
8 hours ago
Do you have a specific problem?
– Zac67
8 hours ago
@Zac67 I am considering using a fully meshed set of VPCs for a specific project I'm working on, and I'm not sure why having a large amount of connections is bad per se, when everything can be scaled automatically. (Sorry if I'm using incorrect terminology, I'm not a networking guy).
– RecyclingBen
7 hours ago
@Zac67 I am considering using a fully meshed set of VPCs for a specific project I'm working on, and I'm not sure why having a large amount of connections is bad per se, when everything can be scaled automatically. (Sorry if I'm using incorrect terminology, I'm not a networking guy).
– RecyclingBen
7 hours ago
add a comment
|
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
By exponentially increasing the the number of connections, you also exponentially increase the amount of control traffic, and you could end up with the control traffic using most or all of the available bandwidth of the system.
Some protocols will have mitigations for this behavior. For example, OSPF uses the DR/BDR to break the exponential number of connections, and iBGP can use route reflectors or confederations to do something similar.
add a comment
|
In addition to Ron’s point about the amount of control traffic: The additional cpu load resulting from processing route updates on every router often isn’t worth it either when your network grows. You don’t want every router in your network to do that, that’s where for example route reflectors come in. Having many routers processing route updates can lead to nasty routing inconsistencies if not all routers process updates equally fast.
add a comment
|
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "496"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/"u003ecc by-sa 4.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
RecyclingBen is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fnetworkengineering.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f62692%2fwhy-should-i-care-that-fully-meshed-peering-leads-to-exponential-growth-of-total%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
By exponentially increasing the the number of connections, you also exponentially increase the amount of control traffic, and you could end up with the control traffic using most or all of the available bandwidth of the system.
Some protocols will have mitigations for this behavior. For example, OSPF uses the DR/BDR to break the exponential number of connections, and iBGP can use route reflectors or confederations to do something similar.
add a comment
|
By exponentially increasing the the number of connections, you also exponentially increase the amount of control traffic, and you could end up with the control traffic using most or all of the available bandwidth of the system.
Some protocols will have mitigations for this behavior. For example, OSPF uses the DR/BDR to break the exponential number of connections, and iBGP can use route reflectors or confederations to do something similar.
add a comment
|
By exponentially increasing the the number of connections, you also exponentially increase the amount of control traffic, and you could end up with the control traffic using most or all of the available bandwidth of the system.
Some protocols will have mitigations for this behavior. For example, OSPF uses the DR/BDR to break the exponential number of connections, and iBGP can use route reflectors or confederations to do something similar.
By exponentially increasing the the number of connections, you also exponentially increase the amount of control traffic, and you could end up with the control traffic using most or all of the available bandwidth of the system.
Some protocols will have mitigations for this behavior. For example, OSPF uses the DR/BDR to break the exponential number of connections, and iBGP can use route reflectors or confederations to do something similar.
answered 8 hours ago
Ron Maupin♦Ron Maupin
73.3k14 gold badges75 silver badges136 bronze badges
73.3k14 gold badges75 silver badges136 bronze badges
add a comment
|
add a comment
|
In addition to Ron’s point about the amount of control traffic: The additional cpu load resulting from processing route updates on every router often isn’t worth it either when your network grows. You don’t want every router in your network to do that, that’s where for example route reflectors come in. Having many routers processing route updates can lead to nasty routing inconsistencies if not all routers process updates equally fast.
add a comment
|
In addition to Ron’s point about the amount of control traffic: The additional cpu load resulting from processing route updates on every router often isn’t worth it either when your network grows. You don’t want every router in your network to do that, that’s where for example route reflectors come in. Having many routers processing route updates can lead to nasty routing inconsistencies if not all routers process updates equally fast.
add a comment
|
In addition to Ron’s point about the amount of control traffic: The additional cpu load resulting from processing route updates on every router often isn’t worth it either when your network grows. You don’t want every router in your network to do that, that’s where for example route reflectors come in. Having many routers processing route updates can lead to nasty routing inconsistencies if not all routers process updates equally fast.
In addition to Ron’s point about the amount of control traffic: The additional cpu load resulting from processing route updates on every router often isn’t worth it either when your network grows. You don’t want every router in your network to do that, that’s where for example route reflectors come in. Having many routers processing route updates can lead to nasty routing inconsistencies if not all routers process updates equally fast.
answered 6 hours ago
Teun Vink♦Teun Vink
12.7k5 gold badges35 silver badges58 bronze badges
12.7k5 gold badges35 silver badges58 bronze badges
add a comment
|
add a comment
|
RecyclingBen is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
RecyclingBen is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
RecyclingBen is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
RecyclingBen is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Network Engineering Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fnetworkengineering.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f62692%2fwhy-should-i-care-that-fully-meshed-peering-leads-to-exponential-growth-of-total%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Do you have a specific problem?
– Zac67
8 hours ago
@Zac67 I am considering using a fully meshed set of VPCs for a specific project I'm working on, and I'm not sure why having a large amount of connections is bad per se, when everything can be scaled automatically. (Sorry if I'm using incorrect terminology, I'm not a networking guy).
– RecyclingBen
7 hours ago