Rationalism and Catholicism / ProtestantismDescartes and MontaigneWhat does Bachelard mean by “Applied...

Did smallpox emerge in 1580?

How can a "proper" function have a vertical slope?

How can my hammerspace safely "decompress"?

When was “sf” first used to describe science fiction?

If the music alphabet had more than 7 letters would octaves still sound like the same note?

Would a physician with migraine better treat their patients?

What does "drop" mean in this context?

d-Menthol vs dl-menthol: Does an enantiomer and its racemic mixture have different melting points?

How much income am I getting by renting my house?

Doubling in dominant seventh

Is Having my Players Control Two Parties a Good Idea?

Why does English employ double possessive pronouns such as theirs and ours?

Is it true that if we start a sentence with 'the', this 'the' can be omitted?

Do you say "good game" after a game in which your opponent played poorly?

Can detect magic sense magic items inside a bag of holding?

"Shake your head all you like" meaning

Can digital computers understand infinity?

Are There 3D Rules for Flying and Distance?

algebra permutations

How can demon technology be prevented from surpassing humans?

Island of Knights, Knaves, Spies

Why does 1.1.1.1 not resolve archive.is?

How to protect my Wi-Fi password from being displayed by Android phones when sharing it with QR code?

How to make a PCB based on ATtiny easily updatable by end users?



Rationalism and Catholicism / Protestantism


Descartes and MontaigneWhat does Bachelard mean by “Applied Rationalism”?What is critical rationalism?Who was Descartes trying to refute when he came up with his cogito?Descartes and existenceWhich works of Plato and Aristotle (Ancient Greek if there is more worth it) should I read to get a context to study Continental Rationalism?The philosophical relationship of morality, rationalism, atheism and physicalismWhich of Descartes’ arguments for the existence of God is the most successful and why?






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{
margin-bottom:0;
}
.everyonelovesstackoverflow{position:absolute;height:1px;width:1px;opacity:0;top:0;left:0;pointer-events:none;}








1

















How much more “incompatible” was rationalism with Catholicism compared to Protestant christianity?



Of course everyone learned in high school that the enlightenment was in direct opposition to Catholic dogma. In the 18th century it relentlessly attacked and ridiculed the Catholic Church, we all know enough examples – so this question may sound a bit naive.



The difference to me seems:



Rationalism has always been




  • completely incompatible with Catholicism

  • an important part of Protestant thought


But… the curious thing is: it starts right with the early enlightenment, with someone as as careful as the Catholic Descartes (when it comes to faith, he sounds more like a spokesman for the Middle Ages). His works ended upon the Index (stayed there till its abolition in the 20th century) and were also banned by royal decree… while Leibniz was revered in Protestantism.



I wonder if I overstate things?



Were there any instances in history were rationalism was tolerated by the Catholic Church? Did any other rationalist philosopher after Descartes make an attempt to reconcile his philosophy with Catholic faith?



Or were there were major conflicts between Protestant authorities and a Protestant rationalist (like Descartes vs. the Catholic Church)?










share|improve this question





























  • Which 'Protestant authorities' are you referring to specifically? There is a wide gamut of authorities in Protestantism. the rationalism of the Renaissance, the start of the age of modernity, is not the same rationalism of Protestant thought. You are conflating the word rationalism used in two different contexts. The rationalism of the Renaissance rejected the 'deus ex machina' and looked for causes within the thing itself. Although the Protestant reformation occurred in and around the same time period, it is in no way related to the Renaissance,

    – Swami Vishwananda
    3 hours ago


















1

















How much more “incompatible” was rationalism with Catholicism compared to Protestant christianity?



Of course everyone learned in high school that the enlightenment was in direct opposition to Catholic dogma. In the 18th century it relentlessly attacked and ridiculed the Catholic Church, we all know enough examples – so this question may sound a bit naive.



The difference to me seems:



Rationalism has always been




  • completely incompatible with Catholicism

  • an important part of Protestant thought


But… the curious thing is: it starts right with the early enlightenment, with someone as as careful as the Catholic Descartes (when it comes to faith, he sounds more like a spokesman for the Middle Ages). His works ended upon the Index (stayed there till its abolition in the 20th century) and were also banned by royal decree… while Leibniz was revered in Protestantism.



I wonder if I overstate things?



Were there any instances in history were rationalism was tolerated by the Catholic Church? Did any other rationalist philosopher after Descartes make an attempt to reconcile his philosophy with Catholic faith?



Or were there were major conflicts between Protestant authorities and a Protestant rationalist (like Descartes vs. the Catholic Church)?










share|improve this question





























  • Which 'Protestant authorities' are you referring to specifically? There is a wide gamut of authorities in Protestantism. the rationalism of the Renaissance, the start of the age of modernity, is not the same rationalism of Protestant thought. You are conflating the word rationalism used in two different contexts. The rationalism of the Renaissance rejected the 'deus ex machina' and looked for causes within the thing itself. Although the Protestant reformation occurred in and around the same time period, it is in no way related to the Renaissance,

    – Swami Vishwananda
    3 hours ago














1












1








1








How much more “incompatible” was rationalism with Catholicism compared to Protestant christianity?



Of course everyone learned in high school that the enlightenment was in direct opposition to Catholic dogma. In the 18th century it relentlessly attacked and ridiculed the Catholic Church, we all know enough examples – so this question may sound a bit naive.



The difference to me seems:



Rationalism has always been




  • completely incompatible with Catholicism

  • an important part of Protestant thought


But… the curious thing is: it starts right with the early enlightenment, with someone as as careful as the Catholic Descartes (when it comes to faith, he sounds more like a spokesman for the Middle Ages). His works ended upon the Index (stayed there till its abolition in the 20th century) and were also banned by royal decree… while Leibniz was revered in Protestantism.



I wonder if I overstate things?



Were there any instances in history were rationalism was tolerated by the Catholic Church? Did any other rationalist philosopher after Descartes make an attempt to reconcile his philosophy with Catholic faith?



Or were there were major conflicts between Protestant authorities and a Protestant rationalist (like Descartes vs. the Catholic Church)?










share|improve this question
















How much more “incompatible” was rationalism with Catholicism compared to Protestant christianity?



Of course everyone learned in high school that the enlightenment was in direct opposition to Catholic dogma. In the 18th century it relentlessly attacked and ridiculed the Catholic Church, we all know enough examples – so this question may sound a bit naive.



The difference to me seems:



Rationalism has always been




  • completely incompatible with Catholicism

  • an important part of Protestant thought


But… the curious thing is: it starts right with the early enlightenment, with someone as as careful as the Catholic Descartes (when it comes to faith, he sounds more like a spokesman for the Middle Ages). His works ended upon the Index (stayed there till its abolition in the 20th century) and were also banned by royal decree… while Leibniz was revered in Protestantism.



I wonder if I overstate things?



Were there any instances in history were rationalism was tolerated by the Catholic Church? Did any other rationalist philosopher after Descartes make an attempt to reconcile his philosophy with Catholic faith?



Or were there were major conflicts between Protestant authorities and a Protestant rationalist (like Descartes vs. the Catholic Church)?







history-of-philosophy descartes rationalism enlightenment






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question



share|improve this question








edited 8 hours ago









Frank Hubeny

16.6k6 gold badges19 silver badges72 bronze badges




16.6k6 gold badges19 silver badges72 bronze badges










asked 9 hours ago









wolf-revo-catswolf-revo-cats

1,9848 silver badges39 bronze badges




1,9848 silver badges39 bronze badges
















  • Which 'Protestant authorities' are you referring to specifically? There is a wide gamut of authorities in Protestantism. the rationalism of the Renaissance, the start of the age of modernity, is not the same rationalism of Protestant thought. You are conflating the word rationalism used in two different contexts. The rationalism of the Renaissance rejected the 'deus ex machina' and looked for causes within the thing itself. Although the Protestant reformation occurred in and around the same time period, it is in no way related to the Renaissance,

    – Swami Vishwananda
    3 hours ago



















  • Which 'Protestant authorities' are you referring to specifically? There is a wide gamut of authorities in Protestantism. the rationalism of the Renaissance, the start of the age of modernity, is not the same rationalism of Protestant thought. You are conflating the word rationalism used in two different contexts. The rationalism of the Renaissance rejected the 'deus ex machina' and looked for causes within the thing itself. Although the Protestant reformation occurred in and around the same time period, it is in no way related to the Renaissance,

    – Swami Vishwananda
    3 hours ago

















Which 'Protestant authorities' are you referring to specifically? There is a wide gamut of authorities in Protestantism. the rationalism of the Renaissance, the start of the age of modernity, is not the same rationalism of Protestant thought. You are conflating the word rationalism used in two different contexts. The rationalism of the Renaissance rejected the 'deus ex machina' and looked for causes within the thing itself. Although the Protestant reformation occurred in and around the same time period, it is in no way related to the Renaissance,

– Swami Vishwananda
3 hours ago





Which 'Protestant authorities' are you referring to specifically? There is a wide gamut of authorities in Protestantism. the rationalism of the Renaissance, the start of the age of modernity, is not the same rationalism of Protestant thought. You are conflating the word rationalism used in two different contexts. The rationalism of the Renaissance rejected the 'deus ex machina' and looked for causes within the thing itself. Although the Protestant reformation occurred in and around the same time period, it is in no way related to the Renaissance,

– Swami Vishwananda
3 hours ago










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















3


















To suggest a different perspective, Whitehead writes the following: (page 8-9)




The Reformation and the scientific movement were two aspects of the historical revolt which was the dominant intellectual movement of the later Renaissance. The appeal to the origins of Christianity, and Francis Bacon's appeal to efficient causes as against final causes, were two sides of one movement of thought....



....It is a great mistake to conceive this historical revolt as an appeal to reason. On the contrary, it was through and through an anti-intellectualist movement. It was the return to the contemplation of brute fact; and it was based on a recoil from the inflexible rationality of medieval thought.




Protestantism could be viewed as a rejection of the rationalism of Catholicism desiring to go back to the origins of Christianity for the brute facts in the Bible rather than relying on Scholastic or Catholic authority.



Regarding Descartes, Wikipedia offers a hint as to why he may have had trouble with Catholic authorities:




In shifting the debate from "what is true" to "of what can I be certain?," Descartes arguably shifted the authoritative guarantor of truth from God to humanity (even though Descartes himself claimed he received his visions from God)—while the traditional concept of "truth" implies an external authority, "certainty" instead relies on the judgment of the individual.




If that best describes the events then rationalism (and the external authority grounded on it) characterized Catholicism while the Protestant revolt modeled itself more on a scientific pursuit through individual judgment of the brute facts each believer found in the Bible.





Whitehead, A. N. Science and the Modern World. Retrieved from Internet Archive on October 5, 2019 at https://archive.org/details/alfrednorthwhiteheadscienceandthemodernworld1997/page/n19



Wikipedia contributors. (2019, October 5). René Descartes. In Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. Retrieved 19:33, October 5, 2019, from https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ren%C3%A9_Descartes&oldid=919735446






share|improve this answer






























    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "265"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/"u003ecc by-sa 4.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });















    draft saved

    draft discarded
















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphilosophy.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f67545%2frationalism-and-catholicism-protestantism%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown


























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    3


















    To suggest a different perspective, Whitehead writes the following: (page 8-9)




    The Reformation and the scientific movement were two aspects of the historical revolt which was the dominant intellectual movement of the later Renaissance. The appeal to the origins of Christianity, and Francis Bacon's appeal to efficient causes as against final causes, were two sides of one movement of thought....



    ....It is a great mistake to conceive this historical revolt as an appeal to reason. On the contrary, it was through and through an anti-intellectualist movement. It was the return to the contemplation of brute fact; and it was based on a recoil from the inflexible rationality of medieval thought.




    Protestantism could be viewed as a rejection of the rationalism of Catholicism desiring to go back to the origins of Christianity for the brute facts in the Bible rather than relying on Scholastic or Catholic authority.



    Regarding Descartes, Wikipedia offers a hint as to why he may have had trouble with Catholic authorities:




    In shifting the debate from "what is true" to "of what can I be certain?," Descartes arguably shifted the authoritative guarantor of truth from God to humanity (even though Descartes himself claimed he received his visions from God)—while the traditional concept of "truth" implies an external authority, "certainty" instead relies on the judgment of the individual.




    If that best describes the events then rationalism (and the external authority grounded on it) characterized Catholicism while the Protestant revolt modeled itself more on a scientific pursuit through individual judgment of the brute facts each believer found in the Bible.





    Whitehead, A. N. Science and the Modern World. Retrieved from Internet Archive on October 5, 2019 at https://archive.org/details/alfrednorthwhiteheadscienceandthemodernworld1997/page/n19



    Wikipedia contributors. (2019, October 5). René Descartes. In Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. Retrieved 19:33, October 5, 2019, from https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ren%C3%A9_Descartes&oldid=919735446






    share|improve this answer

































      3


















      To suggest a different perspective, Whitehead writes the following: (page 8-9)




      The Reformation and the scientific movement were two aspects of the historical revolt which was the dominant intellectual movement of the later Renaissance. The appeal to the origins of Christianity, and Francis Bacon's appeal to efficient causes as against final causes, were two sides of one movement of thought....



      ....It is a great mistake to conceive this historical revolt as an appeal to reason. On the contrary, it was through and through an anti-intellectualist movement. It was the return to the contemplation of brute fact; and it was based on a recoil from the inflexible rationality of medieval thought.




      Protestantism could be viewed as a rejection of the rationalism of Catholicism desiring to go back to the origins of Christianity for the brute facts in the Bible rather than relying on Scholastic or Catholic authority.



      Regarding Descartes, Wikipedia offers a hint as to why he may have had trouble with Catholic authorities:




      In shifting the debate from "what is true" to "of what can I be certain?," Descartes arguably shifted the authoritative guarantor of truth from God to humanity (even though Descartes himself claimed he received his visions from God)—while the traditional concept of "truth" implies an external authority, "certainty" instead relies on the judgment of the individual.




      If that best describes the events then rationalism (and the external authority grounded on it) characterized Catholicism while the Protestant revolt modeled itself more on a scientific pursuit through individual judgment of the brute facts each believer found in the Bible.





      Whitehead, A. N. Science and the Modern World. Retrieved from Internet Archive on October 5, 2019 at https://archive.org/details/alfrednorthwhiteheadscienceandthemodernworld1997/page/n19



      Wikipedia contributors. (2019, October 5). René Descartes. In Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. Retrieved 19:33, October 5, 2019, from https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ren%C3%A9_Descartes&oldid=919735446






      share|improve this answer































        3














        3










        3









        To suggest a different perspective, Whitehead writes the following: (page 8-9)




        The Reformation and the scientific movement were two aspects of the historical revolt which was the dominant intellectual movement of the later Renaissance. The appeal to the origins of Christianity, and Francis Bacon's appeal to efficient causes as against final causes, were two sides of one movement of thought....



        ....It is a great mistake to conceive this historical revolt as an appeal to reason. On the contrary, it was through and through an anti-intellectualist movement. It was the return to the contemplation of brute fact; and it was based on a recoil from the inflexible rationality of medieval thought.




        Protestantism could be viewed as a rejection of the rationalism of Catholicism desiring to go back to the origins of Christianity for the brute facts in the Bible rather than relying on Scholastic or Catholic authority.



        Regarding Descartes, Wikipedia offers a hint as to why he may have had trouble with Catholic authorities:




        In shifting the debate from "what is true" to "of what can I be certain?," Descartes arguably shifted the authoritative guarantor of truth from God to humanity (even though Descartes himself claimed he received his visions from God)—while the traditional concept of "truth" implies an external authority, "certainty" instead relies on the judgment of the individual.




        If that best describes the events then rationalism (and the external authority grounded on it) characterized Catholicism while the Protestant revolt modeled itself more on a scientific pursuit through individual judgment of the brute facts each believer found in the Bible.





        Whitehead, A. N. Science and the Modern World. Retrieved from Internet Archive on October 5, 2019 at https://archive.org/details/alfrednorthwhiteheadscienceandthemodernworld1997/page/n19



        Wikipedia contributors. (2019, October 5). René Descartes. In Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. Retrieved 19:33, October 5, 2019, from https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ren%C3%A9_Descartes&oldid=919735446






        share|improve this answer
















        To suggest a different perspective, Whitehead writes the following: (page 8-9)




        The Reformation and the scientific movement were two aspects of the historical revolt which was the dominant intellectual movement of the later Renaissance. The appeal to the origins of Christianity, and Francis Bacon's appeal to efficient causes as against final causes, were two sides of one movement of thought....



        ....It is a great mistake to conceive this historical revolt as an appeal to reason. On the contrary, it was through and through an anti-intellectualist movement. It was the return to the contemplation of brute fact; and it was based on a recoil from the inflexible rationality of medieval thought.




        Protestantism could be viewed as a rejection of the rationalism of Catholicism desiring to go back to the origins of Christianity for the brute facts in the Bible rather than relying on Scholastic or Catholic authority.



        Regarding Descartes, Wikipedia offers a hint as to why he may have had trouble with Catholic authorities:




        In shifting the debate from "what is true" to "of what can I be certain?," Descartes arguably shifted the authoritative guarantor of truth from God to humanity (even though Descartes himself claimed he received his visions from God)—while the traditional concept of "truth" implies an external authority, "certainty" instead relies on the judgment of the individual.




        If that best describes the events then rationalism (and the external authority grounded on it) characterized Catholicism while the Protestant revolt modeled itself more on a scientific pursuit through individual judgment of the brute facts each believer found in the Bible.





        Whitehead, A. N. Science and the Modern World. Retrieved from Internet Archive on October 5, 2019 at https://archive.org/details/alfrednorthwhiteheadscienceandthemodernworld1997/page/n19



        Wikipedia contributors. (2019, October 5). René Descartes. In Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. Retrieved 19:33, October 5, 2019, from https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ren%C3%A9_Descartes&oldid=919735446







        share|improve this answer















        share|improve this answer




        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer








        edited 7 hours ago

























        answered 8 hours ago









        Frank HubenyFrank Hubeny

        16.6k6 gold badges19 silver badges72 bronze badges




        16.6k6 gold badges19 silver badges72 bronze badges


































            draft saved

            draft discarded



















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Philosophy Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphilosophy.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f67545%2frationalism-and-catholicism-protestantism%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown









            Popular posts from this blog

            Taj Mahal Inhaltsverzeichnis Aufbau | Geschichte | 350-Jahr-Feier | Heutige Bedeutung | Siehe auch |...

            Baia Sprie Cuprins Etimologie | Istorie | Demografie | Politică și administrație | Arii naturale...

            Nicolae Petrescu-Găină Cuprins Biografie | Opera | In memoriam | Varia | Controverse, incertitudini...