Do calculations require energy?What is the energy conversion efficiency of a computation device like a modern...
Should I compare a std::string to "string" or "string"s?
What's the largest optical telescope mirror ever put in space?
What is the giant octopus in the torture chamber for?
At what point in time did Dumbledore ask Snape for this favor?
Why only the fundamental frequency component is said to give useful power?
Does an ice chest packed full of frozen food need ice?
Can a user sell my software (MIT license) without modification?
How does an ordinary object become radioactive?
Using "subway" as name for London Underground?
What's up with this leaf?
Where does "0 packages can be updated." come from?
What's the name of this light airplane?
Is an early checkout possible at a hotel before its reception opens?
Why doesn't Adrian Toomes give up Spider-Man's identity?
What is the actual quality of machine translations?
Can the poison from Kingsmen be concocted?
Why is one of Madera Municipal's runways labelled with only "R" on both sides?
Smooth switching between 12 V batteries, with a toggle switch
Do any instruments not produce overtones?
What can I, as a user, do about offensive reviews in App Store?
Watts vs. Volt Amps
"You've got another thing coming" - translation into French
When conversion from Integer to Single may lose precision
Are there downsides to using std::string as a buffer?
Do calculations require energy?
What is the energy conversion efficiency of a computation device like a modern CPU?How much energy does a powerlifter need to perform a session of squats?trouble reconciling doppler shift for energy and momentum of lightShould we take the elevator instead of the stairs to save energy?Thermal expansion of solid body and calculation of work produced
$begingroup$
A typical computer takes some energy "from the wall" while operating. I know that energy is spent on:
- Heating various components (psu/vrm/cpu/ram/ssd, so on)
- Fan/air motion to remove that heat (also vibrations, absorbed by case and surroundings)
- Magnetic emission from various chokes and long +5/+12v wires.
Let's consider that PC is disconnected from the network and has no attached devices and wires other than power cord. So that electric energy has no other ways out/wires to go. Then, all those waste-factors (mentioned above) are parasitic, in the sense that we want typically to avoid/lower them.
But the computer also does some meaningful process called calculation. For example, calculating a list of a prime numbers, or splitting very big number to prime factors - that is not an easy tasks - and that cannot just be done "instantly".
So the question is: is there some other kind of "compute" energy (other than mentioned above)? Does the energy go somewhere else, other than mentioned above?
Or would I get exactly what we took out of the wall? (If we sum up heat + motion + emi waste, mentioned above).
I can even reword it: if we consider some theoretical recuperation device that would absorb every wasted watt of heat, emi and vibration from working PC (with 100% efficiency), and convert it back to electricity (also with 100% efficiency), would calculation run forever "for free"? Or is there some other energy leak spot?
energy energy-conservation
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
A typical computer takes some energy "from the wall" while operating. I know that energy is spent on:
- Heating various components (psu/vrm/cpu/ram/ssd, so on)
- Fan/air motion to remove that heat (also vibrations, absorbed by case and surroundings)
- Magnetic emission from various chokes and long +5/+12v wires.
Let's consider that PC is disconnected from the network and has no attached devices and wires other than power cord. So that electric energy has no other ways out/wires to go. Then, all those waste-factors (mentioned above) are parasitic, in the sense that we want typically to avoid/lower them.
But the computer also does some meaningful process called calculation. For example, calculating a list of a prime numbers, or splitting very big number to prime factors - that is not an easy tasks - and that cannot just be done "instantly".
So the question is: is there some other kind of "compute" energy (other than mentioned above)? Does the energy go somewhere else, other than mentioned above?
Or would I get exactly what we took out of the wall? (If we sum up heat + motion + emi waste, mentioned above).
I can even reword it: if we consider some theoretical recuperation device that would absorb every wasted watt of heat, emi and vibration from working PC (with 100% efficiency), and convert it back to electricity (also with 100% efficiency), would calculation run forever "for free"? Or is there some other energy leak spot?
energy energy-conservation
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
A typical computer takes some energy "from the wall" while operating. I know that energy is spent on:
- Heating various components (psu/vrm/cpu/ram/ssd, so on)
- Fan/air motion to remove that heat (also vibrations, absorbed by case and surroundings)
- Magnetic emission from various chokes and long +5/+12v wires.
Let's consider that PC is disconnected from the network and has no attached devices and wires other than power cord. So that electric energy has no other ways out/wires to go. Then, all those waste-factors (mentioned above) are parasitic, in the sense that we want typically to avoid/lower them.
But the computer also does some meaningful process called calculation. For example, calculating a list of a prime numbers, or splitting very big number to prime factors - that is not an easy tasks - and that cannot just be done "instantly".
So the question is: is there some other kind of "compute" energy (other than mentioned above)? Does the energy go somewhere else, other than mentioned above?
Or would I get exactly what we took out of the wall? (If we sum up heat + motion + emi waste, mentioned above).
I can even reword it: if we consider some theoretical recuperation device that would absorb every wasted watt of heat, emi and vibration from working PC (with 100% efficiency), and convert it back to electricity (also with 100% efficiency), would calculation run forever "for free"? Or is there some other energy leak spot?
energy energy-conservation
$endgroup$
A typical computer takes some energy "from the wall" while operating. I know that energy is spent on:
- Heating various components (psu/vrm/cpu/ram/ssd, so on)
- Fan/air motion to remove that heat (also vibrations, absorbed by case and surroundings)
- Magnetic emission from various chokes and long +5/+12v wires.
Let's consider that PC is disconnected from the network and has no attached devices and wires other than power cord. So that electric energy has no other ways out/wires to go. Then, all those waste-factors (mentioned above) are parasitic, in the sense that we want typically to avoid/lower them.
But the computer also does some meaningful process called calculation. For example, calculating a list of a prime numbers, or splitting very big number to prime factors - that is not an easy tasks - and that cannot just be done "instantly".
So the question is: is there some other kind of "compute" energy (other than mentioned above)? Does the energy go somewhere else, other than mentioned above?
Or would I get exactly what we took out of the wall? (If we sum up heat + motion + emi waste, mentioned above).
I can even reword it: if we consider some theoretical recuperation device that would absorb every wasted watt of heat, emi and vibration from working PC (with 100% efficiency), and convert it back to electricity (also with 100% efficiency), would calculation run forever "for free"? Or is there some other energy leak spot?
energy energy-conservation
energy energy-conservation
edited 4 hours ago
rghome
676413
676413
asked 10 hours ago
xakepp35xakepp35
1285
1285
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Landauer's principle relates to the smallest theoretical amount of energy required for computation.
The principle asserts that the minimum energy required to erase one bit of information is:
$k T ln 2$
where k is the Boltzmann constant (~1.38×10−23 J/K), T is the temperature of the environment, and ln 2 is the natural logarithm of 2 (~0.69315).
The derivation comes from the second law of thermodynamics and entropy.
From Wikipedia, the following paragraph illustrates how this compares with contemporary computers:
At 20 °C (room temperature, or 293.15 K), the Landauer limit
represents an energy of approximately 0.0172 eV, or 2.75 zJ.
Theoretically, room‑temperature computer memory operating at the
Landauer limit could be changed at a rate of one billion bits per
second with energy being converted to heat in the memory media at the
rate of only 2.85 trillionths of a watt (that is, at a rate of only
2.85 pJ/s). Modern computers use millions of times as much energy per second.
I suggest reading the whole article for more detail.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thanks alot, I think that modern humanity has no exact answer on "where does extra stuff goes". It's good that you've pointed me directly on how is this called.
$endgroup$
– xakepp35
9 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@xakepp35 The energy that Landauer's principle talks about is lost as heat, but modern computers produce a lot more waste heat than that theoretical minimum limit.
$endgroup$
– PM 2Ring
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
@PM2Ring So, in a free space, (with very low ambient T), in order to "erase a bit" we have to dissipate some energy, that would be emitted as some "small portion of microwave radiation".. and that is our computation price. correct?
$endgroup$
– xakepp35
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
@PM2Ring What if we have second computer, that has all bits initially zeroed out. To set them up it has to increase entropy.. So may it take that heat from first computer for its operation?
$endgroup$
– xakepp35
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
Let us continue this discussion in chat.
$endgroup$
– PM 2Ring
9 hours ago
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
Computer do cause a decrease in the amount of usable energy, which is consistent with the second law of thermodynamics, but there is no violation of the first law; the total energy is constant, and can only be converted to other forms. There might be some energy stored as potential energy within the computer (for instance, the "1" state of a memory unit might hold more potential energy than the "0" state), but there is no energy destroyed by the computer.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
so a "pure computation" process (which only exist "on paper") - is totally energy-free process? and energy consumption is only due to imperfection?
$endgroup$
– xakepp35
10 hours ago
$begingroup$
I mean is creating some order is "free", but actually arranging something (1s or 0s, whatever it's represented in) in that order - costs energy?
$endgroup$
– xakepp35
10 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
There is minimum, given by the Landauer Principle. It is not free.
$endgroup$
– rghome
10 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@xakepp35 If we're talking about total energy, rather than usable energy, then the first law of thermodynamics says that nothing "uses up" energy.
$endgroup$
– Acccumulation
10 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@xakepp35 I think that is another question about thermodynamics and entropy and it applies to any device (e.g. you can't take the exhaust heat of a car engine and power another car engine of the same size). I am not qualified to answer that well, except to say that the waste heat has a higher entropy than the fuel and so is not as useful.
$endgroup$
– rghome
9 hours ago
|
show 1 more comment
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "151"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphysics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f484076%2fdo-calculations-require-energy%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Landauer's principle relates to the smallest theoretical amount of energy required for computation.
The principle asserts that the minimum energy required to erase one bit of information is:
$k T ln 2$
where k is the Boltzmann constant (~1.38×10−23 J/K), T is the temperature of the environment, and ln 2 is the natural logarithm of 2 (~0.69315).
The derivation comes from the second law of thermodynamics and entropy.
From Wikipedia, the following paragraph illustrates how this compares with contemporary computers:
At 20 °C (room temperature, or 293.15 K), the Landauer limit
represents an energy of approximately 0.0172 eV, or 2.75 zJ.
Theoretically, room‑temperature computer memory operating at the
Landauer limit could be changed at a rate of one billion bits per
second with energy being converted to heat in the memory media at the
rate of only 2.85 trillionths of a watt (that is, at a rate of only
2.85 pJ/s). Modern computers use millions of times as much energy per second.
I suggest reading the whole article for more detail.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thanks alot, I think that modern humanity has no exact answer on "where does extra stuff goes". It's good that you've pointed me directly on how is this called.
$endgroup$
– xakepp35
9 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@xakepp35 The energy that Landauer's principle talks about is lost as heat, but modern computers produce a lot more waste heat than that theoretical minimum limit.
$endgroup$
– PM 2Ring
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
@PM2Ring So, in a free space, (with very low ambient T), in order to "erase a bit" we have to dissipate some energy, that would be emitted as some "small portion of microwave radiation".. and that is our computation price. correct?
$endgroup$
– xakepp35
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
@PM2Ring What if we have second computer, that has all bits initially zeroed out. To set them up it has to increase entropy.. So may it take that heat from first computer for its operation?
$endgroup$
– xakepp35
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
Let us continue this discussion in chat.
$endgroup$
– PM 2Ring
9 hours ago
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
Landauer's principle relates to the smallest theoretical amount of energy required for computation.
The principle asserts that the minimum energy required to erase one bit of information is:
$k T ln 2$
where k is the Boltzmann constant (~1.38×10−23 J/K), T is the temperature of the environment, and ln 2 is the natural logarithm of 2 (~0.69315).
The derivation comes from the second law of thermodynamics and entropy.
From Wikipedia, the following paragraph illustrates how this compares with contemporary computers:
At 20 °C (room temperature, or 293.15 K), the Landauer limit
represents an energy of approximately 0.0172 eV, or 2.75 zJ.
Theoretically, room‑temperature computer memory operating at the
Landauer limit could be changed at a rate of one billion bits per
second with energy being converted to heat in the memory media at the
rate of only 2.85 trillionths of a watt (that is, at a rate of only
2.85 pJ/s). Modern computers use millions of times as much energy per second.
I suggest reading the whole article for more detail.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thanks alot, I think that modern humanity has no exact answer on "where does extra stuff goes". It's good that you've pointed me directly on how is this called.
$endgroup$
– xakepp35
9 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@xakepp35 The energy that Landauer's principle talks about is lost as heat, but modern computers produce a lot more waste heat than that theoretical minimum limit.
$endgroup$
– PM 2Ring
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
@PM2Ring So, in a free space, (with very low ambient T), in order to "erase a bit" we have to dissipate some energy, that would be emitted as some "small portion of microwave radiation".. and that is our computation price. correct?
$endgroup$
– xakepp35
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
@PM2Ring What if we have second computer, that has all bits initially zeroed out. To set them up it has to increase entropy.. So may it take that heat from first computer for its operation?
$endgroup$
– xakepp35
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
Let us continue this discussion in chat.
$endgroup$
– PM 2Ring
9 hours ago
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
Landauer's principle relates to the smallest theoretical amount of energy required for computation.
The principle asserts that the minimum energy required to erase one bit of information is:
$k T ln 2$
where k is the Boltzmann constant (~1.38×10−23 J/K), T is the temperature of the environment, and ln 2 is the natural logarithm of 2 (~0.69315).
The derivation comes from the second law of thermodynamics and entropy.
From Wikipedia, the following paragraph illustrates how this compares with contemporary computers:
At 20 °C (room temperature, or 293.15 K), the Landauer limit
represents an energy of approximately 0.0172 eV, or 2.75 zJ.
Theoretically, room‑temperature computer memory operating at the
Landauer limit could be changed at a rate of one billion bits per
second with energy being converted to heat in the memory media at the
rate of only 2.85 trillionths of a watt (that is, at a rate of only
2.85 pJ/s). Modern computers use millions of times as much energy per second.
I suggest reading the whole article for more detail.
$endgroup$
Landauer's principle relates to the smallest theoretical amount of energy required for computation.
The principle asserts that the minimum energy required to erase one bit of information is:
$k T ln 2$
where k is the Boltzmann constant (~1.38×10−23 J/K), T is the temperature of the environment, and ln 2 is the natural logarithm of 2 (~0.69315).
The derivation comes from the second law of thermodynamics and entropy.
From Wikipedia, the following paragraph illustrates how this compares with contemporary computers:
At 20 °C (room temperature, or 293.15 K), the Landauer limit
represents an energy of approximately 0.0172 eV, or 2.75 zJ.
Theoretically, room‑temperature computer memory operating at the
Landauer limit could be changed at a rate of one billion bits per
second with energy being converted to heat in the memory media at the
rate of only 2.85 trillionths of a watt (that is, at a rate of only
2.85 pJ/s). Modern computers use millions of times as much energy per second.
I suggest reading the whole article for more detail.
answered 10 hours ago
rghomerghome
676413
676413
$begingroup$
Thanks alot, I think that modern humanity has no exact answer on "where does extra stuff goes". It's good that you've pointed me directly on how is this called.
$endgroup$
– xakepp35
9 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@xakepp35 The energy that Landauer's principle talks about is lost as heat, but modern computers produce a lot more waste heat than that theoretical minimum limit.
$endgroup$
– PM 2Ring
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
@PM2Ring So, in a free space, (with very low ambient T), in order to "erase a bit" we have to dissipate some energy, that would be emitted as some "small portion of microwave radiation".. and that is our computation price. correct?
$endgroup$
– xakepp35
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
@PM2Ring What if we have second computer, that has all bits initially zeroed out. To set them up it has to increase entropy.. So may it take that heat from first computer for its operation?
$endgroup$
– xakepp35
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
Let us continue this discussion in chat.
$endgroup$
– PM 2Ring
9 hours ago
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
Thanks alot, I think that modern humanity has no exact answer on "where does extra stuff goes". It's good that you've pointed me directly on how is this called.
$endgroup$
– xakepp35
9 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@xakepp35 The energy that Landauer's principle talks about is lost as heat, but modern computers produce a lot more waste heat than that theoretical minimum limit.
$endgroup$
– PM 2Ring
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
@PM2Ring So, in a free space, (with very low ambient T), in order to "erase a bit" we have to dissipate some energy, that would be emitted as some "small portion of microwave radiation".. and that is our computation price. correct?
$endgroup$
– xakepp35
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
@PM2Ring What if we have second computer, that has all bits initially zeroed out. To set them up it has to increase entropy.. So may it take that heat from first computer for its operation?
$endgroup$
– xakepp35
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
Let us continue this discussion in chat.
$endgroup$
– PM 2Ring
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
Thanks alot, I think that modern humanity has no exact answer on "where does extra stuff goes". It's good that you've pointed me directly on how is this called.
$endgroup$
– xakepp35
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
Thanks alot, I think that modern humanity has no exact answer on "where does extra stuff goes". It's good that you've pointed me directly on how is this called.
$endgroup$
– xakepp35
9 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
@xakepp35 The energy that Landauer's principle talks about is lost as heat, but modern computers produce a lot more waste heat than that theoretical minimum limit.
$endgroup$
– PM 2Ring
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
@xakepp35 The energy that Landauer's principle talks about is lost as heat, but modern computers produce a lot more waste heat than that theoretical minimum limit.
$endgroup$
– PM 2Ring
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
@PM2Ring So, in a free space, (with very low ambient T), in order to "erase a bit" we have to dissipate some energy, that would be emitted as some "small portion of microwave radiation".. and that is our computation price. correct?
$endgroup$
– xakepp35
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
@PM2Ring So, in a free space, (with very low ambient T), in order to "erase a bit" we have to dissipate some energy, that would be emitted as some "small portion of microwave radiation".. and that is our computation price. correct?
$endgroup$
– xakepp35
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
@PM2Ring What if we have second computer, that has all bits initially zeroed out. To set them up it has to increase entropy.. So may it take that heat from first computer for its operation?
$endgroup$
– xakepp35
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
@PM2Ring What if we have second computer, that has all bits initially zeroed out. To set them up it has to increase entropy.. So may it take that heat from first computer for its operation?
$endgroup$
– xakepp35
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
Let us continue this discussion in chat.
$endgroup$
– PM 2Ring
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
Let us continue this discussion in chat.
$endgroup$
– PM 2Ring
9 hours ago
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
Computer do cause a decrease in the amount of usable energy, which is consistent with the second law of thermodynamics, but there is no violation of the first law; the total energy is constant, and can only be converted to other forms. There might be some energy stored as potential energy within the computer (for instance, the "1" state of a memory unit might hold more potential energy than the "0" state), but there is no energy destroyed by the computer.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
so a "pure computation" process (which only exist "on paper") - is totally energy-free process? and energy consumption is only due to imperfection?
$endgroup$
– xakepp35
10 hours ago
$begingroup$
I mean is creating some order is "free", but actually arranging something (1s or 0s, whatever it's represented in) in that order - costs energy?
$endgroup$
– xakepp35
10 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
There is minimum, given by the Landauer Principle. It is not free.
$endgroup$
– rghome
10 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@xakepp35 If we're talking about total energy, rather than usable energy, then the first law of thermodynamics says that nothing "uses up" energy.
$endgroup$
– Acccumulation
10 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@xakepp35 I think that is another question about thermodynamics and entropy and it applies to any device (e.g. you can't take the exhaust heat of a car engine and power another car engine of the same size). I am not qualified to answer that well, except to say that the waste heat has a higher entropy than the fuel and so is not as useful.
$endgroup$
– rghome
9 hours ago
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
Computer do cause a decrease in the amount of usable energy, which is consistent with the second law of thermodynamics, but there is no violation of the first law; the total energy is constant, and can only be converted to other forms. There might be some energy stored as potential energy within the computer (for instance, the "1" state of a memory unit might hold more potential energy than the "0" state), but there is no energy destroyed by the computer.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
so a "pure computation" process (which only exist "on paper") - is totally energy-free process? and energy consumption is only due to imperfection?
$endgroup$
– xakepp35
10 hours ago
$begingroup$
I mean is creating some order is "free", but actually arranging something (1s or 0s, whatever it's represented in) in that order - costs energy?
$endgroup$
– xakepp35
10 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
There is minimum, given by the Landauer Principle. It is not free.
$endgroup$
– rghome
10 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@xakepp35 If we're talking about total energy, rather than usable energy, then the first law of thermodynamics says that nothing "uses up" energy.
$endgroup$
– Acccumulation
10 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@xakepp35 I think that is another question about thermodynamics and entropy and it applies to any device (e.g. you can't take the exhaust heat of a car engine and power another car engine of the same size). I am not qualified to answer that well, except to say that the waste heat has a higher entropy than the fuel and so is not as useful.
$endgroup$
– rghome
9 hours ago
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
Computer do cause a decrease in the amount of usable energy, which is consistent with the second law of thermodynamics, but there is no violation of the first law; the total energy is constant, and can only be converted to other forms. There might be some energy stored as potential energy within the computer (for instance, the "1" state of a memory unit might hold more potential energy than the "0" state), but there is no energy destroyed by the computer.
$endgroup$
Computer do cause a decrease in the amount of usable energy, which is consistent with the second law of thermodynamics, but there is no violation of the first law; the total energy is constant, and can only be converted to other forms. There might be some energy stored as potential energy within the computer (for instance, the "1" state of a memory unit might hold more potential energy than the "0" state), but there is no energy destroyed by the computer.
answered 10 hours ago
AcccumulationAcccumulation
3,934716
3,934716
$begingroup$
so a "pure computation" process (which only exist "on paper") - is totally energy-free process? and energy consumption is only due to imperfection?
$endgroup$
– xakepp35
10 hours ago
$begingroup$
I mean is creating some order is "free", but actually arranging something (1s or 0s, whatever it's represented in) in that order - costs energy?
$endgroup$
– xakepp35
10 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
There is minimum, given by the Landauer Principle. It is not free.
$endgroup$
– rghome
10 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@xakepp35 If we're talking about total energy, rather than usable energy, then the first law of thermodynamics says that nothing "uses up" energy.
$endgroup$
– Acccumulation
10 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@xakepp35 I think that is another question about thermodynamics and entropy and it applies to any device (e.g. you can't take the exhaust heat of a car engine and power another car engine of the same size). I am not qualified to answer that well, except to say that the waste heat has a higher entropy than the fuel and so is not as useful.
$endgroup$
– rghome
9 hours ago
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
so a "pure computation" process (which only exist "on paper") - is totally energy-free process? and energy consumption is only due to imperfection?
$endgroup$
– xakepp35
10 hours ago
$begingroup$
I mean is creating some order is "free", but actually arranging something (1s or 0s, whatever it's represented in) in that order - costs energy?
$endgroup$
– xakepp35
10 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
There is minimum, given by the Landauer Principle. It is not free.
$endgroup$
– rghome
10 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@xakepp35 If we're talking about total energy, rather than usable energy, then the first law of thermodynamics says that nothing "uses up" energy.
$endgroup$
– Acccumulation
10 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@xakepp35 I think that is another question about thermodynamics and entropy and it applies to any device (e.g. you can't take the exhaust heat of a car engine and power another car engine of the same size). I am not qualified to answer that well, except to say that the waste heat has a higher entropy than the fuel and so is not as useful.
$endgroup$
– rghome
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
so a "pure computation" process (which only exist "on paper") - is totally energy-free process? and energy consumption is only due to imperfection?
$endgroup$
– xakepp35
10 hours ago
$begingroup$
so a "pure computation" process (which only exist "on paper") - is totally energy-free process? and energy consumption is only due to imperfection?
$endgroup$
– xakepp35
10 hours ago
$begingroup$
I mean is creating some order is "free", but actually arranging something (1s or 0s, whatever it's represented in) in that order - costs energy?
$endgroup$
– xakepp35
10 hours ago
$begingroup$
I mean is creating some order is "free", but actually arranging something (1s or 0s, whatever it's represented in) in that order - costs energy?
$endgroup$
– xakepp35
10 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
There is minimum, given by the Landauer Principle. It is not free.
$endgroup$
– rghome
10 hours ago
$begingroup$
There is minimum, given by the Landauer Principle. It is not free.
$endgroup$
– rghome
10 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
@xakepp35 If we're talking about total energy, rather than usable energy, then the first law of thermodynamics says that nothing "uses up" energy.
$endgroup$
– Acccumulation
10 hours ago
$begingroup$
@xakepp35 If we're talking about total energy, rather than usable energy, then the first law of thermodynamics says that nothing "uses up" energy.
$endgroup$
– Acccumulation
10 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
@xakepp35 I think that is another question about thermodynamics and entropy and it applies to any device (e.g. you can't take the exhaust heat of a car engine and power another car engine of the same size). I am not qualified to answer that well, except to say that the waste heat has a higher entropy than the fuel and so is not as useful.
$endgroup$
– rghome
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
@xakepp35 I think that is another question about thermodynamics and entropy and it applies to any device (e.g. you can't take the exhaust heat of a car engine and power another car engine of the same size). I am not qualified to answer that well, except to say that the waste heat has a higher entropy than the fuel and so is not as useful.
$endgroup$
– rghome
9 hours ago
|
show 1 more comment
Thanks for contributing an answer to Physics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphysics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f484076%2fdo-calculations-require-energy%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown