Why baskervald(x) is as semibold as default?TeXLive/PDFTeX fonts loading problemMinionPro...
Why does there seem to be an extreme lack of public trashcans in Taiwan?
What does the homotopy coherent nerve do to spaces of enriched functors?
Dependent voltage/current sources
How to make a composition of functions prettier?
Why do (or did, until very recently) aircraft transponders wait to be interrogated before broadcasting beacon signals?
As easy as Three, Two, One... How fast can you go from Five to Four?
Professor Roman loves to teach unorthodox Chemistry
Is all-caps blackletter no longer taboo?
C++ logging library
What exactly "triggers an additional time" in the interaction between Afterlife and Teysa Karlov?
Forgot passport for Alaska cruise (Anchorage to Vancouver)
How to use the word seem
How to create two-week recurring alarms and reminders?
If absolute velocity does not exist, how can we say a rocket accelerates in empty space?
Do they make "karaoke" versions of concertos for solo practice?
Was self-modifying code possible using BASIC?
Quasar Redshifts
Why are ambiguous grammars bad?
Nth term of Van Eck Sequence
Should I be able to use the Gloom Stalker ranger's Dread Ambusher class feature when attacking before initiative has been rolled to add a d8 damage?
Savage Road Signs
Linked novellas where humans are engineered to adapt to a variety of environments
How can I list the different hex characters between two files?
What's the difference between DHCP and NAT? Are they mutually exclusive?
Why baskervald(x) is as semibold as default?
TeXLive/PDFTeX fonts loading problemMinionPro semibold/mediumUsing a handwriting font from myscriptfont.comHow to use semibold italic cmbright for bold math symbols?Font “AGaramondPro-semibold” cannot be foundCreating a custom character that automatically adjusts size in math mode?How do I get italic type using baskervald font?Training Tesseract with generated LaTeX filesTypesetting <= and < symbols using the default document fontBeamer semibold font
The baskervald(x) package is a clone of the Baskerville font. If I make a comparison between this image (extract of a Physics book)
and my MWE
documentclass[12pt]{article}
usepackage{baskervald}
usepackage[baskervaldx]{newtxmath}
begin{document}
[Delta t=t_f-t_i]
end{document}
I obtain this:
In mathematical mode, is there a possibility to make the characters lighter as the first picture?
fonts symbols
asked 8 hours ago
SebastianoSebastiano
12.9k42570
add a comment |
The baskervald(x) package is a clone of the Baskerville font. If I make a comparison between this image (extract of a Physics book)
and my MWE
documentclass[12pt]{article}
usepackage{baskervald}
usepackage[baskervaldx]{newtxmath}
begin{document}
[Delta t=t_f-t_i]
end{document}
I obtain this:
In mathematical mode, is there a possibility to make the characters lighter as the first picture?
fonts symbols
asked 8 hours ago
SebastianoSebastiano
12.9k42570
2
I don't see anything unexpected in the f(x)=frac example produced by your example? The math font is a virtual font so non alphabetic symbols are pulled from elsewhere (rtxr font) but the italic letters match the non math text as far as I can tell?
– David Carlisle
8 hours ago
@DavidCarlisle Some months ago I have printed a pdf file and, for example, usepackage[baskervaldx]{newtxmath} is a perfect semibold. What are rtxr font?
– Sebastiano
8 hours ago
add a comment |
The baskervald(x) package is a clone of the Baskerville font. If I make a comparison between this image (extract of a Physics book)
and my MWE
documentclass[12pt]{article}
usepackage{baskervald}
usepackage[baskervaldx]{newtxmath}
begin{document}
[Delta t=t_f-t_i]
end{document}
I obtain this:
In mathematical mode, is there a possibility to make the characters lighter as the first picture?
fonts symbols
asked 8 hours ago
SebastianoSebastiano
12.9k42570
The baskervald(x) package is a clone of the Baskerville font. If I make a comparison between this image (extract of a Physics book)
and my MWE
documentclass[12pt]{article}
usepackage{baskervald}
usepackage[baskervaldx]{newtxmath}
begin{document}
[Delta t=t_f-t_i]
end{document}
I obtain this:
In mathematical mode, is there a possibility to make the characters lighter as the first picture?
fonts symbols
fonts symbols
asked 8 hours ago
SebastianoSebastiano
12.9k42570
asked 8 hours ago
SebastianoSebastiano
12.9k42570
edited 7 hours ago
Sebastiano
asked 8 hours ago
SebastianoSebastiano
12.9k42570
asked 8 hours ago
SebastianoSebastiano
12.9k42570
asked 8 hours ago
SebastianoSebastiano
12.9k42570
12.9k42570
2
I don't see anything unexpected in the f(x)=frac example produced by your example? The math font is a virtual font so non alphabetic symbols are pulled from elsewhere (rtxr font) but the italic letters match the non math text as far as I can tell?
– David Carlisle
8 hours ago
@DavidCarlisle Some months ago I have printed a pdf file and, for example, usepackage[baskervaldx]{newtxmath} is a perfect semibold. What are rtxr font?
– Sebastiano
8 hours ago
add a comment |
2
I don't see anything unexpected in the f(x)=frac example produced by your example? The math font is a virtual font so non alphabetic symbols are pulled from elsewhere (rtxr font) but the italic letters match the non math text as far as I can tell?
– David Carlisle
8 hours ago
@DavidCarlisle Some months ago I have printed a pdf file and, for example, usepackage[baskervaldx]{newtxmath} is a perfect semibold. What are rtxr font?
– Sebastiano
8 hours ago
2
2
I don't see anything unexpected in the f(x)=frac example produced by your example? The math font is a virtual font so non alphabetic symbols are pulled from elsewhere (rtxr font) but the italic letters match the non math text as far as I can tell?
– David Carlisle
8 hours ago
I don't see anything unexpected in the f(x)=frac example produced by your example? The math font is a virtual font so non alphabetic symbols are pulled from elsewhere (rtxr font) but the italic letters match the non math text as far as I can tell?
– David Carlisle
8 hours ago
@DavidCarlisle Some months ago I have printed a pdf file and, for example, usepackage[baskervaldx]{newtxmath} is a perfect semibold. What are rtxr font?
– Sebastiano
8 hours ago
@DavidCarlisle Some months ago I have printed a pdf file and, for example, usepackage[baskervaldx]{newtxmath} is a perfect semibold. What are rtxr font?
– Sebastiano
8 hours ago
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
The fonts used in math do not seem any bolder than the text fonts, I changed the example to more easily compare. the fonts used for mathrm and mathit are identical to the text upright and italic, the font used for the default math italic as expected has wider sidebearings but is no bolder.
documentclass[12pt]{article}
%usepackage{librebaskerville}
usepackage{baskervald}
usepackage[baskervaldx]{newtxmath}
showoutput
begin{document}
This is an example.
$mathrm{This is an example.}$
textit{This is an example.}
$This is an example.$
$mathit{This is an example.}$
end{document}
pdffonts reports the fonts in the PDF as
name type encoding emb sub uni object ID
------------------------------------ ----------------- ---------------- --- --- --- ---------
VCRPNQ+BaskervaldADFStd-Regular Type 1 Custom yes yes no 4 0
GWOGHS+rtxmi Type 1 Builtin yes yes no 5 0
LNASWP+BaskervaldADFStd-Italic Type 1 Custom yes yes no 6 0
UCLGTI+Baskervaldx-Ita Type 1 Custom yes yes no 7 0
answered 8 hours ago
David CarlisleDavid Carlisle
509k4311591915
Voted positively. But I'm not very convinced. Compared to the first image and my output, the mathematical characters - see for example the subscripts - are lighter.
– Sebastiano
8 hours ago
1
@Sebastiano the font is just mechanically scaled so the subscripts are smaller and thinner that is just the way it is in almost all font sets other than cm that has a large collection of designed size fonts.
– David Carlisle
8 hours ago
1
@Sebastiano Your question was rather hard to read, i thought that you were saying that the weight of math and text within the same example did not match, I mainly addressed that. It looks like all these have a heavier font than the first image you show but with website resolution pngs and no source for your first image that isn't very informative and anyway it is not surprising if different digital versions of classic fonts have visible differences
– David Carlisle
8 hours ago
1
@Sebastiano It wasn't clear what you were comparing in these two phrases, they appear to be contradictory (one saying math was too bold, one saying it was too light) but I think you were comparing different things? "it can be observed that in mathematical mode the mathematical characters are lighter" v " in mathematical mode, is there a possibility to make the characters lighter"
– David Carlisle
8 hours ago
1
@Sebastiano I can not translate it if I do not know what it means.
– David Carlisle
7 hours ago
|
show 3 more comments
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "85"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f495195%2fwhy-baskervaldx-is-as-semibold-as-default%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
The fonts used in math do not seem any bolder than the text fonts, I changed the example to more easily compare. the fonts used for mathrm and mathit are identical to the text upright and italic, the font used for the default math italic as expected has wider sidebearings but is no bolder.
documentclass[12pt]{article}
%usepackage{librebaskerville}
usepackage{baskervald}
usepackage[baskervaldx]{newtxmath}
showoutput
begin{document}
This is an example.
$mathrm{This is an example.}$
textit{This is an example.}
$This is an example.$
$mathit{This is an example.}$
end{document}
pdffonts reports the fonts in the PDF as
name type encoding emb sub uni object ID
------------------------------------ ----------------- ---------------- --- --- --- ---------
VCRPNQ+BaskervaldADFStd-Regular Type 1 Custom yes yes no 4 0
GWOGHS+rtxmi Type 1 Builtin yes yes no 5 0
LNASWP+BaskervaldADFStd-Italic Type 1 Custom yes yes no 6 0
UCLGTI+Baskervaldx-Ita Type 1 Custom yes yes no 7 0
answered 8 hours ago
David CarlisleDavid Carlisle
509k4311591915
Voted positively. But I'm not very convinced. Compared to the first image and my output, the mathematical characters - see for example the subscripts - are lighter.
– Sebastiano
8 hours ago
1
@Sebastiano the font is just mechanically scaled so the subscripts are smaller and thinner that is just the way it is in almost all font sets other than cm that has a large collection of designed size fonts.
– David Carlisle
8 hours ago
1
@Sebastiano Your question was rather hard to read, i thought that you were saying that the weight of math and text within the same example did not match, I mainly addressed that. It looks like all these have a heavier font than the first image you show but with website resolution pngs and no source for your first image that isn't very informative and anyway it is not surprising if different digital versions of classic fonts have visible differences
– David Carlisle
8 hours ago
1
@Sebastiano It wasn't clear what you were comparing in these two phrases, they appear to be contradictory (one saying math was too bold, one saying it was too light) but I think you were comparing different things? "it can be observed that in mathematical mode the mathematical characters are lighter" v " in mathematical mode, is there a possibility to make the characters lighter"
– David Carlisle
8 hours ago
1
@Sebastiano I can not translate it if I do not know what it means.
– David Carlisle
7 hours ago
|
show 3 more comments
The fonts used in math do not seem any bolder than the text fonts, I changed the example to more easily compare. the fonts used for mathrm and mathit are identical to the text upright and italic, the font used for the default math italic as expected has wider sidebearings but is no bolder.
documentclass[12pt]{article}
%usepackage{librebaskerville}
usepackage{baskervald}
usepackage[baskervaldx]{newtxmath}
showoutput
begin{document}
This is an example.
$mathrm{This is an example.}$
textit{This is an example.}
$This is an example.$
$mathit{This is an example.}$
end{document}
pdffonts reports the fonts in the PDF as
name type encoding emb sub uni object ID
------------------------------------ ----------------- ---------------- --- --- --- ---------
VCRPNQ+BaskervaldADFStd-Regular Type 1 Custom yes yes no 4 0
GWOGHS+rtxmi Type 1 Builtin yes yes no 5 0
LNASWP+BaskervaldADFStd-Italic Type 1 Custom yes yes no 6 0
UCLGTI+Baskervaldx-Ita Type 1 Custom yes yes no 7 0
answered 8 hours ago
David CarlisleDavid Carlisle
509k4311591915
Voted positively. But I'm not very convinced. Compared to the first image and my output, the mathematical characters - see for example the subscripts - are lighter.
– Sebastiano
8 hours ago
1
@Sebastiano the font is just mechanically scaled so the subscripts are smaller and thinner that is just the way it is in almost all font sets other than cm that has a large collection of designed size fonts.
– David Carlisle
8 hours ago
1
@Sebastiano Your question was rather hard to read, i thought that you were saying that the weight of math and text within the same example did not match, I mainly addressed that. It looks like all these have a heavier font than the first image you show but with website resolution pngs and no source for your first image that isn't very informative and anyway it is not surprising if different digital versions of classic fonts have visible differences
– David Carlisle
8 hours ago
1
@Sebastiano It wasn't clear what you were comparing in these two phrases, they appear to be contradictory (one saying math was too bold, one saying it was too light) but I think you were comparing different things? "it can be observed that in mathematical mode the mathematical characters are lighter" v " in mathematical mode, is there a possibility to make the characters lighter"
– David Carlisle
8 hours ago
1
@Sebastiano I can not translate it if I do not know what it means.
– David Carlisle
7 hours ago
|
show 3 more comments
The fonts used in math do not seem any bolder than the text fonts, I changed the example to more easily compare. the fonts used for mathrm and mathit are identical to the text upright and italic, the font used for the default math italic as expected has wider sidebearings but is no bolder.
documentclass[12pt]{article}
%usepackage{librebaskerville}
usepackage{baskervald}
usepackage[baskervaldx]{newtxmath}
showoutput
begin{document}
This is an example.
$mathrm{This is an example.}$
textit{This is an example.}
$This is an example.$
$mathit{This is an example.}$
end{document}
pdffonts reports the fonts in the PDF as
name type encoding emb sub uni object ID
------------------------------------ ----------------- ---------------- --- --- --- ---------
VCRPNQ+BaskervaldADFStd-Regular Type 1 Custom yes yes no 4 0
GWOGHS+rtxmi Type 1 Builtin yes yes no 5 0
LNASWP+BaskervaldADFStd-Italic Type 1 Custom yes yes no 6 0
UCLGTI+Baskervaldx-Ita Type 1 Custom yes yes no 7 0
answered 8 hours ago
David CarlisleDavid Carlisle
509k4311591915
The fonts used in math do not seem any bolder than the text fonts, I changed the example to more easily compare. the fonts used for mathrm and mathit are identical to the text upright and italic, the font used for the default math italic as expected has wider sidebearings but is no bolder.
documentclass[12pt]{article}
%usepackage{librebaskerville}
usepackage{baskervald}
usepackage[baskervaldx]{newtxmath}
showoutput
begin{document}
This is an example.
$mathrm{This is an example.}$
textit{This is an example.}
$This is an example.$
$mathit{This is an example.}$
end{document}
pdffonts reports the fonts in the PDF as
name type encoding emb sub uni object ID
------------------------------------ ----------------- ---------------- --- --- --- ---------
VCRPNQ+BaskervaldADFStd-Regular Type 1 Custom yes yes no 4 0
GWOGHS+rtxmi Type 1 Builtin yes yes no 5 0
LNASWP+BaskervaldADFStd-Italic Type 1 Custom yes yes no 6 0
UCLGTI+Baskervaldx-Ita Type 1 Custom yes yes no 7 0
answered 8 hours ago
David CarlisleDavid Carlisle
509k4311591915
edited 8 hours ago
answered 8 hours ago
David CarlisleDavid Carlisle
509k4311591915
answered 8 hours ago
David CarlisleDavid Carlisle
509k4311591915
answered 8 hours ago
David CarlisleDavid Carlisle
509k4311591915
509k4311591915
Voted positively. But I'm not very convinced. Compared to the first image and my output, the mathematical characters - see for example the subscripts - are lighter.
– Sebastiano
8 hours ago
1
@Sebastiano the font is just mechanically scaled so the subscripts are smaller and thinner that is just the way it is in almost all font sets other than cm that has a large collection of designed size fonts.
– David Carlisle
8 hours ago
1
@Sebastiano Your question was rather hard to read, i thought that you were saying that the weight of math and text within the same example did not match, I mainly addressed that. It looks like all these have a heavier font than the first image you show but with website resolution pngs and no source for your first image that isn't very informative and anyway it is not surprising if different digital versions of classic fonts have visible differences
– David Carlisle
8 hours ago
1
@Sebastiano It wasn't clear what you were comparing in these two phrases, they appear to be contradictory (one saying math was too bold, one saying it was too light) but I think you were comparing different things? "it can be observed that in mathematical mode the mathematical characters are lighter" v " in mathematical mode, is there a possibility to make the characters lighter"
– David Carlisle
8 hours ago
1
@Sebastiano I can not translate it if I do not know what it means.
– David Carlisle
7 hours ago
|
show 3 more comments
Voted positively. But I'm not very convinced. Compared to the first image and my output, the mathematical characters - see for example the subscripts - are lighter.
– Sebastiano
8 hours ago
1
@Sebastiano the font is just mechanically scaled so the subscripts are smaller and thinner that is just the way it is in almost all font sets other than cm that has a large collection of designed size fonts.
– David Carlisle
8 hours ago
1
@Sebastiano Your question was rather hard to read, i thought that you were saying that the weight of math and text within the same example did not match, I mainly addressed that. It looks like all these have a heavier font than the first image you show but with website resolution pngs and no source for your first image that isn't very informative and anyway it is not surprising if different digital versions of classic fonts have visible differences
– David Carlisle
8 hours ago
1
@Sebastiano It wasn't clear what you were comparing in these two phrases, they appear to be contradictory (one saying math was too bold, one saying it was too light) but I think you were comparing different things? "it can be observed that in mathematical mode the mathematical characters are lighter" v " in mathematical mode, is there a possibility to make the characters lighter"
– David Carlisle
8 hours ago
1
@Sebastiano I can not translate it if I do not know what it means.
– David Carlisle
7 hours ago
Voted positively. But I'm not very convinced. Compared to the first image and my output, the mathematical characters - see for example the subscripts - are lighter.
– Sebastiano
8 hours ago
Voted positively. But I'm not very convinced. Compared to the first image and my output, the mathematical characters - see for example the subscripts - are lighter.
– Sebastiano
8 hours ago
1
1
@Sebastiano the font is just mechanically scaled so the subscripts are smaller and thinner that is just the way it is in almost all font sets other than cm that has a large collection of designed size fonts.
– David Carlisle
8 hours ago
@Sebastiano the font is just mechanically scaled so the subscripts are smaller and thinner that is just the way it is in almost all font sets other than cm that has a large collection of designed size fonts.
– David Carlisle
8 hours ago
1
1
@Sebastiano Your question was rather hard to read, i thought that you were saying that the weight of math and text within the same example did not match, I mainly addressed that. It looks like all these have a heavier font than the first image you show but with website resolution pngs and no source for your first image that isn't very informative and anyway it is not surprising if different digital versions of classic fonts have visible differences
– David Carlisle
8 hours ago
@Sebastiano Your question was rather hard to read, i thought that you were saying that the weight of math and text within the same example did not match, I mainly addressed that. It looks like all these have a heavier font than the first image you show but with website resolution pngs and no source for your first image that isn't very informative and anyway it is not surprising if different digital versions of classic fonts have visible differences
– David Carlisle
8 hours ago
1
1
@Sebastiano It wasn't clear what you were comparing in these two phrases, they appear to be contradictory (one saying math was too bold, one saying it was too light) but I think you were comparing different things? "it can be observed that in mathematical mode the mathematical characters are lighter" v " in mathematical mode, is there a possibility to make the characters lighter"
– David Carlisle
8 hours ago
@Sebastiano It wasn't clear what you were comparing in these two phrases, they appear to be contradictory (one saying math was too bold, one saying it was too light) but I think you were comparing different things? "it can be observed that in mathematical mode the mathematical characters are lighter" v " in mathematical mode, is there a possibility to make the characters lighter"
– David Carlisle
8 hours ago
1
1
@Sebastiano I can not translate it if I do not know what it means.
– David Carlisle
7 hours ago
@Sebastiano I can not translate it if I do not know what it means.
– David Carlisle
7 hours ago
|
show 3 more comments
Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f495195%2fwhy-baskervaldx-is-as-semibold-as-default%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
2
I don't see anything unexpected in the f(x)=frac example produced by your example? The math font is a virtual font so non alphabetic symbols are pulled from elsewhere (rtxr font) but the italic letters match the non math text as far as I can tell?
– David Carlisle
8 hours ago
@DavidCarlisle Some months ago I have printed a pdf file and, for example, usepackage[baskervaldx]{newtxmath} is a perfect semibold. What are rtxr font?
– Sebastiano
8 hours ago