Is multiplication of real numbers uniquely defined as being distributive over addition?Are the addition and...
Is Odin inconsistent about the powers of Mjolnir?
Colleagues speaking another language and it impacts work
Does bottle color affect mold growth?
Is this cheap "air conditioner" able to cool a room?
How to avoid ci-driven development..?
What can make Linux unresponsive for minutes when browsing certain websites?
Do other countries guarantee freedoms that the United States does not have?
Why does the ultra long-end of a yield curve invert?
Did silent film actors actually say their lines or did they simply improvise “dialogue” while being filmed?
Validation and verification of mathematical models
Is it double speak?
French equivalent of "Make leaps and bounds"
Did WWII Japanese soldiers engage in cannibalism of their enemies?
Can ads on a page read my password?
Did Apollo leave poop on the moon?
Using Select on Dataset with missing keys
Casting Goblin Matron with Plague Engineer on the battlefield
How can glass marbles naturally occur in a desert?
Erratic behavior by an internal employee against an external employee
Could one become a successful researcher by writing some really good papers while being outside academia?
Premier League simulation
Are there any financial disadvantages to living "below your means"?
How quickly could a country build a tall concrete wall around a city?
How would I as a DM create a smart phone-like spell/device my players could use?
Is multiplication of real numbers uniquely defined as being distributive over addition?
Are the addition and multiplication of real numbers, as we know them, unique?Real Numbers as Well Defined SetsHow is addition different than multiplication?Binary operation commutative, associative, and distributive over multiplicationA foundation where objects are unlabelledCommutative binary operations on $Bbb C$ that distribute over both multiplication and additionSo there's addition, multiplication, exponentiation and tetration, but is there a level before addition?Are the addition and multiplication of real numbers, as we know them, unique?Binary multiplication as combination of addition and left shiftChecking a set with the Axiom of IntegersIs addition on $mathbb{R}$ unique up to automorphism?
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}
$begingroup$
In the set of real numbers, I wonder whether the distributive law uniquely determines multiplication.
Suppose that for a function $f$: $Bbb{R}timesBbb{R}$ $to$ $Bbb{R}$ the following hold for every $x,y,z$, where $+$ is the usual addition
(as defined via Cauchy sequences of rationals), and $1$ is the known natural number:
- $f(x+y,z) = f(x,z) + f(y,z)$
- $f(x, y+z) = f(x,y) + f(x,z)$
- $f(1,x) = f(x,1) = x $
From the above does it follow that $f(x,y) = xy$, the usual multiplication?
In this post: Are the addition and multiplication of real numbers, as we know them, unique?
a somewhat related "dual" question is asked concerning addition, and a simple solution is given in the form of $(x^3+y^3)^{1/3}$. So am I missing something obvious here?
foundations binary-operations
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
In the set of real numbers, I wonder whether the distributive law uniquely determines multiplication.
Suppose that for a function $f$: $Bbb{R}timesBbb{R}$ $to$ $Bbb{R}$ the following hold for every $x,y,z$, where $+$ is the usual addition
(as defined via Cauchy sequences of rationals), and $1$ is the known natural number:
- $f(x+y,z) = f(x,z) + f(y,z)$
- $f(x, y+z) = f(x,y) + f(x,z)$
- $f(1,x) = f(x,1) = x $
From the above does it follow that $f(x,y) = xy$, the usual multiplication?
In this post: Are the addition and multiplication of real numbers, as we know them, unique?
a somewhat related "dual" question is asked concerning addition, and a simple solution is given in the form of $(x^3+y^3)^{1/3}$. So am I missing something obvious here?
foundations binary-operations
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
We can do that for natural numbers then for rationals hence for real numbers
$endgroup$
– Ameryr
8 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
In the set of real numbers, I wonder whether the distributive law uniquely determines multiplication.
Suppose that for a function $f$: $Bbb{R}timesBbb{R}$ $to$ $Bbb{R}$ the following hold for every $x,y,z$, where $+$ is the usual addition
(as defined via Cauchy sequences of rationals), and $1$ is the known natural number:
- $f(x+y,z) = f(x,z) + f(y,z)$
- $f(x, y+z) = f(x,y) + f(x,z)$
- $f(1,x) = f(x,1) = x $
From the above does it follow that $f(x,y) = xy$, the usual multiplication?
In this post: Are the addition and multiplication of real numbers, as we know them, unique?
a somewhat related "dual" question is asked concerning addition, and a simple solution is given in the form of $(x^3+y^3)^{1/3}$. So am I missing something obvious here?
foundations binary-operations
$endgroup$
In the set of real numbers, I wonder whether the distributive law uniquely determines multiplication.
Suppose that for a function $f$: $Bbb{R}timesBbb{R}$ $to$ $Bbb{R}$ the following hold for every $x,y,z$, where $+$ is the usual addition
(as defined via Cauchy sequences of rationals), and $1$ is the known natural number:
- $f(x+y,z) = f(x,z) + f(y,z)$
- $f(x, y+z) = f(x,y) + f(x,z)$
- $f(1,x) = f(x,1) = x $
From the above does it follow that $f(x,y) = xy$, the usual multiplication?
In this post: Are the addition and multiplication of real numbers, as we know them, unique?
a somewhat related "dual" question is asked concerning addition, and a simple solution is given in the form of $(x^3+y^3)^{1/3}$. So am I missing something obvious here?
foundations binary-operations
foundations binary-operations
edited 8 hours ago
José Carlos Santos
206k26 gold badges159 silver badges283 bronze badges
206k26 gold badges159 silver badges283 bronze badges
asked 8 hours ago
exp8jexp8j
1249 bronze badges
1249 bronze badges
$begingroup$
We can do that for natural numbers then for rationals hence for real numbers
$endgroup$
– Ameryr
8 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
We can do that for natural numbers then for rationals hence for real numbers
$endgroup$
– Ameryr
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
We can do that for natural numbers then for rationals hence for real numbers
$endgroup$
– Ameryr
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
We can do that for natural numbers then for rationals hence for real numbers
$endgroup$
– Ameryr
8 hours ago
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
For one thing $Bbb R$ is a $Bbb Q$-vector space, therefore by choosing a Hamel basis it is possible to define uncountably many symmetric $Bbb Q$-bilinear maps $Bbb RtimesBbb RtoBbb R$, even with the restriction $phi(1,bullet)=phi(bullet,1)=id$. The only continuous one among these is the usual product, though.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Good answer! Would be good to detail the way to define a $mathbb Q$-bilinear map from a Hamel basis and what a Hamel basis is, as the OP is probably not familiar with it.
$endgroup$
– mathcounterexamples.net
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Gae. S. Could you suggest a good reference where I can study the concepts that you mention? In fact, what motivated me to ask this question is that I've just started studying calculus in normed spaces on my own, and I bumped into bilinear maps...
$endgroup$
– exp8j
8 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
First for a natural $n$
$f(x,n)= underbrace{f(x,1)+...+f(x,1)}_{n text{. times}}=nx$
Then for a rational $1/n$
$x=f(x,1)=f(x,n/n) = n f(x,1/n) $ so $f(x,1/n) =x/n$
Now for a $y$ which is a Cauchy sequence of rational numbers $y=lim r_n$
$f(x,y) = f(x,lim r_n) = lim f(x,r_n)= lim x r_n = xy$ pulling limit outside require the continuity of $f$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3317613%2fis-multiplication-of-real-numbers-uniquely-defined-as-being-distributive-over-ad%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
For one thing $Bbb R$ is a $Bbb Q$-vector space, therefore by choosing a Hamel basis it is possible to define uncountably many symmetric $Bbb Q$-bilinear maps $Bbb RtimesBbb RtoBbb R$, even with the restriction $phi(1,bullet)=phi(bullet,1)=id$. The only continuous one among these is the usual product, though.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Good answer! Would be good to detail the way to define a $mathbb Q$-bilinear map from a Hamel basis and what a Hamel basis is, as the OP is probably not familiar with it.
$endgroup$
– mathcounterexamples.net
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Gae. S. Could you suggest a good reference where I can study the concepts that you mention? In fact, what motivated me to ask this question is that I've just started studying calculus in normed spaces on my own, and I bumped into bilinear maps...
$endgroup$
– exp8j
8 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
For one thing $Bbb R$ is a $Bbb Q$-vector space, therefore by choosing a Hamel basis it is possible to define uncountably many symmetric $Bbb Q$-bilinear maps $Bbb RtimesBbb RtoBbb R$, even with the restriction $phi(1,bullet)=phi(bullet,1)=id$. The only continuous one among these is the usual product, though.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Good answer! Would be good to detail the way to define a $mathbb Q$-bilinear map from a Hamel basis and what a Hamel basis is, as the OP is probably not familiar with it.
$endgroup$
– mathcounterexamples.net
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Gae. S. Could you suggest a good reference where I can study the concepts that you mention? In fact, what motivated me to ask this question is that I've just started studying calculus in normed spaces on my own, and I bumped into bilinear maps...
$endgroup$
– exp8j
8 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
For one thing $Bbb R$ is a $Bbb Q$-vector space, therefore by choosing a Hamel basis it is possible to define uncountably many symmetric $Bbb Q$-bilinear maps $Bbb RtimesBbb RtoBbb R$, even with the restriction $phi(1,bullet)=phi(bullet,1)=id$. The only continuous one among these is the usual product, though.
$endgroup$
For one thing $Bbb R$ is a $Bbb Q$-vector space, therefore by choosing a Hamel basis it is possible to define uncountably many symmetric $Bbb Q$-bilinear maps $Bbb RtimesBbb RtoBbb R$, even with the restriction $phi(1,bullet)=phi(bullet,1)=id$. The only continuous one among these is the usual product, though.
edited 8 hours ago
answered 8 hours ago
Gae. S.Gae. S.
1,2745 silver badges14 bronze badges
1,2745 silver badges14 bronze badges
$begingroup$
Good answer! Would be good to detail the way to define a $mathbb Q$-bilinear map from a Hamel basis and what a Hamel basis is, as the OP is probably not familiar with it.
$endgroup$
– mathcounterexamples.net
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Gae. S. Could you suggest a good reference where I can study the concepts that you mention? In fact, what motivated me to ask this question is that I've just started studying calculus in normed spaces on my own, and I bumped into bilinear maps...
$endgroup$
– exp8j
8 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Good answer! Would be good to detail the way to define a $mathbb Q$-bilinear map from a Hamel basis and what a Hamel basis is, as the OP is probably not familiar with it.
$endgroup$
– mathcounterexamples.net
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Gae. S. Could you suggest a good reference where I can study the concepts that you mention? In fact, what motivated me to ask this question is that I've just started studying calculus in normed spaces on my own, and I bumped into bilinear maps...
$endgroup$
– exp8j
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
Good answer! Would be good to detail the way to define a $mathbb Q$-bilinear map from a Hamel basis and what a Hamel basis is, as the OP is probably not familiar with it.
$endgroup$
– mathcounterexamples.net
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
Good answer! Would be good to detail the way to define a $mathbb Q$-bilinear map from a Hamel basis and what a Hamel basis is, as the OP is probably not familiar with it.
$endgroup$
– mathcounterexamples.net
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Gae. S. Could you suggest a good reference where I can study the concepts that you mention? In fact, what motivated me to ask this question is that I've just started studying calculus in normed spaces on my own, and I bumped into bilinear maps...
$endgroup$
– exp8j
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Gae. S. Could you suggest a good reference where I can study the concepts that you mention? In fact, what motivated me to ask this question is that I've just started studying calculus in normed spaces on my own, and I bumped into bilinear maps...
$endgroup$
– exp8j
8 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
First for a natural $n$
$f(x,n)= underbrace{f(x,1)+...+f(x,1)}_{n text{. times}}=nx$
Then for a rational $1/n$
$x=f(x,1)=f(x,n/n) = n f(x,1/n) $ so $f(x,1/n) =x/n$
Now for a $y$ which is a Cauchy sequence of rational numbers $y=lim r_n$
$f(x,y) = f(x,lim r_n) = lim f(x,r_n)= lim x r_n = xy$ pulling limit outside require the continuity of $f$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
First for a natural $n$
$f(x,n)= underbrace{f(x,1)+...+f(x,1)}_{n text{. times}}=nx$
Then for a rational $1/n$
$x=f(x,1)=f(x,n/n) = n f(x,1/n) $ so $f(x,1/n) =x/n$
Now for a $y$ which is a Cauchy sequence of rational numbers $y=lim r_n$
$f(x,y) = f(x,lim r_n) = lim f(x,r_n)= lim x r_n = xy$ pulling limit outside require the continuity of $f$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
First for a natural $n$
$f(x,n)= underbrace{f(x,1)+...+f(x,1)}_{n text{. times}}=nx$
Then for a rational $1/n$
$x=f(x,1)=f(x,n/n) = n f(x,1/n) $ so $f(x,1/n) =x/n$
Now for a $y$ which is a Cauchy sequence of rational numbers $y=lim r_n$
$f(x,y) = f(x,lim r_n) = lim f(x,r_n)= lim x r_n = xy$ pulling limit outside require the continuity of $f$
$endgroup$
First for a natural $n$
$f(x,n)= underbrace{f(x,1)+...+f(x,1)}_{n text{. times}}=nx$
Then for a rational $1/n$
$x=f(x,1)=f(x,n/n) = n f(x,1/n) $ so $f(x,1/n) =x/n$
Now for a $y$ which is a Cauchy sequence of rational numbers $y=lim r_n$
$f(x,y) = f(x,lim r_n) = lim f(x,r_n)= lim x r_n = xy$ pulling limit outside require the continuity of $f$
answered 8 hours ago
AmeryrAmeryr
8423 silver badges12 bronze badges
8423 silver badges12 bronze badges
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3317613%2fis-multiplication-of-real-numbers-uniquely-defined-as-being-distributive-over-ad%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
We can do that for natural numbers then for rationals hence for real numbers
$endgroup$
– Ameryr
8 hours ago