Mdthbs

Word or idiom defining something barely functional

Is this cheap "air conditioner" able to cool a room?

Why does this Pokémon I just hatched need to be healed?

What are good ways to improve as a writer other than writing courses?

Are there any differences in causality between linear and logistic regression?

Evaluate the following limit .

Colleagues speaking another language and it impacts work

What is a "Genuine Geraldo interviewee"?

Why should public servants be apolitical?

Looking for a new job because of relocation - is it okay to tell the real reason?

How to mark beverage cans in a cooler for a blind person?

How to display a duet in lyrics?

Can a character who casts Shapechange and turns into a spellcaster use innate spellcasting to cast spells with a long casting time?

How can you evade tax by getting employment income just in equity, then using this equity as collateral to take out loan?

How do I explain to a team that the project they will work on for six months will certainly be cancelled?

Pretty heat maps

Ex-contractor published company source code and secrets online

How to say "fit" in Latin?

Plausibility of Ice Eaters in the Arctic

Ordering a word list

Why did the RAAF procure the F/A-18 despite being purpose-built for carriers?

How to help new students accept function notation

What method to use in a batch apex in order to get authentication token from a remote server?

How do I calculate the difference in lens reach between a superzoom compact and a DSLR zoom lens?

Was the 2019 Lion King film made through motion capture?

How was the opening scene with the fly made?How was the “pen through the lip” scene shot?How did they film Danny tricycle riding through the hotel?How was this opening title sequence from Atkinson's Maigret made?What was the filming technique used to film “Jim's Ride”?How do they film someone being stabbed with a weapon that goes all the way through?How was the motorcycle scene in The Matrix Reloaded made?How/why was the slow motion coin shot achieved in Scrooged?

.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}

11

In the movie The Jungle Book, Favreau utilized motion capture with certain actors, expressing a desire to avoid overusing the technology in order to prevent evoking an uncanny valley effect. This is a reference from Wikipedia.

I wonder if The Lion King (2019) movie has used motion capture. If some scenes have used motion capture in the movie, what are those scenes?

_{I couldn't find any authentic source confirming that Lion King was made with performance capture.}

film-techniques the-lion-king-2019

share|improve this question

edited 1 hour ago

curiousdannii

53744 silver badges1010 bronze badges

asked yesterday

ashveliashveli

1,72344 gold badges1919 silver badges4444 bronze badges

• 
  
  
  

  
  3
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  It is not a live action film in any sense of the phrase. Nothing you see was shot with a camera. The entire film is animated. It is 100% an animated film.
  
  – only_pro
  14 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  @BruceWayne I had a similar moment of confusion when I first looked at it.
  
  – JimmyJames
  10 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  1
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  @only_pro According to a special I saw on TV, strictly speaking it's not 100% animated, because they included a single unnamed shot which was actually filmed with a camera. The point still stands though.
  
  – Alexander O'Mara
  10 hours ago
  
  
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  @AlexanderO'Mara I wasn't aware of that, but you're right, that would still make it an animated movie (that happen to have one live action scene).
  
  – only_pro
  10 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

11

In the movie The Jungle Book, Favreau utilized motion capture with certain actors, expressing a desire to avoid overusing the technology in order to prevent evoking an uncanny valley effect. This is a reference from Wikipedia.

I wonder if The Lion King (2019) movie has used motion capture. If some scenes have used motion capture in the movie, what are those scenes?

_{I couldn't find any authentic source confirming that Lion King was made with performance capture.}

film-techniques the-lion-king-2019

share|improve this question

edited 1 hour ago

curiousdannii

53744 silver badges1010 bronze badges

asked yesterday

ashveliashveli

1,72344 gold badges1919 silver badges4444 bronze badges

• 
  
  
  

  
  3
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  It is not a live action film in any sense of the phrase. Nothing you see was shot with a camera. The entire film is animated. It is 100% an animated film.
  
  – only_pro
  14 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  @BruceWayne I had a similar moment of confusion when I first looked at it.
  
  – JimmyJames
  10 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  1
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  @only_pro According to a special I saw on TV, strictly speaking it's not 100% animated, because they included a single unnamed shot which was actually filmed with a camera. The point still stands though.
  
  – Alexander O'Mara
  10 hours ago
  
  
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  @AlexanderO'Mara I wasn't aware of that, but you're right, that would still make it an animated movie (that happen to have one live action scene).
  
  – only_pro
  10 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

In the movie The Jungle Book, Favreau utilized motion capture with certain actors, expressing a desire to avoid overusing the technology in order to prevent evoking an uncanny valley effect. This is a reference from Wikipedia.

I wonder if The Lion King (2019) movie has used motion capture. If some scenes have used motion capture in the movie, what are those scenes?

_{I couldn't find any authentic source confirming that Lion King was made with performance capture.}

film-techniques the-lion-king-2019

share|improve this question

edited 1 hour ago

curiousdannii

53744 silver badges1010 bronze badges

asked yesterday

ashveliashveli

1,72344 gold badges1919 silver badges4444 bronze badges

share|improve this question

edited 1 hour ago

curiousdannii

53744 silver badges1010 bronze badges

asked yesterday

ashveliashveli

1,72344 gold badges1919 silver badges4444 bronze badges

share|improve this question

edited 1 hour ago

curiousdannii

53744 silver badges1010 bronze badges

asked yesterday

ashveliashveli

1,72344 gold badges1919 silver badges4444 bronze badges

edited 1 hour ago

curiousdannii

53744 silver badges1010 bronze badges

edited 1 hour ago

curiousdannii

53744 silver badges1010 bronze badges

asked yesterday

ashveliashveli

1,72344 gold badges1919 silver badges4444 bronze badges

asked yesterday

ashveliashveli

1,72344 gold badges1919 silver badges4444 bronze badges

2 Answers
2

active

oldest

votes

15

The simple answer is no, it's not motion captured. But there is even confusion about it being considered live-action or animated for award nominations.

From vanityfair:

Disney’s upcoming Lion King adaptation has reached a slight hurdle. The film, a remake of the 1994 animated classic, is not exactly a “live-action” movie because all of its animals are computer-generated, though plenty of people and media outlets have called it that. But director Jon Favreau also argues that it isn’t technically right to label the film “animated“ either

“Well, it’s difficult because it’s neither, really,” he told SlashFilm. “It depends what standard you’re using. Because there’s no real animals and there’s no real cameras and there’s not even any performance that’s being captured that’s underlying data that’s real. Everything is coming through the hands of artists.”

For additional trivial information, there was one scene in the film which was not made on computers as per Favreau's tweet:

share|improve this answer

edited 23 hours ago

answered 23 hours ago

Ankit SharmaAnkit Sharma

84k6969 gold badges469469 silver badges683683 bronze badges

• 
  
  
  

  
  13
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  I understand by what criteria Jon Favreau could conclude that it isn't "live-action", it has no action by a living creature. But by what criteria is he also concluding that neither is it animated? If "everything is coming through the hands of artists", that's pretty much the definition of "animated" isn't it?
  
  – RBarryYoung
  14 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  3
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  @RBarryYoung I think he may be being pretentious when he says it's not right to call it animated -- he's suggesting that what they did is so much more realistic than anything else that it shouldn't be in the same category. But I think you could have said something similar about the original Toy Story at the time.
  
  – Barmar
  13 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  2
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  @JPhi1618 The word for that is "lifelike". But the process is animation. Very sophisticated animation, but still animation. And Toy Story was extremely sophisticated for its time, as was Roger Rabbit in its time.
  
  – Barmar
  12 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  1
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  The point is that there's a difference between the process and the effect. It looks like live action, but it was created using animation. But maybe Favreau was treating the word "animated" not as referring to the process, but as a common synonym for "cartoony".
  
  – Barmar
  12 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  1
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  I think the confusion is animated=cartoon, which is not the case. If animation is totally realistic, i.e. indistinguishable from reality to an audience, then it is definitely not a cartoon, and nor is it live action. CG or CGI would describe it well.
  
  – CJ Dennis
  4 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  

 | 
show 5 more comments

0

In an interview with Collider, Jon Favreau said:

...we don’t do motion capture for performance, because we don’t want
to do it. We don’t want to put markers on animals, we don’t want to
involve live action, live animals in this. In Jungle Book, we didn’t
have to. I think that’s a nice next step for movies, is to leave the
animals alone.

and

What we’ll do for performance is I’ll have the actors in this room, we
clear it out, it’s a soundproof room. We have microphones, and instead
of recording with music stands and a sound booth like we do in
animated movies, I’ll instead have them performing standing up, almost
like you would in a motion capture stage, except no tracking markers,
no data, no metadata’s being recorded. It’s only long-lens video
cameras to get their faces and performances, and that allows the mall
to overlap and perform together and improvise and do whatever we want.

share|improve this answer

answered 9 hours ago

RajRaj

88811 silver badge1212 bronze badges

add a comment | 

15

The simple answer is no, it's not motion captured. But there is even confusion about it being considered live-action or animated for award nominations.

From vanityfair:

Disney’s upcoming Lion King adaptation has reached a slight hurdle. The film, a remake of the 1994 animated classic, is not exactly a “live-action” movie because all of its animals are computer-generated, though plenty of people and media outlets have called it that. But director Jon Favreau also argues that it isn’t technically right to label the film “animated“ either

“Well, it’s difficult because it’s neither, really,” he told SlashFilm. “It depends what standard you’re using. Because there’s no real animals and there’s no real cameras and there’s not even any performance that’s being captured that’s underlying data that’s real. Everything is coming through the hands of artists.”

For additional trivial information, there was one scene in the film which was not made on computers as per Favreau's tweet:

share|improve this answer

edited 23 hours ago

answered 23 hours ago

Ankit SharmaAnkit Sharma

84k6969 gold badges469469 silver badges683683 bronze badges

• 
  
  
  

  
  13
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  I understand by what criteria Jon Favreau could conclude that it isn't "live-action", it has no action by a living creature. But by what criteria is he also concluding that neither is it animated? If "everything is coming through the hands of artists", that's pretty much the definition of "animated" isn't it?
  
  – RBarryYoung
  14 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  3
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  @RBarryYoung I think he may be being pretentious when he says it's not right to call it animated -- he's suggesting that what they did is so much more realistic than anything else that it shouldn't be in the same category. But I think you could have said something similar about the original Toy Story at the time.
  
  – Barmar
  13 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  2
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  @JPhi1618 The word for that is "lifelike". But the process is animation. Very sophisticated animation, but still animation. And Toy Story was extremely sophisticated for its time, as was Roger Rabbit in its time.
  
  – Barmar
  12 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  1
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  The point is that there's a difference between the process and the effect. It looks like live action, but it was created using animation. But maybe Favreau was treating the word "animated" not as referring to the process, but as a common synonym for "cartoony".
  
  – Barmar
  12 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  1
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  I think the confusion is animated=cartoon, which is not the case. If animation is totally realistic, i.e. indistinguishable from reality to an audience, then it is definitely not a cartoon, and nor is it live action. CG or CGI would describe it well.
  
  – CJ Dennis
  4 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  

 | 
show 5 more comments

15

The simple answer is no, it's not motion captured. But there is even confusion about it being considered live-action or animated for award nominations.

From vanityfair:

Disney’s upcoming Lion King adaptation has reached a slight hurdle. The film, a remake of the 1994 animated classic, is not exactly a “live-action” movie because all of its animals are computer-generated, though plenty of people and media outlets have called it that. But director Jon Favreau also argues that it isn’t technically right to label the film “animated“ either

“Well, it’s difficult because it’s neither, really,” he told SlashFilm. “It depends what standard you’re using. Because there’s no real animals and there’s no real cameras and there’s not even any performance that’s being captured that’s underlying data that’s real. Everything is coming through the hands of artists.”

For additional trivial information, there was one scene in the film which was not made on computers as per Favreau's tweet:

share|improve this answer

edited 23 hours ago

answered 23 hours ago

Ankit SharmaAnkit Sharma

84k6969 gold badges469469 silver badges683683 bronze badges

• 
  
  
  

  
  13
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  I understand by what criteria Jon Favreau could conclude that it isn't "live-action", it has no action by a living creature. But by what criteria is he also concluding that neither is it animated? If "everything is coming through the hands of artists", that's pretty much the definition of "animated" isn't it?
  
  – RBarryYoung
  14 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  3
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  @RBarryYoung I think he may be being pretentious when he says it's not right to call it animated -- he's suggesting that what they did is so much more realistic than anything else that it shouldn't be in the same category. But I think you could have said something similar about the original Toy Story at the time.
  
  – Barmar
  13 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  2
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  @JPhi1618 The word for that is "lifelike". But the process is animation. Very sophisticated animation, but still animation. And Toy Story was extremely sophisticated for its time, as was Roger Rabbit in its time.
  
  – Barmar
  12 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  1
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  The point is that there's a difference between the process and the effect. It looks like live action, but it was created using animation. But maybe Favreau was treating the word "animated" not as referring to the process, but as a common synonym for "cartoony".
  
  – Barmar
  12 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  1
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  I think the confusion is animated=cartoon, which is not the case. If animation is totally realistic, i.e. indistinguishable from reality to an audience, then it is definitely not a cartoon, and nor is it live action. CG or CGI would describe it well.
  
  – CJ Dennis
  4 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  

 | 
show 5 more comments

The simple answer is no, it's not motion captured. But there is even confusion about it being considered live-action or animated for award nominations.

From vanityfair:

Disney’s upcoming Lion King adaptation has reached a slight hurdle. The film, a remake of the 1994 animated classic, is not exactly a “live-action” movie because all of its animals are computer-generated, though plenty of people and media outlets have called it that. But director Jon Favreau also argues that it isn’t technically right to label the film “animated“ either

“Well, it’s difficult because it’s neither, really,” he told SlashFilm. “It depends what standard you’re using. Because there’s no real animals and there’s no real cameras and there’s not even any performance that’s being captured that’s underlying data that’s real. Everything is coming through the hands of artists.”

For additional trivial information, there was one scene in the film which was not made on computers as per Favreau's tweet:

share|improve this answer

edited 23 hours ago

answered 23 hours ago

Ankit SharmaAnkit Sharma

84k6969 gold badges469469 silver badges683683 bronze badges

share|improve this answer

edited 23 hours ago

answered 23 hours ago

Ankit SharmaAnkit Sharma

84k6969 gold badges469469 silver badges683683 bronze badges

answered 23 hours ago

Ankit SharmaAnkit Sharma

84k6969 gold badges469469 silver badges683683 bronze badges

answered 23 hours ago

Ankit SharmaAnkit Sharma

84k6969 gold badges469469 silver badges683683 bronze badges

0

In an interview with Collider, Jon Favreau said:

...we don’t do motion capture for performance, because we don’t want
to do it. We don’t want to put markers on animals, we don’t want to
involve live action, live animals in this. In Jungle Book, we didn’t
have to. I think that’s a nice next step for movies, is to leave the
animals alone.

and

What we’ll do for performance is I’ll have the actors in this room, we
clear it out, it’s a soundproof room. We have microphones, and instead
of recording with music stands and a sound booth like we do in
animated movies, I’ll instead have them performing standing up, almost
like you would in a motion capture stage, except no tracking markers,
no data, no metadata’s being recorded. It’s only long-lens video
cameras to get their faces and performances, and that allows the mall
to overlap and perform together and improvise and do whatever we want.

share|improve this answer

answered 9 hours ago

RajRaj

88811 silver badge1212 bronze badges

add a comment | 

0

In an interview with Collider, Jon Favreau said:

...we don’t do motion capture for performance, because we don’t want
to do it. We don’t want to put markers on animals, we don’t want to
involve live action, live animals in this. In Jungle Book, we didn’t
have to. I think that’s a nice next step for movies, is to leave the
animals alone.

and

What we’ll do for performance is I’ll have the actors in this room, we
clear it out, it’s a soundproof room. We have microphones, and instead
of recording with music stands and a sound booth like we do in
animated movies, I’ll instead have them performing standing up, almost
like you would in a motion capture stage, except no tracking markers,
no data, no metadata’s being recorded. It’s only long-lens video
cameras to get their faces and performances, and that allows the mall
to overlap and perform together and improvise and do whatever we want.

share|improve this answer

answered 9 hours ago

RajRaj

88811 silver badge1212 bronze badges

add a comment | 

In an interview with Collider, Jon Favreau said:

...we don’t do motion capture for performance, because we don’t want
to do it. We don’t want to put markers on animals, we don’t want to
involve live action, live animals in this. In Jungle Book, we didn’t
have to. I think that’s a nice next step for movies, is to leave the
animals alone.

and

What we’ll do for performance is I’ll have the actors in this room, we
clear it out, it’s a soundproof room. We have microphones, and instead
of recording with music stands and a sound booth like we do in
animated movies, I’ll instead have them performing standing up, almost
like you would in a motion capture stage, except no tracking markers,
no data, no metadata’s being recorded. It’s only long-lens video
cameras to get their faces and performances, and that allows the mall
to overlap and perform together and improvise and do whatever we want.

share|improve this answer

answered 9 hours ago

RajRaj

88811 silver badge1212 bronze badges

share|improve this answer

answered 9 hours ago

RajRaj

88811 silver badge1212 bronze badges

answered 9 hours ago

RajRaj

88811 silver badge1212 bronze badges

answered 9 hours ago

RajRaj

88811 silver badge1212 bronze badges