Can the Fixed-Term Parliaments Act be bypassed by a simple bill?Why did Labour support the snap election?Is...

Everyone Gets a Window Seat

Did the Soviet army intentionally send troops (e.g. penal battalions) running over minefields?

Looking for circuit board material that can be dissolved

How do we decide/plan an SLA for an NP-hard optimization process running in production?

Why do Russians sometimes spell "жирный" (fatty) as "жырный"?

Why such a singular place for bird watching?

Replace Only First Occurence after Pattern

How dangerous are my worn rims?

Giving a good fancy look to a simple table

How to level a picture frame hung on a single nail?

The answer is a girl's name (my future granddaughter) - can anyone help?

Disable all sound permanently

Does the 'java' command compile Java programs?

How can Germany increase investments in Russia while EU economic sanctions against Russia are still in place?

GPLv3 forces us to make code available, but to who?

Can the Fixed-Term Parliaments Act be bypassed by a simple bill?

How do we know neutrons have no charge?

Can an untrusted VPN client monitor my network activity?

How to interpret the challenge rating of creatures?

Booting Ubuntu from USB drive on MSI motherboard -- EVERYTHING fails

Could Boris Johnson face criminal charges for illegally proroguing Parliament?

Is there an in-universe explanation of how Frodo's arrival in Valinor was recorded in the Red Book?

Why does `FindFit` fail so badly in this simple case?

Why not add cuspidal curves in the moduli space of stable curves?



Can the Fixed-Term Parliaments Act be bypassed by a simple bill?


Why did Labour support the snap election?Is there a minimum time frame that a Prime Minister may set an early election for?Is the Fixed-term Parliaments Act binding upon the UK parliament?If, on 12 December, the House of Commons passes, by a simple majority, a vote of “no confidence” in Theresa May's government, what happens next?Were three-line whips more (or less) common before the Fixed-term Parliaments Act?By what mechanism was the 2017 UK General Election called?What are the procedural differences in calling a general election “notwithstanding the FTPA”?Could a simple-majority bill for a general election, passing through both houses be amended by the SNP to provide for a further Scottish referendum?What happens if the UK government refuses to function or carry out its duties?






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{
margin-bottom:0;
}
.everyonelovesstackoverflow{position:absolute;height:1px;width:1px;opacity:0;top:0;left:0;pointer-events:none;}








3















The Fixed-Term Parliaments Act sets out the conditions for calling a general election, including a two-thirds majority vote in the House for an early general election.



But could a bill be presented to the House calling for a general election that could pass on a simple majority?










share|improve this question






















  • 1





    Passage in the commons by a simple majority is not sufficient for a bill to become law. The house of lords must also be involved.

    – phoog
    8 hours ago


















3















The Fixed-Term Parliaments Act sets out the conditions for calling a general election, including a two-thirds majority vote in the House for an early general election.



But could a bill be presented to the House calling for a general election that could pass on a simple majority?










share|improve this question






















  • 1





    Passage in the commons by a simple majority is not sufficient for a bill to become law. The house of lords must also be involved.

    – phoog
    8 hours ago














3












3








3








The Fixed-Term Parliaments Act sets out the conditions for calling a general election, including a two-thirds majority vote in the House for an early general election.



But could a bill be presented to the House calling for a general election that could pass on a simple majority?










share|improve this question
















The Fixed-Term Parliaments Act sets out the conditions for calling a general election, including a two-thirds majority vote in the House for an early general election.



But could a bill be presented to the House calling for a general election that could pass on a simple majority?







united-kingdom house-of-commons






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 5 hours ago









Martin Schröder

1,9722 gold badges14 silver badges36 bronze badges




1,9722 gold badges14 silver badges36 bronze badges










asked 9 hours ago









BenBen

5,2781 gold badge24 silver badges65 bronze badges




5,2781 gold badge24 silver badges65 bronze badges











  • 1





    Passage in the commons by a simple majority is not sufficient for a bill to become law. The house of lords must also be involved.

    – phoog
    8 hours ago














  • 1





    Passage in the commons by a simple majority is not sufficient for a bill to become law. The house of lords must also be involved.

    – phoog
    8 hours ago








1




1





Passage in the commons by a simple majority is not sufficient for a bill to become law. The house of lords must also be involved.

– phoog
8 hours ago





Passage in the commons by a simple majority is not sufficient for a bill to become law. The house of lords must also be involved.

– phoog
8 hours ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















7
















Yes, but such a bill would have to be approved by both the Commons and the Lords (by a simple majority). Or if the Lords didn't approve it, the commons could force it through under the Parliament Act, but there would still be possibly a substantial delay.



The FTPA allows the PM to call a general election without consulting the Lords providing he or she has the votes of 2/3 of Parliament.



Notwithstanding the implicit ability of any Parliament to repeal part or all of any previous act of parliament, the FTPA sets out intentions. It is intended that a 2/3 majority should be required before a government calls an election so that the government would normally need the support of opposition parties. The FTPA describes how the process should go in the normal procedure, not how the procedure should be changed in exceptional situations.






share|improve this answer



































    2
















    Yes. Any Act of Parliament can be amended or repealed by a later Act of Parliament.



    To quote Wikipedia:




    No Parliament can bind a future parliament (that is, it cannot pass a law that cannot be changed or reversed by a future Parliament).







    share|improve this answer


























    • So, why did they bother with the two-thirds number?

      – Ben
      8 hours ago








    • 3





      @Ben: the idea is that an early general election should only occur if there is cross-party support. If there is, then all it takes is a single motion in the Commons (with the 2/3 majority). Passing a new Act of Parliament takes longer, requires the agreement of the Lords - and can be amended. The danger of opposition amendments makes this unattractive to the current government.

      – Steve Melnikoff
      8 hours ago






    • 1





      With a majority vote, yes - but the current government doesn't have one.

      – Steve Melnikoff
      8 hours ago






    • 1





      @Ben: a government with a majority certainly can, as it can simply decline to put it on the schedule. However, if the opposition are able to gain control of the schedule, then the govt may not be able to do that - in the Commons. In the Lords, the procedures are different, and no party has a majority, so I'm not sure; but it seems unlikely, as the Lords were content to pass the Benn bill.

      – Steve Melnikoff
      8 hours ago






    • 1





      @Ben at the moment the government wants a general election and the opposition does not. So if anyone would try to bypass the FTPA with a new act of parliament it would be the government rather than the opposition.

      – phoog
      8 hours ago













    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "475"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/"u003ecc by-sa 4.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });















    draft saved

    draft discarded
















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpolitics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f45908%2fcan-the-fixed-term-parliaments-act-be-bypassed-by-a-simple-bill%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    7
















    Yes, but such a bill would have to be approved by both the Commons and the Lords (by a simple majority). Or if the Lords didn't approve it, the commons could force it through under the Parliament Act, but there would still be possibly a substantial delay.



    The FTPA allows the PM to call a general election without consulting the Lords providing he or she has the votes of 2/3 of Parliament.



    Notwithstanding the implicit ability of any Parliament to repeal part or all of any previous act of parliament, the FTPA sets out intentions. It is intended that a 2/3 majority should be required before a government calls an election so that the government would normally need the support of opposition parties. The FTPA describes how the process should go in the normal procedure, not how the procedure should be changed in exceptional situations.






    share|improve this answer
































      7
















      Yes, but such a bill would have to be approved by both the Commons and the Lords (by a simple majority). Or if the Lords didn't approve it, the commons could force it through under the Parliament Act, but there would still be possibly a substantial delay.



      The FTPA allows the PM to call a general election without consulting the Lords providing he or she has the votes of 2/3 of Parliament.



      Notwithstanding the implicit ability of any Parliament to repeal part or all of any previous act of parliament, the FTPA sets out intentions. It is intended that a 2/3 majority should be required before a government calls an election so that the government would normally need the support of opposition parties. The FTPA describes how the process should go in the normal procedure, not how the procedure should be changed in exceptional situations.






      share|improve this answer






























        7














        7










        7









        Yes, but such a bill would have to be approved by both the Commons and the Lords (by a simple majority). Or if the Lords didn't approve it, the commons could force it through under the Parliament Act, but there would still be possibly a substantial delay.



        The FTPA allows the PM to call a general election without consulting the Lords providing he or she has the votes of 2/3 of Parliament.



        Notwithstanding the implicit ability of any Parliament to repeal part or all of any previous act of parliament, the FTPA sets out intentions. It is intended that a 2/3 majority should be required before a government calls an election so that the government would normally need the support of opposition parties. The FTPA describes how the process should go in the normal procedure, not how the procedure should be changed in exceptional situations.






        share|improve this answer















        Yes, but such a bill would have to be approved by both the Commons and the Lords (by a simple majority). Or if the Lords didn't approve it, the commons could force it through under the Parliament Act, but there would still be possibly a substantial delay.



        The FTPA allows the PM to call a general election without consulting the Lords providing he or she has the votes of 2/3 of Parliament.



        Notwithstanding the implicit ability of any Parliament to repeal part or all of any previous act of parliament, the FTPA sets out intentions. It is intended that a 2/3 majority should be required before a government calls an election so that the government would normally need the support of opposition parties. The FTPA describes how the process should go in the normal procedure, not how the procedure should be changed in exceptional situations.







        share|improve this answer














        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer








        edited 8 hours ago

























        answered 8 hours ago









        James KJames K

        44.3k8 gold badges123 silver badges186 bronze badges




        44.3k8 gold badges123 silver badges186 bronze badges




























            2
















            Yes. Any Act of Parliament can be amended or repealed by a later Act of Parliament.



            To quote Wikipedia:




            No Parliament can bind a future parliament (that is, it cannot pass a law that cannot be changed or reversed by a future Parliament).







            share|improve this answer


























            • So, why did they bother with the two-thirds number?

              – Ben
              8 hours ago








            • 3





              @Ben: the idea is that an early general election should only occur if there is cross-party support. If there is, then all it takes is a single motion in the Commons (with the 2/3 majority). Passing a new Act of Parliament takes longer, requires the agreement of the Lords - and can be amended. The danger of opposition amendments makes this unattractive to the current government.

              – Steve Melnikoff
              8 hours ago






            • 1





              With a majority vote, yes - but the current government doesn't have one.

              – Steve Melnikoff
              8 hours ago






            • 1





              @Ben: a government with a majority certainly can, as it can simply decline to put it on the schedule. However, if the opposition are able to gain control of the schedule, then the govt may not be able to do that - in the Commons. In the Lords, the procedures are different, and no party has a majority, so I'm not sure; but it seems unlikely, as the Lords were content to pass the Benn bill.

              – Steve Melnikoff
              8 hours ago






            • 1





              @Ben at the moment the government wants a general election and the opposition does not. So if anyone would try to bypass the FTPA with a new act of parliament it would be the government rather than the opposition.

              – phoog
              8 hours ago
















            2
















            Yes. Any Act of Parliament can be amended or repealed by a later Act of Parliament.



            To quote Wikipedia:




            No Parliament can bind a future parliament (that is, it cannot pass a law that cannot be changed or reversed by a future Parliament).







            share|improve this answer


























            • So, why did they bother with the two-thirds number?

              – Ben
              8 hours ago








            • 3





              @Ben: the idea is that an early general election should only occur if there is cross-party support. If there is, then all it takes is a single motion in the Commons (with the 2/3 majority). Passing a new Act of Parliament takes longer, requires the agreement of the Lords - and can be amended. The danger of opposition amendments makes this unattractive to the current government.

              – Steve Melnikoff
              8 hours ago






            • 1





              With a majority vote, yes - but the current government doesn't have one.

              – Steve Melnikoff
              8 hours ago






            • 1





              @Ben: a government with a majority certainly can, as it can simply decline to put it on the schedule. However, if the opposition are able to gain control of the schedule, then the govt may not be able to do that - in the Commons. In the Lords, the procedures are different, and no party has a majority, so I'm not sure; but it seems unlikely, as the Lords were content to pass the Benn bill.

              – Steve Melnikoff
              8 hours ago






            • 1





              @Ben at the moment the government wants a general election and the opposition does not. So if anyone would try to bypass the FTPA with a new act of parliament it would be the government rather than the opposition.

              – phoog
              8 hours ago














            2














            2










            2









            Yes. Any Act of Parliament can be amended or repealed by a later Act of Parliament.



            To quote Wikipedia:




            No Parliament can bind a future parliament (that is, it cannot pass a law that cannot be changed or reversed by a future Parliament).







            share|improve this answer













            Yes. Any Act of Parliament can be amended or repealed by a later Act of Parliament.



            To quote Wikipedia:




            No Parliament can bind a future parliament (that is, it cannot pass a law that cannot be changed or reversed by a future Parliament).








            share|improve this answer












            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer










            answered 8 hours ago









            Steve MelnikoffSteve Melnikoff

            7,0592 gold badges24 silver badges46 bronze badges




            7,0592 gold badges24 silver badges46 bronze badges
















            • So, why did they bother with the two-thirds number?

              – Ben
              8 hours ago








            • 3





              @Ben: the idea is that an early general election should only occur if there is cross-party support. If there is, then all it takes is a single motion in the Commons (with the 2/3 majority). Passing a new Act of Parliament takes longer, requires the agreement of the Lords - and can be amended. The danger of opposition amendments makes this unattractive to the current government.

              – Steve Melnikoff
              8 hours ago






            • 1





              With a majority vote, yes - but the current government doesn't have one.

              – Steve Melnikoff
              8 hours ago






            • 1





              @Ben: a government with a majority certainly can, as it can simply decline to put it on the schedule. However, if the opposition are able to gain control of the schedule, then the govt may not be able to do that - in the Commons. In the Lords, the procedures are different, and no party has a majority, so I'm not sure; but it seems unlikely, as the Lords were content to pass the Benn bill.

              – Steve Melnikoff
              8 hours ago






            • 1





              @Ben at the moment the government wants a general election and the opposition does not. So if anyone would try to bypass the FTPA with a new act of parliament it would be the government rather than the opposition.

              – phoog
              8 hours ago



















            • So, why did they bother with the two-thirds number?

              – Ben
              8 hours ago








            • 3





              @Ben: the idea is that an early general election should only occur if there is cross-party support. If there is, then all it takes is a single motion in the Commons (with the 2/3 majority). Passing a new Act of Parliament takes longer, requires the agreement of the Lords - and can be amended. The danger of opposition amendments makes this unattractive to the current government.

              – Steve Melnikoff
              8 hours ago






            • 1





              With a majority vote, yes - but the current government doesn't have one.

              – Steve Melnikoff
              8 hours ago






            • 1





              @Ben: a government with a majority certainly can, as it can simply decline to put it on the schedule. However, if the opposition are able to gain control of the schedule, then the govt may not be able to do that - in the Commons. In the Lords, the procedures are different, and no party has a majority, so I'm not sure; but it seems unlikely, as the Lords were content to pass the Benn bill.

              – Steve Melnikoff
              8 hours ago






            • 1





              @Ben at the moment the government wants a general election and the opposition does not. So if anyone would try to bypass the FTPA with a new act of parliament it would be the government rather than the opposition.

              – phoog
              8 hours ago

















            So, why did they bother with the two-thirds number?

            – Ben
            8 hours ago







            So, why did they bother with the two-thirds number?

            – Ben
            8 hours ago






            3




            3





            @Ben: the idea is that an early general election should only occur if there is cross-party support. If there is, then all it takes is a single motion in the Commons (with the 2/3 majority). Passing a new Act of Parliament takes longer, requires the agreement of the Lords - and can be amended. The danger of opposition amendments makes this unattractive to the current government.

            – Steve Melnikoff
            8 hours ago





            @Ben: the idea is that an early general election should only occur if there is cross-party support. If there is, then all it takes is a single motion in the Commons (with the 2/3 majority). Passing a new Act of Parliament takes longer, requires the agreement of the Lords - and can be amended. The danger of opposition amendments makes this unattractive to the current government.

            – Steve Melnikoff
            8 hours ago




            1




            1





            With a majority vote, yes - but the current government doesn't have one.

            – Steve Melnikoff
            8 hours ago





            With a majority vote, yes - but the current government doesn't have one.

            – Steve Melnikoff
            8 hours ago




            1




            1





            @Ben: a government with a majority certainly can, as it can simply decline to put it on the schedule. However, if the opposition are able to gain control of the schedule, then the govt may not be able to do that - in the Commons. In the Lords, the procedures are different, and no party has a majority, so I'm not sure; but it seems unlikely, as the Lords were content to pass the Benn bill.

            – Steve Melnikoff
            8 hours ago





            @Ben: a government with a majority certainly can, as it can simply decline to put it on the schedule. However, if the opposition are able to gain control of the schedule, then the govt may not be able to do that - in the Commons. In the Lords, the procedures are different, and no party has a majority, so I'm not sure; but it seems unlikely, as the Lords were content to pass the Benn bill.

            – Steve Melnikoff
            8 hours ago




            1




            1





            @Ben at the moment the government wants a general election and the opposition does not. So if anyone would try to bypass the FTPA with a new act of parliament it would be the government rather than the opposition.

            – phoog
            8 hours ago





            @Ben at the moment the government wants a general election and the opposition does not. So if anyone would try to bypass the FTPA with a new act of parliament it would be the government rather than the opposition.

            – phoog
            8 hours ago



















            draft saved

            draft discarded



















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Politics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpolitics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f45908%2fcan-the-fixed-term-parliaments-act-be-bypassed-by-a-simple-bill%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Hudson River Historic District Contents Geography History The district today Aesthetics Cultural...

            The number designs the writing. Feandra Aversely Definition: The act of ingrafting a sprig or shoot of one...

            Ayherre Geografie Demografie Externe links Navigatiemenu43° 23′ NB, 1° 15′ WL43° 23′ NB, 1°...