GPLv3 forces us to make code available, but to who?Does using Stanford NER in a website count as distributing...
Is the illusion created by Invoke Duplicity affected by difficult terrain?
Does the app TikTok violate trademark?
Calculate the Ultraradical
Why is STARTTLS still used?
Avoiding dust scattering when you drill
Does variance make sense in a fully immutable language?
Top off gas with old oil, is that bad?
Why isn't there armor to protect from spells in the Potterverse?
How deep is the liquid in a half-full hemisphere?
Pushing the e-pawn
Is there no "respectively" in german language when listing (enumerating) something?
What makes learning more difficult as we age?
GPLv3 forces us to make code available, but to who?
what organs or modifications would be needed to have hairy fish?
A famous scholar sent me an unpublished draft of hers. Then she died. I think her work should be published. What should I do?
Is there a relationship between prime numbers and music?
Why does it seem the best way to make a living is to invest in real estate?
お仕事に学校頑張って meaning
How to stop the death waves in my city?
What happens to a net with the Returning Weapon artificer infusion after it hits?
Selection Sort Algorithm (Python)
Garage door sticks on a bolt
Lost passport and visa, tried to reapply, got rejected twice. What are my next steps?
How do we know neutrons have no charge?
GPLv3 forces us to make code available, but to who?
Does using Stanford NER in a website count as distributing it?What do I have to include in the binary package as “corresponding source code” for GPL licensed software?Who owns the copyright to the code which was paid for to write?Of the differences between the GPLv3 and the AGPLv3 texts: what to make of them?Relicensing an MIT licensed project under the GPL that has non code contributions from othersGPLv2 Wordpress Application - SellingUsing iText library with AGPL license to make application open sourcedWho is the copyright holder when GPLv2 project API is used?What widely available software license is appropriate if I want to freely distribute but keep my own right to sell?Commercial license where the code can be seen/edited by others but not monetized by others
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}
I've read that GPLv3 imposes that we should make the source code of our app available.
But, available to who?
In case we sell our GPLv3 software, does it mean we have to make it available to those we sell the software to? Or to everybody else that didn't purchase it as well? Such as providing a repository online with the code?
licensing gpl distribution
migrated from softwareengineering.stackexchange.com 9 hours ago
This question came from our site for professionals, academics, and students working within the systems development life cycle.
add a comment
|
I've read that GPLv3 imposes that we should make the source code of our app available.
But, available to who?
In case we sell our GPLv3 software, does it mean we have to make it available to those we sell the software to? Or to everybody else that didn't purchase it as well? Such as providing a repository online with the code?
licensing gpl distribution
migrated from softwareengineering.stackexchange.com 9 hours ago
This question came from our site for professionals, academics, and students working within the systems development life cycle.
You only have to give the source code to the people you sell your software to. However, the GPL allows those recipients to give it to anyone else for free.
– Brandin
7 hours ago
@Brandin: minor nitpick - "... people you distribute your software to." The person you gave a free trial or beta-test copy to is also entitled to the source code, the same as the the person who paid money to buy it from you.
– Stobor
1 hour ago
add a comment
|
I've read that GPLv3 imposes that we should make the source code of our app available.
But, available to who?
In case we sell our GPLv3 software, does it mean we have to make it available to those we sell the software to? Or to everybody else that didn't purchase it as well? Such as providing a repository online with the code?
licensing gpl distribution
I've read that GPLv3 imposes that we should make the source code of our app available.
But, available to who?
In case we sell our GPLv3 software, does it mean we have to make it available to those we sell the software to? Or to everybody else that didn't purchase it as well? Such as providing a repository online with the code?
licensing gpl distribution
licensing gpl distribution
asked 10 hours ago
AlvaroAlvaro
1193 bronze badges
1193 bronze badges
migrated from softwareengineering.stackexchange.com 9 hours ago
This question came from our site for professionals, academics, and students working within the systems development life cycle.
migrated from softwareengineering.stackexchange.com 9 hours ago
This question came from our site for professionals, academics, and students working within the systems development life cycle.
migrated from softwareengineering.stackexchange.com 9 hours ago
This question came from our site for professionals, academics, and students working within the systems development life cycle.
You only have to give the source code to the people you sell your software to. However, the GPL allows those recipients to give it to anyone else for free.
– Brandin
7 hours ago
@Brandin: minor nitpick - "... people you distribute your software to." The person you gave a free trial or beta-test copy to is also entitled to the source code, the same as the the person who paid money to buy it from you.
– Stobor
1 hour ago
add a comment
|
You only have to give the source code to the people you sell your software to. However, the GPL allows those recipients to give it to anyone else for free.
– Brandin
7 hours ago
@Brandin: minor nitpick - "... people you distribute your software to." The person you gave a free trial or beta-test copy to is also entitled to the source code, the same as the the person who paid money to buy it from you.
– Stobor
1 hour ago
You only have to give the source code to the people you sell your software to. However, the GPL allows those recipients to give it to anyone else for free.
– Brandin
7 hours ago
You only have to give the source code to the people you sell your software to. However, the GPL allows those recipients to give it to anyone else for free.
– Brandin
7 hours ago
@Brandin: minor nitpick - "... people you distribute your software to." The person you gave a free trial or beta-test copy to is also entitled to the source code, the same as the the person who paid money to buy it from you.
– Stobor
1 hour ago
@Brandin: minor nitpick - "... people you distribute your software to." The person you gave a free trial or beta-test copy to is also entitled to the source code, the same as the the person who paid money to buy it from you.
– Stobor
1 hour ago
add a comment
|
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
To any recipients. You do not have to make the source code available to the public, but have to provide the source code to anyone who received the software from you.
The details here depend on how you want to provide the source code (see section 6 of the GPLv3):
The easiest way is to always bundle the corresponding source code when you give someone a copy of the software.
If you offer the software for download, you can also offer the corresponding source for download at the same place. For example, any places where you offer your app could link to a GitHub repository with the source code.
Under certain circumstances, you can include a written offer to provide the corresponding source code. This written offer must be valid for at least three years, sometimes longer. You must then provide the software to anyone who contacts you with a copy of that offer, not just to those to whom you gave the software directly.
- If you only distribute the software “occasionally and noncommercially” in unmodified form, you can also pass along a copy of a written offer that you received.
- You can satisfy a written offer either by providing the source code on a physical medium (you may charge postage etc), or by offering the source code for download.
Under no circumstances can you charge any fees for the source code itself.
What do you mean by "sometimes longer" for the written offer?
– Brandin
7 hours ago
1
@Brandin The “certain circumstances” where GPLv3 allows written offers are physical products, and the written offer must be honored “for at least three years and […] for as long as you offer spare parts or customer support for that product model”.
– amon
6 hours ago
I don't understand the part that says "Under no circumstances can you charge any fees for the source code itself." What if the code itself is the product itself? For example when dealing with a Javascript component for the web? Or a HTML template? Or a PHP script? There's no compilation there at all. The code is all developers need to use it.
– Alvaro
2 hours ago
add a comment
|
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "619"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/"u003ecc by-sa 4.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fopensource.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f8836%2fgplv3-forces-us-to-make-code-available-but-to-who%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
To any recipients. You do not have to make the source code available to the public, but have to provide the source code to anyone who received the software from you.
The details here depend on how you want to provide the source code (see section 6 of the GPLv3):
The easiest way is to always bundle the corresponding source code when you give someone a copy of the software.
If you offer the software for download, you can also offer the corresponding source for download at the same place. For example, any places where you offer your app could link to a GitHub repository with the source code.
Under certain circumstances, you can include a written offer to provide the corresponding source code. This written offer must be valid for at least three years, sometimes longer. You must then provide the software to anyone who contacts you with a copy of that offer, not just to those to whom you gave the software directly.
- If you only distribute the software “occasionally and noncommercially” in unmodified form, you can also pass along a copy of a written offer that you received.
- You can satisfy a written offer either by providing the source code on a physical medium (you may charge postage etc), or by offering the source code for download.
Under no circumstances can you charge any fees for the source code itself.
What do you mean by "sometimes longer" for the written offer?
– Brandin
7 hours ago
1
@Brandin The “certain circumstances” where GPLv3 allows written offers are physical products, and the written offer must be honored “for at least three years and […] for as long as you offer spare parts or customer support for that product model”.
– amon
6 hours ago
I don't understand the part that says "Under no circumstances can you charge any fees for the source code itself." What if the code itself is the product itself? For example when dealing with a Javascript component for the web? Or a HTML template? Or a PHP script? There's no compilation there at all. The code is all developers need to use it.
– Alvaro
2 hours ago
add a comment
|
To any recipients. You do not have to make the source code available to the public, but have to provide the source code to anyone who received the software from you.
The details here depend on how you want to provide the source code (see section 6 of the GPLv3):
The easiest way is to always bundle the corresponding source code when you give someone a copy of the software.
If you offer the software for download, you can also offer the corresponding source for download at the same place. For example, any places where you offer your app could link to a GitHub repository with the source code.
Under certain circumstances, you can include a written offer to provide the corresponding source code. This written offer must be valid for at least three years, sometimes longer. You must then provide the software to anyone who contacts you with a copy of that offer, not just to those to whom you gave the software directly.
- If you only distribute the software “occasionally and noncommercially” in unmodified form, you can also pass along a copy of a written offer that you received.
- You can satisfy a written offer either by providing the source code on a physical medium (you may charge postage etc), or by offering the source code for download.
Under no circumstances can you charge any fees for the source code itself.
What do you mean by "sometimes longer" for the written offer?
– Brandin
7 hours ago
1
@Brandin The “certain circumstances” where GPLv3 allows written offers are physical products, and the written offer must be honored “for at least three years and […] for as long as you offer spare parts or customer support for that product model”.
– amon
6 hours ago
I don't understand the part that says "Under no circumstances can you charge any fees for the source code itself." What if the code itself is the product itself? For example when dealing with a Javascript component for the web? Or a HTML template? Or a PHP script? There's no compilation there at all. The code is all developers need to use it.
– Alvaro
2 hours ago
add a comment
|
To any recipients. You do not have to make the source code available to the public, but have to provide the source code to anyone who received the software from you.
The details here depend on how you want to provide the source code (see section 6 of the GPLv3):
The easiest way is to always bundle the corresponding source code when you give someone a copy of the software.
If you offer the software for download, you can also offer the corresponding source for download at the same place. For example, any places where you offer your app could link to a GitHub repository with the source code.
Under certain circumstances, you can include a written offer to provide the corresponding source code. This written offer must be valid for at least three years, sometimes longer. You must then provide the software to anyone who contacts you with a copy of that offer, not just to those to whom you gave the software directly.
- If you only distribute the software “occasionally and noncommercially” in unmodified form, you can also pass along a copy of a written offer that you received.
- You can satisfy a written offer either by providing the source code on a physical medium (you may charge postage etc), or by offering the source code for download.
Under no circumstances can you charge any fees for the source code itself.
To any recipients. You do not have to make the source code available to the public, but have to provide the source code to anyone who received the software from you.
The details here depend on how you want to provide the source code (see section 6 of the GPLv3):
The easiest way is to always bundle the corresponding source code when you give someone a copy of the software.
If you offer the software for download, you can also offer the corresponding source for download at the same place. For example, any places where you offer your app could link to a GitHub repository with the source code.
Under certain circumstances, you can include a written offer to provide the corresponding source code. This written offer must be valid for at least three years, sometimes longer. You must then provide the software to anyone who contacts you with a copy of that offer, not just to those to whom you gave the software directly.
- If you only distribute the software “occasionally and noncommercially” in unmodified form, you can also pass along a copy of a written offer that you received.
- You can satisfy a written offer either by providing the source code on a physical medium (you may charge postage etc), or by offering the source code for download.
Under no circumstances can you charge any fees for the source code itself.
answered 8 hours ago
amonamon
16k1 gold badge19 silver badges42 bronze badges
16k1 gold badge19 silver badges42 bronze badges
What do you mean by "sometimes longer" for the written offer?
– Brandin
7 hours ago
1
@Brandin The “certain circumstances” where GPLv3 allows written offers are physical products, and the written offer must be honored “for at least three years and […] for as long as you offer spare parts or customer support for that product model”.
– amon
6 hours ago
I don't understand the part that says "Under no circumstances can you charge any fees for the source code itself." What if the code itself is the product itself? For example when dealing with a Javascript component for the web? Or a HTML template? Or a PHP script? There's no compilation there at all. The code is all developers need to use it.
– Alvaro
2 hours ago
add a comment
|
What do you mean by "sometimes longer" for the written offer?
– Brandin
7 hours ago
1
@Brandin The “certain circumstances” where GPLv3 allows written offers are physical products, and the written offer must be honored “for at least three years and […] for as long as you offer spare parts or customer support for that product model”.
– amon
6 hours ago
I don't understand the part that says "Under no circumstances can you charge any fees for the source code itself." What if the code itself is the product itself? For example when dealing with a Javascript component for the web? Or a HTML template? Or a PHP script? There's no compilation there at all. The code is all developers need to use it.
– Alvaro
2 hours ago
What do you mean by "sometimes longer" for the written offer?
– Brandin
7 hours ago
What do you mean by "sometimes longer" for the written offer?
– Brandin
7 hours ago
1
1
@Brandin The “certain circumstances” where GPLv3 allows written offers are physical products, and the written offer must be honored “for at least three years and […] for as long as you offer spare parts or customer support for that product model”.
– amon
6 hours ago
@Brandin The “certain circumstances” where GPLv3 allows written offers are physical products, and the written offer must be honored “for at least three years and […] for as long as you offer spare parts or customer support for that product model”.
– amon
6 hours ago
I don't understand the part that says "Under no circumstances can you charge any fees for the source code itself." What if the code itself is the product itself? For example when dealing with a Javascript component for the web? Or a HTML template? Or a PHP script? There's no compilation there at all. The code is all developers need to use it.
– Alvaro
2 hours ago
I don't understand the part that says "Under no circumstances can you charge any fees for the source code itself." What if the code itself is the product itself? For example when dealing with a Javascript component for the web? Or a HTML template? Or a PHP script? There's no compilation there at all. The code is all developers need to use it.
– Alvaro
2 hours ago
add a comment
|
Thanks for contributing an answer to Open Source Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fopensource.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f8836%2fgplv3-forces-us-to-make-code-available-but-to-who%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
You only have to give the source code to the people you sell your software to. However, the GPL allows those recipients to give it to anyone else for free.
– Brandin
7 hours ago
@Brandin: minor nitpick - "... people you distribute your software to." The person you gave a free trial or beta-test copy to is also entitled to the source code, the same as the the person who paid money to buy it from you.
– Stobor
1 hour ago