algebra permutationsElement of Largest Order in $S_n$Permutation Group NotationSome naive questions about...

SSD or HDD for server

How much income am I getting by renting my house?

How to respond when insulted by a grad student in a different department?

Are there any rules around when something can be described as "based on a true story"?

Which collation should I use for biblical Hebrew?

Is it reasonable to ask candidates to create a profile on Google Scholar?

Is Having my Players Control Two Parties a Good Idea?

Is it plausible that an interrupted Windows update can cause the motherboard to fail?

Why are seats at the rear of a plane sometimes unavailable even though many other seats are available in the plane?

Having trouble with accidentals - Note-for-note vs traditional?

Why does English employ double possessive pronouns such as theirs and ours?

If the music alphabet had more than 7 letters would octaves still sound like the same note?

Would a physician with migraine better treat their patients?

Big Bracket for equations

Is it realistic that an advanced species isn't good at war?

What are the consequences for downstream actors of redistributing a work under a wider CC license than the copyright holder authorized?

Variable fixing based on a good feasible solution

String Operation to Split on Punctuation

Do you say "good game" after a game in which your opponent played poorly?

An idiomatic word for "very little" in this context?

Reading an LP/MPS file using Pyomo software

The colors in Resident Evil 7 are *completely* off

Display ESRI MapService (WMTS) with EPSG:28992 coordinate system in OpenLayers web map with OpenStreetMap base layer

Can the bass be used instead of drums?



algebra permutations


Element of Largest Order in $S_n$Permutation Group NotationSome naive questions about embeddingsStabilizers of permutationsPrimitive Element theorem, permutationsNumber of permutations with given cyclic structureLinear Algebra question on permutationsNumber of Even Permutations $p$ such that $pqp^{-1}=q$Absract Algebra: PermutationsEquivalence relation on $S_n$ involving algebraic permutations






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{
margin-bottom:0;
}
.everyonelovesstackoverflow{position:absolute;height:1px;width:1px;opacity:0;top:0;left:0;pointer-events:none;}








3














$begingroup$


Ok, this is rather a question than a problem. So, if we have $sigma:in S_n$ a permutation, why there is a natural number, say $p$, such that $sigma^p=e$, where $e$ is the identical permutation?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • 1




    $begingroup$
    It would improve your posts of Questions to work out an example or two, so that you can provide Readers with a better indication of where you got with understanding the underlying mechanism, e.g. in this case taking a power of a permutation of $n$ things.
    $endgroup$
    – hardmath
    8 hours ago


















3














$begingroup$


Ok, this is rather a question than a problem. So, if we have $sigma:in S_n$ a permutation, why there is a natural number, say $p$, such that $sigma^p=e$, where $e$ is the identical permutation?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • 1




    $begingroup$
    It would improve your posts of Questions to work out an example or two, so that you can provide Readers with a better indication of where you got with understanding the underlying mechanism, e.g. in this case taking a power of a permutation of $n$ things.
    $endgroup$
    – hardmath
    8 hours ago














3












3








3


1



$begingroup$


Ok, this is rather a question than a problem. So, if we have $sigma:in S_n$ a permutation, why there is a natural number, say $p$, such that $sigma^p=e$, where $e$ is the identical permutation?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




Ok, this is rather a question than a problem. So, if we have $sigma:in S_n$ a permutation, why there is a natural number, say $p$, such that $sigma^p=e$, where $e$ is the identical permutation?







abstract-algebra






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question



share|cite|improve this question










asked 8 hours ago









NumbersNumbers

1616 bronze badges




1616 bronze badges











  • 1




    $begingroup$
    It would improve your posts of Questions to work out an example or two, so that you can provide Readers with a better indication of where you got with understanding the underlying mechanism, e.g. in this case taking a power of a permutation of $n$ things.
    $endgroup$
    – hardmath
    8 hours ago














  • 1




    $begingroup$
    It would improve your posts of Questions to work out an example or two, so that you can provide Readers with a better indication of where you got with understanding the underlying mechanism, e.g. in this case taking a power of a permutation of $n$ things.
    $endgroup$
    – hardmath
    8 hours ago








1




1




$begingroup$
It would improve your posts of Questions to work out an example or two, so that you can provide Readers with a better indication of where you got with understanding the underlying mechanism, e.g. in this case taking a power of a permutation of $n$ things.
$endgroup$
– hardmath
8 hours ago




$begingroup$
It would improve your posts of Questions to work out an example or two, so that you can provide Readers with a better indication of where you got with understanding the underlying mechanism, e.g. in this case taking a power of a permutation of $n$ things.
$endgroup$
– hardmath
8 hours ago










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















4
















$begingroup$

In any finite group every element has finite order by Lagrange. Hence for every $sigmain S_n$ there exists a $p$ such that $sigma ^p=id$. However, the largest possible order of an element in $S_n$ is much smaller than the group order, see here:



Element of Largest Order in $S_n$






share|cite|improve this answer










$endgroup$















  • $begingroup$
    yeah, ok, I forgot to mention that I don t now group theory.
    $endgroup$
    – Numbers
    8 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Lagrange is at the very beginning of group theory, and you don't have to know group theory for it.
    $endgroup$
    – Dietrich Burde
    7 hours ago



















0
















$begingroup$

The set $${sigma,sigma^2, sigma^3,...}$$ is finite so at some points we have $sigma ^m=sigma^n$



That is $$sigma ^{m-n}=e$$






share|cite|improve this answer










$endgroup$























    0
















    $begingroup$

    One more methodical idea is the following:



    Let $sigma = (a_1a_2dots a_k)$. Consider $$sigma^k = (a_1a_2dots a_k)(a_1a_2dots a_k)cdots (a_1a_2dots a_k).$$ Then
    begin{align}
    a_1 to a_2 to &cdots to a_k to a_1,\
    a_2 to a_3 to &cdots to a_1 to a_2,\
    &;; vdots\
    a_k to a_1 to &cdots to a_1 to a_k,
    end{align}

    sending every $a_i$ to itself. Think of this as sort of chaining together $a_i to a_{i+1}, a_{i+1} to a_{i+2},dots$.



    An explicit example: If we have $(123)^3 = (123)(123)(123)$, then
    begin{align}
    1 to 2 to 3 to 1\
    2 to 3 to 1 to 2\
    3 to 1 to 2 to 3
    end{align}






    share|cite|improve this answer










    $endgroup$

















      Your Answer








      StackExchange.ready(function() {
      var channelOptions = {
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "69"
      };
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
      createEditor();
      });
      }
      else {
      createEditor();
      }
      });

      function createEditor() {
      StackExchange.prepareEditor({
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: true,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: 10,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader: {
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/"u003ecc by-sa 4.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      },
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      });


      }
      });















      draft saved

      draft discarded
















      StackExchange.ready(
      function () {
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3381779%2falgebra-permutations%23new-answer', 'question_page');
      }
      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown


























      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes








      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      4
















      $begingroup$

      In any finite group every element has finite order by Lagrange. Hence for every $sigmain S_n$ there exists a $p$ such that $sigma ^p=id$. However, the largest possible order of an element in $S_n$ is much smaller than the group order, see here:



      Element of Largest Order in $S_n$






      share|cite|improve this answer










      $endgroup$















      • $begingroup$
        yeah, ok, I forgot to mention that I don t now group theory.
        $endgroup$
        – Numbers
        8 hours ago










      • $begingroup$
        Lagrange is at the very beginning of group theory, and you don't have to know group theory for it.
        $endgroup$
        – Dietrich Burde
        7 hours ago
















      4
















      $begingroup$

      In any finite group every element has finite order by Lagrange. Hence for every $sigmain S_n$ there exists a $p$ such that $sigma ^p=id$. However, the largest possible order of an element in $S_n$ is much smaller than the group order, see here:



      Element of Largest Order in $S_n$






      share|cite|improve this answer










      $endgroup$















      • $begingroup$
        yeah, ok, I forgot to mention that I don t now group theory.
        $endgroup$
        – Numbers
        8 hours ago










      • $begingroup$
        Lagrange is at the very beginning of group theory, and you don't have to know group theory for it.
        $endgroup$
        – Dietrich Burde
        7 hours ago














      4














      4










      4







      $begingroup$

      In any finite group every element has finite order by Lagrange. Hence for every $sigmain S_n$ there exists a $p$ such that $sigma ^p=id$. However, the largest possible order of an element in $S_n$ is much smaller than the group order, see here:



      Element of Largest Order in $S_n$






      share|cite|improve this answer










      $endgroup$



      In any finite group every element has finite order by Lagrange. Hence for every $sigmain S_n$ there exists a $p$ such that $sigma ^p=id$. However, the largest possible order of an element in $S_n$ is much smaller than the group order, see here:



      Element of Largest Order in $S_n$







      share|cite|improve this answer













      share|cite|improve this answer




      share|cite|improve this answer



      share|cite|improve this answer










      answered 8 hours ago









      Dietrich BurdeDietrich Burde

      88k6 gold badges50 silver badges111 bronze badges




      88k6 gold badges50 silver badges111 bronze badges















      • $begingroup$
        yeah, ok, I forgot to mention that I don t now group theory.
        $endgroup$
        – Numbers
        8 hours ago










      • $begingroup$
        Lagrange is at the very beginning of group theory, and you don't have to know group theory for it.
        $endgroup$
        – Dietrich Burde
        7 hours ago


















      • $begingroup$
        yeah, ok, I forgot to mention that I don t now group theory.
        $endgroup$
        – Numbers
        8 hours ago










      • $begingroup$
        Lagrange is at the very beginning of group theory, and you don't have to know group theory for it.
        $endgroup$
        – Dietrich Burde
        7 hours ago
















      $begingroup$
      yeah, ok, I forgot to mention that I don t now group theory.
      $endgroup$
      – Numbers
      8 hours ago




      $begingroup$
      yeah, ok, I forgot to mention that I don t now group theory.
      $endgroup$
      – Numbers
      8 hours ago












      $begingroup$
      Lagrange is at the very beginning of group theory, and you don't have to know group theory for it.
      $endgroup$
      – Dietrich Burde
      7 hours ago




      $begingroup$
      Lagrange is at the very beginning of group theory, and you don't have to know group theory for it.
      $endgroup$
      – Dietrich Burde
      7 hours ago













      0
















      $begingroup$

      The set $${sigma,sigma^2, sigma^3,...}$$ is finite so at some points we have $sigma ^m=sigma^n$



      That is $$sigma ^{m-n}=e$$






      share|cite|improve this answer










      $endgroup$




















        0
















        $begingroup$

        The set $${sigma,sigma^2, sigma^3,...}$$ is finite so at some points we have $sigma ^m=sigma^n$



        That is $$sigma ^{m-n}=e$$






        share|cite|improve this answer










        $endgroup$


















          0














          0










          0







          $begingroup$

          The set $${sigma,sigma^2, sigma^3,...}$$ is finite so at some points we have $sigma ^m=sigma^n$



          That is $$sigma ^{m-n}=e$$






          share|cite|improve this answer










          $endgroup$



          The set $${sigma,sigma^2, sigma^3,...}$$ is finite so at some points we have $sigma ^m=sigma^n$



          That is $$sigma ^{m-n}=e$$







          share|cite|improve this answer













          share|cite|improve this answer




          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered 8 hours ago









          Mohammad Riazi-KermaniMohammad Riazi-Kermani

          54.4k4 gold badges27 silver badges74 bronze badges




          54.4k4 gold badges27 silver badges74 bronze badges


























              0
















              $begingroup$

              One more methodical idea is the following:



              Let $sigma = (a_1a_2dots a_k)$. Consider $$sigma^k = (a_1a_2dots a_k)(a_1a_2dots a_k)cdots (a_1a_2dots a_k).$$ Then
              begin{align}
              a_1 to a_2 to &cdots to a_k to a_1,\
              a_2 to a_3 to &cdots to a_1 to a_2,\
              &;; vdots\
              a_k to a_1 to &cdots to a_1 to a_k,
              end{align}

              sending every $a_i$ to itself. Think of this as sort of chaining together $a_i to a_{i+1}, a_{i+1} to a_{i+2},dots$.



              An explicit example: If we have $(123)^3 = (123)(123)(123)$, then
              begin{align}
              1 to 2 to 3 to 1\
              2 to 3 to 1 to 2\
              3 to 1 to 2 to 3
              end{align}






              share|cite|improve this answer










              $endgroup$




















                0
















                $begingroup$

                One more methodical idea is the following:



                Let $sigma = (a_1a_2dots a_k)$. Consider $$sigma^k = (a_1a_2dots a_k)(a_1a_2dots a_k)cdots (a_1a_2dots a_k).$$ Then
                begin{align}
                a_1 to a_2 to &cdots to a_k to a_1,\
                a_2 to a_3 to &cdots to a_1 to a_2,\
                &;; vdots\
                a_k to a_1 to &cdots to a_1 to a_k,
                end{align}

                sending every $a_i$ to itself. Think of this as sort of chaining together $a_i to a_{i+1}, a_{i+1} to a_{i+2},dots$.



                An explicit example: If we have $(123)^3 = (123)(123)(123)$, then
                begin{align}
                1 to 2 to 3 to 1\
                2 to 3 to 1 to 2\
                3 to 1 to 2 to 3
                end{align}






                share|cite|improve this answer










                $endgroup$


















                  0














                  0










                  0







                  $begingroup$

                  One more methodical idea is the following:



                  Let $sigma = (a_1a_2dots a_k)$. Consider $$sigma^k = (a_1a_2dots a_k)(a_1a_2dots a_k)cdots (a_1a_2dots a_k).$$ Then
                  begin{align}
                  a_1 to a_2 to &cdots to a_k to a_1,\
                  a_2 to a_3 to &cdots to a_1 to a_2,\
                  &;; vdots\
                  a_k to a_1 to &cdots to a_1 to a_k,
                  end{align}

                  sending every $a_i$ to itself. Think of this as sort of chaining together $a_i to a_{i+1}, a_{i+1} to a_{i+2},dots$.



                  An explicit example: If we have $(123)^3 = (123)(123)(123)$, then
                  begin{align}
                  1 to 2 to 3 to 1\
                  2 to 3 to 1 to 2\
                  3 to 1 to 2 to 3
                  end{align}






                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  $endgroup$



                  One more methodical idea is the following:



                  Let $sigma = (a_1a_2dots a_k)$. Consider $$sigma^k = (a_1a_2dots a_k)(a_1a_2dots a_k)cdots (a_1a_2dots a_k).$$ Then
                  begin{align}
                  a_1 to a_2 to &cdots to a_k to a_1,\
                  a_2 to a_3 to &cdots to a_1 to a_2,\
                  &;; vdots\
                  a_k to a_1 to &cdots to a_1 to a_k,
                  end{align}

                  sending every $a_i$ to itself. Think of this as sort of chaining together $a_i to a_{i+1}, a_{i+1} to a_{i+2},dots$.



                  An explicit example: If we have $(123)^3 = (123)(123)(123)$, then
                  begin{align}
                  1 to 2 to 3 to 1\
                  2 to 3 to 1 to 2\
                  3 to 1 to 2 to 3
                  end{align}







                  share|cite|improve this answer













                  share|cite|improve this answer




                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  answered 8 hours ago









                  HendrixHendrix

                  4414 silver badges15 bronze badges




                  4414 silver badges15 bronze badges


































                      draft saved

                      draft discarded



















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function () {
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3381779%2falgebra-permutations%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                      }
                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown









                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Hudson River Historic District Contents Geography History The district today Aesthetics Cultural...

                      The number designs the writing. Feandra Aversely Definition: The act of ingrafting a sprig or shoot of one...

                      Ayherre Geografie Demografie Externe links Navigatiemenu43° 23′ NB, 1° 15′ WL43° 23′ NB, 1°...