when did apt or apttitude or apt-get start supporting of last two releases for migration purposesWhy did...
simple conditions equation
Is it possible to determine the symmetric encryption method used by output size?
Rivers without rain
Please, smoke with good manners
What does the "ep" capability mean?
With a Canadian student visa, can I spend a night at Vancouver before continuing to Toronto?
What are the potential pitfalls when using metals as a currency?
Does holding a wand and speaking its command word count as V/S/M spell components?
Realistic Necromancy?
Combinable filters
How can I place the product on a social media post better?
How exactly does Hawking radiation decrease the mass of black holes?
Is there really no use for MD5 anymore?
Was there a shared-world project before "Thieves World"?
Contradiction proof for inequality of P and NP?
How did Captain America manage to do this?
What is the most expensive material in the world that could be used to create Pun-Pun's lute?
Why do games have consumables?
How to reduce LED flash rate (frequency)
Phrase for the opposite of "foolproof"
What route did the Hindenburg take when traveling from Germany to the U.S.?
What is the difference between `command a[bc]d` and `command `a{b,c}d`
Do I have to worry about players making “bad” choices on level up?
Are Boeing 737-800’s grounded?
when did apt or apttitude or apt-get start supporting of last two releases for migration purposes
Why did 'apt-get install ffmpeg' fail?Hard drive partition and updating troubleKeep private key for remote reprepro package archive localFind out what 'apt-get install' didBypass GPG signature checks only for a single repositoryapt-get keeps failingIs there a corresponding mechanism to secure apt for FreeBSD?Using Centos to sign .deb packagesHow can a public key contain several public keys with GPG (or what am I doing wrong)?Debian 8 Jessie errors on all MariaDB mirrors : Signature by key 199369E5404BD5FC7D2FE43BCBCB082A1BB943DB uses weak digest algorithm (SHA1)
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}
I was playing with my Debian install today and discovered an interesting thing. If I do for e.g.
$ apt-key list
/etc/apt/trusted.gpg
--------------------
pub rsa4096 2019-04-15 [SC] [expires: 2024-04-13]
12D4 CD60 0C22 40A9 F4A8 2071 D7B0 B669 41D0 1538
uid [ unknown] riot.im packages <packages@riot.im>
sub rsa3072 2019-04-15 [S] [expires: 2021-04-14]
pub rsa4096 2019-04-15 [SC] [expires: 2024-04-13]
AAF9 AE84 3A75 84B5 A3E4 CD2B CF45 A512 DE2D A058
uid [ unknown] matrix.org packages <packages@matrix.org>
sub rsa3072 2019-04-15 [S] [expires: 2021-04-14]
pub rsa4096 2017-05-22 [SC] [expires: 2025-05-20]
E1CF 20DD FFE4 B89E 8026 58F1 E0B1 1894 F66A EC98
uid [ unknown] Debian Archive Automatic Signing Key (9/stretch) <ftpmaster@debian.org>
sub rsa4096 2017-05-22 [S] [expires: 2025-05-20]
pub rsa4096 2014-11-21 [SC] [expires: 2022-11-19]
D211 6914 1CEC D440 F2EB 8DDA 9D6D 8F6B C857 C906
uid [ unknown] Debian Security Archive Automatic Signing Key (8/jessie) <ftpmaster@debian.org>
/etc/apt/trusted.gpg.d/debian-archive-buster-automatic.gpg
----------------------------------------------------------
pub rsa4096 2019-04-14 [SC] [expires: 2027-04-12]
80D1 5823 B7FD 1561 F9F7 BCDD DC30 D7C2 3CBB ABEE
uid [ unknown] Debian Archive Automatic Signing Key (10/buster) <ftpmaster@debian.org>
sub rsa4096 2019-04-14 [S] [expires: 2027-04-12]
/etc/apt/trusted.gpg.d/debian-archive-buster-security-automatic.gpg
-------------------------------------------------------------------
pub rsa4096 2019-04-14 [SC] [expires: 2027-04-12]
5E61 B217 265D A980 7A23 C5FF 4DFA B270 CAA9 6DFA
uid [ unknown] Debian Security Archive Automatic Signing Key (10/buster) <ftpmaster@debian.org>
sub rsa4096 2019-04-14 [S] [expires: 2027-04-12]
/etc/apt/trusted.gpg.d/debian-archive-buster-stable.gpg
-------------------------------------------------------
pub rsa4096 2019-02-05 [SC] [expires: 2027-02-03]
6D33 866E DD8F FA41 C014 3AED DCC9 EFBF 77E1 1517
uid [ unknown] Debian Stable Release Key (10/buster) <debian-release@lists.debian.org>
I was curious as to why it has jessie and stretch keys when I am using debian-buster. In the above these are the two keys -
pub rsa4096 2017-05-22 [SC] [expires: 2025-05-20]
E1CF 20DD FFE4 B89E 8026 58F1 E0B1 1894 F66A EC98
uid [ unknown] Debian Archive Automatic Signing Key (9/stretch) <ftpmaster@debian.org>
sub rsa4096 2017-05-22 [S] [expires: 2025-05-20]
pub rsa4096 2014-11-21 [SC] [expires: 2022-11-19]
D211 6914 1CEC D440 F2EB 8DDA 9D6D 8F6B C857 C906
uid [ unknown] Debian Security Archive Automatic Signing Key (8/jessie) <ftpmaster@debian.org>
I removed the keys using -
$ sudo apt-key del E1CF20DDFFE4B89E802658F1E0B11894F66AEC98
as well as -
$ sudo apt-key del D21169141CECD440F2EB8DDA9D6D8F6BC857C906
when both the keys were deleted I got pub keys errors and had to import them using gpg ( I know it's insecure but had to do -)
# gpg --recv-keys AA8E81B4331F7F50
gpg: key EDA0D2388AE22BA9: 11 signatures not checked due to missing keys
gpg: key EDA0D2388AE22BA9: public key "Debian Security Archive Automatic Signing Key (9/stretch) <ftpmaster@debian.org>" imported
gpg: no ultimately trusted keys found
gpg: Total number processed: 1
gpg: imported: 1
and then -
# gpg --export AA8E81B4331F7F50 | apt-key add
OK
I am curious to know when did apt start supporting signatures of old releases alongwith the newest keys ? Is it somewhat of a recent phenomena or a really old phenomena ? I mean whether it was done in Etch (4.0) or later ?
debian apt history
edited 1 min ago
Jeff Schaller♦
45.5k1165148
asked 59 mins ago
shirishshirish
3,91073692
add a comment |
I was playing with my Debian install today and discovered an interesting thing. If I do for e.g.
$ apt-key list
/etc/apt/trusted.gpg
--------------------
pub rsa4096 2019-04-15 [SC] [expires: 2024-04-13]
12D4 CD60 0C22 40A9 F4A8 2071 D7B0 B669 41D0 1538
uid [ unknown] riot.im packages <packages@riot.im>
sub rsa3072 2019-04-15 [S] [expires: 2021-04-14]
pub rsa4096 2019-04-15 [SC] [expires: 2024-04-13]
AAF9 AE84 3A75 84B5 A3E4 CD2B CF45 A512 DE2D A058
uid [ unknown] matrix.org packages <packages@matrix.org>
sub rsa3072 2019-04-15 [S] [expires: 2021-04-14]
pub rsa4096 2017-05-22 [SC] [expires: 2025-05-20]
E1CF 20DD FFE4 B89E 8026 58F1 E0B1 1894 F66A EC98
uid [ unknown] Debian Archive Automatic Signing Key (9/stretch) <ftpmaster@debian.org>
sub rsa4096 2017-05-22 [S] [expires: 2025-05-20]
pub rsa4096 2014-11-21 [SC] [expires: 2022-11-19]
D211 6914 1CEC D440 F2EB 8DDA 9D6D 8F6B C857 C906
uid [ unknown] Debian Security Archive Automatic Signing Key (8/jessie) <ftpmaster@debian.org>
/etc/apt/trusted.gpg.d/debian-archive-buster-automatic.gpg
----------------------------------------------------------
pub rsa4096 2019-04-14 [SC] [expires: 2027-04-12]
80D1 5823 B7FD 1561 F9F7 BCDD DC30 D7C2 3CBB ABEE
uid [ unknown] Debian Archive Automatic Signing Key (10/buster) <ftpmaster@debian.org>
sub rsa4096 2019-04-14 [S] [expires: 2027-04-12]
/etc/apt/trusted.gpg.d/debian-archive-buster-security-automatic.gpg
-------------------------------------------------------------------
pub rsa4096 2019-04-14 [SC] [expires: 2027-04-12]
5E61 B217 265D A980 7A23 C5FF 4DFA B270 CAA9 6DFA
uid [ unknown] Debian Security Archive Automatic Signing Key (10/buster) <ftpmaster@debian.org>
sub rsa4096 2019-04-14 [S] [expires: 2027-04-12]
/etc/apt/trusted.gpg.d/debian-archive-buster-stable.gpg
-------------------------------------------------------
pub rsa4096 2019-02-05 [SC] [expires: 2027-02-03]
6D33 866E DD8F FA41 C014 3AED DCC9 EFBF 77E1 1517
uid [ unknown] Debian Stable Release Key (10/buster) <debian-release@lists.debian.org>
I was curious as to why it has jessie and stretch keys when I am using debian-buster. In the above these are the two keys -
pub rsa4096 2017-05-22 [SC] [expires: 2025-05-20]
E1CF 20DD FFE4 B89E 8026 58F1 E0B1 1894 F66A EC98
uid [ unknown] Debian Archive Automatic Signing Key (9/stretch) <ftpmaster@debian.org>
sub rsa4096 2017-05-22 [S] [expires: 2025-05-20]
pub rsa4096 2014-11-21 [SC] [expires: 2022-11-19]
D211 6914 1CEC D440 F2EB 8DDA 9D6D 8F6B C857 C906
uid [ unknown] Debian Security Archive Automatic Signing Key (8/jessie) <ftpmaster@debian.org>
I removed the keys using -
$ sudo apt-key del E1CF20DDFFE4B89E802658F1E0B11894F66AEC98
as well as -
$ sudo apt-key del D21169141CECD440F2EB8DDA9D6D8F6BC857C906
when both the keys were deleted I got pub keys errors and had to import them using gpg ( I know it's insecure but had to do -)
# gpg --recv-keys AA8E81B4331F7F50
gpg: key EDA0D2388AE22BA9: 11 signatures not checked due to missing keys
gpg: key EDA0D2388AE22BA9: public key "Debian Security Archive Automatic Signing Key (9/stretch) <ftpmaster@debian.org>" imported
gpg: no ultimately trusted keys found
gpg: Total number processed: 1
gpg: imported: 1
and then -
# gpg --export AA8E81B4331F7F50 | apt-key add
OK
I am curious to know when did apt start supporting signatures of old releases alongwith the newest keys ? Is it somewhat of a recent phenomena or a really old phenomena ? I mean whether it was done in Etch (4.0) or later ?
debian apt history
edited 1 min ago
Jeff Schaller♦
45.5k1165148
asked 59 mins ago
shirishshirish
3,91073692
add a comment |
I was playing with my Debian install today and discovered an interesting thing. If I do for e.g.
$ apt-key list
/etc/apt/trusted.gpg
--------------------
pub rsa4096 2019-04-15 [SC] [expires: 2024-04-13]
12D4 CD60 0C22 40A9 F4A8 2071 D7B0 B669 41D0 1538
uid [ unknown] riot.im packages <packages@riot.im>
sub rsa3072 2019-04-15 [S] [expires: 2021-04-14]
pub rsa4096 2019-04-15 [SC] [expires: 2024-04-13]
AAF9 AE84 3A75 84B5 A3E4 CD2B CF45 A512 DE2D A058
uid [ unknown] matrix.org packages <packages@matrix.org>
sub rsa3072 2019-04-15 [S] [expires: 2021-04-14]
pub rsa4096 2017-05-22 [SC] [expires: 2025-05-20]
E1CF 20DD FFE4 B89E 8026 58F1 E0B1 1894 F66A EC98
uid [ unknown] Debian Archive Automatic Signing Key (9/stretch) <ftpmaster@debian.org>
sub rsa4096 2017-05-22 [S] [expires: 2025-05-20]
pub rsa4096 2014-11-21 [SC] [expires: 2022-11-19]
D211 6914 1CEC D440 F2EB 8DDA 9D6D 8F6B C857 C906
uid [ unknown] Debian Security Archive Automatic Signing Key (8/jessie) <ftpmaster@debian.org>
/etc/apt/trusted.gpg.d/debian-archive-buster-automatic.gpg
----------------------------------------------------------
pub rsa4096 2019-04-14 [SC] [expires: 2027-04-12]
80D1 5823 B7FD 1561 F9F7 BCDD DC30 D7C2 3CBB ABEE
uid [ unknown] Debian Archive Automatic Signing Key (10/buster) <ftpmaster@debian.org>
sub rsa4096 2019-04-14 [S] [expires: 2027-04-12]
/etc/apt/trusted.gpg.d/debian-archive-buster-security-automatic.gpg
-------------------------------------------------------------------
pub rsa4096 2019-04-14 [SC] [expires: 2027-04-12]
5E61 B217 265D A980 7A23 C5FF 4DFA B270 CAA9 6DFA
uid [ unknown] Debian Security Archive Automatic Signing Key (10/buster) <ftpmaster@debian.org>
sub rsa4096 2019-04-14 [S] [expires: 2027-04-12]
/etc/apt/trusted.gpg.d/debian-archive-buster-stable.gpg
-------------------------------------------------------
pub rsa4096 2019-02-05 [SC] [expires: 2027-02-03]
6D33 866E DD8F FA41 C014 3AED DCC9 EFBF 77E1 1517
uid [ unknown] Debian Stable Release Key (10/buster) <debian-release@lists.debian.org>
I was curious as to why it has jessie and stretch keys when I am using debian-buster. In the above these are the two keys -
pub rsa4096 2017-05-22 [SC] [expires: 2025-05-20]
E1CF 20DD FFE4 B89E 8026 58F1 E0B1 1894 F66A EC98
uid [ unknown] Debian Archive Automatic Signing Key (9/stretch) <ftpmaster@debian.org>
sub rsa4096 2017-05-22 [S] [expires: 2025-05-20]
pub rsa4096 2014-11-21 [SC] [expires: 2022-11-19]
D211 6914 1CEC D440 F2EB 8DDA 9D6D 8F6B C857 C906
uid [ unknown] Debian Security Archive Automatic Signing Key (8/jessie) <ftpmaster@debian.org>
I removed the keys using -
$ sudo apt-key del E1CF20DDFFE4B89E802658F1E0B11894F66AEC98
as well as -
$ sudo apt-key del D21169141CECD440F2EB8DDA9D6D8F6BC857C906
when both the keys were deleted I got pub keys errors and had to import them using gpg ( I know it's insecure but had to do -)
# gpg --recv-keys AA8E81B4331F7F50
gpg: key EDA0D2388AE22BA9: 11 signatures not checked due to missing keys
gpg: key EDA0D2388AE22BA9: public key "Debian Security Archive Automatic Signing Key (9/stretch) <ftpmaster@debian.org>" imported
gpg: no ultimately trusted keys found
gpg: Total number processed: 1
gpg: imported: 1
and then -
# gpg --export AA8E81B4331F7F50 | apt-key add
OK
I am curious to know when did apt start supporting signatures of old releases alongwith the newest keys ? Is it somewhat of a recent phenomena or a really old phenomena ? I mean whether it was done in Etch (4.0) or later ?
debian apt history
edited 1 min ago
Jeff Schaller♦
45.5k1165148
asked 59 mins ago
shirishshirish
3,91073692
I was playing with my Debian install today and discovered an interesting thing. If I do for e.g.
$ apt-key list
/etc/apt/trusted.gpg
--------------------
pub rsa4096 2019-04-15 [SC] [expires: 2024-04-13]
12D4 CD60 0C22 40A9 F4A8 2071 D7B0 B669 41D0 1538
uid [ unknown] riot.im packages <packages@riot.im>
sub rsa3072 2019-04-15 [S] [expires: 2021-04-14]
pub rsa4096 2019-04-15 [SC] [expires: 2024-04-13]
AAF9 AE84 3A75 84B5 A3E4 CD2B CF45 A512 DE2D A058
uid [ unknown] matrix.org packages <packages@matrix.org>
sub rsa3072 2019-04-15 [S] [expires: 2021-04-14]
pub rsa4096 2017-05-22 [SC] [expires: 2025-05-20]
E1CF 20DD FFE4 B89E 8026 58F1 E0B1 1894 F66A EC98
uid [ unknown] Debian Archive Automatic Signing Key (9/stretch) <ftpmaster@debian.org>
sub rsa4096 2017-05-22 [S] [expires: 2025-05-20]
pub rsa4096 2014-11-21 [SC] [expires: 2022-11-19]
D211 6914 1CEC D440 F2EB 8DDA 9D6D 8F6B C857 C906
uid [ unknown] Debian Security Archive Automatic Signing Key (8/jessie) <ftpmaster@debian.org>
/etc/apt/trusted.gpg.d/debian-archive-buster-automatic.gpg
----------------------------------------------------------
pub rsa4096 2019-04-14 [SC] [expires: 2027-04-12]
80D1 5823 B7FD 1561 F9F7 BCDD DC30 D7C2 3CBB ABEE
uid [ unknown] Debian Archive Automatic Signing Key (10/buster) <ftpmaster@debian.org>
sub rsa4096 2019-04-14 [S] [expires: 2027-04-12]
/etc/apt/trusted.gpg.d/debian-archive-buster-security-automatic.gpg
-------------------------------------------------------------------
pub rsa4096 2019-04-14 [SC] [expires: 2027-04-12]
5E61 B217 265D A980 7A23 C5FF 4DFA B270 CAA9 6DFA
uid [ unknown] Debian Security Archive Automatic Signing Key (10/buster) <ftpmaster@debian.org>
sub rsa4096 2019-04-14 [S] [expires: 2027-04-12]
/etc/apt/trusted.gpg.d/debian-archive-buster-stable.gpg
-------------------------------------------------------
pub rsa4096 2019-02-05 [SC] [expires: 2027-02-03]
6D33 866E DD8F FA41 C014 3AED DCC9 EFBF 77E1 1517
uid [ unknown] Debian Stable Release Key (10/buster) <debian-release@lists.debian.org>
I was curious as to why it has jessie and stretch keys when I am using debian-buster. In the above these are the two keys -
pub rsa4096 2017-05-22 [SC] [expires: 2025-05-20]
E1CF 20DD FFE4 B89E 8026 58F1 E0B1 1894 F66A EC98
uid [ unknown] Debian Archive Automatic Signing Key (9/stretch) <ftpmaster@debian.org>
sub rsa4096 2017-05-22 [S] [expires: 2025-05-20]
pub rsa4096 2014-11-21 [SC] [expires: 2022-11-19]
D211 6914 1CEC D440 F2EB 8DDA 9D6D 8F6B C857 C906
uid [ unknown] Debian Security Archive Automatic Signing Key (8/jessie) <ftpmaster@debian.org>
I removed the keys using -
$ sudo apt-key del E1CF20DDFFE4B89E802658F1E0B11894F66AEC98
as well as -
$ sudo apt-key del D21169141CECD440F2EB8DDA9D6D8F6BC857C906
when both the keys were deleted I got pub keys errors and had to import them using gpg ( I know it's insecure but had to do -)
# gpg --recv-keys AA8E81B4331F7F50
gpg: key EDA0D2388AE22BA9: 11 signatures not checked due to missing keys
gpg: key EDA0D2388AE22BA9: public key "Debian Security Archive Automatic Signing Key (9/stretch) <ftpmaster@debian.org>" imported
gpg: no ultimately trusted keys found
gpg: Total number processed: 1
gpg: imported: 1
and then -
# gpg --export AA8E81B4331F7F50 | apt-key add
OK
I am curious to know when did apt start supporting signatures of old releases alongwith the newest keys ? Is it somewhat of a recent phenomena or a really old phenomena ? I mean whether it was done in Etch (4.0) or later ?
debian apt history
debian apt history
edited 1 min ago
Jeff Schaller♦
45.5k1165148
asked 59 mins ago
shirishshirish
3,91073692
edited 1 min ago
Jeff Schaller♦
45.5k1165148
asked 59 mins ago
shirishshirish
3,91073692
edited 1 min ago
Jeff Schaller♦
45.5k1165148
edited 1 min ago
Jeff Schaller♦
45.5k1165148
edited 1 min ago
Jeff Schaller♦
45.5k1165148
45.5k1165148
asked 59 mins ago
shirishshirish
3,91073692
asked 59 mins ago
shirishshirish
3,91073692
asked 59 mins ago
shirishshirish
3,91073692
3,91073692
add a comment |
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "106"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f515937%2fwhen-did-apt-or-apttitude-or-apt-get-start-supporting-of-last-two-releases-for-m%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Unix & Linux Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f515937%2fwhen-did-apt-or-apttitude-or-apt-get-start-supporting-of-last-two-releases-for-m%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
