Does Peach's float negate shorthop knockback multipliers?How does move-staling work with bury-throws?How do I...
Looking for an old image of designing a cpu with plan laid out / being edited on a literal floor
Can The Malloreon be read without first reading The Belgariad?
Orientable with respect to complex cobordism?
How do I get a cleat that's stuck in a pedal, detached from the shoe, out?
If a massive object like Jupiter flew past the Earth how close would it need to come to pull people off of the surface?
Why is there a need to modify system call tables in Linux?
What does War Machine's "Canopy! Canopy!" line mean in "Avengers: Endgame"?
Future enhancements for the finite element method
Opposite of "Squeaky wheel gets the grease"
Infinitely many hats
Elegant way to prove congruence
Order by does not work as I expect
Is it possible to kill all life on Earth?
What does it mean by "d-ism of Leibniz" and "dotage of Newton" in simple English?
Select row of data if next row contains zero
Why does my electric oven present the option of 40A and 50A breakers?
Can you use a concentration spell while using Mantle of Majesty?
Should this code fail to compile in C++17?
How do I set the Verbatim font (or the mono font) to bold by default?
Creating Fictional Slavic Place Names
Is there a way to save this session?
The term for the person/group a political party aligns themselves with to appear concerned about the general public
Why don't I have ground wiring on any of my outlets?
Are there mythical creatures in the world of Game of Thrones?
Does Peach's float negate shorthop knockback multipliers?
How does move-staling work with bury-throws?How do I get the shop to refresh, and how often does it refresh?Does playing with a different user active on the Switch create a different file?What does a spirit primary type advantage do?How does the scoring system work for the credits game?What exactly does Wii Fit Trainer's Deep Breathing down special do?What does it mean to “shff fh nair into knee?”
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}
Someone told me that Peach's float allows her to quickly perform full-strength aerials close to the ground in a short hop-like situation. Is this actually the case?
super-smash-bros-ultimate
add a comment |
Someone told me that Peach's float allows her to quickly perform full-strength aerials close to the ground in a short hop-like situation. Is this actually the case?
super-smash-bros-ultimate
If the down-voter wouldn't mind explaining the downvote, I wouldn't mind improving the question.
– Brandon_J
9 hours ago
1
Not the downvoter, but the latter half where it's asking "why does the game not consider..." is towards game dev and design. That is off-topic here
– Wondercricket
9 hours ago
@Wondercricket thanks
– Brandon_J
9 hours ago
add a comment |
Someone told me that Peach's float allows her to quickly perform full-strength aerials close to the ground in a short hop-like situation. Is this actually the case?
super-smash-bros-ultimate
Someone told me that Peach's float allows her to quickly perform full-strength aerials close to the ground in a short hop-like situation. Is this actually the case?
super-smash-bros-ultimate
super-smash-bros-ultimate
edited 9 hours ago
Brandon_J
asked 10 hours ago
Brandon_JBrandon_J
24113
24113
If the down-voter wouldn't mind explaining the downvote, I wouldn't mind improving the question.
– Brandon_J
9 hours ago
1
Not the downvoter, but the latter half where it's asking "why does the game not consider..." is towards game dev and design. That is off-topic here
– Wondercricket
9 hours ago
@Wondercricket thanks
– Brandon_J
9 hours ago
add a comment |
If the down-voter wouldn't mind explaining the downvote, I wouldn't mind improving the question.
– Brandon_J
9 hours ago
1
Not the downvoter, but the latter half where it's asking "why does the game not consider..." is towards game dev and design. That is off-topic here
– Wondercricket
9 hours ago
@Wondercricket thanks
– Brandon_J
9 hours ago
If the down-voter wouldn't mind explaining the downvote, I wouldn't mind improving the question.
– Brandon_J
9 hours ago
If the down-voter wouldn't mind explaining the downvote, I wouldn't mind improving the question.
– Brandon_J
9 hours ago
1
1
Not the downvoter, but the latter half where it's asking "why does the game not consider..." is towards game dev and design. That is off-topic here
– Wondercricket
9 hours ago
Not the downvoter, but the latter half where it's asking "why does the game not consider..." is towards game dev and design. That is off-topic here
– Wondercricket
9 hours ago
@Wondercricket thanks
– Brandon_J
9 hours ago
@Wondercricket thanks
– Brandon_J
9 hours ago
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
To clarify, the short hop multiplier does not directly change knockback. Instead, it lowers the damage of short hop aerials by 15% (to 85%). The knockback is only reduced because it's calculated after the damage, and opponents with less damage get knockbacked less. This is only a small reduction in knockback.
Back to your question, yes, Peach's (and Daisy's) float negates this multiplier. This makes Peach's (and Daisy's) aerials relatively more damaging and with greater shieldstun. They can be performed anywhere in the air, including close to the ground as per this demonstrative video. This same video later highlights the potency of these aerials' increased damage and shieldstun through combos that rack up damage quickly and imply strong shield pressure.
add a comment |
Yes. If Peach (or Daisy) Float Cancel, they’re not affected by the Short Hop Modifier
@MBorg's answer is right on the money. But I'd like to supplement it with some visuals:
Like they explain, for all characters, any aerial performed out of a shorthop will have a .85x damage modifier attached to it. For example, with an un-staled Ganon down-air performed from both a short and full hop:
(for those of you at home, 23.9 x .85 = 20.315 = ~20.3)
But with Peach, as MBorg has noted, things are a little different...
Here's an un-staled Peach back-air from a short hop, full hop and then a float cancel (please forgive my terribad video editing):
Notice how--while the short hop deals only 12.8%--both the full hop and float cancel clock in at the same amount of damage: 15.1%!
This is something I've seen many players in the community clamoring about nerfing. It's a disadvantage everyone has except Peach! While less damage means less knockback (given the way knockback operates) which means potentially more combos, Peach already has some devastating 0-80% combos with her float cancels as they are!
With Balance Patch 3.1.0 dropping any day now, we'll see if this gets touched...
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "41"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fgaming.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f351976%2fdoes-peachs-float-negate-shorthop-knockback-multipliers%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
To clarify, the short hop multiplier does not directly change knockback. Instead, it lowers the damage of short hop aerials by 15% (to 85%). The knockback is only reduced because it's calculated after the damage, and opponents with less damage get knockbacked less. This is only a small reduction in knockback.
Back to your question, yes, Peach's (and Daisy's) float negates this multiplier. This makes Peach's (and Daisy's) aerials relatively more damaging and with greater shieldstun. They can be performed anywhere in the air, including close to the ground as per this demonstrative video. This same video later highlights the potency of these aerials' increased damage and shieldstun through combos that rack up damage quickly and imply strong shield pressure.
add a comment |
To clarify, the short hop multiplier does not directly change knockback. Instead, it lowers the damage of short hop aerials by 15% (to 85%). The knockback is only reduced because it's calculated after the damage, and opponents with less damage get knockbacked less. This is only a small reduction in knockback.
Back to your question, yes, Peach's (and Daisy's) float negates this multiplier. This makes Peach's (and Daisy's) aerials relatively more damaging and with greater shieldstun. They can be performed anywhere in the air, including close to the ground as per this demonstrative video. This same video later highlights the potency of these aerials' increased damage and shieldstun through combos that rack up damage quickly and imply strong shield pressure.
add a comment |
To clarify, the short hop multiplier does not directly change knockback. Instead, it lowers the damage of short hop aerials by 15% (to 85%). The knockback is only reduced because it's calculated after the damage, and opponents with less damage get knockbacked less. This is only a small reduction in knockback.
Back to your question, yes, Peach's (and Daisy's) float negates this multiplier. This makes Peach's (and Daisy's) aerials relatively more damaging and with greater shieldstun. They can be performed anywhere in the air, including close to the ground as per this demonstrative video. This same video later highlights the potency of these aerials' increased damage and shieldstun through combos that rack up damage quickly and imply strong shield pressure.
To clarify, the short hop multiplier does not directly change knockback. Instead, it lowers the damage of short hop aerials by 15% (to 85%). The knockback is only reduced because it's calculated after the damage, and opponents with less damage get knockbacked less. This is only a small reduction in knockback.
Back to your question, yes, Peach's (and Daisy's) float negates this multiplier. This makes Peach's (and Daisy's) aerials relatively more damaging and with greater shieldstun. They can be performed anywhere in the air, including close to the ground as per this demonstrative video. This same video later highlights the potency of these aerials' increased damage and shieldstun through combos that rack up damage quickly and imply strong shield pressure.
answered 4 hours ago
MBorgMBorg
1,509522
1,509522
add a comment |
add a comment |
Yes. If Peach (or Daisy) Float Cancel, they’re not affected by the Short Hop Modifier
@MBorg's answer is right on the money. But I'd like to supplement it with some visuals:
Like they explain, for all characters, any aerial performed out of a shorthop will have a .85x damage modifier attached to it. For example, with an un-staled Ganon down-air performed from both a short and full hop:
(for those of you at home, 23.9 x .85 = 20.315 = ~20.3)
But with Peach, as MBorg has noted, things are a little different...
Here's an un-staled Peach back-air from a short hop, full hop and then a float cancel (please forgive my terribad video editing):
Notice how--while the short hop deals only 12.8%--both the full hop and float cancel clock in at the same amount of damage: 15.1%!
This is something I've seen many players in the community clamoring about nerfing. It's a disadvantage everyone has except Peach! While less damage means less knockback (given the way knockback operates) which means potentially more combos, Peach already has some devastating 0-80% combos with her float cancels as they are!
With Balance Patch 3.1.0 dropping any day now, we'll see if this gets touched...
add a comment |
Yes. If Peach (or Daisy) Float Cancel, they’re not affected by the Short Hop Modifier
@MBorg's answer is right on the money. But I'd like to supplement it with some visuals:
Like they explain, for all characters, any aerial performed out of a shorthop will have a .85x damage modifier attached to it. For example, with an un-staled Ganon down-air performed from both a short and full hop:
(for those of you at home, 23.9 x .85 = 20.315 = ~20.3)
But with Peach, as MBorg has noted, things are a little different...
Here's an un-staled Peach back-air from a short hop, full hop and then a float cancel (please forgive my terribad video editing):
Notice how--while the short hop deals only 12.8%--both the full hop and float cancel clock in at the same amount of damage: 15.1%!
This is something I've seen many players in the community clamoring about nerfing. It's a disadvantage everyone has except Peach! While less damage means less knockback (given the way knockback operates) which means potentially more combos, Peach already has some devastating 0-80% combos with her float cancels as they are!
With Balance Patch 3.1.0 dropping any day now, we'll see if this gets touched...
add a comment |
Yes. If Peach (or Daisy) Float Cancel, they’re not affected by the Short Hop Modifier
@MBorg's answer is right on the money. But I'd like to supplement it with some visuals:
Like they explain, for all characters, any aerial performed out of a shorthop will have a .85x damage modifier attached to it. For example, with an un-staled Ganon down-air performed from both a short and full hop:
(for those of you at home, 23.9 x .85 = 20.315 = ~20.3)
But with Peach, as MBorg has noted, things are a little different...
Here's an un-staled Peach back-air from a short hop, full hop and then a float cancel (please forgive my terribad video editing):
Notice how--while the short hop deals only 12.8%--both the full hop and float cancel clock in at the same amount of damage: 15.1%!
This is something I've seen many players in the community clamoring about nerfing. It's a disadvantage everyone has except Peach! While less damage means less knockback (given the way knockback operates) which means potentially more combos, Peach already has some devastating 0-80% combos with her float cancels as they are!
With Balance Patch 3.1.0 dropping any day now, we'll see if this gets touched...
Yes. If Peach (or Daisy) Float Cancel, they’re not affected by the Short Hop Modifier
@MBorg's answer is right on the money. But I'd like to supplement it with some visuals:
Like they explain, for all characters, any aerial performed out of a shorthop will have a .85x damage modifier attached to it. For example, with an un-staled Ganon down-air performed from both a short and full hop:
(for those of you at home, 23.9 x .85 = 20.315 = ~20.3)
But with Peach, as MBorg has noted, things are a little different...
Here's an un-staled Peach back-air from a short hop, full hop and then a float cancel (please forgive my terribad video editing):
Notice how--while the short hop deals only 12.8%--both the full hop and float cancel clock in at the same amount of damage: 15.1%!
This is something I've seen many players in the community clamoring about nerfing. It's a disadvantage everyone has except Peach! While less damage means less knockback (given the way knockback operates) which means potentially more combos, Peach already has some devastating 0-80% combos with her float cancels as they are!
With Balance Patch 3.1.0 dropping any day now, we'll see if this gets touched...
edited 51 mins ago
answered 1 hour ago
scohe001scohe001
4,30121543
4,30121543
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Arqade!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fgaming.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f351976%2fdoes-peachs-float-negate-shorthop-knockback-multipliers%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
If the down-voter wouldn't mind explaining the downvote, I wouldn't mind improving the question.
– Brandon_J
9 hours ago
1
Not the downvoter, but the latter half where it's asking "why does the game not consider..." is towards game dev and design. That is off-topic here
– Wondercricket
9 hours ago
@Wondercricket thanks
– Brandon_J
9 hours ago