For people who believe in Jesus and not the devil, what happend in the desert?What does it mean to test...
Could Sauron have read Tom Bombadil's mind if Tom had held the Palantir?
Do I have to roll to maintain concentration if a target other than me who is affected by my concentration spell takes damage?
“Faire” being used to mean “avoir l’air”?
Math PhD in US vs Master + PhD in Europe
Symbol for "not absolutely continuous" in Latex
Cross over of arrows in a complex diagram
Is there any set of 2-6 notes that doesn't have a chord name?
Why Is Abelian Gauge Theory So Special?
What are good ways to spray paint a QR code on a footpath?
In native German words, is Q always followed by U, as in English?
Is there a short way to check uniqueness of values without using 'if' and multiple 'and's?
Polish letters in ASME English template
Why is a blank required between "[[" and "-e xxx" in ksh?
Transitive action of a discrete group on a compact space
How do I find and plot the intersection of these three surfaces?
When is it ok to add filler to a story?
Set vertical spacing between two particular items
“Transitive verb” + interrupter+ “object”?
For people who believe in Jesus and not the devil, what happend in the desert?
Was touching your nose a greeting in second millenium Mesopotamia?
Why do I have to press the shutter button twice on my Canon 6d Mark II?
Why is the divergence of this series apparently not predicted by the Monotonic Sequence Theorem?
Should I hide continue button until tasks are completed?
How exactly is a normal force exerted, at the molecular level?
For people who believe in Jesus and not the devil, what happend in the desert?
What does it mean to test God?What if we were not tempted by the devil but rather, we failed God's test?Do God and Satan Celebrate Earthly Triumphs?Why did Satan tempt Jesus in the desert?What is the basis for the argument that Jesus DID NOT have the ability to sin or give in to temptation?Are there Christians who believe Jesus was an ideology and not a person?What is the Catholic explanation for temptation?How do Roman Catholics interpret Luke 4:13, regarding the devil leaving Jesus “until an opportune time”?Can the devil be considered guilty?According to Catholicism, did the Temptation(s) of Jesus take place on the same day?
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}
Some Christians believe in God and Jesus, but not the devil.
If so, what is their explanation of the temptation of Christ in the desert?
life-of-jesus satan gospels temptation
New contributor
add a comment |
Some Christians believe in God and Jesus, but not the devil.
If so, what is their explanation of the temptation of Christ in the desert?
life-of-jesus satan gospels temptation
New contributor
Name the denomination that doesn’t believe in the devil
– Kris
8 hours ago
@Kris I meant individual Christians who don't believe in the devil. I don't think the Church of England is totally committed to the idea either. I mean the ToE isn't totally committed to the idea of God either.
– zooby
8 hours ago
This question may not work well here because this site is supposed to focus on denominationally specific questions and answers. The individual Christians who believe that Satan is just a symbol of evil are apparently quite numerous and would most likely say the references to his prescience in garden and in the desert are allegorical.
– Kris
7 hours ago
I expect that there would be denominations which don't believe in a personal devil, but I'm not actually sure of any. If you can find even just one that would help. But the third and fourth paragraphs should be asked separately.
– curiousdannii
6 hours ago
2
The Chrstadelphians do not believe in a personal devil. The same is true of The Church of the Blessed Hope. Some early Unitarians did not believe in a personal devil.
– Mac's Musings
6 hours ago
add a comment |
Some Christians believe in God and Jesus, but not the devil.
If so, what is their explanation of the temptation of Christ in the desert?
life-of-jesus satan gospels temptation
New contributor
Some Christians believe in God and Jesus, but not the devil.
If so, what is their explanation of the temptation of Christ in the desert?
life-of-jesus satan gospels temptation
life-of-jesus satan gospels temptation
New contributor
New contributor
edited 6 hours ago
curiousdannii
10.5k7 gold badges35 silver badges80 bronze badges
10.5k7 gold badges35 silver badges80 bronze badges
New contributor
asked 8 hours ago
zoobyzooby
1092 bronze badges
1092 bronze badges
New contributor
New contributor
Name the denomination that doesn’t believe in the devil
– Kris
8 hours ago
@Kris I meant individual Christians who don't believe in the devil. I don't think the Church of England is totally committed to the idea either. I mean the ToE isn't totally committed to the idea of God either.
– zooby
8 hours ago
This question may not work well here because this site is supposed to focus on denominationally specific questions and answers. The individual Christians who believe that Satan is just a symbol of evil are apparently quite numerous and would most likely say the references to his prescience in garden and in the desert are allegorical.
– Kris
7 hours ago
I expect that there would be denominations which don't believe in a personal devil, but I'm not actually sure of any. If you can find even just one that would help. But the third and fourth paragraphs should be asked separately.
– curiousdannii
6 hours ago
2
The Chrstadelphians do not believe in a personal devil. The same is true of The Church of the Blessed Hope. Some early Unitarians did not believe in a personal devil.
– Mac's Musings
6 hours ago
add a comment |
Name the denomination that doesn’t believe in the devil
– Kris
8 hours ago
@Kris I meant individual Christians who don't believe in the devil. I don't think the Church of England is totally committed to the idea either. I mean the ToE isn't totally committed to the idea of God either.
– zooby
8 hours ago
This question may not work well here because this site is supposed to focus on denominationally specific questions and answers. The individual Christians who believe that Satan is just a symbol of evil are apparently quite numerous and would most likely say the references to his prescience in garden and in the desert are allegorical.
– Kris
7 hours ago
I expect that there would be denominations which don't believe in a personal devil, but I'm not actually sure of any. If you can find even just one that would help. But the third and fourth paragraphs should be asked separately.
– curiousdannii
6 hours ago
2
The Chrstadelphians do not believe in a personal devil. The same is true of The Church of the Blessed Hope. Some early Unitarians did not believe in a personal devil.
– Mac's Musings
6 hours ago
Name the denomination that doesn’t believe in the devil
– Kris
8 hours ago
Name the denomination that doesn’t believe in the devil
– Kris
8 hours ago
@Kris I meant individual Christians who don't believe in the devil. I don't think the Church of England is totally committed to the idea either. I mean the ToE isn't totally committed to the idea of God either.
– zooby
8 hours ago
@Kris I meant individual Christians who don't believe in the devil. I don't think the Church of England is totally committed to the idea either. I mean the ToE isn't totally committed to the idea of God either.
– zooby
8 hours ago
This question may not work well here because this site is supposed to focus on denominationally specific questions and answers. The individual Christians who believe that Satan is just a symbol of evil are apparently quite numerous and would most likely say the references to his prescience in garden and in the desert are allegorical.
– Kris
7 hours ago
This question may not work well here because this site is supposed to focus on denominationally specific questions and answers. The individual Christians who believe that Satan is just a symbol of evil are apparently quite numerous and would most likely say the references to his prescience in garden and in the desert are allegorical.
– Kris
7 hours ago
I expect that there would be denominations which don't believe in a personal devil, but I'm not actually sure of any. If you can find even just one that would help. But the third and fourth paragraphs should be asked separately.
– curiousdannii
6 hours ago
I expect that there would be denominations which don't believe in a personal devil, but I'm not actually sure of any. If you can find even just one that would help. But the third and fourth paragraphs should be asked separately.
– curiousdannii
6 hours ago
2
2
The Chrstadelphians do not believe in a personal devil. The same is true of The Church of the Blessed Hope. Some early Unitarians did not believe in a personal devil.
– Mac's Musings
6 hours ago
The Chrstadelphians do not believe in a personal devil. The same is true of The Church of the Blessed Hope. Some early Unitarians did not believe in a personal devil.
– Mac's Musings
6 hours ago
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
For people who believe in Jesus and not the devil, what happend in the desert?
There are Christians who believe in Jesus, but not in a personal Devil. For example: the Christadelphians.
Devil
Christadelphians believe that the Satan or Devil is not an independent spiritual being or fallen angel. Devil is viewed as the general principle of evil and inclination to sin which resides in humankind. They are convinced that, dependent on the context, the term Satan in Hebrew merely means "opponent" or "adversary" and is frequently applied to human beings. Accordingly, they do not define Hell as a place of eternal torment for sinners, but as a State of Eternal Death respectively non-existence due to annihilation of body and mind. - Christadelphian (Wikipedia)
They tend not to take the Scriptures “literally”. This includes the temptations of Christ in the desert.
The temptations evidently cannot be taken literally:
Matthew 4:8 implies that Jesus was led up into a high mountain to see all the kingdoms of the world in their future glory "in a moment of time" (Mk.4:5). There is no mountain high enough to see all the world. And why would the height of the mountain enable Jesus to see what the world would be like in the future? The earth being a sphere, there is no point on its surface from which one can see all the parts of the world at any one time.
A comparison of Matt. 4 and Luke 4 shows that the temptations are described in a different order. Mark 1:13 says that Jesus was "in the wilderness forty days, tempted of Satan", whilst Matt. 4:2-3 says that "when he had fasted forty days...the tempter (Satan) came to Him...". Because Scripture cannot contradict itself, we can conclude that these same temptations kept repeating themselves. The temptation to turn stones into bread is an obvious example. This would fit nicely if these temptations occurred within the mind of Jesus. Being of our nature, the lack of food would have affected him mentally as well as physically, and thus his mind would have easily begun to imagine things. Just going a few days without food can lead to delirium for some (cp. 1 Sam.30:12). The similarity between rolls of bread and stones is mentioned by Jesus in Mt.7:9, and doubtless those images often merged in his tortured mind - although always to be brought under swift control by his recollection of the Word.
Jesus probably told the Gospel writers the record of his temptations, and to bring home in words the intensity of what he underwent, he could have used the figurative approach seen in Matt. 4 and Luke 4.
It seems unlikely that the devil led Jesus through the wilderness and streets of Jerusalem and then they scaled a pinnacle of the temple together, all in view of the inquisitive Jews. Josephus makes no record of anything like this happening - presumably it would have caused a major stir. Similarly, if these temptations occurred several times within the forty days as well as at the end of that period (which they did at least twice, seeing that Matthew and Luke have them in different order), how would Jesus have had time to walk (n.b. the devil "led" Jesus there) to the nearest high mountain (which would have been Hermon in the far north of Israel), climb to the top and back down again, return to the wilderness and then repeat the exercise? His temptations all occurred in the wilderness - he was there for forty days, tempted all the time by the devil (who only departed at the end - Matt. 4:11). If Jesus was tempted by the devil each day, and the temptations occurred only in the wilderness, then it follows that Jesus could not have left the wilderness to go to Jerusalem or travel to a high mountain. These things therefore could not have happened literally.
If the devil is a physical person who has no respect for God's Word and is interested in making people sin, then why would Jesus quote Scripture to him to overcome him? According to the popular view, this would not send the devil away. Notice that Jesus quoted a Bible passage each time. If the devil was the evil desires within Jesus' heart, then it is understandable that by his having the Word in his heart and reminding himself of it, he could overcome those bad desires. Psalm 119:11 is so relevant that perhaps it is specifically prophesying Christ's experiences in the wilderness: "Thy word have I hid in mine heart, that I might not sin against Thee".
Matt. 4:1 says that Jesus was "led up of the spirit into the wilderness to be tempted of the devil." This was the Spirit of God which had just been bestowed upon him (ch. 3:16). It would be an extraordinary thing for the Spirit of God to lead Jesus into the wilderness so that he cftould be tempted by a superhuman being existing in opposition to God. - Digression 20: The Temptations Of Jesus
Many Christians who deny the Devil will follow similar lines: Scriptures are not to be always taken literally.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "304"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
zooby is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fchristianity.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f71502%2ffor-people-who-believe-in-jesus-and-not-the-devil-what-happend-in-the-desert%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
For people who believe in Jesus and not the devil, what happend in the desert?
There are Christians who believe in Jesus, but not in a personal Devil. For example: the Christadelphians.
Devil
Christadelphians believe that the Satan or Devil is not an independent spiritual being or fallen angel. Devil is viewed as the general principle of evil and inclination to sin which resides in humankind. They are convinced that, dependent on the context, the term Satan in Hebrew merely means "opponent" or "adversary" and is frequently applied to human beings. Accordingly, they do not define Hell as a place of eternal torment for sinners, but as a State of Eternal Death respectively non-existence due to annihilation of body and mind. - Christadelphian (Wikipedia)
They tend not to take the Scriptures “literally”. This includes the temptations of Christ in the desert.
The temptations evidently cannot be taken literally:
Matthew 4:8 implies that Jesus was led up into a high mountain to see all the kingdoms of the world in their future glory "in a moment of time" (Mk.4:5). There is no mountain high enough to see all the world. And why would the height of the mountain enable Jesus to see what the world would be like in the future? The earth being a sphere, there is no point on its surface from which one can see all the parts of the world at any one time.
A comparison of Matt. 4 and Luke 4 shows that the temptations are described in a different order. Mark 1:13 says that Jesus was "in the wilderness forty days, tempted of Satan", whilst Matt. 4:2-3 says that "when he had fasted forty days...the tempter (Satan) came to Him...". Because Scripture cannot contradict itself, we can conclude that these same temptations kept repeating themselves. The temptation to turn stones into bread is an obvious example. This would fit nicely if these temptations occurred within the mind of Jesus. Being of our nature, the lack of food would have affected him mentally as well as physically, and thus his mind would have easily begun to imagine things. Just going a few days without food can lead to delirium for some (cp. 1 Sam.30:12). The similarity between rolls of bread and stones is mentioned by Jesus in Mt.7:9, and doubtless those images often merged in his tortured mind - although always to be brought under swift control by his recollection of the Word.
Jesus probably told the Gospel writers the record of his temptations, and to bring home in words the intensity of what he underwent, he could have used the figurative approach seen in Matt. 4 and Luke 4.
It seems unlikely that the devil led Jesus through the wilderness and streets of Jerusalem and then they scaled a pinnacle of the temple together, all in view of the inquisitive Jews. Josephus makes no record of anything like this happening - presumably it would have caused a major stir. Similarly, if these temptations occurred several times within the forty days as well as at the end of that period (which they did at least twice, seeing that Matthew and Luke have them in different order), how would Jesus have had time to walk (n.b. the devil "led" Jesus there) to the nearest high mountain (which would have been Hermon in the far north of Israel), climb to the top and back down again, return to the wilderness and then repeat the exercise? His temptations all occurred in the wilderness - he was there for forty days, tempted all the time by the devil (who only departed at the end - Matt. 4:11). If Jesus was tempted by the devil each day, and the temptations occurred only in the wilderness, then it follows that Jesus could not have left the wilderness to go to Jerusalem or travel to a high mountain. These things therefore could not have happened literally.
If the devil is a physical person who has no respect for God's Word and is interested in making people sin, then why would Jesus quote Scripture to him to overcome him? According to the popular view, this would not send the devil away. Notice that Jesus quoted a Bible passage each time. If the devil was the evil desires within Jesus' heart, then it is understandable that by his having the Word in his heart and reminding himself of it, he could overcome those bad desires. Psalm 119:11 is so relevant that perhaps it is specifically prophesying Christ's experiences in the wilderness: "Thy word have I hid in mine heart, that I might not sin against Thee".
Matt. 4:1 says that Jesus was "led up of the spirit into the wilderness to be tempted of the devil." This was the Spirit of God which had just been bestowed upon him (ch. 3:16). It would be an extraordinary thing for the Spirit of God to lead Jesus into the wilderness so that he cftould be tempted by a superhuman being existing in opposition to God. - Digression 20: The Temptations Of Jesus
Many Christians who deny the Devil will follow similar lines: Scriptures are not to be always taken literally.
add a comment |
For people who believe in Jesus and not the devil, what happend in the desert?
There are Christians who believe in Jesus, but not in a personal Devil. For example: the Christadelphians.
Devil
Christadelphians believe that the Satan or Devil is not an independent spiritual being or fallen angel. Devil is viewed as the general principle of evil and inclination to sin which resides in humankind. They are convinced that, dependent on the context, the term Satan in Hebrew merely means "opponent" or "adversary" and is frequently applied to human beings. Accordingly, they do not define Hell as a place of eternal torment for sinners, but as a State of Eternal Death respectively non-existence due to annihilation of body and mind. - Christadelphian (Wikipedia)
They tend not to take the Scriptures “literally”. This includes the temptations of Christ in the desert.
The temptations evidently cannot be taken literally:
Matthew 4:8 implies that Jesus was led up into a high mountain to see all the kingdoms of the world in their future glory "in a moment of time" (Mk.4:5). There is no mountain high enough to see all the world. And why would the height of the mountain enable Jesus to see what the world would be like in the future? The earth being a sphere, there is no point on its surface from which one can see all the parts of the world at any one time.
A comparison of Matt. 4 and Luke 4 shows that the temptations are described in a different order. Mark 1:13 says that Jesus was "in the wilderness forty days, tempted of Satan", whilst Matt. 4:2-3 says that "when he had fasted forty days...the tempter (Satan) came to Him...". Because Scripture cannot contradict itself, we can conclude that these same temptations kept repeating themselves. The temptation to turn stones into bread is an obvious example. This would fit nicely if these temptations occurred within the mind of Jesus. Being of our nature, the lack of food would have affected him mentally as well as physically, and thus his mind would have easily begun to imagine things. Just going a few days without food can lead to delirium for some (cp. 1 Sam.30:12). The similarity between rolls of bread and stones is mentioned by Jesus in Mt.7:9, and doubtless those images often merged in his tortured mind - although always to be brought under swift control by his recollection of the Word.
Jesus probably told the Gospel writers the record of his temptations, and to bring home in words the intensity of what he underwent, he could have used the figurative approach seen in Matt. 4 and Luke 4.
It seems unlikely that the devil led Jesus through the wilderness and streets of Jerusalem and then they scaled a pinnacle of the temple together, all in view of the inquisitive Jews. Josephus makes no record of anything like this happening - presumably it would have caused a major stir. Similarly, if these temptations occurred several times within the forty days as well as at the end of that period (which they did at least twice, seeing that Matthew and Luke have them in different order), how would Jesus have had time to walk (n.b. the devil "led" Jesus there) to the nearest high mountain (which would have been Hermon in the far north of Israel), climb to the top and back down again, return to the wilderness and then repeat the exercise? His temptations all occurred in the wilderness - he was there for forty days, tempted all the time by the devil (who only departed at the end - Matt. 4:11). If Jesus was tempted by the devil each day, and the temptations occurred only in the wilderness, then it follows that Jesus could not have left the wilderness to go to Jerusalem or travel to a high mountain. These things therefore could not have happened literally.
If the devil is a physical person who has no respect for God's Word and is interested in making people sin, then why would Jesus quote Scripture to him to overcome him? According to the popular view, this would not send the devil away. Notice that Jesus quoted a Bible passage each time. If the devil was the evil desires within Jesus' heart, then it is understandable that by his having the Word in his heart and reminding himself of it, he could overcome those bad desires. Psalm 119:11 is so relevant that perhaps it is specifically prophesying Christ's experiences in the wilderness: "Thy word have I hid in mine heart, that I might not sin against Thee".
Matt. 4:1 says that Jesus was "led up of the spirit into the wilderness to be tempted of the devil." This was the Spirit of God which had just been bestowed upon him (ch. 3:16). It would be an extraordinary thing for the Spirit of God to lead Jesus into the wilderness so that he cftould be tempted by a superhuman being existing in opposition to God. - Digression 20: The Temptations Of Jesus
Many Christians who deny the Devil will follow similar lines: Scriptures are not to be always taken literally.
add a comment |
For people who believe in Jesus and not the devil, what happend in the desert?
There are Christians who believe in Jesus, but not in a personal Devil. For example: the Christadelphians.
Devil
Christadelphians believe that the Satan or Devil is not an independent spiritual being or fallen angel. Devil is viewed as the general principle of evil and inclination to sin which resides in humankind. They are convinced that, dependent on the context, the term Satan in Hebrew merely means "opponent" or "adversary" and is frequently applied to human beings. Accordingly, they do not define Hell as a place of eternal torment for sinners, but as a State of Eternal Death respectively non-existence due to annihilation of body and mind. - Christadelphian (Wikipedia)
They tend not to take the Scriptures “literally”. This includes the temptations of Christ in the desert.
The temptations evidently cannot be taken literally:
Matthew 4:8 implies that Jesus was led up into a high mountain to see all the kingdoms of the world in their future glory "in a moment of time" (Mk.4:5). There is no mountain high enough to see all the world. And why would the height of the mountain enable Jesus to see what the world would be like in the future? The earth being a sphere, there is no point on its surface from which one can see all the parts of the world at any one time.
A comparison of Matt. 4 and Luke 4 shows that the temptations are described in a different order. Mark 1:13 says that Jesus was "in the wilderness forty days, tempted of Satan", whilst Matt. 4:2-3 says that "when he had fasted forty days...the tempter (Satan) came to Him...". Because Scripture cannot contradict itself, we can conclude that these same temptations kept repeating themselves. The temptation to turn stones into bread is an obvious example. This would fit nicely if these temptations occurred within the mind of Jesus. Being of our nature, the lack of food would have affected him mentally as well as physically, and thus his mind would have easily begun to imagine things. Just going a few days without food can lead to delirium for some (cp. 1 Sam.30:12). The similarity between rolls of bread and stones is mentioned by Jesus in Mt.7:9, and doubtless those images often merged in his tortured mind - although always to be brought under swift control by his recollection of the Word.
Jesus probably told the Gospel writers the record of his temptations, and to bring home in words the intensity of what he underwent, he could have used the figurative approach seen in Matt. 4 and Luke 4.
It seems unlikely that the devil led Jesus through the wilderness and streets of Jerusalem and then they scaled a pinnacle of the temple together, all in view of the inquisitive Jews. Josephus makes no record of anything like this happening - presumably it would have caused a major stir. Similarly, if these temptations occurred several times within the forty days as well as at the end of that period (which they did at least twice, seeing that Matthew and Luke have them in different order), how would Jesus have had time to walk (n.b. the devil "led" Jesus there) to the nearest high mountain (which would have been Hermon in the far north of Israel), climb to the top and back down again, return to the wilderness and then repeat the exercise? His temptations all occurred in the wilderness - he was there for forty days, tempted all the time by the devil (who only departed at the end - Matt. 4:11). If Jesus was tempted by the devil each day, and the temptations occurred only in the wilderness, then it follows that Jesus could not have left the wilderness to go to Jerusalem or travel to a high mountain. These things therefore could not have happened literally.
If the devil is a physical person who has no respect for God's Word and is interested in making people sin, then why would Jesus quote Scripture to him to overcome him? According to the popular view, this would not send the devil away. Notice that Jesus quoted a Bible passage each time. If the devil was the evil desires within Jesus' heart, then it is understandable that by his having the Word in his heart and reminding himself of it, he could overcome those bad desires. Psalm 119:11 is so relevant that perhaps it is specifically prophesying Christ's experiences in the wilderness: "Thy word have I hid in mine heart, that I might not sin against Thee".
Matt. 4:1 says that Jesus was "led up of the spirit into the wilderness to be tempted of the devil." This was the Spirit of God which had just been bestowed upon him (ch. 3:16). It would be an extraordinary thing for the Spirit of God to lead Jesus into the wilderness so that he cftould be tempted by a superhuman being existing in opposition to God. - Digression 20: The Temptations Of Jesus
Many Christians who deny the Devil will follow similar lines: Scriptures are not to be always taken literally.
For people who believe in Jesus and not the devil, what happend in the desert?
There are Christians who believe in Jesus, but not in a personal Devil. For example: the Christadelphians.
Devil
Christadelphians believe that the Satan or Devil is not an independent spiritual being or fallen angel. Devil is viewed as the general principle of evil and inclination to sin which resides in humankind. They are convinced that, dependent on the context, the term Satan in Hebrew merely means "opponent" or "adversary" and is frequently applied to human beings. Accordingly, they do not define Hell as a place of eternal torment for sinners, but as a State of Eternal Death respectively non-existence due to annihilation of body and mind. - Christadelphian (Wikipedia)
They tend not to take the Scriptures “literally”. This includes the temptations of Christ in the desert.
The temptations evidently cannot be taken literally:
Matthew 4:8 implies that Jesus was led up into a high mountain to see all the kingdoms of the world in their future glory "in a moment of time" (Mk.4:5). There is no mountain high enough to see all the world. And why would the height of the mountain enable Jesus to see what the world would be like in the future? The earth being a sphere, there is no point on its surface from which one can see all the parts of the world at any one time.
A comparison of Matt. 4 and Luke 4 shows that the temptations are described in a different order. Mark 1:13 says that Jesus was "in the wilderness forty days, tempted of Satan", whilst Matt. 4:2-3 says that "when he had fasted forty days...the tempter (Satan) came to Him...". Because Scripture cannot contradict itself, we can conclude that these same temptations kept repeating themselves. The temptation to turn stones into bread is an obvious example. This would fit nicely if these temptations occurred within the mind of Jesus. Being of our nature, the lack of food would have affected him mentally as well as physically, and thus his mind would have easily begun to imagine things. Just going a few days without food can lead to delirium for some (cp. 1 Sam.30:12). The similarity between rolls of bread and stones is mentioned by Jesus in Mt.7:9, and doubtless those images often merged in his tortured mind - although always to be brought under swift control by his recollection of the Word.
Jesus probably told the Gospel writers the record of his temptations, and to bring home in words the intensity of what he underwent, he could have used the figurative approach seen in Matt. 4 and Luke 4.
It seems unlikely that the devil led Jesus through the wilderness and streets of Jerusalem and then they scaled a pinnacle of the temple together, all in view of the inquisitive Jews. Josephus makes no record of anything like this happening - presumably it would have caused a major stir. Similarly, if these temptations occurred several times within the forty days as well as at the end of that period (which they did at least twice, seeing that Matthew and Luke have them in different order), how would Jesus have had time to walk (n.b. the devil "led" Jesus there) to the nearest high mountain (which would have been Hermon in the far north of Israel), climb to the top and back down again, return to the wilderness and then repeat the exercise? His temptations all occurred in the wilderness - he was there for forty days, tempted all the time by the devil (who only departed at the end - Matt. 4:11). If Jesus was tempted by the devil each day, and the temptations occurred only in the wilderness, then it follows that Jesus could not have left the wilderness to go to Jerusalem or travel to a high mountain. These things therefore could not have happened literally.
If the devil is a physical person who has no respect for God's Word and is interested in making people sin, then why would Jesus quote Scripture to him to overcome him? According to the popular view, this would not send the devil away. Notice that Jesus quoted a Bible passage each time. If the devil was the evil desires within Jesus' heart, then it is understandable that by his having the Word in his heart and reminding himself of it, he could overcome those bad desires. Psalm 119:11 is so relevant that perhaps it is specifically prophesying Christ's experiences in the wilderness: "Thy word have I hid in mine heart, that I might not sin against Thee".
Matt. 4:1 says that Jesus was "led up of the spirit into the wilderness to be tempted of the devil." This was the Spirit of God which had just been bestowed upon him (ch. 3:16). It would be an extraordinary thing for the Spirit of God to lead Jesus into the wilderness so that he cftould be tempted by a superhuman being existing in opposition to God. - Digression 20: The Temptations Of Jesus
Many Christians who deny the Devil will follow similar lines: Scriptures are not to be always taken literally.
edited 3 hours ago
answered 4 hours ago
Ken GrahamKen Graham
17.9k3 gold badges23 silver badges66 bronze badges
17.9k3 gold badges23 silver badges66 bronze badges
add a comment |
add a comment |
zooby is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
zooby is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
zooby is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
zooby is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Christianity Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fchristianity.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f71502%2ffor-people-who-believe-in-jesus-and-not-the-devil-what-happend-in-the-desert%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Name the denomination that doesn’t believe in the devil
– Kris
8 hours ago
@Kris I meant individual Christians who don't believe in the devil. I don't think the Church of England is totally committed to the idea either. I mean the ToE isn't totally committed to the idea of God either.
– zooby
8 hours ago
This question may not work well here because this site is supposed to focus on denominationally specific questions and answers. The individual Christians who believe that Satan is just a symbol of evil are apparently quite numerous and would most likely say the references to his prescience in garden and in the desert are allegorical.
– Kris
7 hours ago
I expect that there would be denominations which don't believe in a personal devil, but I'm not actually sure of any. If you can find even just one that would help. But the third and fourth paragraphs should be asked separately.
– curiousdannii
6 hours ago
2
The Chrstadelphians do not believe in a personal devil. The same is true of The Church of the Blessed Hope. Some early Unitarians did not believe in a personal devil.
– Mac's Musings
6 hours ago