How do accents of a whole town drift?Accents resources?Fastest way to learn accents for English nativeIs...

How can I check type T is among parameter pack Ts... in C++?

Did Chinese school textbook maps (c. 1951) "depict China as stretching even into the central Asian republics"?

Is it bad to describe a character long after their introduction?

Why is a blank required between "[[" and "-e xxx" in ksh?

How fast can a ship with rotating habitats be accelerated?

Was touching your nose a greeting in second millenium Mesopotamia?

Which centaur is more 'official'?

How hard is it to sell a home which is currently mortgaged?

Why is the Turkish president's surname spelt in Russian as Эрдоган, with г?

Do 3D printers really reach 50 micron (0.050mm) accuracy?

Why isn’t the tax system continuous rather than bracketed?

MH370 blackbox - is it still possible to retrieve data from it?

Bash echo $-1 prints hb1. Why?

How would a order of Monks that renounce their names communicate effectively?

Golf the smallest circle!

When to apply Lorentz transformations and laws of time dilations and length contractions: explanations

How to convert object fill in to fine lines?

How can I convince my reader that I will not use a certain trope?

Why won't the ground take my seed?

Should I tell my insurance company I have an unsecured loan for my new car?

Should I hide continue button until tasks are completed?

Can you sign using a digital signature itself?

Quacks of Quedlingburg Crow Skull Set 2 Keep Drawing

What does 2>&1 | tee mean?



How do accents of a whole town drift?


Accents resources?Fastest way to learn accents for English nativeIs Anglo-English more diverse in terms of accents than, say, French (in France)?We have constructed languages, but are there constructed accents?What gives rise to racial accents? (timbre)Accents and dialectsHow fast do people lose their accents and regain them?Corpus for Asian American Accents?Do sign languages have “accents” like verbal languages?Are there common traits of foreign accents across languages?






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}







1















I've heard it said that accents of towns drift over time. I find this hard to comprehend as how could an accent of a whole town change?



I think it is established that we mainly pick up our accent from our peers at school. But this is also odd, since if we are separated by age, peers in an age group should not really interact that much from other age groups, so where do their accents come from in the first place? Perhaps, maybe this is the answer, that because in schools we are separated from older children to a large degree, the accent can drift as it has no correction from older children.



But this still seems unlikely to me as universal schooling is a quite recent thing, and before then we had mainly apprenticeships which children would learn from adults and presumably pick up their accents.



Another (to me) unlikely idea is that a town's accent (e.g. Liverpudlian) has changed due to people talking over machinery in factories or mills so it gets higher pitched. Can an accent of a town really change that quickly?



But what I do see is that immigration affects accents a lot, for example the Jamaican accent changing the London cockney accent. Or the Geordie accent with lots of Scandinavian words also from immigration.



So in essence, is accent drift a real thing (has it been observed) and what is the main cause?










share|improve this question































    1















    I've heard it said that accents of towns drift over time. I find this hard to comprehend as how could an accent of a whole town change?



    I think it is established that we mainly pick up our accent from our peers at school. But this is also odd, since if we are separated by age, peers in an age group should not really interact that much from other age groups, so where do their accents come from in the first place? Perhaps, maybe this is the answer, that because in schools we are separated from older children to a large degree, the accent can drift as it has no correction from older children.



    But this still seems unlikely to me as universal schooling is a quite recent thing, and before then we had mainly apprenticeships which children would learn from adults and presumably pick up their accents.



    Another (to me) unlikely idea is that a town's accent (e.g. Liverpudlian) has changed due to people talking over machinery in factories or mills so it gets higher pitched. Can an accent of a town really change that quickly?



    But what I do see is that immigration affects accents a lot, for example the Jamaican accent changing the London cockney accent. Or the Geordie accent with lots of Scandinavian words also from immigration.



    So in essence, is accent drift a real thing (has it been observed) and what is the main cause?










    share|improve this question



























      1












      1








      1


      1






      I've heard it said that accents of towns drift over time. I find this hard to comprehend as how could an accent of a whole town change?



      I think it is established that we mainly pick up our accent from our peers at school. But this is also odd, since if we are separated by age, peers in an age group should not really interact that much from other age groups, so where do their accents come from in the first place? Perhaps, maybe this is the answer, that because in schools we are separated from older children to a large degree, the accent can drift as it has no correction from older children.



      But this still seems unlikely to me as universal schooling is a quite recent thing, and before then we had mainly apprenticeships which children would learn from adults and presumably pick up their accents.



      Another (to me) unlikely idea is that a town's accent (e.g. Liverpudlian) has changed due to people talking over machinery in factories or mills so it gets higher pitched. Can an accent of a town really change that quickly?



      But what I do see is that immigration affects accents a lot, for example the Jamaican accent changing the London cockney accent. Or the Geordie accent with lots of Scandinavian words also from immigration.



      So in essence, is accent drift a real thing (has it been observed) and what is the main cause?










      share|improve this question
















      I've heard it said that accents of towns drift over time. I find this hard to comprehend as how could an accent of a whole town change?



      I think it is established that we mainly pick up our accent from our peers at school. But this is also odd, since if we are separated by age, peers in an age group should not really interact that much from other age groups, so where do their accents come from in the first place? Perhaps, maybe this is the answer, that because in schools we are separated from older children to a large degree, the accent can drift as it has no correction from older children.



      But this still seems unlikely to me as universal schooling is a quite recent thing, and before then we had mainly apprenticeships which children would learn from adults and presumably pick up their accents.



      Another (to me) unlikely idea is that a town's accent (e.g. Liverpudlian) has changed due to people talking over machinery in factories or mills so it gets higher pitched. Can an accent of a town really change that quickly?



      But what I do see is that immigration affects accents a lot, for example the Jamaican accent changing the London cockney accent. Or the Geordie accent with lots of Scandinavian words also from immigration.



      So in essence, is accent drift a real thing (has it been observed) and what is the main cause?







      language-change sound-change accent






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited 7 hours ago









      curiousdannii

      2,9983 gold badges15 silver badges32 bronze badges




      2,9983 gold badges15 silver badges32 bronze badges










      asked 8 hours ago









      zoobyzooby

      1283 bronze badges




      1283 bronze badges






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          2














          This does indeed happen! It tends to follow the same processes that make whole languages change over time. Just on a smaller scale: smaller area, smaller changes, smaller timespans. (Intuitive example: surely the first American colonists spoke "British English", since what would be the alternative? And look at what that's led to now.)



          One way to think of it is, language is a tool for communication, and if it's not serving its purpose, it'll evolve with ruthless efficiency until it is. For a dramatic example, look at how quickly people stopped using capital letters in text messages: they were getting in the way of fast and efficient communication, so they were pruned away. Then, within five years, they were brought back, with a new purpose: SHOUTING, Distinctly Emphatic Tone, SaRcAsTiC MoCkErY, and so on. This helped communication, so it's stuck.



          It might start with a "random mutation", just by chance. One man in the town pronounces his /a/ a little more like [æ]. He teaches this pronunciation to his children, who might influence their peers, until everyone pronounces that vowel slightly more to the front. This starts crowding /æ/, so over time that starts to shift upward in order to remain distinct. And so on, and so on…a small initial shift like that can lead to a complete restructuring of the vowel system, given enough time.






          share|improve this answer
























          • Hmm, but if this was just random, this sounds like it would take an awful long time for things to spread. On the other hand, if it was by people of influence, or importance, I can see that people would tend to mimic those people they admire. Just as people mimic the royal family's clothes, and even Christmas. But then again slang terms originate by 1 or 2 people and they can spread quite fast. So maybe vowel sounds can too. But this seems like a more conscious effor to sound cool than purely randomness. (Like when Londoners started mimicking the accent of the Beatles or Oasis.)

            – zooby
            5 hours ago













          • @zooby Depends! Children are extremely impressionable, linguistically, and it's very easy for them to pick up little quirks. But high-status people like the Royal Family do indeed tend to create their own standards: see "Received Pronunciation" or "the Queen's English".

            – Draconis
            4 hours ago











          • British English has changed too. Many features of American English are conservative.

            – Adam Bittlingmayer
            3 hours ago














          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "312"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2flinguistics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f31798%2fhow-do-accents-of-a-whole-town-drift%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          2














          This does indeed happen! It tends to follow the same processes that make whole languages change over time. Just on a smaller scale: smaller area, smaller changes, smaller timespans. (Intuitive example: surely the first American colonists spoke "British English", since what would be the alternative? And look at what that's led to now.)



          One way to think of it is, language is a tool for communication, and if it's not serving its purpose, it'll evolve with ruthless efficiency until it is. For a dramatic example, look at how quickly people stopped using capital letters in text messages: they were getting in the way of fast and efficient communication, so they were pruned away. Then, within five years, they were brought back, with a new purpose: SHOUTING, Distinctly Emphatic Tone, SaRcAsTiC MoCkErY, and so on. This helped communication, so it's stuck.



          It might start with a "random mutation", just by chance. One man in the town pronounces his /a/ a little more like [æ]. He teaches this pronunciation to his children, who might influence their peers, until everyone pronounces that vowel slightly more to the front. This starts crowding /æ/, so over time that starts to shift upward in order to remain distinct. And so on, and so on…a small initial shift like that can lead to a complete restructuring of the vowel system, given enough time.






          share|improve this answer
























          • Hmm, but if this was just random, this sounds like it would take an awful long time for things to spread. On the other hand, if it was by people of influence, or importance, I can see that people would tend to mimic those people they admire. Just as people mimic the royal family's clothes, and even Christmas. But then again slang terms originate by 1 or 2 people and they can spread quite fast. So maybe vowel sounds can too. But this seems like a more conscious effor to sound cool than purely randomness. (Like when Londoners started mimicking the accent of the Beatles or Oasis.)

            – zooby
            5 hours ago













          • @zooby Depends! Children are extremely impressionable, linguistically, and it's very easy for them to pick up little quirks. But high-status people like the Royal Family do indeed tend to create their own standards: see "Received Pronunciation" or "the Queen's English".

            – Draconis
            4 hours ago











          • British English has changed too. Many features of American English are conservative.

            – Adam Bittlingmayer
            3 hours ago
















          2














          This does indeed happen! It tends to follow the same processes that make whole languages change over time. Just on a smaller scale: smaller area, smaller changes, smaller timespans. (Intuitive example: surely the first American colonists spoke "British English", since what would be the alternative? And look at what that's led to now.)



          One way to think of it is, language is a tool for communication, and if it's not serving its purpose, it'll evolve with ruthless efficiency until it is. For a dramatic example, look at how quickly people stopped using capital letters in text messages: they were getting in the way of fast and efficient communication, so they were pruned away. Then, within five years, they were brought back, with a new purpose: SHOUTING, Distinctly Emphatic Tone, SaRcAsTiC MoCkErY, and so on. This helped communication, so it's stuck.



          It might start with a "random mutation", just by chance. One man in the town pronounces his /a/ a little more like [æ]. He teaches this pronunciation to his children, who might influence their peers, until everyone pronounces that vowel slightly more to the front. This starts crowding /æ/, so over time that starts to shift upward in order to remain distinct. And so on, and so on…a small initial shift like that can lead to a complete restructuring of the vowel system, given enough time.






          share|improve this answer
























          • Hmm, but if this was just random, this sounds like it would take an awful long time for things to spread. On the other hand, if it was by people of influence, or importance, I can see that people would tend to mimic those people they admire. Just as people mimic the royal family's clothes, and even Christmas. But then again slang terms originate by 1 or 2 people and they can spread quite fast. So maybe vowel sounds can too. But this seems like a more conscious effor to sound cool than purely randomness. (Like when Londoners started mimicking the accent of the Beatles or Oasis.)

            – zooby
            5 hours ago













          • @zooby Depends! Children are extremely impressionable, linguistically, and it's very easy for them to pick up little quirks. But high-status people like the Royal Family do indeed tend to create their own standards: see "Received Pronunciation" or "the Queen's English".

            – Draconis
            4 hours ago











          • British English has changed too. Many features of American English are conservative.

            – Adam Bittlingmayer
            3 hours ago














          2












          2








          2







          This does indeed happen! It tends to follow the same processes that make whole languages change over time. Just on a smaller scale: smaller area, smaller changes, smaller timespans. (Intuitive example: surely the first American colonists spoke "British English", since what would be the alternative? And look at what that's led to now.)



          One way to think of it is, language is a tool for communication, and if it's not serving its purpose, it'll evolve with ruthless efficiency until it is. For a dramatic example, look at how quickly people stopped using capital letters in text messages: they were getting in the way of fast and efficient communication, so they were pruned away. Then, within five years, they were brought back, with a new purpose: SHOUTING, Distinctly Emphatic Tone, SaRcAsTiC MoCkErY, and so on. This helped communication, so it's stuck.



          It might start with a "random mutation", just by chance. One man in the town pronounces his /a/ a little more like [æ]. He teaches this pronunciation to his children, who might influence their peers, until everyone pronounces that vowel slightly more to the front. This starts crowding /æ/, so over time that starts to shift upward in order to remain distinct. And so on, and so on…a small initial shift like that can lead to a complete restructuring of the vowel system, given enough time.






          share|improve this answer













          This does indeed happen! It tends to follow the same processes that make whole languages change over time. Just on a smaller scale: smaller area, smaller changes, smaller timespans. (Intuitive example: surely the first American colonists spoke "British English", since what would be the alternative? And look at what that's led to now.)



          One way to think of it is, language is a tool for communication, and if it's not serving its purpose, it'll evolve with ruthless efficiency until it is. For a dramatic example, look at how quickly people stopped using capital letters in text messages: they were getting in the way of fast and efficient communication, so they were pruned away. Then, within five years, they were brought back, with a new purpose: SHOUTING, Distinctly Emphatic Tone, SaRcAsTiC MoCkErY, and so on. This helped communication, so it's stuck.



          It might start with a "random mutation", just by chance. One man in the town pronounces his /a/ a little more like [æ]. He teaches this pronunciation to his children, who might influence their peers, until everyone pronounces that vowel slightly more to the front. This starts crowding /æ/, so over time that starts to shift upward in order to remain distinct. And so on, and so on…a small initial shift like that can lead to a complete restructuring of the vowel system, given enough time.







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered 5 hours ago









          DraconisDraconis

          15.9k1 gold badge24 silver badges66 bronze badges




          15.9k1 gold badge24 silver badges66 bronze badges













          • Hmm, but if this was just random, this sounds like it would take an awful long time for things to spread. On the other hand, if it was by people of influence, or importance, I can see that people would tend to mimic those people they admire. Just as people mimic the royal family's clothes, and even Christmas. But then again slang terms originate by 1 or 2 people and they can spread quite fast. So maybe vowel sounds can too. But this seems like a more conscious effor to sound cool than purely randomness. (Like when Londoners started mimicking the accent of the Beatles or Oasis.)

            – zooby
            5 hours ago













          • @zooby Depends! Children are extremely impressionable, linguistically, and it's very easy for them to pick up little quirks. But high-status people like the Royal Family do indeed tend to create their own standards: see "Received Pronunciation" or "the Queen's English".

            – Draconis
            4 hours ago











          • British English has changed too. Many features of American English are conservative.

            – Adam Bittlingmayer
            3 hours ago



















          • Hmm, but if this was just random, this sounds like it would take an awful long time for things to spread. On the other hand, if it was by people of influence, or importance, I can see that people would tend to mimic those people they admire. Just as people mimic the royal family's clothes, and even Christmas. But then again slang terms originate by 1 or 2 people and they can spread quite fast. So maybe vowel sounds can too. But this seems like a more conscious effor to sound cool than purely randomness. (Like when Londoners started mimicking the accent of the Beatles or Oasis.)

            – zooby
            5 hours ago













          • @zooby Depends! Children are extremely impressionable, linguistically, and it's very easy for them to pick up little quirks. But high-status people like the Royal Family do indeed tend to create their own standards: see "Received Pronunciation" or "the Queen's English".

            – Draconis
            4 hours ago











          • British English has changed too. Many features of American English are conservative.

            – Adam Bittlingmayer
            3 hours ago

















          Hmm, but if this was just random, this sounds like it would take an awful long time for things to spread. On the other hand, if it was by people of influence, or importance, I can see that people would tend to mimic those people they admire. Just as people mimic the royal family's clothes, and even Christmas. But then again slang terms originate by 1 or 2 people and they can spread quite fast. So maybe vowel sounds can too. But this seems like a more conscious effor to sound cool than purely randomness. (Like when Londoners started mimicking the accent of the Beatles or Oasis.)

          – zooby
          5 hours ago







          Hmm, but if this was just random, this sounds like it would take an awful long time for things to spread. On the other hand, if it was by people of influence, or importance, I can see that people would tend to mimic those people they admire. Just as people mimic the royal family's clothes, and even Christmas. But then again slang terms originate by 1 or 2 people and they can spread quite fast. So maybe vowel sounds can too. But this seems like a more conscious effor to sound cool than purely randomness. (Like when Londoners started mimicking the accent of the Beatles or Oasis.)

          – zooby
          5 hours ago















          @zooby Depends! Children are extremely impressionable, linguistically, and it's very easy for them to pick up little quirks. But high-status people like the Royal Family do indeed tend to create their own standards: see "Received Pronunciation" or "the Queen's English".

          – Draconis
          4 hours ago





          @zooby Depends! Children are extremely impressionable, linguistically, and it's very easy for them to pick up little quirks. But high-status people like the Royal Family do indeed tend to create their own standards: see "Received Pronunciation" or "the Queen's English".

          – Draconis
          4 hours ago













          British English has changed too. Many features of American English are conservative.

          – Adam Bittlingmayer
          3 hours ago





          British English has changed too. Many features of American English are conservative.

          – Adam Bittlingmayer
          3 hours ago


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Linguistics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2flinguistics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f31798%2fhow-do-accents-of-a-whole-town-drift%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Taj Mahal Inhaltsverzeichnis Aufbau | Geschichte | 350-Jahr-Feier | Heutige Bedeutung | Siehe auch |...

          Baia Sprie Cuprins Etimologie | Istorie | Demografie | Politică și administrație | Arii naturale...

          Nicolae Petrescu-Găină Cuprins Biografie | Opera | In memoriam | Varia | Controverse, incertitudini...