Short and long term plans in a closed game in the Sicilian DefenseThe theory of pawn breaksWhat is a good,...

What do you call a weak person's act of taking on bigger opponents?

First-year PhD giving a talk among well-established researchers in the field

Should I include salary information on my CV?

Going to get married soon, should I do it on Dec 31 or Jan 1?

Change the boot order with no option in UEFI settings

Why is the Turkish president's surname spelt in Russian as Эрдоган, with г?

Can a Horncaller control a Druid who is using Wild Shape?

Should I tell my insurance company I'm making payments on my new car?

ては's role in this 「追いかけては来ないでしょう」

Would a two-seat light aircaft with a landing speed of 20 knots and a top speed of 180 knots be technically possible?

What kind of wire should I use to pigtail an outlet?

Short and long term plans in a closed game in the Sicilian Defense

Using “sparkling” as a diminutive of “spark” in a poem

Why do some games show lights shine through walls?

Should I hide continue button until tasks are completed?

How to get cool night-vision without lame drawbacks?

Can’t attend PhD conferences

Why does the numerical solution of an ODE move away from an unstable equilibrium?

Do flight schools typically have dress codes or expectations?

Require advice on power conservation for backpacking trip

Why would people reject a god's purely beneficial blessing?

Smooth Julia set for quadratic polynomials

What happens when I sacrifice a creature when my Teysa Karlov is on the battlefield?

Does squid ink pasta bleed?



Short and long term plans in a closed game in the Sicilian Defense


The theory of pawn breaksWhat is a good, aggressive response against the Sicilian Defense?An Aggressive Response (for black) against the closed sicilian?How should black meet 2.d4 in the Sicilian Defense?How Does The Sicilian Defense Work?What are the advantage of sicilian defense for black?What should be my plan?Sicilian defense answer to Bc4 and Qf3How does black break into the position? What is a good plan for black?How good is this variant of the Sicilian defense?






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}







1















Today, I have played a game as Black.



I reached this position, with Black to play:
enter image description here



The position, as you can see, is closed. The truth is that I had difficulty finding a plan here, considering the pawn structure, what are potential short and long term plans?



My Thoughts:
There are no open files yet and the weakest point in White structure, which is located at d3, is by no means weak.



I considered moving a knight to g4 with the idea of exchanging with the dark-coloured bishop. But such an exchange would only put a pawn on e3, which would help White challenge the control of the dark squares. Thus, I quicky discarded this plan as I should be aiming to control the dark squares.



However, I am not sure what is the right plan. I guess that my plan should be preventing a d4 break by Qhite.



Can someone help me figure out a strategy for this game?



Note: I know that the computer suggests c4, but I am interested in a long term plan too. This is because, after that, there are no more breaks for me to aim for.










share|improve this question































    1















    Today, I have played a game as Black.



    I reached this position, with Black to play:
    enter image description here



    The position, as you can see, is closed. The truth is that I had difficulty finding a plan here, considering the pawn structure, what are potential short and long term plans?



    My Thoughts:
    There are no open files yet and the weakest point in White structure, which is located at d3, is by no means weak.



    I considered moving a knight to g4 with the idea of exchanging with the dark-coloured bishop. But such an exchange would only put a pawn on e3, which would help White challenge the control of the dark squares. Thus, I quicky discarded this plan as I should be aiming to control the dark squares.



    However, I am not sure what is the right plan. I guess that my plan should be preventing a d4 break by Qhite.



    Can someone help me figure out a strategy for this game?



    Note: I know that the computer suggests c4, but I am interested in a long term plan too. This is because, after that, there are no more breaks for me to aim for.










    share|improve this question



























      1












      1








      1








      Today, I have played a game as Black.



      I reached this position, with Black to play:
      enter image description here



      The position, as you can see, is closed. The truth is that I had difficulty finding a plan here, considering the pawn structure, what are potential short and long term plans?



      My Thoughts:
      There are no open files yet and the weakest point in White structure, which is located at d3, is by no means weak.



      I considered moving a knight to g4 with the idea of exchanging with the dark-coloured bishop. But such an exchange would only put a pawn on e3, which would help White challenge the control of the dark squares. Thus, I quicky discarded this plan as I should be aiming to control the dark squares.



      However, I am not sure what is the right plan. I guess that my plan should be preventing a d4 break by Qhite.



      Can someone help me figure out a strategy for this game?



      Note: I know that the computer suggests c4, but I am interested in a long term plan too. This is because, after that, there are no more breaks for me to aim for.










      share|improve this question
















      Today, I have played a game as Black.



      I reached this position, with Black to play:
      enter image description here



      The position, as you can see, is closed. The truth is that I had difficulty finding a plan here, considering the pawn structure, what are potential short and long term plans?



      My Thoughts:
      There are no open files yet and the weakest point in White structure, which is located at d3, is by no means weak.



      I considered moving a knight to g4 with the idea of exchanging with the dark-coloured bishop. But such an exchange would only put a pawn on e3, which would help White challenge the control of the dark squares. Thus, I quicky discarded this plan as I should be aiming to control the dark squares.



      However, I am not sure what is the right plan. I guess that my plan should be preventing a d4 break by Qhite.



      Can someone help me figure out a strategy for this game?



      Note: I know that the computer suggests c4, but I am interested in a long term plan too. This is because, after that, there are no more breaks for me to aim for.







      sicilian-defense positional-play planning closed-position






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited 4 hours ago







      Maths64

















      asked 8 hours ago









      Maths64Maths64

      5143 silver badges14 bronze badges




      5143 silver badges14 bronze badges






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          4














          Before we talk planning, you can see from the diagram arrows that the tactical line 12.Nxd3 followed by c4 is available. A trade of c&b pawns for Whites e&d pawns = the center is Blacks; not to mention the monster on b7 is unopposed.



          On to abstract thinking:




          "I considered moving a knight to g4 with the idea of exchanging with
          the dark-coloured bishop but such exchange would only give a pawn on
          e3 which would challenge the control of the dark squares."




          This line of thinking is extremely flawed!



          Trading a knight for a bishop is rarely a bad idea. Doubling the opponents pawns is also rarely a bad idea.
          In this particular case it is a good idea! Remember, doubled pawns have difficulty with mobility, and are therefore inherently weak. What do you think controls more dark squares, the Bishop on e3 or a pawn on e3?



          Now, in general when the center is fluid, you need to be thinking about the center. "He who controls the spice controls the universe." and he who controls the center drives the battle.



          So apart from the tactics available your planning should be around finishing development with an eye to conquering the center.



          This position is so dynamic and full of tactics that it requires more concrete calculation than a long-term plan.






          share|improve this answer
























          • Sorry, my writing was not clear enough. I meant that White after the exchange would challenge the control of the dark squares. I knew that the bishop knight exchange would give a strong doubled pawn just as you have justified.

            – Maths64
            7 hours ago











          • I am editing it now so no more confussion is caused.

            – Maths64
            7 hours ago














          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "435"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fchess.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f24755%2fshort-and-long-term-plans-in-a-closed-game-in-the-sicilian-defense%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          4














          Before we talk planning, you can see from the diagram arrows that the tactical line 12.Nxd3 followed by c4 is available. A trade of c&b pawns for Whites e&d pawns = the center is Blacks; not to mention the monster on b7 is unopposed.



          On to abstract thinking:




          "I considered moving a knight to g4 with the idea of exchanging with
          the dark-coloured bishop but such exchange would only give a pawn on
          e3 which would challenge the control of the dark squares."




          This line of thinking is extremely flawed!



          Trading a knight for a bishop is rarely a bad idea. Doubling the opponents pawns is also rarely a bad idea.
          In this particular case it is a good idea! Remember, doubled pawns have difficulty with mobility, and are therefore inherently weak. What do you think controls more dark squares, the Bishop on e3 or a pawn on e3?



          Now, in general when the center is fluid, you need to be thinking about the center. "He who controls the spice controls the universe." and he who controls the center drives the battle.



          So apart from the tactics available your planning should be around finishing development with an eye to conquering the center.



          This position is so dynamic and full of tactics that it requires more concrete calculation than a long-term plan.






          share|improve this answer
























          • Sorry, my writing was not clear enough. I meant that White after the exchange would challenge the control of the dark squares. I knew that the bishop knight exchange would give a strong doubled pawn just as you have justified.

            – Maths64
            7 hours ago











          • I am editing it now so no more confussion is caused.

            – Maths64
            7 hours ago
















          4














          Before we talk planning, you can see from the diagram arrows that the tactical line 12.Nxd3 followed by c4 is available. A trade of c&b pawns for Whites e&d pawns = the center is Blacks; not to mention the monster on b7 is unopposed.



          On to abstract thinking:




          "I considered moving a knight to g4 with the idea of exchanging with
          the dark-coloured bishop but such exchange would only give a pawn on
          e3 which would challenge the control of the dark squares."




          This line of thinking is extremely flawed!



          Trading a knight for a bishop is rarely a bad idea. Doubling the opponents pawns is also rarely a bad idea.
          In this particular case it is a good idea! Remember, doubled pawns have difficulty with mobility, and are therefore inherently weak. What do you think controls more dark squares, the Bishop on e3 or a pawn on e3?



          Now, in general when the center is fluid, you need to be thinking about the center. "He who controls the spice controls the universe." and he who controls the center drives the battle.



          So apart from the tactics available your planning should be around finishing development with an eye to conquering the center.



          This position is so dynamic and full of tactics that it requires more concrete calculation than a long-term plan.






          share|improve this answer
























          • Sorry, my writing was not clear enough. I meant that White after the exchange would challenge the control of the dark squares. I knew that the bishop knight exchange would give a strong doubled pawn just as you have justified.

            – Maths64
            7 hours ago











          • I am editing it now so no more confussion is caused.

            – Maths64
            7 hours ago














          4












          4








          4







          Before we talk planning, you can see from the diagram arrows that the tactical line 12.Nxd3 followed by c4 is available. A trade of c&b pawns for Whites e&d pawns = the center is Blacks; not to mention the monster on b7 is unopposed.



          On to abstract thinking:




          "I considered moving a knight to g4 with the idea of exchanging with
          the dark-coloured bishop but such exchange would only give a pawn on
          e3 which would challenge the control of the dark squares."




          This line of thinking is extremely flawed!



          Trading a knight for a bishop is rarely a bad idea. Doubling the opponents pawns is also rarely a bad idea.
          In this particular case it is a good idea! Remember, doubled pawns have difficulty with mobility, and are therefore inherently weak. What do you think controls more dark squares, the Bishop on e3 or a pawn on e3?



          Now, in general when the center is fluid, you need to be thinking about the center. "He who controls the spice controls the universe." and he who controls the center drives the battle.



          So apart from the tactics available your planning should be around finishing development with an eye to conquering the center.



          This position is so dynamic and full of tactics that it requires more concrete calculation than a long-term plan.






          share|improve this answer













          Before we talk planning, you can see from the diagram arrows that the tactical line 12.Nxd3 followed by c4 is available. A trade of c&b pawns for Whites e&d pawns = the center is Blacks; not to mention the monster on b7 is unopposed.



          On to abstract thinking:




          "I considered moving a knight to g4 with the idea of exchanging with
          the dark-coloured bishop but such exchange would only give a pawn on
          e3 which would challenge the control of the dark squares."




          This line of thinking is extremely flawed!



          Trading a knight for a bishop is rarely a bad idea. Doubling the opponents pawns is also rarely a bad idea.
          In this particular case it is a good idea! Remember, doubled pawns have difficulty with mobility, and are therefore inherently weak. What do you think controls more dark squares, the Bishop on e3 or a pawn on e3?



          Now, in general when the center is fluid, you need to be thinking about the center. "He who controls the spice controls the universe." and he who controls the center drives the battle.



          So apart from the tactics available your planning should be around finishing development with an eye to conquering the center.



          This position is so dynamic and full of tactics that it requires more concrete calculation than a long-term plan.







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered 7 hours ago









          YwapomYwapom

          3,5734 silver badges22 bronze badges




          3,5734 silver badges22 bronze badges













          • Sorry, my writing was not clear enough. I meant that White after the exchange would challenge the control of the dark squares. I knew that the bishop knight exchange would give a strong doubled pawn just as you have justified.

            – Maths64
            7 hours ago











          • I am editing it now so no more confussion is caused.

            – Maths64
            7 hours ago



















          • Sorry, my writing was not clear enough. I meant that White after the exchange would challenge the control of the dark squares. I knew that the bishop knight exchange would give a strong doubled pawn just as you have justified.

            – Maths64
            7 hours ago











          • I am editing it now so no more confussion is caused.

            – Maths64
            7 hours ago

















          Sorry, my writing was not clear enough. I meant that White after the exchange would challenge the control of the dark squares. I knew that the bishop knight exchange would give a strong doubled pawn just as you have justified.

          – Maths64
          7 hours ago





          Sorry, my writing was not clear enough. I meant that White after the exchange would challenge the control of the dark squares. I knew that the bishop knight exchange would give a strong doubled pawn just as you have justified.

          – Maths64
          7 hours ago













          I am editing it now so no more confussion is caused.

          – Maths64
          7 hours ago





          I am editing it now so no more confussion is caused.

          – Maths64
          7 hours ago


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Chess Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fchess.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f24755%2fshort-and-long-term-plans-in-a-closed-game-in-the-sicilian-defense%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Taj Mahal Inhaltsverzeichnis Aufbau | Geschichte | 350-Jahr-Feier | Heutige Bedeutung | Siehe auch |...

          Baia Sprie Cuprins Etimologie | Istorie | Demografie | Politică și administrație | Arii naturale...

          Nicolae Petrescu-Găină Cuprins Biografie | Opera | In memoriam | Varia | Controverse, incertitudini...