Symbolic equivalent of chmod 400problem with chmod commandautomatically set sudo chmod 777Understanding chmod...
Could Sauron have read Tom Bombadil's mind if Tom had held the Palantir?
Does the UK have a written constitution?
Should I tell my insurance company I'm making payments on my new car?
How come I was asked by a CBP officer why I was in the US?
Do equal angles necessarily mean a polygon is regular?
Should my manager be aware of private LinkedIn approaches I receive? How to politely have this happen?
Alphabet completion rate
Can a US President have someone sent to prison?
Is it okay to visually align the elements in a logo?
Do French speakers not use the subjunctive informally?
What is this opening trap called, and how should I play afterwards? How can I refute the gambit, and play if I accept it?
How risky is real estate?
Why would people reject a god's purely beneficial blessing?
Should I hide continue button until tasks are completed?
Analog is Obtuse!
Why isn’t the tax system continuous rather than bracketed?
Do I recheck baggage at stopovers MCI-SEA-ICN-SGN? Delta and Korean Air
Is it OK to bottle condition using previously contaminated bottles?
Fitting a mixture of two normal distributions for a data set?
Is adding a new player (or players) a DM decision, or a group decision?
What determines the "strength of impact" of a falling object on the ground, momentum or energy?
How can I repair scratches on a painted French door?
Links to webpages in books
What is the line crossing the Pacific Ocean that is shown on maps?
Symbolic equivalent of chmod 400
problem with chmod commandautomatically set sudo chmod 777Understanding chmod Symbolic Notation and use of OctalWhat is the Ubuntu equivalent of OSX `chmod -h` flag?Incorrectly ran chmod 754Chmod -r issuesAfter doing chmod 400 on /usr the sudo command is not workingConfusion in chmod optionschmod 400 will not change the permissions of a fileCannot change file permission after chmod 400
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}
The following is often used to set file permissions, a good example being setting a key file to an appropriate permission level to be used by ssh (this being the "octal" form):
chmod 400 filename.xyz
Would it be a correct equivalent and acceptable practice to use the following instead (this is the "symbolic" form)?
chmod a=,u=r filename.xyz
The reason I ask is that it seems a bit clearer for code readability. Still not exactly human readable, but no bit mapping needed.
If maximum readibility (and not terseness) were the primary driver, would there be a better option?
permissions chmod
add a comment |
The following is often used to set file permissions, a good example being setting a key file to an appropriate permission level to be used by ssh (this being the "octal" form):
chmod 400 filename.xyz
Would it be a correct equivalent and acceptable practice to use the following instead (this is the "symbolic" form)?
chmod a=,u=r filename.xyz
The reason I ask is that it seems a bit clearer for code readability. Still not exactly human readable, but no bit mapping needed.
If maximum readibility (and not terseness) were the primary driver, would there be a better option?
permissions chmod
add a comment |
The following is often used to set file permissions, a good example being setting a key file to an appropriate permission level to be used by ssh (this being the "octal" form):
chmod 400 filename.xyz
Would it be a correct equivalent and acceptable practice to use the following instead (this is the "symbolic" form)?
chmod a=,u=r filename.xyz
The reason I ask is that it seems a bit clearer for code readability. Still not exactly human readable, but no bit mapping needed.
If maximum readibility (and not terseness) were the primary driver, would there be a better option?
permissions chmod
The following is often used to set file permissions, a good example being setting a key file to an appropriate permission level to be used by ssh (this being the "octal" form):
chmod 400 filename.xyz
Would it be a correct equivalent and acceptable practice to use the following instead (this is the "symbolic" form)?
chmod a=,u=r filename.xyz
The reason I ask is that it seems a bit clearer for code readability. Still not exactly human readable, but no bit mapping needed.
If maximum readibility (and not terseness) were the primary driver, would there be a better option?
permissions chmod
permissions chmod
asked 8 hours ago
GaTechThomasGaTechThomas
1112 bronze badges
1112 bronze badges
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
With a=,u=r
, the order is important. If you accidentally swap the order of a=
and u=r
(or the order of a=
and u=
), the result would be very different. (Yes, a
and u
are pretty far from each other on a QWERTY keyboard, but someone looking at a reference doc and manually typing things in might mess up between the two very similar looking parts.) For maximum readability and safety, I'd be more explicit:
chmod u=r,go-rwx filename # or go-rwxst
The permission components are very different here, and way more explicit, making mistakes less likely to happen. And it doesn't matter if you have go-rwx
first or u=r
first.
New contributor
That makes a lot of sense.
– GaTechThomas
8 hours ago
Did you mean "u=r" at the very end of the answer?
– GaTechThomas
8 hours ago
@GaTechThomas I did, thanks! Fixed the typo.
– chmod a-rwx
8 hours ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "89"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f1153204%2fsymbolic-equivalent-of-chmod-400%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
With a=,u=r
, the order is important. If you accidentally swap the order of a=
and u=r
(or the order of a=
and u=
), the result would be very different. (Yes, a
and u
are pretty far from each other on a QWERTY keyboard, but someone looking at a reference doc and manually typing things in might mess up between the two very similar looking parts.) For maximum readability and safety, I'd be more explicit:
chmod u=r,go-rwx filename # or go-rwxst
The permission components are very different here, and way more explicit, making mistakes less likely to happen. And it doesn't matter if you have go-rwx
first or u=r
first.
New contributor
That makes a lot of sense.
– GaTechThomas
8 hours ago
Did you mean "u=r" at the very end of the answer?
– GaTechThomas
8 hours ago
@GaTechThomas I did, thanks! Fixed the typo.
– chmod a-rwx
8 hours ago
add a comment |
With a=,u=r
, the order is important. If you accidentally swap the order of a=
and u=r
(or the order of a=
and u=
), the result would be very different. (Yes, a
and u
are pretty far from each other on a QWERTY keyboard, but someone looking at a reference doc and manually typing things in might mess up between the two very similar looking parts.) For maximum readability and safety, I'd be more explicit:
chmod u=r,go-rwx filename # or go-rwxst
The permission components are very different here, and way more explicit, making mistakes less likely to happen. And it doesn't matter if you have go-rwx
first or u=r
first.
New contributor
That makes a lot of sense.
– GaTechThomas
8 hours ago
Did you mean "u=r" at the very end of the answer?
– GaTechThomas
8 hours ago
@GaTechThomas I did, thanks! Fixed the typo.
– chmod a-rwx
8 hours ago
add a comment |
With a=,u=r
, the order is important. If you accidentally swap the order of a=
and u=r
(or the order of a=
and u=
), the result would be very different. (Yes, a
and u
are pretty far from each other on a QWERTY keyboard, but someone looking at a reference doc and manually typing things in might mess up between the two very similar looking parts.) For maximum readability and safety, I'd be more explicit:
chmod u=r,go-rwx filename # or go-rwxst
The permission components are very different here, and way more explicit, making mistakes less likely to happen. And it doesn't matter if you have go-rwx
first or u=r
first.
New contributor
With a=,u=r
, the order is important. If you accidentally swap the order of a=
and u=r
(or the order of a=
and u=
), the result would be very different. (Yes, a
and u
are pretty far from each other on a QWERTY keyboard, but someone looking at a reference doc and manually typing things in might mess up between the two very similar looking parts.) For maximum readability and safety, I'd be more explicit:
chmod u=r,go-rwx filename # or go-rwxst
The permission components are very different here, and way more explicit, making mistakes less likely to happen. And it doesn't matter if you have go-rwx
first or u=r
first.
New contributor
edited 6 hours ago
New contributor
answered 8 hours ago
chmod a-rwxchmod a-rwx
412 bronze badges
412 bronze badges
New contributor
New contributor
That makes a lot of sense.
– GaTechThomas
8 hours ago
Did you mean "u=r" at the very end of the answer?
– GaTechThomas
8 hours ago
@GaTechThomas I did, thanks! Fixed the typo.
– chmod a-rwx
8 hours ago
add a comment |
That makes a lot of sense.
– GaTechThomas
8 hours ago
Did you mean "u=r" at the very end of the answer?
– GaTechThomas
8 hours ago
@GaTechThomas I did, thanks! Fixed the typo.
– chmod a-rwx
8 hours ago
That makes a lot of sense.
– GaTechThomas
8 hours ago
That makes a lot of sense.
– GaTechThomas
8 hours ago
Did you mean "u=r" at the very end of the answer?
– GaTechThomas
8 hours ago
Did you mean "u=r" at the very end of the answer?
– GaTechThomas
8 hours ago
@GaTechThomas I did, thanks! Fixed the typo.
– chmod a-rwx
8 hours ago
@GaTechThomas I did, thanks! Fixed the typo.
– chmod a-rwx
8 hours ago
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Ask Ubuntu!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f1153204%2fsymbolic-equivalent-of-chmod-400%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown