Symbolic equivalent of chmod 400problem with chmod commandautomatically set sudo chmod 777Understanding chmod...

Could Sauron have read Tom Bombadil's mind if Tom had held the Palantir?

Does the UK have a written constitution?

Should I tell my insurance company I'm making payments on my new car?

How come I was asked by a CBP officer why I was in the US?

Do equal angles necessarily mean a polygon is regular?

Should my manager be aware of private LinkedIn approaches I receive? How to politely have this happen?

Alphabet completion rate

Can a US President have someone sent to prison?

Is it okay to visually align the elements in a logo?

Do French speakers not use the subjunctive informally?

What is this opening trap called, and how should I play afterwards? How can I refute the gambit, and play if I accept it?

How risky is real estate?

Why would people reject a god's purely beneficial blessing?

Should I hide continue button until tasks are completed?

Analog is Obtuse!

Why isn’t the tax system continuous rather than bracketed?

Do I recheck baggage at stopovers MCI-SEA-ICN-SGN? Delta and Korean Air

Is it OK to bottle condition using previously contaminated bottles?

Fitting a mixture of two normal distributions for a data set?

Is adding a new player (or players) a DM decision, or a group decision?

What determines the "strength of impact" of a falling object on the ground, momentum or energy?

How can I repair scratches on a painted French door?

Links to webpages in books

What is the line crossing the Pacific Ocean that is shown on maps?



Symbolic equivalent of chmod 400


problem with chmod commandautomatically set sudo chmod 777Understanding chmod Symbolic Notation and use of OctalWhat is the Ubuntu equivalent of OSX `chmod -h` flag?Incorrectly ran chmod 754Chmod -r issuesAfter doing chmod 400 on /usr the sudo command is not workingConfusion in chmod optionschmod 400 will not change the permissions of a fileCannot change file permission after chmod 400






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}







2















The following is often used to set file permissions, a good example being setting a key file to an appropriate permission level to be used by ssh (this being the "octal" form):



chmod 400 filename.xyz


Would it be a correct equivalent and acceptable practice to use the following instead (this is the "symbolic" form)?



chmod a=,u=r filename.xyz


The reason I ask is that it seems a bit clearer for code readability. Still not exactly human readable, but no bit mapping needed.



If maximum readibility (and not terseness) were the primary driver, would there be a better option?










share|improve this question





























    2















    The following is often used to set file permissions, a good example being setting a key file to an appropriate permission level to be used by ssh (this being the "octal" form):



    chmod 400 filename.xyz


    Would it be a correct equivalent and acceptable practice to use the following instead (this is the "symbolic" form)?



    chmod a=,u=r filename.xyz


    The reason I ask is that it seems a bit clearer for code readability. Still not exactly human readable, but no bit mapping needed.



    If maximum readibility (and not terseness) were the primary driver, would there be a better option?










    share|improve this question

























      2












      2








      2








      The following is often used to set file permissions, a good example being setting a key file to an appropriate permission level to be used by ssh (this being the "octal" form):



      chmod 400 filename.xyz


      Would it be a correct equivalent and acceptable practice to use the following instead (this is the "symbolic" form)?



      chmod a=,u=r filename.xyz


      The reason I ask is that it seems a bit clearer for code readability. Still not exactly human readable, but no bit mapping needed.



      If maximum readibility (and not terseness) were the primary driver, would there be a better option?










      share|improve this question














      The following is often used to set file permissions, a good example being setting a key file to an appropriate permission level to be used by ssh (this being the "octal" form):



      chmod 400 filename.xyz


      Would it be a correct equivalent and acceptable practice to use the following instead (this is the "symbolic" form)?



      chmod a=,u=r filename.xyz


      The reason I ask is that it seems a bit clearer for code readability. Still not exactly human readable, but no bit mapping needed.



      If maximum readibility (and not terseness) were the primary driver, would there be a better option?







      permissions chmod






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked 8 hours ago









      GaTechThomasGaTechThomas

      1112 bronze badges




      1112 bronze badges






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          4














          With a=,u=r, the order is important. If you accidentally swap the order of a= and u=r (or the order of a= and u=), the result would be very different. (Yes, a and u are pretty far from each other on a QWERTY keyboard, but someone looking at a reference doc and manually typing things in might mess up between the two very similar looking parts.) For maximum readability and safety, I'd be more explicit:



          chmod u=r,go-rwx filename # or go-rwxst


          The permission components are very different here, and way more explicit, making mistakes less likely to happen. And it doesn't matter if you have go-rwx first or u=r first.






          share|improve this answer










          New contributor



          chmod a-rwx is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.




















          • That makes a lot of sense.

            – GaTechThomas
            8 hours ago











          • Did you mean "u=r" at the very end of the answer?

            – GaTechThomas
            8 hours ago











          • @GaTechThomas I did, thanks! Fixed the typo.

            – chmod a-rwx
            8 hours ago














          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "89"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f1153204%2fsymbolic-equivalent-of-chmod-400%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          4














          With a=,u=r, the order is important. If you accidentally swap the order of a= and u=r (or the order of a= and u=), the result would be very different. (Yes, a and u are pretty far from each other on a QWERTY keyboard, but someone looking at a reference doc and manually typing things in might mess up between the two very similar looking parts.) For maximum readability and safety, I'd be more explicit:



          chmod u=r,go-rwx filename # or go-rwxst


          The permission components are very different here, and way more explicit, making mistakes less likely to happen. And it doesn't matter if you have go-rwx first or u=r first.






          share|improve this answer










          New contributor



          chmod a-rwx is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.




















          • That makes a lot of sense.

            – GaTechThomas
            8 hours ago











          • Did you mean "u=r" at the very end of the answer?

            – GaTechThomas
            8 hours ago











          • @GaTechThomas I did, thanks! Fixed the typo.

            – chmod a-rwx
            8 hours ago
















          4














          With a=,u=r, the order is important. If you accidentally swap the order of a= and u=r (or the order of a= and u=), the result would be very different. (Yes, a and u are pretty far from each other on a QWERTY keyboard, but someone looking at a reference doc and manually typing things in might mess up between the two very similar looking parts.) For maximum readability and safety, I'd be more explicit:



          chmod u=r,go-rwx filename # or go-rwxst


          The permission components are very different here, and way more explicit, making mistakes less likely to happen. And it doesn't matter if you have go-rwx first or u=r first.






          share|improve this answer










          New contributor



          chmod a-rwx is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.




















          • That makes a lot of sense.

            – GaTechThomas
            8 hours ago











          • Did you mean "u=r" at the very end of the answer?

            – GaTechThomas
            8 hours ago











          • @GaTechThomas I did, thanks! Fixed the typo.

            – chmod a-rwx
            8 hours ago














          4












          4








          4







          With a=,u=r, the order is important. If you accidentally swap the order of a= and u=r (or the order of a= and u=), the result would be very different. (Yes, a and u are pretty far from each other on a QWERTY keyboard, but someone looking at a reference doc and manually typing things in might mess up between the two very similar looking parts.) For maximum readability and safety, I'd be more explicit:



          chmod u=r,go-rwx filename # or go-rwxst


          The permission components are very different here, and way more explicit, making mistakes less likely to happen. And it doesn't matter if you have go-rwx first or u=r first.






          share|improve this answer










          New contributor



          chmod a-rwx is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.









          With a=,u=r, the order is important. If you accidentally swap the order of a= and u=r (or the order of a= and u=), the result would be very different. (Yes, a and u are pretty far from each other on a QWERTY keyboard, but someone looking at a reference doc and manually typing things in might mess up between the two very similar looking parts.) For maximum readability and safety, I'd be more explicit:



          chmod u=r,go-rwx filename # or go-rwxst


          The permission components are very different here, and way more explicit, making mistakes less likely to happen. And it doesn't matter if you have go-rwx first or u=r first.







          share|improve this answer










          New contributor



          chmod a-rwx is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.








          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited 6 hours ago





















          New contributor



          chmod a-rwx is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.








          answered 8 hours ago









          chmod a-rwxchmod a-rwx

          412 bronze badges




          412 bronze badges




          New contributor



          chmod a-rwx is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.




          New contributor




          chmod a-rwx is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.















          • That makes a lot of sense.

            – GaTechThomas
            8 hours ago











          • Did you mean "u=r" at the very end of the answer?

            – GaTechThomas
            8 hours ago











          • @GaTechThomas I did, thanks! Fixed the typo.

            – chmod a-rwx
            8 hours ago



















          • That makes a lot of sense.

            – GaTechThomas
            8 hours ago











          • Did you mean "u=r" at the very end of the answer?

            – GaTechThomas
            8 hours ago











          • @GaTechThomas I did, thanks! Fixed the typo.

            – chmod a-rwx
            8 hours ago

















          That makes a lot of sense.

          – GaTechThomas
          8 hours ago





          That makes a lot of sense.

          – GaTechThomas
          8 hours ago













          Did you mean "u=r" at the very end of the answer?

          – GaTechThomas
          8 hours ago





          Did you mean "u=r" at the very end of the answer?

          – GaTechThomas
          8 hours ago













          @GaTechThomas I did, thanks! Fixed the typo.

          – chmod a-rwx
          8 hours ago





          @GaTechThomas I did, thanks! Fixed the typo.

          – chmod a-rwx
          8 hours ago


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Ask Ubuntu!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f1153204%2fsymbolic-equivalent-of-chmod-400%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Taj Mahal Inhaltsverzeichnis Aufbau | Geschichte | 350-Jahr-Feier | Heutige Bedeutung | Siehe auch |...

          Baia Sprie Cuprins Etimologie | Istorie | Demografie | Politică și administrație | Arii naturale...

          Ciclooctatetraenă Vezi și | Bibliografie | Meniu de navigare637866text4148569-500570979m