What is the oldest commercial MS-DOS program that can run on modern versions of Windows without third-party...
Why is it easier to balance a non-moving bike standing up than sitting down?
Why isn't my calculation that we should be able to see the sun well beyond the observable universe valid?
What happened to Hopper's girlfriend in season one?
What was the first third-party commercial application for MS-DOS?
What is the highest voltage from the power supply a Raspberry Pi 3 B can handle without getting damaged?
How do I remove this inheritance-related code smell?
How can I ping multiple IP addresses at the same time?
What are Elsa's reasons for selecting the Holy Grail on behalf of Donovan?
How could empty set be unique if it could be vacuously false
macOS: How to take a picture from camera after 1 minute
Syntax and semantics of XDV commands (XeTeX)
Extending prime numbers digit by digit while retaining primality
In the US, can a former president run again?
Why is "Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation" necessary?
Why does independence imply zero correlation?
Find the common ancestor between two nodes of a tree
Why isn't it a compile-time error to return a nullptr as a std::string?
Has a life raft ever been successfully deployed on a modern commercial flight?
Counterfeit checks were created for my account. How does this type of fraud work?
Designing a magic-compatible polearm
How long did the SR-71 take to get to cruising altitude?
Are there any individual aliens that have gained superpowers in the Marvel universe?
What triggered jesuits' ban on infinitesimals in 1632?
Methodology: Writing unit tests for another developer
What is the oldest commercial MS-DOS program that can run on modern versions of Windows without third-party software?
What was the first third-party commercial application for MS-DOS?What is the oldest computer capable of running a modern version of GNU/Linux?VT52 emulation for MS-DOS?Can I run Windows 98 and games from the same era on an AMD Duron CPU?What key factor led to the sudden commercial success of MS Windows with v3.0?What is the best choice for DOS for a 1990 80386 PC?Why did CP/M and MS-DOS used the BIOS drivers instead of their own drivers to access hardware?What DOS software can I test a QIC-02 tape drive with?Where was the DOS cdd utility from?Why did scandisk exist?What was the first third-party commercial application for MS-DOS?
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}
What is the oldest commercial MS-DOS program that can run on modern versions of Windows (such as Windows 8.1 or Windows 10) without third-party emulators?
history ms-dos ibm-pc
add a comment |
What is the oldest commercial MS-DOS program that can run on modern versions of Windows (such as Windows 8.1 or Windows 10) without third-party emulators?
history ms-dos ibm-pc
2
It's not the oldest, but I still have clients of mine running the MS-DOS version of my accounting software on 32-bit versions of Windows. I even offered to give them my Windows version for free, but as long as they keep paying me support money, I keep the software current (within reason). Specifically, payroll changes for tax revisions. The code itself was ported from Radio Shack Model I in the late 70's, I took over maintenance around 1985, currently MS-BASIC 7.1
– Bill Hileman
6 hours ago
2
@BillHileman wow, I would think cumulative tax code changes would eat you to death, I.E. the ever increasing complexity would exceed the limits of the legacy platform.
– Harper
2 hours ago
2
@Harper I made the system flexible enough that it's been able to keep up with the changes so far. The last major change I had to made was regarding FICA where a new ceiling was added where a different rate kicked-in, but it's been able to survive with just tax table data entry over all this time otherwise, and yes, payroll taxes are incredibly complex programming-wise.
– Bill Hileman
2 hours ago
I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because open-ended "find it for me"-style questions do not work well in the Stack Exchange model. There is no way of confirming the one, true answer, and questions like this inevitably attract a large number of potentially correct answers without specific references or facts to back them up. It is not a practical problem faced in the hobby of retrocomputing or when using vintage computer hardware or software.
– Cody Gray
17 mins ago
add a comment |
What is the oldest commercial MS-DOS program that can run on modern versions of Windows (such as Windows 8.1 or Windows 10) without third-party emulators?
history ms-dos ibm-pc
What is the oldest commercial MS-DOS program that can run on modern versions of Windows (such as Windows 8.1 or Windows 10) without third-party emulators?
history ms-dos ibm-pc
history ms-dos ibm-pc
asked 11 hours ago
AnixxAnixx
21225
21225
2
It's not the oldest, but I still have clients of mine running the MS-DOS version of my accounting software on 32-bit versions of Windows. I even offered to give them my Windows version for free, but as long as they keep paying me support money, I keep the software current (within reason). Specifically, payroll changes for tax revisions. The code itself was ported from Radio Shack Model I in the late 70's, I took over maintenance around 1985, currently MS-BASIC 7.1
– Bill Hileman
6 hours ago
2
@BillHileman wow, I would think cumulative tax code changes would eat you to death, I.E. the ever increasing complexity would exceed the limits of the legacy platform.
– Harper
2 hours ago
2
@Harper I made the system flexible enough that it's been able to keep up with the changes so far. The last major change I had to made was regarding FICA where a new ceiling was added where a different rate kicked-in, but it's been able to survive with just tax table data entry over all this time otherwise, and yes, payroll taxes are incredibly complex programming-wise.
– Bill Hileman
2 hours ago
I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because open-ended "find it for me"-style questions do not work well in the Stack Exchange model. There is no way of confirming the one, true answer, and questions like this inevitably attract a large number of potentially correct answers without specific references or facts to back them up. It is not a practical problem faced in the hobby of retrocomputing or when using vintage computer hardware or software.
– Cody Gray
17 mins ago
add a comment |
2
It's not the oldest, but I still have clients of mine running the MS-DOS version of my accounting software on 32-bit versions of Windows. I even offered to give them my Windows version for free, but as long as they keep paying me support money, I keep the software current (within reason). Specifically, payroll changes for tax revisions. The code itself was ported from Radio Shack Model I in the late 70's, I took over maintenance around 1985, currently MS-BASIC 7.1
– Bill Hileman
6 hours ago
2
@BillHileman wow, I would think cumulative tax code changes would eat you to death, I.E. the ever increasing complexity would exceed the limits of the legacy platform.
– Harper
2 hours ago
2
@Harper I made the system flexible enough that it's been able to keep up with the changes so far. The last major change I had to made was regarding FICA where a new ceiling was added where a different rate kicked-in, but it's been able to survive with just tax table data entry over all this time otherwise, and yes, payroll taxes are incredibly complex programming-wise.
– Bill Hileman
2 hours ago
I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because open-ended "find it for me"-style questions do not work well in the Stack Exchange model. There is no way of confirming the one, true answer, and questions like this inevitably attract a large number of potentially correct answers without specific references or facts to back them up. It is not a practical problem faced in the hobby of retrocomputing or when using vintage computer hardware or software.
– Cody Gray
17 mins ago
2
2
It's not the oldest, but I still have clients of mine running the MS-DOS version of my accounting software on 32-bit versions of Windows. I even offered to give them my Windows version for free, but as long as they keep paying me support money, I keep the software current (within reason). Specifically, payroll changes for tax revisions. The code itself was ported from Radio Shack Model I in the late 70's, I took over maintenance around 1985, currently MS-BASIC 7.1
– Bill Hileman
6 hours ago
It's not the oldest, but I still have clients of mine running the MS-DOS version of my accounting software on 32-bit versions of Windows. I even offered to give them my Windows version for free, but as long as they keep paying me support money, I keep the software current (within reason). Specifically, payroll changes for tax revisions. The code itself was ported from Radio Shack Model I in the late 70's, I took over maintenance around 1985, currently MS-BASIC 7.1
– Bill Hileman
6 hours ago
2
2
@BillHileman wow, I would think cumulative tax code changes would eat you to death, I.E. the ever increasing complexity would exceed the limits of the legacy platform.
– Harper
2 hours ago
@BillHileman wow, I would think cumulative tax code changes would eat you to death, I.E. the ever increasing complexity would exceed the limits of the legacy platform.
– Harper
2 hours ago
2
2
@Harper I made the system flexible enough that it's been able to keep up with the changes so far. The last major change I had to made was regarding FICA where a new ceiling was added where a different rate kicked-in, but it's been able to survive with just tax table data entry over all this time otherwise, and yes, payroll taxes are incredibly complex programming-wise.
– Bill Hileman
2 hours ago
@Harper I made the system flexible enough that it's been able to keep up with the changes so far. The last major change I had to made was regarding FICA where a new ceiling was added where a different rate kicked-in, but it's been able to survive with just tax table data entry over all this time otherwise, and yes, payroll taxes are incredibly complex programming-wise.
– Bill Hileman
2 hours ago
I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because open-ended "find it for me"-style questions do not work well in the Stack Exchange model. There is no way of confirming the one, true answer, and questions like this inevitably attract a large number of potentially correct answers without specific references or facts to back them up. It is not a practical problem faced in the hobby of retrocomputing or when using vintage computer hardware or software.
– Cody Gray
17 mins ago
I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because open-ended "find it for me"-style questions do not work well in the Stack Exchange model. There is no way of confirming the one, true answer, and questions like this inevitably attract a large number of potentially correct answers without specific references or facts to back them up. It is not a practical problem faced in the hobby of retrocomputing or when using vintage computer hardware or software.
– Cody Gray
17 mins ago
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
The 32-bit versions of Windows can still run many DOS binaries directly, using NTVDM, and VisiCalc stills works. VisiCalc was available at launch with the IBM PC, so is probably qualifies as the oldest commercial DOS program which can still run on modern versions of Windows without third-party software.
2
Does it in fact run?
– Anixx
10 hours ago
1
I can confirm that it will not run on 64 bit windows 7, but the answer notes 32 bit, and this confirms the exclusion.
– fred_dot_u
9 hours ago
Just confirmed it works on 32-bit Windows 7. Takes a little while to start (similar to runningdebug), which I believe/suspect is because it fires some kind of a 16-bit VM in which to run it.
– TripeHound
8 hours ago
@StephenKitt Looks like it is using NTVDM -- just that my machine is quite long in the tooth!
– TripeHound
8 hours ago
Just checked on Windows 10 Home 32-bit and it was using NTVDM to run MS-DOS programs.
– Ross Ridge
8 hours ago
|
show 2 more comments
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "648"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fretrocomputing.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f11385%2fwhat-is-the-oldest-commercial-ms-dos-program-that-can-run-on-modern-versions-of%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
The 32-bit versions of Windows can still run many DOS binaries directly, using NTVDM, and VisiCalc stills works. VisiCalc was available at launch with the IBM PC, so is probably qualifies as the oldest commercial DOS program which can still run on modern versions of Windows without third-party software.
2
Does it in fact run?
– Anixx
10 hours ago
1
I can confirm that it will not run on 64 bit windows 7, but the answer notes 32 bit, and this confirms the exclusion.
– fred_dot_u
9 hours ago
Just confirmed it works on 32-bit Windows 7. Takes a little while to start (similar to runningdebug), which I believe/suspect is because it fires some kind of a 16-bit VM in which to run it.
– TripeHound
8 hours ago
@StephenKitt Looks like it is using NTVDM -- just that my machine is quite long in the tooth!
– TripeHound
8 hours ago
Just checked on Windows 10 Home 32-bit and it was using NTVDM to run MS-DOS programs.
– Ross Ridge
8 hours ago
|
show 2 more comments
The 32-bit versions of Windows can still run many DOS binaries directly, using NTVDM, and VisiCalc stills works. VisiCalc was available at launch with the IBM PC, so is probably qualifies as the oldest commercial DOS program which can still run on modern versions of Windows without third-party software.
2
Does it in fact run?
– Anixx
10 hours ago
1
I can confirm that it will not run on 64 bit windows 7, but the answer notes 32 bit, and this confirms the exclusion.
– fred_dot_u
9 hours ago
Just confirmed it works on 32-bit Windows 7. Takes a little while to start (similar to runningdebug), which I believe/suspect is because it fires some kind of a 16-bit VM in which to run it.
– TripeHound
8 hours ago
@StephenKitt Looks like it is using NTVDM -- just that my machine is quite long in the tooth!
– TripeHound
8 hours ago
Just checked on Windows 10 Home 32-bit and it was using NTVDM to run MS-DOS programs.
– Ross Ridge
8 hours ago
|
show 2 more comments
The 32-bit versions of Windows can still run many DOS binaries directly, using NTVDM, and VisiCalc stills works. VisiCalc was available at launch with the IBM PC, so is probably qualifies as the oldest commercial DOS program which can still run on modern versions of Windows without third-party software.
The 32-bit versions of Windows can still run many DOS binaries directly, using NTVDM, and VisiCalc stills works. VisiCalc was available at launch with the IBM PC, so is probably qualifies as the oldest commercial DOS program which can still run on modern versions of Windows without third-party software.
edited 8 hours ago
answered 10 hours ago
Stephen KittStephen Kitt
45.3k8188192
45.3k8188192
2
Does it in fact run?
– Anixx
10 hours ago
1
I can confirm that it will not run on 64 bit windows 7, but the answer notes 32 bit, and this confirms the exclusion.
– fred_dot_u
9 hours ago
Just confirmed it works on 32-bit Windows 7. Takes a little while to start (similar to runningdebug), which I believe/suspect is because it fires some kind of a 16-bit VM in which to run it.
– TripeHound
8 hours ago
@StephenKitt Looks like it is using NTVDM -- just that my machine is quite long in the tooth!
– TripeHound
8 hours ago
Just checked on Windows 10 Home 32-bit and it was using NTVDM to run MS-DOS programs.
– Ross Ridge
8 hours ago
|
show 2 more comments
2
Does it in fact run?
– Anixx
10 hours ago
1
I can confirm that it will not run on 64 bit windows 7, but the answer notes 32 bit, and this confirms the exclusion.
– fred_dot_u
9 hours ago
Just confirmed it works on 32-bit Windows 7. Takes a little while to start (similar to runningdebug), which I believe/suspect is because it fires some kind of a 16-bit VM in which to run it.
– TripeHound
8 hours ago
@StephenKitt Looks like it is using NTVDM -- just that my machine is quite long in the tooth!
– TripeHound
8 hours ago
Just checked on Windows 10 Home 32-bit and it was using NTVDM to run MS-DOS programs.
– Ross Ridge
8 hours ago
2
2
Does it in fact run?
– Anixx
10 hours ago
Does it in fact run?
– Anixx
10 hours ago
1
1
I can confirm that it will not run on 64 bit windows 7, but the answer notes 32 bit, and this confirms the exclusion.
– fred_dot_u
9 hours ago
I can confirm that it will not run on 64 bit windows 7, but the answer notes 32 bit, and this confirms the exclusion.
– fred_dot_u
9 hours ago
Just confirmed it works on 32-bit Windows 7. Takes a little while to start (similar to running
debug), which I believe/suspect is because it fires some kind of a 16-bit VM in which to run it.– TripeHound
8 hours ago
Just confirmed it works on 32-bit Windows 7. Takes a little while to start (similar to running
debug), which I believe/suspect is because it fires some kind of a 16-bit VM in which to run it.– TripeHound
8 hours ago
@StephenKitt Looks like it is using NTVDM -- just that my machine is quite long in the tooth!
– TripeHound
8 hours ago
@StephenKitt Looks like it is using NTVDM -- just that my machine is quite long in the tooth!
– TripeHound
8 hours ago
Just checked on Windows 10 Home 32-bit and it was using NTVDM to run MS-DOS programs.
– Ross Ridge
8 hours ago
Just checked on Windows 10 Home 32-bit and it was using NTVDM to run MS-DOS programs.
– Ross Ridge
8 hours ago
|
show 2 more comments
Thanks for contributing an answer to Retrocomputing Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fretrocomputing.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f11385%2fwhat-is-the-oldest-commercial-ms-dos-program-that-can-run-on-modern-versions-of%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
2
It's not the oldest, but I still have clients of mine running the MS-DOS version of my accounting software on 32-bit versions of Windows. I even offered to give them my Windows version for free, but as long as they keep paying me support money, I keep the software current (within reason). Specifically, payroll changes for tax revisions. The code itself was ported from Radio Shack Model I in the late 70's, I took over maintenance around 1985, currently MS-BASIC 7.1
– Bill Hileman
6 hours ago
2
@BillHileman wow, I would think cumulative tax code changes would eat you to death, I.E. the ever increasing complexity would exceed the limits of the legacy platform.
– Harper
2 hours ago
2
@Harper I made the system flexible enough that it's been able to keep up with the changes so far. The last major change I had to made was regarding FICA where a new ceiling was added where a different rate kicked-in, but it's been able to survive with just tax table data entry over all this time otherwise, and yes, payroll taxes are incredibly complex programming-wise.
– Bill Hileman
2 hours ago
I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because open-ended "find it for me"-style questions do not work well in the Stack Exchange model. There is no way of confirming the one, true answer, and questions like this inevitably attract a large number of potentially correct answers without specific references or facts to back them up. It is not a practical problem faced in the hobby of retrocomputing or when using vintage computer hardware or software.
– Cody Gray
17 mins ago