Can the Cauchy product of divergent series with itself be convergent?Convergent Cauchy product of divergent...

Are the related objects in an SOQL query shared?

Is a switch from R to Python worth it?

What is the reason behind water not falling from a bucket at the top of loop?

“The Fourier transform cannot measure two phases at the same frequency.” Why not?

Does the length of a password for Wi-Fi affect speed?

What's "halachic" about "Esav hates Ya'akov"?

Is there a way to improve my grade after graduation?

I was contacted by a private bank overseas to get my inheritance

Need reasons why a satellite network would not work

What is it exactly about flying a Flyboard across the English channel that made Zapata's thighs burn?

How does Rust's 128-bit integer `i128` work on a 64-bit system?

Probably terminated or laid off soon; confront or not?

Are valid inequalities worth the effort given modern solver preprocessing options?

A Checkmate of Dubious Legality

Movie with a girl/fairy who was talking to a unicorn in a snow covered forest

Ancients don't give a full level?

Getting Lost in the Caves of Chaos

Why do proponents of guns oppose gun competency tests?

Can I use my US callsign to transmit while in El Salvador?

Custom Metadata SOQL WHERE clause not working

Why do my fried eggs start browning very fast?

Variable doesn't parse as string

What percentage of campground outlets are GFCI or RCD protected?

Can the Cauchy product of divergent series with itself be convergent?



Can the Cauchy product of divergent series with itself be convergent?


Convergent Cauchy product of divergent seriesConvergent series whose Cauchy product divergesProof of Double Sum Manipulation in a Proof using Cauchy Product for Seriescauchy product of two series divergesWhat's special about the Cauchy product?Two convergent series, Cauchy ProductProduct of absolutely convergent series is absolutely convergentShowing that $sin(2x)=2sin xcos x$ by multiplying power seriesCauchy product of series, all three series convergentConvergent Cauchy product of divergent seriesCounterexample to Cauchy product theorem






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}







11












$begingroup$


For series $sum a_n$ and $sum b_n$ their Cauchy product is the series $sum c_n$ where $c_n = a_0b_n+a_1b_{n-1}+...+a_nb_0$.



Does there exist a sequence $sum a_n$ such that:





  1. $sum a_n$ is divergent

  2. The Cauchy product of $ sum a_n$ and $sum a_n$ is convergent










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$














  • $begingroup$
    Possibly related: have a look at this question
    $endgroup$
    – MPW
    15 hours ago












  • $begingroup$
    @MPW Thank you but my question concerns the product of a sequence with itself, not the product of two different sequences.
    $endgroup$
    – John
    15 hours ago


















11












$begingroup$


For series $sum a_n$ and $sum b_n$ their Cauchy product is the series $sum c_n$ where $c_n = a_0b_n+a_1b_{n-1}+...+a_nb_0$.



Does there exist a sequence $sum a_n$ such that:





  1. $sum a_n$ is divergent

  2. The Cauchy product of $ sum a_n$ and $sum a_n$ is convergent










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$














  • $begingroup$
    Possibly related: have a look at this question
    $endgroup$
    – MPW
    15 hours ago












  • $begingroup$
    @MPW Thank you but my question concerns the product of a sequence with itself, not the product of two different sequences.
    $endgroup$
    – John
    15 hours ago














11












11








11


2



$begingroup$


For series $sum a_n$ and $sum b_n$ their Cauchy product is the series $sum c_n$ where $c_n = a_0b_n+a_1b_{n-1}+...+a_nb_0$.



Does there exist a sequence $sum a_n$ such that:





  1. $sum a_n$ is divergent

  2. The Cauchy product of $ sum a_n$ and $sum a_n$ is convergent










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




For series $sum a_n$ and $sum b_n$ their Cauchy product is the series $sum c_n$ where $c_n = a_0b_n+a_1b_{n-1}+...+a_nb_0$.



Does there exist a sequence $sum a_n$ such that:





  1. $sum a_n$ is divergent

  2. The Cauchy product of $ sum a_n$ and $sum a_n$ is convergent







real-analysis sequences-and-series divergent-series






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked 15 hours ago









JohnJohn

855 bronze badges




855 bronze badges















  • $begingroup$
    Possibly related: have a look at this question
    $endgroup$
    – MPW
    15 hours ago












  • $begingroup$
    @MPW Thank you but my question concerns the product of a sequence with itself, not the product of two different sequences.
    $endgroup$
    – John
    15 hours ago


















  • $begingroup$
    Possibly related: have a look at this question
    $endgroup$
    – MPW
    15 hours ago












  • $begingroup$
    @MPW Thank you but my question concerns the product of a sequence with itself, not the product of two different sequences.
    $endgroup$
    – John
    15 hours ago
















$begingroup$
Possibly related: have a look at this question
$endgroup$
– MPW
15 hours ago






$begingroup$
Possibly related: have a look at this question
$endgroup$
– MPW
15 hours ago














$begingroup$
@MPW Thank you but my question concerns the product of a sequence with itself, not the product of two different sequences.
$endgroup$
– John
15 hours ago




$begingroup$
@MPW Thank you but my question concerns the product of a sequence with itself, not the product of two different sequences.
$endgroup$
– John
15 hours ago










4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes


















7












$begingroup$

Let $c_0=1$, $c_1=-2$, $c_n=0$ for $n>1$.
Let $a_0=1$, and for $nge1$ recursively
$$a_n=frac12left(c_n-sum_{k=1}^ {n-1}a_ka_{n-k} right).$$
Then clearly $sum c_n=sum a_ncdot sum a_n$ in the sense of Cauchy product, and $sum c_n$ is of course very convergent.
Assume $sum a_n$ converges. Then $sum a_n x^n$ converges absolutely on $(-1,1)$. By absolute convergence, $sum c_n x^n=(sum a_n x^n)^2$ for $|x|<1$, which is absurd as $sum c_n x^n<0$ for $x>frac12$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$















  • $begingroup$
    Really cool proof, I love how after you define $a_i$ you get the contradiction without analyzing each coefficient. I am accepting this answer because it was the first one posted.
    $endgroup$
    – John
    12 hours ago



















3












$begingroup$

Without lost of generality, assume $a_0 neq 0$. One proves that the Cauchy relations $c_n = sum_{j=0}^n a_j a_{n-j}$ are equivalent to
$$ a_n = frac{1}{2a_0}left(c_n - sum_{j=1}^{n-1} a_j a_{n-j} right) , .$$
Multiplying $sum_n a_n$ by an overall constant if necessary, we can assume that $2a_0 = 1$. It follows that $c_0 = 1/4$ and that $c_1 = a_1$.



Let's consider the case when $c_n = 0$ for $n ge 2$, so that $sum_n c_n = 1/4 + c_1$ is convergent. It is easily proved by induction on $n ge 1$ that there exist positive integers $A_n$ such that $a_n = (-1)^{n-1}A_n c_1^n$. Therefore, whenever $|c_1| ge 1$, the limit $lim_{nto infty} a_n$ is not $0$ (if it exists at all), and so the series $sum_n a_n$ diverges.



Remark: In fact, based on John's answer, $A_{n+1} = C_n = frac{1}{n+1} {2n choose n}$ is the $n$-th Catalan number; Stirling's approximation allows to estimate $A_{n+1} sim frac{4^n}{sqrt{pi} n^{1/2}(n+1)}$, so that the above construction works if (and only if) $|c_1| > 1/4$.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$















  • $begingroup$
    Nice, I have the same proof but I found that $A_n = C_{n-1}$.
    $endgroup$
    – John
    12 hours ago



















1












$begingroup$

I managed to find a construction.



Put $a_0 = frac{1}{2}$, $a_n = (-1)^{n-1}C_{n-1}x^n$ for $n=1,2,3,...$ where $C_n$ is the n-th Catalan number.



So that $sum a_n = frac{1}{2} + x -x^2+2x^3-5x^4+14x^5-42x^6+...$



For $n geq 2 $ we have:



$c_n = [(-1)^{n-1}C_{n-1} - (-1)^{n-2}(C_0C_{n-2} + C_1C_{n-3}+...+C_{n-2}C_0)]cdot x^n$



Using the known formula: $C_n = C_0C_{n-1}+C_1C_{n-2}+...+C_{n-1}C_0$



We have $c_n$ =0



So $sum c_n = frac{1}{4} + x + 0 +0 + ...$ which obviously converges. Now putting $x=1$ we found the required series. ($sum a_n$ diverges because $C_n$ doesn't tend to 0 as $n to infty$)






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$























    0












    $begingroup$

    Let $f(x)=sum_{n=0}^infty a_nx^n$ be the (binomial) Taylor series for the function $sqrt{1+x}$. Then:



    1) This power series has radius of convergence $1$, so the series $f(2)=sum_{n=0}^infty a_n2^n$ diverges.



    2) On the interval $(-1,1)$, we have $f(x)f(x)=1+x$ pointwise, and so the Cauchy product of $f(x)$ with itself must be the formal power series $1+x+0x^2+0x^3+dots$. In particular, this means that the Cauchy product of $f(2)$ with itself is the series $1+2+0+0+dots$.



    (This is essentially the same example as in all the other answers, but I feel like this is an easier way to come to it. We could replace $1+x$ with any other holomorphic function whose square root is not holomorphic on its entire domain.)






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$


















      Your Answer








      StackExchange.ready(function() {
      var channelOptions = {
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "69"
      };
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
      createEditor();
      });
      }
      else {
      createEditor();
      }
      });

      function createEditor() {
      StackExchange.prepareEditor({
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: true,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: 10,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader: {
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      },
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      });


      }
      });














      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function () {
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3314213%2fcan-the-cauchy-product-of-divergent-series-with-itself-be-convergent%23new-answer', 'question_page');
      }
      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      4 Answers
      4






      active

      oldest

      votes








      4 Answers
      4






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      7












      $begingroup$

      Let $c_0=1$, $c_1=-2$, $c_n=0$ for $n>1$.
      Let $a_0=1$, and for $nge1$ recursively
      $$a_n=frac12left(c_n-sum_{k=1}^ {n-1}a_ka_{n-k} right).$$
      Then clearly $sum c_n=sum a_ncdot sum a_n$ in the sense of Cauchy product, and $sum c_n$ is of course very convergent.
      Assume $sum a_n$ converges. Then $sum a_n x^n$ converges absolutely on $(-1,1)$. By absolute convergence, $sum c_n x^n=(sum a_n x^n)^2$ for $|x|<1$, which is absurd as $sum c_n x^n<0$ for $x>frac12$.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$















      • $begingroup$
        Really cool proof, I love how after you define $a_i$ you get the contradiction without analyzing each coefficient. I am accepting this answer because it was the first one posted.
        $endgroup$
        – John
        12 hours ago
















      7












      $begingroup$

      Let $c_0=1$, $c_1=-2$, $c_n=0$ for $n>1$.
      Let $a_0=1$, and for $nge1$ recursively
      $$a_n=frac12left(c_n-sum_{k=1}^ {n-1}a_ka_{n-k} right).$$
      Then clearly $sum c_n=sum a_ncdot sum a_n$ in the sense of Cauchy product, and $sum c_n$ is of course very convergent.
      Assume $sum a_n$ converges. Then $sum a_n x^n$ converges absolutely on $(-1,1)$. By absolute convergence, $sum c_n x^n=(sum a_n x^n)^2$ for $|x|<1$, which is absurd as $sum c_n x^n<0$ for $x>frac12$.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$















      • $begingroup$
        Really cool proof, I love how after you define $a_i$ you get the contradiction without analyzing each coefficient. I am accepting this answer because it was the first one posted.
        $endgroup$
        – John
        12 hours ago














      7












      7








      7





      $begingroup$

      Let $c_0=1$, $c_1=-2$, $c_n=0$ for $n>1$.
      Let $a_0=1$, and for $nge1$ recursively
      $$a_n=frac12left(c_n-sum_{k=1}^ {n-1}a_ka_{n-k} right).$$
      Then clearly $sum c_n=sum a_ncdot sum a_n$ in the sense of Cauchy product, and $sum c_n$ is of course very convergent.
      Assume $sum a_n$ converges. Then $sum a_n x^n$ converges absolutely on $(-1,1)$. By absolute convergence, $sum c_n x^n=(sum a_n x^n)^2$ for $|x|<1$, which is absurd as $sum c_n x^n<0$ for $x>frac12$.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$



      Let $c_0=1$, $c_1=-2$, $c_n=0$ for $n>1$.
      Let $a_0=1$, and for $nge1$ recursively
      $$a_n=frac12left(c_n-sum_{k=1}^ {n-1}a_ka_{n-k} right).$$
      Then clearly $sum c_n=sum a_ncdot sum a_n$ in the sense of Cauchy product, and $sum c_n$ is of course very convergent.
      Assume $sum a_n$ converges. Then $sum a_n x^n$ converges absolutely on $(-1,1)$. By absolute convergence, $sum c_n x^n=(sum a_n x^n)^2$ for $|x|<1$, which is absurd as $sum c_n x^n<0$ for $x>frac12$.







      share|cite|improve this answer












      share|cite|improve this answer



      share|cite|improve this answer










      answered 13 hours ago









      Hagen von EitzenHagen von Eitzen

      295k24 gold badges283 silver badges518 bronze badges




      295k24 gold badges283 silver badges518 bronze badges















      • $begingroup$
        Really cool proof, I love how after you define $a_i$ you get the contradiction without analyzing each coefficient. I am accepting this answer because it was the first one posted.
        $endgroup$
        – John
        12 hours ago


















      • $begingroup$
        Really cool proof, I love how after you define $a_i$ you get the contradiction without analyzing each coefficient. I am accepting this answer because it was the first one posted.
        $endgroup$
        – John
        12 hours ago
















      $begingroup$
      Really cool proof, I love how after you define $a_i$ you get the contradiction without analyzing each coefficient. I am accepting this answer because it was the first one posted.
      $endgroup$
      – John
      12 hours ago




      $begingroup$
      Really cool proof, I love how after you define $a_i$ you get the contradiction without analyzing each coefficient. I am accepting this answer because it was the first one posted.
      $endgroup$
      – John
      12 hours ago













      3












      $begingroup$

      Without lost of generality, assume $a_0 neq 0$. One proves that the Cauchy relations $c_n = sum_{j=0}^n a_j a_{n-j}$ are equivalent to
      $$ a_n = frac{1}{2a_0}left(c_n - sum_{j=1}^{n-1} a_j a_{n-j} right) , .$$
      Multiplying $sum_n a_n$ by an overall constant if necessary, we can assume that $2a_0 = 1$. It follows that $c_0 = 1/4$ and that $c_1 = a_1$.



      Let's consider the case when $c_n = 0$ for $n ge 2$, so that $sum_n c_n = 1/4 + c_1$ is convergent. It is easily proved by induction on $n ge 1$ that there exist positive integers $A_n$ such that $a_n = (-1)^{n-1}A_n c_1^n$. Therefore, whenever $|c_1| ge 1$, the limit $lim_{nto infty} a_n$ is not $0$ (if it exists at all), and so the series $sum_n a_n$ diverges.



      Remark: In fact, based on John's answer, $A_{n+1} = C_n = frac{1}{n+1} {2n choose n}$ is the $n$-th Catalan number; Stirling's approximation allows to estimate $A_{n+1} sim frac{4^n}{sqrt{pi} n^{1/2}(n+1)}$, so that the above construction works if (and only if) $|c_1| > 1/4$.






      share|cite|improve this answer











      $endgroup$















      • $begingroup$
        Nice, I have the same proof but I found that $A_n = C_{n-1}$.
        $endgroup$
        – John
        12 hours ago
















      3












      $begingroup$

      Without lost of generality, assume $a_0 neq 0$. One proves that the Cauchy relations $c_n = sum_{j=0}^n a_j a_{n-j}$ are equivalent to
      $$ a_n = frac{1}{2a_0}left(c_n - sum_{j=1}^{n-1} a_j a_{n-j} right) , .$$
      Multiplying $sum_n a_n$ by an overall constant if necessary, we can assume that $2a_0 = 1$. It follows that $c_0 = 1/4$ and that $c_1 = a_1$.



      Let's consider the case when $c_n = 0$ for $n ge 2$, so that $sum_n c_n = 1/4 + c_1$ is convergent. It is easily proved by induction on $n ge 1$ that there exist positive integers $A_n$ such that $a_n = (-1)^{n-1}A_n c_1^n$. Therefore, whenever $|c_1| ge 1$, the limit $lim_{nto infty} a_n$ is not $0$ (if it exists at all), and so the series $sum_n a_n$ diverges.



      Remark: In fact, based on John's answer, $A_{n+1} = C_n = frac{1}{n+1} {2n choose n}$ is the $n$-th Catalan number; Stirling's approximation allows to estimate $A_{n+1} sim frac{4^n}{sqrt{pi} n^{1/2}(n+1)}$, so that the above construction works if (and only if) $|c_1| > 1/4$.






      share|cite|improve this answer











      $endgroup$















      • $begingroup$
        Nice, I have the same proof but I found that $A_n = C_{n-1}$.
        $endgroup$
        – John
        12 hours ago














      3












      3








      3





      $begingroup$

      Without lost of generality, assume $a_0 neq 0$. One proves that the Cauchy relations $c_n = sum_{j=0}^n a_j a_{n-j}$ are equivalent to
      $$ a_n = frac{1}{2a_0}left(c_n - sum_{j=1}^{n-1} a_j a_{n-j} right) , .$$
      Multiplying $sum_n a_n$ by an overall constant if necessary, we can assume that $2a_0 = 1$. It follows that $c_0 = 1/4$ and that $c_1 = a_1$.



      Let's consider the case when $c_n = 0$ for $n ge 2$, so that $sum_n c_n = 1/4 + c_1$ is convergent. It is easily proved by induction on $n ge 1$ that there exist positive integers $A_n$ such that $a_n = (-1)^{n-1}A_n c_1^n$. Therefore, whenever $|c_1| ge 1$, the limit $lim_{nto infty} a_n$ is not $0$ (if it exists at all), and so the series $sum_n a_n$ diverges.



      Remark: In fact, based on John's answer, $A_{n+1} = C_n = frac{1}{n+1} {2n choose n}$ is the $n$-th Catalan number; Stirling's approximation allows to estimate $A_{n+1} sim frac{4^n}{sqrt{pi} n^{1/2}(n+1)}$, so that the above construction works if (and only if) $|c_1| > 1/4$.






      share|cite|improve this answer











      $endgroup$



      Without lost of generality, assume $a_0 neq 0$. One proves that the Cauchy relations $c_n = sum_{j=0}^n a_j a_{n-j}$ are equivalent to
      $$ a_n = frac{1}{2a_0}left(c_n - sum_{j=1}^{n-1} a_j a_{n-j} right) , .$$
      Multiplying $sum_n a_n$ by an overall constant if necessary, we can assume that $2a_0 = 1$. It follows that $c_0 = 1/4$ and that $c_1 = a_1$.



      Let's consider the case when $c_n = 0$ for $n ge 2$, so that $sum_n c_n = 1/4 + c_1$ is convergent. It is easily proved by induction on $n ge 1$ that there exist positive integers $A_n$ such that $a_n = (-1)^{n-1}A_n c_1^n$. Therefore, whenever $|c_1| ge 1$, the limit $lim_{nto infty} a_n$ is not $0$ (if it exists at all), and so the series $sum_n a_n$ diverges.



      Remark: In fact, based on John's answer, $A_{n+1} = C_n = frac{1}{n+1} {2n choose n}$ is the $n$-th Catalan number; Stirling's approximation allows to estimate $A_{n+1} sim frac{4^n}{sqrt{pi} n^{1/2}(n+1)}$, so that the above construction works if (and only if) $|c_1| > 1/4$.







      share|cite|improve this answer














      share|cite|improve this answer



      share|cite|improve this answer








      edited 12 hours ago

























      answered 13 hours ago









      Jordan PayetteJordan Payette

      3,1761 gold badge5 silver badges10 bronze badges




      3,1761 gold badge5 silver badges10 bronze badges















      • $begingroup$
        Nice, I have the same proof but I found that $A_n = C_{n-1}$.
        $endgroup$
        – John
        12 hours ago


















      • $begingroup$
        Nice, I have the same proof but I found that $A_n = C_{n-1}$.
        $endgroup$
        – John
        12 hours ago
















      $begingroup$
      Nice, I have the same proof but I found that $A_n = C_{n-1}$.
      $endgroup$
      – John
      12 hours ago




      $begingroup$
      Nice, I have the same proof but I found that $A_n = C_{n-1}$.
      $endgroup$
      – John
      12 hours ago











      1












      $begingroup$

      I managed to find a construction.



      Put $a_0 = frac{1}{2}$, $a_n = (-1)^{n-1}C_{n-1}x^n$ for $n=1,2,3,...$ where $C_n$ is the n-th Catalan number.



      So that $sum a_n = frac{1}{2} + x -x^2+2x^3-5x^4+14x^5-42x^6+...$



      For $n geq 2 $ we have:



      $c_n = [(-1)^{n-1}C_{n-1} - (-1)^{n-2}(C_0C_{n-2} + C_1C_{n-3}+...+C_{n-2}C_0)]cdot x^n$



      Using the known formula: $C_n = C_0C_{n-1}+C_1C_{n-2}+...+C_{n-1}C_0$



      We have $c_n$ =0



      So $sum c_n = frac{1}{4} + x + 0 +0 + ...$ which obviously converges. Now putting $x=1$ we found the required series. ($sum a_n$ diverges because $C_n$ doesn't tend to 0 as $n to infty$)






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$




















        1












        $begingroup$

        I managed to find a construction.



        Put $a_0 = frac{1}{2}$, $a_n = (-1)^{n-1}C_{n-1}x^n$ for $n=1,2,3,...$ where $C_n$ is the n-th Catalan number.



        So that $sum a_n = frac{1}{2} + x -x^2+2x^3-5x^4+14x^5-42x^6+...$



        For $n geq 2 $ we have:



        $c_n = [(-1)^{n-1}C_{n-1} - (-1)^{n-2}(C_0C_{n-2} + C_1C_{n-3}+...+C_{n-2}C_0)]cdot x^n$



        Using the known formula: $C_n = C_0C_{n-1}+C_1C_{n-2}+...+C_{n-1}C_0$



        We have $c_n$ =0



        So $sum c_n = frac{1}{4} + x + 0 +0 + ...$ which obviously converges. Now putting $x=1$ we found the required series. ($sum a_n$ diverges because $C_n$ doesn't tend to 0 as $n to infty$)






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$


















          1












          1








          1





          $begingroup$

          I managed to find a construction.



          Put $a_0 = frac{1}{2}$, $a_n = (-1)^{n-1}C_{n-1}x^n$ for $n=1,2,3,...$ where $C_n$ is the n-th Catalan number.



          So that $sum a_n = frac{1}{2} + x -x^2+2x^3-5x^4+14x^5-42x^6+...$



          For $n geq 2 $ we have:



          $c_n = [(-1)^{n-1}C_{n-1} - (-1)^{n-2}(C_0C_{n-2} + C_1C_{n-3}+...+C_{n-2}C_0)]cdot x^n$



          Using the known formula: $C_n = C_0C_{n-1}+C_1C_{n-2}+...+C_{n-1}C_0$



          We have $c_n$ =0



          So $sum c_n = frac{1}{4} + x + 0 +0 + ...$ which obviously converges. Now putting $x=1$ we found the required series. ($sum a_n$ diverges because $C_n$ doesn't tend to 0 as $n to infty$)






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          I managed to find a construction.



          Put $a_0 = frac{1}{2}$, $a_n = (-1)^{n-1}C_{n-1}x^n$ for $n=1,2,3,...$ where $C_n$ is the n-th Catalan number.



          So that $sum a_n = frac{1}{2} + x -x^2+2x^3-5x^4+14x^5-42x^6+...$



          For $n geq 2 $ we have:



          $c_n = [(-1)^{n-1}C_{n-1} - (-1)^{n-2}(C_0C_{n-2} + C_1C_{n-3}+...+C_{n-2}C_0)]cdot x^n$



          Using the known formula: $C_n = C_0C_{n-1}+C_1C_{n-2}+...+C_{n-1}C_0$



          We have $c_n$ =0



          So $sum c_n = frac{1}{4} + x + 0 +0 + ...$ which obviously converges. Now putting $x=1$ we found the required series. ($sum a_n$ diverges because $C_n$ doesn't tend to 0 as $n to infty$)







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered 13 hours ago









          JohnJohn

          855 bronze badges




          855 bronze badges


























              0












              $begingroup$

              Let $f(x)=sum_{n=0}^infty a_nx^n$ be the (binomial) Taylor series for the function $sqrt{1+x}$. Then:



              1) This power series has radius of convergence $1$, so the series $f(2)=sum_{n=0}^infty a_n2^n$ diverges.



              2) On the interval $(-1,1)$, we have $f(x)f(x)=1+x$ pointwise, and so the Cauchy product of $f(x)$ with itself must be the formal power series $1+x+0x^2+0x^3+dots$. In particular, this means that the Cauchy product of $f(2)$ with itself is the series $1+2+0+0+dots$.



              (This is essentially the same example as in all the other answers, but I feel like this is an easier way to come to it. We could replace $1+x$ with any other holomorphic function whose square root is not holomorphic on its entire domain.)






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$




















                0












                $begingroup$

                Let $f(x)=sum_{n=0}^infty a_nx^n$ be the (binomial) Taylor series for the function $sqrt{1+x}$. Then:



                1) This power series has radius of convergence $1$, so the series $f(2)=sum_{n=0}^infty a_n2^n$ diverges.



                2) On the interval $(-1,1)$, we have $f(x)f(x)=1+x$ pointwise, and so the Cauchy product of $f(x)$ with itself must be the formal power series $1+x+0x^2+0x^3+dots$. In particular, this means that the Cauchy product of $f(2)$ with itself is the series $1+2+0+0+dots$.



                (This is essentially the same example as in all the other answers, but I feel like this is an easier way to come to it. We could replace $1+x$ with any other holomorphic function whose square root is not holomorphic on its entire domain.)






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$


















                  0












                  0








                  0





                  $begingroup$

                  Let $f(x)=sum_{n=0}^infty a_nx^n$ be the (binomial) Taylor series for the function $sqrt{1+x}$. Then:



                  1) This power series has radius of convergence $1$, so the series $f(2)=sum_{n=0}^infty a_n2^n$ diverges.



                  2) On the interval $(-1,1)$, we have $f(x)f(x)=1+x$ pointwise, and so the Cauchy product of $f(x)$ with itself must be the formal power series $1+x+0x^2+0x^3+dots$. In particular, this means that the Cauchy product of $f(2)$ with itself is the series $1+2+0+0+dots$.



                  (This is essentially the same example as in all the other answers, but I feel like this is an easier way to come to it. We could replace $1+x$ with any other holomorphic function whose square root is not holomorphic on its entire domain.)






                  share|cite|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$



                  Let $f(x)=sum_{n=0}^infty a_nx^n$ be the (binomial) Taylor series for the function $sqrt{1+x}$. Then:



                  1) This power series has radius of convergence $1$, so the series $f(2)=sum_{n=0}^infty a_n2^n$ diverges.



                  2) On the interval $(-1,1)$, we have $f(x)f(x)=1+x$ pointwise, and so the Cauchy product of $f(x)$ with itself must be the formal power series $1+x+0x^2+0x^3+dots$. In particular, this means that the Cauchy product of $f(2)$ with itself is the series $1+2+0+0+dots$.



                  (This is essentially the same example as in all the other answers, but I feel like this is an easier way to come to it. We could replace $1+x$ with any other holomorphic function whose square root is not holomorphic on its entire domain.)







                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  answered 12 hours ago









                  MicahMicah

                  31.1k13 gold badges66 silver badges108 bronze badges




                  31.1k13 gold badges66 silver badges108 bronze badges

































                      draft saved

                      draft discarded




















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function () {
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3314213%2fcan-the-cauchy-product-of-divergent-series-with-itself-be-convergent%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                      }
                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Taj Mahal Inhaltsverzeichnis Aufbau | Geschichte | 350-Jahr-Feier | Heutige Bedeutung | Siehe auch |...

                      Baia Sprie Cuprins Etimologie | Istorie | Demografie | Politică și administrație | Arii naturale...

                      Nicolae Petrescu-Găină Cuprins Biografie | Opera | In memoriam | Varia | Controverse, incertitudini...