Why did the US Airways Flight 1549 passengers stay on the wings?What are these hooks on the A320's wing used...
…down the primrose path
How do I know when and if a character requires a backstory?
How to win against ants
How is foot-pounds of energy defined?
How do I show and not tell a backstory?
Write The Shortest Program to Calculate Height of a Binary Tree
Pronouns when writing from the point of view of a robot
Would this winged human/angel be able to fly?
Is it okay to use different fingers every time while playing a song on keyboard? Is it considered a bad practice?
Why wasn't interlaced CRT scanning done back and forth?
The Game of the Century - why didn't Byrne take the rook after he forked Fischer?
Ancients don't give a full level?
How does one receive forgiveness from someone they have wronged after their death?
Formal mathematical definition of renormalization group flow
How does Rust's 128-bit integer `i128` work on a 64-bit system?
Are valid inequalities worth the effort given modern solver preprocessing options?
Custom Metadata SOQL WHERE clause not working
What is it exactly about flying a Flyboard across the English channel that made Zapata's thighs burn?
How can I perform a deterministic physics simulation?
Movie with a girl/fairy who was talking to a unicorn in a snow covered forest
Is the first page of a novel really that important?
What percentage of campground outlets are GFCI or RCD protected?
Does a humanoid possessed by a ghost register as undead to a paladin's Divine Sense?
What's "halachic" about "Esav hates Ya'akov"?
Why did the US Airways Flight 1549 passengers stay on the wings?
What are these hooks on the A320's wing used for?What and where are “flotation seat cushions”?How, exactly, did US1549 land on the Hudson?Which gas is used to fill the evacuation slides of modern aircraft?What risks come from passengers taking baggage during emergency evacuation?Aircraft Emergency Evacuation slide inflation system: Why is a mixture of CO2 & N2 used instead of pure N2?How is the emergency exit row handled when there are no passengers aboard eligible to sit in an exit row seat?Why evacuate wing at the front side after water landing?For routes over oceans, are slide rafts fitted with first-aid items, food, water, radio, etc?Is it a standard procedure to use emergency slides without imminent danger?How are disabled passengers evacuated during emergency?Where can I listen to the actual cockpit voice recorder audio from US Airways Flight 1549?
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}
$begingroup$
Couldn't they use the overwing slides as flotation devices and stay on those instead?
evacuation ditching us1549-accident
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Couldn't they use the overwing slides as flotation devices and stay on those instead?
evacuation ditching us1549-accident
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Couldn't they use the overwing slides as flotation devices and stay on those instead?
evacuation ditching us1549-accident
New contributor
$endgroup$
Couldn't they use the overwing slides as flotation devices and stay on those instead?
evacuation ditching us1549-accident
evacuation ditching us1549-accident
New contributor
New contributor
edited 13 hours ago
ymb1
77.2k9 gold badges249 silver badges416 bronze badges
77.2k9 gold badges249 silver badges416 bronze badges
New contributor
asked 14 hours ago
user1202136user1202136
1433 bronze badges
1433 bronze badges
New contributor
New contributor
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Because they were told to evacuate there, if you take a look at the official audio transcript from the accident:
place both arms through the straps and hug it to your chest. flight
attendants are pointing out there are a total of eight exits on this
aircraft, two door exits in front of the aircraft, four window exits
over the wings, and two door exits in the rear of the aircraft. once
again, two door exits at the front of the aircraft, four window exits
over the wings, and two door exits in the rear of the aircraft. each
door is equipped with an evacuation slide if directed to exit... the
aircraft jump onto the slide and move away from the aircraft.
The rear exits were largely blocked by water making the forward exits the only ones with slides, those slides were utilized as evidenced by photos included in the report:
(source)
With only half of the slides available the wings also had to be used. The wing slides are intended only for ground landings and do not double as rafts, as per the accident report
According to TSO C-69c, Type IV is a combination inflatable exit ramp
and wing-to-ground slide. The off-wing ramp/slides were intended to be
used in the event of a ground, not a water, evacuation.
As such the over wing slides could not be used in this case.
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
I wasn't aware that the overwing slides were not designed for water evacuation. Thanks!
$endgroup$
– user1202136
14 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Per the accident report from the NTSB, only the four exit slides (two at the forward doors and two at the aft doors) could be used as rafts, as the aircraft was configured for extended overwater operations (EOW). Regulations required there to be enough capacity for all passengers if the largest raft was not usable. Each slide/raft was rated for 44 passengers, or an overload of 55 passengers.
During the ditching, the aft part of the cabin rapidly filled with water, preventing the use of the aft two exits and their slides. This meant that the remaining rafts could hold a maximum of 110 people if overloaded out of the 155 people on board the flight. That would leave at least 45 people on the wings.
The report states that about 87 people were rescued outside the two rafts. Many passengers rushed to the overwing exits, creating a backup, and flight attendants had to ask passengers to come forward to the rafts. The overwing exits are not supposed to be used unless other exits aren't available. There are also life lines to help passengers when out on the wings, but these were not used. Since the flight attendants are located on either end of the plane they were too far away to advise the passengers about this.
and the flight attendants at either end of the plane were too far away to stop them. There were also
The report further discusses even the two rafts were not technically required (the flight was not an EOW route), and the remaining passengers were in danger of not surviving the cold water if they had not been rescued so quickly.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "528"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
user1202136 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faviation.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f67340%2fwhy-did-the-us-airways-flight-1549-passengers-stay-on-the-wings%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Because they were told to evacuate there, if you take a look at the official audio transcript from the accident:
place both arms through the straps and hug it to your chest. flight
attendants are pointing out there are a total of eight exits on this
aircraft, two door exits in front of the aircraft, four window exits
over the wings, and two door exits in the rear of the aircraft. once
again, two door exits at the front of the aircraft, four window exits
over the wings, and two door exits in the rear of the aircraft. each
door is equipped with an evacuation slide if directed to exit... the
aircraft jump onto the slide and move away from the aircraft.
The rear exits were largely blocked by water making the forward exits the only ones with slides, those slides were utilized as evidenced by photos included in the report:
(source)
With only half of the slides available the wings also had to be used. The wing slides are intended only for ground landings and do not double as rafts, as per the accident report
According to TSO C-69c, Type IV is a combination inflatable exit ramp
and wing-to-ground slide. The off-wing ramp/slides were intended to be
used in the event of a ground, not a water, evacuation.
As such the over wing slides could not be used in this case.
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
I wasn't aware that the overwing slides were not designed for water evacuation. Thanks!
$endgroup$
– user1202136
14 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Because they were told to evacuate there, if you take a look at the official audio transcript from the accident:
place both arms through the straps and hug it to your chest. flight
attendants are pointing out there are a total of eight exits on this
aircraft, two door exits in front of the aircraft, four window exits
over the wings, and two door exits in the rear of the aircraft. once
again, two door exits at the front of the aircraft, four window exits
over the wings, and two door exits in the rear of the aircraft. each
door is equipped with an evacuation slide if directed to exit... the
aircraft jump onto the slide and move away from the aircraft.
The rear exits were largely blocked by water making the forward exits the only ones with slides, those slides were utilized as evidenced by photos included in the report:
(source)
With only half of the slides available the wings also had to be used. The wing slides are intended only for ground landings and do not double as rafts, as per the accident report
According to TSO C-69c, Type IV is a combination inflatable exit ramp
and wing-to-ground slide. The off-wing ramp/slides were intended to be
used in the event of a ground, not a water, evacuation.
As such the over wing slides could not be used in this case.
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
I wasn't aware that the overwing slides were not designed for water evacuation. Thanks!
$endgroup$
– user1202136
14 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Because they were told to evacuate there, if you take a look at the official audio transcript from the accident:
place both arms through the straps and hug it to your chest. flight
attendants are pointing out there are a total of eight exits on this
aircraft, two door exits in front of the aircraft, four window exits
over the wings, and two door exits in the rear of the aircraft. once
again, two door exits at the front of the aircraft, four window exits
over the wings, and two door exits in the rear of the aircraft. each
door is equipped with an evacuation slide if directed to exit... the
aircraft jump onto the slide and move away from the aircraft.
The rear exits were largely blocked by water making the forward exits the only ones with slides, those slides were utilized as evidenced by photos included in the report:
(source)
With only half of the slides available the wings also had to be used. The wing slides are intended only for ground landings and do not double as rafts, as per the accident report
According to TSO C-69c, Type IV is a combination inflatable exit ramp
and wing-to-ground slide. The off-wing ramp/slides were intended to be
used in the event of a ground, not a water, evacuation.
As such the over wing slides could not be used in this case.
$endgroup$
Because they were told to evacuate there, if you take a look at the official audio transcript from the accident:
place both arms through the straps and hug it to your chest. flight
attendants are pointing out there are a total of eight exits on this
aircraft, two door exits in front of the aircraft, four window exits
over the wings, and two door exits in the rear of the aircraft. once
again, two door exits at the front of the aircraft, four window exits
over the wings, and two door exits in the rear of the aircraft. each
door is equipped with an evacuation slide if directed to exit... the
aircraft jump onto the slide and move away from the aircraft.
The rear exits were largely blocked by water making the forward exits the only ones with slides, those slides were utilized as evidenced by photos included in the report:
(source)
With only half of the slides available the wings also had to be used. The wing slides are intended only for ground landings and do not double as rafts, as per the accident report
According to TSO C-69c, Type IV is a combination inflatable exit ramp
and wing-to-ground slide. The off-wing ramp/slides were intended to be
used in the event of a ground, not a water, evacuation.
As such the over wing slides could not be used in this case.
edited 13 hours ago
fooot
56.9k18 gold badges181 silver badges344 bronze badges
56.9k18 gold badges181 silver badges344 bronze badges
answered 14 hours ago
DaveDave
74.7k4 gold badges148 silver badges268 bronze badges
74.7k4 gold badges148 silver badges268 bronze badges
2
$begingroup$
I wasn't aware that the overwing slides were not designed for water evacuation. Thanks!
$endgroup$
– user1202136
14 hours ago
add a comment |
2
$begingroup$
I wasn't aware that the overwing slides were not designed for water evacuation. Thanks!
$endgroup$
– user1202136
14 hours ago
2
2
$begingroup$
I wasn't aware that the overwing slides were not designed for water evacuation. Thanks!
$endgroup$
– user1202136
14 hours ago
$begingroup$
I wasn't aware that the overwing slides were not designed for water evacuation. Thanks!
$endgroup$
– user1202136
14 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Per the accident report from the NTSB, only the four exit slides (two at the forward doors and two at the aft doors) could be used as rafts, as the aircraft was configured for extended overwater operations (EOW). Regulations required there to be enough capacity for all passengers if the largest raft was not usable. Each slide/raft was rated for 44 passengers, or an overload of 55 passengers.
During the ditching, the aft part of the cabin rapidly filled with water, preventing the use of the aft two exits and their slides. This meant that the remaining rafts could hold a maximum of 110 people if overloaded out of the 155 people on board the flight. That would leave at least 45 people on the wings.
The report states that about 87 people were rescued outside the two rafts. Many passengers rushed to the overwing exits, creating a backup, and flight attendants had to ask passengers to come forward to the rafts. The overwing exits are not supposed to be used unless other exits aren't available. There are also life lines to help passengers when out on the wings, but these were not used. Since the flight attendants are located on either end of the plane they were too far away to advise the passengers about this.
and the flight attendants at either end of the plane were too far away to stop them. There were also
The report further discusses even the two rafts were not technically required (the flight was not an EOW route), and the remaining passengers were in danger of not surviving the cold water if they had not been rescued so quickly.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Per the accident report from the NTSB, only the four exit slides (two at the forward doors and two at the aft doors) could be used as rafts, as the aircraft was configured for extended overwater operations (EOW). Regulations required there to be enough capacity for all passengers if the largest raft was not usable. Each slide/raft was rated for 44 passengers, or an overload of 55 passengers.
During the ditching, the aft part of the cabin rapidly filled with water, preventing the use of the aft two exits and their slides. This meant that the remaining rafts could hold a maximum of 110 people if overloaded out of the 155 people on board the flight. That would leave at least 45 people on the wings.
The report states that about 87 people were rescued outside the two rafts. Many passengers rushed to the overwing exits, creating a backup, and flight attendants had to ask passengers to come forward to the rafts. The overwing exits are not supposed to be used unless other exits aren't available. There are also life lines to help passengers when out on the wings, but these were not used. Since the flight attendants are located on either end of the plane they were too far away to advise the passengers about this.
and the flight attendants at either end of the plane were too far away to stop them. There were also
The report further discusses even the two rafts were not technically required (the flight was not an EOW route), and the remaining passengers were in danger of not surviving the cold water if they had not been rescued so quickly.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Per the accident report from the NTSB, only the four exit slides (two at the forward doors and two at the aft doors) could be used as rafts, as the aircraft was configured for extended overwater operations (EOW). Regulations required there to be enough capacity for all passengers if the largest raft was not usable. Each slide/raft was rated for 44 passengers, or an overload of 55 passengers.
During the ditching, the aft part of the cabin rapidly filled with water, preventing the use of the aft two exits and their slides. This meant that the remaining rafts could hold a maximum of 110 people if overloaded out of the 155 people on board the flight. That would leave at least 45 people on the wings.
The report states that about 87 people were rescued outside the two rafts. Many passengers rushed to the overwing exits, creating a backup, and flight attendants had to ask passengers to come forward to the rafts. The overwing exits are not supposed to be used unless other exits aren't available. There are also life lines to help passengers when out on the wings, but these were not used. Since the flight attendants are located on either end of the plane they were too far away to advise the passengers about this.
and the flight attendants at either end of the plane were too far away to stop them. There were also
The report further discusses even the two rafts were not technically required (the flight was not an EOW route), and the remaining passengers were in danger of not surviving the cold water if they had not been rescued so quickly.
$endgroup$
Per the accident report from the NTSB, only the four exit slides (two at the forward doors and two at the aft doors) could be used as rafts, as the aircraft was configured for extended overwater operations (EOW). Regulations required there to be enough capacity for all passengers if the largest raft was not usable. Each slide/raft was rated for 44 passengers, or an overload of 55 passengers.
During the ditching, the aft part of the cabin rapidly filled with water, preventing the use of the aft two exits and their slides. This meant that the remaining rafts could hold a maximum of 110 people if overloaded out of the 155 people on board the flight. That would leave at least 45 people on the wings.
The report states that about 87 people were rescued outside the two rafts. Many passengers rushed to the overwing exits, creating a backup, and flight attendants had to ask passengers to come forward to the rafts. The overwing exits are not supposed to be used unless other exits aren't available. There are also life lines to help passengers when out on the wings, but these were not used. Since the flight attendants are located on either end of the plane they were too far away to advise the passengers about this.
and the flight attendants at either end of the plane were too far away to stop them. There were also
The report further discusses even the two rafts were not technically required (the flight was not an EOW route), and the remaining passengers were in danger of not surviving the cold water if they had not been rescued so quickly.
edited 7 hours ago
answered 13 hours ago
foootfooot
56.9k18 gold badges181 silver badges344 bronze badges
56.9k18 gold badges181 silver badges344 bronze badges
add a comment |
add a comment |
user1202136 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
user1202136 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
user1202136 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
user1202136 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Aviation Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faviation.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f67340%2fwhy-did-the-us-airways-flight-1549-passengers-stay-on-the-wings%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown