Mdthbs

The answer to this question depends heavily on your ability to accurately predict a recession.

Hypothetically speaking, if you were 100% accurate with your prediction, the obvious choice would be to sell your stocks. You would avoid all of the downside, which would allow you to invest your money elsewhere and/or maximize your reentry when the market turns bullish again.

In reality, you can't make any stock market predication with 100% accuracy, so you need to decide whether or not timing the market is something you want to attempt. You'll want to consider your risk exposure, investment timeframe, and alternative investments.

Take the 2008 recession as an example. The market dropped nearly 60% from October 2007 highs down to February 2009 lows. As of today, the market is roughly 80% higher than the October highs and over 300% higher than the February 2009 lows. This provides a couple key insights:

1. If you could've predicted the recession, you would have protected yourself from 60% downside.


2. If you predicted the recession and the reversal off lows, your returns would be over 200% higher than if you had simply held through the recession.


3. Long-term, both strategies (holding and selling) yielded profits.

The last consideration is what happens if your prediction is completely inaccurate. If you sell prematurely, you are limiting your upside. People have been talking about bear markets non-stop since 2010 and they've all been wrong so far. These predictions, if acted on, would've severely limited investor returns over the past decade.

Of course, if you expect a recession, you can hedge risk without being "all out." For example:

1. Sell a portion of your stocks or a piece of your positions in certain stocks (i.e. 500 shares of a 1000 share position)


2. Set tighter stops (or trailing stops) to limit your downside.

If I anticipate a recession should I sell the stock I have,

That's market timing.

and then wait for everything to bottom out and then resume dollar-cost-averaging? Or should I just proceed as normal?

If you're investing for the long term, then the whole point of DCA -- the very definition -- is to keep on investing the same dollar amount no matter what the market does.

HOWEVER...

Your risk tolerance, goals and the time frame must be taken into consideration.

Putting 100% of your investments in a volatile fund like FXAIX is only considered a Good Idea if you're young and saving for the very long term.

Us older people have a lower risk tolerance and put more money in bonds and stocks with lower volatility.

Bottom line: balance your portfolio based upon your goals (and the plan you devise base on those goals), not upon your fears.

Remember the golden rule: Buy low, sell high.

The reason everyone is afraid to give you the obvious advice is that they're afraid you won't do that. And on average, they're right as rain.

What typically happens at this stage in the investment cycle (depression expected, but before its onset) is that people see a price fall in the TV news, and panic. They say "oh noes, this is the beginning of a recession, it's all down from here", and they bail out. And of course, the next day, the market goes back up and marches upward for another month, while they put nose-marks on the candy store's glass window. We don't want you to do that.

On the other hand, if you really, really study market cycles, and you know exactly what the curves and indicators look like for the past 20 recessions, and you know all about the false indicators too... And you look at the market on a particularly high day and go "now's the time" and sell... That's more the way to do that thing.

Then, you better know when to step back in, and that's a lot easier - everytime the TV news shows pictures of brokers jumping out of windows and Mad Max driving down Wall Street, buy.

This is called "Wall Street having a 2-for-1 sale".

It's still "timing the market", which is considered bad. But keep in mind it's considered bad for a reason; it is highly speculative, and brokers don't want to be sued by their clients for guessing wrong, a viewpoint always taken in 20/20 hindsight. To avoid that liability they created that old chestnut "don't try to time the market".

Obviously, your friends who lost it all in the 2008 recession bailed out after the drop, but failed to buy back in at the bottom because they feared it would only go lower and lower forever, and were emotionally put off by the volatility: they became afraid of the market. They broke both rules: buy low, and sell high.

Time in the market beats timing the market

Even if you are a near perfect market timer (you aren't ) selling and waiting for the dip will cause you to miss out on some growth and months of dividends that you could have reinvested. For more information try googling "dollar cost averaging vs buying the dip" and read articles like these: https://ofdollarsanddata.com/even-god-couldnt-beat-dollar-cost-averaging/

If you are worried about the US stock market it might be a good idea to start diversifying into other stock markets or investment products to spread the risk, but I would definitely keep dollar cost averaging.

If the market (and your stock) are going to drop significantly, it's a great idea to stop your DCA program. It's an even better idea to sell your stock.

If you sell your stock, you're going to pay taxes on the gain unless it's a sheltered account. That's not a bad thing if the market drops ~50% as it did in 2000 and 2008.

OTOH, if you sell your stock and it's just a small market correction, perhaps you pay some taxes and you definitely miss out to the upside until you realize that you were wrong and go back in.

So effectively, you are asking us to tell you what's going to happen in the future so that we can answer your question: "Is this a bad idea?" No one knows that answer in advance. So you just have to pick your poison. Ride it out or protect your portfolio value.

There are ways to hedge your position so that the market makes the decision for you but such hedging is beyond the scope of this limited space.

Much depends on your investment strategy and on the duration of the recession.

If you are investing long-term and the recession is going to be (or rather: you expect it to be) reasonably short, then selling can be a bad decision even if you are right. There is always overhead in buying/selling such as taxes, broker fees and whatever. If you are right, you need to re-enter the market at a point low enough to make a profit higher than this overhead, and also consider that this profit will be considered just that (profit) in the next tax calculation, even though it isn't actually profit to you, only compensation for your costs.

A short, not-too-serious recession is best waited out if you have a long-term strategy. The general advise in long-term investment is to largely ignore the market.

If you have a short-term strategy, then your whole plan is to profit from price fluctuations and a recession is basically just a large fluctuation. Yes, you should sell in such case, provided you are reasonably sure of your prediction. Then wait for the bottom and buy again. A professional broker once told me that they always try to buy/sell just before they expect the max/min to be hit, because it's too hard to predict the exact point and it's over too fast. That might depend on the market, though. They were into currencies.

If you have a long-term strategy and expect the recession to last for a considerable time (i.e. longer than you're willing to wait), selling and shifting your money to other investments is a common strategy. It's the reason real estate sometimes booms when the stock market tanks or why there's a run on gold and other physical valuables at such times. Here you want to beat the rush - as soon as everyone tries to get out of the stock market and into real estate or gold or diamond mining rights or whatever the financial magazines advertise this time as the safe harbour for your money, those prices will shoot up.

I agree with most of the answers already posted, but I am offering a different point of view. If you don't feel comfortable keeping your money in a market ETF, I would say diversify your portfolio that help reduce loss instead of maximizing profit.

Something to do is have your portfolio be part stocks/bonds (50/50, 80/20, or anything else depending on your risk tolerance) with rebalancing. Rebalancing basically takes profits from bonds during bear markets and invests them in on sale stocks, and takes profit from stocks and tucks them away into bonds during bull markets. Another thing you can do is invest in sectors that do well during a recession. Historically utilities and the healthcare sectors do well well (they still drop, but they typically don't drop as far or cut their dividends as much). But you are young enough that any any minor recession now will be dwarfed by gains over 20 years.

Also the best advice I've heard about waiting until after a recession to invest is:

There is always a next recession.

Once upon a time you would sell your equities and buy corporate bonds instead. As everyone else would be doing the same, the bonds would rise and stock fall, and assuming companies didn't all go bankrupt and fail to repay their bonds, this kind of defensive position would maintain your capital if not increase it.

However, that was a long time ago, QE broke that link, and now bonds have so much cheap money sloshing around in them there is little upside. but, there is still goverment bonds (gilts or treasuries) that you can buy into to preserve your capital. Currently I see gilts have in fact gone up by more than usual as people are moving into them. So you might have missed the boat on that - market timing is tricky after all!

An alternative is other defensive portfolios such as gold (whether physically backed, or a ETF derivative product that tracks prices) or some defensive equities such as consumer goods or utilities.

Merrill Lynch produced an investment clock a long time ago to describe what positions to take in the economy cycle, but as I said earlier, this has been rewound by central banks desperate to keep the good times rolling, so may not be quite as accurate as before.

The question of what to do is never easy to answer - one thing that has been mentioned is that long-term, it doesn't really matter what you do. Your best plan is to keep on adding to your portfolio and ignroe prices in the short term. If prices drop, then you will be buying more at cheaper values, which is probably a better thing for you if you're saving for the next 20 years. Over the next 20 years there will probably be at least 1 more recession to come.

If equities fall again, then govt bonds will at least maintain their value, if not necessarily rise by much more. This may be important to you.

I won't lecture you on timing the market. Obviously, if you could know that your stock was going to go down, then you would sell it. But then where do you put your money before a recession? I would recommend putting money in long term US treasury bonds as a hedge against a recession. When the economy tanks the fed cuts the federal funds rate, and that makes bonds that you owned at the higher rate more valuable. Moreover, longer duration bonds are impacted more by rate cuts then short term ones.

It's worth noting that you don't have to actually buy a bond to get this exposure, you can invest in a bond fund like VGLT or EDV. These are both ETFs which can be bought & sold like stocks.

Follow a general strategy where you set allocation limits (e.g.: 60% stock 40% bonds). Evaluate your portfolio periodically (e.g.: annually or quarterly). As your stocks increase in value they will throw the allocations off (e.g.: 62% stock, 38% bonds).

When you evaluate and find that the allocation is off then you sell off your stock and put the proceeds in bonds. This allows you to reap the growth of the stock. When a recession hits your periodic evaluation will show that stocks are lower/bonds higher so then you convert bonds to purchase stock (this allows you to buy when lower).

Using a fixed period means you don't have to time the market and generally you will be following the buy-low/sell-high when you make adjustments. I used an example ratio and allocation just for illustrative purposes. You of course should use instruments that you think best. You can replace stocks/bonds with High-Risk/Low-Risk, etc.

Lots of appropriate information in the other answers, but here's my story: Many years ago I worked a summer selling ice cream from a truck. The owner of the company explained to me that his was " ...a depression business. When the economy goes down, my business goes up." The rational was that when Mamma could not afford to send the kids to a movie, etc, she could at least come up with change for ice cream when the truck came around. When times were good there was less demand for such cheap relief. We sold the most in the areas of the city that were in perpetual depression - the poor section. The kids in the suburbs had other things to do with their money.

So the answer in part depends on what type of stocks you own, or would buy instead in the event of an economic downturn.