Does using a crossbow with the Sharpshooter feat change its range in underwater combat?Are weapons with the...
Sending mail to the Professor for PhD, after seeing his tweet
What powers or limits devil promotion?
How is погода (weather) a count noun?
Is the Basilisk Jaw a Slayer only drop?
Are there types of animals that can't make the trip to space? (physiologically)
Output impedance of TAPR QRPi?
Manager told a colleague of mine I was getting fired soon
Check if number is in list of numbers
What is the point of impeaching Trump?
Why is music is taught by reading sheet music?
Is morphing a creature effectively a cost?
Realistically, how much do you need to start investing?
Why do personal finance apps focus on outgoings rather than income
Why is ECB+CTR not a thing?
Does publication of the phone call ruin the basis for impeachment?
Could the Queen overturn the UK Supreme Court ruling regarding prorogation of Parliament?
Why Vegetable Stock is bitter, but Chicken Stock not?
Did Joe Biden "stop a prosecution" into his son in Ukraine? And did he brag about stopping the prosecution?
Why is there such a singular place for bird watching?
Table formatting with multicolumn
How can I find places to store/land a private airplane?
What is the difference between increasing volume and increasing gain?
Canteen Cutlery Issue
Digital Bananas
Does using a crossbow with the Sharpshooter feat change its range in underwater combat?
Are weapons with the “Thrown” property considered a “Ranged Weapon” for the purpose of sharpshooter?Does throwing a net underwater have disadvantage?Does a ranged attack against an adjacent enemy still have disadvantage even if you have the Crossbow Expert feat?How do attacks with an underwater target and an attacker on land (and the reverse) work?Do ranged weapon attacks against creatures restrained in a Watery Sphere have advantage?Do I add my ability modifier to the damage of the bonus-action attack granted by the Crossbow Expert feat?How does the Sharpshooter feat interact with the Hunter ranger's Volley feature?Ruling for Grappling a Creature Underwater While you are on Land?How do you calculate the range of an attack when attacking diagonally?
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{
margin-bottom:0;
}
$begingroup$
The "Underwater Combat" section of the Combat chapter (PHB, p. 198) reads:
A ranged weapon attack automatically misses a target beyond the weapon's normal range. Even against a target within normal range, the attack roll has disadvantage unless the weapon is a crossbow, a net, or a weapon that is thrown like a javelin (including a spear, trident, or dart).
The Sharpshooter feat (PHB, p. 170) reads:
Attacking at long range doesn't impose disadvantage on your ranged weapon attack rolls.
With both of those in mind, would a PC with a Hand Crossbow and the Sharpshooter feat be able to shoot further than 30 feet underwater?
dnd-5e feats ranged-attack underwater
$endgroup$
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
The "Underwater Combat" section of the Combat chapter (PHB, p. 198) reads:
A ranged weapon attack automatically misses a target beyond the weapon's normal range. Even against a target within normal range, the attack roll has disadvantage unless the weapon is a crossbow, a net, or a weapon that is thrown like a javelin (including a spear, trident, or dart).
The Sharpshooter feat (PHB, p. 170) reads:
Attacking at long range doesn't impose disadvantage on your ranged weapon attack rolls.
With both of those in mind, would a PC with a Hand Crossbow and the Sharpshooter feat be able to shoot further than 30 feet underwater?
dnd-5e feats ranged-attack underwater
$endgroup$
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
The "Underwater Combat" section of the Combat chapter (PHB, p. 198) reads:
A ranged weapon attack automatically misses a target beyond the weapon's normal range. Even against a target within normal range, the attack roll has disadvantage unless the weapon is a crossbow, a net, or a weapon that is thrown like a javelin (including a spear, trident, or dart).
The Sharpshooter feat (PHB, p. 170) reads:
Attacking at long range doesn't impose disadvantage on your ranged weapon attack rolls.
With both of those in mind, would a PC with a Hand Crossbow and the Sharpshooter feat be able to shoot further than 30 feet underwater?
dnd-5e feats ranged-attack underwater
$endgroup$
The "Underwater Combat" section of the Combat chapter (PHB, p. 198) reads:
A ranged weapon attack automatically misses a target beyond the weapon's normal range. Even against a target within normal range, the attack roll has disadvantage unless the weapon is a crossbow, a net, or a weapon that is thrown like a javelin (including a spear, trident, or dart).
The Sharpshooter feat (PHB, p. 170) reads:
Attacking at long range doesn't impose disadvantage on your ranged weapon attack rolls.
With both of those in mind, would a PC with a Hand Crossbow and the Sharpshooter feat be able to shoot further than 30 feet underwater?
dnd-5e feats ranged-attack underwater
dnd-5e feats ranged-attack underwater
edited 3 hours ago
V2Blast♦
34.4k5 gold badges123 silver badges216 bronze badges
34.4k5 gold badges123 silver badges216 bronze badges
asked 8 hours ago
RallozarXRallozarX
9792 silver badges16 bronze badges
9792 silver badges16 bronze badges
add a comment
|
add a comment
|
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
No: the maximum range is reduced.
The benefit is that the attack is not at disadvantage, though you get that benefit anyway from using a crossbow under water.
Specific Beats General
This book contains rules, especially in parts 2 and 3, that govern how
the game plays. That said, many racial traits, class features, spells,
magic items, monster abilities, and other game elements break the
general rules in some way, creating an exception to how the rest of
the game works. Remember this: If a specific rule contradicts a
general rule, the specific rule wins. Exceptions to the rules are
often minor. {snip} Magic accounts for most of the major exceptions to
the rules. (Basic Rules, p. 5)
This is one of those rulings that deals with two different cases of "specific over general" and leans more toward verisimilitude in favoring the "reduced range underwater" having more weight. One way to view this is that there is a global effect on all ranged weapons in terms of reduced range. Your DM could apply "Specific Beats General" in favor of the feat. Work with your DM.
A ranged weapon attack automatically misses a target beyond the
weapon’s normal range. Even against a target within normal range, the
attack roll has disadvantage unless the weapon is a crossbow, a net,
or a weapon that is thrown like a javelin (including a spear, trident,
or dart). Creatures and objects that are fully immersed in water have
resistance to fire damage. (Basic Rules, Ch 9; Underwater Combat)
From the Weapon Table:
Crossbow, hand 75 gp 1d6 piercing 3 lb. Ammunition (range 30/120),
light, loading
$endgroup$
5
$begingroup$
I wouldn't even say this is "specific beats general". The feat specifically states "Attacking at long range doesn't impose disadvantage on your ranged weapon attack rolls." while the underwater combat rules "A ranged weapon attack automatically misses a target beyond the weapon's normal range. Even against a target within normal range, the attack roll has disadvantage unless the weapon is a crossbow (...)". So there's no disadvantage to negate. At long range it misses no matter what. At normal range crossbows already don't have disadvantage underwater. So neither rule conflicts
$endgroup$
– Himitsu_no_Yami
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Himitsu_no_Yami Good point, I;ll revise a bit later.
$endgroup$
– KorvinStarmast
4 hours ago
add a comment
|
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "122"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/"u003ecc by-sa 4.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f156838%2fdoes-using-a-crossbow-with-the-sharpshooter-feat-change-its-range-in-underwater%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
No: the maximum range is reduced.
The benefit is that the attack is not at disadvantage, though you get that benefit anyway from using a crossbow under water.
Specific Beats General
This book contains rules, especially in parts 2 and 3, that govern how
the game plays. That said, many racial traits, class features, spells,
magic items, monster abilities, and other game elements break the
general rules in some way, creating an exception to how the rest of
the game works. Remember this: If a specific rule contradicts a
general rule, the specific rule wins. Exceptions to the rules are
often minor. {snip} Magic accounts for most of the major exceptions to
the rules. (Basic Rules, p. 5)
This is one of those rulings that deals with two different cases of "specific over general" and leans more toward verisimilitude in favoring the "reduced range underwater" having more weight. One way to view this is that there is a global effect on all ranged weapons in terms of reduced range. Your DM could apply "Specific Beats General" in favor of the feat. Work with your DM.
A ranged weapon attack automatically misses a target beyond the
weapon’s normal range. Even against a target within normal range, the
attack roll has disadvantage unless the weapon is a crossbow, a net,
or a weapon that is thrown like a javelin (including a spear, trident,
or dart). Creatures and objects that are fully immersed in water have
resistance to fire damage. (Basic Rules, Ch 9; Underwater Combat)
From the Weapon Table:
Crossbow, hand 75 gp 1d6 piercing 3 lb. Ammunition (range 30/120),
light, loading
$endgroup$
5
$begingroup$
I wouldn't even say this is "specific beats general". The feat specifically states "Attacking at long range doesn't impose disadvantage on your ranged weapon attack rolls." while the underwater combat rules "A ranged weapon attack automatically misses a target beyond the weapon's normal range. Even against a target within normal range, the attack roll has disadvantage unless the weapon is a crossbow (...)". So there's no disadvantage to negate. At long range it misses no matter what. At normal range crossbows already don't have disadvantage underwater. So neither rule conflicts
$endgroup$
– Himitsu_no_Yami
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Himitsu_no_Yami Good point, I;ll revise a bit later.
$endgroup$
– KorvinStarmast
4 hours ago
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
No: the maximum range is reduced.
The benefit is that the attack is not at disadvantage, though you get that benefit anyway from using a crossbow under water.
Specific Beats General
This book contains rules, especially in parts 2 and 3, that govern how
the game plays. That said, many racial traits, class features, spells,
magic items, monster abilities, and other game elements break the
general rules in some way, creating an exception to how the rest of
the game works. Remember this: If a specific rule contradicts a
general rule, the specific rule wins. Exceptions to the rules are
often minor. {snip} Magic accounts for most of the major exceptions to
the rules. (Basic Rules, p. 5)
This is one of those rulings that deals with two different cases of "specific over general" and leans more toward verisimilitude in favoring the "reduced range underwater" having more weight. One way to view this is that there is a global effect on all ranged weapons in terms of reduced range. Your DM could apply "Specific Beats General" in favor of the feat. Work with your DM.
A ranged weapon attack automatically misses a target beyond the
weapon’s normal range. Even against a target within normal range, the
attack roll has disadvantage unless the weapon is a crossbow, a net,
or a weapon that is thrown like a javelin (including a spear, trident,
or dart). Creatures and objects that are fully immersed in water have
resistance to fire damage. (Basic Rules, Ch 9; Underwater Combat)
From the Weapon Table:
Crossbow, hand 75 gp 1d6 piercing 3 lb. Ammunition (range 30/120),
light, loading
$endgroup$
5
$begingroup$
I wouldn't even say this is "specific beats general". The feat specifically states "Attacking at long range doesn't impose disadvantage on your ranged weapon attack rolls." while the underwater combat rules "A ranged weapon attack automatically misses a target beyond the weapon's normal range. Even against a target within normal range, the attack roll has disadvantage unless the weapon is a crossbow (...)". So there's no disadvantage to negate. At long range it misses no matter what. At normal range crossbows already don't have disadvantage underwater. So neither rule conflicts
$endgroup$
– Himitsu_no_Yami
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Himitsu_no_Yami Good point, I;ll revise a bit later.
$endgroup$
– KorvinStarmast
4 hours ago
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
No: the maximum range is reduced.
The benefit is that the attack is not at disadvantage, though you get that benefit anyway from using a crossbow under water.
Specific Beats General
This book contains rules, especially in parts 2 and 3, that govern how
the game plays. That said, many racial traits, class features, spells,
magic items, monster abilities, and other game elements break the
general rules in some way, creating an exception to how the rest of
the game works. Remember this: If a specific rule contradicts a
general rule, the specific rule wins. Exceptions to the rules are
often minor. {snip} Magic accounts for most of the major exceptions to
the rules. (Basic Rules, p. 5)
This is one of those rulings that deals with two different cases of "specific over general" and leans more toward verisimilitude in favoring the "reduced range underwater" having more weight. One way to view this is that there is a global effect on all ranged weapons in terms of reduced range. Your DM could apply "Specific Beats General" in favor of the feat. Work with your DM.
A ranged weapon attack automatically misses a target beyond the
weapon’s normal range. Even against a target within normal range, the
attack roll has disadvantage unless the weapon is a crossbow, a net,
or a weapon that is thrown like a javelin (including a spear, trident,
or dart). Creatures and objects that are fully immersed in water have
resistance to fire damage. (Basic Rules, Ch 9; Underwater Combat)
From the Weapon Table:
Crossbow, hand 75 gp 1d6 piercing 3 lb. Ammunition (range 30/120),
light, loading
$endgroup$
No: the maximum range is reduced.
The benefit is that the attack is not at disadvantage, though you get that benefit anyway from using a crossbow under water.
Specific Beats General
This book contains rules, especially in parts 2 and 3, that govern how
the game plays. That said, many racial traits, class features, spells,
magic items, monster abilities, and other game elements break the
general rules in some way, creating an exception to how the rest of
the game works. Remember this: If a specific rule contradicts a
general rule, the specific rule wins. Exceptions to the rules are
often minor. {snip} Magic accounts for most of the major exceptions to
the rules. (Basic Rules, p. 5)
This is one of those rulings that deals with two different cases of "specific over general" and leans more toward verisimilitude in favoring the "reduced range underwater" having more weight. One way to view this is that there is a global effect on all ranged weapons in terms of reduced range. Your DM could apply "Specific Beats General" in favor of the feat. Work with your DM.
A ranged weapon attack automatically misses a target beyond the
weapon’s normal range. Even against a target within normal range, the
attack roll has disadvantage unless the weapon is a crossbow, a net,
or a weapon that is thrown like a javelin (including a spear, trident,
or dart). Creatures and objects that are fully immersed in water have
resistance to fire damage. (Basic Rules, Ch 9; Underwater Combat)
From the Weapon Table:
Crossbow, hand 75 gp 1d6 piercing 3 lb. Ammunition (range 30/120),
light, loading
edited 7 hours ago
answered 8 hours ago
KorvinStarmastKorvinStarmast
96.4k23 gold badges325 silver badges520 bronze badges
96.4k23 gold badges325 silver badges520 bronze badges
5
$begingroup$
I wouldn't even say this is "specific beats general". The feat specifically states "Attacking at long range doesn't impose disadvantage on your ranged weapon attack rolls." while the underwater combat rules "A ranged weapon attack automatically misses a target beyond the weapon's normal range. Even against a target within normal range, the attack roll has disadvantage unless the weapon is a crossbow (...)". So there's no disadvantage to negate. At long range it misses no matter what. At normal range crossbows already don't have disadvantage underwater. So neither rule conflicts
$endgroup$
– Himitsu_no_Yami
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Himitsu_no_Yami Good point, I;ll revise a bit later.
$endgroup$
– KorvinStarmast
4 hours ago
add a comment
|
5
$begingroup$
I wouldn't even say this is "specific beats general". The feat specifically states "Attacking at long range doesn't impose disadvantage on your ranged weapon attack rolls." while the underwater combat rules "A ranged weapon attack automatically misses a target beyond the weapon's normal range. Even against a target within normal range, the attack roll has disadvantage unless the weapon is a crossbow (...)". So there's no disadvantage to negate. At long range it misses no matter what. At normal range crossbows already don't have disadvantage underwater. So neither rule conflicts
$endgroup$
– Himitsu_no_Yami
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Himitsu_no_Yami Good point, I;ll revise a bit later.
$endgroup$
– KorvinStarmast
4 hours ago
5
5
$begingroup$
I wouldn't even say this is "specific beats general". The feat specifically states "Attacking at long range doesn't impose disadvantage on your ranged weapon attack rolls." while the underwater combat rules "A ranged weapon attack automatically misses a target beyond the weapon's normal range. Even against a target within normal range, the attack roll has disadvantage unless the weapon is a crossbow (...)". So there's no disadvantage to negate. At long range it misses no matter what. At normal range crossbows already don't have disadvantage underwater. So neither rule conflicts
$endgroup$
– Himitsu_no_Yami
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
I wouldn't even say this is "specific beats general". The feat specifically states "Attacking at long range doesn't impose disadvantage on your ranged weapon attack rolls." while the underwater combat rules "A ranged weapon attack automatically misses a target beyond the weapon's normal range. Even against a target within normal range, the attack roll has disadvantage unless the weapon is a crossbow (...)". So there's no disadvantage to negate. At long range it misses no matter what. At normal range crossbows already don't have disadvantage underwater. So neither rule conflicts
$endgroup$
– Himitsu_no_Yami
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Himitsu_no_Yami Good point, I;ll revise a bit later.
$endgroup$
– KorvinStarmast
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Himitsu_no_Yami Good point, I;ll revise a bit later.
$endgroup$
– KorvinStarmast
4 hours ago
add a comment
|
Thanks for contributing an answer to Role-playing Games Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f156838%2fdoes-using-a-crossbow-with-the-sharpshooter-feat-change-its-range-in-underwater%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown