Does using a crossbow with the Sharpshooter feat change its range in underwater combat?Are weapons with the...

Sending mail to the Professor for PhD, after seeing his tweet

What powers or limits devil promotion?

How is погода (weather) a count noun?

Is the Basilisk Jaw a Slayer only drop?

Are there types of animals that can't make the trip to space? (physiologically)

Output impedance of TAPR QRPi?

Manager told a colleague of mine I was getting fired soon

Check if number is in list of numbers

What is the point of impeaching Trump?

Why is music is taught by reading sheet music?

Is morphing a creature effectively a cost?

Realistically, how much do you need to start investing?

Why do personal finance apps focus on outgoings rather than income

Why is ECB+CTR not a thing?

Does publication of the phone call ruin the basis for impeachment?

Could the Queen overturn the UK Supreme Court ruling regarding prorogation of Parliament?

Why Vegetable Stock is bitter, but Chicken Stock not?

Did Joe Biden "stop a prosecution" into his son in Ukraine? And did he brag about stopping the prosecution?

Why is there such a singular place for bird watching?

Table formatting with multicolumn

How can I find places to store/land a private airplane?

What is the difference between increasing volume and increasing gain?

Canteen Cutlery Issue

Digital Bananas



Does using a crossbow with the Sharpshooter feat change its range in underwater combat?


Are weapons with the “Thrown” property considered a “Ranged Weapon” for the purpose of sharpshooter?Does throwing a net underwater have disadvantage?Does a ranged attack against an adjacent enemy still have disadvantage even if you have the Crossbow Expert feat?How do attacks with an underwater target and an attacker on land (and the reverse) work?Do ranged weapon attacks against creatures restrained in a Watery Sphere have advantage?Do I add my ability modifier to the damage of the bonus-action attack granted by the Crossbow Expert feat?How does the Sharpshooter feat interact with the Hunter ranger's Volley feature?Ruling for Grappling a Creature Underwater While you are on Land?How do you calculate the range of an attack when attacking diagonally?






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{
margin-bottom:0;
}








5












$begingroup$


The "Underwater Combat" section of the Combat chapter (PHB, p. 198) reads:




A ranged weapon attack automatically misses a target beyond the weapon's normal range. Even against a target within normal range, the attack roll has disadvantage unless the weapon is a crossbow, a net, or a weapon that is thrown like a javelin (including a spear, trident, or dart).




The Sharpshooter feat (PHB, p. 170) reads:




Attacking at long range doesn't impose disadvantage on your ranged weapon attack rolls.




With both of those in mind, would a PC with a Hand Crossbow and the Sharpshooter feat be able to shoot further than 30 feet underwater?










share|improve this question











$endgroup$





















    5












    $begingroup$


    The "Underwater Combat" section of the Combat chapter (PHB, p. 198) reads:




    A ranged weapon attack automatically misses a target beyond the weapon's normal range. Even against a target within normal range, the attack roll has disadvantage unless the weapon is a crossbow, a net, or a weapon that is thrown like a javelin (including a spear, trident, or dart).




    The Sharpshooter feat (PHB, p. 170) reads:




    Attacking at long range doesn't impose disadvantage on your ranged weapon attack rolls.




    With both of those in mind, would a PC with a Hand Crossbow and the Sharpshooter feat be able to shoot further than 30 feet underwater?










    share|improve this question











    $endgroup$

















      5












      5








      5





      $begingroup$


      The "Underwater Combat" section of the Combat chapter (PHB, p. 198) reads:




      A ranged weapon attack automatically misses a target beyond the weapon's normal range. Even against a target within normal range, the attack roll has disadvantage unless the weapon is a crossbow, a net, or a weapon that is thrown like a javelin (including a spear, trident, or dart).




      The Sharpshooter feat (PHB, p. 170) reads:




      Attacking at long range doesn't impose disadvantage on your ranged weapon attack rolls.




      With both of those in mind, would a PC with a Hand Crossbow and the Sharpshooter feat be able to shoot further than 30 feet underwater?










      share|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      The "Underwater Combat" section of the Combat chapter (PHB, p. 198) reads:




      A ranged weapon attack automatically misses a target beyond the weapon's normal range. Even against a target within normal range, the attack roll has disadvantage unless the weapon is a crossbow, a net, or a weapon that is thrown like a javelin (including a spear, trident, or dart).




      The Sharpshooter feat (PHB, p. 170) reads:




      Attacking at long range doesn't impose disadvantage on your ranged weapon attack rolls.




      With both of those in mind, would a PC with a Hand Crossbow and the Sharpshooter feat be able to shoot further than 30 feet underwater?







      dnd-5e feats ranged-attack underwater






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited 3 hours ago









      V2Blast

      34.4k5 gold badges123 silver badges216 bronze badges




      34.4k5 gold badges123 silver badges216 bronze badges










      asked 8 hours ago









      RallozarXRallozarX

      9792 silver badges16 bronze badges




      9792 silver badges16 bronze badges

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          7














          $begingroup$

          No: the maximum range is reduced.



          The benefit is that the attack is not at disadvantage, though you get that benefit anyway from using a crossbow under water.




          Specific Beats General

          This book contains rules, especially in parts 2 and 3, that govern how
          the game plays. That said, many racial traits, class features, spells,
          magic items, monster abilities, and other game elements break the
          general rules in some way, creating an exception to how the rest of
          the game works. Remember this: If a specific rule contradicts a
          general rule, the specific rule wins. Exceptions to the rules are
          often minor. {snip} Magic accounts for most of the major exceptions to
          the rules. (Basic Rules, p. 5)




          This is one of those rulings that deals with two different cases of "specific over general" and leans more toward verisimilitude in favoring the "reduced range underwater" having more weight. One way to view this is that there is a global effect on all ranged weapons in terms of reduced range. Your DM could apply "Specific Beats General" in favor of the feat. Work with your DM.




          A ranged weapon attack automatically misses a target beyond the
          weapon’s normal range. Even against a target within normal range, the
          attack roll has disadvantage unless the weapon is a crossbow, a net,
          or a weapon that is thrown like a javelin (including a spear, trident,
          or dart). Creatures and objects that are fully immersed in water have
          resistance to fire damage. (Basic Rules, Ch 9; Underwater Combat)




          From the Weapon Table:




          Crossbow, hand 75 gp 1d6 piercing 3 lb. Ammunition (range 30/120),
          light, loading







          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$











          • 5




            $begingroup$
            I wouldn't even say this is "specific beats general". The feat specifically states "Attacking at long range doesn't impose disadvantage on your ranged weapon attack rolls." while the underwater combat rules "A ranged weapon attack automatically misses a target beyond the weapon's normal range. Even against a target within normal range, the attack roll has disadvantage unless the weapon is a crossbow (...)". So there's no disadvantage to negate. At long range it misses no matter what. At normal range crossbows already don't have disadvantage underwater. So neither rule conflicts
            $endgroup$
            – Himitsu_no_Yami
            6 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            @Himitsu_no_Yami Good point, I;ll revise a bit later.
            $endgroup$
            – KorvinStarmast
            4 hours ago













          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "122"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/"u003ecc by-sa 4.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });















          draft saved

          draft discarded
















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f156838%2fdoes-using-a-crossbow-with-the-sharpshooter-feat-change-its-range-in-underwater%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          7














          $begingroup$

          No: the maximum range is reduced.



          The benefit is that the attack is not at disadvantage, though you get that benefit anyway from using a crossbow under water.




          Specific Beats General

          This book contains rules, especially in parts 2 and 3, that govern how
          the game plays. That said, many racial traits, class features, spells,
          magic items, monster abilities, and other game elements break the
          general rules in some way, creating an exception to how the rest of
          the game works. Remember this: If a specific rule contradicts a
          general rule, the specific rule wins. Exceptions to the rules are
          often minor. {snip} Magic accounts for most of the major exceptions to
          the rules. (Basic Rules, p. 5)




          This is one of those rulings that deals with two different cases of "specific over general" and leans more toward verisimilitude in favoring the "reduced range underwater" having more weight. One way to view this is that there is a global effect on all ranged weapons in terms of reduced range. Your DM could apply "Specific Beats General" in favor of the feat. Work with your DM.




          A ranged weapon attack automatically misses a target beyond the
          weapon’s normal range. Even against a target within normal range, the
          attack roll has disadvantage unless the weapon is a crossbow, a net,
          or a weapon that is thrown like a javelin (including a spear, trident,
          or dart). Creatures and objects that are fully immersed in water have
          resistance to fire damage. (Basic Rules, Ch 9; Underwater Combat)




          From the Weapon Table:




          Crossbow, hand 75 gp 1d6 piercing 3 lb. Ammunition (range 30/120),
          light, loading







          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$











          • 5




            $begingroup$
            I wouldn't even say this is "specific beats general". The feat specifically states "Attacking at long range doesn't impose disadvantage on your ranged weapon attack rolls." while the underwater combat rules "A ranged weapon attack automatically misses a target beyond the weapon's normal range. Even against a target within normal range, the attack roll has disadvantage unless the weapon is a crossbow (...)". So there's no disadvantage to negate. At long range it misses no matter what. At normal range crossbows already don't have disadvantage underwater. So neither rule conflicts
            $endgroup$
            – Himitsu_no_Yami
            6 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            @Himitsu_no_Yami Good point, I;ll revise a bit later.
            $endgroup$
            – KorvinStarmast
            4 hours ago
















          7














          $begingroup$

          No: the maximum range is reduced.



          The benefit is that the attack is not at disadvantage, though you get that benefit anyway from using a crossbow under water.




          Specific Beats General

          This book contains rules, especially in parts 2 and 3, that govern how
          the game plays. That said, many racial traits, class features, spells,
          magic items, monster abilities, and other game elements break the
          general rules in some way, creating an exception to how the rest of
          the game works. Remember this: If a specific rule contradicts a
          general rule, the specific rule wins. Exceptions to the rules are
          often minor. {snip} Magic accounts for most of the major exceptions to
          the rules. (Basic Rules, p. 5)




          This is one of those rulings that deals with two different cases of "specific over general" and leans more toward verisimilitude in favoring the "reduced range underwater" having more weight. One way to view this is that there is a global effect on all ranged weapons in terms of reduced range. Your DM could apply "Specific Beats General" in favor of the feat. Work with your DM.




          A ranged weapon attack automatically misses a target beyond the
          weapon’s normal range. Even against a target within normal range, the
          attack roll has disadvantage unless the weapon is a crossbow, a net,
          or a weapon that is thrown like a javelin (including a spear, trident,
          or dart). Creatures and objects that are fully immersed in water have
          resistance to fire damage. (Basic Rules, Ch 9; Underwater Combat)




          From the Weapon Table:




          Crossbow, hand 75 gp 1d6 piercing 3 lb. Ammunition (range 30/120),
          light, loading







          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$











          • 5




            $begingroup$
            I wouldn't even say this is "specific beats general". The feat specifically states "Attacking at long range doesn't impose disadvantage on your ranged weapon attack rolls." while the underwater combat rules "A ranged weapon attack automatically misses a target beyond the weapon's normal range. Even against a target within normal range, the attack roll has disadvantage unless the weapon is a crossbow (...)". So there's no disadvantage to negate. At long range it misses no matter what. At normal range crossbows already don't have disadvantage underwater. So neither rule conflicts
            $endgroup$
            – Himitsu_no_Yami
            6 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            @Himitsu_no_Yami Good point, I;ll revise a bit later.
            $endgroup$
            – KorvinStarmast
            4 hours ago














          7














          7










          7







          $begingroup$

          No: the maximum range is reduced.



          The benefit is that the attack is not at disadvantage, though you get that benefit anyway from using a crossbow under water.




          Specific Beats General

          This book contains rules, especially in parts 2 and 3, that govern how
          the game plays. That said, many racial traits, class features, spells,
          magic items, monster abilities, and other game elements break the
          general rules in some way, creating an exception to how the rest of
          the game works. Remember this: If a specific rule contradicts a
          general rule, the specific rule wins. Exceptions to the rules are
          often minor. {snip} Magic accounts for most of the major exceptions to
          the rules. (Basic Rules, p. 5)




          This is one of those rulings that deals with two different cases of "specific over general" and leans more toward verisimilitude in favoring the "reduced range underwater" having more weight. One way to view this is that there is a global effect on all ranged weapons in terms of reduced range. Your DM could apply "Specific Beats General" in favor of the feat. Work with your DM.




          A ranged weapon attack automatically misses a target beyond the
          weapon’s normal range. Even against a target within normal range, the
          attack roll has disadvantage unless the weapon is a crossbow, a net,
          or a weapon that is thrown like a javelin (including a spear, trident,
          or dart). Creatures and objects that are fully immersed in water have
          resistance to fire damage. (Basic Rules, Ch 9; Underwater Combat)




          From the Weapon Table:




          Crossbow, hand 75 gp 1d6 piercing 3 lb. Ammunition (range 30/120),
          light, loading







          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$



          No: the maximum range is reduced.



          The benefit is that the attack is not at disadvantage, though you get that benefit anyway from using a crossbow under water.




          Specific Beats General

          This book contains rules, especially in parts 2 and 3, that govern how
          the game plays. That said, many racial traits, class features, spells,
          magic items, monster abilities, and other game elements break the
          general rules in some way, creating an exception to how the rest of
          the game works. Remember this: If a specific rule contradicts a
          general rule, the specific rule wins. Exceptions to the rules are
          often minor. {snip} Magic accounts for most of the major exceptions to
          the rules. (Basic Rules, p. 5)




          This is one of those rulings that deals with two different cases of "specific over general" and leans more toward verisimilitude in favoring the "reduced range underwater" having more weight. One way to view this is that there is a global effect on all ranged weapons in terms of reduced range. Your DM could apply "Specific Beats General" in favor of the feat. Work with your DM.




          A ranged weapon attack automatically misses a target beyond the
          weapon’s normal range. Even against a target within normal range, the
          attack roll has disadvantage unless the weapon is a crossbow, a net,
          or a weapon that is thrown like a javelin (including a spear, trident,
          or dart). Creatures and objects that are fully immersed in water have
          resistance to fire damage. (Basic Rules, Ch 9; Underwater Combat)




          From the Weapon Table:




          Crossbow, hand 75 gp 1d6 piercing 3 lb. Ammunition (range 30/120),
          light, loading








          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited 7 hours ago

























          answered 8 hours ago









          KorvinStarmastKorvinStarmast

          96.4k23 gold badges325 silver badges520 bronze badges




          96.4k23 gold badges325 silver badges520 bronze badges











          • 5




            $begingroup$
            I wouldn't even say this is "specific beats general". The feat specifically states "Attacking at long range doesn't impose disadvantage on your ranged weapon attack rolls." while the underwater combat rules "A ranged weapon attack automatically misses a target beyond the weapon's normal range. Even against a target within normal range, the attack roll has disadvantage unless the weapon is a crossbow (...)". So there's no disadvantage to negate. At long range it misses no matter what. At normal range crossbows already don't have disadvantage underwater. So neither rule conflicts
            $endgroup$
            – Himitsu_no_Yami
            6 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            @Himitsu_no_Yami Good point, I;ll revise a bit later.
            $endgroup$
            – KorvinStarmast
            4 hours ago














          • 5




            $begingroup$
            I wouldn't even say this is "specific beats general". The feat specifically states "Attacking at long range doesn't impose disadvantage on your ranged weapon attack rolls." while the underwater combat rules "A ranged weapon attack automatically misses a target beyond the weapon's normal range. Even against a target within normal range, the attack roll has disadvantage unless the weapon is a crossbow (...)". So there's no disadvantage to negate. At long range it misses no matter what. At normal range crossbows already don't have disadvantage underwater. So neither rule conflicts
            $endgroup$
            – Himitsu_no_Yami
            6 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            @Himitsu_no_Yami Good point, I;ll revise a bit later.
            $endgroup$
            – KorvinStarmast
            4 hours ago








          5




          5




          $begingroup$
          I wouldn't even say this is "specific beats general". The feat specifically states "Attacking at long range doesn't impose disadvantage on your ranged weapon attack rolls." while the underwater combat rules "A ranged weapon attack automatically misses a target beyond the weapon's normal range. Even against a target within normal range, the attack roll has disadvantage unless the weapon is a crossbow (...)". So there's no disadvantage to negate. At long range it misses no matter what. At normal range crossbows already don't have disadvantage underwater. So neither rule conflicts
          $endgroup$
          – Himitsu_no_Yami
          6 hours ago




          $begingroup$
          I wouldn't even say this is "specific beats general". The feat specifically states "Attacking at long range doesn't impose disadvantage on your ranged weapon attack rolls." while the underwater combat rules "A ranged weapon attack automatically misses a target beyond the weapon's normal range. Even against a target within normal range, the attack roll has disadvantage unless the weapon is a crossbow (...)". So there's no disadvantage to negate. At long range it misses no matter what. At normal range crossbows already don't have disadvantage underwater. So neither rule conflicts
          $endgroup$
          – Himitsu_no_Yami
          6 hours ago












          $begingroup$
          @Himitsu_no_Yami Good point, I;ll revise a bit later.
          $endgroup$
          – KorvinStarmast
          4 hours ago




          $begingroup$
          @Himitsu_no_Yami Good point, I;ll revise a bit later.
          $endgroup$
          – KorvinStarmast
          4 hours ago



















          draft saved

          draft discarded



















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Role-playing Games Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f156838%2fdoes-using-a-crossbow-with-the-sharpshooter-feat-change-its-range-in-underwater%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Taj Mahal Inhaltsverzeichnis Aufbau | Geschichte | 350-Jahr-Feier | Heutige Bedeutung | Siehe auch |...

          Baia Sprie Cuprins Etimologie | Istorie | Demografie | Politică și administrație | Arii naturale...

          Nicolae Petrescu-Găină Cuprins Biografie | Opera | In memoriam | Varia | Controverse, incertitudini...