How many stack cables would be needed if we want to stack two 3850 switchesStacking Different Model Dell...
Do interval ratios take overtones into account or solely the fundamental frequency?
GPLv3 forces us to make code available, but to who?
Can a passenger predict that an airline is about to go bankrupt?
Read-once memory
How can the dynamic linker/loader itself be dynamically linked as reported by `file`?
Does variance make sense in a fully immutable language?
"until mine is on tight" is a idiom?
What in my code changed between MacTeX 2017 and MacTex 2019?
How many stack cables would be needed if we want to stack two 3850 switches
Is determiner 'a' needed here?
Why is STARTTLS still used?
Why Italian monolingual dictionaries usually take complex/archaic examples from books instead of creating simple examples?
How to convert what I'm singing to notes
what organs or modifications would be needed to have hairy fish?
Detail vs. filler
What can Thomas Cook customers who have not yet departed do now it has stopped operating?
Concerning a relationship in the team
Whaling ship logistics
Delete n lines skip 1 line script
Why does C++ have 'Undefined Behaviour' and other languages like C# or Java don't?
Lost passport which have valid student visa but I make new passport unable paste
How far in Advance do I need to book tickets on the West Highland Line in Scotland for a Multi-part Journey?
Format columns in output with awk
Create the same subfolders in another folder
How many stack cables would be needed if we want to stack two 3850 switches
Stacking Different Model Dell SwitchesCreating one virtual switch that extends over two HP 2920-48G?Netgear SFP and trunking between three switchesTrouble Cascading VLANs Cisco SwitchesAddition of new switch to an existing 3850 stackRemove switch provisioning from individual switchesStacking master and member correctlyStack cable connection concept in Cisco switchStacking Dell N3000 with and without stacking cable (distance)
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}
How many stack cables would be needed if we want to stack two 3850 switches :
We have one 3850 switch and planning to add one more.
So my guess is only one Power & One data stack cable would be fine.
Or please let me know if it is mandatory to loop the cable with two Power & two data stack cable?
cisco switch stacking cisco-3850 stackwise
add a comment
|
How many stack cables would be needed if we want to stack two 3850 switches :
We have one 3850 switch and planning to add one more.
So my guess is only one Power & One data stack cable would be fine.
Or please let me know if it is mandatory to loop the cable with two Power & two data stack cable?
cisco switch stacking cisco-3850 stackwise
add a comment
|
How many stack cables would be needed if we want to stack two 3850 switches :
We have one 3850 switch and planning to add one more.
So my guess is only one Power & One data stack cable would be fine.
Or please let me know if it is mandatory to loop the cable with two Power & two data stack cable?
cisco switch stacking cisco-3850 stackwise
How many stack cables would be needed if we want to stack two 3850 switches :
We have one 3850 switch and planning to add one more.
So my guess is only one Power & One data stack cable would be fine.
Or please let me know if it is mandatory to loop the cable with two Power & two data stack cable?
cisco switch stacking cisco-3850 stackwise
cisco switch stacking cisco-3850 stackwise
edited 9 hours ago
Ron Maupin♦
73.2k14 gold badges75 silver badges136 bronze badges
73.2k14 gold badges75 silver badges136 bronze badges
asked 10 hours ago
shailendra harinkhedeshailendra harinkhede
10910 bronze badges
10910 bronze badges
add a comment
|
add a comment
|
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
How many stack cables would be needed if we want to stack two 3850 switches : We have one 3850 switch and planning to add one more. So my guess is only one Power & One data stack cable would be fine. Or please let me know if it is mandatory to loop the cable with two Power & two data stack cable?
Minimum (and improperly), one stacking cable (data). However this is a bad idea as any issue with this cable will split your stack into standalone devices.
Minimum and properly, two stacking cables (data). Providing the loop is the proper (and documented) way to stack these switches. If one cable gets damaged or needs to be disconnected for some reason, the stack remains a stack.
The power stacking cables are purely optional, but add flexibility which can be useful and cost saving depending on the deployment. This allows the switches to "share" their power supplies with each other. Again, the loop is the correct way to utilize this feature.
Let's say that your power needs on each switch is about 400W. With the power stacking cables and a single 1100W power supply in each switch, you can have fully redundant power. Or you could skip the power stacking cables and put two smaller power supplies in each switch, which means you have four power cables to plug into outlets (if you can't use power strips --policy or regulation reasons-- this may exceed your available electrical outlets).
The actual implementation on power (and if you need the power stack cables) is going to highly depend on your situation and the potential future needs of your deployment. For example, if you know that there will be a VoIP rollout next year and you will need more power for PoE phones, you may want to leave the additional power supply slot available to add more power at that time.
Thanks ....thats explains in a very detailed.
– shailendra harinkhede
7 hours ago
add a comment
|
A stack should be connected in a loop, with a stack cable for each switch. With two switches, that would be two stack cables, three switches three stack cables, etc. that means Switch 1 connects to Switch 2 that connects to Switch 3, etc. (up to a total of nine switches in a data stack), the last switch then connects back to Switch 1. With larger stacks, you may need to buy one longer stack cable.
Connecting the stack in a loop prevents splitting the stack when a switch or link fails. Not using a loop will create two separate stacks where each thinks it is the original stack.
The power stack works the same way, but there is a limitation of four switches for the power stack, so that more than four switches could be in a data stack, but you would have more than one power stack in the data stack. You also need to take into account the power used for the power stack, and the power supplies in each switch. You could get into a situation where you do not have enough power to power the stack, or you could have enough to power the stack in a failure, but not enough power to reboot a switch or the stack (rebooting require more power than running at a steady state).
Thanks for prompt response. I was aware about multiple switches we need to make loop. But i had doubt for two switches.
– shailendra harinkhede
9 hours ago
It doesn't matter how many switches in a stack (as long as it is more than one). You could end up with two separate stacks that each thinks it is the stack. That can happen with two switches if the link between them fails. Each switch would think it is what remains of the original switch stack.
– Ron Maupin♦
9 hours ago
add a comment
|
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "496"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/"u003ecc by-sa 4.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fnetworkengineering.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f62651%2fhow-many-stack-cables-would-be-needed-if-we-want-to-stack-two-3850-switches%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
How many stack cables would be needed if we want to stack two 3850 switches : We have one 3850 switch and planning to add one more. So my guess is only one Power & One data stack cable would be fine. Or please let me know if it is mandatory to loop the cable with two Power & two data stack cable?
Minimum (and improperly), one stacking cable (data). However this is a bad idea as any issue with this cable will split your stack into standalone devices.
Minimum and properly, two stacking cables (data). Providing the loop is the proper (and documented) way to stack these switches. If one cable gets damaged or needs to be disconnected for some reason, the stack remains a stack.
The power stacking cables are purely optional, but add flexibility which can be useful and cost saving depending on the deployment. This allows the switches to "share" their power supplies with each other. Again, the loop is the correct way to utilize this feature.
Let's say that your power needs on each switch is about 400W. With the power stacking cables and a single 1100W power supply in each switch, you can have fully redundant power. Or you could skip the power stacking cables and put two smaller power supplies in each switch, which means you have four power cables to plug into outlets (if you can't use power strips --policy or regulation reasons-- this may exceed your available electrical outlets).
The actual implementation on power (and if you need the power stack cables) is going to highly depend on your situation and the potential future needs of your deployment. For example, if you know that there will be a VoIP rollout next year and you will need more power for PoE phones, you may want to leave the additional power supply slot available to add more power at that time.
Thanks ....thats explains in a very detailed.
– shailendra harinkhede
7 hours ago
add a comment
|
How many stack cables would be needed if we want to stack two 3850 switches : We have one 3850 switch and planning to add one more. So my guess is only one Power & One data stack cable would be fine. Or please let me know if it is mandatory to loop the cable with two Power & two data stack cable?
Minimum (and improperly), one stacking cable (data). However this is a bad idea as any issue with this cable will split your stack into standalone devices.
Minimum and properly, two stacking cables (data). Providing the loop is the proper (and documented) way to stack these switches. If one cable gets damaged or needs to be disconnected for some reason, the stack remains a stack.
The power stacking cables are purely optional, but add flexibility which can be useful and cost saving depending on the deployment. This allows the switches to "share" their power supplies with each other. Again, the loop is the correct way to utilize this feature.
Let's say that your power needs on each switch is about 400W. With the power stacking cables and a single 1100W power supply in each switch, you can have fully redundant power. Or you could skip the power stacking cables and put two smaller power supplies in each switch, which means you have four power cables to plug into outlets (if you can't use power strips --policy or regulation reasons-- this may exceed your available electrical outlets).
The actual implementation on power (and if you need the power stack cables) is going to highly depend on your situation and the potential future needs of your deployment. For example, if you know that there will be a VoIP rollout next year and you will need more power for PoE phones, you may want to leave the additional power supply slot available to add more power at that time.
Thanks ....thats explains in a very detailed.
– shailendra harinkhede
7 hours ago
add a comment
|
How many stack cables would be needed if we want to stack two 3850 switches : We have one 3850 switch and planning to add one more. So my guess is only one Power & One data stack cable would be fine. Or please let me know if it is mandatory to loop the cable with two Power & two data stack cable?
Minimum (and improperly), one stacking cable (data). However this is a bad idea as any issue with this cable will split your stack into standalone devices.
Minimum and properly, two stacking cables (data). Providing the loop is the proper (and documented) way to stack these switches. If one cable gets damaged or needs to be disconnected for some reason, the stack remains a stack.
The power stacking cables are purely optional, but add flexibility which can be useful and cost saving depending on the deployment. This allows the switches to "share" their power supplies with each other. Again, the loop is the correct way to utilize this feature.
Let's say that your power needs on each switch is about 400W. With the power stacking cables and a single 1100W power supply in each switch, you can have fully redundant power. Or you could skip the power stacking cables and put two smaller power supplies in each switch, which means you have four power cables to plug into outlets (if you can't use power strips --policy or regulation reasons-- this may exceed your available electrical outlets).
The actual implementation on power (and if you need the power stack cables) is going to highly depend on your situation and the potential future needs of your deployment. For example, if you know that there will be a VoIP rollout next year and you will need more power for PoE phones, you may want to leave the additional power supply slot available to add more power at that time.
How many stack cables would be needed if we want to stack two 3850 switches : We have one 3850 switch and planning to add one more. So my guess is only one Power & One data stack cable would be fine. Or please let me know if it is mandatory to loop the cable with two Power & two data stack cable?
Minimum (and improperly), one stacking cable (data). However this is a bad idea as any issue with this cable will split your stack into standalone devices.
Minimum and properly, two stacking cables (data). Providing the loop is the proper (and documented) way to stack these switches. If one cable gets damaged or needs to be disconnected for some reason, the stack remains a stack.
The power stacking cables are purely optional, but add flexibility which can be useful and cost saving depending on the deployment. This allows the switches to "share" their power supplies with each other. Again, the loop is the correct way to utilize this feature.
Let's say that your power needs on each switch is about 400W. With the power stacking cables and a single 1100W power supply in each switch, you can have fully redundant power. Or you could skip the power stacking cables and put two smaller power supplies in each switch, which means you have four power cables to plug into outlets (if you can't use power strips --policy or regulation reasons-- this may exceed your available electrical outlets).
The actual implementation on power (and if you need the power stack cables) is going to highly depend on your situation and the potential future needs of your deployment. For example, if you know that there will be a VoIP rollout next year and you will need more power for PoE phones, you may want to leave the additional power supply slot available to add more power at that time.
answered 9 hours ago
YLearn♦YLearn
24.3k5 gold badges52 silver badges113 bronze badges
24.3k5 gold badges52 silver badges113 bronze badges
Thanks ....thats explains in a very detailed.
– shailendra harinkhede
7 hours ago
add a comment
|
Thanks ....thats explains in a very detailed.
– shailendra harinkhede
7 hours ago
Thanks ....thats explains in a very detailed.
– shailendra harinkhede
7 hours ago
Thanks ....thats explains in a very detailed.
– shailendra harinkhede
7 hours ago
add a comment
|
A stack should be connected in a loop, with a stack cable for each switch. With two switches, that would be two stack cables, three switches three stack cables, etc. that means Switch 1 connects to Switch 2 that connects to Switch 3, etc. (up to a total of nine switches in a data stack), the last switch then connects back to Switch 1. With larger stacks, you may need to buy one longer stack cable.
Connecting the stack in a loop prevents splitting the stack when a switch or link fails. Not using a loop will create two separate stacks where each thinks it is the original stack.
The power stack works the same way, but there is a limitation of four switches for the power stack, so that more than four switches could be in a data stack, but you would have more than one power stack in the data stack. You also need to take into account the power used for the power stack, and the power supplies in each switch. You could get into a situation where you do not have enough power to power the stack, or you could have enough to power the stack in a failure, but not enough power to reboot a switch or the stack (rebooting require more power than running at a steady state).
Thanks for prompt response. I was aware about multiple switches we need to make loop. But i had doubt for two switches.
– shailendra harinkhede
9 hours ago
It doesn't matter how many switches in a stack (as long as it is more than one). You could end up with two separate stacks that each thinks it is the stack. That can happen with two switches if the link between them fails. Each switch would think it is what remains of the original switch stack.
– Ron Maupin♦
9 hours ago
add a comment
|
A stack should be connected in a loop, with a stack cable for each switch. With two switches, that would be two stack cables, three switches three stack cables, etc. that means Switch 1 connects to Switch 2 that connects to Switch 3, etc. (up to a total of nine switches in a data stack), the last switch then connects back to Switch 1. With larger stacks, you may need to buy one longer stack cable.
Connecting the stack in a loop prevents splitting the stack when a switch or link fails. Not using a loop will create two separate stacks where each thinks it is the original stack.
The power stack works the same way, but there is a limitation of four switches for the power stack, so that more than four switches could be in a data stack, but you would have more than one power stack in the data stack. You also need to take into account the power used for the power stack, and the power supplies in each switch. You could get into a situation where you do not have enough power to power the stack, or you could have enough to power the stack in a failure, but not enough power to reboot a switch or the stack (rebooting require more power than running at a steady state).
Thanks for prompt response. I was aware about multiple switches we need to make loop. But i had doubt for two switches.
– shailendra harinkhede
9 hours ago
It doesn't matter how many switches in a stack (as long as it is more than one). You could end up with two separate stacks that each thinks it is the stack. That can happen with two switches if the link between them fails. Each switch would think it is what remains of the original switch stack.
– Ron Maupin♦
9 hours ago
add a comment
|
A stack should be connected in a loop, with a stack cable for each switch. With two switches, that would be two stack cables, three switches three stack cables, etc. that means Switch 1 connects to Switch 2 that connects to Switch 3, etc. (up to a total of nine switches in a data stack), the last switch then connects back to Switch 1. With larger stacks, you may need to buy one longer stack cable.
Connecting the stack in a loop prevents splitting the stack when a switch or link fails. Not using a loop will create two separate stacks where each thinks it is the original stack.
The power stack works the same way, but there is a limitation of four switches for the power stack, so that more than four switches could be in a data stack, but you would have more than one power stack in the data stack. You also need to take into account the power used for the power stack, and the power supplies in each switch. You could get into a situation where you do not have enough power to power the stack, or you could have enough to power the stack in a failure, but not enough power to reboot a switch or the stack (rebooting require more power than running at a steady state).
A stack should be connected in a loop, with a stack cable for each switch. With two switches, that would be two stack cables, three switches three stack cables, etc. that means Switch 1 connects to Switch 2 that connects to Switch 3, etc. (up to a total of nine switches in a data stack), the last switch then connects back to Switch 1. With larger stacks, you may need to buy one longer stack cable.
Connecting the stack in a loop prevents splitting the stack when a switch or link fails. Not using a loop will create two separate stacks where each thinks it is the original stack.
The power stack works the same way, but there is a limitation of four switches for the power stack, so that more than four switches could be in a data stack, but you would have more than one power stack in the data stack. You also need to take into account the power used for the power stack, and the power supplies in each switch. You could get into a situation where you do not have enough power to power the stack, or you could have enough to power the stack in a failure, but not enough power to reboot a switch or the stack (rebooting require more power than running at a steady state).
answered 9 hours ago
Ron Maupin♦Ron Maupin
73.2k14 gold badges75 silver badges136 bronze badges
73.2k14 gold badges75 silver badges136 bronze badges
Thanks for prompt response. I was aware about multiple switches we need to make loop. But i had doubt for two switches.
– shailendra harinkhede
9 hours ago
It doesn't matter how many switches in a stack (as long as it is more than one). You could end up with two separate stacks that each thinks it is the stack. That can happen with two switches if the link between them fails. Each switch would think it is what remains of the original switch stack.
– Ron Maupin♦
9 hours ago
add a comment
|
Thanks for prompt response. I was aware about multiple switches we need to make loop. But i had doubt for two switches.
– shailendra harinkhede
9 hours ago
It doesn't matter how many switches in a stack (as long as it is more than one). You could end up with two separate stacks that each thinks it is the stack. That can happen with two switches if the link between them fails. Each switch would think it is what remains of the original switch stack.
– Ron Maupin♦
9 hours ago
Thanks for prompt response. I was aware about multiple switches we need to make loop. But i had doubt for two switches.
– shailendra harinkhede
9 hours ago
Thanks for prompt response. I was aware about multiple switches we need to make loop. But i had doubt for two switches.
– shailendra harinkhede
9 hours ago
It doesn't matter how many switches in a stack (as long as it is more than one). You could end up with two separate stacks that each thinks it is the stack. That can happen with two switches if the link between them fails. Each switch would think it is what remains of the original switch stack.
– Ron Maupin♦
9 hours ago
It doesn't matter how many switches in a stack (as long as it is more than one). You could end up with two separate stacks that each thinks it is the stack. That can happen with two switches if the link between them fails. Each switch would think it is what remains of the original switch stack.
– Ron Maupin♦
9 hours ago
add a comment
|
Thanks for contributing an answer to Network Engineering Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fnetworkengineering.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f62651%2fhow-many-stack-cables-would-be-needed-if-we-want-to-stack-two-3850-switches%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown