LM317 to step voltage upResistors values to use with LM317Simple LM317 variable voltage supply, does it limit...

How to use multiple criteria for -find

What is the most likely cause of short, quick, and useless reviews?

Which is the best password hashing algorithm in .NET Core?

I have two helper functions that are the exact same, one executes and one doesn't. How come?

Solve this icositetragram

Visiting girlfriend in the USA

Using font to highlight a god's speech in dialogue

What is this red bug infesting some trees in southern Germany?

How did Gollum know Sauron was gathering the Haradrim to make war?

Do we know the problems the University of Manchester's Transistor Computer was intended to solve?

How does Harry wear the invisibility cloak?

How do I stop making people jump at home and at work?

Can my UK debt be collected because I have to return to US?

What is a "fat pointer" in Rust?

FHE: What is the difference between multiplicative depth and multiplicative level?

How do we know if a dialogue sounds unnatural without asking for feedback?

Can there be plants on the dark side of a tidally locked world?

Does the Scrying spell require you to have a clear path to the target in order to work?

Ideal characterization of almost convergence

Do index funds really have double-digit percents annual return rates?

Plotting level sets of the form f(x,y,c)==0

What is the converted mana cost of land cards?

Declaring 2 (or even multi-) dimensional std::arrays elegantly

In Toy Story, are toys the only inanimate objects that become alive? And if so, why?



LM317 to step voltage up


Resistors values to use with LM317Simple LM317 variable voltage supply, does it limit current too?Why are the output voltages way too high on this stacked LM317 circuit?LM317 Voltage Regulator + ammeter = firecracker?LM317 µA Constant Current source possibility?How to improve load transient response of an LM317 voltage-regulator powering an audio amplifier?LM317 Maida Style regulatorLM317 maximum resistor/pot - Current regulator - Reference voltageLM317 - Input Voltage






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}







1












$begingroup$


I am sorry for questioning the "law of conservation of energy" first of all.



The expression for the output voltage of the LM317:



Vout=1.25*(1+R2/R1)



contains no any relation to the input voltage. It doesn't care what's the input voltage. It only cares about the two resistors R1 and R2 (in my simulation). Increasing the value of R2 increased the output. But once I get the output equal to the input, further increasing the value of R2 doesn't increase the output voltage. What is the factor that doesn't let the output voltage go beyond the input voltage. I know it won't go (law of conservation of energy) but why?



I have attached the snippets of the output voltage for two different values for the R2 resistors.(I don't know whether those large valued resistors are available. Please bear with me for this simulation)
When R2=1000 Tohmswhen R2=1000 Gohms



Edit: So its all the matter of 'Minimum Dropout voltage' (Vin-Vout). But going through this datasheet shows the difference of -0.3 which indicates higher output voltage.










share|improve this question











$endgroup$










  • 2




    $begingroup$
    No, the -0.3V for the OnSemi part is not the recommended dropout voltage. That number is in the "Maximum Ratings" section and they are saying that if you ever allow the input voltage to be more than 0.3V below the output voltage then the device may be permanently damaged.
    $endgroup$
    – Elliot Alderson
    9 hours ago


















1












$begingroup$


I am sorry for questioning the "law of conservation of energy" first of all.



The expression for the output voltage of the LM317:



Vout=1.25*(1+R2/R1)



contains no any relation to the input voltage. It doesn't care what's the input voltage. It only cares about the two resistors R1 and R2 (in my simulation). Increasing the value of R2 increased the output. But once I get the output equal to the input, further increasing the value of R2 doesn't increase the output voltage. What is the factor that doesn't let the output voltage go beyond the input voltage. I know it won't go (law of conservation of energy) but why?



I have attached the snippets of the output voltage for two different values for the R2 resistors.(I don't know whether those large valued resistors are available. Please bear with me for this simulation)
When R2=1000 Tohmswhen R2=1000 Gohms



Edit: So its all the matter of 'Minimum Dropout voltage' (Vin-Vout). But going through this datasheet shows the difference of -0.3 which indicates higher output voltage.










share|improve this question











$endgroup$










  • 2




    $begingroup$
    No, the -0.3V for the OnSemi part is not the recommended dropout voltage. That number is in the "Maximum Ratings" section and they are saying that if you ever allow the input voltage to be more than 0.3V below the output voltage then the device may be permanently damaged.
    $endgroup$
    – Elliot Alderson
    9 hours ago














1












1








1





$begingroup$


I am sorry for questioning the "law of conservation of energy" first of all.



The expression for the output voltage of the LM317:



Vout=1.25*(1+R2/R1)



contains no any relation to the input voltage. It doesn't care what's the input voltage. It only cares about the two resistors R1 and R2 (in my simulation). Increasing the value of R2 increased the output. But once I get the output equal to the input, further increasing the value of R2 doesn't increase the output voltage. What is the factor that doesn't let the output voltage go beyond the input voltage. I know it won't go (law of conservation of energy) but why?



I have attached the snippets of the output voltage for two different values for the R2 resistors.(I don't know whether those large valued resistors are available. Please bear with me for this simulation)
When R2=1000 Tohmswhen R2=1000 Gohms



Edit: So its all the matter of 'Minimum Dropout voltage' (Vin-Vout). But going through this datasheet shows the difference of -0.3 which indicates higher output voltage.










share|improve this question











$endgroup$




I am sorry for questioning the "law of conservation of energy" first of all.



The expression for the output voltage of the LM317:



Vout=1.25*(1+R2/R1)



contains no any relation to the input voltage. It doesn't care what's the input voltage. It only cares about the two resistors R1 and R2 (in my simulation). Increasing the value of R2 increased the output. But once I get the output equal to the input, further increasing the value of R2 doesn't increase the output voltage. What is the factor that doesn't let the output voltage go beyond the input voltage. I know it won't go (law of conservation of energy) but why?



I have attached the snippets of the output voltage for two different values for the R2 resistors.(I don't know whether those large valued resistors are available. Please bear with me for this simulation)
When R2=1000 Tohmswhen R2=1000 Gohms



Edit: So its all the matter of 'Minimum Dropout voltage' (Vin-Vout). But going through this datasheet shows the difference of -0.3 which indicates higher output voltage.







voltage-regulator lm317






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 9 hours ago







JuneStar_2918

















asked 9 hours ago









JuneStar_2918JuneStar_2918

4002 silver badges11 bronze badges




4002 silver badges11 bronze badges











  • 2




    $begingroup$
    No, the -0.3V for the OnSemi part is not the recommended dropout voltage. That number is in the "Maximum Ratings" section and they are saying that if you ever allow the input voltage to be more than 0.3V below the output voltage then the device may be permanently damaged.
    $endgroup$
    – Elliot Alderson
    9 hours ago














  • 2




    $begingroup$
    No, the -0.3V for the OnSemi part is not the recommended dropout voltage. That number is in the "Maximum Ratings" section and they are saying that if you ever allow the input voltage to be more than 0.3V below the output voltage then the device may be permanently damaged.
    $endgroup$
    – Elliot Alderson
    9 hours ago








2




2




$begingroup$
No, the -0.3V for the OnSemi part is not the recommended dropout voltage. That number is in the "Maximum Ratings" section and they are saying that if you ever allow the input voltage to be more than 0.3V below the output voltage then the device may be permanently damaged.
$endgroup$
– Elliot Alderson
9 hours ago




$begingroup$
No, the -0.3V for the OnSemi part is not the recommended dropout voltage. That number is in the "Maximum Ratings" section and they are saying that if you ever allow the input voltage to be more than 0.3V below the output voltage then the device may be permanently damaged.
$endgroup$
– Elliot Alderson
9 hours ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















2













$begingroup$

All the LM317 can possibly do is act like a (controlled) variable resistor between the input and output, it cannot create energy out of thin air.



And it can't even do that, being a bipolar part it will have some significant voltage drop at best with even moderate currents (some CMOS-output LDO regulators have a few mV dropout at low currents such as a few mA).



In the case of the LM317 (which is not an LDO = Low Drop Out) part, there is a Darlington transistor pair between input and output, and the drive can't go all the way to the input voltage.



See this "representative" schematic from this datasheet:



enter image description here



In general you should have 3V or more between input and output, as specified under the "line regulation" parameter in the datasheet.



enter image description here






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$











  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Ahh! I can see why there is this limitation. And I think the datasheet I have attached is wrong I guess. Thank you @Spehro Pefhany Sir.
    $endgroup$
    – JuneStar_2918
    9 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @JuneStar_2918 No, that data sheet is not wrong. Rather you are mistaken in only looking at the formula and ignoring the conditions the data sheet gives which bound when the formula is applicable. There may also be very slight difference between brands, both in the actual details and especially in how they are presented. Reading data sheets is a skill, generally when a manufacturer wants to provide something more tutorial in nature they create an Application Note or Reference Design, sometimes for novel parts there would be hints in a data sheet but not for something common like this.
    $endgroup$
    – Chris Stratton
    8 hours ago





















2













$begingroup$

An LM317 is defined by many parameters, not just the equation you provide. All of the required operating conditions must be satisfied, and one of the those is the "minimum dropout voltage". This is the minimum difference between the input and output voltage, where the input voltage must be greater than the output voltage. The datasheet for your specific LM317 will provide that number.



Edit: For the Texas Instrument's version of the LM317, the important parameter is in section 6.3 of the datasheet.



enter image description here






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$















  • $begingroup$
    I have edited my question based on you answer. Thank you.
    $endgroup$
    – JuneStar_2918
    9 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Why does it say recommended? Is it saying "if you need 40V at its output, then you must supply 43-80V at its input"?
    $endgroup$
    – JuneStar_2918
    9 hours ago














Your Answer






StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("schematics", function () {
StackExchange.schematics.init();
});
}, "cicuitlab");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "135"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2felectronics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f455846%2flm317-to-step-voltage-up%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes








2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









2













$begingroup$

All the LM317 can possibly do is act like a (controlled) variable resistor between the input and output, it cannot create energy out of thin air.



And it can't even do that, being a bipolar part it will have some significant voltage drop at best with even moderate currents (some CMOS-output LDO regulators have a few mV dropout at low currents such as a few mA).



In the case of the LM317 (which is not an LDO = Low Drop Out) part, there is a Darlington transistor pair between input and output, and the drive can't go all the way to the input voltage.



See this "representative" schematic from this datasheet:



enter image description here



In general you should have 3V or more between input and output, as specified under the "line regulation" parameter in the datasheet.



enter image description here






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$











  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Ahh! I can see why there is this limitation. And I think the datasheet I have attached is wrong I guess. Thank you @Spehro Pefhany Sir.
    $endgroup$
    – JuneStar_2918
    9 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @JuneStar_2918 No, that data sheet is not wrong. Rather you are mistaken in only looking at the formula and ignoring the conditions the data sheet gives which bound when the formula is applicable. There may also be very slight difference between brands, both in the actual details and especially in how they are presented. Reading data sheets is a skill, generally when a manufacturer wants to provide something more tutorial in nature they create an Application Note or Reference Design, sometimes for novel parts there would be hints in a data sheet but not for something common like this.
    $endgroup$
    – Chris Stratton
    8 hours ago


















2













$begingroup$

All the LM317 can possibly do is act like a (controlled) variable resistor between the input and output, it cannot create energy out of thin air.



And it can't even do that, being a bipolar part it will have some significant voltage drop at best with even moderate currents (some CMOS-output LDO regulators have a few mV dropout at low currents such as a few mA).



In the case of the LM317 (which is not an LDO = Low Drop Out) part, there is a Darlington transistor pair between input and output, and the drive can't go all the way to the input voltage.



See this "representative" schematic from this datasheet:



enter image description here



In general you should have 3V or more between input and output, as specified under the "line regulation" parameter in the datasheet.



enter image description here






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$











  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Ahh! I can see why there is this limitation. And I think the datasheet I have attached is wrong I guess. Thank you @Spehro Pefhany Sir.
    $endgroup$
    – JuneStar_2918
    9 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @JuneStar_2918 No, that data sheet is not wrong. Rather you are mistaken in only looking at the formula and ignoring the conditions the data sheet gives which bound when the formula is applicable. There may also be very slight difference between brands, both in the actual details and especially in how they are presented. Reading data sheets is a skill, generally when a manufacturer wants to provide something more tutorial in nature they create an Application Note or Reference Design, sometimes for novel parts there would be hints in a data sheet but not for something common like this.
    $endgroup$
    – Chris Stratton
    8 hours ago
















2














2










2







$begingroup$

All the LM317 can possibly do is act like a (controlled) variable resistor between the input and output, it cannot create energy out of thin air.



And it can't even do that, being a bipolar part it will have some significant voltage drop at best with even moderate currents (some CMOS-output LDO regulators have a few mV dropout at low currents such as a few mA).



In the case of the LM317 (which is not an LDO = Low Drop Out) part, there is a Darlington transistor pair between input and output, and the drive can't go all the way to the input voltage.



See this "representative" schematic from this datasheet:



enter image description here



In general you should have 3V or more between input and output, as specified under the "line regulation" parameter in the datasheet.



enter image description here






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$



All the LM317 can possibly do is act like a (controlled) variable resistor between the input and output, it cannot create energy out of thin air.



And it can't even do that, being a bipolar part it will have some significant voltage drop at best with even moderate currents (some CMOS-output LDO regulators have a few mV dropout at low currents such as a few mA).



In the case of the LM317 (which is not an LDO = Low Drop Out) part, there is a Darlington transistor pair between input and output, and the drive can't go all the way to the input voltage.



See this "representative" schematic from this datasheet:



enter image description here



In general you should have 3V or more between input and output, as specified under the "line regulation" parameter in the datasheet.



enter image description here







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited 9 hours ago

























answered 9 hours ago









Spehro PefhanySpehro Pefhany

223k5 gold badges177 silver badges467 bronze badges




223k5 gold badges177 silver badges467 bronze badges











  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Ahh! I can see why there is this limitation. And I think the datasheet I have attached is wrong I guess. Thank you @Spehro Pefhany Sir.
    $endgroup$
    – JuneStar_2918
    9 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @JuneStar_2918 No, that data sheet is not wrong. Rather you are mistaken in only looking at the formula and ignoring the conditions the data sheet gives which bound when the formula is applicable. There may also be very slight difference between brands, both in the actual details and especially in how they are presented. Reading data sheets is a skill, generally when a manufacturer wants to provide something more tutorial in nature they create an Application Note or Reference Design, sometimes for novel parts there would be hints in a data sheet but not for something common like this.
    $endgroup$
    – Chris Stratton
    8 hours ago
















  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Ahh! I can see why there is this limitation. And I think the datasheet I have attached is wrong I guess. Thank you @Spehro Pefhany Sir.
    $endgroup$
    – JuneStar_2918
    9 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @JuneStar_2918 No, that data sheet is not wrong. Rather you are mistaken in only looking at the formula and ignoring the conditions the data sheet gives which bound when the formula is applicable. There may also be very slight difference between brands, both in the actual details and especially in how they are presented. Reading data sheets is a skill, generally when a manufacturer wants to provide something more tutorial in nature they create an Application Note or Reference Design, sometimes for novel parts there would be hints in a data sheet but not for something common like this.
    $endgroup$
    – Chris Stratton
    8 hours ago










1




1




$begingroup$
Ahh! I can see why there is this limitation. And I think the datasheet I have attached is wrong I guess. Thank you @Spehro Pefhany Sir.
$endgroup$
– JuneStar_2918
9 hours ago




$begingroup$
Ahh! I can see why there is this limitation. And I think the datasheet I have attached is wrong I guess. Thank you @Spehro Pefhany Sir.
$endgroup$
– JuneStar_2918
9 hours ago












$begingroup$
@JuneStar_2918 No, that data sheet is not wrong. Rather you are mistaken in only looking at the formula and ignoring the conditions the data sheet gives which bound when the formula is applicable. There may also be very slight difference between brands, both in the actual details and especially in how they are presented. Reading data sheets is a skill, generally when a manufacturer wants to provide something more tutorial in nature they create an Application Note or Reference Design, sometimes for novel parts there would be hints in a data sheet but not for something common like this.
$endgroup$
– Chris Stratton
8 hours ago






$begingroup$
@JuneStar_2918 No, that data sheet is not wrong. Rather you are mistaken in only looking at the formula and ignoring the conditions the data sheet gives which bound when the formula is applicable. There may also be very slight difference between brands, both in the actual details and especially in how they are presented. Reading data sheets is a skill, generally when a manufacturer wants to provide something more tutorial in nature they create an Application Note or Reference Design, sometimes for novel parts there would be hints in a data sheet but not for something common like this.
$endgroup$
– Chris Stratton
8 hours ago















2













$begingroup$

An LM317 is defined by many parameters, not just the equation you provide. All of the required operating conditions must be satisfied, and one of the those is the "minimum dropout voltage". This is the minimum difference between the input and output voltage, where the input voltage must be greater than the output voltage. The datasheet for your specific LM317 will provide that number.



Edit: For the Texas Instrument's version of the LM317, the important parameter is in section 6.3 of the datasheet.



enter image description here






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$















  • $begingroup$
    I have edited my question based on you answer. Thank you.
    $endgroup$
    – JuneStar_2918
    9 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Why does it say recommended? Is it saying "if you need 40V at its output, then you must supply 43-80V at its input"?
    $endgroup$
    – JuneStar_2918
    9 hours ago
















2













$begingroup$

An LM317 is defined by many parameters, not just the equation you provide. All of the required operating conditions must be satisfied, and one of the those is the "minimum dropout voltage". This is the minimum difference between the input and output voltage, where the input voltage must be greater than the output voltage. The datasheet for your specific LM317 will provide that number.



Edit: For the Texas Instrument's version of the LM317, the important parameter is in section 6.3 of the datasheet.



enter image description here






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$















  • $begingroup$
    I have edited my question based on you answer. Thank you.
    $endgroup$
    – JuneStar_2918
    9 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Why does it say recommended? Is it saying "if you need 40V at its output, then you must supply 43-80V at its input"?
    $endgroup$
    – JuneStar_2918
    9 hours ago














2














2










2







$begingroup$

An LM317 is defined by many parameters, not just the equation you provide. All of the required operating conditions must be satisfied, and one of the those is the "minimum dropout voltage". This is the minimum difference between the input and output voltage, where the input voltage must be greater than the output voltage. The datasheet for your specific LM317 will provide that number.



Edit: For the Texas Instrument's version of the LM317, the important parameter is in section 6.3 of the datasheet.



enter image description here






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$



An LM317 is defined by many parameters, not just the equation you provide. All of the required operating conditions must be satisfied, and one of the those is the "minimum dropout voltage". This is the minimum difference between the input and output voltage, where the input voltage must be greater than the output voltage. The datasheet for your specific LM317 will provide that number.



Edit: For the Texas Instrument's version of the LM317, the important parameter is in section 6.3 of the datasheet.



enter image description here







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited 9 hours ago

























answered 9 hours ago









Elliot AldersonElliot Alderson

11.9k2 gold badges12 silver badges25 bronze badges




11.9k2 gold badges12 silver badges25 bronze badges















  • $begingroup$
    I have edited my question based on you answer. Thank you.
    $endgroup$
    – JuneStar_2918
    9 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Why does it say recommended? Is it saying "if you need 40V at its output, then you must supply 43-80V at its input"?
    $endgroup$
    – JuneStar_2918
    9 hours ago


















  • $begingroup$
    I have edited my question based on you answer. Thank you.
    $endgroup$
    – JuneStar_2918
    9 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Why does it say recommended? Is it saying "if you need 40V at its output, then you must supply 43-80V at its input"?
    $endgroup$
    – JuneStar_2918
    9 hours ago
















$begingroup$
I have edited my question based on you answer. Thank you.
$endgroup$
– JuneStar_2918
9 hours ago




$begingroup$
I have edited my question based on you answer. Thank you.
$endgroup$
– JuneStar_2918
9 hours ago












$begingroup$
Why does it say recommended? Is it saying "if you need 40V at its output, then you must supply 43-80V at its input"?
$endgroup$
– JuneStar_2918
9 hours ago




$begingroup$
Why does it say recommended? Is it saying "if you need 40V at its output, then you must supply 43-80V at its input"?
$endgroup$
– JuneStar_2918
9 hours ago


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Electrical Engineering Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2felectronics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f455846%2flm317-to-step-voltage-up%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Hudson River Historic District Contents Geography History The district today Aesthetics Cultural...

The number designs the writing. Feandra Aversely Definition: The act of ingrafting a sprig or shoot of one...

Ayherre Geografie Demografie Externe links Navigatiemenu43° 23′ NB, 1° 15′ WL43° 23′ NB, 1°...