Why do things cool down?How to vizualize a heat pump microscopically?Heat transfer by conduction is not...
Applications of mathematics in clinical setting
Account creation and log-in system
Why are there no programmes / playbills for movies?
When would open interest equal trading volume?
What are the end bytes of *.docx file format
What do you call the battery slot's ends?
Why do things cool down?
How can I create folders in folders in terminal
What's the word for a student who doesn't register but goes to a class anyway?
merging certain list elements
Strength of Female Chimpanzees vs. Male Chimpanzees?
As an employer, can I compel my employees to vote?
How could artificial intelligence harm us?
Carroll's interpretation of 1-forms
All numbers in a 5x5 Minesweeper grid
What's the purpose of autocorrelation?
What exactly is a web font, and what does converting to one involve?
Which block cipher parameters should be kept secret?
Talk about Grandpa's weird talk: Who are these folks?
What the did the controller say during my approach to land (audio clip)?
How long to get a new passport in the US?
Minimize taxes now that I earn a living wage
Minimum number of lines to draw 111 squares
Why would a fighter use the afterburner and air brakes at the same time?
Why do things cool down?
How to vizualize a heat pump microscopically?Heat transfer by conduction is not possible for gases?How does cold air move through a roomDoes extreme cold make **everything** extremely brittle?If an object falls - regarding air resistance - does the Potential or Kinetic energy get converted into thermal energy as it is falling?Chardonnay, air versus waterValidity of Carnot's theorem when operating between finite reservoirsWhy don't you get burned by the wood benches in a sauna?Why do cool things warm up slower than hot things cool down?If the first law of thermodynamics ensures conservation of energy, why does it allow systems to lose energy?
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}
$begingroup$
What I've heard from books and other materials is that heat is nothing but the sum of the movement of molecules. So, as you all know, one common myth breaker was "Unlike in movies, you don't get frozen right away when you get thrown into space".
But the thing that bugs me is that things in the universe eventually cool down. How is that possible when there are no other things around to which the molecules can transfer their heat?
thermodynamics energy-conservation temperature equilibrium
$endgroup$
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
What I've heard from books and other materials is that heat is nothing but the sum of the movement of molecules. So, as you all know, one common myth breaker was "Unlike in movies, you don't get frozen right away when you get thrown into space".
But the thing that bugs me is that things in the universe eventually cool down. How is that possible when there are no other things around to which the molecules can transfer their heat?
thermodynamics energy-conservation temperature equilibrium
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Molecules can give off electromagnetic radiation; their energy is transferred to the E.M. field itself. Eventually energy becomes evenly distributed, meaning that there can be no net gain or loss of energy. When that happens, objects will not cool off; entropy is maximised.
$endgroup$
– user234461
14 hours ago
3
$begingroup$
The term you're looking for is Black-body radiation. Any object above 0K radiates heat away.
$endgroup$
– Tomáš Zato
12 hours ago
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
What I've heard from books and other materials is that heat is nothing but the sum of the movement of molecules. So, as you all know, one common myth breaker was "Unlike in movies, you don't get frozen right away when you get thrown into space".
But the thing that bugs me is that things in the universe eventually cool down. How is that possible when there are no other things around to which the molecules can transfer their heat?
thermodynamics energy-conservation temperature equilibrium
$endgroup$
What I've heard from books and other materials is that heat is nothing but the sum of the movement of molecules. So, as you all know, one common myth breaker was "Unlike in movies, you don't get frozen right away when you get thrown into space".
But the thing that bugs me is that things in the universe eventually cool down. How is that possible when there are no other things around to which the molecules can transfer their heat?
thermodynamics energy-conservation temperature equilibrium
thermodynamics energy-conservation temperature equilibrium
edited 1 hour ago
CJ Dennis
4754 silver badges13 bronze badges
4754 silver badges13 bronze badges
asked yesterday
dolcodolco
1681 silver badge6 bronze badges
1681 silver badge6 bronze badges
1
$begingroup$
Molecules can give off electromagnetic radiation; their energy is transferred to the E.M. field itself. Eventually energy becomes evenly distributed, meaning that there can be no net gain or loss of energy. When that happens, objects will not cool off; entropy is maximised.
$endgroup$
– user234461
14 hours ago
3
$begingroup$
The term you're looking for is Black-body radiation. Any object above 0K radiates heat away.
$endgroup$
– Tomáš Zato
12 hours ago
add a comment
|
1
$begingroup$
Molecules can give off electromagnetic radiation; their energy is transferred to the E.M. field itself. Eventually energy becomes evenly distributed, meaning that there can be no net gain or loss of energy. When that happens, objects will not cool off; entropy is maximised.
$endgroup$
– user234461
14 hours ago
3
$begingroup$
The term you're looking for is Black-body radiation. Any object above 0K radiates heat away.
$endgroup$
– Tomáš Zato
12 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
Molecules can give off electromagnetic radiation; their energy is transferred to the E.M. field itself. Eventually energy becomes evenly distributed, meaning that there can be no net gain or loss of energy. When that happens, objects will not cool off; entropy is maximised.
$endgroup$
– user234461
14 hours ago
$begingroup$
Molecules can give off electromagnetic radiation; their energy is transferred to the E.M. field itself. Eventually energy becomes evenly distributed, meaning that there can be no net gain or loss of energy. When that happens, objects will not cool off; entropy is maximised.
$endgroup$
– user234461
14 hours ago
3
3
$begingroup$
The term you're looking for is Black-body radiation. Any object above 0K radiates heat away.
$endgroup$
– Tomáš Zato
12 hours ago
$begingroup$
The term you're looking for is Black-body radiation. Any object above 0K radiates heat away.
$endgroup$
– Tomáš Zato
12 hours ago
add a comment
|
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
You exchange heat with the objects around you.
If the objects around you are hotter than you, you'll heat up.
If the objects around you are cooler than you (neglecting the heat you're generating due to metabolic processes), you'll cool off.
In space, the objects around you (mostly interstellar medium) is cooler than you so you radiate more heat away from you into them than they radiate toward you.
If you were thrown out into space, but very near a star, you might receive more heat from the star more than you could radiate away into space, and you would heat up rather than cooling down.
But the thing which bugs me is that things in the Universe, eventually cool off, and how is that possible, when there's no other things around, to which the molecules transfer their heat?
There are three main heat transfer mechanisms.
conduction is transfer by direct contact between two bodies, or through a body with a temperature gradient across it.
convection is transfer by the flow of a fluid (liquid or gas).
radiation is transfer by the exchange of electromagnetic radiation.
Heat transfer by radiation doesn't require any physical contact between two bodies or any material medium surrounding a body. Radiation is the main heat transfer mechanism for a body floating in space.
$endgroup$
10
$begingroup$
It should be noted that radiation is much less efficient than the other two, which is why space suits, the Space Shuttle and the ISS need big radiators or other cooling systems. This is a bit counter-intuitive given that "everybody knows" space is cold. The reason is that space is also very empty, so there is nothing to conduct to or convect with.
$endgroup$
– Jörg W Mittag
16 hours ago
5
$begingroup$
@JörgWMittag AFAIK the space suits aren't even big enough for that - they use disposable coolant, and when you run out (or the fans break down), you die of heatstroke in short order.
$endgroup$
– Luaan
15 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@JörgWMittag: What do you mean exactly, "radiation is much less efficient than the other two"? It depends on temperature levels and what's between the two bodies. I hear convection and conduction aren't very efficient to transfer thermal energy between the Sun and Earth.
$endgroup$
– Eric Duminil
13 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@JörgWMittag very well put and a great real world example is water vs. air and the human body. It's relatively comfortable to get out in 72F/22C air but to get into water of that temperature is extremely cold!
$endgroup$
– jwh20
13 hours ago
3
$begingroup$
Most importantly for the question, if there's no object around you, your body radiates infrared anyway, not caring if the radiation will land on the Earth, the Moon, Alpha Centauri or nothing at all.
$endgroup$
– Eric Duminil
13 hours ago
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
Everything that is not 0 Kelvin radiates electromagnetic energy. In vacuum, this is the only relevant form of heat transfer. The hotter you are, the more you energy you radiate (I believe the relevant equation is given here).
So, the question whether you cool off or heat up in space depends on whether you absorbs more electromagnetic radiation than you give away. So, for instance, if you are orbiting Earth in plain sunlight, you may actually warm up, because there is lot of electromagnetic energy coming from the sun (much of it as visible light).
But if you are in the shadow of the Earth, the amount of energy that comes from night side of Earth and the general direction of the outer space is very low compared the the amount of energy you radiate away at 37ºC, so you cool off and eventually freeze.
$endgroup$
add a comment
|
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "151"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/"u003ecc by-sa 4.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphysics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f503023%2fwhy-do-things-cool-down%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
You exchange heat with the objects around you.
If the objects around you are hotter than you, you'll heat up.
If the objects around you are cooler than you (neglecting the heat you're generating due to metabolic processes), you'll cool off.
In space, the objects around you (mostly interstellar medium) is cooler than you so you radiate more heat away from you into them than they radiate toward you.
If you were thrown out into space, but very near a star, you might receive more heat from the star more than you could radiate away into space, and you would heat up rather than cooling down.
But the thing which bugs me is that things in the Universe, eventually cool off, and how is that possible, when there's no other things around, to which the molecules transfer their heat?
There are three main heat transfer mechanisms.
conduction is transfer by direct contact between two bodies, or through a body with a temperature gradient across it.
convection is transfer by the flow of a fluid (liquid or gas).
radiation is transfer by the exchange of electromagnetic radiation.
Heat transfer by radiation doesn't require any physical contact between two bodies or any material medium surrounding a body. Radiation is the main heat transfer mechanism for a body floating in space.
$endgroup$
10
$begingroup$
It should be noted that radiation is much less efficient than the other two, which is why space suits, the Space Shuttle and the ISS need big radiators or other cooling systems. This is a bit counter-intuitive given that "everybody knows" space is cold. The reason is that space is also very empty, so there is nothing to conduct to or convect with.
$endgroup$
– Jörg W Mittag
16 hours ago
5
$begingroup$
@JörgWMittag AFAIK the space suits aren't even big enough for that - they use disposable coolant, and when you run out (or the fans break down), you die of heatstroke in short order.
$endgroup$
– Luaan
15 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@JörgWMittag: What do you mean exactly, "radiation is much less efficient than the other two"? It depends on temperature levels and what's between the two bodies. I hear convection and conduction aren't very efficient to transfer thermal energy between the Sun and Earth.
$endgroup$
– Eric Duminil
13 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@JörgWMittag very well put and a great real world example is water vs. air and the human body. It's relatively comfortable to get out in 72F/22C air but to get into water of that temperature is extremely cold!
$endgroup$
– jwh20
13 hours ago
3
$begingroup$
Most importantly for the question, if there's no object around you, your body radiates infrared anyway, not caring if the radiation will land on the Earth, the Moon, Alpha Centauri or nothing at all.
$endgroup$
– Eric Duminil
13 hours ago
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
You exchange heat with the objects around you.
If the objects around you are hotter than you, you'll heat up.
If the objects around you are cooler than you (neglecting the heat you're generating due to metabolic processes), you'll cool off.
In space, the objects around you (mostly interstellar medium) is cooler than you so you radiate more heat away from you into them than they radiate toward you.
If you were thrown out into space, but very near a star, you might receive more heat from the star more than you could radiate away into space, and you would heat up rather than cooling down.
But the thing which bugs me is that things in the Universe, eventually cool off, and how is that possible, when there's no other things around, to which the molecules transfer their heat?
There are three main heat transfer mechanisms.
conduction is transfer by direct contact between two bodies, or through a body with a temperature gradient across it.
convection is transfer by the flow of a fluid (liquid or gas).
radiation is transfer by the exchange of electromagnetic radiation.
Heat transfer by radiation doesn't require any physical contact between two bodies or any material medium surrounding a body. Radiation is the main heat transfer mechanism for a body floating in space.
$endgroup$
10
$begingroup$
It should be noted that radiation is much less efficient than the other two, which is why space suits, the Space Shuttle and the ISS need big radiators or other cooling systems. This is a bit counter-intuitive given that "everybody knows" space is cold. The reason is that space is also very empty, so there is nothing to conduct to or convect with.
$endgroup$
– Jörg W Mittag
16 hours ago
5
$begingroup$
@JörgWMittag AFAIK the space suits aren't even big enough for that - they use disposable coolant, and when you run out (or the fans break down), you die of heatstroke in short order.
$endgroup$
– Luaan
15 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@JörgWMittag: What do you mean exactly, "radiation is much less efficient than the other two"? It depends on temperature levels and what's between the two bodies. I hear convection and conduction aren't very efficient to transfer thermal energy between the Sun and Earth.
$endgroup$
– Eric Duminil
13 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@JörgWMittag very well put and a great real world example is water vs. air and the human body. It's relatively comfortable to get out in 72F/22C air but to get into water of that temperature is extremely cold!
$endgroup$
– jwh20
13 hours ago
3
$begingroup$
Most importantly for the question, if there's no object around you, your body radiates infrared anyway, not caring if the radiation will land on the Earth, the Moon, Alpha Centauri or nothing at all.
$endgroup$
– Eric Duminil
13 hours ago
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
You exchange heat with the objects around you.
If the objects around you are hotter than you, you'll heat up.
If the objects around you are cooler than you (neglecting the heat you're generating due to metabolic processes), you'll cool off.
In space, the objects around you (mostly interstellar medium) is cooler than you so you radiate more heat away from you into them than they radiate toward you.
If you were thrown out into space, but very near a star, you might receive more heat from the star more than you could radiate away into space, and you would heat up rather than cooling down.
But the thing which bugs me is that things in the Universe, eventually cool off, and how is that possible, when there's no other things around, to which the molecules transfer their heat?
There are three main heat transfer mechanisms.
conduction is transfer by direct contact between two bodies, or through a body with a temperature gradient across it.
convection is transfer by the flow of a fluid (liquid or gas).
radiation is transfer by the exchange of electromagnetic radiation.
Heat transfer by radiation doesn't require any physical contact between two bodies or any material medium surrounding a body. Radiation is the main heat transfer mechanism for a body floating in space.
$endgroup$
You exchange heat with the objects around you.
If the objects around you are hotter than you, you'll heat up.
If the objects around you are cooler than you (neglecting the heat you're generating due to metabolic processes), you'll cool off.
In space, the objects around you (mostly interstellar medium) is cooler than you so you radiate more heat away from you into them than they radiate toward you.
If you were thrown out into space, but very near a star, you might receive more heat from the star more than you could radiate away into space, and you would heat up rather than cooling down.
But the thing which bugs me is that things in the Universe, eventually cool off, and how is that possible, when there's no other things around, to which the molecules transfer their heat?
There are three main heat transfer mechanisms.
conduction is transfer by direct contact between two bodies, or through a body with a temperature gradient across it.
convection is transfer by the flow of a fluid (liquid or gas).
radiation is transfer by the exchange of electromagnetic radiation.
Heat transfer by radiation doesn't require any physical contact between two bodies or any material medium surrounding a body. Radiation is the main heat transfer mechanism for a body floating in space.
edited yesterday
answered yesterday
The PhotonThe Photon
11.9k1 gold badge23 silver badges40 bronze badges
11.9k1 gold badge23 silver badges40 bronze badges
10
$begingroup$
It should be noted that radiation is much less efficient than the other two, which is why space suits, the Space Shuttle and the ISS need big radiators or other cooling systems. This is a bit counter-intuitive given that "everybody knows" space is cold. The reason is that space is also very empty, so there is nothing to conduct to or convect with.
$endgroup$
– Jörg W Mittag
16 hours ago
5
$begingroup$
@JörgWMittag AFAIK the space suits aren't even big enough for that - they use disposable coolant, and when you run out (or the fans break down), you die of heatstroke in short order.
$endgroup$
– Luaan
15 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@JörgWMittag: What do you mean exactly, "radiation is much less efficient than the other two"? It depends on temperature levels and what's between the two bodies. I hear convection and conduction aren't very efficient to transfer thermal energy between the Sun and Earth.
$endgroup$
– Eric Duminil
13 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@JörgWMittag very well put and a great real world example is water vs. air and the human body. It's relatively comfortable to get out in 72F/22C air but to get into water of that temperature is extremely cold!
$endgroup$
– jwh20
13 hours ago
3
$begingroup$
Most importantly for the question, if there's no object around you, your body radiates infrared anyway, not caring if the radiation will land on the Earth, the Moon, Alpha Centauri or nothing at all.
$endgroup$
– Eric Duminil
13 hours ago
|
show 1 more comment
10
$begingroup$
It should be noted that radiation is much less efficient than the other two, which is why space suits, the Space Shuttle and the ISS need big radiators or other cooling systems. This is a bit counter-intuitive given that "everybody knows" space is cold. The reason is that space is also very empty, so there is nothing to conduct to or convect with.
$endgroup$
– Jörg W Mittag
16 hours ago
5
$begingroup$
@JörgWMittag AFAIK the space suits aren't even big enough for that - they use disposable coolant, and when you run out (or the fans break down), you die of heatstroke in short order.
$endgroup$
– Luaan
15 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@JörgWMittag: What do you mean exactly, "radiation is much less efficient than the other two"? It depends on temperature levels and what's between the two bodies. I hear convection and conduction aren't very efficient to transfer thermal energy between the Sun and Earth.
$endgroup$
– Eric Duminil
13 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@JörgWMittag very well put and a great real world example is water vs. air and the human body. It's relatively comfortable to get out in 72F/22C air but to get into water of that temperature is extremely cold!
$endgroup$
– jwh20
13 hours ago
3
$begingroup$
Most importantly for the question, if there's no object around you, your body radiates infrared anyway, not caring if the radiation will land on the Earth, the Moon, Alpha Centauri or nothing at all.
$endgroup$
– Eric Duminil
13 hours ago
10
10
$begingroup$
It should be noted that radiation is much less efficient than the other two, which is why space suits, the Space Shuttle and the ISS need big radiators or other cooling systems. This is a bit counter-intuitive given that "everybody knows" space is cold. The reason is that space is also very empty, so there is nothing to conduct to or convect with.
$endgroup$
– Jörg W Mittag
16 hours ago
$begingroup$
It should be noted that radiation is much less efficient than the other two, which is why space suits, the Space Shuttle and the ISS need big radiators or other cooling systems. This is a bit counter-intuitive given that "everybody knows" space is cold. The reason is that space is also very empty, so there is nothing to conduct to or convect with.
$endgroup$
– Jörg W Mittag
16 hours ago
5
5
$begingroup$
@JörgWMittag AFAIK the space suits aren't even big enough for that - they use disposable coolant, and when you run out (or the fans break down), you die of heatstroke in short order.
$endgroup$
– Luaan
15 hours ago
$begingroup$
@JörgWMittag AFAIK the space suits aren't even big enough for that - they use disposable coolant, and when you run out (or the fans break down), you die of heatstroke in short order.
$endgroup$
– Luaan
15 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
@JörgWMittag: What do you mean exactly, "radiation is much less efficient than the other two"? It depends on temperature levels and what's between the two bodies. I hear convection and conduction aren't very efficient to transfer thermal energy between the Sun and Earth.
$endgroup$
– Eric Duminil
13 hours ago
$begingroup$
@JörgWMittag: What do you mean exactly, "radiation is much less efficient than the other two"? It depends on temperature levels and what's between the two bodies. I hear convection and conduction aren't very efficient to transfer thermal energy between the Sun and Earth.
$endgroup$
– Eric Duminil
13 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
@JörgWMittag very well put and a great real world example is water vs. air and the human body. It's relatively comfortable to get out in 72F/22C air but to get into water of that temperature is extremely cold!
$endgroup$
– jwh20
13 hours ago
$begingroup$
@JörgWMittag very well put and a great real world example is water vs. air and the human body. It's relatively comfortable to get out in 72F/22C air but to get into water of that temperature is extremely cold!
$endgroup$
– jwh20
13 hours ago
3
3
$begingroup$
Most importantly for the question, if there's no object around you, your body radiates infrared anyway, not caring if the radiation will land on the Earth, the Moon, Alpha Centauri or nothing at all.
$endgroup$
– Eric Duminil
13 hours ago
$begingroup$
Most importantly for the question, if there's no object around you, your body radiates infrared anyway, not caring if the radiation will land on the Earth, the Moon, Alpha Centauri or nothing at all.
$endgroup$
– Eric Duminil
13 hours ago
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
Everything that is not 0 Kelvin radiates electromagnetic energy. In vacuum, this is the only relevant form of heat transfer. The hotter you are, the more you energy you radiate (I believe the relevant equation is given here).
So, the question whether you cool off or heat up in space depends on whether you absorbs more electromagnetic radiation than you give away. So, for instance, if you are orbiting Earth in plain sunlight, you may actually warm up, because there is lot of electromagnetic energy coming from the sun (much of it as visible light).
But if you are in the shadow of the Earth, the amount of energy that comes from night side of Earth and the general direction of the outer space is very low compared the the amount of energy you radiate away at 37ºC, so you cool off and eventually freeze.
$endgroup$
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
Everything that is not 0 Kelvin radiates electromagnetic energy. In vacuum, this is the only relevant form of heat transfer. The hotter you are, the more you energy you radiate (I believe the relevant equation is given here).
So, the question whether you cool off or heat up in space depends on whether you absorbs more electromagnetic radiation than you give away. So, for instance, if you are orbiting Earth in plain sunlight, you may actually warm up, because there is lot of electromagnetic energy coming from the sun (much of it as visible light).
But if you are in the shadow of the Earth, the amount of energy that comes from night side of Earth and the general direction of the outer space is very low compared the the amount of energy you radiate away at 37ºC, so you cool off and eventually freeze.
$endgroup$
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
Everything that is not 0 Kelvin radiates electromagnetic energy. In vacuum, this is the only relevant form of heat transfer. The hotter you are, the more you energy you radiate (I believe the relevant equation is given here).
So, the question whether you cool off or heat up in space depends on whether you absorbs more electromagnetic radiation than you give away. So, for instance, if you are orbiting Earth in plain sunlight, you may actually warm up, because there is lot of electromagnetic energy coming from the sun (much of it as visible light).
But if you are in the shadow of the Earth, the amount of energy that comes from night side of Earth and the general direction of the outer space is very low compared the the amount of energy you radiate away at 37ºC, so you cool off and eventually freeze.
$endgroup$
Everything that is not 0 Kelvin radiates electromagnetic energy. In vacuum, this is the only relevant form of heat transfer. The hotter you are, the more you energy you radiate (I believe the relevant equation is given here).
So, the question whether you cool off or heat up in space depends on whether you absorbs more electromagnetic radiation than you give away. So, for instance, if you are orbiting Earth in plain sunlight, you may actually warm up, because there is lot of electromagnetic energy coming from the sun (much of it as visible light).
But if you are in the shadow of the Earth, the amount of energy that comes from night side of Earth and the general direction of the outer space is very low compared the the amount of energy you radiate away at 37ºC, so you cool off and eventually freeze.
answered 11 hours ago
lvellalvella
4702 silver badges15 bronze badges
4702 silver badges15 bronze badges
add a comment
|
add a comment
|
Thanks for contributing an answer to Physics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphysics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f503023%2fwhy-do-things-cool-down%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
$begingroup$
Molecules can give off electromagnetic radiation; their energy is transferred to the E.M. field itself. Eventually energy becomes evenly distributed, meaning that there can be no net gain or loss of energy. When that happens, objects will not cool off; entropy is maximised.
$endgroup$
– user234461
14 hours ago
3
$begingroup$
The term you're looking for is Black-body radiation. Any object above 0K radiates heat away.
$endgroup$
– Tomáš Zato
12 hours ago