Around usage results Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm...
Around usage results
If my PI received research grants from a company to be able to pay my postdoc salary, did I have a potential conflict interest too?
Is it cost-effective to upgrade an old-ish Giant Escape R3 commuter bike with entry-level branded parts (wheels, drivetrain)?
Why didn't Eitri join the fight?
Is the Standard Deduction better than Itemized when both are the same amount?
Should I use a zero-interest credit card for a large one-time purchase?
An adverb for when you're not exaggerating
Is it a good idea to use CNN to classify 1D signal?
Why aren't air breathing engines used as small first stages
Extracting terms with certain heads in a function
What would be the ideal power source for a cybernetic eye?
Circuit to "zoom in" on mV fluctuations of a DC signal?
What does "lightly crushed" mean for cardamon pods?
Is there any way for the UK Prime Minister to make a motion directly dependent on Government confidence?
What is this building called? (It was built in 2002)
Is "Reachable Object" really an NP-complete problem?
また usage in a dictionary
Why wasn't DOSKEY integrated with COMMAND.COM?
When a candle burns, why does the top of wick glow if bottom of flame is hottest?
How to compare two different files line by line in unix?
Dating a Former Employee
Would "destroying" Wurmcoil Engine prevent its tokens from being created?
How to tell that you are a giant?
Why are both D and D# fitting into my E minor key?
Around usage results
Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?SlotSequence (##) form analogous to #[[ ;; n]]How can I avoid getting the error message Goto::nolabel in my code?Association of pure functionsDictionaryLoopkup - pattern specificationWhat is the relationship between Thread and MapThreadWhat are the requirements for a well behaved indexed variable? Subscript, ToExpression, Downvalue?Understanding Part and Span operating on expressions with heads that are not ListWhy does using replacement rules give a different result than setting the variable?Problem storing $x_j$ terms in variable xUnexpected behavior from Apply
$begingroup$
Why is
Around[10, 1]^2
- +- 20
and
Around[10, 1] Around[10, 1]
giving 100 +- 14 ?
Just curious I would suspect them to be the same but I'm not an expert on this for sure.
core-language
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Why is
Around[10, 1]^2
- +- 20
and
Around[10, 1] Around[10, 1]
giving 100 +- 14 ?
Just curious I would suspect them to be the same but I'm not an expert on this for sure.
core-language
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
If the intent forAroundin Mathematica is for propagating errors, then this is almost certainly a bug. Interestingly enough, I think the second one is correct, whereas the first is not.
$endgroup$
– march
8 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Why is
Around[10, 1]^2
- +- 20
and
Around[10, 1] Around[10, 1]
giving 100 +- 14 ?
Just curious I would suspect them to be the same but I'm not an expert on this for sure.
core-language
$endgroup$
Why is
Around[10, 1]^2
- +- 20
and
Around[10, 1] Around[10, 1]
giving 100 +- 14 ?
Just curious I would suspect them to be the same but I'm not an expert on this for sure.
core-language
core-language
asked 8 hours ago
LouLou
1,6581323
1,6581323
$begingroup$
If the intent forAroundin Mathematica is for propagating errors, then this is almost certainly a bug. Interestingly enough, I think the second one is correct, whereas the first is not.
$endgroup$
– march
8 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If the intent forAroundin Mathematica is for propagating errors, then this is almost certainly a bug. Interestingly enough, I think the second one is correct, whereas the first is not.
$endgroup$
– march
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
If the intent for
Around in Mathematica is for propagating errors, then this is almost certainly a bug. Interestingly enough, I think the second one is correct, whereas the first is not.$endgroup$
– march
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
If the intent for
Around in Mathematica is for propagating errors, then this is almost certainly a bug. Interestingly enough, I think the second one is correct, whereas the first is not.$endgroup$
– march
8 hours ago
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
There's a subtlety here.
When operating together multiple Arounds, the two uncertainties will be considered separate and independent (in the statistical sense). Thus the result will be different from squaring a single one.
Consider
N@StandardDeviation@
TransformedDistribution[
x y,
{x [Distributed] NormalDistribution[10, 1],
y [Distributed] NormalDistribution[10, 1]}]
(* 14.1774 *)
versus
N@StandardDeviation@TransformedDistribution[x^2, {x [Distributed] NormalDistribution[10, 1]}]
(* 20.0499 *)
The same can also be observed with addition:
Around[10, 1] + Around[10, 1]
(* Around[20., 1.4142135623730951`] *)
2 Around[10, 1]
(* Around[20., 2.] *)
To specify that all occurrences of an Around expression are the same, use AroundReplace.
For example, compare
x^2 + x /. x -> Around[1, .1]
(* Around[2., 0.223606797749979] *)
with
AroundReplace[x^2 + x, x -> Around[1, .1]]
(* Around[2., 0.30000000000000004`] *)
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Also,AroundReplace[ x1 x2, {{x1, x2} -> VectorAround[{10., 10.}, {{1., 1.}, 1.}]}]vsAroundReplace[ x1 x2, {{x1, x2} -> VectorAround[{10., 10.}, {{1., 1.}, 0.}]}].
$endgroup$
– b.gatessucks
8 hours ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "387"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathematica.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f195400%2faround-usage-results%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
There's a subtlety here.
When operating together multiple Arounds, the two uncertainties will be considered separate and independent (in the statistical sense). Thus the result will be different from squaring a single one.
Consider
N@StandardDeviation@
TransformedDistribution[
x y,
{x [Distributed] NormalDistribution[10, 1],
y [Distributed] NormalDistribution[10, 1]}]
(* 14.1774 *)
versus
N@StandardDeviation@TransformedDistribution[x^2, {x [Distributed] NormalDistribution[10, 1]}]
(* 20.0499 *)
The same can also be observed with addition:
Around[10, 1] + Around[10, 1]
(* Around[20., 1.4142135623730951`] *)
2 Around[10, 1]
(* Around[20., 2.] *)
To specify that all occurrences of an Around expression are the same, use AroundReplace.
For example, compare
x^2 + x /. x -> Around[1, .1]
(* Around[2., 0.223606797749979] *)
with
AroundReplace[x^2 + x, x -> Around[1, .1]]
(* Around[2., 0.30000000000000004`] *)
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Also,AroundReplace[ x1 x2, {{x1, x2} -> VectorAround[{10., 10.}, {{1., 1.}, 1.}]}]vsAroundReplace[ x1 x2, {{x1, x2} -> VectorAround[{10., 10.}, {{1., 1.}, 0.}]}].
$endgroup$
– b.gatessucks
8 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
There's a subtlety here.
When operating together multiple Arounds, the two uncertainties will be considered separate and independent (in the statistical sense). Thus the result will be different from squaring a single one.
Consider
N@StandardDeviation@
TransformedDistribution[
x y,
{x [Distributed] NormalDistribution[10, 1],
y [Distributed] NormalDistribution[10, 1]}]
(* 14.1774 *)
versus
N@StandardDeviation@TransformedDistribution[x^2, {x [Distributed] NormalDistribution[10, 1]}]
(* 20.0499 *)
The same can also be observed with addition:
Around[10, 1] + Around[10, 1]
(* Around[20., 1.4142135623730951`] *)
2 Around[10, 1]
(* Around[20., 2.] *)
To specify that all occurrences of an Around expression are the same, use AroundReplace.
For example, compare
x^2 + x /. x -> Around[1, .1]
(* Around[2., 0.223606797749979] *)
with
AroundReplace[x^2 + x, x -> Around[1, .1]]
(* Around[2., 0.30000000000000004`] *)
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Also,AroundReplace[ x1 x2, {{x1, x2} -> VectorAround[{10., 10.}, {{1., 1.}, 1.}]}]vsAroundReplace[ x1 x2, {{x1, x2} -> VectorAround[{10., 10.}, {{1., 1.}, 0.}]}].
$endgroup$
– b.gatessucks
8 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
There's a subtlety here.
When operating together multiple Arounds, the two uncertainties will be considered separate and independent (in the statistical sense). Thus the result will be different from squaring a single one.
Consider
N@StandardDeviation@
TransformedDistribution[
x y,
{x [Distributed] NormalDistribution[10, 1],
y [Distributed] NormalDistribution[10, 1]}]
(* 14.1774 *)
versus
N@StandardDeviation@TransformedDistribution[x^2, {x [Distributed] NormalDistribution[10, 1]}]
(* 20.0499 *)
The same can also be observed with addition:
Around[10, 1] + Around[10, 1]
(* Around[20., 1.4142135623730951`] *)
2 Around[10, 1]
(* Around[20., 2.] *)
To specify that all occurrences of an Around expression are the same, use AroundReplace.
For example, compare
x^2 + x /. x -> Around[1, .1]
(* Around[2., 0.223606797749979] *)
with
AroundReplace[x^2 + x, x -> Around[1, .1]]
(* Around[2., 0.30000000000000004`] *)
$endgroup$
There's a subtlety here.
When operating together multiple Arounds, the two uncertainties will be considered separate and independent (in the statistical sense). Thus the result will be different from squaring a single one.
Consider
N@StandardDeviation@
TransformedDistribution[
x y,
{x [Distributed] NormalDistribution[10, 1],
y [Distributed] NormalDistribution[10, 1]}]
(* 14.1774 *)
versus
N@StandardDeviation@TransformedDistribution[x^2, {x [Distributed] NormalDistribution[10, 1]}]
(* 20.0499 *)
The same can also be observed with addition:
Around[10, 1] + Around[10, 1]
(* Around[20., 1.4142135623730951`] *)
2 Around[10, 1]
(* Around[20., 2.] *)
To specify that all occurrences of an Around expression are the same, use AroundReplace.
For example, compare
x^2 + x /. x -> Around[1, .1]
(* Around[2., 0.223606797749979] *)
with
AroundReplace[x^2 + x, x -> Around[1, .1]]
(* Around[2., 0.30000000000000004`] *)
edited 7 hours ago
Carl Lange
5,36411242
5,36411242
answered 8 hours ago
SzabolcsSzabolcs
164k14449953
164k14449953
$begingroup$
Also,AroundReplace[ x1 x2, {{x1, x2} -> VectorAround[{10., 10.}, {{1., 1.}, 1.}]}]vsAroundReplace[ x1 x2, {{x1, x2} -> VectorAround[{10., 10.}, {{1., 1.}, 0.}]}].
$endgroup$
– b.gatessucks
8 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Also,AroundReplace[ x1 x2, {{x1, x2} -> VectorAround[{10., 10.}, {{1., 1.}, 1.}]}]vsAroundReplace[ x1 x2, {{x1, x2} -> VectorAround[{10., 10.}, {{1., 1.}, 0.}]}].
$endgroup$
– b.gatessucks
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
Also,
AroundReplace[ x1 x2, {{x1, x2} -> VectorAround[{10., 10.}, {{1., 1.}, 1.}]}] vs AroundReplace[ x1 x2, {{x1, x2} -> VectorAround[{10., 10.}, {{1., 1.}, 0.}]}].$endgroup$
– b.gatessucks
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
Also,
AroundReplace[ x1 x2, {{x1, x2} -> VectorAround[{10., 10.}, {{1., 1.}, 1.}]}] vs AroundReplace[ x1 x2, {{x1, x2} -> VectorAround[{10., 10.}, {{1., 1.}, 0.}]}].$endgroup$
– b.gatessucks
8 hours ago
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematica Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathematica.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f195400%2faround-usage-results%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
If the intent for
Aroundin Mathematica is for propagating errors, then this is almost certainly a bug. Interestingly enough, I think the second one is correct, whereas the first is not.$endgroup$
– march
8 hours ago