Why does my Macbook overheat and use so much CPU and energy when on YouTube?Why do so many insist on using...
Which skill should be used for secret doors or traps: Perception or Investigation?
Why do freehub and cassette have only one position that matches?
How to assert on pagereference where the endpoint of pagereference is predefined
How can I fairly adjudicate the effects of height differences on ranged attacks?
Unidentified items in bicycle tube repair kit
Save terminal output to a txt file
If 1. e4 c6 is considered as a sound defense for black, why is 1. c3 so rare?
Was Hulk present at this event?
Pressure to defend the relevance of one's area of mathematics
Junior developer struggles: how to communicate with management?
Write to EXCEL from SQL DB using VBA script
Is thermodynamics only applicable to systems in equilibrium?
Why are notes ordered like they are on a piano?
How did Arya get back her dagger from Sansa?
Is it always OK to ask for a copy of the lecturer's slides?
Attending a conference where my ex-supervisor and his collaborator are present, should I attend?
Transfer over $10k
How did Arya manage to disguise herself?
How does NAND gate work? (Very basic question)
Can I use 1000v rectifier diodes instead of 600v rectifier diodes?
Was Unix ever a single-user OS?
Packet sniffer for MacOS Mojave and above
Does the Darkness spell dispel the Color Spray and Flaming Sphere spells?
A non-technological, repeating, phenomenon in the sky, holding its position in the sky for hours
Why does my Macbook overheat and use so much CPU and energy when on YouTube?
Why do so many insist on using Google Chrome instead of Safari?Parallels VM process has high CPU on Macbook Pro Retina when running Chrome in Parallels 8How does Parallels' CPU and ram usage work? When to shutdown virtual machine?Google Chrome Helper for “GPU Process” constantly shown as non responsive in OS X 10.9High CPU and energy usage in SafariMacbook Air screen drawing suddenly slowWhy a sudden increase in CPU when battery low?Mac at 100% CPU Usage when plugged into monitorWhat could cause a huge spike in Unix System Calls for a process and how to debugMacbook performance issues with browsersMessages and soagent making CPU spike - any solutions?
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}
For a long time now, my Macbook has been overheating and hogging my CPU. According to Activity Monitor, Google Chrome Helper is the culprit. Whenever I am browsing the web, there are usually ten seperate entries of Google Chrome Helper in Activity Monitor, each individually using around %0.5 of my CPU. On YouTube, one of these can spike up to using %82, with a second using %22. I don't understand the math behind it but its evident in the screenshots I took. I own an up-to-date MacBook Pro (13-inch, Mid 2012) so it could be a result of an old system but only Chrome and YouTube (or just videos) are causing this issue.
Here are some things I’ve attempted to control / solve this:
- updating FlashPlayer
- disabling extentions
- turning off Unsandboxed plug-in access to "not allow any site to use a plug-in to access [my] computer"
- turning off JavaScript (which, of course, just stopped the page from loading in - very power efficient and cool, but not the trade off I had hoped to accomplish)
I've tried other web browsing apps and they net similar results as Chrome. I believe it has something to do with videos in general that are being served
At the moment, I have had to use an app called MacsFanControl so my fan stops the CPU and computer from overheating as it used to get to around 50˚C. Now, it is sits at 40˚C with the fan running on high to prevent it increasing.
Am I missing controls or options to have less heat from the CPU of this era MacBook Pro?
mac google-chrome cpu activity-monitor cooling
New contributor
add a comment |
For a long time now, my Macbook has been overheating and hogging my CPU. According to Activity Monitor, Google Chrome Helper is the culprit. Whenever I am browsing the web, there are usually ten seperate entries of Google Chrome Helper in Activity Monitor, each individually using around %0.5 of my CPU. On YouTube, one of these can spike up to using %82, with a second using %22. I don't understand the math behind it but its evident in the screenshots I took. I own an up-to-date MacBook Pro (13-inch, Mid 2012) so it could be a result of an old system but only Chrome and YouTube (or just videos) are causing this issue.
Here are some things I’ve attempted to control / solve this:
- updating FlashPlayer
- disabling extentions
- turning off Unsandboxed plug-in access to "not allow any site to use a plug-in to access [my] computer"
- turning off JavaScript (which, of course, just stopped the page from loading in - very power efficient and cool, but not the trade off I had hoped to accomplish)
I've tried other web browsing apps and they net similar results as Chrome. I believe it has something to do with videos in general that are being served
At the moment, I have had to use an app called MacsFanControl so my fan stops the CPU and computer from overheating as it used to get to around 50˚C. Now, it is sits at 40˚C with the fan running on high to prevent it increasing.
Am I missing controls or options to have less heat from the CPU of this era MacBook Pro?
mac google-chrome cpu activity-monitor cooling
New contributor
Macbooks are temperature resilient, more than PCs. Mine (Core i7 Late 2013) is running steady at 48˚C, more on Youtube, with MacsFanControl kick-in at 54˚C. 40˚C is a dream, it's like new laptop.
– modlin
7 hours ago
1
Videos are processor intensive. Chrome has flash built-in. Uninstall the Flash plugin or disable it in Safari and try that. You may get some better results using a different decoder. Steve Jobs was right in keeping flash of iOS, it is a pox on the web and exceptionally inefficient. That may be half your problem right there.
– Steve Chambers
6 hours ago
Did you try a local video for comparison?
– John Keates
3 hours ago
add a comment |
For a long time now, my Macbook has been overheating and hogging my CPU. According to Activity Monitor, Google Chrome Helper is the culprit. Whenever I am browsing the web, there are usually ten seperate entries of Google Chrome Helper in Activity Monitor, each individually using around %0.5 of my CPU. On YouTube, one of these can spike up to using %82, with a second using %22. I don't understand the math behind it but its evident in the screenshots I took. I own an up-to-date MacBook Pro (13-inch, Mid 2012) so it could be a result of an old system but only Chrome and YouTube (or just videos) are causing this issue.
Here are some things I’ve attempted to control / solve this:
- updating FlashPlayer
- disabling extentions
- turning off Unsandboxed plug-in access to "not allow any site to use a plug-in to access [my] computer"
- turning off JavaScript (which, of course, just stopped the page from loading in - very power efficient and cool, but not the trade off I had hoped to accomplish)
I've tried other web browsing apps and they net similar results as Chrome. I believe it has something to do with videos in general that are being served
At the moment, I have had to use an app called MacsFanControl so my fan stops the CPU and computer from overheating as it used to get to around 50˚C. Now, it is sits at 40˚C with the fan running on high to prevent it increasing.
Am I missing controls or options to have less heat from the CPU of this era MacBook Pro?
mac google-chrome cpu activity-monitor cooling
New contributor
For a long time now, my Macbook has been overheating and hogging my CPU. According to Activity Monitor, Google Chrome Helper is the culprit. Whenever I am browsing the web, there are usually ten seperate entries of Google Chrome Helper in Activity Monitor, each individually using around %0.5 of my CPU. On YouTube, one of these can spike up to using %82, with a second using %22. I don't understand the math behind it but its evident in the screenshots I took. I own an up-to-date MacBook Pro (13-inch, Mid 2012) so it could be a result of an old system but only Chrome and YouTube (or just videos) are causing this issue.
Here are some things I’ve attempted to control / solve this:
- updating FlashPlayer
- disabling extentions
- turning off Unsandboxed plug-in access to "not allow any site to use a plug-in to access [my] computer"
- turning off JavaScript (which, of course, just stopped the page from loading in - very power efficient and cool, but not the trade off I had hoped to accomplish)
I've tried other web browsing apps and they net similar results as Chrome. I believe it has something to do with videos in general that are being served
At the moment, I have had to use an app called MacsFanControl so my fan stops the CPU and computer from overheating as it used to get to around 50˚C. Now, it is sits at 40˚C with the fan running on high to prevent it increasing.
Am I missing controls or options to have less heat from the CPU of this era MacBook Pro?
mac google-chrome cpu activity-monitor cooling
mac google-chrome cpu activity-monitor cooling
New contributor
New contributor
edited 4 hours ago
bmike♦
163k46293634
163k46293634
New contributor
asked 7 hours ago
SamStarkSamStark
211
211
New contributor
New contributor
Macbooks are temperature resilient, more than PCs. Mine (Core i7 Late 2013) is running steady at 48˚C, more on Youtube, with MacsFanControl kick-in at 54˚C. 40˚C is a dream, it's like new laptop.
– modlin
7 hours ago
1
Videos are processor intensive. Chrome has flash built-in. Uninstall the Flash plugin or disable it in Safari and try that. You may get some better results using a different decoder. Steve Jobs was right in keeping flash of iOS, it is a pox on the web and exceptionally inefficient. That may be half your problem right there.
– Steve Chambers
6 hours ago
Did you try a local video for comparison?
– John Keates
3 hours ago
add a comment |
Macbooks are temperature resilient, more than PCs. Mine (Core i7 Late 2013) is running steady at 48˚C, more on Youtube, with MacsFanControl kick-in at 54˚C. 40˚C is a dream, it's like new laptop.
– modlin
7 hours ago
1
Videos are processor intensive. Chrome has flash built-in. Uninstall the Flash plugin or disable it in Safari and try that. You may get some better results using a different decoder. Steve Jobs was right in keeping flash of iOS, it is a pox on the web and exceptionally inefficient. That may be half your problem right there.
– Steve Chambers
6 hours ago
Did you try a local video for comparison?
– John Keates
3 hours ago
Macbooks are temperature resilient, more than PCs. Mine (Core i7 Late 2013) is running steady at 48˚C, more on Youtube, with MacsFanControl kick-in at 54˚C. 40˚C is a dream, it's like new laptop.
– modlin
7 hours ago
Macbooks are temperature resilient, more than PCs. Mine (Core i7 Late 2013) is running steady at 48˚C, more on Youtube, with MacsFanControl kick-in at 54˚C. 40˚C is a dream, it's like new laptop.
– modlin
7 hours ago
1
1
Videos are processor intensive. Chrome has flash built-in. Uninstall the Flash plugin or disable it in Safari and try that. You may get some better results using a different decoder. Steve Jobs was right in keeping flash of iOS, it is a pox on the web and exceptionally inefficient. That may be half your problem right there.
– Steve Chambers
6 hours ago
Videos are processor intensive. Chrome has flash built-in. Uninstall the Flash plugin or disable it in Safari and try that. You may get some better results using a different decoder. Steve Jobs was right in keeping flash of iOS, it is a pox on the web and exceptionally inefficient. That may be half your problem right there.
– Steve Chambers
6 hours ago
Did you try a local video for comparison?
– John Keates
3 hours ago
Did you try a local video for comparison?
– John Keates
3 hours ago
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
I’d suggest trying Opera browser if you have not. I’m sure someone will have bench tested browser resource use.
Also I think there two problems here, intense graphics and a greedy browser.
It might also be worth checking if you can, if the heat sink for the GPU is clogged with dust.
The fan control you mention is excellent.
Can you reduce the resolution settings for YouTube only and try this with the same video?
I have had major overheating grief with my iMac 27” 2011 GPU.
New contributor
1
I lowered the video quality as you suggested and it did make a huge improvement. The CPU percentage for one of the ten Chrome Helpers went from %82 to %33. However, the second intensive Helper remained at %20.
– SamStark
3 hours ago
add a comment |
You can test the efficiency of video encoding and decoding quite well by getting a video from Apple’s events page and playing it in QuickTime player.
Same in Safari - and then same in Chrome.
You’ll quickly find out which encoding are easy to run for the CPU and which have GPU acceleration.
When that’s done, you can see if Chrome or the app in question can choose a lower resolution or if you can download the file for offline playing so that it doesn’t hit the CPU so hard. Also, you might use an iPad or other far more efficient video handling device if you just want to watch videos with the most economy / least power.
add a comment |
Google Chrome is exceptionally inefficient, especially on macOS. Some developers (including myself) suspect Google has purposely made Chrome consume excessive and absurdly expensive resources.
Just for grins, try using Safari instead of Chrome.
If that convinces you Chrome is a resource pig, try using Firefox for the same activities.
In my experiments, Firefox is 15% worse than Safari, but Chrome squeals like a pig.
See Why do so many insist on using Google Chrome instead of Safari?
1
OP has already tried other web browsers: "I've tried other web browsing apps and they net similar results as Chrome. I believe it has something to do with videos in general."
– abc
6 hours ago
I went to the YouTube homepage, and the FirefoxCP Web Content (seperate entry from Firefox in Activity Monitor) spiked to 68%.
– SamStark
3 hours ago
At the risk of entering full-on crackpot territory, what motivation would Google possibly have for purposely making Chrome exceptionally resource-inefficient on macOS?
– Cody Gray
4 mins ago
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
I’d suggest trying Opera browser if you have not. I’m sure someone will have bench tested browser resource use.
Also I think there two problems here, intense graphics and a greedy browser.
It might also be worth checking if you can, if the heat sink for the GPU is clogged with dust.
The fan control you mention is excellent.
Can you reduce the resolution settings for YouTube only and try this with the same video?
I have had major overheating grief with my iMac 27” 2011 GPU.
New contributor
1
I lowered the video quality as you suggested and it did make a huge improvement. The CPU percentage for one of the ten Chrome Helpers went from %82 to %33. However, the second intensive Helper remained at %20.
– SamStark
3 hours ago
add a comment |
I’d suggest trying Opera browser if you have not. I’m sure someone will have bench tested browser resource use.
Also I think there two problems here, intense graphics and a greedy browser.
It might also be worth checking if you can, if the heat sink for the GPU is clogged with dust.
The fan control you mention is excellent.
Can you reduce the resolution settings for YouTube only and try this with the same video?
I have had major overheating grief with my iMac 27” 2011 GPU.
New contributor
1
I lowered the video quality as you suggested and it did make a huge improvement. The CPU percentage for one of the ten Chrome Helpers went from %82 to %33. However, the second intensive Helper remained at %20.
– SamStark
3 hours ago
add a comment |
I’d suggest trying Opera browser if you have not. I’m sure someone will have bench tested browser resource use.
Also I think there two problems here, intense graphics and a greedy browser.
It might also be worth checking if you can, if the heat sink for the GPU is clogged with dust.
The fan control you mention is excellent.
Can you reduce the resolution settings for YouTube only and try this with the same video?
I have had major overheating grief with my iMac 27” 2011 GPU.
New contributor
I’d suggest trying Opera browser if you have not. I’m sure someone will have bench tested browser resource use.
Also I think there two problems here, intense graphics and a greedy browser.
It might also be worth checking if you can, if the heat sink for the GPU is clogged with dust.
The fan control you mention is excellent.
Can you reduce the resolution settings for YouTube only and try this with the same video?
I have had major overheating grief with my iMac 27” 2011 GPU.
New contributor
New contributor
answered 4 hours ago
StefanStefan
1112
1112
New contributor
New contributor
1
I lowered the video quality as you suggested and it did make a huge improvement. The CPU percentage for one of the ten Chrome Helpers went from %82 to %33. However, the second intensive Helper remained at %20.
– SamStark
3 hours ago
add a comment |
1
I lowered the video quality as you suggested and it did make a huge improvement. The CPU percentage for one of the ten Chrome Helpers went from %82 to %33. However, the second intensive Helper remained at %20.
– SamStark
3 hours ago
1
1
I lowered the video quality as you suggested and it did make a huge improvement. The CPU percentage for one of the ten Chrome Helpers went from %82 to %33. However, the second intensive Helper remained at %20.
– SamStark
3 hours ago
I lowered the video quality as you suggested and it did make a huge improvement. The CPU percentage for one of the ten Chrome Helpers went from %82 to %33. However, the second intensive Helper remained at %20.
– SamStark
3 hours ago
add a comment |
You can test the efficiency of video encoding and decoding quite well by getting a video from Apple’s events page and playing it in QuickTime player.
Same in Safari - and then same in Chrome.
You’ll quickly find out which encoding are easy to run for the CPU and which have GPU acceleration.
When that’s done, you can see if Chrome or the app in question can choose a lower resolution or if you can download the file for offline playing so that it doesn’t hit the CPU so hard. Also, you might use an iPad or other far more efficient video handling device if you just want to watch videos with the most economy / least power.
add a comment |
You can test the efficiency of video encoding and decoding quite well by getting a video from Apple’s events page and playing it in QuickTime player.
Same in Safari - and then same in Chrome.
You’ll quickly find out which encoding are easy to run for the CPU and which have GPU acceleration.
When that’s done, you can see if Chrome or the app in question can choose a lower resolution or if you can download the file for offline playing so that it doesn’t hit the CPU so hard. Also, you might use an iPad or other far more efficient video handling device if you just want to watch videos with the most economy / least power.
add a comment |
You can test the efficiency of video encoding and decoding quite well by getting a video from Apple’s events page and playing it in QuickTime player.
Same in Safari - and then same in Chrome.
You’ll quickly find out which encoding are easy to run for the CPU and which have GPU acceleration.
When that’s done, you can see if Chrome or the app in question can choose a lower resolution or if you can download the file for offline playing so that it doesn’t hit the CPU so hard. Also, you might use an iPad or other far more efficient video handling device if you just want to watch videos with the most economy / least power.
You can test the efficiency of video encoding and decoding quite well by getting a video from Apple’s events page and playing it in QuickTime player.
Same in Safari - and then same in Chrome.
You’ll quickly find out which encoding are easy to run for the CPU and which have GPU acceleration.
When that’s done, you can see if Chrome or the app in question can choose a lower resolution or if you can download the file for offline playing so that it doesn’t hit the CPU so hard. Also, you might use an iPad or other far more efficient video handling device if you just want to watch videos with the most economy / least power.
answered 4 hours ago
bmike♦bmike
163k46293634
163k46293634
add a comment |
add a comment |
Google Chrome is exceptionally inefficient, especially on macOS. Some developers (including myself) suspect Google has purposely made Chrome consume excessive and absurdly expensive resources.
Just for grins, try using Safari instead of Chrome.
If that convinces you Chrome is a resource pig, try using Firefox for the same activities.
In my experiments, Firefox is 15% worse than Safari, but Chrome squeals like a pig.
See Why do so many insist on using Google Chrome instead of Safari?
1
OP has already tried other web browsers: "I've tried other web browsing apps and they net similar results as Chrome. I believe it has something to do with videos in general."
– abc
6 hours ago
I went to the YouTube homepage, and the FirefoxCP Web Content (seperate entry from Firefox in Activity Monitor) spiked to 68%.
– SamStark
3 hours ago
At the risk of entering full-on crackpot territory, what motivation would Google possibly have for purposely making Chrome exceptionally resource-inefficient on macOS?
– Cody Gray
4 mins ago
add a comment |
Google Chrome is exceptionally inefficient, especially on macOS. Some developers (including myself) suspect Google has purposely made Chrome consume excessive and absurdly expensive resources.
Just for grins, try using Safari instead of Chrome.
If that convinces you Chrome is a resource pig, try using Firefox for the same activities.
In my experiments, Firefox is 15% worse than Safari, but Chrome squeals like a pig.
See Why do so many insist on using Google Chrome instead of Safari?
1
OP has already tried other web browsers: "I've tried other web browsing apps and they net similar results as Chrome. I believe it has something to do with videos in general."
– abc
6 hours ago
I went to the YouTube homepage, and the FirefoxCP Web Content (seperate entry from Firefox in Activity Monitor) spiked to 68%.
– SamStark
3 hours ago
At the risk of entering full-on crackpot territory, what motivation would Google possibly have for purposely making Chrome exceptionally resource-inefficient on macOS?
– Cody Gray
4 mins ago
add a comment |
Google Chrome is exceptionally inefficient, especially on macOS. Some developers (including myself) suspect Google has purposely made Chrome consume excessive and absurdly expensive resources.
Just for grins, try using Safari instead of Chrome.
If that convinces you Chrome is a resource pig, try using Firefox for the same activities.
In my experiments, Firefox is 15% worse than Safari, but Chrome squeals like a pig.
See Why do so many insist on using Google Chrome instead of Safari?
Google Chrome is exceptionally inefficient, especially on macOS. Some developers (including myself) suspect Google has purposely made Chrome consume excessive and absurdly expensive resources.
Just for grins, try using Safari instead of Chrome.
If that convinces you Chrome is a resource pig, try using Firefox for the same activities.
In my experiments, Firefox is 15% worse than Safari, but Chrome squeals like a pig.
See Why do so many insist on using Google Chrome instead of Safari?
edited 6 hours ago
answered 7 hours ago
Bill SmithBill Smith
69713
69713
1
OP has already tried other web browsers: "I've tried other web browsing apps and they net similar results as Chrome. I believe it has something to do with videos in general."
– abc
6 hours ago
I went to the YouTube homepage, and the FirefoxCP Web Content (seperate entry from Firefox in Activity Monitor) spiked to 68%.
– SamStark
3 hours ago
At the risk of entering full-on crackpot territory, what motivation would Google possibly have for purposely making Chrome exceptionally resource-inefficient on macOS?
– Cody Gray
4 mins ago
add a comment |
1
OP has already tried other web browsers: "I've tried other web browsing apps and they net similar results as Chrome. I believe it has something to do with videos in general."
– abc
6 hours ago
I went to the YouTube homepage, and the FirefoxCP Web Content (seperate entry from Firefox in Activity Monitor) spiked to 68%.
– SamStark
3 hours ago
At the risk of entering full-on crackpot territory, what motivation would Google possibly have for purposely making Chrome exceptionally resource-inefficient on macOS?
– Cody Gray
4 mins ago
1
1
OP has already tried other web browsers: "I've tried other web browsing apps and they net similar results as Chrome. I believe it has something to do with videos in general."
– abc
6 hours ago
OP has already tried other web browsers: "I've tried other web browsing apps and they net similar results as Chrome. I believe it has something to do with videos in general."
– abc
6 hours ago
I went to the YouTube homepage, and the FirefoxCP Web Content (seperate entry from Firefox in Activity Monitor) spiked to 68%.
– SamStark
3 hours ago
I went to the YouTube homepage, and the FirefoxCP Web Content (seperate entry from Firefox in Activity Monitor) spiked to 68%.
– SamStark
3 hours ago
At the risk of entering full-on crackpot territory, what motivation would Google possibly have for purposely making Chrome exceptionally resource-inefficient on macOS?
– Cody Gray
4 mins ago
At the risk of entering full-on crackpot territory, what motivation would Google possibly have for purposely making Chrome exceptionally resource-inefficient on macOS?
– Cody Gray
4 mins ago
add a comment |
Macbooks are temperature resilient, more than PCs. Mine (Core i7 Late 2013) is running steady at 48˚C, more on Youtube, with MacsFanControl kick-in at 54˚C. 40˚C is a dream, it's like new laptop.
– modlin
7 hours ago
1
Videos are processor intensive. Chrome has flash built-in. Uninstall the Flash plugin or disable it in Safari and try that. You may get some better results using a different decoder. Steve Jobs was right in keeping flash of iOS, it is a pox on the web and exceptionally inefficient. That may be half your problem right there.
– Steve Chambers
6 hours ago
Did you try a local video for comparison?
– John Keates
3 hours ago