How to get D-link DWA-131 Wireless-N Nano USB Adapter work on CentOS 7?Wi-Fi problems using ASUS USB-N13...
Efficient Algorithm for the boundary of a set of tiles
Where have Brexit voters gone?
How to deal with a colleague who is being aggressive?
Pirate democracy at its finest
What is a Centaur Thief's climbing speed?
How did NASA Langley end up with the first 737?
What is a fully qualified name?
Why did Jon Snow do this immoral act if he is so honorable?
Which European Languages are not Indo-European?
Sankey diagram: not getting the hang of it
Could a 19.25mm revolver actually exist?
Why does Mjolnir fall down in Age of Ultron but not in Endgame?
Make 24 using exactly three 3s
Compaq Portable vs IBM 5155 Portable PC
Is it legal to meet with potential future employers in the UK, whilst visiting from the USA
Is the field of q-series 'dead'?
Best material to absorb as much light as possible
Do photons bend spacetime or not?
Need to understand my home electrical meter to see why bill is so high and/or if neighbor is on same meter
Access to the path 'c:somepath' is denied for MSSQL CLR
Why didn't Thanos use the Time Stone to stop the Avengers' plan?
How to politely tell someone they did not hit "reply to all" in an email?
Why does this if-statement combining assignment and an equality check return true?
Why most published works in medical imaging try reducing false positives?
How to get D-link DWA-131 Wireless-N Nano USB Adapter work on CentOS 7?
Wi-Fi problems using ASUS USB-N13 adapter (realtek)Configure Atheros AR9285 wireless in GentooActivating WiFi in FedoraBackTrack USB Wireless adapter drivers issueModules for USB wireless adapter missing?Configure a usb wireless adapter when hotpluggedHow do I fix Debian that refuses to connect to the internet in VirtualBox?How to create/setup vpn using only SSH?How to setup a Belkin USB Wireless Adapter (F5D7050A)? (Linux Mint 18.1 Xfce)SSID of hostapd is not visibleCannot connect to Wifi on Linux Mint Version 4.15.0-45
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}
I am on CentOS 7. I have D-link DWA-131 Wireless-N USB Nano Hardware revision E1 adapter. I have downloaded and compiled it's drivers from ftp://files.dlink.com.au/products/DWA-131/REV_E/Drivers/DWA-131_Linux_driver_v4.3.1.1.zip. After installing and inserting the module 8192eu.ko my device is detected as USB Ethernet. How can i get it recognized as a wireless device, so that I can connect to a wireless network abc having password 12345678.
result of uname -a is
Linux linux-centos 3.10.0-693.5.2.el7.x86_64 #1 SMP Fri Oct 20 20:32:50 UTC 2017 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
result of ifconfig -a is
enp0s20u3: flags=4099<UP,BROADCAST,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
ether 54:2a:a2:47:dd:f6 txqueuelen 1000 (Ethernet)
RX packets 0 bytes 0 (0.0 B)
RX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 frame 0
TX packets 0 bytes 0 (0.0 B)
TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0
lo: flags=73<UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING> mtu 65536
inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 255.0.0.0
inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128 scopeid 0x10<host>
loop txqueuelen 1 (Local Loopback)
RX packets 7729 bytes 664831 (649.2 KiB)
RX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 frame 0
TX packets 7729 bytes 664831 (649.2 KiB)
TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0
p4p2: flags=4099<UP,BROADCAST,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
ether f8:ca:b8:06:55:c0 txqueuelen 1000 (Ethernet)
RX packets 0 bytes 0 (0.0 B)
RX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 frame 0
TX packets 0 bytes 0 (0.0 B)
TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0
virbr0: flags=4099<UP,BROADCAST,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
inet 192.168.122.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 broadcast 192.168.122.255
ether 52:54:00:1c:39:9e txqueuelen 1000 (Ethernet)
RX packets 0 bytes 0 (0.0 B)
RX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 frame 0
TX packets 0 bytes 0 (0.0 B)
TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0
virbr0-nic: flags=4098<BROADCAST,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
ether 52:54:00:1c:39:9e txqueuelen 1000 (Ethernet)
RX packets 0 bytes 0 (0.0 B)
RX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 frame 0
TX packets 0 bytes 0 (0.0 B)
TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0
wlp6s0: flags=4163<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
inet 192.168.1.22 netmask 255.255.255.0 broadcast 192.168.1.255
inet6 fe80::374e:5cb2:ec50:9c4d prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x20<link>
ether 78:0c:b8:36:8e:31 txqueuelen 1000 (Ethernet)
RX packets 122333 bytes 155288565 (148.0 MiB)
RX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 frame 0
TX packets 84226 bytes 10510089 (10.0 MiB)
TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0
enp0s20u3 is my USB device. It only shows up when I load 8192eu.ko using modprobe or insmod.
Device shown as wifi is 'internal wifi', but, the USB device is detected as USB Ethernet.
centos wifi drivers usb network-interface
bumped to the homepage by Community♦ 47 mins ago
This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
add a comment |
I am on CentOS 7. I have D-link DWA-131 Wireless-N USB Nano Hardware revision E1 adapter. I have downloaded and compiled it's drivers from ftp://files.dlink.com.au/products/DWA-131/REV_E/Drivers/DWA-131_Linux_driver_v4.3.1.1.zip. After installing and inserting the module 8192eu.ko my device is detected as USB Ethernet. How can i get it recognized as a wireless device, so that I can connect to a wireless network abc having password 12345678.
result of uname -a is
Linux linux-centos 3.10.0-693.5.2.el7.x86_64 #1 SMP Fri Oct 20 20:32:50 UTC 2017 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
result of ifconfig -a is
enp0s20u3: flags=4099<UP,BROADCAST,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
ether 54:2a:a2:47:dd:f6 txqueuelen 1000 (Ethernet)
RX packets 0 bytes 0 (0.0 B)
RX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 frame 0
TX packets 0 bytes 0 (0.0 B)
TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0
lo: flags=73<UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING> mtu 65536
inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 255.0.0.0
inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128 scopeid 0x10<host>
loop txqueuelen 1 (Local Loopback)
RX packets 7729 bytes 664831 (649.2 KiB)
RX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 frame 0
TX packets 7729 bytes 664831 (649.2 KiB)
TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0
p4p2: flags=4099<UP,BROADCAST,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
ether f8:ca:b8:06:55:c0 txqueuelen 1000 (Ethernet)
RX packets 0 bytes 0 (0.0 B)
RX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 frame 0
TX packets 0 bytes 0 (0.0 B)
TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0
virbr0: flags=4099<UP,BROADCAST,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
inet 192.168.122.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 broadcast 192.168.122.255
ether 52:54:00:1c:39:9e txqueuelen 1000 (Ethernet)
RX packets 0 bytes 0 (0.0 B)
RX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 frame 0
TX packets 0 bytes 0 (0.0 B)
TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0
virbr0-nic: flags=4098<BROADCAST,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
ether 52:54:00:1c:39:9e txqueuelen 1000 (Ethernet)
RX packets 0 bytes 0 (0.0 B)
RX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 frame 0
TX packets 0 bytes 0 (0.0 B)
TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0
wlp6s0: flags=4163<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
inet 192.168.1.22 netmask 255.255.255.0 broadcast 192.168.1.255
inet6 fe80::374e:5cb2:ec50:9c4d prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x20<link>
ether 78:0c:b8:36:8e:31 txqueuelen 1000 (Ethernet)
RX packets 122333 bytes 155288565 (148.0 MiB)
RX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 frame 0
TX packets 84226 bytes 10510089 (10.0 MiB)
TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0
enp0s20u3 is my USB device. It only shows up when I load 8192eu.ko using modprobe or insmod.
Device shown as wifi is 'internal wifi', but, the USB device is detected as USB Ethernet.
centos wifi drivers usb network-interface
bumped to the homepage by Community♦ 47 mins ago
This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
realtek based chipset products are junk unix.stackexchange.com/questions/252210/…
– Rui F Ribeiro
Nov 23 '17 at 10:02
@RuiFRibeiro I have another realtek based usb wifi device, and I am able to run it on linux (ubuntu and centos7)... for ubuntu I had to compile drivers, but it is working fine... its rtl8192cu based, the as in link you posted... it's drivers can be downloaded from (github.com/pvaret/rtl8192cu-fixes)... I am not able to install 8192eu on centos 7, as compiled drivers give the above mentioned problem
– Manjeet
Nov 26 '17 at 21:38
Nobody said they do not work at all. Just that they suck as a product.
– Rui F Ribeiro
Nov 26 '17 at 22:37
@RuiFRibeiro Can you suggest any other vendor or product which can work as usb wifi antenna, which is considered good for linux.
– Manjeet
Nov 27 '17 at 11:42
read my answer in the link of my 1st comment; it is not clear cut I am afraid....
– Rui F Ribeiro
Nov 27 '17 at 12:27
add a comment |
I am on CentOS 7. I have D-link DWA-131 Wireless-N USB Nano Hardware revision E1 adapter. I have downloaded and compiled it's drivers from ftp://files.dlink.com.au/products/DWA-131/REV_E/Drivers/DWA-131_Linux_driver_v4.3.1.1.zip. After installing and inserting the module 8192eu.ko my device is detected as USB Ethernet. How can i get it recognized as a wireless device, so that I can connect to a wireless network abc having password 12345678.
result of uname -a is
Linux linux-centos 3.10.0-693.5.2.el7.x86_64 #1 SMP Fri Oct 20 20:32:50 UTC 2017 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
result of ifconfig -a is
enp0s20u3: flags=4099<UP,BROADCAST,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
ether 54:2a:a2:47:dd:f6 txqueuelen 1000 (Ethernet)
RX packets 0 bytes 0 (0.0 B)
RX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 frame 0
TX packets 0 bytes 0 (0.0 B)
TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0
lo: flags=73<UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING> mtu 65536
inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 255.0.0.0
inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128 scopeid 0x10<host>
loop txqueuelen 1 (Local Loopback)
RX packets 7729 bytes 664831 (649.2 KiB)
RX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 frame 0
TX packets 7729 bytes 664831 (649.2 KiB)
TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0
p4p2: flags=4099<UP,BROADCAST,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
ether f8:ca:b8:06:55:c0 txqueuelen 1000 (Ethernet)
RX packets 0 bytes 0 (0.0 B)
RX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 frame 0
TX packets 0 bytes 0 (0.0 B)
TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0
virbr0: flags=4099<UP,BROADCAST,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
inet 192.168.122.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 broadcast 192.168.122.255
ether 52:54:00:1c:39:9e txqueuelen 1000 (Ethernet)
RX packets 0 bytes 0 (0.0 B)
RX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 frame 0
TX packets 0 bytes 0 (0.0 B)
TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0
virbr0-nic: flags=4098<BROADCAST,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
ether 52:54:00:1c:39:9e txqueuelen 1000 (Ethernet)
RX packets 0 bytes 0 (0.0 B)
RX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 frame 0
TX packets 0 bytes 0 (0.0 B)
TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0
wlp6s0: flags=4163<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
inet 192.168.1.22 netmask 255.255.255.0 broadcast 192.168.1.255
inet6 fe80::374e:5cb2:ec50:9c4d prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x20<link>
ether 78:0c:b8:36:8e:31 txqueuelen 1000 (Ethernet)
RX packets 122333 bytes 155288565 (148.0 MiB)
RX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 frame 0
TX packets 84226 bytes 10510089 (10.0 MiB)
TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0
enp0s20u3 is my USB device. It only shows up when I load 8192eu.ko using modprobe or insmod.
Device shown as wifi is 'internal wifi', but, the USB device is detected as USB Ethernet.
centos wifi drivers usb network-interface
I am on CentOS 7. I have D-link DWA-131 Wireless-N USB Nano Hardware revision E1 adapter. I have downloaded and compiled it's drivers from ftp://files.dlink.com.au/products/DWA-131/REV_E/Drivers/DWA-131_Linux_driver_v4.3.1.1.zip. After installing and inserting the module 8192eu.ko my device is detected as USB Ethernet. How can i get it recognized as a wireless device, so that I can connect to a wireless network abc having password 12345678.
result of uname -a is
Linux linux-centos 3.10.0-693.5.2.el7.x86_64 #1 SMP Fri Oct 20 20:32:50 UTC 2017 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
result of ifconfig -a is
enp0s20u3: flags=4099<UP,BROADCAST,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
ether 54:2a:a2:47:dd:f6 txqueuelen 1000 (Ethernet)
RX packets 0 bytes 0 (0.0 B)
RX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 frame 0
TX packets 0 bytes 0 (0.0 B)
TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0
lo: flags=73<UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING> mtu 65536
inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 255.0.0.0
inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128 scopeid 0x10<host>
loop txqueuelen 1 (Local Loopback)
RX packets 7729 bytes 664831 (649.2 KiB)
RX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 frame 0
TX packets 7729 bytes 664831 (649.2 KiB)
TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0
p4p2: flags=4099<UP,BROADCAST,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
ether f8:ca:b8:06:55:c0 txqueuelen 1000 (Ethernet)
RX packets 0 bytes 0 (0.0 B)
RX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 frame 0
TX packets 0 bytes 0 (0.0 B)
TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0
virbr0: flags=4099<UP,BROADCAST,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
inet 192.168.122.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 broadcast 192.168.122.255
ether 52:54:00:1c:39:9e txqueuelen 1000 (Ethernet)
RX packets 0 bytes 0 (0.0 B)
RX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 frame 0
TX packets 0 bytes 0 (0.0 B)
TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0
virbr0-nic: flags=4098<BROADCAST,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
ether 52:54:00:1c:39:9e txqueuelen 1000 (Ethernet)
RX packets 0 bytes 0 (0.0 B)
RX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 frame 0
TX packets 0 bytes 0 (0.0 B)
TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0
wlp6s0: flags=4163<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
inet 192.168.1.22 netmask 255.255.255.0 broadcast 192.168.1.255
inet6 fe80::374e:5cb2:ec50:9c4d prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x20<link>
ether 78:0c:b8:36:8e:31 txqueuelen 1000 (Ethernet)
RX packets 122333 bytes 155288565 (148.0 MiB)
RX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 frame 0
TX packets 84226 bytes 10510089 (10.0 MiB)
TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0
enp0s20u3 is my USB device. It only shows up when I load 8192eu.ko using modprobe or insmod.
Device shown as wifi is 'internal wifi', but, the USB device is detected as USB Ethernet.
centos wifi drivers usb network-interface
centos wifi drivers usb network-interface
edited Nov 23 '17 at 6:56
Manjeet
asked Nov 23 '17 at 6:23
ManjeetManjeet
13
13
bumped to the homepage by Community♦ 47 mins ago
This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
bumped to the homepage by Community♦ 47 mins ago
This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
realtek based chipset products are junk unix.stackexchange.com/questions/252210/…
– Rui F Ribeiro
Nov 23 '17 at 10:02
@RuiFRibeiro I have another realtek based usb wifi device, and I am able to run it on linux (ubuntu and centos7)... for ubuntu I had to compile drivers, but it is working fine... its rtl8192cu based, the as in link you posted... it's drivers can be downloaded from (github.com/pvaret/rtl8192cu-fixes)... I am not able to install 8192eu on centos 7, as compiled drivers give the above mentioned problem
– Manjeet
Nov 26 '17 at 21:38
Nobody said they do not work at all. Just that they suck as a product.
– Rui F Ribeiro
Nov 26 '17 at 22:37
@RuiFRibeiro Can you suggest any other vendor or product which can work as usb wifi antenna, which is considered good for linux.
– Manjeet
Nov 27 '17 at 11:42
read my answer in the link of my 1st comment; it is not clear cut I am afraid....
– Rui F Ribeiro
Nov 27 '17 at 12:27
add a comment |
realtek based chipset products are junk unix.stackexchange.com/questions/252210/…
– Rui F Ribeiro
Nov 23 '17 at 10:02
@RuiFRibeiro I have another realtek based usb wifi device, and I am able to run it on linux (ubuntu and centos7)... for ubuntu I had to compile drivers, but it is working fine... its rtl8192cu based, the as in link you posted... it's drivers can be downloaded from (github.com/pvaret/rtl8192cu-fixes)... I am not able to install 8192eu on centos 7, as compiled drivers give the above mentioned problem
– Manjeet
Nov 26 '17 at 21:38
Nobody said they do not work at all. Just that they suck as a product.
– Rui F Ribeiro
Nov 26 '17 at 22:37
@RuiFRibeiro Can you suggest any other vendor or product which can work as usb wifi antenna, which is considered good for linux.
– Manjeet
Nov 27 '17 at 11:42
read my answer in the link of my 1st comment; it is not clear cut I am afraid....
– Rui F Ribeiro
Nov 27 '17 at 12:27
realtek based chipset products are junk unix.stackexchange.com/questions/252210/…
– Rui F Ribeiro
Nov 23 '17 at 10:02
realtek based chipset products are junk unix.stackexchange.com/questions/252210/…
– Rui F Ribeiro
Nov 23 '17 at 10:02
@RuiFRibeiro I have another realtek based usb wifi device, and I am able to run it on linux (ubuntu and centos7)... for ubuntu I had to compile drivers, but it is working fine... its rtl8192cu based, the as in link you posted... it's drivers can be downloaded from (github.com/pvaret/rtl8192cu-fixes)... I am not able to install 8192eu on centos 7, as compiled drivers give the above mentioned problem
– Manjeet
Nov 26 '17 at 21:38
@RuiFRibeiro I have another realtek based usb wifi device, and I am able to run it on linux (ubuntu and centos7)... for ubuntu I had to compile drivers, but it is working fine... its rtl8192cu based, the as in link you posted... it's drivers can be downloaded from (github.com/pvaret/rtl8192cu-fixes)... I am not able to install 8192eu on centos 7, as compiled drivers give the above mentioned problem
– Manjeet
Nov 26 '17 at 21:38
Nobody said they do not work at all. Just that they suck as a product.
– Rui F Ribeiro
Nov 26 '17 at 22:37
Nobody said they do not work at all. Just that they suck as a product.
– Rui F Ribeiro
Nov 26 '17 at 22:37
@RuiFRibeiro Can you suggest any other vendor or product which can work as usb wifi antenna, which is considered good for linux.
– Manjeet
Nov 27 '17 at 11:42
@RuiFRibeiro Can you suggest any other vendor or product which can work as usb wifi antenna, which is considered good for linux.
– Manjeet
Nov 27 '17 at 11:42
read my answer in the link of my 1st comment; it is not clear cut I am afraid....
– Rui F Ribeiro
Nov 27 '17 at 12:27
read my answer in the link of my 1st comment; it is not clear cut I am afraid....
– Rui F Ribeiro
Nov 27 '17 at 12:27
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
For me it works only immediately after reloading the module:
modprobe -r rtl8xxxu; sleep 2; modprobe rtl8xxxu
(connection in NetworkManager pre-configured)
Besides I have additional options for it:
cat /etc/modprobe.d/rtl8xxxu.conf
options rtl8xxxu ht40_2g=1 dma_aggregation=1 rtw_power_mgnt=0 rtw_enusbss=0
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "106"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f406480%2fhow-to-get-d-link-dwa-131-wireless-n-nano-usb-adapter-work-on-centos-7%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
For me it works only immediately after reloading the module:
modprobe -r rtl8xxxu; sleep 2; modprobe rtl8xxxu
(connection in NetworkManager pre-configured)
Besides I have additional options for it:
cat /etc/modprobe.d/rtl8xxxu.conf
options rtl8xxxu ht40_2g=1 dma_aggregation=1 rtw_power_mgnt=0 rtw_enusbss=0
add a comment |
For me it works only immediately after reloading the module:
modprobe -r rtl8xxxu; sleep 2; modprobe rtl8xxxu
(connection in NetworkManager pre-configured)
Besides I have additional options for it:
cat /etc/modprobe.d/rtl8xxxu.conf
options rtl8xxxu ht40_2g=1 dma_aggregation=1 rtw_power_mgnt=0 rtw_enusbss=0
add a comment |
For me it works only immediately after reloading the module:
modprobe -r rtl8xxxu; sleep 2; modprobe rtl8xxxu
(connection in NetworkManager pre-configured)
Besides I have additional options for it:
cat /etc/modprobe.d/rtl8xxxu.conf
options rtl8xxxu ht40_2g=1 dma_aggregation=1 rtw_power_mgnt=0 rtw_enusbss=0
For me it works only immediately after reloading the module:
modprobe -r rtl8xxxu; sleep 2; modprobe rtl8xxxu
(connection in NetworkManager pre-configured)
Besides I have additional options for it:
cat /etc/modprobe.d/rtl8xxxu.conf
options rtl8xxxu ht40_2g=1 dma_aggregation=1 rtw_power_mgnt=0 rtw_enusbss=0
edited Dec 2 '18 at 23:31
roaima
47k760128
47k760128
answered Dec 2 '18 at 23:08
user323909user323909
1
1
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Unix & Linux Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f406480%2fhow-to-get-d-link-dwa-131-wireless-n-nano-usb-adapter-work-on-centos-7%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
realtek based chipset products are junk unix.stackexchange.com/questions/252210/…
– Rui F Ribeiro
Nov 23 '17 at 10:02
@RuiFRibeiro I have another realtek based usb wifi device, and I am able to run it on linux (ubuntu and centos7)... for ubuntu I had to compile drivers, but it is working fine... its rtl8192cu based, the as in link you posted... it's drivers can be downloaded from (github.com/pvaret/rtl8192cu-fixes)... I am not able to install 8192eu on centos 7, as compiled drivers give the above mentioned problem
– Manjeet
Nov 26 '17 at 21:38
Nobody said they do not work at all. Just that they suck as a product.
– Rui F Ribeiro
Nov 26 '17 at 22:37
@RuiFRibeiro Can you suggest any other vendor or product which can work as usb wifi antenna, which is considered good for linux.
– Manjeet
Nov 27 '17 at 11:42
read my answer in the link of my 1st comment; it is not clear cut I am afraid....
– Rui F Ribeiro
Nov 27 '17 at 12:27