Why do compressed liquids heat up when allowed to expand unlike gases?Why does filling a compressed air...

Is CD audio quality good enough?

Plot twist where the antagonist wins

Passing arguments from TeX to a Lua function

Is the Indo-European language family made up?

How to use " shadow " in pstricks?

Why did David Cameron offer a referendum on the European Union?

How to know if a folder is a symbolic link?

Should breaking down something like a door be adjudicated as an attempt to beat its AC and HP, or as an ability check against a set DC?

Website returning plaintext password

When and what was the first 3D acceleration device ever released?

Is "cool" appropriate or offensive to use in IMs?

Where is the logic in castrating fighters?

Why are C64 games inconsistent with which joystick port they use?

Cipher Block Chaining - How do you change the plaintext of all blocks?

Does the unit of measure matter when you are solving for the diameter of a circumference?

Is this resistor leaking? If so, is it a concern?

Is there an efficient way to replace text matching the entire content of one file with the entire content of another file?

How can I specify the last parameters in a function call and let the others default to the DEFAULT in the declaration?

Would Brexit have gone ahead by now if Gina Miller had not forced the Government to involve Parliament?

Why do most published works in medical imaging try to reduce false positives?

What are the real benefits of using Salesforce DX?

Crossing US border with music files I'm legally allowed to possess

Why is this Simple Puzzle impossible to solve?

I unknowingly submitted plagarised work



Why do compressed liquids heat up when allowed to expand unlike gases?


Why does filling a compressed air cylinder produces heat?Confusing Chemical potential of mixturesCan Kinetic Theory obtain fluids behavior?Compression vs. Friction - what happens when space objects enter earth's atmospherespecific heat in solids and liquidsWhy do some substances undergo sublimation while others do not?Thermodynamics question (heat transfer of compressed gas)Why do gases have higher internal energy than solids and liquids, when at the same pressure?Why does the refrigerant release heat when it is compressed into a liquid?Why do gas expand when heated?













2












$begingroup$


This is an experimental observation on a chromatographic column. I am trying to reconcile two observations, one with gases and one with liquids. Assume a narrow tube packed with very small 2-3 micron particles made of silica.



When we pump solvents such as methanol/water (from the left, inlet) at high flow rates, say 5 mL/min, the back-pressure is very high ~ 500 bar. The right end of the column heats up. One can feel that outlet fluid is quite warm. The outlet of the column is at atmospheric pressure. The inlet to outlet temperature difference can be as high as 10 C. In the literature it is wrongly called frictional heating as if the fluid has warmed up by rubbing against very small silica particles. I met a specialist, he said it is the adiabatic expansion of a compressed liquid which leads to heating up and it has nothing to do with friction of the moving liquid with particles.



Now, gases can also be used as a mobile phase in the same packed column, e.g. pressurized carbon dioxide. This time the right end of the column is almost freezing, as expected. The pressurized gases are expanding and the gases cool down.



The question is why do compressed liquids warm up when they are allowed to expand, unlike gases? Thanks.












share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Are you familiar with the property of a fluid called "viscosity?"
    $endgroup$
    – Chet Miller
    6 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I am glad you didn't start with "Elementary, my dear Watson!"
    $endgroup$
    – M. Farooq
    6 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    I don’t understand. What are you saying?
    $endgroup$
    – Chet Miller
    6 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I was intrigued by the way you asked if I were familiar with the fluid property called "viscosity". Of course, everyone is. If your point is viscous heating, this is exactly what that expert was refuting. He said that the heating of the liquid has nothing to do with friction of the liquid with the particles. P.S. "Elementary, my dear Watson" is a Sherlock Holmes' dialogue to his friend Dr. Watson, when he solved a difficult case and wanted to explain it to him.
    $endgroup$
    – M. Farooq
    5 hours ago


















2












$begingroup$


This is an experimental observation on a chromatographic column. I am trying to reconcile two observations, one with gases and one with liquids. Assume a narrow tube packed with very small 2-3 micron particles made of silica.



When we pump solvents such as methanol/water (from the left, inlet) at high flow rates, say 5 mL/min, the back-pressure is very high ~ 500 bar. The right end of the column heats up. One can feel that outlet fluid is quite warm. The outlet of the column is at atmospheric pressure. The inlet to outlet temperature difference can be as high as 10 C. In the literature it is wrongly called frictional heating as if the fluid has warmed up by rubbing against very small silica particles. I met a specialist, he said it is the adiabatic expansion of a compressed liquid which leads to heating up and it has nothing to do with friction of the moving liquid with particles.



Now, gases can also be used as a mobile phase in the same packed column, e.g. pressurized carbon dioxide. This time the right end of the column is almost freezing, as expected. The pressurized gases are expanding and the gases cool down.



The question is why do compressed liquids warm up when they are allowed to expand, unlike gases? Thanks.












share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Are you familiar with the property of a fluid called "viscosity?"
    $endgroup$
    – Chet Miller
    6 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I am glad you didn't start with "Elementary, my dear Watson!"
    $endgroup$
    – M. Farooq
    6 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    I don’t understand. What are you saying?
    $endgroup$
    – Chet Miller
    6 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I was intrigued by the way you asked if I were familiar with the fluid property called "viscosity". Of course, everyone is. If your point is viscous heating, this is exactly what that expert was refuting. He said that the heating of the liquid has nothing to do with friction of the liquid with the particles. P.S. "Elementary, my dear Watson" is a Sherlock Holmes' dialogue to his friend Dr. Watson, when he solved a difficult case and wanted to explain it to him.
    $endgroup$
    – M. Farooq
    5 hours ago
















2












2








2





$begingroup$


This is an experimental observation on a chromatographic column. I am trying to reconcile two observations, one with gases and one with liquids. Assume a narrow tube packed with very small 2-3 micron particles made of silica.



When we pump solvents such as methanol/water (from the left, inlet) at high flow rates, say 5 mL/min, the back-pressure is very high ~ 500 bar. The right end of the column heats up. One can feel that outlet fluid is quite warm. The outlet of the column is at atmospheric pressure. The inlet to outlet temperature difference can be as high as 10 C. In the literature it is wrongly called frictional heating as if the fluid has warmed up by rubbing against very small silica particles. I met a specialist, he said it is the adiabatic expansion of a compressed liquid which leads to heating up and it has nothing to do with friction of the moving liquid with particles.



Now, gases can also be used as a mobile phase in the same packed column, e.g. pressurized carbon dioxide. This time the right end of the column is almost freezing, as expected. The pressurized gases are expanding and the gases cool down.



The question is why do compressed liquids warm up when they are allowed to expand, unlike gases? Thanks.












share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




This is an experimental observation on a chromatographic column. I am trying to reconcile two observations, one with gases and one with liquids. Assume a narrow tube packed with very small 2-3 micron particles made of silica.



When we pump solvents such as methanol/water (from the left, inlet) at high flow rates, say 5 mL/min, the back-pressure is very high ~ 500 bar. The right end of the column heats up. One can feel that outlet fluid is quite warm. The outlet of the column is at atmospheric pressure. The inlet to outlet temperature difference can be as high as 10 C. In the literature it is wrongly called frictional heating as if the fluid has warmed up by rubbing against very small silica particles. I met a specialist, he said it is the adiabatic expansion of a compressed liquid which leads to heating up and it has nothing to do with friction of the moving liquid with particles.



Now, gases can also be used as a mobile phase in the same packed column, e.g. pressurized carbon dioxide. This time the right end of the column is almost freezing, as expected. The pressurized gases are expanding and the gases cool down.



The question is why do compressed liquids warm up when they are allowed to expand, unlike gases? Thanks.









thermodynamics thermal-radiation






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited 8 hours ago







M. Farooq

















asked 8 hours ago









M. FarooqM. Farooq

1345




1345












  • $begingroup$
    Are you familiar with the property of a fluid called "viscosity?"
    $endgroup$
    – Chet Miller
    6 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I am glad you didn't start with "Elementary, my dear Watson!"
    $endgroup$
    – M. Farooq
    6 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    I don’t understand. What are you saying?
    $endgroup$
    – Chet Miller
    6 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I was intrigued by the way you asked if I were familiar with the fluid property called "viscosity". Of course, everyone is. If your point is viscous heating, this is exactly what that expert was refuting. He said that the heating of the liquid has nothing to do with friction of the liquid with the particles. P.S. "Elementary, my dear Watson" is a Sherlock Holmes' dialogue to his friend Dr. Watson, when he solved a difficult case and wanted to explain it to him.
    $endgroup$
    – M. Farooq
    5 hours ago




















  • $begingroup$
    Are you familiar with the property of a fluid called "viscosity?"
    $endgroup$
    – Chet Miller
    6 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I am glad you didn't start with "Elementary, my dear Watson!"
    $endgroup$
    – M. Farooq
    6 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    I don’t understand. What are you saying?
    $endgroup$
    – Chet Miller
    6 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I was intrigued by the way you asked if I were familiar with the fluid property called "viscosity". Of course, everyone is. If your point is viscous heating, this is exactly what that expert was refuting. He said that the heating of the liquid has nothing to do with friction of the liquid with the particles. P.S. "Elementary, my dear Watson" is a Sherlock Holmes' dialogue to his friend Dr. Watson, when he solved a difficult case and wanted to explain it to him.
    $endgroup$
    – M. Farooq
    5 hours ago


















$begingroup$
Are you familiar with the property of a fluid called "viscosity?"
$endgroup$
– Chet Miller
6 hours ago




$begingroup$
Are you familiar with the property of a fluid called "viscosity?"
$endgroup$
– Chet Miller
6 hours ago




1




1




$begingroup$
I am glad you didn't start with "Elementary, my dear Watson!"
$endgroup$
– M. Farooq
6 hours ago




$begingroup$
I am glad you didn't start with "Elementary, my dear Watson!"
$endgroup$
– M. Farooq
6 hours ago












$begingroup$
I don’t understand. What are you saying?
$endgroup$
– Chet Miller
6 hours ago




$begingroup$
I don’t understand. What are you saying?
$endgroup$
– Chet Miller
6 hours ago




1




1




$begingroup$
I was intrigued by the way you asked if I were familiar with the fluid property called "viscosity". Of course, everyone is. If your point is viscous heating, this is exactly what that expert was refuting. He said that the heating of the liquid has nothing to do with friction of the liquid with the particles. P.S. "Elementary, my dear Watson" is a Sherlock Holmes' dialogue to his friend Dr. Watson, when he solved a difficult case and wanted to explain it to him.
$endgroup$
– M. Farooq
5 hours ago






$begingroup$
I was intrigued by the way you asked if I were familiar with the fluid property called "viscosity". Of course, everyone is. If your point is viscous heating, this is exactly what that expert was refuting. He said that the heating of the liquid has nothing to do with friction of the liquid with the particles. P.S. "Elementary, my dear Watson" is a Sherlock Holmes' dialogue to his friend Dr. Watson, when he solved a difficult case and wanted to explain it to him.
$endgroup$
– M. Farooq
5 hours ago












2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















4












$begingroup$

I hope you weren't offended by my comment. In a forum like this, people with all different backgrounds ask questions, and I was unaware of yours.



I don't know who the "expert" was, but he was wrong. The cause of the temperature rise was indeed viscous heating. Viscous "friction" is not the same as dry friction between the liquid with the particles. It is analogous to the heating that occurs in a viscous fluid when it is stirred. The mechanical energy of stirring is dissipated by the viscous behavior of the fluid, and converted to internal energy of the fluid, which translates into a temperature rise. This is exactly how Joule demonstrated the equivalence between mechanical work and increase in internal energy.



In the case of flowing a liquid through a packed column, the mechanical energy loss associated with viscous dissipation in the fluid flow within the pore channels of the packing produces an increase in the internal energy of the exit fluid. This is also a well-known phenomenon in viscous polymer flow through processing equipment, such as transfer lines, spinnerets, and other dies. The rough rule of thumb is a 2 degree temperature rise for every 1000 psi in pressure drop.



In your packed column, application of the open system (control volume) version of the first law of thermodynamics to the flow through the column yields:
$$Delta h = CDelta T+vDelta P=0$$where h is the enthalpy per unit mass of the fluid, C is the specific heat capacity, v is the specific volume and P is the pressure. Viscosity causes the fluid pressure to decrease between the entrance and the exit of the packed bed. The corresponding viscous temperature rise of the fluid is:
$$Delta T=-frac{vDelta P}{C}$$where $Delta P$ is negative.



In the simple case of flow in a tube, the viscous flow equations are observed to accurately predict the amount of viscous dissipation and the corresponding pressure drop. And the above equation is then observed to accurately predict the temperature rise of the fluid.



In the experiments you described, there were two phenomena occurring simultaneously: expansion cooling and viscous heating. In the case of a liquid, the viscous heating wins out over the expansion cooling because a liquid is nearly incompressible, so it can't do any expansion work to cause cooling. In the case of an ideal gas, the expansion cooling exactly cancels the viscous heating, and there is no change in internal energy or temperature. In the case of a real gas, in most cases, the expansion cooling typically wins out (by a little) over the viscous heating, so there is usually a small amount of temperature decrease.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Your equation is the same as what others have derived. The Joule experiment is a nice reminder. I did that two decades ago. In ultrahigh pressure liquid chromatography, deltaP is 5000 - 10000 psi. I gather that gentleman must be wrong based on the reasoning aboe. He is a respected figure and we had a chat on this topic. He said the literature is spreading this misconception. It is just adiabatic expansion of a compressed liquid (at the outlet)- any compressed liquid will heat up if allowed to expand. Your thesis is that an expanding liquid would cool, if viscous heating were absent.
    $endgroup$
    – M. Farooq
    3 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    I agree with your point. "I hope you weren't offended by my comment. In a forum like this, people with all different backgrounds ask questions, and I was unaware of yours.". No problem. This happens in public forums where full profile cannot be shared.
    $endgroup$
    – M. Farooq
    3 hours ago



















1












$begingroup$

I work with ammonia, so I can speak to that.
The liquid gives up its heat as the pressure drops. You may see a slight spike, but the temp will go down as soon as the heat is released.



" I met a specialist, he said it is the adiabatic expansion of a compressed liquid which leads to heating up and it has nothing to do with friction of the moving liquid with particles." I think you or your expert may have been confused about this term or at least I am confused as you have to put work into the liquid to cause it to heat up. Work in this case is the compression.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$














    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "151"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphysics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f482416%2fwhy-do-compressed-liquids-heat-up-when-allowed-to-expand-unlike-gases%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    4












    $begingroup$

    I hope you weren't offended by my comment. In a forum like this, people with all different backgrounds ask questions, and I was unaware of yours.



    I don't know who the "expert" was, but he was wrong. The cause of the temperature rise was indeed viscous heating. Viscous "friction" is not the same as dry friction between the liquid with the particles. It is analogous to the heating that occurs in a viscous fluid when it is stirred. The mechanical energy of stirring is dissipated by the viscous behavior of the fluid, and converted to internal energy of the fluid, which translates into a temperature rise. This is exactly how Joule demonstrated the equivalence between mechanical work and increase in internal energy.



    In the case of flowing a liquid through a packed column, the mechanical energy loss associated with viscous dissipation in the fluid flow within the pore channels of the packing produces an increase in the internal energy of the exit fluid. This is also a well-known phenomenon in viscous polymer flow through processing equipment, such as transfer lines, spinnerets, and other dies. The rough rule of thumb is a 2 degree temperature rise for every 1000 psi in pressure drop.



    In your packed column, application of the open system (control volume) version of the first law of thermodynamics to the flow through the column yields:
    $$Delta h = CDelta T+vDelta P=0$$where h is the enthalpy per unit mass of the fluid, C is the specific heat capacity, v is the specific volume and P is the pressure. Viscosity causes the fluid pressure to decrease between the entrance and the exit of the packed bed. The corresponding viscous temperature rise of the fluid is:
    $$Delta T=-frac{vDelta P}{C}$$where $Delta P$ is negative.



    In the simple case of flow in a tube, the viscous flow equations are observed to accurately predict the amount of viscous dissipation and the corresponding pressure drop. And the above equation is then observed to accurately predict the temperature rise of the fluid.



    In the experiments you described, there were two phenomena occurring simultaneously: expansion cooling and viscous heating. In the case of a liquid, the viscous heating wins out over the expansion cooling because a liquid is nearly incompressible, so it can't do any expansion work to cause cooling. In the case of an ideal gas, the expansion cooling exactly cancels the viscous heating, and there is no change in internal energy or temperature. In the case of a real gas, in most cases, the expansion cooling typically wins out (by a little) over the viscous heating, so there is usually a small amount of temperature decrease.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      Your equation is the same as what others have derived. The Joule experiment is a nice reminder. I did that two decades ago. In ultrahigh pressure liquid chromatography, deltaP is 5000 - 10000 psi. I gather that gentleman must be wrong based on the reasoning aboe. He is a respected figure and we had a chat on this topic. He said the literature is spreading this misconception. It is just adiabatic expansion of a compressed liquid (at the outlet)- any compressed liquid will heat up if allowed to expand. Your thesis is that an expanding liquid would cool, if viscous heating were absent.
      $endgroup$
      – M. Farooq
      3 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      I agree with your point. "I hope you weren't offended by my comment. In a forum like this, people with all different backgrounds ask questions, and I was unaware of yours.". No problem. This happens in public forums where full profile cannot be shared.
      $endgroup$
      – M. Farooq
      3 hours ago
















    4












    $begingroup$

    I hope you weren't offended by my comment. In a forum like this, people with all different backgrounds ask questions, and I was unaware of yours.



    I don't know who the "expert" was, but he was wrong. The cause of the temperature rise was indeed viscous heating. Viscous "friction" is not the same as dry friction between the liquid with the particles. It is analogous to the heating that occurs in a viscous fluid when it is stirred. The mechanical energy of stirring is dissipated by the viscous behavior of the fluid, and converted to internal energy of the fluid, which translates into a temperature rise. This is exactly how Joule demonstrated the equivalence between mechanical work and increase in internal energy.



    In the case of flowing a liquid through a packed column, the mechanical energy loss associated with viscous dissipation in the fluid flow within the pore channels of the packing produces an increase in the internal energy of the exit fluid. This is also a well-known phenomenon in viscous polymer flow through processing equipment, such as transfer lines, spinnerets, and other dies. The rough rule of thumb is a 2 degree temperature rise for every 1000 psi in pressure drop.



    In your packed column, application of the open system (control volume) version of the first law of thermodynamics to the flow through the column yields:
    $$Delta h = CDelta T+vDelta P=0$$where h is the enthalpy per unit mass of the fluid, C is the specific heat capacity, v is the specific volume and P is the pressure. Viscosity causes the fluid pressure to decrease between the entrance and the exit of the packed bed. The corresponding viscous temperature rise of the fluid is:
    $$Delta T=-frac{vDelta P}{C}$$where $Delta P$ is negative.



    In the simple case of flow in a tube, the viscous flow equations are observed to accurately predict the amount of viscous dissipation and the corresponding pressure drop. And the above equation is then observed to accurately predict the temperature rise of the fluid.



    In the experiments you described, there were two phenomena occurring simultaneously: expansion cooling and viscous heating. In the case of a liquid, the viscous heating wins out over the expansion cooling because a liquid is nearly incompressible, so it can't do any expansion work to cause cooling. In the case of an ideal gas, the expansion cooling exactly cancels the viscous heating, and there is no change in internal energy or temperature. In the case of a real gas, in most cases, the expansion cooling typically wins out (by a little) over the viscous heating, so there is usually a small amount of temperature decrease.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      Your equation is the same as what others have derived. The Joule experiment is a nice reminder. I did that two decades ago. In ultrahigh pressure liquid chromatography, deltaP is 5000 - 10000 psi. I gather that gentleman must be wrong based on the reasoning aboe. He is a respected figure and we had a chat on this topic. He said the literature is spreading this misconception. It is just adiabatic expansion of a compressed liquid (at the outlet)- any compressed liquid will heat up if allowed to expand. Your thesis is that an expanding liquid would cool, if viscous heating were absent.
      $endgroup$
      – M. Farooq
      3 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      I agree with your point. "I hope you weren't offended by my comment. In a forum like this, people with all different backgrounds ask questions, and I was unaware of yours.". No problem. This happens in public forums where full profile cannot be shared.
      $endgroup$
      – M. Farooq
      3 hours ago














    4












    4








    4





    $begingroup$

    I hope you weren't offended by my comment. In a forum like this, people with all different backgrounds ask questions, and I was unaware of yours.



    I don't know who the "expert" was, but he was wrong. The cause of the temperature rise was indeed viscous heating. Viscous "friction" is not the same as dry friction between the liquid with the particles. It is analogous to the heating that occurs in a viscous fluid when it is stirred. The mechanical energy of stirring is dissipated by the viscous behavior of the fluid, and converted to internal energy of the fluid, which translates into a temperature rise. This is exactly how Joule demonstrated the equivalence between mechanical work and increase in internal energy.



    In the case of flowing a liquid through a packed column, the mechanical energy loss associated with viscous dissipation in the fluid flow within the pore channels of the packing produces an increase in the internal energy of the exit fluid. This is also a well-known phenomenon in viscous polymer flow through processing equipment, such as transfer lines, spinnerets, and other dies. The rough rule of thumb is a 2 degree temperature rise for every 1000 psi in pressure drop.



    In your packed column, application of the open system (control volume) version of the first law of thermodynamics to the flow through the column yields:
    $$Delta h = CDelta T+vDelta P=0$$where h is the enthalpy per unit mass of the fluid, C is the specific heat capacity, v is the specific volume and P is the pressure. Viscosity causes the fluid pressure to decrease between the entrance and the exit of the packed bed. The corresponding viscous temperature rise of the fluid is:
    $$Delta T=-frac{vDelta P}{C}$$where $Delta P$ is negative.



    In the simple case of flow in a tube, the viscous flow equations are observed to accurately predict the amount of viscous dissipation and the corresponding pressure drop. And the above equation is then observed to accurately predict the temperature rise of the fluid.



    In the experiments you described, there were two phenomena occurring simultaneously: expansion cooling and viscous heating. In the case of a liquid, the viscous heating wins out over the expansion cooling because a liquid is nearly incompressible, so it can't do any expansion work to cause cooling. In the case of an ideal gas, the expansion cooling exactly cancels the viscous heating, and there is no change in internal energy or temperature. In the case of a real gas, in most cases, the expansion cooling typically wins out (by a little) over the viscous heating, so there is usually a small amount of temperature decrease.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$



    I hope you weren't offended by my comment. In a forum like this, people with all different backgrounds ask questions, and I was unaware of yours.



    I don't know who the "expert" was, but he was wrong. The cause of the temperature rise was indeed viscous heating. Viscous "friction" is not the same as dry friction between the liquid with the particles. It is analogous to the heating that occurs in a viscous fluid when it is stirred. The mechanical energy of stirring is dissipated by the viscous behavior of the fluid, and converted to internal energy of the fluid, which translates into a temperature rise. This is exactly how Joule demonstrated the equivalence between mechanical work and increase in internal energy.



    In the case of flowing a liquid through a packed column, the mechanical energy loss associated with viscous dissipation in the fluid flow within the pore channels of the packing produces an increase in the internal energy of the exit fluid. This is also a well-known phenomenon in viscous polymer flow through processing equipment, such as transfer lines, spinnerets, and other dies. The rough rule of thumb is a 2 degree temperature rise for every 1000 psi in pressure drop.



    In your packed column, application of the open system (control volume) version of the first law of thermodynamics to the flow through the column yields:
    $$Delta h = CDelta T+vDelta P=0$$where h is the enthalpy per unit mass of the fluid, C is the specific heat capacity, v is the specific volume and P is the pressure. Viscosity causes the fluid pressure to decrease between the entrance and the exit of the packed bed. The corresponding viscous temperature rise of the fluid is:
    $$Delta T=-frac{vDelta P}{C}$$where $Delta P$ is negative.



    In the simple case of flow in a tube, the viscous flow equations are observed to accurately predict the amount of viscous dissipation and the corresponding pressure drop. And the above equation is then observed to accurately predict the temperature rise of the fluid.



    In the experiments you described, there were two phenomena occurring simultaneously: expansion cooling and viscous heating. In the case of a liquid, the viscous heating wins out over the expansion cooling because a liquid is nearly incompressible, so it can't do any expansion work to cause cooling. In the case of an ideal gas, the expansion cooling exactly cancels the viscous heating, and there is no change in internal energy or temperature. In the case of a real gas, in most cases, the expansion cooling typically wins out (by a little) over the viscous heating, so there is usually a small amount of temperature decrease.







    share|cite|improve this answer














    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer








    edited 4 hours ago

























    answered 5 hours ago









    Chet MillerChet Miller

    16.4k2827




    16.4k2827












    • $begingroup$
      Your equation is the same as what others have derived. The Joule experiment is a nice reminder. I did that two decades ago. In ultrahigh pressure liquid chromatography, deltaP is 5000 - 10000 psi. I gather that gentleman must be wrong based on the reasoning aboe. He is a respected figure and we had a chat on this topic. He said the literature is spreading this misconception. It is just adiabatic expansion of a compressed liquid (at the outlet)- any compressed liquid will heat up if allowed to expand. Your thesis is that an expanding liquid would cool, if viscous heating were absent.
      $endgroup$
      – M. Farooq
      3 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      I agree with your point. "I hope you weren't offended by my comment. In a forum like this, people with all different backgrounds ask questions, and I was unaware of yours.". No problem. This happens in public forums where full profile cannot be shared.
      $endgroup$
      – M. Farooq
      3 hours ago


















    • $begingroup$
      Your equation is the same as what others have derived. The Joule experiment is a nice reminder. I did that two decades ago. In ultrahigh pressure liquid chromatography, deltaP is 5000 - 10000 psi. I gather that gentleman must be wrong based on the reasoning aboe. He is a respected figure and we had a chat on this topic. He said the literature is spreading this misconception. It is just adiabatic expansion of a compressed liquid (at the outlet)- any compressed liquid will heat up if allowed to expand. Your thesis is that an expanding liquid would cool, if viscous heating were absent.
      $endgroup$
      – M. Farooq
      3 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      I agree with your point. "I hope you weren't offended by my comment. In a forum like this, people with all different backgrounds ask questions, and I was unaware of yours.". No problem. This happens in public forums where full profile cannot be shared.
      $endgroup$
      – M. Farooq
      3 hours ago
















    $begingroup$
    Your equation is the same as what others have derived. The Joule experiment is a nice reminder. I did that two decades ago. In ultrahigh pressure liquid chromatography, deltaP is 5000 - 10000 psi. I gather that gentleman must be wrong based on the reasoning aboe. He is a respected figure and we had a chat on this topic. He said the literature is spreading this misconception. It is just adiabatic expansion of a compressed liquid (at the outlet)- any compressed liquid will heat up if allowed to expand. Your thesis is that an expanding liquid would cool, if viscous heating were absent.
    $endgroup$
    – M. Farooq
    3 hours ago




    $begingroup$
    Your equation is the same as what others have derived. The Joule experiment is a nice reminder. I did that two decades ago. In ultrahigh pressure liquid chromatography, deltaP is 5000 - 10000 psi. I gather that gentleman must be wrong based on the reasoning aboe. He is a respected figure and we had a chat on this topic. He said the literature is spreading this misconception. It is just adiabatic expansion of a compressed liquid (at the outlet)- any compressed liquid will heat up if allowed to expand. Your thesis is that an expanding liquid would cool, if viscous heating were absent.
    $endgroup$
    – M. Farooq
    3 hours ago












    $begingroup$
    I agree with your point. "I hope you weren't offended by my comment. In a forum like this, people with all different backgrounds ask questions, and I was unaware of yours.". No problem. This happens in public forums where full profile cannot be shared.
    $endgroup$
    – M. Farooq
    3 hours ago




    $begingroup$
    I agree with your point. "I hope you weren't offended by my comment. In a forum like this, people with all different backgrounds ask questions, and I was unaware of yours.". No problem. This happens in public forums where full profile cannot be shared.
    $endgroup$
    – M. Farooq
    3 hours ago











    1












    $begingroup$

    I work with ammonia, so I can speak to that.
    The liquid gives up its heat as the pressure drops. You may see a slight spike, but the temp will go down as soon as the heat is released.



    " I met a specialist, he said it is the adiabatic expansion of a compressed liquid which leads to heating up and it has nothing to do with friction of the moving liquid with particles." I think you or your expert may have been confused about this term or at least I am confused as you have to put work into the liquid to cause it to heat up. Work in this case is the compression.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$


















      1












      $begingroup$

      I work with ammonia, so I can speak to that.
      The liquid gives up its heat as the pressure drops. You may see a slight spike, but the temp will go down as soon as the heat is released.



      " I met a specialist, he said it is the adiabatic expansion of a compressed liquid which leads to heating up and it has nothing to do with friction of the moving liquid with particles." I think you or your expert may have been confused about this term or at least I am confused as you have to put work into the liquid to cause it to heat up. Work in this case is the compression.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$
















        1












        1








        1





        $begingroup$

        I work with ammonia, so I can speak to that.
        The liquid gives up its heat as the pressure drops. You may see a slight spike, but the temp will go down as soon as the heat is released.



        " I met a specialist, he said it is the adiabatic expansion of a compressed liquid which leads to heating up and it has nothing to do with friction of the moving liquid with particles." I think you or your expert may have been confused about this term or at least I am confused as you have to put work into the liquid to cause it to heat up. Work in this case is the compression.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        I work with ammonia, so I can speak to that.
        The liquid gives up its heat as the pressure drops. You may see a slight spike, but the temp will go down as soon as the heat is released.



        " I met a specialist, he said it is the adiabatic expansion of a compressed liquid which leads to heating up and it has nothing to do with friction of the moving liquid with particles." I think you or your expert may have been confused about this term or at least I am confused as you have to put work into the liquid to cause it to heat up. Work in this case is the compression.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered 6 hours ago









        RickRick

        695319




        695319






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Physics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphysics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f482416%2fwhy-do-compressed-liquids-heat-up-when-allowed-to-expand-unlike-gases%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Taj Mahal Inhaltsverzeichnis Aufbau | Geschichte | 350-Jahr-Feier | Heutige Bedeutung | Siehe auch |...

            Baia Sprie Cuprins Etimologie | Istorie | Demografie | Politică și administrație | Arii naturale...

            Nicolae Petrescu-Găină Cuprins Biografie | Opera | In memoriam | Varia | Controverse, incertitudini...