Radeon GPU not found after kernel upgraded to CentOS 7.5 - “[AMD/ATI] display unclaimed”Up to date Mint...
Was Donald Trump at ground zero helping out on 9-11?
What is a good example for artistic ND filter applications?
How can I solve this sudoku?
If the Moon were impacted by a suitably sized meteor, how long would it take to impact the Earth?
Would it take any sort of amendment to make DC a state?
What force enables us to walk? Friction or normal reaction?
What is the highest achievable score in Catan
Exploiting the delay when a festival ticket is scanned
Do professors like answering questions from non-students/private citizens?
Why don't short runways use ramps for takeoff?
My employer is refusing to give me the pay that was advertised after an internal job move
PCB design using code instead of clicking a mouse?
Complaints from (junior) developers against solution architects: how can we show the benefits of our work and improve relationships?
Is it unprofessional to mention your cover letter and resume are best viewed in Chrome?
May a hotel provide accommodation for fewer people than booked?
Why tantalum for the Hayabusa bullets?
Efficiently finding furthest two nodes in a graph
"DDoouubbllee ssppeeaakk!!"
Does Ubuntu reduce battery life?
Why put copper in between battery contacts and clamps?
How can a circuit not have a neutral?
How to prevent a single-element caster from being useless against immune foes?
What clothes would flying-people wear?
Prepare a user to perform an action before proceeding to the next step
Radeon GPU not found after kernel upgraded to CentOS 7.5 - “[AMD/ATI] display unclaimed”
Up to date Mint and AMD/ATI Radeon 2600 HD MobilityHow do I extend my desktop to my 2nd monitor rather than just cloning it?Switchable graphics Intel + AMD Venus ProHow to make video driver work in Debian JessieAMD GPU Pro on Loki (Ubuntu 16.04 Kernel 4.4)After a clean installation GUI not working-AMD GPUUltraWide display not working with AMD GPU on Debian 9Discrete Graphic Card activation on hybrid laptopHow to switch drivers from radeon to amdgpu?How to fix “amdgpu dkms failed for running kernel” when installing amd gpu drivers?
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}
My system has a three monitor setup:
- Monitor 1 connected to the onboard i915 chip
- Monitor 2 & 3 connected to a Radeon RX 560 GPU
This configuration worked until I upgraded CentOS to the 3.10.0-862.2.3.el7.x86_64 kernel.
After the kernel upgrade only Monitor 1 (attached to the onboard i915 controller) is working. Monitor 2 & 3 aren't receiving a signal.
The output of lshw
shows the Radeon display as -display UNCLAIMED.
$ sudo lshw -c video
*-display
description: VGA compatible controller
product: Xeon E3-1200 v2/3rd Gen Core processor Graphics Controller
vendor: Intel Corporation
physical id: 2
bus info: pci@0000:00:02.0
version: 09
width: 64 bits
clock: 33MHz
capabilities: msi pm vga_controller bus_master cap_list rom
configuration: driver=i915 latency=0
resources: irq:38 memory:f7400000-f77fffff memory:d0000000-dfffffff ioport:f000(size=64)
*-display UNCLAIMED
description: VGA compatible controller
product: Baffin [Radeon RX 550 640SP / RX 560]
vendor: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD/ATI]
physical id: 0
bus info: pci@0000:02:00.0
version: cf
width: 64 bits
clock: 33MHz
capabilities: pm pciexpress msi vga_controller cap_list
configuration: latency=0
resources: memory:e0000000-efffffff memory:f0000000-f01fffff ioport:e000(size=256) memory:f7b00000-f7b3ffff memory:f7b40000-f7b5ffff
lspci | grep VGA
shows both the onboard GPU and the Radeon:
00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation Xeon E3-1200 v2/3rd Gen Core processor Graphics Controller (rev 09)
02:00.0 VGA compatible controller: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD/ATI] Baffin [Radeon RX 550 640SP / RX 560] (rev cf)
lsmod | grep radeon
returned nothing so I created /etc/modules-load.d/radeon.conf
to load the module at boot. The output of lsmod | grep radeon
is now:
i2c_algo_bit 13413 3 i915,amdgpu,radeon
drm_kms_helper 176920 3 i915,amdgpu,radeon
ttm 99555 2 amdgpu,radeon
drm 397988 9 ttm,i915,drm_kms_helper,amdgpu,radeon
i2c_core 63151 8 drm,i915,i2c_i801,drm_kms_helper,i2c_algo_bit,amdgpu,radeon,videodev
The radeon module now loads during the boot process but lshw
still outputs -display UNCLAIMED and the connected monitors still receive no signal.
centos drivers kernel-modules amd-graphics i915
bumped to the homepage by Community♦ 1 hour ago
This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
add a comment |
My system has a three monitor setup:
- Monitor 1 connected to the onboard i915 chip
- Monitor 2 & 3 connected to a Radeon RX 560 GPU
This configuration worked until I upgraded CentOS to the 3.10.0-862.2.3.el7.x86_64 kernel.
After the kernel upgrade only Monitor 1 (attached to the onboard i915 controller) is working. Monitor 2 & 3 aren't receiving a signal.
The output of lshw
shows the Radeon display as -display UNCLAIMED.
$ sudo lshw -c video
*-display
description: VGA compatible controller
product: Xeon E3-1200 v2/3rd Gen Core processor Graphics Controller
vendor: Intel Corporation
physical id: 2
bus info: pci@0000:00:02.0
version: 09
width: 64 bits
clock: 33MHz
capabilities: msi pm vga_controller bus_master cap_list rom
configuration: driver=i915 latency=0
resources: irq:38 memory:f7400000-f77fffff memory:d0000000-dfffffff ioport:f000(size=64)
*-display UNCLAIMED
description: VGA compatible controller
product: Baffin [Radeon RX 550 640SP / RX 560]
vendor: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD/ATI]
physical id: 0
bus info: pci@0000:02:00.0
version: cf
width: 64 bits
clock: 33MHz
capabilities: pm pciexpress msi vga_controller cap_list
configuration: latency=0
resources: memory:e0000000-efffffff memory:f0000000-f01fffff ioport:e000(size=256) memory:f7b00000-f7b3ffff memory:f7b40000-f7b5ffff
lspci | grep VGA
shows both the onboard GPU and the Radeon:
00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation Xeon E3-1200 v2/3rd Gen Core processor Graphics Controller (rev 09)
02:00.0 VGA compatible controller: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD/ATI] Baffin [Radeon RX 550 640SP / RX 560] (rev cf)
lsmod | grep radeon
returned nothing so I created /etc/modules-load.d/radeon.conf
to load the module at boot. The output of lsmod | grep radeon
is now:
i2c_algo_bit 13413 3 i915,amdgpu,radeon
drm_kms_helper 176920 3 i915,amdgpu,radeon
ttm 99555 2 amdgpu,radeon
drm 397988 9 ttm,i915,drm_kms_helper,amdgpu,radeon
i2c_core 63151 8 drm,i915,i2c_i801,drm_kms_helper,i2c_algo_bit,amdgpu,radeon,videodev
The radeon module now loads during the boot process but lshw
still outputs -display UNCLAIMED and the connected monitors still receive no signal.
centos drivers kernel-modules amd-graphics i915
bumped to the homepage by Community♦ 1 hour ago
This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
add a comment |
My system has a three monitor setup:
- Monitor 1 connected to the onboard i915 chip
- Monitor 2 & 3 connected to a Radeon RX 560 GPU
This configuration worked until I upgraded CentOS to the 3.10.0-862.2.3.el7.x86_64 kernel.
After the kernel upgrade only Monitor 1 (attached to the onboard i915 controller) is working. Monitor 2 & 3 aren't receiving a signal.
The output of lshw
shows the Radeon display as -display UNCLAIMED.
$ sudo lshw -c video
*-display
description: VGA compatible controller
product: Xeon E3-1200 v2/3rd Gen Core processor Graphics Controller
vendor: Intel Corporation
physical id: 2
bus info: pci@0000:00:02.0
version: 09
width: 64 bits
clock: 33MHz
capabilities: msi pm vga_controller bus_master cap_list rom
configuration: driver=i915 latency=0
resources: irq:38 memory:f7400000-f77fffff memory:d0000000-dfffffff ioport:f000(size=64)
*-display UNCLAIMED
description: VGA compatible controller
product: Baffin [Radeon RX 550 640SP / RX 560]
vendor: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD/ATI]
physical id: 0
bus info: pci@0000:02:00.0
version: cf
width: 64 bits
clock: 33MHz
capabilities: pm pciexpress msi vga_controller cap_list
configuration: latency=0
resources: memory:e0000000-efffffff memory:f0000000-f01fffff ioport:e000(size=256) memory:f7b00000-f7b3ffff memory:f7b40000-f7b5ffff
lspci | grep VGA
shows both the onboard GPU and the Radeon:
00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation Xeon E3-1200 v2/3rd Gen Core processor Graphics Controller (rev 09)
02:00.0 VGA compatible controller: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD/ATI] Baffin [Radeon RX 550 640SP / RX 560] (rev cf)
lsmod | grep radeon
returned nothing so I created /etc/modules-load.d/radeon.conf
to load the module at boot. The output of lsmod | grep radeon
is now:
i2c_algo_bit 13413 3 i915,amdgpu,radeon
drm_kms_helper 176920 3 i915,amdgpu,radeon
ttm 99555 2 amdgpu,radeon
drm 397988 9 ttm,i915,drm_kms_helper,amdgpu,radeon
i2c_core 63151 8 drm,i915,i2c_i801,drm_kms_helper,i2c_algo_bit,amdgpu,radeon,videodev
The radeon module now loads during the boot process but lshw
still outputs -display UNCLAIMED and the connected monitors still receive no signal.
centos drivers kernel-modules amd-graphics i915
My system has a three monitor setup:
- Monitor 1 connected to the onboard i915 chip
- Monitor 2 & 3 connected to a Radeon RX 560 GPU
This configuration worked until I upgraded CentOS to the 3.10.0-862.2.3.el7.x86_64 kernel.
After the kernel upgrade only Monitor 1 (attached to the onboard i915 controller) is working. Monitor 2 & 3 aren't receiving a signal.
The output of lshw
shows the Radeon display as -display UNCLAIMED.
$ sudo lshw -c video
*-display
description: VGA compatible controller
product: Xeon E3-1200 v2/3rd Gen Core processor Graphics Controller
vendor: Intel Corporation
physical id: 2
bus info: pci@0000:00:02.0
version: 09
width: 64 bits
clock: 33MHz
capabilities: msi pm vga_controller bus_master cap_list rom
configuration: driver=i915 latency=0
resources: irq:38 memory:f7400000-f77fffff memory:d0000000-dfffffff ioport:f000(size=64)
*-display UNCLAIMED
description: VGA compatible controller
product: Baffin [Radeon RX 550 640SP / RX 560]
vendor: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD/ATI]
physical id: 0
bus info: pci@0000:02:00.0
version: cf
width: 64 bits
clock: 33MHz
capabilities: pm pciexpress msi vga_controller cap_list
configuration: latency=0
resources: memory:e0000000-efffffff memory:f0000000-f01fffff ioport:e000(size=256) memory:f7b00000-f7b3ffff memory:f7b40000-f7b5ffff
lspci | grep VGA
shows both the onboard GPU and the Radeon:
00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation Xeon E3-1200 v2/3rd Gen Core processor Graphics Controller (rev 09)
02:00.0 VGA compatible controller: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD/ATI] Baffin [Radeon RX 550 640SP / RX 560] (rev cf)
lsmod | grep radeon
returned nothing so I created /etc/modules-load.d/radeon.conf
to load the module at boot. The output of lsmod | grep radeon
is now:
i2c_algo_bit 13413 3 i915,amdgpu,radeon
drm_kms_helper 176920 3 i915,amdgpu,radeon
ttm 99555 2 amdgpu,radeon
drm 397988 9 ttm,i915,drm_kms_helper,amdgpu,radeon
i2c_core 63151 8 drm,i915,i2c_i801,drm_kms_helper,i2c_algo_bit,amdgpu,radeon,videodev
The radeon module now loads during the boot process but lshw
still outputs -display UNCLAIMED and the connected monitors still receive no signal.
centos drivers kernel-modules amd-graphics i915
centos drivers kernel-modules amd-graphics i915
edited May 16 '18 at 4:55
Alxs
asked May 15 '18 at 9:53
AlxsAlxs
1,2861 gold badge9 silver badges27 bronze badges
1,2861 gold badge9 silver badges27 bronze badges
bumped to the homepage by Community♦ 1 hour ago
This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
bumped to the homepage by Community♦ 1 hour ago
This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
bumped to the homepage by Community♦ 1 hour ago
This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
I found the beta version (18.20-579836, released 2018-05-08) under the enterprise radeon pro sections of the main download page. It specifically boasts RHEL 7.5 support.
https://support.amd.com/en-us/download/workstation?os=Linux+x86_64#beta
It took me a while to realize that I had upgraded to CentOS 7.5, and that the old drivers explicitly state support for 7.4. During that time I had tried to go from amdgpu 17.50-511655 to 18.10-572953, but that was giving: amdgpu dkms failed for running kernel
.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "106"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f443887%2fradeon-gpu-not-found-after-kernel-upgraded-to-centos-7-5-amd-ati-display-un%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
I found the beta version (18.20-579836, released 2018-05-08) under the enterprise radeon pro sections of the main download page. It specifically boasts RHEL 7.5 support.
https://support.amd.com/en-us/download/workstation?os=Linux+x86_64#beta
It took me a while to realize that I had upgraded to CentOS 7.5, and that the old drivers explicitly state support for 7.4. During that time I had tried to go from amdgpu 17.50-511655 to 18.10-572953, but that was giving: amdgpu dkms failed for running kernel
.
add a comment |
I found the beta version (18.20-579836, released 2018-05-08) under the enterprise radeon pro sections of the main download page. It specifically boasts RHEL 7.5 support.
https://support.amd.com/en-us/download/workstation?os=Linux+x86_64#beta
It took me a while to realize that I had upgraded to CentOS 7.5, and that the old drivers explicitly state support for 7.4. During that time I had tried to go from amdgpu 17.50-511655 to 18.10-572953, but that was giving: amdgpu dkms failed for running kernel
.
add a comment |
I found the beta version (18.20-579836, released 2018-05-08) under the enterprise radeon pro sections of the main download page. It specifically boasts RHEL 7.5 support.
https://support.amd.com/en-us/download/workstation?os=Linux+x86_64#beta
It took me a while to realize that I had upgraded to CentOS 7.5, and that the old drivers explicitly state support for 7.4. During that time I had tried to go from amdgpu 17.50-511655 to 18.10-572953, but that was giving: amdgpu dkms failed for running kernel
.
I found the beta version (18.20-579836, released 2018-05-08) under the enterprise radeon pro sections of the main download page. It specifically boasts RHEL 7.5 support.
https://support.amd.com/en-us/download/workstation?os=Linux+x86_64#beta
It took me a while to realize that I had upgraded to CentOS 7.5, and that the old drivers explicitly state support for 7.4. During that time I had tried to go from amdgpu 17.50-511655 to 18.10-572953, but that was giving: amdgpu dkms failed for running kernel
.
answered Jun 11 '18 at 20:00
KevinKevin
3494 silver badges9 bronze badges
3494 silver badges9 bronze badges
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Unix & Linux Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f443887%2fradeon-gpu-not-found-after-kernel-upgraded-to-centos-7-5-amd-ati-display-un%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown