How would you identify when an object in a Lissajous orbit needs station keeping?Could JWST stay at L2...

What is the best type of paint to paint a shipping container?

Where can/should I, as a high schooler, publish a paper regarding the derivation of a formula?

Was there ever a treaty between 2 entities with significantly different translations to the detriment of one party?

Is there any way to keep a player from killing an NPC?

What would make bones be of different colors?

Round towards zero

Uri tokenizer as a simple state machine

How do proponents of Sola Scriptura address the ministry of those Apostles who authored no parts of Scripture?

I don't have the theoretical background in my PhD topic. I can't justify getting the degree

If two Lore Bards used cutting words on an ability check or attack, would they stack?

Why does Windows store Wi-Fi passwords in a reversable format?

Asymmetric table

Are the players on the same team as the DM?

How to determine car loan length as a function of how long I plan to keep a car

Handling Disruptive Student on the Autistic Spectrum

Are the A380 engines interchangeable (given they are not all equipped with reverse)?

Why in most German places is the church the tallest building?

Duplicate Files

Non-visual Computers - thoughts?

Prevent use of CNAME Record for Untrusted Domain

What verb is かまされる?

Showing that the limit of non-eigenvector goes to infinity

How do I make my image comply with the requirements of this photography competition?

Duplicate instruments in unison in an orchestra



How would you identify when an object in a Lissajous orbit needs station keeping?


Could JWST stay at L2 “forever”?Is this what station keeping maneuvers look like, or just glitches in data? (SOHO via Horizons)Did DSCOVR travel “along the stable manifold of it's future SE L1 Halo orbit” to get there?Why is DSCOVR in a Lissajous orbit? Wouldn't a halo orbit completely avoid the Sun exclusion zone?Is this what station keeping maneuvers look like, or just glitches in data? (SOHO via Horizons)






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}







8












$begingroup$


Obviously, with the international space station you need to do some station keeping when you're falling into the atmosphere. However, I saw the following image showing the Halo orbit that the Deep Space Climate Observatory is in:



Orbit of DSCOVR...



It seems like once it hits its stable exponentially unstable halo orbit, that the speed is between 0.15km/s and 0.05km/s. At what point would there be a red flag? Is there an easily calculable escape velocity for an orbit around a Lagrangian? What would scientists be looking for to alert them that they need to do corrections for such an orbit?










share|improve this question











$endgroup$





















    8












    $begingroup$


    Obviously, with the international space station you need to do some station keeping when you're falling into the atmosphere. However, I saw the following image showing the Halo orbit that the Deep Space Climate Observatory is in:



    Orbit of DSCOVR...



    It seems like once it hits its stable exponentially unstable halo orbit, that the speed is between 0.15km/s and 0.05km/s. At what point would there be a red flag? Is there an easily calculable escape velocity for an orbit around a Lagrangian? What would scientists be looking for to alert them that they need to do corrections for such an orbit?










    share|improve this question











    $endgroup$

















      8












      8








      8





      $begingroup$


      Obviously, with the international space station you need to do some station keeping when you're falling into the atmosphere. However, I saw the following image showing the Halo orbit that the Deep Space Climate Observatory is in:



      Orbit of DSCOVR...



      It seems like once it hits its stable exponentially unstable halo orbit, that the speed is between 0.15km/s and 0.05km/s. At what point would there be a red flag? Is there an easily calculable escape velocity for an orbit around a Lagrangian? What would scientists be looking for to alert them that they need to do corrections for such an orbit?










      share|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      Obviously, with the international space station you need to do some station keeping when you're falling into the atmosphere. However, I saw the following image showing the Halo orbit that the Deep Space Climate Observatory is in:



      Orbit of DSCOVR...



      It seems like once it hits its stable exponentially unstable halo orbit, that the speed is between 0.15km/s and 0.05km/s. At what point would there be a red flag? Is there an easily calculable escape velocity for an orbit around a Lagrangian? What would scientists be looking for to alert them that they need to do corrections for such an orbit?







      halo-orbit dscovr lissajous-orbit






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited yesterday







      Magic Octopus Urn

















      asked yesterday









      Magic Octopus UrnMagic Octopus Urn

      4,4301 gold badge19 silver badges61 bronze badges




      4,4301 gold badge19 silver badges61 bronze badges

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          13













          $begingroup$

          Halo orbits and their cousins Lissajous orbits (like the one DSCOVR is in) around the Sun-Earth L1 and L2 have periods of about a half-year. They are not generally stable and they want to "unwind" along what's called an unstable manifold.



          In this question I link to Roberts 2002, The SOHO Mission L1 Halo Orbit Recovery
          From the Attitude Control Anomalies of 1998. Section II describes the station keeping routine for SOHO, which is DSCOVR's neighbor.



          They keep SOHO orbiting very slightly towards Earth, a fraction of a kilometer away from its ideal orbit. Over weeks it moves farther from the halo and towards us. The exponential doubling time for the error is about two weeks.



          If they did nothing, it would spiral towards the Earth and then go off on a big orbit around the Sun.



          But SOHO and DSCOVR and the JWST (in the future) and all of these Halo orbiting spacecraft carry transponders. Earth beams a signal to the satellite and it shift the frequency in a special, coherent way, and turns it around and sends it right back to Earth live.



          Earth can measure the speed and distance in this direction, and detect even millimeters per second errors in the velocity, as you can see by reading that section. Earth then calculates the required station-keeping burn and initiates it for the satellite. These are typically delta-v's of centimeters per second, and done every few weeks.



          Since the error grows exponentially (these orbits are said to be exponentially unstable) the more frequently you can do this, the less delta-v per year you need. In this answer I mention that the JWST's station-keeping budget is about 2.4 m/sec per year. That's really small!



          All of this is possible only because of the precise delay-doppler measurements made using the Deep Space Network dish antennas and a coherent transponder on the spacecraft.



          For more about DSOVR's orbit, see:




          • Did DSCOVR travel “along the stable manifold of it's future SE L1 Halo orbit” to get there?

          • Why is DSCOVR in a Lissajous orbit? Wouldn't a halo orbit completely avoid the Sun exclusion zone?


          The second one links to Lissajous Orbit Control for the Deep Space Climate Observatory Sun-Earth L1 Libration Point Mission






          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$















          • $begingroup$
            Usually I don't accept immediately, but this I will. I'll need to reread this when I actually get home and read some of those sources. I want to understand more about how that transponder functions.
            $endgroup$
            – Magic Octopus Urn
            yesterday






          • 2




            $begingroup$
            @MagicOctopusUrn it's not a simple concept. Thanks but I'd recommend that you un-accept and wait for me to find some appropriate image(s) that show this clearly, and possibly one or two more sources, and until you have a chance to read through. We don't want other users to get the idea that it's okay to accept answers that look and sound good. We should only accept when we are completely satisfied and the post has answered our question to our satisfaction. Accepting quickly can also dis-incentivize other and potentially better answers/
            $endgroup$
            – uhoh
            yesterday
















          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "508"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fspace.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f38337%2fhow-would-you-identify-when-an-object-in-a-lissajous-orbit-needs-station-keeping%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          13













          $begingroup$

          Halo orbits and their cousins Lissajous orbits (like the one DSCOVR is in) around the Sun-Earth L1 and L2 have periods of about a half-year. They are not generally stable and they want to "unwind" along what's called an unstable manifold.



          In this question I link to Roberts 2002, The SOHO Mission L1 Halo Orbit Recovery
          From the Attitude Control Anomalies of 1998. Section II describes the station keeping routine for SOHO, which is DSCOVR's neighbor.



          They keep SOHO orbiting very slightly towards Earth, a fraction of a kilometer away from its ideal orbit. Over weeks it moves farther from the halo and towards us. The exponential doubling time for the error is about two weeks.



          If they did nothing, it would spiral towards the Earth and then go off on a big orbit around the Sun.



          But SOHO and DSCOVR and the JWST (in the future) and all of these Halo orbiting spacecraft carry transponders. Earth beams a signal to the satellite and it shift the frequency in a special, coherent way, and turns it around and sends it right back to Earth live.



          Earth can measure the speed and distance in this direction, and detect even millimeters per second errors in the velocity, as you can see by reading that section. Earth then calculates the required station-keeping burn and initiates it for the satellite. These are typically delta-v's of centimeters per second, and done every few weeks.



          Since the error grows exponentially (these orbits are said to be exponentially unstable) the more frequently you can do this, the less delta-v per year you need. In this answer I mention that the JWST's station-keeping budget is about 2.4 m/sec per year. That's really small!



          All of this is possible only because of the precise delay-doppler measurements made using the Deep Space Network dish antennas and a coherent transponder on the spacecraft.



          For more about DSOVR's orbit, see:




          • Did DSCOVR travel “along the stable manifold of it's future SE L1 Halo orbit” to get there?

          • Why is DSCOVR in a Lissajous orbit? Wouldn't a halo orbit completely avoid the Sun exclusion zone?


          The second one links to Lissajous Orbit Control for the Deep Space Climate Observatory Sun-Earth L1 Libration Point Mission






          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$















          • $begingroup$
            Usually I don't accept immediately, but this I will. I'll need to reread this when I actually get home and read some of those sources. I want to understand more about how that transponder functions.
            $endgroup$
            – Magic Octopus Urn
            yesterday






          • 2




            $begingroup$
            @MagicOctopusUrn it's not a simple concept. Thanks but I'd recommend that you un-accept and wait for me to find some appropriate image(s) that show this clearly, and possibly one or two more sources, and until you have a chance to read through. We don't want other users to get the idea that it's okay to accept answers that look and sound good. We should only accept when we are completely satisfied and the post has answered our question to our satisfaction. Accepting quickly can also dis-incentivize other and potentially better answers/
            $endgroup$
            – uhoh
            yesterday


















          13













          $begingroup$

          Halo orbits and their cousins Lissajous orbits (like the one DSCOVR is in) around the Sun-Earth L1 and L2 have periods of about a half-year. They are not generally stable and they want to "unwind" along what's called an unstable manifold.



          In this question I link to Roberts 2002, The SOHO Mission L1 Halo Orbit Recovery
          From the Attitude Control Anomalies of 1998. Section II describes the station keeping routine for SOHO, which is DSCOVR's neighbor.



          They keep SOHO orbiting very slightly towards Earth, a fraction of a kilometer away from its ideal orbit. Over weeks it moves farther from the halo and towards us. The exponential doubling time for the error is about two weeks.



          If they did nothing, it would spiral towards the Earth and then go off on a big orbit around the Sun.



          But SOHO and DSCOVR and the JWST (in the future) and all of these Halo orbiting spacecraft carry transponders. Earth beams a signal to the satellite and it shift the frequency in a special, coherent way, and turns it around and sends it right back to Earth live.



          Earth can measure the speed and distance in this direction, and detect even millimeters per second errors in the velocity, as you can see by reading that section. Earth then calculates the required station-keeping burn and initiates it for the satellite. These are typically delta-v's of centimeters per second, and done every few weeks.



          Since the error grows exponentially (these orbits are said to be exponentially unstable) the more frequently you can do this, the less delta-v per year you need. In this answer I mention that the JWST's station-keeping budget is about 2.4 m/sec per year. That's really small!



          All of this is possible only because of the precise delay-doppler measurements made using the Deep Space Network dish antennas and a coherent transponder on the spacecraft.



          For more about DSOVR's orbit, see:




          • Did DSCOVR travel “along the stable manifold of it's future SE L1 Halo orbit” to get there?

          • Why is DSCOVR in a Lissajous orbit? Wouldn't a halo orbit completely avoid the Sun exclusion zone?


          The second one links to Lissajous Orbit Control for the Deep Space Climate Observatory Sun-Earth L1 Libration Point Mission






          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$















          • $begingroup$
            Usually I don't accept immediately, but this I will. I'll need to reread this when I actually get home and read some of those sources. I want to understand more about how that transponder functions.
            $endgroup$
            – Magic Octopus Urn
            yesterday






          • 2




            $begingroup$
            @MagicOctopusUrn it's not a simple concept. Thanks but I'd recommend that you un-accept and wait for me to find some appropriate image(s) that show this clearly, and possibly one or two more sources, and until you have a chance to read through. We don't want other users to get the idea that it's okay to accept answers that look and sound good. We should only accept when we are completely satisfied and the post has answered our question to our satisfaction. Accepting quickly can also dis-incentivize other and potentially better answers/
            $endgroup$
            – uhoh
            yesterday
















          13














          13










          13







          $begingroup$

          Halo orbits and their cousins Lissajous orbits (like the one DSCOVR is in) around the Sun-Earth L1 and L2 have periods of about a half-year. They are not generally stable and they want to "unwind" along what's called an unstable manifold.



          In this question I link to Roberts 2002, The SOHO Mission L1 Halo Orbit Recovery
          From the Attitude Control Anomalies of 1998. Section II describes the station keeping routine for SOHO, which is DSCOVR's neighbor.



          They keep SOHO orbiting very slightly towards Earth, a fraction of a kilometer away from its ideal orbit. Over weeks it moves farther from the halo and towards us. The exponential doubling time for the error is about two weeks.



          If they did nothing, it would spiral towards the Earth and then go off on a big orbit around the Sun.



          But SOHO and DSCOVR and the JWST (in the future) and all of these Halo orbiting spacecraft carry transponders. Earth beams a signal to the satellite and it shift the frequency in a special, coherent way, and turns it around and sends it right back to Earth live.



          Earth can measure the speed and distance in this direction, and detect even millimeters per second errors in the velocity, as you can see by reading that section. Earth then calculates the required station-keeping burn and initiates it for the satellite. These are typically delta-v's of centimeters per second, and done every few weeks.



          Since the error grows exponentially (these orbits are said to be exponentially unstable) the more frequently you can do this, the less delta-v per year you need. In this answer I mention that the JWST's station-keeping budget is about 2.4 m/sec per year. That's really small!



          All of this is possible only because of the precise delay-doppler measurements made using the Deep Space Network dish antennas and a coherent transponder on the spacecraft.



          For more about DSOVR's orbit, see:




          • Did DSCOVR travel “along the stable manifold of it's future SE L1 Halo orbit” to get there?

          • Why is DSCOVR in a Lissajous orbit? Wouldn't a halo orbit completely avoid the Sun exclusion zone?


          The second one links to Lissajous Orbit Control for the Deep Space Climate Observatory Sun-Earth L1 Libration Point Mission






          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          Halo orbits and their cousins Lissajous orbits (like the one DSCOVR is in) around the Sun-Earth L1 and L2 have periods of about a half-year. They are not generally stable and they want to "unwind" along what's called an unstable manifold.



          In this question I link to Roberts 2002, The SOHO Mission L1 Halo Orbit Recovery
          From the Attitude Control Anomalies of 1998. Section II describes the station keeping routine for SOHO, which is DSCOVR's neighbor.



          They keep SOHO orbiting very slightly towards Earth, a fraction of a kilometer away from its ideal orbit. Over weeks it moves farther from the halo and towards us. The exponential doubling time for the error is about two weeks.



          If they did nothing, it would spiral towards the Earth and then go off on a big orbit around the Sun.



          But SOHO and DSCOVR and the JWST (in the future) and all of these Halo orbiting spacecraft carry transponders. Earth beams a signal to the satellite and it shift the frequency in a special, coherent way, and turns it around and sends it right back to Earth live.



          Earth can measure the speed and distance in this direction, and detect even millimeters per second errors in the velocity, as you can see by reading that section. Earth then calculates the required station-keeping burn and initiates it for the satellite. These are typically delta-v's of centimeters per second, and done every few weeks.



          Since the error grows exponentially (these orbits are said to be exponentially unstable) the more frequently you can do this, the less delta-v per year you need. In this answer I mention that the JWST's station-keeping budget is about 2.4 m/sec per year. That's really small!



          All of this is possible only because of the precise delay-doppler measurements made using the Deep Space Network dish antennas and a coherent transponder on the spacecraft.



          For more about DSOVR's orbit, see:




          • Did DSCOVR travel “along the stable manifold of it's future SE L1 Halo orbit” to get there?

          • Why is DSCOVR in a Lissajous orbit? Wouldn't a halo orbit completely avoid the Sun exclusion zone?


          The second one links to Lissajous Orbit Control for the Deep Space Climate Observatory Sun-Earth L1 Libration Point Mission







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered yesterday









          uhohuhoh

          50.7k23 gold badges200 silver badges655 bronze badges




          50.7k23 gold badges200 silver badges655 bronze badges















          • $begingroup$
            Usually I don't accept immediately, but this I will. I'll need to reread this when I actually get home and read some of those sources. I want to understand more about how that transponder functions.
            $endgroup$
            – Magic Octopus Urn
            yesterday






          • 2




            $begingroup$
            @MagicOctopusUrn it's not a simple concept. Thanks but I'd recommend that you un-accept and wait for me to find some appropriate image(s) that show this clearly, and possibly one or two more sources, and until you have a chance to read through. We don't want other users to get the idea that it's okay to accept answers that look and sound good. We should only accept when we are completely satisfied and the post has answered our question to our satisfaction. Accepting quickly can also dis-incentivize other and potentially better answers/
            $endgroup$
            – uhoh
            yesterday




















          • $begingroup$
            Usually I don't accept immediately, but this I will. I'll need to reread this when I actually get home and read some of those sources. I want to understand more about how that transponder functions.
            $endgroup$
            – Magic Octopus Urn
            yesterday






          • 2




            $begingroup$
            @MagicOctopusUrn it's not a simple concept. Thanks but I'd recommend that you un-accept and wait for me to find some appropriate image(s) that show this clearly, and possibly one or two more sources, and until you have a chance to read through. We don't want other users to get the idea that it's okay to accept answers that look and sound good. We should only accept when we are completely satisfied and the post has answered our question to our satisfaction. Accepting quickly can also dis-incentivize other and potentially better answers/
            $endgroup$
            – uhoh
            yesterday


















          $begingroup$
          Usually I don't accept immediately, but this I will. I'll need to reread this when I actually get home and read some of those sources. I want to understand more about how that transponder functions.
          $endgroup$
          – Magic Octopus Urn
          yesterday




          $begingroup$
          Usually I don't accept immediately, but this I will. I'll need to reread this when I actually get home and read some of those sources. I want to understand more about how that transponder functions.
          $endgroup$
          – Magic Octopus Urn
          yesterday




          2




          2




          $begingroup$
          @MagicOctopusUrn it's not a simple concept. Thanks but I'd recommend that you un-accept and wait for me to find some appropriate image(s) that show this clearly, and possibly one or two more sources, and until you have a chance to read through. We don't want other users to get the idea that it's okay to accept answers that look and sound good. We should only accept when we are completely satisfied and the post has answered our question to our satisfaction. Accepting quickly can also dis-incentivize other and potentially better answers/
          $endgroup$
          – uhoh
          yesterday






          $begingroup$
          @MagicOctopusUrn it's not a simple concept. Thanks but I'd recommend that you un-accept and wait for me to find some appropriate image(s) that show this clearly, and possibly one or two more sources, and until you have a chance to read through. We don't want other users to get the idea that it's okay to accept answers that look and sound good. We should only accept when we are completely satisfied and the post has answered our question to our satisfaction. Accepting quickly can also dis-incentivize other and potentially better answers/
          $endgroup$
          – uhoh
          yesterday




















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Space Exploration Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fspace.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f38337%2fhow-would-you-identify-when-an-object-in-a-lissajous-orbit-needs-station-keeping%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Taj Mahal Inhaltsverzeichnis Aufbau | Geschichte | 350-Jahr-Feier | Heutige Bedeutung | Siehe auch |...

          Baia Sprie Cuprins Etimologie | Istorie | Demografie | Politică și administrație | Arii naturale...

          Nicolae Petrescu-Găină Cuprins Biografie | Opera | In memoriam | Varia | Controverse, incertitudini...