Need help to understand the integral rules used solving the convolution of two functionsCan someone...

LGPL HDL in larger FPGA design

Owner keeps cutting corners and poaching workers for his other company

Can you mark a new target with the Hunter's Mark spell if the original target shifts to a different plane?

Leaving the USA for 10 yrs when you have asylum

I need to know information from an old German birth certificate

Are personality traits, ideals, bonds, and flaws required?

How should Thaumaturgy's "three times as loud as normal" be interpreted?

How can I finish my PhD?

Why is it that I have to play this note on the piano as A sharp?

Aftermarket seats

Bit floating sequence

Are programming languages necessary/useful for operations research practitioner?

How to calculate the proper layer height multiples?

What makes things real?

How strong is aircraft-grade spruce?

How to set any file manager in Linux to show the duration like the Length feature in Windows Explorer?

Do you need to burn fuel between gravity assists?

Methods and Feasibility of Antimatter Mining?

How do Scrum teams manage their dependencies on other teams?

Supervisor wants me to support a diploma-thesis software tool after I graduated

What makes an ending "happy"?

Equilibrium points of bounce/instanton solution after Wick's rotation

RANK used in 'where' returns invalid column, but exists in results set

Why is the the worst case for this function O(n*n)



Need help to understand the integral rules used solving the convolution of two functions


Can someone intuitively explain what the convolution integral is?difference between convolution of two densities and mixture density?Integral of repeated convolution of the unit step functionApproximating convolution of two functions with Oh notationHow to get limit on integration for a convolution of two density functionsConvolution of two piecewise functionsDoubt on the Convolution of two piecewise functionsShow that convolution of two $L^1(mathbb{R})$ functions is continuous






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}







4












$begingroup$


I am teaching myself how convolution works, there's a question which looks like this - find the convolution of the following two functions $f$ and $g$.



graphics of f and g



I understand the problem intuitively that the resulting function should be essentially the product of $f$ sweeping over $g$, and since the functions are quite simple, I can find key points like when $x = 0, 1, 2, 3$ and interpolate the graph of the resulting function easily.



While reading through the "solution" of this problem in my textbook, for the intersection of $0 le x lt 1$, the author wrote this: for $0leq x<1$,
$$int_{-infty}^{infty} g(t)cdot f(x-t)dt=int_{0}^x 2tcdot dt=frac{x^2}{2}cdot 2.$$
which I'm having trouble to understand. How exactly did he replace the $infty$ and $-infty$ with $0$ and $x$, and how exactly did he turn the whole $g(t) cdot f(x-t)$ into $2t$?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$





















    4












    $begingroup$


    I am teaching myself how convolution works, there's a question which looks like this - find the convolution of the following two functions $f$ and $g$.



    graphics of f and g



    I understand the problem intuitively that the resulting function should be essentially the product of $f$ sweeping over $g$, and since the functions are quite simple, I can find key points like when $x = 0, 1, 2, 3$ and interpolate the graph of the resulting function easily.



    While reading through the "solution" of this problem in my textbook, for the intersection of $0 le x lt 1$, the author wrote this: for $0leq x<1$,
    $$int_{-infty}^{infty} g(t)cdot f(x-t)dt=int_{0}^x 2tcdot dt=frac{x^2}{2}cdot 2.$$
    which I'm having trouble to understand. How exactly did he replace the $infty$ and $-infty$ with $0$ and $x$, and how exactly did he turn the whole $g(t) cdot f(x-t)$ into $2t$?










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$

















      4












      4








      4


      1



      $begingroup$


      I am teaching myself how convolution works, there's a question which looks like this - find the convolution of the following two functions $f$ and $g$.



      graphics of f and g



      I understand the problem intuitively that the resulting function should be essentially the product of $f$ sweeping over $g$, and since the functions are quite simple, I can find key points like when $x = 0, 1, 2, 3$ and interpolate the graph of the resulting function easily.



      While reading through the "solution" of this problem in my textbook, for the intersection of $0 le x lt 1$, the author wrote this: for $0leq x<1$,
      $$int_{-infty}^{infty} g(t)cdot f(x-t)dt=int_{0}^x 2tcdot dt=frac{x^2}{2}cdot 2.$$
      which I'm having trouble to understand. How exactly did he replace the $infty$ and $-infty$ with $0$ and $x$, and how exactly did he turn the whole $g(t) cdot f(x-t)$ into $2t$?










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      I am teaching myself how convolution works, there's a question which looks like this - find the convolution of the following two functions $f$ and $g$.



      graphics of f and g



      I understand the problem intuitively that the resulting function should be essentially the product of $f$ sweeping over $g$, and since the functions are quite simple, I can find key points like when $x = 0, 1, 2, 3$ and interpolate the graph of the resulting function easily.



      While reading through the "solution" of this problem in my textbook, for the intersection of $0 le x lt 1$, the author wrote this: for $0leq x<1$,
      $$int_{-infty}^{infty} g(t)cdot f(x-t)dt=int_{0}^x 2tcdot dt=frac{x^2}{2}cdot 2.$$
      which I'm having trouble to understand. How exactly did he replace the $infty$ and $-infty$ with $0$ and $x$, and how exactly did he turn the whole $g(t) cdot f(x-t)$ into $2t$?







      integration convolution






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited 8 hours ago









      Robert Z

      112k10 gold badges79 silver badges153 bronze badges




      112k10 gold badges79 silver badges153 bronze badges










      asked 8 hours ago









      maranicmaranic

      374 bronze badges




      374 bronze badges

























          3 Answers
          3






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          4














          $begingroup$

          Hint. Note that $f(x-t)=2$ when $0leq x-tleq 1$, i.e. $x-1leq tleq x$, otherwise it is zero. Hence
          $$int_{-infty}^{infty} g(t)f(x-t)dt=int_{x-1}^x g(t)2 dt.$$
          Now if $xin[0,1)$ then what is $g(t)$ for $tin [x-1,0]$? And for $tin [0,x]$?






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$















          • $begingroup$
            So let me think out loud - if $x in [0,1)$ then $g(t) = t$ for the positive part $t in [0,x)$, but $0$ for the negative part $t in [x-1, 0)$, and we can write that in two parts because $0$ must be inside $[x-1, x]$. So it makes sense to break $int_{x-1}^{x} g(t) 2dt$ into two parts - $int_{x-1}^{0} g(t) 2dt$ and $int_{0}^{x} g(t) 2dt$, where the first part is simply $0$, no matter what $x$ we choose. Hence our original integral is now $int_{0}^{x} g(t) 2dt$ which is actually $int_{0}^{x} tcdot 2dt$ due to $g(t) = t$ for the positive part. Is my reasoning correct? :D
            $endgroup$
            – maranic
            8 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            @maranic It's perfect!
            $endgroup$
            – Robert Z
            7 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            It was quite tough to wrap my head around this, because we are dealing with 2 variables here. :D
            $endgroup$
            – maranic
            7 hours ago



















          1














          $begingroup$

          Observe that integrand $g(t)f(x-t)$ (where $x$ is fixed and $t$ is ranging over $mathbb R$) takes value $0$ for every $tnotin[0,x]$.



          This justifies to replace $int_{-infty}^{infty}cdots$ by $int_0^xcdots$.



          Further for any fixed $xin[0,1)$ it is true that $g(t)f(x-t)=t2$ on interval $[0,x]$.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$























            1














            $begingroup$

            I'm assuming



            $$
            f(x)=begin{cases} 2 & xin [0,1] \ 0 & else end{cases}
            $$



            And



            $$
            g(x)=begin{cases} x & xin [0,1] \ 2-x & xin [1,2)\ 1 & xin [2,3] \0 & else end{cases}
            $$



            Adding this together, we see
            $$
            int_{-infty}^{infty} g(t)f(x-t)textrm{d}t=2int_{1-x}^x g(t)textrm{d}t,
            $$

            since for these values of $t,$ $f(x-t)=2$ and for all other values of $t$, $f(x-t)$ is $0$.



            Now, $g(t)=0$ for $tleq 0$ so
            $$
            2int_{1-x}^x g(t)textrm{d}t=2int_0^x g(t)textrm{d}t=2int_0^x ttextrm{d}t,
            $$

            simply by plugging into the definition of $g$.






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$















            • $begingroup$
              You're correct.
              $endgroup$
              – WoolierThanThou
              8 hours ago














            Your Answer








            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/"u003ecc by-sa 4.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });















            draft saved

            draft discarded
















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3348258%2fneed-help-to-understand-the-integral-rules-used-solving-the-convolution-of-two-f%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            3 Answers
            3






            active

            oldest

            votes








            3 Answers
            3






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            4














            $begingroup$

            Hint. Note that $f(x-t)=2$ when $0leq x-tleq 1$, i.e. $x-1leq tleq x$, otherwise it is zero. Hence
            $$int_{-infty}^{infty} g(t)f(x-t)dt=int_{x-1}^x g(t)2 dt.$$
            Now if $xin[0,1)$ then what is $g(t)$ for $tin [x-1,0]$? And for $tin [0,x]$?






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$















            • $begingroup$
              So let me think out loud - if $x in [0,1)$ then $g(t) = t$ for the positive part $t in [0,x)$, but $0$ for the negative part $t in [x-1, 0)$, and we can write that in two parts because $0$ must be inside $[x-1, x]$. So it makes sense to break $int_{x-1}^{x} g(t) 2dt$ into two parts - $int_{x-1}^{0} g(t) 2dt$ and $int_{0}^{x} g(t) 2dt$, where the first part is simply $0$, no matter what $x$ we choose. Hence our original integral is now $int_{0}^{x} g(t) 2dt$ which is actually $int_{0}^{x} tcdot 2dt$ due to $g(t) = t$ for the positive part. Is my reasoning correct? :D
              $endgroup$
              – maranic
              8 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              @maranic It's perfect!
              $endgroup$
              – Robert Z
              7 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              It was quite tough to wrap my head around this, because we are dealing with 2 variables here. :D
              $endgroup$
              – maranic
              7 hours ago
















            4














            $begingroup$

            Hint. Note that $f(x-t)=2$ when $0leq x-tleq 1$, i.e. $x-1leq tleq x$, otherwise it is zero. Hence
            $$int_{-infty}^{infty} g(t)f(x-t)dt=int_{x-1}^x g(t)2 dt.$$
            Now if $xin[0,1)$ then what is $g(t)$ for $tin [x-1,0]$? And for $tin [0,x]$?






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$















            • $begingroup$
              So let me think out loud - if $x in [0,1)$ then $g(t) = t$ for the positive part $t in [0,x)$, but $0$ for the negative part $t in [x-1, 0)$, and we can write that in two parts because $0$ must be inside $[x-1, x]$. So it makes sense to break $int_{x-1}^{x} g(t) 2dt$ into two parts - $int_{x-1}^{0} g(t) 2dt$ and $int_{0}^{x} g(t) 2dt$, where the first part is simply $0$, no matter what $x$ we choose. Hence our original integral is now $int_{0}^{x} g(t) 2dt$ which is actually $int_{0}^{x} tcdot 2dt$ due to $g(t) = t$ for the positive part. Is my reasoning correct? :D
              $endgroup$
              – maranic
              8 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              @maranic It's perfect!
              $endgroup$
              – Robert Z
              7 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              It was quite tough to wrap my head around this, because we are dealing with 2 variables here. :D
              $endgroup$
              – maranic
              7 hours ago














            4














            4










            4







            $begingroup$

            Hint. Note that $f(x-t)=2$ when $0leq x-tleq 1$, i.e. $x-1leq tleq x$, otherwise it is zero. Hence
            $$int_{-infty}^{infty} g(t)f(x-t)dt=int_{x-1}^x g(t)2 dt.$$
            Now if $xin[0,1)$ then what is $g(t)$ for $tin [x-1,0]$? And for $tin [0,x]$?






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$



            Hint. Note that $f(x-t)=2$ when $0leq x-tleq 1$, i.e. $x-1leq tleq x$, otherwise it is zero. Hence
            $$int_{-infty}^{infty} g(t)f(x-t)dt=int_{x-1}^x g(t)2 dt.$$
            Now if $xin[0,1)$ then what is $g(t)$ for $tin [x-1,0]$? And for $tin [0,x]$?







            share|cite|improve this answer














            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer








            edited 8 hours ago

























            answered 8 hours ago









            Robert ZRobert Z

            112k10 gold badges79 silver badges153 bronze badges




            112k10 gold badges79 silver badges153 bronze badges















            • $begingroup$
              So let me think out loud - if $x in [0,1)$ then $g(t) = t$ for the positive part $t in [0,x)$, but $0$ for the negative part $t in [x-1, 0)$, and we can write that in two parts because $0$ must be inside $[x-1, x]$. So it makes sense to break $int_{x-1}^{x} g(t) 2dt$ into two parts - $int_{x-1}^{0} g(t) 2dt$ and $int_{0}^{x} g(t) 2dt$, where the first part is simply $0$, no matter what $x$ we choose. Hence our original integral is now $int_{0}^{x} g(t) 2dt$ which is actually $int_{0}^{x} tcdot 2dt$ due to $g(t) = t$ for the positive part. Is my reasoning correct? :D
              $endgroup$
              – maranic
              8 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              @maranic It's perfect!
              $endgroup$
              – Robert Z
              7 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              It was quite tough to wrap my head around this, because we are dealing with 2 variables here. :D
              $endgroup$
              – maranic
              7 hours ago


















            • $begingroup$
              So let me think out loud - if $x in [0,1)$ then $g(t) = t$ for the positive part $t in [0,x)$, but $0$ for the negative part $t in [x-1, 0)$, and we can write that in two parts because $0$ must be inside $[x-1, x]$. So it makes sense to break $int_{x-1}^{x} g(t) 2dt$ into two parts - $int_{x-1}^{0} g(t) 2dt$ and $int_{0}^{x} g(t) 2dt$, where the first part is simply $0$, no matter what $x$ we choose. Hence our original integral is now $int_{0}^{x} g(t) 2dt$ which is actually $int_{0}^{x} tcdot 2dt$ due to $g(t) = t$ for the positive part. Is my reasoning correct? :D
              $endgroup$
              – maranic
              8 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              @maranic It's perfect!
              $endgroup$
              – Robert Z
              7 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              It was quite tough to wrap my head around this, because we are dealing with 2 variables here. :D
              $endgroup$
              – maranic
              7 hours ago
















            $begingroup$
            So let me think out loud - if $x in [0,1)$ then $g(t) = t$ for the positive part $t in [0,x)$, but $0$ for the negative part $t in [x-1, 0)$, and we can write that in two parts because $0$ must be inside $[x-1, x]$. So it makes sense to break $int_{x-1}^{x} g(t) 2dt$ into two parts - $int_{x-1}^{0} g(t) 2dt$ and $int_{0}^{x} g(t) 2dt$, where the first part is simply $0$, no matter what $x$ we choose. Hence our original integral is now $int_{0}^{x} g(t) 2dt$ which is actually $int_{0}^{x} tcdot 2dt$ due to $g(t) = t$ for the positive part. Is my reasoning correct? :D
            $endgroup$
            – maranic
            8 hours ago




            $begingroup$
            So let me think out loud - if $x in [0,1)$ then $g(t) = t$ for the positive part $t in [0,x)$, but $0$ for the negative part $t in [x-1, 0)$, and we can write that in two parts because $0$ must be inside $[x-1, x]$. So it makes sense to break $int_{x-1}^{x} g(t) 2dt$ into two parts - $int_{x-1}^{0} g(t) 2dt$ and $int_{0}^{x} g(t) 2dt$, where the first part is simply $0$, no matter what $x$ we choose. Hence our original integral is now $int_{0}^{x} g(t) 2dt$ which is actually $int_{0}^{x} tcdot 2dt$ due to $g(t) = t$ for the positive part. Is my reasoning correct? :D
            $endgroup$
            – maranic
            8 hours ago












            $begingroup$
            @maranic It's perfect!
            $endgroup$
            – Robert Z
            7 hours ago




            $begingroup$
            @maranic It's perfect!
            $endgroup$
            – Robert Z
            7 hours ago












            $begingroup$
            It was quite tough to wrap my head around this, because we are dealing with 2 variables here. :D
            $endgroup$
            – maranic
            7 hours ago




            $begingroup$
            It was quite tough to wrap my head around this, because we are dealing with 2 variables here. :D
            $endgroup$
            – maranic
            7 hours ago













            1














            $begingroup$

            Observe that integrand $g(t)f(x-t)$ (where $x$ is fixed and $t$ is ranging over $mathbb R$) takes value $0$ for every $tnotin[0,x]$.



            This justifies to replace $int_{-infty}^{infty}cdots$ by $int_0^xcdots$.



            Further for any fixed $xin[0,1)$ it is true that $g(t)f(x-t)=t2$ on interval $[0,x]$.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$




















              1














              $begingroup$

              Observe that integrand $g(t)f(x-t)$ (where $x$ is fixed and $t$ is ranging over $mathbb R$) takes value $0$ for every $tnotin[0,x]$.



              This justifies to replace $int_{-infty}^{infty}cdots$ by $int_0^xcdots$.



              Further for any fixed $xin[0,1)$ it is true that $g(t)f(x-t)=t2$ on interval $[0,x]$.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$


















                1














                1










                1







                $begingroup$

                Observe that integrand $g(t)f(x-t)$ (where $x$ is fixed and $t$ is ranging over $mathbb R$) takes value $0$ for every $tnotin[0,x]$.



                This justifies to replace $int_{-infty}^{infty}cdots$ by $int_0^xcdots$.



                Further for any fixed $xin[0,1)$ it is true that $g(t)f(x-t)=t2$ on interval $[0,x]$.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$



                Observe that integrand $g(t)f(x-t)$ (where $x$ is fixed and $t$ is ranging over $mathbb R$) takes value $0$ for every $tnotin[0,x]$.



                This justifies to replace $int_{-infty}^{infty}cdots$ by $int_0^xcdots$.



                Further for any fixed $xin[0,1)$ it is true that $g(t)f(x-t)=t2$ on interval $[0,x]$.







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered 8 hours ago









                drhabdrhab

                113k5 gold badges49 silver badges141 bronze badges




                113k5 gold badges49 silver badges141 bronze badges


























                    1














                    $begingroup$

                    I'm assuming



                    $$
                    f(x)=begin{cases} 2 & xin [0,1] \ 0 & else end{cases}
                    $$



                    And



                    $$
                    g(x)=begin{cases} x & xin [0,1] \ 2-x & xin [1,2)\ 1 & xin [2,3] \0 & else end{cases}
                    $$



                    Adding this together, we see
                    $$
                    int_{-infty}^{infty} g(t)f(x-t)textrm{d}t=2int_{1-x}^x g(t)textrm{d}t,
                    $$

                    since for these values of $t,$ $f(x-t)=2$ and for all other values of $t$, $f(x-t)$ is $0$.



                    Now, $g(t)=0$ for $tleq 0$ so
                    $$
                    2int_{1-x}^x g(t)textrm{d}t=2int_0^x g(t)textrm{d}t=2int_0^x ttextrm{d}t,
                    $$

                    simply by plugging into the definition of $g$.






                    share|cite|improve this answer











                    $endgroup$















                    • $begingroup$
                      You're correct.
                      $endgroup$
                      – WoolierThanThou
                      8 hours ago
















                    1














                    $begingroup$

                    I'm assuming



                    $$
                    f(x)=begin{cases} 2 & xin [0,1] \ 0 & else end{cases}
                    $$



                    And



                    $$
                    g(x)=begin{cases} x & xin [0,1] \ 2-x & xin [1,2)\ 1 & xin [2,3] \0 & else end{cases}
                    $$



                    Adding this together, we see
                    $$
                    int_{-infty}^{infty} g(t)f(x-t)textrm{d}t=2int_{1-x}^x g(t)textrm{d}t,
                    $$

                    since for these values of $t,$ $f(x-t)=2$ and for all other values of $t$, $f(x-t)$ is $0$.



                    Now, $g(t)=0$ for $tleq 0$ so
                    $$
                    2int_{1-x}^x g(t)textrm{d}t=2int_0^x g(t)textrm{d}t=2int_0^x ttextrm{d}t,
                    $$

                    simply by plugging into the definition of $g$.






                    share|cite|improve this answer











                    $endgroup$















                    • $begingroup$
                      You're correct.
                      $endgroup$
                      – WoolierThanThou
                      8 hours ago














                    1














                    1










                    1







                    $begingroup$

                    I'm assuming



                    $$
                    f(x)=begin{cases} 2 & xin [0,1] \ 0 & else end{cases}
                    $$



                    And



                    $$
                    g(x)=begin{cases} x & xin [0,1] \ 2-x & xin [1,2)\ 1 & xin [2,3] \0 & else end{cases}
                    $$



                    Adding this together, we see
                    $$
                    int_{-infty}^{infty} g(t)f(x-t)textrm{d}t=2int_{1-x}^x g(t)textrm{d}t,
                    $$

                    since for these values of $t,$ $f(x-t)=2$ and for all other values of $t$, $f(x-t)$ is $0$.



                    Now, $g(t)=0$ for $tleq 0$ so
                    $$
                    2int_{1-x}^x g(t)textrm{d}t=2int_0^x g(t)textrm{d}t=2int_0^x ttextrm{d}t,
                    $$

                    simply by plugging into the definition of $g$.






                    share|cite|improve this answer











                    $endgroup$



                    I'm assuming



                    $$
                    f(x)=begin{cases} 2 & xin [0,1] \ 0 & else end{cases}
                    $$



                    And



                    $$
                    g(x)=begin{cases} x & xin [0,1] \ 2-x & xin [1,2)\ 1 & xin [2,3] \0 & else end{cases}
                    $$



                    Adding this together, we see
                    $$
                    int_{-infty}^{infty} g(t)f(x-t)textrm{d}t=2int_{1-x}^x g(t)textrm{d}t,
                    $$

                    since for these values of $t,$ $f(x-t)=2$ and for all other values of $t$, $f(x-t)$ is $0$.



                    Now, $g(t)=0$ for $tleq 0$ so
                    $$
                    2int_{1-x}^x g(t)textrm{d}t=2int_0^x g(t)textrm{d}t=2int_0^x ttextrm{d}t,
                    $$

                    simply by plugging into the definition of $g$.







                    share|cite|improve this answer














                    share|cite|improve this answer



                    share|cite|improve this answer








                    edited 8 hours ago

























                    answered 8 hours ago









                    WoolierThanThouWoolierThanThou

                    9961 silver badge7 bronze badges




                    9961 silver badge7 bronze badges















                    • $begingroup$
                      You're correct.
                      $endgroup$
                      – WoolierThanThou
                      8 hours ago


















                    • $begingroup$
                      You're correct.
                      $endgroup$
                      – WoolierThanThou
                      8 hours ago
















                    $begingroup$
                    You're correct.
                    $endgroup$
                    – WoolierThanThou
                    8 hours ago




                    $begingroup$
                    You're correct.
                    $endgroup$
                    – WoolierThanThou
                    8 hours ago



















                    draft saved

                    draft discarded



















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3348258%2fneed-help-to-understand-the-integral-rules-used-solving-the-convolution-of-two-f%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Taj Mahal Inhaltsverzeichnis Aufbau | Geschichte | 350-Jahr-Feier | Heutige Bedeutung | Siehe auch |...

                    Baia Sprie Cuprins Etimologie | Istorie | Demografie | Politică și administrație | Arii naturale...

                    Nicolae Petrescu-Găină Cuprins Biografie | Opera | In memoriam | Varia | Controverse, incertitudini...