super and subscripts on stackrel variableBetter looking nested subscripts and superscriptsAutomatically...

Output a Super Mario Image

What is the mathematical notation for rounding a given number to the nearest integer?

How do I say "quirky" in German without sounding derogatory?

Can Feather bring back a spell with Jump-Start?

What next step can I take in solving this sudoku?

Why is the year in this ISO timestamp not 2019?

ColorFunction based on array index in ListLinePlot

super and subscripts on stackrel variable

Why does the speed of sound decrease at high altitudes although the air density decreases?

Has SHA256 been broken by Treadwell Stanton DuPont?

A Mainer Expression

Is "you will become a subject matter expert" code for "you'll be working on your own 100% of the time"?

How much advanced notice is expected for faculty interviews?

What is this gigantic dish at Ben Gurion airport?

Bit one of the Intel 8080's Flags register

How would you control supersoldiers in a late iron-age society?

Is は a particle in こんにちは and こんばんは?

Are there any rules about taking damage whilst holding your breath in combat?

Is there a tool to measure the "maturity" of a code in Git?

Which is the current decimal separator?

Amortized Loans seem to benefit the bank more than the customer

What are these things that surround museum exhibits called?

Where is it? - The Google Earth Challenge Ep. 2

Is there any benefit to riders on the front of a paceline?



super and subscripts on stackrel variable


Better looking nested subscripts and superscriptsAutomatically Raising SubscriptsSuper and subscripts with DeclarePairedDelimiterEtiquette for math subscripts and superscriptsKerning super- and subscripts “semantically”Redefine hbar to work in super- or subscriptsUsing printeranswers environment, how to print solutions in the box without the title “Solutions”






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}







3















How I am trying to put a label above a variable omega. That works well but I cant find a better way to have the sub- and superscripts belonging to omega itself without a gap. using the superscripts on stackrel itself places them way to high



documentclass[]{scrreprt}

usepackage{eurosym,bm,amsmath} % Mathematische Notationen
usepackage{scalerel}

begin{document}

$stackrel{scaleto{f}{5pt}}{omega}{}^{(i)}_{kl}$

end{document}


enter image description here










share|improve this question

































    3















    How I am trying to put a label above a variable omega. That works well but I cant find a better way to have the sub- and superscripts belonging to omega itself without a gap. using the superscripts on stackrel itself places them way to high



    documentclass[]{scrreprt}

    usepackage{eurosym,bm,amsmath} % Mathematische Notationen
    usepackage{scalerel}

    begin{document}

    $stackrel{scaleto{f}{5pt}}{omega}{}^{(i)}_{kl}$

    end{document}


    enter image description here










    share|improve this question





























      3












      3








      3








      How I am trying to put a label above a variable omega. That works well but I cant find a better way to have the sub- and superscripts belonging to omega itself without a gap. using the superscripts on stackrel itself places them way to high



      documentclass[]{scrreprt}

      usepackage{eurosym,bm,amsmath} % Mathematische Notationen
      usepackage{scalerel}

      begin{document}

      $stackrel{scaleto{f}{5pt}}{omega}{}^{(i)}_{kl}$

      end{document}


      enter image description here










      share|improve this question
















      How I am trying to put a label above a variable omega. That works well but I cant find a better way to have the sub- and superscripts belonging to omega itself without a gap. using the superscripts on stackrel itself places them way to high



      documentclass[]{scrreprt}

      usepackage{eurosym,bm,amsmath} % Mathematische Notationen
      usepackage{scalerel}

      begin{document}

      $stackrel{scaleto{f}{5pt}}{omega}{}^{(i)}_{kl}$

      end{document}


      enter image description here







      math-mode subscripts superscripts stacking-symbols






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited 8 hours ago









      Bernard

      191k8 gold badges86 silver badges226 bronze badges




      191k8 gold badges86 silver badges226 bronze badges










      asked 9 hours ago









      QuastiatQuastiat

      666 bronze badges




      666 bronze badges

























          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          3
















          Something like this?



          enter image description here



          Note the use of , (thinspace) to nudge the "f" superscript to the right, to improve its centering above the omega character.



          documentclass{scrreprt}
          usepackage{amsmath} % for smash[t]{...} macro
          usepackage{scalerel} % for stackrel macro
          begin{document}
          $smash[t]{stackrel{,scaleto{f}{5pt}}{omega}}^{(i)}_{kl}$
          end{document}




          Addendum to address the OP's follow-up question: Since the macro lstmw will only be encountered in math mode, I'd define it as follows:



          newcommand{lstmw}[3]{%
          smash[t]{stackrel{scaleto{#2}{5pt}}{#1}}^{(i)}_{#3}}


          and write $lstmw{omega}{,f}{kl}$ in the body of the document.



          In fact, to make the superscript term (here: f) look a little bit less skinny and brittle, I'd define the macro as follows:



          newcommand{lstmw}[3]{%
          smash[t]{stackrel{scaleto{scriptscriptstyle #2}{5pt}}{#1}}^{(i)}_{#3}}


          This "works" because TeX's math glyphs are optically sized, rather than just linearly scaled versions of the "standard size" glyphs.






          share|improve this answer























          • 1





            thanks yeah thats exactly what i was hoping for :)

            – Quastiat
            8 hours ago






          • 1





            I am quite new to designing my own commands, but wouldn't i create one out of this like the following: newcommand{lstmw}[3]{$smash[t]{,stackrel{scaleto{ #2 }{5pt}}{ #1 }}^{(i)}_{ #3 }$} ? Using that in math mode gets me running into missing } errors...

            – Quastiat
            8 hours ago











          • @Quastiat - Please see the addendum I just posted.

            – Mico
            8 hours ago






          • 1





            thanks again that works just as expected, scaleto causes some issues with some letters but thats fine for me :)

            – Quastiat
            7 hours ago



















          2
















          The accentset command is another possibility. By default, the accent letter is in scriptscriptstyle, but you might be interested in having it in scriptstyle:



          documentclass{scrreprt}

          usepackage{accents}

          begin{document}

          $ accentset{mkern2muscriptstyle f}{omega}^{(i)}_{kl}qquad accentset{mkern1mu f}{omega}^{(i)}_{kl}$

          end{document}


          enter image description here






          share|improve this answer


























          • thanks for the input the works as well!

            – Quastiat
            7 hours ago














          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "85"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/"u003ecc by-sa 4.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });















          draft saved

          draft discarded
















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f508204%2fsuper-and-subscripts-on-stackrel-variable%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes








          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          3
















          Something like this?



          enter image description here



          Note the use of , (thinspace) to nudge the "f" superscript to the right, to improve its centering above the omega character.



          documentclass{scrreprt}
          usepackage{amsmath} % for smash[t]{...} macro
          usepackage{scalerel} % for stackrel macro
          begin{document}
          $smash[t]{stackrel{,scaleto{f}{5pt}}{omega}}^{(i)}_{kl}$
          end{document}




          Addendum to address the OP's follow-up question: Since the macro lstmw will only be encountered in math mode, I'd define it as follows:



          newcommand{lstmw}[3]{%
          smash[t]{stackrel{scaleto{#2}{5pt}}{#1}}^{(i)}_{#3}}


          and write $lstmw{omega}{,f}{kl}$ in the body of the document.



          In fact, to make the superscript term (here: f) look a little bit less skinny and brittle, I'd define the macro as follows:



          newcommand{lstmw}[3]{%
          smash[t]{stackrel{scaleto{scriptscriptstyle #2}{5pt}}{#1}}^{(i)}_{#3}}


          This "works" because TeX's math glyphs are optically sized, rather than just linearly scaled versions of the "standard size" glyphs.






          share|improve this answer























          • 1





            thanks yeah thats exactly what i was hoping for :)

            – Quastiat
            8 hours ago






          • 1





            I am quite new to designing my own commands, but wouldn't i create one out of this like the following: newcommand{lstmw}[3]{$smash[t]{,stackrel{scaleto{ #2 }{5pt}}{ #1 }}^{(i)}_{ #3 }$} ? Using that in math mode gets me running into missing } errors...

            – Quastiat
            8 hours ago











          • @Quastiat - Please see the addendum I just posted.

            – Mico
            8 hours ago






          • 1





            thanks again that works just as expected, scaleto causes some issues with some letters but thats fine for me :)

            – Quastiat
            7 hours ago
















          3
















          Something like this?



          enter image description here



          Note the use of , (thinspace) to nudge the "f" superscript to the right, to improve its centering above the omega character.



          documentclass{scrreprt}
          usepackage{amsmath} % for smash[t]{...} macro
          usepackage{scalerel} % for stackrel macro
          begin{document}
          $smash[t]{stackrel{,scaleto{f}{5pt}}{omega}}^{(i)}_{kl}$
          end{document}




          Addendum to address the OP's follow-up question: Since the macro lstmw will only be encountered in math mode, I'd define it as follows:



          newcommand{lstmw}[3]{%
          smash[t]{stackrel{scaleto{#2}{5pt}}{#1}}^{(i)}_{#3}}


          and write $lstmw{omega}{,f}{kl}$ in the body of the document.



          In fact, to make the superscript term (here: f) look a little bit less skinny and brittle, I'd define the macro as follows:



          newcommand{lstmw}[3]{%
          smash[t]{stackrel{scaleto{scriptscriptstyle #2}{5pt}}{#1}}^{(i)}_{#3}}


          This "works" because TeX's math glyphs are optically sized, rather than just linearly scaled versions of the "standard size" glyphs.






          share|improve this answer























          • 1





            thanks yeah thats exactly what i was hoping for :)

            – Quastiat
            8 hours ago






          • 1





            I am quite new to designing my own commands, but wouldn't i create one out of this like the following: newcommand{lstmw}[3]{$smash[t]{,stackrel{scaleto{ #2 }{5pt}}{ #1 }}^{(i)}_{ #3 }$} ? Using that in math mode gets me running into missing } errors...

            – Quastiat
            8 hours ago











          • @Quastiat - Please see the addendum I just posted.

            – Mico
            8 hours ago






          • 1





            thanks again that works just as expected, scaleto causes some issues with some letters but thats fine for me :)

            – Quastiat
            7 hours ago














          3














          3










          3









          Something like this?



          enter image description here



          Note the use of , (thinspace) to nudge the "f" superscript to the right, to improve its centering above the omega character.



          documentclass{scrreprt}
          usepackage{amsmath} % for smash[t]{...} macro
          usepackage{scalerel} % for stackrel macro
          begin{document}
          $smash[t]{stackrel{,scaleto{f}{5pt}}{omega}}^{(i)}_{kl}$
          end{document}




          Addendum to address the OP's follow-up question: Since the macro lstmw will only be encountered in math mode, I'd define it as follows:



          newcommand{lstmw}[3]{%
          smash[t]{stackrel{scaleto{#2}{5pt}}{#1}}^{(i)}_{#3}}


          and write $lstmw{omega}{,f}{kl}$ in the body of the document.



          In fact, to make the superscript term (here: f) look a little bit less skinny and brittle, I'd define the macro as follows:



          newcommand{lstmw}[3]{%
          smash[t]{stackrel{scaleto{scriptscriptstyle #2}{5pt}}{#1}}^{(i)}_{#3}}


          This "works" because TeX's math glyphs are optically sized, rather than just linearly scaled versions of the "standard size" glyphs.






          share|improve this answer















          Something like this?



          enter image description here



          Note the use of , (thinspace) to nudge the "f" superscript to the right, to improve its centering above the omega character.



          documentclass{scrreprt}
          usepackage{amsmath} % for smash[t]{...} macro
          usepackage{scalerel} % for stackrel macro
          begin{document}
          $smash[t]{stackrel{,scaleto{f}{5pt}}{omega}}^{(i)}_{kl}$
          end{document}




          Addendum to address the OP's follow-up question: Since the macro lstmw will only be encountered in math mode, I'd define it as follows:



          newcommand{lstmw}[3]{%
          smash[t]{stackrel{scaleto{#2}{5pt}}{#1}}^{(i)}_{#3}}


          and write $lstmw{omega}{,f}{kl}$ in the body of the document.



          In fact, to make the superscript term (here: f) look a little bit less skinny and brittle, I'd define the macro as follows:



          newcommand{lstmw}[3]{%
          smash[t]{stackrel{scaleto{scriptscriptstyle #2}{5pt}}{#1}}^{(i)}_{#3}}


          This "works" because TeX's math glyphs are optically sized, rather than just linearly scaled versions of the "standard size" glyphs.







          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited 8 hours ago

























          answered 9 hours ago









          MicoMico

          305k33 gold badges420 silver badges829 bronze badges




          305k33 gold badges420 silver badges829 bronze badges











          • 1





            thanks yeah thats exactly what i was hoping for :)

            – Quastiat
            8 hours ago






          • 1





            I am quite new to designing my own commands, but wouldn't i create one out of this like the following: newcommand{lstmw}[3]{$smash[t]{,stackrel{scaleto{ #2 }{5pt}}{ #1 }}^{(i)}_{ #3 }$} ? Using that in math mode gets me running into missing } errors...

            – Quastiat
            8 hours ago











          • @Quastiat - Please see the addendum I just posted.

            – Mico
            8 hours ago






          • 1





            thanks again that works just as expected, scaleto causes some issues with some letters but thats fine for me :)

            – Quastiat
            7 hours ago














          • 1





            thanks yeah thats exactly what i was hoping for :)

            – Quastiat
            8 hours ago






          • 1





            I am quite new to designing my own commands, but wouldn't i create one out of this like the following: newcommand{lstmw}[3]{$smash[t]{,stackrel{scaleto{ #2 }{5pt}}{ #1 }}^{(i)}_{ #3 }$} ? Using that in math mode gets me running into missing } errors...

            – Quastiat
            8 hours ago











          • @Quastiat - Please see the addendum I just posted.

            – Mico
            8 hours ago






          • 1





            thanks again that works just as expected, scaleto causes some issues with some letters but thats fine for me :)

            – Quastiat
            7 hours ago








          1




          1





          thanks yeah thats exactly what i was hoping for :)

          – Quastiat
          8 hours ago





          thanks yeah thats exactly what i was hoping for :)

          – Quastiat
          8 hours ago




          1




          1





          I am quite new to designing my own commands, but wouldn't i create one out of this like the following: newcommand{lstmw}[3]{$smash[t]{,stackrel{scaleto{ #2 }{5pt}}{ #1 }}^{(i)}_{ #3 }$} ? Using that in math mode gets me running into missing } errors...

          – Quastiat
          8 hours ago





          I am quite new to designing my own commands, but wouldn't i create one out of this like the following: newcommand{lstmw}[3]{$smash[t]{,stackrel{scaleto{ #2 }{5pt}}{ #1 }}^{(i)}_{ #3 }$} ? Using that in math mode gets me running into missing } errors...

          – Quastiat
          8 hours ago













          @Quastiat - Please see the addendum I just posted.

          – Mico
          8 hours ago





          @Quastiat - Please see the addendum I just posted.

          – Mico
          8 hours ago




          1




          1





          thanks again that works just as expected, scaleto causes some issues with some letters but thats fine for me :)

          – Quastiat
          7 hours ago





          thanks again that works just as expected, scaleto causes some issues with some letters but thats fine for me :)

          – Quastiat
          7 hours ago













          2
















          The accentset command is another possibility. By default, the accent letter is in scriptscriptstyle, but you might be interested in having it in scriptstyle:



          documentclass{scrreprt}

          usepackage{accents}

          begin{document}

          $ accentset{mkern2muscriptstyle f}{omega}^{(i)}_{kl}qquad accentset{mkern1mu f}{omega}^{(i)}_{kl}$

          end{document}


          enter image description here






          share|improve this answer


























          • thanks for the input the works as well!

            – Quastiat
            7 hours ago
















          2
















          The accentset command is another possibility. By default, the accent letter is in scriptscriptstyle, but you might be interested in having it in scriptstyle:



          documentclass{scrreprt}

          usepackage{accents}

          begin{document}

          $ accentset{mkern2muscriptstyle f}{omega}^{(i)}_{kl}qquad accentset{mkern1mu f}{omega}^{(i)}_{kl}$

          end{document}


          enter image description here






          share|improve this answer


























          • thanks for the input the works as well!

            – Quastiat
            7 hours ago














          2














          2










          2









          The accentset command is another possibility. By default, the accent letter is in scriptscriptstyle, but you might be interested in having it in scriptstyle:



          documentclass{scrreprt}

          usepackage{accents}

          begin{document}

          $ accentset{mkern2muscriptstyle f}{omega}^{(i)}_{kl}qquad accentset{mkern1mu f}{omega}^{(i)}_{kl}$

          end{document}


          enter image description here






          share|improve this answer













          The accentset command is another possibility. By default, the accent letter is in scriptscriptstyle, but you might be interested in having it in scriptstyle:



          documentclass{scrreprt}

          usepackage{accents}

          begin{document}

          $ accentset{mkern2muscriptstyle f}{omega}^{(i)}_{kl}qquad accentset{mkern1mu f}{omega}^{(i)}_{kl}$

          end{document}


          enter image description here







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered 8 hours ago









          BernardBernard

          191k8 gold badges86 silver badges226 bronze badges




          191k8 gold badges86 silver badges226 bronze badges
















          • thanks for the input the works as well!

            – Quastiat
            7 hours ago



















          • thanks for the input the works as well!

            – Quastiat
            7 hours ago

















          thanks for the input the works as well!

          – Quastiat
          7 hours ago





          thanks for the input the works as well!

          – Quastiat
          7 hours ago



















          draft saved

          draft discarded



















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f508204%2fsuper-and-subscripts-on-stackrel-variable%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Taj Mahal Inhaltsverzeichnis Aufbau | Geschichte | 350-Jahr-Feier | Heutige Bedeutung | Siehe auch |...

          Baia Sprie Cuprins Etimologie | Istorie | Demografie | Politică și administrație | Arii naturale...

          Nicolae Petrescu-Găină Cuprins Biografie | Opera | In memoriam | Varia | Controverse, incertitudini...