Why would thermal imaging be used to locate the Chandrayaan-2 lander?Does India have plans to explore Mars...

My favorite color is blue what is your favorite color?

Are scroll bars dead in 2019?

Does the word “uzi” need to be capitalized?

What are the advantages and disadvantages of Preprints.org compared with arXiv?

Why does F + F' = 1?

"Not enough RAM " error in PIC16F877a

Is English tonal for some words, like "permit"?

Why would "an mule" be used instead of "a mule"?

Why would thermal imaging be used to locate the Chandrayaan-2 lander?

Procedure for traffic not in sight

What happens when a caster loses concentration on a banished creature?

I see your BIDMAS and raise you a BADMIS

What is the use of FullForm in Mathematica?

Dividing Divisive Divisors

A medieval fantasy adventurer lights a torch in a 100% pure oxygen room. What happens?

What is going on: C++ std::move on std::shared_ptr increases use_count?

Should I use my toaster oven for slow roasting?

Are Democrats more likely to believe Astrology is a science?

For how long could UK opposition parties prevent new elections?

Is BitLocker useful in the case of stolen laptop?

Could the government trigger by-elections to regain a majority?

RP Automatic Updates

Is there a star over my head?

Random point on a sphere



Why would thermal imaging be used to locate the Chandrayaan-2 lander?


Does India have plans to explore Mars after Mangalyaan?Why did ISRO require additional tracking ships in the South Pacific for its MOM mission?Why was the 100m Green Bank dish needed together with DSN's 70m Goldstone dish to detect Chandrayaan-1 in lunar orbit?How have/how will Indian ground stations be used for comms or tracking of deep space spacecraft?Launching sounding rockets from the magnetic equator (ISRO's Thumba)Chandrayaan-2; time taken to get to the MoonChandrayaan-2 orbiter and lander communications with Earth (IDSN)Is there any way to determine the fate of Chandrayaan-2?Did the cold temperature of the lunar south pole cause Chandrayaan-2's on board electronics to fail?What are the operating systems and network stack in the Chandrayaan - 2 vehicles?






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}







6












$begingroup$


Tweets and news suggest that Chandrayaan-2 lander may have been located, using thermal imaging by the Chandrayaan-2 orbiter.





  • Space.com: India Just Found Its Lost Vikram Lander on the Moon, Still No Signal




    K Sivan, chief of the Indian Space Research Organisation, said today (Sept. 8) that the Vikram lander was located by Chandrayaan-2 and efforts to restore contact the probe will continue for at least 14 days, according to a Times of India report.



    "We have found the location of Lander Vikram on [the] lunar surface and Orbiter has clicked a thermal image of Lander," Sivan told the ANI news service in an interview, adding that attempts to communicate with the lander are ongoing.





  • Science Alert: Update: India Has Located Its Lost Moon Lander And Is Trying to Make Contact




    n an exclusive interview, ISRO Chairman K. Sivan told India Today TV that the Chandrayaan 2 orbiter had sent back a thermal image of the location of the Vikram lander, and they're now attempting to contact it.





  • Asian News International: tweet




    Indian Space Research Organisation (ISRO) Chief, K Sivan to ANI:We've found the location of #VikramLander on lunar surface&orbiter has clicked a thermal image of Lander. But there is no communication yet. We are trying to have contact. It will be communicated soon. #Chandrayaan2





  • New York Times: India Says It Has Located Chandrayaan-2 Lander on Moon’s Surface




    K. Sivan, the director of the Indian Space Research Organization, told national news outlets that a thermal image had been taken by the Chandrayaan-2 mission’s orbiter. He said it was still unclear whether the lander was damaged, though he expected it had experienced a “hard landing.”



    “We are trying to establish a contact,” he was quoted as saying by Asian News International.



    The thermal image from the orbiter has not been released publicly. A spokesman for the space agency did not respond to requests for comment on Sunday.





Question: Why a thermal image? Is there expected to be better contrast than in visible light? Does Chandrayaan-2 not have a visible light camera? Wouldn't the diffraction-limited resolution at thermal infrared (5-20 microns) be much worse than in the visible (0.4-0.7 microns)?










share|improve this question











$endgroup$










  • 1




    $begingroup$
    the ANI report (non tweet): aninews.in/news/national/general-news/…
    $endgroup$
    – amI
    9 hours ago


















6












$begingroup$


Tweets and news suggest that Chandrayaan-2 lander may have been located, using thermal imaging by the Chandrayaan-2 orbiter.





  • Space.com: India Just Found Its Lost Vikram Lander on the Moon, Still No Signal




    K Sivan, chief of the Indian Space Research Organisation, said today (Sept. 8) that the Vikram lander was located by Chandrayaan-2 and efforts to restore contact the probe will continue for at least 14 days, according to a Times of India report.



    "We have found the location of Lander Vikram on [the] lunar surface and Orbiter has clicked a thermal image of Lander," Sivan told the ANI news service in an interview, adding that attempts to communicate with the lander are ongoing.





  • Science Alert: Update: India Has Located Its Lost Moon Lander And Is Trying to Make Contact




    n an exclusive interview, ISRO Chairman K. Sivan told India Today TV that the Chandrayaan 2 orbiter had sent back a thermal image of the location of the Vikram lander, and they're now attempting to contact it.





  • Asian News International: tweet




    Indian Space Research Organisation (ISRO) Chief, K Sivan to ANI:We've found the location of #VikramLander on lunar surface&orbiter has clicked a thermal image of Lander. But there is no communication yet. We are trying to have contact. It will be communicated soon. #Chandrayaan2





  • New York Times: India Says It Has Located Chandrayaan-2 Lander on Moon’s Surface




    K. Sivan, the director of the Indian Space Research Organization, told national news outlets that a thermal image had been taken by the Chandrayaan-2 mission’s orbiter. He said it was still unclear whether the lander was damaged, though he expected it had experienced a “hard landing.”



    “We are trying to establish a contact,” he was quoted as saying by Asian News International.



    The thermal image from the orbiter has not been released publicly. A spokesman for the space agency did not respond to requests for comment on Sunday.





Question: Why a thermal image? Is there expected to be better contrast than in visible light? Does Chandrayaan-2 not have a visible light camera? Wouldn't the diffraction-limited resolution at thermal infrared (5-20 microns) be much worse than in the visible (0.4-0.7 microns)?










share|improve this question











$endgroup$










  • 1




    $begingroup$
    the ANI report (non tweet): aninews.in/news/national/general-news/…
    $endgroup$
    – amI
    9 hours ago














6












6








6


1



$begingroup$


Tweets and news suggest that Chandrayaan-2 lander may have been located, using thermal imaging by the Chandrayaan-2 orbiter.





  • Space.com: India Just Found Its Lost Vikram Lander on the Moon, Still No Signal




    K Sivan, chief of the Indian Space Research Organisation, said today (Sept. 8) that the Vikram lander was located by Chandrayaan-2 and efforts to restore contact the probe will continue for at least 14 days, according to a Times of India report.



    "We have found the location of Lander Vikram on [the] lunar surface and Orbiter has clicked a thermal image of Lander," Sivan told the ANI news service in an interview, adding that attempts to communicate with the lander are ongoing.





  • Science Alert: Update: India Has Located Its Lost Moon Lander And Is Trying to Make Contact




    n an exclusive interview, ISRO Chairman K. Sivan told India Today TV that the Chandrayaan 2 orbiter had sent back a thermal image of the location of the Vikram lander, and they're now attempting to contact it.





  • Asian News International: tweet




    Indian Space Research Organisation (ISRO) Chief, K Sivan to ANI:We've found the location of #VikramLander on lunar surface&orbiter has clicked a thermal image of Lander. But there is no communication yet. We are trying to have contact. It will be communicated soon. #Chandrayaan2





  • New York Times: India Says It Has Located Chandrayaan-2 Lander on Moon’s Surface




    K. Sivan, the director of the Indian Space Research Organization, told national news outlets that a thermal image had been taken by the Chandrayaan-2 mission’s orbiter. He said it was still unclear whether the lander was damaged, though he expected it had experienced a “hard landing.”



    “We are trying to establish a contact,” he was quoted as saying by Asian News International.



    The thermal image from the orbiter has not been released publicly. A spokesman for the space agency did not respond to requests for comment on Sunday.





Question: Why a thermal image? Is there expected to be better contrast than in visible light? Does Chandrayaan-2 not have a visible light camera? Wouldn't the diffraction-limited resolution at thermal infrared (5-20 microns) be much worse than in the visible (0.4-0.7 microns)?










share|improve this question











$endgroup$




Tweets and news suggest that Chandrayaan-2 lander may have been located, using thermal imaging by the Chandrayaan-2 orbiter.





  • Space.com: India Just Found Its Lost Vikram Lander on the Moon, Still No Signal




    K Sivan, chief of the Indian Space Research Organisation, said today (Sept. 8) that the Vikram lander was located by Chandrayaan-2 and efforts to restore contact the probe will continue for at least 14 days, according to a Times of India report.



    "We have found the location of Lander Vikram on [the] lunar surface and Orbiter has clicked a thermal image of Lander," Sivan told the ANI news service in an interview, adding that attempts to communicate with the lander are ongoing.





  • Science Alert: Update: India Has Located Its Lost Moon Lander And Is Trying to Make Contact




    n an exclusive interview, ISRO Chairman K. Sivan told India Today TV that the Chandrayaan 2 orbiter had sent back a thermal image of the location of the Vikram lander, and they're now attempting to contact it.





  • Asian News International: tweet




    Indian Space Research Organisation (ISRO) Chief, K Sivan to ANI:We've found the location of #VikramLander on lunar surface&orbiter has clicked a thermal image of Lander. But there is no communication yet. We are trying to have contact. It will be communicated soon. #Chandrayaan2





  • New York Times: India Says It Has Located Chandrayaan-2 Lander on Moon’s Surface




    K. Sivan, the director of the Indian Space Research Organization, told national news outlets that a thermal image had been taken by the Chandrayaan-2 mission’s orbiter. He said it was still unclear whether the lander was damaged, though he expected it had experienced a “hard landing.”



    “We are trying to establish a contact,” he was quoted as saying by Asian News International.



    The thermal image from the orbiter has not been released publicly. A spokesman for the space agency did not respond to requests for comment on Sunday.





Question: Why a thermal image? Is there expected to be better contrast than in visible light? Does Chandrayaan-2 not have a visible light camera? Wouldn't the diffraction-limited resolution at thermal infrared (5-20 microns) be much worse than in the visible (0.4-0.7 microns)?







lunar-landing imaging isro chandrayaan-spacecraft mission-anomaly






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 12 hours ago







uhoh

















asked 12 hours ago









uhohuhoh

52.5k24 gold badges205 silver badges670 bronze badges




52.5k24 gold badges205 silver badges670 bronze badges











  • 1




    $begingroup$
    the ANI report (non tweet): aninews.in/news/national/general-news/…
    $endgroup$
    – amI
    9 hours ago














  • 1




    $begingroup$
    the ANI report (non tweet): aninews.in/news/national/general-news/…
    $endgroup$
    – amI
    9 hours ago








1




1




$begingroup$
the ANI report (non tweet): aninews.in/news/national/general-news/…
$endgroup$
– amI
9 hours ago




$begingroup$
the ANI report (non tweet): aninews.in/news/national/general-news/…
$endgroup$
– amI
9 hours ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















9














$begingroup$

It was not a thermal image at all.




It is an optical image that has been captured by Orbiter of the lander
spot and not thermal image as reported by others media houses. OHRC is
same like our human eye. Since it consists of only one spectral band
in visible region, so Image will be of gray scale, Not color image.




https://twitter.com/Madrassan_Pinky/status/1170618378442067970




ISRO Sources confirms me that "Lander found 500m away from the actual
landing spot. Seen from OHRC (Optical High Resolution Camera) image
and it is intact. Trying to send commands from Bangalore control
center." @ABPNews




https://twitter.com/Madrassan_Pinky/status/1170609817850793984




There are many fake images going viral claiming to be of "Lander Spot
on Lunar surface" clicked by Orbiter. FYI, No such image has been
released by @isro so far.




https://twitter.com/Madrassan_Pinky/status/1170691213839585285




It is noticed that accounts in the name of Kailasavadivoo Sivan is
operational on many Social media. This is to clarify that Dr. K Sivan,
Chairman, ISRO does not have any personal accounts.



For official accounts of ISRO, please see https://bit.ly/2lHe9GT




https://twitter.com/isro/status/1170993695950172160



There are some articles trying to "sell" what looks like a thermal image of the lander (I would prefer not to link it), but in one case the image shows almost half of the Moon, so has no resolution to represent what it says it does, and a second one is some kind of closeup (if real at all), possibly made just after separation of the lander.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$















  • $begingroup$
    Well that certainly explains a lot!
    $endgroup$
    – uhoh
    12 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    I've added a supplementary answer. Thanks for all the great links!
    $endgroup$
    – uhoh
    11 hours ago



















3














$begingroup$

Thanks to @jkavalik for the informative answer and helpful links!



As is pointed out there, there seems to be an abundance of false social media accounts claiming to be K. Silvan.



From today's Sep 09, 2019 post: Regarding Social Media Accounts in the name of Kailasavadivoo Sivan, Chairman ISRO:




It has been noted that social media accounts in the name of Kailasavadivoo Sivan (along with photographs of K. Sivan) is operational and active on social media platforms. This is to clarify that K. Sivan, Chairman, ISRO does not have any personal account on any social media platforms. Hence all the information on all such accounts are not authentic.



The official account of ISRO on all social media platforms are as follows:




-https://www.twitter.com/isro
-https://www.facebook.com/ISRO
-Youtube ISRO Official: https://bit.ly/2Mq0C2y which is currently https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCw5hEVOTfz_AfzsNFWyNlNg



According to the latest Sep 07, 2019 update: https://www.isro.gov.in/update/07-sep-2019/chandrayaan-2-latest-update Chandrayaan-2 has an extremely nice visible light telescope with a 30 centimeter aperture! At 0.5 microns wavelength, $1.22 lambda / d$ would provide a resolution of about 0.4 arcseconds. At a minimum distance of 100 km that would be a resolution of about 20 cm.




Chandrayaan-2 mission was a highly complex mission, which represented a significant technological leap compared to the previous missions of ISRO, which brought together an Orbiter, Lander and Rover to explore the unexplored south pole of the Moon. Since the launch of Chandrayaan-2 on July 22, 2019, not only India but the whole world watched its progress from one phase to the next with great expectations and excitement. This was a unique mission which aimed at studying not just one area of the Moon but all the areas combining the exosphere, the surface as well as the sub-surface of the moon in a single mission. The Orbiter has already been placed in its intended orbit around the Moon and shall enrich our understanding of the moon’s evolution and mapping of the minerals and water molecules in the Polar Regions, using its eight state-of-the-art scientific instruments. The Orbiter camera is the highest resolution camera (0.3m) in any lunar mission so far and shall provide high resolution images which will be immensely useful to the global scientific community. The precise launch and mission management has ensured a long life of almost 7 years instead of the planned one year. The Vikram Lander followed the planned descent trajectory from its orbit of 35 km to just below 2 km above the surface. All the systems and sensors of the Lander functioned excellently until this point and proved many new technologies such as variable thrust propulsion technology used in the Lander. The success criteria was defined for each and every phase of the mission and till date 90 to 95% of the mission objectives have been accomplished and will continue contribute to Lunar science , notwithstanding the loss of communication with the Lander.




It's unusual for the New York Times to get things wrong, but reading carefully they are quoting other news outlets, not K. Silvan directly.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$


















    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "508"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/"u003ecc by-sa 4.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });















    draft saved

    draft discarded
















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fspace.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f38672%2fwhy-would-thermal-imaging-be-used-to-locate-the-chandrayaan-2-lander%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    9














    $begingroup$

    It was not a thermal image at all.




    It is an optical image that has been captured by Orbiter of the lander
    spot and not thermal image as reported by others media houses. OHRC is
    same like our human eye. Since it consists of only one spectral band
    in visible region, so Image will be of gray scale, Not color image.




    https://twitter.com/Madrassan_Pinky/status/1170618378442067970




    ISRO Sources confirms me that "Lander found 500m away from the actual
    landing spot. Seen from OHRC (Optical High Resolution Camera) image
    and it is intact. Trying to send commands from Bangalore control
    center." @ABPNews




    https://twitter.com/Madrassan_Pinky/status/1170609817850793984




    There are many fake images going viral claiming to be of "Lander Spot
    on Lunar surface" clicked by Orbiter. FYI, No such image has been
    released by @isro so far.




    https://twitter.com/Madrassan_Pinky/status/1170691213839585285




    It is noticed that accounts in the name of Kailasavadivoo Sivan is
    operational on many Social media. This is to clarify that Dr. K Sivan,
    Chairman, ISRO does not have any personal accounts.



    For official accounts of ISRO, please see https://bit.ly/2lHe9GT




    https://twitter.com/isro/status/1170993695950172160



    There are some articles trying to "sell" what looks like a thermal image of the lander (I would prefer not to link it), but in one case the image shows almost half of the Moon, so has no resolution to represent what it says it does, and a second one is some kind of closeup (if real at all), possibly made just after separation of the lander.






    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$















    • $begingroup$
      Well that certainly explains a lot!
      $endgroup$
      – uhoh
      12 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      I've added a supplementary answer. Thanks for all the great links!
      $endgroup$
      – uhoh
      11 hours ago
















    9














    $begingroup$

    It was not a thermal image at all.




    It is an optical image that has been captured by Orbiter of the lander
    spot and not thermal image as reported by others media houses. OHRC is
    same like our human eye. Since it consists of only one spectral band
    in visible region, so Image will be of gray scale, Not color image.




    https://twitter.com/Madrassan_Pinky/status/1170618378442067970




    ISRO Sources confirms me that "Lander found 500m away from the actual
    landing spot. Seen from OHRC (Optical High Resolution Camera) image
    and it is intact. Trying to send commands from Bangalore control
    center." @ABPNews




    https://twitter.com/Madrassan_Pinky/status/1170609817850793984




    There are many fake images going viral claiming to be of "Lander Spot
    on Lunar surface" clicked by Orbiter. FYI, No such image has been
    released by @isro so far.




    https://twitter.com/Madrassan_Pinky/status/1170691213839585285




    It is noticed that accounts in the name of Kailasavadivoo Sivan is
    operational on many Social media. This is to clarify that Dr. K Sivan,
    Chairman, ISRO does not have any personal accounts.



    For official accounts of ISRO, please see https://bit.ly/2lHe9GT




    https://twitter.com/isro/status/1170993695950172160



    There are some articles trying to "sell" what looks like a thermal image of the lander (I would prefer not to link it), but in one case the image shows almost half of the Moon, so has no resolution to represent what it says it does, and a second one is some kind of closeup (if real at all), possibly made just after separation of the lander.






    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$















    • $begingroup$
      Well that certainly explains a lot!
      $endgroup$
      – uhoh
      12 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      I've added a supplementary answer. Thanks for all the great links!
      $endgroup$
      – uhoh
      11 hours ago














    9














    9










    9







    $begingroup$

    It was not a thermal image at all.




    It is an optical image that has been captured by Orbiter of the lander
    spot and not thermal image as reported by others media houses. OHRC is
    same like our human eye. Since it consists of only one spectral band
    in visible region, so Image will be of gray scale, Not color image.




    https://twitter.com/Madrassan_Pinky/status/1170618378442067970




    ISRO Sources confirms me that "Lander found 500m away from the actual
    landing spot. Seen from OHRC (Optical High Resolution Camera) image
    and it is intact. Trying to send commands from Bangalore control
    center." @ABPNews




    https://twitter.com/Madrassan_Pinky/status/1170609817850793984




    There are many fake images going viral claiming to be of "Lander Spot
    on Lunar surface" clicked by Orbiter. FYI, No such image has been
    released by @isro so far.




    https://twitter.com/Madrassan_Pinky/status/1170691213839585285




    It is noticed that accounts in the name of Kailasavadivoo Sivan is
    operational on many Social media. This is to clarify that Dr. K Sivan,
    Chairman, ISRO does not have any personal accounts.



    For official accounts of ISRO, please see https://bit.ly/2lHe9GT




    https://twitter.com/isro/status/1170993695950172160



    There are some articles trying to "sell" what looks like a thermal image of the lander (I would prefer not to link it), but in one case the image shows almost half of the Moon, so has no resolution to represent what it says it does, and a second one is some kind of closeup (if real at all), possibly made just after separation of the lander.






    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$



    It was not a thermal image at all.




    It is an optical image that has been captured by Orbiter of the lander
    spot and not thermal image as reported by others media houses. OHRC is
    same like our human eye. Since it consists of only one spectral band
    in visible region, so Image will be of gray scale, Not color image.




    https://twitter.com/Madrassan_Pinky/status/1170618378442067970




    ISRO Sources confirms me that "Lander found 500m away from the actual
    landing spot. Seen from OHRC (Optical High Resolution Camera) image
    and it is intact. Trying to send commands from Bangalore control
    center." @ABPNews




    https://twitter.com/Madrassan_Pinky/status/1170609817850793984




    There are many fake images going viral claiming to be of "Lander Spot
    on Lunar surface" clicked by Orbiter. FYI, No such image has been
    released by @isro so far.




    https://twitter.com/Madrassan_Pinky/status/1170691213839585285




    It is noticed that accounts in the name of Kailasavadivoo Sivan is
    operational on many Social media. This is to clarify that Dr. K Sivan,
    Chairman, ISRO does not have any personal accounts.



    For official accounts of ISRO, please see https://bit.ly/2lHe9GT




    https://twitter.com/isro/status/1170993695950172160



    There are some articles trying to "sell" what looks like a thermal image of the lander (I would prefer not to link it), but in one case the image shows almost half of the Moon, so has no resolution to represent what it says it does, and a second one is some kind of closeup (if real at all), possibly made just after separation of the lander.







    share|improve this answer












    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer










    answered 12 hours ago









    jkavalikjkavalik

    4,3071 gold badge18 silver badges42 bronze badges




    4,3071 gold badge18 silver badges42 bronze badges















    • $begingroup$
      Well that certainly explains a lot!
      $endgroup$
      – uhoh
      12 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      I've added a supplementary answer. Thanks for all the great links!
      $endgroup$
      – uhoh
      11 hours ago


















    • $begingroup$
      Well that certainly explains a lot!
      $endgroup$
      – uhoh
      12 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      I've added a supplementary answer. Thanks for all the great links!
      $endgroup$
      – uhoh
      11 hours ago
















    $begingroup$
    Well that certainly explains a lot!
    $endgroup$
    – uhoh
    12 hours ago




    $begingroup$
    Well that certainly explains a lot!
    $endgroup$
    – uhoh
    12 hours ago












    $begingroup$
    I've added a supplementary answer. Thanks for all the great links!
    $endgroup$
    – uhoh
    11 hours ago




    $begingroup$
    I've added a supplementary answer. Thanks for all the great links!
    $endgroup$
    – uhoh
    11 hours ago













    3














    $begingroup$

    Thanks to @jkavalik for the informative answer and helpful links!



    As is pointed out there, there seems to be an abundance of false social media accounts claiming to be K. Silvan.



    From today's Sep 09, 2019 post: Regarding Social Media Accounts in the name of Kailasavadivoo Sivan, Chairman ISRO:




    It has been noted that social media accounts in the name of Kailasavadivoo Sivan (along with photographs of K. Sivan) is operational and active on social media platforms. This is to clarify that K. Sivan, Chairman, ISRO does not have any personal account on any social media platforms. Hence all the information on all such accounts are not authentic.



    The official account of ISRO on all social media platforms are as follows:




    -https://www.twitter.com/isro
    -https://www.facebook.com/ISRO
    -Youtube ISRO Official: https://bit.ly/2Mq0C2y which is currently https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCw5hEVOTfz_AfzsNFWyNlNg



    According to the latest Sep 07, 2019 update: https://www.isro.gov.in/update/07-sep-2019/chandrayaan-2-latest-update Chandrayaan-2 has an extremely nice visible light telescope with a 30 centimeter aperture! At 0.5 microns wavelength, $1.22 lambda / d$ would provide a resolution of about 0.4 arcseconds. At a minimum distance of 100 km that would be a resolution of about 20 cm.




    Chandrayaan-2 mission was a highly complex mission, which represented a significant technological leap compared to the previous missions of ISRO, which brought together an Orbiter, Lander and Rover to explore the unexplored south pole of the Moon. Since the launch of Chandrayaan-2 on July 22, 2019, not only India but the whole world watched its progress from one phase to the next with great expectations and excitement. This was a unique mission which aimed at studying not just one area of the Moon but all the areas combining the exosphere, the surface as well as the sub-surface of the moon in a single mission. The Orbiter has already been placed in its intended orbit around the Moon and shall enrich our understanding of the moon’s evolution and mapping of the minerals and water molecules in the Polar Regions, using its eight state-of-the-art scientific instruments. The Orbiter camera is the highest resolution camera (0.3m) in any lunar mission so far and shall provide high resolution images which will be immensely useful to the global scientific community. The precise launch and mission management has ensured a long life of almost 7 years instead of the planned one year. The Vikram Lander followed the planned descent trajectory from its orbit of 35 km to just below 2 km above the surface. All the systems and sensors of the Lander functioned excellently until this point and proved many new technologies such as variable thrust propulsion technology used in the Lander. The success criteria was defined for each and every phase of the mission and till date 90 to 95% of the mission objectives have been accomplished and will continue contribute to Lunar science , notwithstanding the loss of communication with the Lander.




    It's unusual for the New York Times to get things wrong, but reading carefully they are quoting other news outlets, not K. Silvan directly.






    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$




















      3














      $begingroup$

      Thanks to @jkavalik for the informative answer and helpful links!



      As is pointed out there, there seems to be an abundance of false social media accounts claiming to be K. Silvan.



      From today's Sep 09, 2019 post: Regarding Social Media Accounts in the name of Kailasavadivoo Sivan, Chairman ISRO:




      It has been noted that social media accounts in the name of Kailasavadivoo Sivan (along with photographs of K. Sivan) is operational and active on social media platforms. This is to clarify that K. Sivan, Chairman, ISRO does not have any personal account on any social media platforms. Hence all the information on all such accounts are not authentic.



      The official account of ISRO on all social media platforms are as follows:




      -https://www.twitter.com/isro
      -https://www.facebook.com/ISRO
      -Youtube ISRO Official: https://bit.ly/2Mq0C2y which is currently https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCw5hEVOTfz_AfzsNFWyNlNg



      According to the latest Sep 07, 2019 update: https://www.isro.gov.in/update/07-sep-2019/chandrayaan-2-latest-update Chandrayaan-2 has an extremely nice visible light telescope with a 30 centimeter aperture! At 0.5 microns wavelength, $1.22 lambda / d$ would provide a resolution of about 0.4 arcseconds. At a minimum distance of 100 km that would be a resolution of about 20 cm.




      Chandrayaan-2 mission was a highly complex mission, which represented a significant technological leap compared to the previous missions of ISRO, which brought together an Orbiter, Lander and Rover to explore the unexplored south pole of the Moon. Since the launch of Chandrayaan-2 on July 22, 2019, not only India but the whole world watched its progress from one phase to the next with great expectations and excitement. This was a unique mission which aimed at studying not just one area of the Moon but all the areas combining the exosphere, the surface as well as the sub-surface of the moon in a single mission. The Orbiter has already been placed in its intended orbit around the Moon and shall enrich our understanding of the moon’s evolution and mapping of the minerals and water molecules in the Polar Regions, using its eight state-of-the-art scientific instruments. The Orbiter camera is the highest resolution camera (0.3m) in any lunar mission so far and shall provide high resolution images which will be immensely useful to the global scientific community. The precise launch and mission management has ensured a long life of almost 7 years instead of the planned one year. The Vikram Lander followed the planned descent trajectory from its orbit of 35 km to just below 2 km above the surface. All the systems and sensors of the Lander functioned excellently until this point and proved many new technologies such as variable thrust propulsion technology used in the Lander. The success criteria was defined for each and every phase of the mission and till date 90 to 95% of the mission objectives have been accomplished and will continue contribute to Lunar science , notwithstanding the loss of communication with the Lander.




      It's unusual for the New York Times to get things wrong, but reading carefully they are quoting other news outlets, not K. Silvan directly.






      share|improve this answer









      $endgroup$


















        3














        3










        3







        $begingroup$

        Thanks to @jkavalik for the informative answer and helpful links!



        As is pointed out there, there seems to be an abundance of false social media accounts claiming to be K. Silvan.



        From today's Sep 09, 2019 post: Regarding Social Media Accounts in the name of Kailasavadivoo Sivan, Chairman ISRO:




        It has been noted that social media accounts in the name of Kailasavadivoo Sivan (along with photographs of K. Sivan) is operational and active on social media platforms. This is to clarify that K. Sivan, Chairman, ISRO does not have any personal account on any social media platforms. Hence all the information on all such accounts are not authentic.



        The official account of ISRO on all social media platforms are as follows:




        -https://www.twitter.com/isro
        -https://www.facebook.com/ISRO
        -Youtube ISRO Official: https://bit.ly/2Mq0C2y which is currently https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCw5hEVOTfz_AfzsNFWyNlNg



        According to the latest Sep 07, 2019 update: https://www.isro.gov.in/update/07-sep-2019/chandrayaan-2-latest-update Chandrayaan-2 has an extremely nice visible light telescope with a 30 centimeter aperture! At 0.5 microns wavelength, $1.22 lambda / d$ would provide a resolution of about 0.4 arcseconds. At a minimum distance of 100 km that would be a resolution of about 20 cm.




        Chandrayaan-2 mission was a highly complex mission, which represented a significant technological leap compared to the previous missions of ISRO, which brought together an Orbiter, Lander and Rover to explore the unexplored south pole of the Moon. Since the launch of Chandrayaan-2 on July 22, 2019, not only India but the whole world watched its progress from one phase to the next with great expectations and excitement. This was a unique mission which aimed at studying not just one area of the Moon but all the areas combining the exosphere, the surface as well as the sub-surface of the moon in a single mission. The Orbiter has already been placed in its intended orbit around the Moon and shall enrich our understanding of the moon’s evolution and mapping of the minerals and water molecules in the Polar Regions, using its eight state-of-the-art scientific instruments. The Orbiter camera is the highest resolution camera (0.3m) in any lunar mission so far and shall provide high resolution images which will be immensely useful to the global scientific community. The precise launch and mission management has ensured a long life of almost 7 years instead of the planned one year. The Vikram Lander followed the planned descent trajectory from its orbit of 35 km to just below 2 km above the surface. All the systems and sensors of the Lander functioned excellently until this point and proved many new technologies such as variable thrust propulsion technology used in the Lander. The success criteria was defined for each and every phase of the mission and till date 90 to 95% of the mission objectives have been accomplished and will continue contribute to Lunar science , notwithstanding the loss of communication with the Lander.




        It's unusual for the New York Times to get things wrong, but reading carefully they are quoting other news outlets, not K. Silvan directly.






        share|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        Thanks to @jkavalik for the informative answer and helpful links!



        As is pointed out there, there seems to be an abundance of false social media accounts claiming to be K. Silvan.



        From today's Sep 09, 2019 post: Regarding Social Media Accounts in the name of Kailasavadivoo Sivan, Chairman ISRO:




        It has been noted that social media accounts in the name of Kailasavadivoo Sivan (along with photographs of K. Sivan) is operational and active on social media platforms. This is to clarify that K. Sivan, Chairman, ISRO does not have any personal account on any social media platforms. Hence all the information on all such accounts are not authentic.



        The official account of ISRO on all social media platforms are as follows:




        -https://www.twitter.com/isro
        -https://www.facebook.com/ISRO
        -Youtube ISRO Official: https://bit.ly/2Mq0C2y which is currently https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCw5hEVOTfz_AfzsNFWyNlNg



        According to the latest Sep 07, 2019 update: https://www.isro.gov.in/update/07-sep-2019/chandrayaan-2-latest-update Chandrayaan-2 has an extremely nice visible light telescope with a 30 centimeter aperture! At 0.5 microns wavelength, $1.22 lambda / d$ would provide a resolution of about 0.4 arcseconds. At a minimum distance of 100 km that would be a resolution of about 20 cm.




        Chandrayaan-2 mission was a highly complex mission, which represented a significant technological leap compared to the previous missions of ISRO, which brought together an Orbiter, Lander and Rover to explore the unexplored south pole of the Moon. Since the launch of Chandrayaan-2 on July 22, 2019, not only India but the whole world watched its progress from one phase to the next with great expectations and excitement. This was a unique mission which aimed at studying not just one area of the Moon but all the areas combining the exosphere, the surface as well as the sub-surface of the moon in a single mission. The Orbiter has already been placed in its intended orbit around the Moon and shall enrich our understanding of the moon’s evolution and mapping of the minerals and water molecules in the Polar Regions, using its eight state-of-the-art scientific instruments. The Orbiter camera is the highest resolution camera (0.3m) in any lunar mission so far and shall provide high resolution images which will be immensely useful to the global scientific community. The precise launch and mission management has ensured a long life of almost 7 years instead of the planned one year. The Vikram Lander followed the planned descent trajectory from its orbit of 35 km to just below 2 km above the surface. All the systems and sensors of the Lander functioned excellently until this point and proved many new technologies such as variable thrust propulsion technology used in the Lander. The success criteria was defined for each and every phase of the mission and till date 90 to 95% of the mission objectives have been accomplished and will continue contribute to Lunar science , notwithstanding the loss of communication with the Lander.




        It's unusual for the New York Times to get things wrong, but reading carefully they are quoting other news outlets, not K. Silvan directly.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered 11 hours ago









        uhohuhoh

        52.5k24 gold badges205 silver badges670 bronze badges




        52.5k24 gold badges205 silver badges670 bronze badges


































            draft saved

            draft discarded



















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Space Exploration Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fspace.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f38672%2fwhy-would-thermal-imaging-be-used-to-locate-the-chandrayaan-2-lander%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Hudson River Historic District Contents Geography History The district today Aesthetics Cultural...

            The number designs the writing. Feandra Aversely Definition: The act of ingrafting a sprig or shoot of one...

            Ayherre Geografie Demografie Externe links Navigatiemenu43° 23′ NB, 1° 15′ WL43° 23′ NB, 1°...