Simple question about a formula for sumsinequality of sumsFormula of Squaring Sums / IntegralsSolve easy sums...

The Sword in the Stone

Can I make a matrix from just a parts of the cells?

Heisenberg uncertainty principle in daily life

Would this neural network have short term memory?

How much were the LMs maneuvered to their landing points?

Easy way to add a zero to the filename if it need it

Can two figures have the same area, perimeter, and same number of segments have different shape?

3D Statue Park: U shapes

Request for a Latin phrase as motto "God is highest/supreme"

How can I stop myself from micromanaging other PCs' actions?

This message is flooding my syslog, how to find where it comes from?

Does academia have a lazy work culture?

What is the lowest-speed bogey a jet fighter can intercept/escort?

Why isn't there a serious attempt at creating a third mass-appeal party in the US?

Decreasing star size

Is it normal practice to screen share with a client?

Unethical behavior : should I report it?

Commercial jet accompanied by small plane near Seattle

kids pooling money for Lego League and taxes

Why are so many countries still in the Commonwealth?

How to avoid unconsciously copying the style of my favorite writer?

Is it legal to use cash pulled from a credit card to pay the monthly payment on that credit card?

Spoken encryption

How can I receive packages while in France?



Simple question about a formula for sums


inequality of sumsFormula of Squaring Sums / IntegralsSolve easy sums with Binomial CoefficientWhy is this nested sum formula trueUsing a visual “proof” to show that $sum_{n=1}^{infty} left(frac 34 right)^n =1$Does an induction argument work when $n rightarrow infty$?Difficult rearrangement of summation terms to find analytical expressions for cumulant functionsquestion about sequences and seriesCalculate powers of sumsSimple question about Riemann zeta function






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}







1












$begingroup$


Why is
$$
left(sum_{i=1}^{n}a_iright)^2= sum_{i=1}^{n}sum_{j=1}^{n}a_ia_j
$$

I guess it is fairly clear when you do it for $n=2$ for example, but I can't really proof it for all $n$ with induction.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$



















    1












    $begingroup$


    Why is
    $$
    left(sum_{i=1}^{n}a_iright)^2= sum_{i=1}^{n}sum_{j=1}^{n}a_ia_j
    $$

    I guess it is fairly clear when you do it for $n=2$ for example, but I can't really proof it for all $n$ with induction.










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$















      1












      1








      1





      $begingroup$


      Why is
      $$
      left(sum_{i=1}^{n}a_iright)^2= sum_{i=1}^{n}sum_{j=1}^{n}a_ia_j
      $$

      I guess it is fairly clear when you do it for $n=2$ for example, but I can't really proof it for all $n$ with induction.










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      Why is
      $$
      left(sum_{i=1}^{n}a_iright)^2= sum_{i=1}^{n}sum_{j=1}^{n}a_ia_j
      $$

      I guess it is fairly clear when you do it for $n=2$ for example, but I can't really proof it for all $n$ with induction.







      calculus analysis summation






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited 8 hours ago









      saulspatz

      22.2k4 gold badges16 silver badges38 bronze badges




      22.2k4 gold badges16 silver badges38 bronze badges










      asked 8 hours ago









      KingDingelingKingDingeling

      45011 bronze badges




      45011 bronze badges






















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          2












          $begingroup$

          NB: I give a proof by induction in the following. It may be a good exercise in order to practice induction, but the best way to understand the formula really is Saulspatz' point of view.



          We may prove this identity by induction on $n$. We will make use of the base case $n=2$, which you may check by yourself.



          The heredity is given by the following. Let $n>2$ be given and assume that the property holds for $n-1$. Let $a_1,ldots, a_n$ be given real numbers, complex numbers, or elements of any commutative ring. We define $A_1 = a_1+ldots +a_{n-1}$ and $A_2 = a_n$. Using the base case $n=2$, we may write



          $$left(sum_{i=1}^{n}a_iright)^2=(A_1+A_2)^2=A_1^2 + A_1A_2+A_2A_1+A_2^2$$



          Now, the induction hypothesis gives $A_1^2=sum_{i=1}^{n-1}sum_{j=1}^{n-1}a_ia_j$, and $A_2$ is no other than $a_n^2$.



          As for $A_2A_1$, it is $sum_{j=1}^{n-1}a_na_j$. We may see it as the term "$i=n$" in order to regroup it inside the sum defining $A_1^2$. At this point, we have



          $$left(sum_{i=1}^{n}a_iright)^2= sum_{i=1}^{n}sum_{j=1}^{n-1}a_ia_j+A_1A_2+a_n^2$$



          As you may know, because we are considering finite sums, we may invert the order of summations. Thus, this is also



          $$left(sum_{i=1}^{n}a_iright)^2= sum_{j=1}^{n-1}sum_{i=1}^{n}a_ia_j+A_1A_2+a_n^2$$



          But $A_1A_2$ is $sum_{i=1}^{n-1}a_ia_n=left(sum_{i=1}^{n}a_ia_nright)-a_n^2$. Again, we identify the term "$j=n$" so that we may eventually regroup all the terms



          $$left(sum_{i=1}^{n}a_iright)^2= sum_{i=1}^{n}sum_{j=1}^{n}a_ia_j$$



          which is our desired identity.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$





















            4












            $begingroup$

            On the left-hand side we have $$(a_1+a_2+cdots+a_n)(a_1+a_2+cdots+a_n)$$ How do we multiply this out? Pick a term in the first factor and a term in the second factor and multiply them. Add up the products for all possible choices of two terms. That's what the right-hand side says.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$
















              Your Answer








              StackExchange.ready(function() {
              var channelOptions = {
              tags: "".split(" "),
              id: "69"
              };
              initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

              StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
              // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
              if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
              StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
              createEditor();
              });
              }
              else {
              createEditor();
              }
              });

              function createEditor() {
              StackExchange.prepareEditor({
              heartbeatType: 'answer',
              autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
              convertImagesToLinks: true,
              noModals: true,
              showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
              reputationToPostImages: 10,
              bindNavPrevention: true,
              postfix: "",
              imageUploader: {
              brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
              contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
              allowUrls: true
              },
              noCode: true, onDemand: true,
              discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
              ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
              });


              }
              });














              draft saved

              draft discarded


















              StackExchange.ready(
              function () {
              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3305875%2fsimple-question-about-a-formula-for-sums%23new-answer', 'question_page');
              }
              );

              Post as a guest















              Required, but never shown

























              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes








              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes









              active

              oldest

              votes






              active

              oldest

              votes









              2












              $begingroup$

              NB: I give a proof by induction in the following. It may be a good exercise in order to practice induction, but the best way to understand the formula really is Saulspatz' point of view.



              We may prove this identity by induction on $n$. We will make use of the base case $n=2$, which you may check by yourself.



              The heredity is given by the following. Let $n>2$ be given and assume that the property holds for $n-1$. Let $a_1,ldots, a_n$ be given real numbers, complex numbers, or elements of any commutative ring. We define $A_1 = a_1+ldots +a_{n-1}$ and $A_2 = a_n$. Using the base case $n=2$, we may write



              $$left(sum_{i=1}^{n}a_iright)^2=(A_1+A_2)^2=A_1^2 + A_1A_2+A_2A_1+A_2^2$$



              Now, the induction hypothesis gives $A_1^2=sum_{i=1}^{n-1}sum_{j=1}^{n-1}a_ia_j$, and $A_2$ is no other than $a_n^2$.



              As for $A_2A_1$, it is $sum_{j=1}^{n-1}a_na_j$. We may see it as the term "$i=n$" in order to regroup it inside the sum defining $A_1^2$. At this point, we have



              $$left(sum_{i=1}^{n}a_iright)^2= sum_{i=1}^{n}sum_{j=1}^{n-1}a_ia_j+A_1A_2+a_n^2$$



              As you may know, because we are considering finite sums, we may invert the order of summations. Thus, this is also



              $$left(sum_{i=1}^{n}a_iright)^2= sum_{j=1}^{n-1}sum_{i=1}^{n}a_ia_j+A_1A_2+a_n^2$$



              But $A_1A_2$ is $sum_{i=1}^{n-1}a_ia_n=left(sum_{i=1}^{n}a_ia_nright)-a_n^2$. Again, we identify the term "$j=n$" so that we may eventually regroup all the terms



              $$left(sum_{i=1}^{n}a_iright)^2= sum_{i=1}^{n}sum_{j=1}^{n}a_ia_j$$



              which is our desired identity.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$


















                2












                $begingroup$

                NB: I give a proof by induction in the following. It may be a good exercise in order to practice induction, but the best way to understand the formula really is Saulspatz' point of view.



                We may prove this identity by induction on $n$. We will make use of the base case $n=2$, which you may check by yourself.



                The heredity is given by the following. Let $n>2$ be given and assume that the property holds for $n-1$. Let $a_1,ldots, a_n$ be given real numbers, complex numbers, or elements of any commutative ring. We define $A_1 = a_1+ldots +a_{n-1}$ and $A_2 = a_n$. Using the base case $n=2$, we may write



                $$left(sum_{i=1}^{n}a_iright)^2=(A_1+A_2)^2=A_1^2 + A_1A_2+A_2A_1+A_2^2$$



                Now, the induction hypothesis gives $A_1^2=sum_{i=1}^{n-1}sum_{j=1}^{n-1}a_ia_j$, and $A_2$ is no other than $a_n^2$.



                As for $A_2A_1$, it is $sum_{j=1}^{n-1}a_na_j$. We may see it as the term "$i=n$" in order to regroup it inside the sum defining $A_1^2$. At this point, we have



                $$left(sum_{i=1}^{n}a_iright)^2= sum_{i=1}^{n}sum_{j=1}^{n-1}a_ia_j+A_1A_2+a_n^2$$



                As you may know, because we are considering finite sums, we may invert the order of summations. Thus, this is also



                $$left(sum_{i=1}^{n}a_iright)^2= sum_{j=1}^{n-1}sum_{i=1}^{n}a_ia_j+A_1A_2+a_n^2$$



                But $A_1A_2$ is $sum_{i=1}^{n-1}a_ia_n=left(sum_{i=1}^{n}a_ia_nright)-a_n^2$. Again, we identify the term "$j=n$" so that we may eventually regroup all the terms



                $$left(sum_{i=1}^{n}a_iright)^2= sum_{i=1}^{n}sum_{j=1}^{n}a_ia_j$$



                which is our desired identity.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$
















                  2












                  2








                  2





                  $begingroup$

                  NB: I give a proof by induction in the following. It may be a good exercise in order to practice induction, but the best way to understand the formula really is Saulspatz' point of view.



                  We may prove this identity by induction on $n$. We will make use of the base case $n=2$, which you may check by yourself.



                  The heredity is given by the following. Let $n>2$ be given and assume that the property holds for $n-1$. Let $a_1,ldots, a_n$ be given real numbers, complex numbers, or elements of any commutative ring. We define $A_1 = a_1+ldots +a_{n-1}$ and $A_2 = a_n$. Using the base case $n=2$, we may write



                  $$left(sum_{i=1}^{n}a_iright)^2=(A_1+A_2)^2=A_1^2 + A_1A_2+A_2A_1+A_2^2$$



                  Now, the induction hypothesis gives $A_1^2=sum_{i=1}^{n-1}sum_{j=1}^{n-1}a_ia_j$, and $A_2$ is no other than $a_n^2$.



                  As for $A_2A_1$, it is $sum_{j=1}^{n-1}a_na_j$. We may see it as the term "$i=n$" in order to regroup it inside the sum defining $A_1^2$. At this point, we have



                  $$left(sum_{i=1}^{n}a_iright)^2= sum_{i=1}^{n}sum_{j=1}^{n-1}a_ia_j+A_1A_2+a_n^2$$



                  As you may know, because we are considering finite sums, we may invert the order of summations. Thus, this is also



                  $$left(sum_{i=1}^{n}a_iright)^2= sum_{j=1}^{n-1}sum_{i=1}^{n}a_ia_j+A_1A_2+a_n^2$$



                  But $A_1A_2$ is $sum_{i=1}^{n-1}a_ia_n=left(sum_{i=1}^{n}a_ia_nright)-a_n^2$. Again, we identify the term "$j=n$" so that we may eventually regroup all the terms



                  $$left(sum_{i=1}^{n}a_iright)^2= sum_{i=1}^{n}sum_{j=1}^{n}a_ia_j$$



                  which is our desired identity.






                  share|cite|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$



                  NB: I give a proof by induction in the following. It may be a good exercise in order to practice induction, but the best way to understand the formula really is Saulspatz' point of view.



                  We may prove this identity by induction on $n$. We will make use of the base case $n=2$, which you may check by yourself.



                  The heredity is given by the following. Let $n>2$ be given and assume that the property holds for $n-1$. Let $a_1,ldots, a_n$ be given real numbers, complex numbers, or elements of any commutative ring. We define $A_1 = a_1+ldots +a_{n-1}$ and $A_2 = a_n$. Using the base case $n=2$, we may write



                  $$left(sum_{i=1}^{n}a_iright)^2=(A_1+A_2)^2=A_1^2 + A_1A_2+A_2A_1+A_2^2$$



                  Now, the induction hypothesis gives $A_1^2=sum_{i=1}^{n-1}sum_{j=1}^{n-1}a_ia_j$, and $A_2$ is no other than $a_n^2$.



                  As for $A_2A_1$, it is $sum_{j=1}^{n-1}a_na_j$. We may see it as the term "$i=n$" in order to regroup it inside the sum defining $A_1^2$. At this point, we have



                  $$left(sum_{i=1}^{n}a_iright)^2= sum_{i=1}^{n}sum_{j=1}^{n-1}a_ia_j+A_1A_2+a_n^2$$



                  As you may know, because we are considering finite sums, we may invert the order of summations. Thus, this is also



                  $$left(sum_{i=1}^{n}a_iright)^2= sum_{j=1}^{n-1}sum_{i=1}^{n}a_ia_j+A_1A_2+a_n^2$$



                  But $A_1A_2$ is $sum_{i=1}^{n-1}a_ia_n=left(sum_{i=1}^{n}a_ia_nright)-a_n^2$. Again, we identify the term "$j=n$" so that we may eventually regroup all the terms



                  $$left(sum_{i=1}^{n}a_iright)^2= sum_{i=1}^{n}sum_{j=1}^{n}a_ia_j$$



                  which is our desired identity.







                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  answered 8 hours ago









                  SuzetSuzet

                  2,8326 silver badges27 bronze badges




                  2,8326 silver badges27 bronze badges

























                      4












                      $begingroup$

                      On the left-hand side we have $$(a_1+a_2+cdots+a_n)(a_1+a_2+cdots+a_n)$$ How do we multiply this out? Pick a term in the first factor and a term in the second factor and multiply them. Add up the products for all possible choices of two terms. That's what the right-hand side says.






                      share|cite|improve this answer









                      $endgroup$


















                        4












                        $begingroup$

                        On the left-hand side we have $$(a_1+a_2+cdots+a_n)(a_1+a_2+cdots+a_n)$$ How do we multiply this out? Pick a term in the first factor and a term in the second factor and multiply them. Add up the products for all possible choices of two terms. That's what the right-hand side says.






                        share|cite|improve this answer









                        $endgroup$
















                          4












                          4








                          4





                          $begingroup$

                          On the left-hand side we have $$(a_1+a_2+cdots+a_n)(a_1+a_2+cdots+a_n)$$ How do we multiply this out? Pick a term in the first factor and a term in the second factor and multiply them. Add up the products for all possible choices of two terms. That's what the right-hand side says.






                          share|cite|improve this answer









                          $endgroup$



                          On the left-hand side we have $$(a_1+a_2+cdots+a_n)(a_1+a_2+cdots+a_n)$$ How do we multiply this out? Pick a term in the first factor and a term in the second factor and multiply them. Add up the products for all possible choices of two terms. That's what the right-hand side says.







                          share|cite|improve this answer












                          share|cite|improve this answer



                          share|cite|improve this answer










                          answered 8 hours ago









                          saulspatzsaulspatz

                          22.2k4 gold badges16 silver badges38 bronze badges




                          22.2k4 gold badges16 silver badges38 bronze badges






























                              draft saved

                              draft discarded




















































                              Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                              • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                              But avoid



                              • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                              • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                              Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                              To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                              draft saved


                              draft discarded














                              StackExchange.ready(
                              function () {
                              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3305875%2fsimple-question-about-a-formula-for-sums%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                              }
                              );

                              Post as a guest















                              Required, but never shown





















































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown

































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown







                              Popular posts from this blog

                              Taj Mahal Inhaltsverzeichnis Aufbau | Geschichte | 350-Jahr-Feier | Heutige Bedeutung | Siehe auch |...

                              Baia Sprie Cuprins Etimologie | Istorie | Demografie | Politică și administrație | Arii naturale...

                              Nicolae Petrescu-Găină Cuprins Biografie | Opera | In memoriam | Varia | Controverse, incertitudini...