How to measure if Scrum Master is making a difference and when to give upCan the PRINCE2 and Scrum Master...
Icon is not displayed in lwc
How could Tony Stark wield the Infinity Nano Gauntlet - at all?
What's the point of writing that I know will never be used or read?
How to use the passive form to say "This flower was watered."
Eric Andre had a dream
What should I do with the stock I own if I anticipate there will be a recession?
Can I submit a paper computer science conference using an alias if using my real name can cause legal trouble in my original country
From where do electrons gain kinetic energy through a circuit?
How do I cope with haze for the photos containing sky and trees at a distance?
global variant of csname…endcsname
Units of measurement, especially length, when body parts vary in size among races
Why does this image of cyclocarbon look like a nonagon?
How do I answer an interview question about how to handle a hard deadline I won't be able to meet?
Pocket Clarketech
Did Michelle Obama have a staff of 23; and Melania have a staff of 4?
Radix2 Fast Fourier Transform implemented in C++
Do I need to start off my book by describing the character's "normal world"?
What if a restaurant suddenly cannot accept credit cards, and the customer has no cash?
Have there ever been other TV shows or Films that told a similiar story to the new 90210 show?
May the tower use the runway while an emergency aircraft is inbound?
Unconventional examples of mathematical modelling
Replacing old plug-in 220V range with new hardwire 3-wire electric cooktop: remove outlet or add a plug?
What does a comma signify in inorganic chemistry?
Would getting a natural 20 with a penalty still count as a critical hit?
How to measure if Scrum Master is making a difference and when to give up
Can the PRINCE2 and Scrum Master Certificates be claimed as Contact Hours?What tools and techniques should be introduced first when starting with Agile/Scrum?Change from software developer to scrum master?Who should decide about changes in the process - Scrum Master or the whole Scrum Team?Developers in Scrum Team: ineffective and not functionalHow should a Scrum Master handle high cycle times from individuals on a team?What have you found is the most effective way of training a Scrum Master?How to fill my day as a Scrum Master?Not sure what value the Scrum Master role adds over a long period of time?How should Scrum and Kanban teams track Continuous Improvement activities?
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}
I have been working with a Scrum Team and also a Kanban team for about 6 months and 10 months respectively.
The Scrum team hasn't shown any improvement and I haven't really managed to impact the management of the team either.
As a Scrum Master, is there anyway I can measure whether I have made any impact and when I should consider giving up?
scrum agile scrum-master agile-coach
add a comment |
I have been working with a Scrum Team and also a Kanban team for about 6 months and 10 months respectively.
The Scrum team hasn't shown any improvement and I haven't really managed to impact the management of the team either.
As a Scrum Master, is there anyway I can measure whether I have made any impact and when I should consider giving up?
scrum agile scrum-master agile-coach
4
when you say the "the Scrum team hasn't shown any improvement", what are you trying to improve? Velocity, reduction of bugs, the team hates each other still?
– NKCampbell
2 days ago
add a comment |
I have been working with a Scrum Team and also a Kanban team for about 6 months and 10 months respectively.
The Scrum team hasn't shown any improvement and I haven't really managed to impact the management of the team either.
As a Scrum Master, is there anyway I can measure whether I have made any impact and when I should consider giving up?
scrum agile scrum-master agile-coach
I have been working with a Scrum Team and also a Kanban team for about 6 months and 10 months respectively.
The Scrum team hasn't shown any improvement and I haven't really managed to impact the management of the team either.
As a Scrum Master, is there anyway I can measure whether I have made any impact and when I should consider giving up?
scrum agile scrum-master agile-coach
scrum agile scrum-master agile-coach
asked 2 days ago
user32613user32613
6873 silver badges13 bronze badges
6873 silver badges13 bronze badges
4
when you say the "the Scrum team hasn't shown any improvement", what are you trying to improve? Velocity, reduction of bugs, the team hates each other still?
– NKCampbell
2 days ago
add a comment |
4
when you say the "the Scrum team hasn't shown any improvement", what are you trying to improve? Velocity, reduction of bugs, the team hates each other still?
– NKCampbell
2 days ago
4
4
when you say the "the Scrum team hasn't shown any improvement", what are you trying to improve? Velocity, reduction of bugs, the team hates each other still?
– NKCampbell
2 days ago
when you say the "the Scrum team hasn't shown any improvement", what are you trying to improve? Velocity, reduction of bugs, the team hates each other still?
– NKCampbell
2 days ago
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
The key to team improvement is good retrospectives.
When I started running retrospectives, I found they often just degenerated into whingeing sessions that didn't achieve much, other than giving the team an opportunity to vent our frustrations.
Now I go into the retrospective with a clear goal, stated at the beginning of each one:
We're here to find what we, the team, most want to improve, and decide on how we'll do that.
I keep tight time-boxes on the main phases:
- Summarise what happened in the sprint.
- Individually, write good/bad/ugly memories on stickies.
- As a team, group the stickies into themes, and pick the most important one (possibly two, but no more).
- Brainstorm ideas for the improvement activity (i.e. sustain a good thing, or reduce a bad thing).
- Refine the best ideas so that they are concrete actions with a result you can measure (look up SMART criteria if you haven't already).
Remember, as a Scrum Master, your role isn't necessarily to make the improvements yourself; the key trait is to facilitate the team. So the important thing is ensuring that the Retrospective takes place, and kept on track towards its outputs (the improvement activities).
Once you have the improvement activities agreed, then the Scrum Master can be monitoring the agreed metric, and checking that the improvement activity is actually happening. This can involve reminding team members of what they agreed to do in the meeting; I find it helpful to have the list of improvement actions visible in the stand-up area, so that we are all reminded of them every day, and can have a quick check of our progress towards them as well as to our sprint goals.
2
To this end, the purpose of a retrospective is not to complain about what happened last sprint. A retrospective's purpose is for the team to learn how to do better going forward, and it happens to focus on what happened last sprint.
– Cort Ammon
yesterday
add a comment |
There are many things you can do, but the first thing I would start with is a coaching agreement. I've seen very simple and very complex coaching agreements, but all of them hit a few key points:
- How will the coach work with those being coached?
- What do those being coached want to improve on?
- Do we understand and acknowledge that the coach can't improve for the team or leaders - they can only help accelerate their own improvements?
This gives you something to refer back to when people are 'too busy' for coaching. It also tells you where people are open to improvement so you can focus your efforts there.
After this, I recommend creating a regular cadence of coaching and improvement. For a scrum team, the sprint cycle works well with the retro at the end of it. Each retro should have 1 (or 2 tops) action item. It isn't required, but I always recommend that an action item specifies the thing that's happening that is either challenging and they want to improve or good and they want to capitalize on; what the action item is; how they think it will improve the situation; and how they will measure that improvement.
And now you have measurable improvement...
You don't have to stop here. You can also build a coaching wall (pull your fellow Scrum Masters into this). Over 5 or 6 weeks, keep a running set of notes on what you're helping your team with. This builds a narrative of how you've helped the team improve. If you do it with other Scrum Masters and teams, you can also pick up on common trends across the organization.
add a comment |
Having made an impact is a very broad, undefined statement. There are soft elements (team morale, engagement, ...), delivery elements (what have the teams delivery and in what fashion) and there are hard data facts.
I feel the first 2 are already covered in the answers above - what I am missing is what kind of hard evidence (metrics) have you identified to potentially quantify impact. For instance, metrics around:
- Is our delivery capability improving?
- Where are my delivery risks?
- How accurate are my estimates on delivery?
- Are my teams collaborating to ensure quality and avoid risks?
- Which capabilities/teams/partners are causing delays and issues? Are they repetitive?
- Are we becoming more Agile?
These are some of the questions scrum, delivery & team managers we work with look at.
New contributor
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "208"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpm.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f27013%2fhow-to-measure-if-scrum-master-is-making-a-difference-and-when-to-give-up%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
The key to team improvement is good retrospectives.
When I started running retrospectives, I found they often just degenerated into whingeing sessions that didn't achieve much, other than giving the team an opportunity to vent our frustrations.
Now I go into the retrospective with a clear goal, stated at the beginning of each one:
We're here to find what we, the team, most want to improve, and decide on how we'll do that.
I keep tight time-boxes on the main phases:
- Summarise what happened in the sprint.
- Individually, write good/bad/ugly memories on stickies.
- As a team, group the stickies into themes, and pick the most important one (possibly two, but no more).
- Brainstorm ideas for the improvement activity (i.e. sustain a good thing, or reduce a bad thing).
- Refine the best ideas so that they are concrete actions with a result you can measure (look up SMART criteria if you haven't already).
Remember, as a Scrum Master, your role isn't necessarily to make the improvements yourself; the key trait is to facilitate the team. So the important thing is ensuring that the Retrospective takes place, and kept on track towards its outputs (the improvement activities).
Once you have the improvement activities agreed, then the Scrum Master can be monitoring the agreed metric, and checking that the improvement activity is actually happening. This can involve reminding team members of what they agreed to do in the meeting; I find it helpful to have the list of improvement actions visible in the stand-up area, so that we are all reminded of them every day, and can have a quick check of our progress towards them as well as to our sprint goals.
2
To this end, the purpose of a retrospective is not to complain about what happened last sprint. A retrospective's purpose is for the team to learn how to do better going forward, and it happens to focus on what happened last sprint.
– Cort Ammon
yesterday
add a comment |
The key to team improvement is good retrospectives.
When I started running retrospectives, I found they often just degenerated into whingeing sessions that didn't achieve much, other than giving the team an opportunity to vent our frustrations.
Now I go into the retrospective with a clear goal, stated at the beginning of each one:
We're here to find what we, the team, most want to improve, and decide on how we'll do that.
I keep tight time-boxes on the main phases:
- Summarise what happened in the sprint.
- Individually, write good/bad/ugly memories on stickies.
- As a team, group the stickies into themes, and pick the most important one (possibly two, but no more).
- Brainstorm ideas for the improvement activity (i.e. sustain a good thing, or reduce a bad thing).
- Refine the best ideas so that they are concrete actions with a result you can measure (look up SMART criteria if you haven't already).
Remember, as a Scrum Master, your role isn't necessarily to make the improvements yourself; the key trait is to facilitate the team. So the important thing is ensuring that the Retrospective takes place, and kept on track towards its outputs (the improvement activities).
Once you have the improvement activities agreed, then the Scrum Master can be monitoring the agreed metric, and checking that the improvement activity is actually happening. This can involve reminding team members of what they agreed to do in the meeting; I find it helpful to have the list of improvement actions visible in the stand-up area, so that we are all reminded of them every day, and can have a quick check of our progress towards them as well as to our sprint goals.
2
To this end, the purpose of a retrospective is not to complain about what happened last sprint. A retrospective's purpose is for the team to learn how to do better going forward, and it happens to focus on what happened last sprint.
– Cort Ammon
yesterday
add a comment |
The key to team improvement is good retrospectives.
When I started running retrospectives, I found they often just degenerated into whingeing sessions that didn't achieve much, other than giving the team an opportunity to vent our frustrations.
Now I go into the retrospective with a clear goal, stated at the beginning of each one:
We're here to find what we, the team, most want to improve, and decide on how we'll do that.
I keep tight time-boxes on the main phases:
- Summarise what happened in the sprint.
- Individually, write good/bad/ugly memories on stickies.
- As a team, group the stickies into themes, and pick the most important one (possibly two, but no more).
- Brainstorm ideas for the improvement activity (i.e. sustain a good thing, or reduce a bad thing).
- Refine the best ideas so that they are concrete actions with a result you can measure (look up SMART criteria if you haven't already).
Remember, as a Scrum Master, your role isn't necessarily to make the improvements yourself; the key trait is to facilitate the team. So the important thing is ensuring that the Retrospective takes place, and kept on track towards its outputs (the improvement activities).
Once you have the improvement activities agreed, then the Scrum Master can be monitoring the agreed metric, and checking that the improvement activity is actually happening. This can involve reminding team members of what they agreed to do in the meeting; I find it helpful to have the list of improvement actions visible in the stand-up area, so that we are all reminded of them every day, and can have a quick check of our progress towards them as well as to our sprint goals.
The key to team improvement is good retrospectives.
When I started running retrospectives, I found they often just degenerated into whingeing sessions that didn't achieve much, other than giving the team an opportunity to vent our frustrations.
Now I go into the retrospective with a clear goal, stated at the beginning of each one:
We're here to find what we, the team, most want to improve, and decide on how we'll do that.
I keep tight time-boxes on the main phases:
- Summarise what happened in the sprint.
- Individually, write good/bad/ugly memories on stickies.
- As a team, group the stickies into themes, and pick the most important one (possibly two, but no more).
- Brainstorm ideas for the improvement activity (i.e. sustain a good thing, or reduce a bad thing).
- Refine the best ideas so that they are concrete actions with a result you can measure (look up SMART criteria if you haven't already).
Remember, as a Scrum Master, your role isn't necessarily to make the improvements yourself; the key trait is to facilitate the team. So the important thing is ensuring that the Retrospective takes place, and kept on track towards its outputs (the improvement activities).
Once you have the improvement activities agreed, then the Scrum Master can be monitoring the agreed metric, and checking that the improvement activity is actually happening. This can involve reminding team members of what they agreed to do in the meeting; I find it helpful to have the list of improvement actions visible in the stand-up area, so that we are all reminded of them every day, and can have a quick check of our progress towards them as well as to our sprint goals.
answered 2 days ago
Toby SpeightToby Speight
2608 bronze badges
2608 bronze badges
2
To this end, the purpose of a retrospective is not to complain about what happened last sprint. A retrospective's purpose is for the team to learn how to do better going forward, and it happens to focus on what happened last sprint.
– Cort Ammon
yesterday
add a comment |
2
To this end, the purpose of a retrospective is not to complain about what happened last sprint. A retrospective's purpose is for the team to learn how to do better going forward, and it happens to focus on what happened last sprint.
– Cort Ammon
yesterday
2
2
To this end, the purpose of a retrospective is not to complain about what happened last sprint. A retrospective's purpose is for the team to learn how to do better going forward, and it happens to focus on what happened last sprint.
– Cort Ammon
yesterday
To this end, the purpose of a retrospective is not to complain about what happened last sprint. A retrospective's purpose is for the team to learn how to do better going forward, and it happens to focus on what happened last sprint.
– Cort Ammon
yesterday
add a comment |
There are many things you can do, but the first thing I would start with is a coaching agreement. I've seen very simple and very complex coaching agreements, but all of them hit a few key points:
- How will the coach work with those being coached?
- What do those being coached want to improve on?
- Do we understand and acknowledge that the coach can't improve for the team or leaders - they can only help accelerate their own improvements?
This gives you something to refer back to when people are 'too busy' for coaching. It also tells you where people are open to improvement so you can focus your efforts there.
After this, I recommend creating a regular cadence of coaching and improvement. For a scrum team, the sprint cycle works well with the retro at the end of it. Each retro should have 1 (or 2 tops) action item. It isn't required, but I always recommend that an action item specifies the thing that's happening that is either challenging and they want to improve or good and they want to capitalize on; what the action item is; how they think it will improve the situation; and how they will measure that improvement.
And now you have measurable improvement...
You don't have to stop here. You can also build a coaching wall (pull your fellow Scrum Masters into this). Over 5 or 6 weeks, keep a running set of notes on what you're helping your team with. This builds a narrative of how you've helped the team improve. If you do it with other Scrum Masters and teams, you can also pick up on common trends across the organization.
add a comment |
There are many things you can do, but the first thing I would start with is a coaching agreement. I've seen very simple and very complex coaching agreements, but all of them hit a few key points:
- How will the coach work with those being coached?
- What do those being coached want to improve on?
- Do we understand and acknowledge that the coach can't improve for the team or leaders - they can only help accelerate their own improvements?
This gives you something to refer back to when people are 'too busy' for coaching. It also tells you where people are open to improvement so you can focus your efforts there.
After this, I recommend creating a regular cadence of coaching and improvement. For a scrum team, the sprint cycle works well with the retro at the end of it. Each retro should have 1 (or 2 tops) action item. It isn't required, but I always recommend that an action item specifies the thing that's happening that is either challenging and they want to improve or good and they want to capitalize on; what the action item is; how they think it will improve the situation; and how they will measure that improvement.
And now you have measurable improvement...
You don't have to stop here. You can also build a coaching wall (pull your fellow Scrum Masters into this). Over 5 or 6 weeks, keep a running set of notes on what you're helping your team with. This builds a narrative of how you've helped the team improve. If you do it with other Scrum Masters and teams, you can also pick up on common trends across the organization.
add a comment |
There are many things you can do, but the first thing I would start with is a coaching agreement. I've seen very simple and very complex coaching agreements, but all of them hit a few key points:
- How will the coach work with those being coached?
- What do those being coached want to improve on?
- Do we understand and acknowledge that the coach can't improve for the team or leaders - they can only help accelerate their own improvements?
This gives you something to refer back to when people are 'too busy' for coaching. It also tells you where people are open to improvement so you can focus your efforts there.
After this, I recommend creating a regular cadence of coaching and improvement. For a scrum team, the sprint cycle works well with the retro at the end of it. Each retro should have 1 (or 2 tops) action item. It isn't required, but I always recommend that an action item specifies the thing that's happening that is either challenging and they want to improve or good and they want to capitalize on; what the action item is; how they think it will improve the situation; and how they will measure that improvement.
And now you have measurable improvement...
You don't have to stop here. You can also build a coaching wall (pull your fellow Scrum Masters into this). Over 5 or 6 weeks, keep a running set of notes on what you're helping your team with. This builds a narrative of how you've helped the team improve. If you do it with other Scrum Masters and teams, you can also pick up on common trends across the organization.
There are many things you can do, but the first thing I would start with is a coaching agreement. I've seen very simple and very complex coaching agreements, but all of them hit a few key points:
- How will the coach work with those being coached?
- What do those being coached want to improve on?
- Do we understand and acknowledge that the coach can't improve for the team or leaders - they can only help accelerate their own improvements?
This gives you something to refer back to when people are 'too busy' for coaching. It also tells you where people are open to improvement so you can focus your efforts there.
After this, I recommend creating a regular cadence of coaching and improvement. For a scrum team, the sprint cycle works well with the retro at the end of it. Each retro should have 1 (or 2 tops) action item. It isn't required, but I always recommend that an action item specifies the thing that's happening that is either challenging and they want to improve or good and they want to capitalize on; what the action item is; how they think it will improve the situation; and how they will measure that improvement.
And now you have measurable improvement...
You don't have to stop here. You can also build a coaching wall (pull your fellow Scrum Masters into this). Over 5 or 6 weeks, keep a running set of notes on what you're helping your team with. This builds a narrative of how you've helped the team improve. If you do it with other Scrum Masters and teams, you can also pick up on common trends across the organization.
answered 2 days ago
DanielDaniel
11.2k2 gold badges13 silver badges31 bronze badges
11.2k2 gold badges13 silver badges31 bronze badges
add a comment |
add a comment |
Having made an impact is a very broad, undefined statement. There are soft elements (team morale, engagement, ...), delivery elements (what have the teams delivery and in what fashion) and there are hard data facts.
I feel the first 2 are already covered in the answers above - what I am missing is what kind of hard evidence (metrics) have you identified to potentially quantify impact. For instance, metrics around:
- Is our delivery capability improving?
- Where are my delivery risks?
- How accurate are my estimates on delivery?
- Are my teams collaborating to ensure quality and avoid risks?
- Which capabilities/teams/partners are causing delays and issues? Are they repetitive?
- Are we becoming more Agile?
These are some of the questions scrum, delivery & team managers we work with look at.
New contributor
add a comment |
Having made an impact is a very broad, undefined statement. There are soft elements (team morale, engagement, ...), delivery elements (what have the teams delivery and in what fashion) and there are hard data facts.
I feel the first 2 are already covered in the answers above - what I am missing is what kind of hard evidence (metrics) have you identified to potentially quantify impact. For instance, metrics around:
- Is our delivery capability improving?
- Where are my delivery risks?
- How accurate are my estimates on delivery?
- Are my teams collaborating to ensure quality and avoid risks?
- Which capabilities/teams/partners are causing delays and issues? Are they repetitive?
- Are we becoming more Agile?
These are some of the questions scrum, delivery & team managers we work with look at.
New contributor
add a comment |
Having made an impact is a very broad, undefined statement. There are soft elements (team morale, engagement, ...), delivery elements (what have the teams delivery and in what fashion) and there are hard data facts.
I feel the first 2 are already covered in the answers above - what I am missing is what kind of hard evidence (metrics) have you identified to potentially quantify impact. For instance, metrics around:
- Is our delivery capability improving?
- Where are my delivery risks?
- How accurate are my estimates on delivery?
- Are my teams collaborating to ensure quality and avoid risks?
- Which capabilities/teams/partners are causing delays and issues? Are they repetitive?
- Are we becoming more Agile?
These are some of the questions scrum, delivery & team managers we work with look at.
New contributor
Having made an impact is a very broad, undefined statement. There are soft elements (team morale, engagement, ...), delivery elements (what have the teams delivery and in what fashion) and there are hard data facts.
I feel the first 2 are already covered in the answers above - what I am missing is what kind of hard evidence (metrics) have you identified to potentially quantify impact. For instance, metrics around:
- Is our delivery capability improving?
- Where are my delivery risks?
- How accurate are my estimates on delivery?
- Are my teams collaborating to ensure quality and avoid risks?
- Which capabilities/teams/partners are causing delays and issues? Are they repetitive?
- Are we becoming more Agile?
These are some of the questions scrum, delivery & team managers we work with look at.
New contributor
New contributor
answered yesterday
Davy NysDavy Nys
1
1
New contributor
New contributor
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Project Management Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpm.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f27013%2fhow-to-measure-if-scrum-master-is-making-a-difference-and-when-to-give-up%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
4
when you say the "the Scrum team hasn't shown any improvement", what are you trying to improve? Velocity, reduction of bugs, the team hates each other still?
– NKCampbell
2 days ago