Who is the controller of a Pacifism enchanting my creature?If a permanent turns into a(nother) creature, has...
How could Tony Stark wield the Infinity Nano Gauntlet - at all?
Subgroup generated by a subgroup and a conjugate of it
What would cause a nuclear power plant to break down after 2000 years, but not sooner?
My new Acer Aspire 7 doesn't have a Legacy Boot option, what can I do to get it?
Compute the square root of a positive integer using binary search
Why was ramjet fuel used as hydraulic fluid during Saturn V checkout?
What was the intention with the Commodore 128?
If it isn't [someone's name]!
What's a good pattern to calculate a variable only when it is used the first time?
Rotate List by K places
Gofer work in exchange for Letter of Recommendation
What are some tips and tricks for finding the cheapest flight when luggage and other fees are not revealed until far into the booking process?
Unconventional examples of mathematical modelling
What is the opposite of "hunger level"?
A Magic Diamond
Polar contour plot in Mathematica?
Meaning and structure of headline "Hair it is: A List of ..."
What exactly happened to the 18 crew members who were reported as "missing" in "Q Who"?
Heyawacky: Ace of Cups
Can anybody tell me who this Pokemon is?
What is the best way to use errors in mathematica M12?
Best model for precedence constraints within scheduling problem
Unsolved Problems due to Lack of Computational Power
Output with the same length always
Who is the controller of a Pacifism enchanting my creature?
If a permanent turns into a(nother) creature, has it entered the battlefield?Ordeal of Heliod and changing creature controlLeyline of the Void and exiling stolen permanentsWho is “You” when the creature controller is not the owner?How do Aether Rift and Library of Leng interact?Can you sacrifice Animate Dead AND the creature it enchants?Rescue from the Underworld on an unearthed creatureWhat happens to auras that come back from exile?What happens when a reanimated creature returns from exile?Under which controller does a stolen permanent come into play after being exiled?
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}
My opponent played Pacifism on a creature on my side of the battlefield. Later, I wanted to exile the enchantment with Conclave Tribunal.
My opponent had the opinion that I was now the controller of Pacifism, so I couldn't exile this enchantment with Conclave Tribunal.
I assumed that I could because I thought he was the controller of Pacifism. Who is right here?
magic-the-gathering
add a comment |
My opponent played Pacifism on a creature on my side of the battlefield. Later, I wanted to exile the enchantment with Conclave Tribunal.
My opponent had the opinion that I was now the controller of Pacifism, so I couldn't exile this enchantment with Conclave Tribunal.
I assumed that I could because I thought he was the controller of Pacifism. Who is right here?
magic-the-gathering
add a comment |
My opponent played Pacifism on a creature on my side of the battlefield. Later, I wanted to exile the enchantment with Conclave Tribunal.
My opponent had the opinion that I was now the controller of Pacifism, so I couldn't exile this enchantment with Conclave Tribunal.
I assumed that I could because I thought he was the controller of Pacifism. Who is right here?
magic-the-gathering
My opponent played Pacifism on a creature on my side of the battlefield. Later, I wanted to exile the enchantment with Conclave Tribunal.
My opponent had the opinion that I was now the controller of Pacifism, so I couldn't exile this enchantment with Conclave Tribunal.
I assumed that I could because I thought he was the controller of Pacifism. Who is right here?
magic-the-gathering
magic-the-gathering
edited 2 days ago
Glorfindel
13.8k1 gold badge44 silver badges77 bronze badges
13.8k1 gold badge44 silver badges77 bronze badges
asked 2 days ago
kristiankristian
2651 silver badge6 bronze badges
2651 silver badge6 bronze badges
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
The controller of an aura is the player who cast it, not (necessarily) the controller of the permanent it enchants. A subsequent control changing effect, like Donate, can change this, but they're relatively rare.
So you're right, you can target Pacifism with Conclave Tribunal and exile it.
add a comment |
As Glorfindel pointed out, although pacifism is enchanted on a creature you control, your opponent controls it, and you can target it with Conclave Tribunal. If we look at another example, it becomes much more obvious how this interaction works.
Take mind control. It has two instructions:
Enchant Creature, same as pacifism.
You control enchanted creature.
Here, 'you' refers to the controller of the mind control. It would make very little sense if you controlled the enchantment when your creature was enchanted, since that would cause Mind Control to be almost useless. Instead, the controller of the mind control controls the creature. Similarly, if you were to give control of a mind control you control to another player, such as with Donate, they would also gain control of the creature it targets.
Apologies for using the word 'control' so many times.
3
All correct, but a card can be owned by one player and controlled by another; who controls a card can be changed by cards like Mind Control, the "owner" cannot be changed by any card or effect (at least since ANTE went away). So "your opponent owns it" in the first sentence is correct, but "your opponent both owns and controls it" would make more sense in this context.
– BradC
2 days ago
Thanks for the catch. I originally wrote 'owns' all over the place and realized that that's misleading in the context.
– Aetherfox
2 days ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "147"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fboardgames.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f48263%2fwho-is-the-controller-of-a-pacifism-enchanting-my-creature%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
The controller of an aura is the player who cast it, not (necessarily) the controller of the permanent it enchants. A subsequent control changing effect, like Donate, can change this, but they're relatively rare.
So you're right, you can target Pacifism with Conclave Tribunal and exile it.
add a comment |
The controller of an aura is the player who cast it, not (necessarily) the controller of the permanent it enchants. A subsequent control changing effect, like Donate, can change this, but they're relatively rare.
So you're right, you can target Pacifism with Conclave Tribunal and exile it.
add a comment |
The controller of an aura is the player who cast it, not (necessarily) the controller of the permanent it enchants. A subsequent control changing effect, like Donate, can change this, but they're relatively rare.
So you're right, you can target Pacifism with Conclave Tribunal and exile it.
The controller of an aura is the player who cast it, not (necessarily) the controller of the permanent it enchants. A subsequent control changing effect, like Donate, can change this, but they're relatively rare.
So you're right, you can target Pacifism with Conclave Tribunal and exile it.
answered 2 days ago
GlorfindelGlorfindel
13.8k1 gold badge44 silver badges77 bronze badges
13.8k1 gold badge44 silver badges77 bronze badges
add a comment |
add a comment |
As Glorfindel pointed out, although pacifism is enchanted on a creature you control, your opponent controls it, and you can target it with Conclave Tribunal. If we look at another example, it becomes much more obvious how this interaction works.
Take mind control. It has two instructions:
Enchant Creature, same as pacifism.
You control enchanted creature.
Here, 'you' refers to the controller of the mind control. It would make very little sense if you controlled the enchantment when your creature was enchanted, since that would cause Mind Control to be almost useless. Instead, the controller of the mind control controls the creature. Similarly, if you were to give control of a mind control you control to another player, such as with Donate, they would also gain control of the creature it targets.
Apologies for using the word 'control' so many times.
3
All correct, but a card can be owned by one player and controlled by another; who controls a card can be changed by cards like Mind Control, the "owner" cannot be changed by any card or effect (at least since ANTE went away). So "your opponent owns it" in the first sentence is correct, but "your opponent both owns and controls it" would make more sense in this context.
– BradC
2 days ago
Thanks for the catch. I originally wrote 'owns' all over the place and realized that that's misleading in the context.
– Aetherfox
2 days ago
add a comment |
As Glorfindel pointed out, although pacifism is enchanted on a creature you control, your opponent controls it, and you can target it with Conclave Tribunal. If we look at another example, it becomes much more obvious how this interaction works.
Take mind control. It has two instructions:
Enchant Creature, same as pacifism.
You control enchanted creature.
Here, 'you' refers to the controller of the mind control. It would make very little sense if you controlled the enchantment when your creature was enchanted, since that would cause Mind Control to be almost useless. Instead, the controller of the mind control controls the creature. Similarly, if you were to give control of a mind control you control to another player, such as with Donate, they would also gain control of the creature it targets.
Apologies for using the word 'control' so many times.
3
All correct, but a card can be owned by one player and controlled by another; who controls a card can be changed by cards like Mind Control, the "owner" cannot be changed by any card or effect (at least since ANTE went away). So "your opponent owns it" in the first sentence is correct, but "your opponent both owns and controls it" would make more sense in this context.
– BradC
2 days ago
Thanks for the catch. I originally wrote 'owns' all over the place and realized that that's misleading in the context.
– Aetherfox
2 days ago
add a comment |
As Glorfindel pointed out, although pacifism is enchanted on a creature you control, your opponent controls it, and you can target it with Conclave Tribunal. If we look at another example, it becomes much more obvious how this interaction works.
Take mind control. It has two instructions:
Enchant Creature, same as pacifism.
You control enchanted creature.
Here, 'you' refers to the controller of the mind control. It would make very little sense if you controlled the enchantment when your creature was enchanted, since that would cause Mind Control to be almost useless. Instead, the controller of the mind control controls the creature. Similarly, if you were to give control of a mind control you control to another player, such as with Donate, they would also gain control of the creature it targets.
Apologies for using the word 'control' so many times.
As Glorfindel pointed out, although pacifism is enchanted on a creature you control, your opponent controls it, and you can target it with Conclave Tribunal. If we look at another example, it becomes much more obvious how this interaction works.
Take mind control. It has two instructions:
Enchant Creature, same as pacifism.
You control enchanted creature.
Here, 'you' refers to the controller of the mind control. It would make very little sense if you controlled the enchantment when your creature was enchanted, since that would cause Mind Control to be almost useless. Instead, the controller of the mind control controls the creature. Similarly, if you were to give control of a mind control you control to another player, such as with Donate, they would also gain control of the creature it targets.
Apologies for using the word 'control' so many times.
edited 2 days ago
answered 2 days ago
AetherfoxAetherfox
1937 bronze badges
1937 bronze badges
3
All correct, but a card can be owned by one player and controlled by another; who controls a card can be changed by cards like Mind Control, the "owner" cannot be changed by any card or effect (at least since ANTE went away). So "your opponent owns it" in the first sentence is correct, but "your opponent both owns and controls it" would make more sense in this context.
– BradC
2 days ago
Thanks for the catch. I originally wrote 'owns' all over the place and realized that that's misleading in the context.
– Aetherfox
2 days ago
add a comment |
3
All correct, but a card can be owned by one player and controlled by another; who controls a card can be changed by cards like Mind Control, the "owner" cannot be changed by any card or effect (at least since ANTE went away). So "your opponent owns it" in the first sentence is correct, but "your opponent both owns and controls it" would make more sense in this context.
– BradC
2 days ago
Thanks for the catch. I originally wrote 'owns' all over the place and realized that that's misleading in the context.
– Aetherfox
2 days ago
3
3
All correct, but a card can be owned by one player and controlled by another; who controls a card can be changed by cards like Mind Control, the "owner" cannot be changed by any card or effect (at least since ANTE went away). So "your opponent owns it" in the first sentence is correct, but "your opponent both owns and controls it" would make more sense in this context.
– BradC
2 days ago
All correct, but a card can be owned by one player and controlled by another; who controls a card can be changed by cards like Mind Control, the "owner" cannot be changed by any card or effect (at least since ANTE went away). So "your opponent owns it" in the first sentence is correct, but "your opponent both owns and controls it" would make more sense in this context.
– BradC
2 days ago
Thanks for the catch. I originally wrote 'owns' all over the place and realized that that's misleading in the context.
– Aetherfox
2 days ago
Thanks for the catch. I originally wrote 'owns' all over the place and realized that that's misleading in the context.
– Aetherfox
2 days ago
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Board & Card Games Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fboardgames.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f48263%2fwho-is-the-controller-of-a-pacifism-enchanting-my-creature%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown