Who is the controller of a Pacifism enchanting my creature?If a permanent turns into a(nother) creature, has...

How could Tony Stark wield the Infinity Nano Gauntlet - at all?

Subgroup generated by a subgroup and a conjugate of it

What would cause a nuclear power plant to break down after 2000 years, but not sooner?

My new Acer Aspire 7 doesn't have a Legacy Boot option, what can I do to get it?

Compute the square root of a positive integer using binary search

Why was ramjet fuel used as hydraulic fluid during Saturn V checkout?

What was the intention with the Commodore 128?

If it isn't [someone's name]!

What's a good pattern to calculate a variable only when it is used the first time?

Rotate List by K places

Gofer work in exchange for Letter of Recommendation

What are some tips and tricks for finding the cheapest flight when luggage and other fees are not revealed until far into the booking process?

Unconventional examples of mathematical modelling

What is the opposite of "hunger level"?

A Magic Diamond

Polar contour plot in Mathematica?

Meaning and structure of headline "Hair it is: A List of ..."

What exactly happened to the 18 crew members who were reported as "missing" in "Q Who"?

Heyawacky: Ace of Cups

Can anybody tell me who this Pokemon is?

What is the best way to use errors in mathematica M12?

Best model for precedence constraints within scheduling problem

Unsolved Problems due to Lack of Computational Power

Output with the same length always



Who is the controller of a Pacifism enchanting my creature?


If a permanent turns into a(nother) creature, has it entered the battlefield?Ordeal of Heliod and changing creature controlLeyline of the Void and exiling stolen permanentsWho is “You” when the creature controller is not the owner?How do Aether Rift and Library of Leng interact?Can you sacrifice Animate Dead AND the creature it enchants?Rescue from the Underworld on an unearthed creatureWhat happens to auras that come back from exile?What happens when a reanimated creature returns from exile?Under which controller does a stolen permanent come into play after being exiled?






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}







7















My opponent played Pacifism on a creature on my side of the battlefield. Later, I wanted to exile the enchantment with Conclave Tribunal.



My opponent had the opinion that I was now the controller of Pacifism, so I couldn't exile this enchantment with Conclave Tribunal.



I assumed that I could because I thought he was the controller of Pacifism. Who is right here?










share|improve this question

































    7















    My opponent played Pacifism on a creature on my side of the battlefield. Later, I wanted to exile the enchantment with Conclave Tribunal.



    My opponent had the opinion that I was now the controller of Pacifism, so I couldn't exile this enchantment with Conclave Tribunal.



    I assumed that I could because I thought he was the controller of Pacifism. Who is right here?










    share|improve this question





























      7












      7








      7








      My opponent played Pacifism on a creature on my side of the battlefield. Later, I wanted to exile the enchantment with Conclave Tribunal.



      My opponent had the opinion that I was now the controller of Pacifism, so I couldn't exile this enchantment with Conclave Tribunal.



      I assumed that I could because I thought he was the controller of Pacifism. Who is right here?










      share|improve this question
















      My opponent played Pacifism on a creature on my side of the battlefield. Later, I wanted to exile the enchantment with Conclave Tribunal.



      My opponent had the opinion that I was now the controller of Pacifism, so I couldn't exile this enchantment with Conclave Tribunal.



      I assumed that I could because I thought he was the controller of Pacifism. Who is right here?







      magic-the-gathering






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited 2 days ago









      Glorfindel

      13.8k1 gold badge44 silver badges77 bronze badges




      13.8k1 gold badge44 silver badges77 bronze badges










      asked 2 days ago









      kristiankristian

      2651 silver badge6 bronze badges




      2651 silver badge6 bronze badges

























          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          10














          The controller of an aura is the player who cast it, not (necessarily) the controller of the permanent it enchants. A subsequent control changing effect, like Donate, can change this, but they're relatively rare.



          So you're right, you can target Pacifism with Conclave Tribunal and exile it.






          share|improve this answer

































            1














            As Glorfindel pointed out, although pacifism is enchanted on a creature you control, your opponent controls it, and you can target it with Conclave Tribunal. If we look at another example, it becomes much more obvious how this interaction works.



            Take mind control. It has two instructions:




            1. Enchant Creature, same as pacifism.


            2. You control enchanted creature.



            Here, 'you' refers to the controller of the mind control. It would make very little sense if you controlled the enchantment when your creature was enchanted, since that would cause Mind Control to be almost useless. Instead, the controller of the mind control controls the creature. Similarly, if you were to give control of a mind control you control to another player, such as with Donate, they would also gain control of the creature it targets.



            Apologies for using the word 'control' so many times.






            share|improve this answer























            • 3





              All correct, but a card can be owned by one player and controlled by another; who controls a card can be changed by cards like Mind Control, the "owner" cannot be changed by any card or effect (at least since ANTE went away). So "your opponent owns it" in the first sentence is correct, but "your opponent both owns and controls it" would make more sense in this context.

              – BradC
              2 days ago











            • Thanks for the catch. I originally wrote 'owns' all over the place and realized that that's misleading in the context.

              – Aetherfox
              2 days ago














            Your Answer








            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "147"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: false,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: null,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fboardgames.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f48263%2fwho-is-the-controller-of-a-pacifism-enchanting-my-creature%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes








            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            10














            The controller of an aura is the player who cast it, not (necessarily) the controller of the permanent it enchants. A subsequent control changing effect, like Donate, can change this, but they're relatively rare.



            So you're right, you can target Pacifism with Conclave Tribunal and exile it.






            share|improve this answer






























              10














              The controller of an aura is the player who cast it, not (necessarily) the controller of the permanent it enchants. A subsequent control changing effect, like Donate, can change this, but they're relatively rare.



              So you're right, you can target Pacifism with Conclave Tribunal and exile it.






              share|improve this answer




























                10












                10








                10







                The controller of an aura is the player who cast it, not (necessarily) the controller of the permanent it enchants. A subsequent control changing effect, like Donate, can change this, but they're relatively rare.



                So you're right, you can target Pacifism with Conclave Tribunal and exile it.






                share|improve this answer













                The controller of an aura is the player who cast it, not (necessarily) the controller of the permanent it enchants. A subsequent control changing effect, like Donate, can change this, but they're relatively rare.



                So you're right, you can target Pacifism with Conclave Tribunal and exile it.







                share|improve this answer












                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer










                answered 2 days ago









                GlorfindelGlorfindel

                13.8k1 gold badge44 silver badges77 bronze badges




                13.8k1 gold badge44 silver badges77 bronze badges




























                    1














                    As Glorfindel pointed out, although pacifism is enchanted on a creature you control, your opponent controls it, and you can target it with Conclave Tribunal. If we look at another example, it becomes much more obvious how this interaction works.



                    Take mind control. It has two instructions:




                    1. Enchant Creature, same as pacifism.


                    2. You control enchanted creature.



                    Here, 'you' refers to the controller of the mind control. It would make very little sense if you controlled the enchantment when your creature was enchanted, since that would cause Mind Control to be almost useless. Instead, the controller of the mind control controls the creature. Similarly, if you were to give control of a mind control you control to another player, such as with Donate, they would also gain control of the creature it targets.



                    Apologies for using the word 'control' so many times.






                    share|improve this answer























                    • 3





                      All correct, but a card can be owned by one player and controlled by another; who controls a card can be changed by cards like Mind Control, the "owner" cannot be changed by any card or effect (at least since ANTE went away). So "your opponent owns it" in the first sentence is correct, but "your opponent both owns and controls it" would make more sense in this context.

                      – BradC
                      2 days ago











                    • Thanks for the catch. I originally wrote 'owns' all over the place and realized that that's misleading in the context.

                      – Aetherfox
                      2 days ago
















                    1














                    As Glorfindel pointed out, although pacifism is enchanted on a creature you control, your opponent controls it, and you can target it with Conclave Tribunal. If we look at another example, it becomes much more obvious how this interaction works.



                    Take mind control. It has two instructions:




                    1. Enchant Creature, same as pacifism.


                    2. You control enchanted creature.



                    Here, 'you' refers to the controller of the mind control. It would make very little sense if you controlled the enchantment when your creature was enchanted, since that would cause Mind Control to be almost useless. Instead, the controller of the mind control controls the creature. Similarly, if you were to give control of a mind control you control to another player, such as with Donate, they would also gain control of the creature it targets.



                    Apologies for using the word 'control' so many times.






                    share|improve this answer























                    • 3





                      All correct, but a card can be owned by one player and controlled by another; who controls a card can be changed by cards like Mind Control, the "owner" cannot be changed by any card or effect (at least since ANTE went away). So "your opponent owns it" in the first sentence is correct, but "your opponent both owns and controls it" would make more sense in this context.

                      – BradC
                      2 days ago











                    • Thanks for the catch. I originally wrote 'owns' all over the place and realized that that's misleading in the context.

                      – Aetherfox
                      2 days ago














                    1












                    1








                    1







                    As Glorfindel pointed out, although pacifism is enchanted on a creature you control, your opponent controls it, and you can target it with Conclave Tribunal. If we look at another example, it becomes much more obvious how this interaction works.



                    Take mind control. It has two instructions:




                    1. Enchant Creature, same as pacifism.


                    2. You control enchanted creature.



                    Here, 'you' refers to the controller of the mind control. It would make very little sense if you controlled the enchantment when your creature was enchanted, since that would cause Mind Control to be almost useless. Instead, the controller of the mind control controls the creature. Similarly, if you were to give control of a mind control you control to another player, such as with Donate, they would also gain control of the creature it targets.



                    Apologies for using the word 'control' so many times.






                    share|improve this answer















                    As Glorfindel pointed out, although pacifism is enchanted on a creature you control, your opponent controls it, and you can target it with Conclave Tribunal. If we look at another example, it becomes much more obvious how this interaction works.



                    Take mind control. It has two instructions:




                    1. Enchant Creature, same as pacifism.


                    2. You control enchanted creature.



                    Here, 'you' refers to the controller of the mind control. It would make very little sense if you controlled the enchantment when your creature was enchanted, since that would cause Mind Control to be almost useless. Instead, the controller of the mind control controls the creature. Similarly, if you were to give control of a mind control you control to another player, such as with Donate, they would also gain control of the creature it targets.



                    Apologies for using the word 'control' so many times.







                    share|improve this answer














                    share|improve this answer



                    share|improve this answer








                    edited 2 days ago

























                    answered 2 days ago









                    AetherfoxAetherfox

                    1937 bronze badges




                    1937 bronze badges











                    • 3





                      All correct, but a card can be owned by one player and controlled by another; who controls a card can be changed by cards like Mind Control, the "owner" cannot be changed by any card or effect (at least since ANTE went away). So "your opponent owns it" in the first sentence is correct, but "your opponent both owns and controls it" would make more sense in this context.

                      – BradC
                      2 days ago











                    • Thanks for the catch. I originally wrote 'owns' all over the place and realized that that's misleading in the context.

                      – Aetherfox
                      2 days ago














                    • 3





                      All correct, but a card can be owned by one player and controlled by another; who controls a card can be changed by cards like Mind Control, the "owner" cannot be changed by any card or effect (at least since ANTE went away). So "your opponent owns it" in the first sentence is correct, but "your opponent both owns and controls it" would make more sense in this context.

                      – BradC
                      2 days ago











                    • Thanks for the catch. I originally wrote 'owns' all over the place and realized that that's misleading in the context.

                      – Aetherfox
                      2 days ago








                    3




                    3





                    All correct, but a card can be owned by one player and controlled by another; who controls a card can be changed by cards like Mind Control, the "owner" cannot be changed by any card or effect (at least since ANTE went away). So "your opponent owns it" in the first sentence is correct, but "your opponent both owns and controls it" would make more sense in this context.

                    – BradC
                    2 days ago





                    All correct, but a card can be owned by one player and controlled by another; who controls a card can be changed by cards like Mind Control, the "owner" cannot be changed by any card or effect (at least since ANTE went away). So "your opponent owns it" in the first sentence is correct, but "your opponent both owns and controls it" would make more sense in this context.

                    – BradC
                    2 days ago













                    Thanks for the catch. I originally wrote 'owns' all over the place and realized that that's misleading in the context.

                    – Aetherfox
                    2 days ago





                    Thanks for the catch. I originally wrote 'owns' all over the place and realized that that's misleading in the context.

                    – Aetherfox
                    2 days ago


















                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Board & Card Games Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fboardgames.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f48263%2fwho-is-the-controller-of-a-pacifism-enchanting-my-creature%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Taj Mahal Inhaltsverzeichnis Aufbau | Geschichte | 350-Jahr-Feier | Heutige Bedeutung | Siehe auch |...

                    Baia Sprie Cuprins Etimologie | Istorie | Demografie | Politică și administrație | Arii naturale...

                    Nicolae Petrescu-Găină Cuprins Biografie | Opera | In memoriam | Varia | Controverse, incertitudini...