Is Thieves' Cant a language?Are there any other rule mechanics that could grant Thieves' Cant?Can Thieves'...
Did Michelle Obama have a staff of 23; and Melania have a staff of 4?
Does knowing that the exponent is in a certain range help solving discrete log?
Can I use images from my published papers in my thesis without copyright infringment?
Why should P.I be willing to write strong LOR even if that means losing a undergraduate from his/her lab?
The Lucky House
What modifiers are added to the attack and damage rolls of this unique longbow from Waterdeep: Dragon Heist?
When and which board game was the first to be ever invented?
Expressing a chain of boolean ORs using ILP
What was the intention with the Commodore 128?
Have made several mistakes during the course of my PhD. Can't help but feel resentment. Can I get some advice about how to move forward?
How to use the passive form to say "This flower was watered."
A reccomended structured approach to self studying music theory for songwriting
May the tower use the runway while an emergency aircraft is inbound?
Would getting a natural 20 with a penalty still count as a critical hit?
The Tripan Balance
Designing a prison for a telekinetic race
Pocket Clarketech
global variant of csname…endcsname
Are unaudited server logs admissible in a court of law?
What should I do with the stock I own if I anticipate there will be a recession?
What happened after the end of the Truman Show?
What exactly happened to the 18 crew members who were reported as "missing" in "Q Who"?
How does the illumination of the sky from the sun compare to that of the moon?
Why do so many people play out of turn on the last lead?
Is Thieves' Cant a language?
Are there any other rule mechanics that could grant Thieves' Cant?Can Thieves' Cant be used across languages?Can Thieves' Cant be understood without a level in Rogue?Why doesn't the Criminal background give Thieves' Cant?Would other PCs eventually notice two rogues talking in Thieves' Cant?Except for PC Rogues, who else knows thieves’ cant?Does Comprehend Languages allow one to understand Thieves' Cant?Every language character optimizationCan you choose a dialect of a language instead of the whole language?Can Thieves' Cant be used across languages?What justification could there be for a PC learning thieves' cant when multiclassing Rogue?Are there any other rule mechanics that could grant Thieves' Cant?
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}
$begingroup$
In a recent question there was some confusion as to whether or not Thieves' Cant is a language, a class feature, or both.
Which is it?
dnd-5e class-feature languages
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
In a recent question there was some confusion as to whether or not Thieves' Cant is a language, a class feature, or both.
Which is it?
dnd-5e class-feature languages
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
@PJRZ just because a question might have a similar answer (or part of an answer) to another question, doesn't make it a duplicate question. Asking what is the maximum damage of a Great Axe is not the same as asking which is better, a Great Axe vs a Great Sword, but both questions will have an answer with a similar calculation
$endgroup$
– illustro
2 days ago
$begingroup$
Let us continue this discussion in chat.
$endgroup$
– illustro
2 days ago
$begingroup$
related rpg.stackexchange.com/questions/132288
$endgroup$
– enkryptor
yesterday
add a comment |
$begingroup$
In a recent question there was some confusion as to whether or not Thieves' Cant is a language, a class feature, or both.
Which is it?
dnd-5e class-feature languages
$endgroup$
In a recent question there was some confusion as to whether or not Thieves' Cant is a language, a class feature, or both.
Which is it?
dnd-5e class-feature languages
dnd-5e class-feature languages
asked 2 days ago
illustroillustro
12.8k2 gold badges42 silver badges93 bronze badges
12.8k2 gold badges42 silver badges93 bronze badges
1
$begingroup$
@PJRZ just because a question might have a similar answer (or part of an answer) to another question, doesn't make it a duplicate question. Asking what is the maximum damage of a Great Axe is not the same as asking which is better, a Great Axe vs a Great Sword, but both questions will have an answer with a similar calculation
$endgroup$
– illustro
2 days ago
$begingroup$
Let us continue this discussion in chat.
$endgroup$
– illustro
2 days ago
$begingroup$
related rpg.stackexchange.com/questions/132288
$endgroup$
– enkryptor
yesterday
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
@PJRZ just because a question might have a similar answer (or part of an answer) to another question, doesn't make it a duplicate question. Asking what is the maximum damage of a Great Axe is not the same as asking which is better, a Great Axe vs a Great Sword, but both questions will have an answer with a similar calculation
$endgroup$
– illustro
2 days ago
$begingroup$
Let us continue this discussion in chat.
$endgroup$
– illustro
2 days ago
$begingroup$
related rpg.stackexchange.com/questions/132288
$endgroup$
– enkryptor
yesterday
1
1
$begingroup$
@PJRZ just because a question might have a similar answer (or part of an answer) to another question, doesn't make it a duplicate question. Asking what is the maximum damage of a Great Axe is not the same as asking which is better, a Great Axe vs a Great Sword, but both questions will have an answer with a similar calculation
$endgroup$
– illustro
2 days ago
$begingroup$
@PJRZ just because a question might have a similar answer (or part of an answer) to another question, doesn't make it a duplicate question. Asking what is the maximum damage of a Great Axe is not the same as asking which is better, a Great Axe vs a Great Sword, but both questions will have an answer with a similar calculation
$endgroup$
– illustro
2 days ago
$begingroup$
Let us continue this discussion in chat.
$endgroup$
– illustro
2 days ago
$begingroup$
Let us continue this discussion in chat.
$endgroup$
– illustro
2 days ago
$begingroup$
related rpg.stackexchange.com/questions/132288
$endgroup$
– enkryptor
yesterday
$begingroup$
related rpg.stackexchange.com/questions/132288
$endgroup$
– enkryptor
yesterday
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Thieves' cant is not a language but it's treated as one mechanically
It's a class feature (though I'm not sure anyone's debating this) because it's detailed in the list of a Rogue's class features. Beyond that...
I think you've hit one of those places where the game rules have attempted to fit a round peg into a square hole. Mechanically the way the rules treat thieves' cant (as a language) appears to jar slightly with the way you'd most likely rationalise it being used narratively.
It's referred to explicitly as a langauge in a couple of places:
With your DM’s permission, you can instead choose a language from the Exotic Languages table or a secret language, such as thieves’ cant or the tongue of druids. Basic rules
You might invent additional secret languages, besides Druidic and thieves’ cant, that allow members of certain organizations or political affiliations to communicate. DMG
It's worth noting that both of these quotes refer to it as a 'secret language and that it is not listed in either the standard or the exotic language lists. This is support for it sitting slightly uncertainly alongside other normal languages.
It's a written language:
You understand a set of secret signs and symbols used to convey short, simple messages, such as whether an area is dangerous or the territory of a thieves’ guild, whether loot is nearby, or whether the people in an area are easy marks or will provide a safe house for thieves on the run. Basic rules
So, these symbols are portrayed as an international code known to thieves - not in any way localised.
But it's not a spoken language:
During your rogue training you learned thieves’ cant, a secret mix of dialect, jargon, and code that allows you to hide messages in seemingly normal conversation. Only another creature that knows thieves’ cant understands such messages. Basic rules
The fact that thieves' cant allows you to hide these messages 'in a seemingly normal conversation' means that it isn't itself an alternative spoken language.
Proficiency in thieves' cant allows a thief to have an apparently innocuous conversation in Common (or any other spoken language) while employing a series of techniques in order to communicate a specific message, entirely unbeknownst to unenlightened listeners. If they were speaking either another language entirely, a variant of Pig Latin, or even something like cockney rhyming slang, then it would not appear to be 'a seemingly normal conversation' to a casual observer - even if they'd be none the wiser to the words actual significance.
So is thieves' cant a language?
Well, yes and no.
Yes - mechanically the game treats it as one, referring to it within lists of languages on a couple of occasions - you can even take it as a language option if your DM allows. It also has elements of a basic written language, as it's able to convey 'short simple messages' through signs and symbols. And understanding of these symbols is not apparently in any way localised - unlike a real world cant or argot.
However, No, it's not a language in the plainest sense. It cannot be spoken on its own but relies on the thief speaking another language while applying a series of verbal techniques in order to disguise their true meaning. Thieves' cant can apparently be applied to a conversation in Gnomish or Abyssal just as easily as one in Common and it therefore must be considered more of an array of obfuscating oratory techniques than any kind of linguistic dialect.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Hmm... might it be worth comparing to stereotypical spy speech?
$endgroup$
– Justin Time
2 days ago
2
$begingroup$
uh, convestation is speech. so it is also a spoken steganography,
$endgroup$
– Jasen
yesterday
$begingroup$
Unlike normal stenography techniques, though, knowing another language is not required to understand Cant. If a thief only speaks common and his partner only speaks Abyssal there's nothing that would seem to prevent their communication via Cant , similar to if it were an additional spoken language, despite the fact that outsiders apparently think the pair are having a normal bilingual conversation or something.
$endgroup$
– the dark wanderer
3 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
It's a class feature and not a language
Thieves’ Cant
During your rogue training you learned thieves’ cant, a secret mix of dialect, jargon, and code that allows you to hide messages in seemingly normal conversation. Only another creature that knows thieves’ cant understands such messages. It takes four times longer to convey such a message than it does to speak the same idea plainly.
In addition, you understand a set of secret signs and symbols used to convey short, simple messages, such as whether an area is dangerous or the territory of a thieves’ guild, whether loot is nearby, or whether the people in an area are easy marks or will provide a safe house for thieves on the run.
Linguistically, Thieves' Cant is a cant (unsurprisingly) or argot. Its use in D&D is based on the real-life thieves' cant used in Britain originating in the 14th century and popularised in Elizabethan literature.
$endgroup$
3
$begingroup$
The "secret signs and symbols" also have parallels with hobo signs.
$endgroup$
– Michael Seifert
2 days ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "122"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f153571%2fis-thieves-cant-a-language%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Thieves' cant is not a language but it's treated as one mechanically
It's a class feature (though I'm not sure anyone's debating this) because it's detailed in the list of a Rogue's class features. Beyond that...
I think you've hit one of those places where the game rules have attempted to fit a round peg into a square hole. Mechanically the way the rules treat thieves' cant (as a language) appears to jar slightly with the way you'd most likely rationalise it being used narratively.
It's referred to explicitly as a langauge in a couple of places:
With your DM’s permission, you can instead choose a language from the Exotic Languages table or a secret language, such as thieves’ cant or the tongue of druids. Basic rules
You might invent additional secret languages, besides Druidic and thieves’ cant, that allow members of certain organizations or political affiliations to communicate. DMG
It's worth noting that both of these quotes refer to it as a 'secret language and that it is not listed in either the standard or the exotic language lists. This is support for it sitting slightly uncertainly alongside other normal languages.
It's a written language:
You understand a set of secret signs and symbols used to convey short, simple messages, such as whether an area is dangerous or the territory of a thieves’ guild, whether loot is nearby, or whether the people in an area are easy marks or will provide a safe house for thieves on the run. Basic rules
So, these symbols are portrayed as an international code known to thieves - not in any way localised.
But it's not a spoken language:
During your rogue training you learned thieves’ cant, a secret mix of dialect, jargon, and code that allows you to hide messages in seemingly normal conversation. Only another creature that knows thieves’ cant understands such messages. Basic rules
The fact that thieves' cant allows you to hide these messages 'in a seemingly normal conversation' means that it isn't itself an alternative spoken language.
Proficiency in thieves' cant allows a thief to have an apparently innocuous conversation in Common (or any other spoken language) while employing a series of techniques in order to communicate a specific message, entirely unbeknownst to unenlightened listeners. If they were speaking either another language entirely, a variant of Pig Latin, or even something like cockney rhyming slang, then it would not appear to be 'a seemingly normal conversation' to a casual observer - even if they'd be none the wiser to the words actual significance.
So is thieves' cant a language?
Well, yes and no.
Yes - mechanically the game treats it as one, referring to it within lists of languages on a couple of occasions - you can even take it as a language option if your DM allows. It also has elements of a basic written language, as it's able to convey 'short simple messages' through signs and symbols. And understanding of these symbols is not apparently in any way localised - unlike a real world cant or argot.
However, No, it's not a language in the plainest sense. It cannot be spoken on its own but relies on the thief speaking another language while applying a series of verbal techniques in order to disguise their true meaning. Thieves' cant can apparently be applied to a conversation in Gnomish or Abyssal just as easily as one in Common and it therefore must be considered more of an array of obfuscating oratory techniques than any kind of linguistic dialect.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Hmm... might it be worth comparing to stereotypical spy speech?
$endgroup$
– Justin Time
2 days ago
2
$begingroup$
uh, convestation is speech. so it is also a spoken steganography,
$endgroup$
– Jasen
yesterday
$begingroup$
Unlike normal stenography techniques, though, knowing another language is not required to understand Cant. If a thief only speaks common and his partner only speaks Abyssal there's nothing that would seem to prevent their communication via Cant , similar to if it were an additional spoken language, despite the fact that outsiders apparently think the pair are having a normal bilingual conversation or something.
$endgroup$
– the dark wanderer
3 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Thieves' cant is not a language but it's treated as one mechanically
It's a class feature (though I'm not sure anyone's debating this) because it's detailed in the list of a Rogue's class features. Beyond that...
I think you've hit one of those places where the game rules have attempted to fit a round peg into a square hole. Mechanically the way the rules treat thieves' cant (as a language) appears to jar slightly with the way you'd most likely rationalise it being used narratively.
It's referred to explicitly as a langauge in a couple of places:
With your DM’s permission, you can instead choose a language from the Exotic Languages table or a secret language, such as thieves’ cant or the tongue of druids. Basic rules
You might invent additional secret languages, besides Druidic and thieves’ cant, that allow members of certain organizations or political affiliations to communicate. DMG
It's worth noting that both of these quotes refer to it as a 'secret language and that it is not listed in either the standard or the exotic language lists. This is support for it sitting slightly uncertainly alongside other normal languages.
It's a written language:
You understand a set of secret signs and symbols used to convey short, simple messages, such as whether an area is dangerous or the territory of a thieves’ guild, whether loot is nearby, or whether the people in an area are easy marks or will provide a safe house for thieves on the run. Basic rules
So, these symbols are portrayed as an international code known to thieves - not in any way localised.
But it's not a spoken language:
During your rogue training you learned thieves’ cant, a secret mix of dialect, jargon, and code that allows you to hide messages in seemingly normal conversation. Only another creature that knows thieves’ cant understands such messages. Basic rules
The fact that thieves' cant allows you to hide these messages 'in a seemingly normal conversation' means that it isn't itself an alternative spoken language.
Proficiency in thieves' cant allows a thief to have an apparently innocuous conversation in Common (or any other spoken language) while employing a series of techniques in order to communicate a specific message, entirely unbeknownst to unenlightened listeners. If they were speaking either another language entirely, a variant of Pig Latin, or even something like cockney rhyming slang, then it would not appear to be 'a seemingly normal conversation' to a casual observer - even if they'd be none the wiser to the words actual significance.
So is thieves' cant a language?
Well, yes and no.
Yes - mechanically the game treats it as one, referring to it within lists of languages on a couple of occasions - you can even take it as a language option if your DM allows. It also has elements of a basic written language, as it's able to convey 'short simple messages' through signs and symbols. And understanding of these symbols is not apparently in any way localised - unlike a real world cant or argot.
However, No, it's not a language in the plainest sense. It cannot be spoken on its own but relies on the thief speaking another language while applying a series of verbal techniques in order to disguise their true meaning. Thieves' cant can apparently be applied to a conversation in Gnomish or Abyssal just as easily as one in Common and it therefore must be considered more of an array of obfuscating oratory techniques than any kind of linguistic dialect.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Hmm... might it be worth comparing to stereotypical spy speech?
$endgroup$
– Justin Time
2 days ago
2
$begingroup$
uh, convestation is speech. so it is also a spoken steganography,
$endgroup$
– Jasen
yesterday
$begingroup$
Unlike normal stenography techniques, though, knowing another language is not required to understand Cant. If a thief only speaks common and his partner only speaks Abyssal there's nothing that would seem to prevent their communication via Cant , similar to if it were an additional spoken language, despite the fact that outsiders apparently think the pair are having a normal bilingual conversation or something.
$endgroup$
– the dark wanderer
3 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Thieves' cant is not a language but it's treated as one mechanically
It's a class feature (though I'm not sure anyone's debating this) because it's detailed in the list of a Rogue's class features. Beyond that...
I think you've hit one of those places where the game rules have attempted to fit a round peg into a square hole. Mechanically the way the rules treat thieves' cant (as a language) appears to jar slightly with the way you'd most likely rationalise it being used narratively.
It's referred to explicitly as a langauge in a couple of places:
With your DM’s permission, you can instead choose a language from the Exotic Languages table or a secret language, such as thieves’ cant or the tongue of druids. Basic rules
You might invent additional secret languages, besides Druidic and thieves’ cant, that allow members of certain organizations or political affiliations to communicate. DMG
It's worth noting that both of these quotes refer to it as a 'secret language and that it is not listed in either the standard or the exotic language lists. This is support for it sitting slightly uncertainly alongside other normal languages.
It's a written language:
You understand a set of secret signs and symbols used to convey short, simple messages, such as whether an area is dangerous or the territory of a thieves’ guild, whether loot is nearby, or whether the people in an area are easy marks or will provide a safe house for thieves on the run. Basic rules
So, these symbols are portrayed as an international code known to thieves - not in any way localised.
But it's not a spoken language:
During your rogue training you learned thieves’ cant, a secret mix of dialect, jargon, and code that allows you to hide messages in seemingly normal conversation. Only another creature that knows thieves’ cant understands such messages. Basic rules
The fact that thieves' cant allows you to hide these messages 'in a seemingly normal conversation' means that it isn't itself an alternative spoken language.
Proficiency in thieves' cant allows a thief to have an apparently innocuous conversation in Common (or any other spoken language) while employing a series of techniques in order to communicate a specific message, entirely unbeknownst to unenlightened listeners. If they were speaking either another language entirely, a variant of Pig Latin, or even something like cockney rhyming slang, then it would not appear to be 'a seemingly normal conversation' to a casual observer - even if they'd be none the wiser to the words actual significance.
So is thieves' cant a language?
Well, yes and no.
Yes - mechanically the game treats it as one, referring to it within lists of languages on a couple of occasions - you can even take it as a language option if your DM allows. It also has elements of a basic written language, as it's able to convey 'short simple messages' through signs and symbols. And understanding of these symbols is not apparently in any way localised - unlike a real world cant or argot.
However, No, it's not a language in the plainest sense. It cannot be spoken on its own but relies on the thief speaking another language while applying a series of verbal techniques in order to disguise their true meaning. Thieves' cant can apparently be applied to a conversation in Gnomish or Abyssal just as easily as one in Common and it therefore must be considered more of an array of obfuscating oratory techniques than any kind of linguistic dialect.
$endgroup$
Thieves' cant is not a language but it's treated as one mechanically
It's a class feature (though I'm not sure anyone's debating this) because it's detailed in the list of a Rogue's class features. Beyond that...
I think you've hit one of those places where the game rules have attempted to fit a round peg into a square hole. Mechanically the way the rules treat thieves' cant (as a language) appears to jar slightly with the way you'd most likely rationalise it being used narratively.
It's referred to explicitly as a langauge in a couple of places:
With your DM’s permission, you can instead choose a language from the Exotic Languages table or a secret language, such as thieves’ cant or the tongue of druids. Basic rules
You might invent additional secret languages, besides Druidic and thieves’ cant, that allow members of certain organizations or political affiliations to communicate. DMG
It's worth noting that both of these quotes refer to it as a 'secret language and that it is not listed in either the standard or the exotic language lists. This is support for it sitting slightly uncertainly alongside other normal languages.
It's a written language:
You understand a set of secret signs and symbols used to convey short, simple messages, such as whether an area is dangerous or the territory of a thieves’ guild, whether loot is nearby, or whether the people in an area are easy marks or will provide a safe house for thieves on the run. Basic rules
So, these symbols are portrayed as an international code known to thieves - not in any way localised.
But it's not a spoken language:
During your rogue training you learned thieves’ cant, a secret mix of dialect, jargon, and code that allows you to hide messages in seemingly normal conversation. Only another creature that knows thieves’ cant understands such messages. Basic rules
The fact that thieves' cant allows you to hide these messages 'in a seemingly normal conversation' means that it isn't itself an alternative spoken language.
Proficiency in thieves' cant allows a thief to have an apparently innocuous conversation in Common (or any other spoken language) while employing a series of techniques in order to communicate a specific message, entirely unbeknownst to unenlightened listeners. If they were speaking either another language entirely, a variant of Pig Latin, or even something like cockney rhyming slang, then it would not appear to be 'a seemingly normal conversation' to a casual observer - even if they'd be none the wiser to the words actual significance.
So is thieves' cant a language?
Well, yes and no.
Yes - mechanically the game treats it as one, referring to it within lists of languages on a couple of occasions - you can even take it as a language option if your DM allows. It also has elements of a basic written language, as it's able to convey 'short simple messages' through signs and symbols. And understanding of these symbols is not apparently in any way localised - unlike a real world cant or argot.
However, No, it's not a language in the plainest sense. It cannot be spoken on its own but relies on the thief speaking another language while applying a series of verbal techniques in order to disguise their true meaning. Thieves' cant can apparently be applied to a conversation in Gnomish or Abyssal just as easily as one in Common and it therefore must be considered more of an array of obfuscating oratory techniques than any kind of linguistic dialect.
edited yesterday
V2Blast♦
33.6k5 gold badges123 silver badges210 bronze badges
33.6k5 gold badges123 silver badges210 bronze badges
answered 2 days ago
TiggerousTiggerous
15.2k4 gold badges68 silver badges120 bronze badges
15.2k4 gold badges68 silver badges120 bronze badges
$begingroup$
Hmm... might it be worth comparing to stereotypical spy speech?
$endgroup$
– Justin Time
2 days ago
2
$begingroup$
uh, convestation is speech. so it is also a spoken steganography,
$endgroup$
– Jasen
yesterday
$begingroup$
Unlike normal stenography techniques, though, knowing another language is not required to understand Cant. If a thief only speaks common and his partner only speaks Abyssal there's nothing that would seem to prevent their communication via Cant , similar to if it were an additional spoken language, despite the fact that outsiders apparently think the pair are having a normal bilingual conversation or something.
$endgroup$
– the dark wanderer
3 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Hmm... might it be worth comparing to stereotypical spy speech?
$endgroup$
– Justin Time
2 days ago
2
$begingroup$
uh, convestation is speech. so it is also a spoken steganography,
$endgroup$
– Jasen
yesterday
$begingroup$
Unlike normal stenography techniques, though, knowing another language is not required to understand Cant. If a thief only speaks common and his partner only speaks Abyssal there's nothing that would seem to prevent their communication via Cant , similar to if it were an additional spoken language, despite the fact that outsiders apparently think the pair are having a normal bilingual conversation or something.
$endgroup$
– the dark wanderer
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
Hmm... might it be worth comparing to stereotypical spy speech?
$endgroup$
– Justin Time
2 days ago
$begingroup$
Hmm... might it be worth comparing to stereotypical spy speech?
$endgroup$
– Justin Time
2 days ago
2
2
$begingroup$
uh, convestation is speech. so it is also a spoken steganography,
$endgroup$
– Jasen
yesterday
$begingroup$
uh, convestation is speech. so it is also a spoken steganography,
$endgroup$
– Jasen
yesterday
$begingroup$
Unlike normal stenography techniques, though, knowing another language is not required to understand Cant. If a thief only speaks common and his partner only speaks Abyssal there's nothing that would seem to prevent their communication via Cant , similar to if it were an additional spoken language, despite the fact that outsiders apparently think the pair are having a normal bilingual conversation or something.
$endgroup$
– the dark wanderer
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
Unlike normal stenography techniques, though, knowing another language is not required to understand Cant. If a thief only speaks common and his partner only speaks Abyssal there's nothing that would seem to prevent their communication via Cant , similar to if it were an additional spoken language, despite the fact that outsiders apparently think the pair are having a normal bilingual conversation or something.
$endgroup$
– the dark wanderer
3 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
It's a class feature and not a language
Thieves’ Cant
During your rogue training you learned thieves’ cant, a secret mix of dialect, jargon, and code that allows you to hide messages in seemingly normal conversation. Only another creature that knows thieves’ cant understands such messages. It takes four times longer to convey such a message than it does to speak the same idea plainly.
In addition, you understand a set of secret signs and symbols used to convey short, simple messages, such as whether an area is dangerous or the territory of a thieves’ guild, whether loot is nearby, or whether the people in an area are easy marks or will provide a safe house for thieves on the run.
Linguistically, Thieves' Cant is a cant (unsurprisingly) or argot. Its use in D&D is based on the real-life thieves' cant used in Britain originating in the 14th century and popularised in Elizabethan literature.
$endgroup$
3
$begingroup$
The "secret signs and symbols" also have parallels with hobo signs.
$endgroup$
– Michael Seifert
2 days ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
It's a class feature and not a language
Thieves’ Cant
During your rogue training you learned thieves’ cant, a secret mix of dialect, jargon, and code that allows you to hide messages in seemingly normal conversation. Only another creature that knows thieves’ cant understands such messages. It takes four times longer to convey such a message than it does to speak the same idea plainly.
In addition, you understand a set of secret signs and symbols used to convey short, simple messages, such as whether an area is dangerous or the territory of a thieves’ guild, whether loot is nearby, or whether the people in an area are easy marks or will provide a safe house for thieves on the run.
Linguistically, Thieves' Cant is a cant (unsurprisingly) or argot. Its use in D&D is based on the real-life thieves' cant used in Britain originating in the 14th century and popularised in Elizabethan literature.
$endgroup$
3
$begingroup$
The "secret signs and symbols" also have parallels with hobo signs.
$endgroup$
– Michael Seifert
2 days ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
It's a class feature and not a language
Thieves’ Cant
During your rogue training you learned thieves’ cant, a secret mix of dialect, jargon, and code that allows you to hide messages in seemingly normal conversation. Only another creature that knows thieves’ cant understands such messages. It takes four times longer to convey such a message than it does to speak the same idea plainly.
In addition, you understand a set of secret signs and symbols used to convey short, simple messages, such as whether an area is dangerous or the territory of a thieves’ guild, whether loot is nearby, or whether the people in an area are easy marks or will provide a safe house for thieves on the run.
Linguistically, Thieves' Cant is a cant (unsurprisingly) or argot. Its use in D&D is based on the real-life thieves' cant used in Britain originating in the 14th century and popularised in Elizabethan literature.
$endgroup$
It's a class feature and not a language
Thieves’ Cant
During your rogue training you learned thieves’ cant, a secret mix of dialect, jargon, and code that allows you to hide messages in seemingly normal conversation. Only another creature that knows thieves’ cant understands such messages. It takes four times longer to convey such a message than it does to speak the same idea plainly.
In addition, you understand a set of secret signs and symbols used to convey short, simple messages, such as whether an area is dangerous or the territory of a thieves’ guild, whether loot is nearby, or whether the people in an area are easy marks or will provide a safe house for thieves on the run.
Linguistically, Thieves' Cant is a cant (unsurprisingly) or argot. Its use in D&D is based on the real-life thieves' cant used in Britain originating in the 14th century and popularised in Elizabethan literature.
edited yesterday
V2Blast♦
33.6k5 gold badges123 silver badges210 bronze badges
33.6k5 gold badges123 silver badges210 bronze badges
answered 2 days ago
Dale MDale M
121k26 gold badges312 silver badges532 bronze badges
121k26 gold badges312 silver badges532 bronze badges
3
$begingroup$
The "secret signs and symbols" also have parallels with hobo signs.
$endgroup$
– Michael Seifert
2 days ago
add a comment |
3
$begingroup$
The "secret signs and symbols" also have parallels with hobo signs.
$endgroup$
– Michael Seifert
2 days ago
3
3
$begingroup$
The "secret signs and symbols" also have parallels with hobo signs.
$endgroup$
– Michael Seifert
2 days ago
$begingroup$
The "secret signs and symbols" also have parallels with hobo signs.
$endgroup$
– Michael Seifert
2 days ago
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Role-playing Games Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f153571%2fis-thieves-cant-a-language%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
$begingroup$
@PJRZ just because a question might have a similar answer (or part of an answer) to another question, doesn't make it a duplicate question. Asking what is the maximum damage of a Great Axe is not the same as asking which is better, a Great Axe vs a Great Sword, but both questions will have an answer with a similar calculation
$endgroup$
– illustro
2 days ago
$begingroup$
Let us continue this discussion in chat.
$endgroup$
– illustro
2 days ago
$begingroup$
related rpg.stackexchange.com/questions/132288
$endgroup$
– enkryptor
yesterday