Why does Chinuch confuse Parashat Nitzavim and Vayelech?Why no number of p'sukim for P'kude?Shelosha...
Can there be an atomic nucleus where there are more protons than neutrons?
Displaying characteristics of the Hero in a console game
Do businesses save their customers' credit card information until the payment is finalized?
A replacement for NextPermutation in Combinatorica
"Distance" vs "a distance"
How should I tell a professor the answer to something he doesn't know?
What does the British parliament hope to achieve by requesting a third Brexit extension?
"inuendo" in a piano score
How many integers are there that are not divisible by any prime larger than 20 and not divisible by the square of any prime?
What do you call a document which has no content?
Is Time Machine also backing up my Windows data from Bootcamp?
Novel set in the future, children cannot change the class they are born into, one class is made uneducated by associating books with pain
Do you say "good game" after a game in which your opponent played poorly?
Boot directly into another kernel from running Linux without bootloader
Why does b+=(4,) work and b = b + (4,) doesn't work when b is a list?
Some interesting and elementary topics with connections to the representation theory?
"A tin of biscuits" vs "A biscuit tin"
Is it reasonable to ask candidates to create a profile on Google Scholar?
Is it now possible to undetectably cross the Arctic Ocean on ski/kayak?
Skewer removal without quick release
How to get the SMILES of all compounds on PubChem?
Dynamics m, r, s, and z. What do they mean?
Usefulness of Nash embedding theorem
Why is beatboxing called 「ヒューマンビートボックス」?
Why does Chinuch confuse Parashat Nitzavim and Vayelech?
Why no number of p'sukim for P'kude?Shelosha Vachamishim - mi yodeya?If a father has to carry his sons aveiros why not his mitzvos?Why is Vayelech read twice in a year?Discrepancy between Sefer HaMitzvos and Sefer Hachinuch'Nishbaati' or 'Nishbawti'Was Moses' original scroll used as a blueprint for all following scrolls?
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{
margin-bottom:0;
}
.everyonelovesstackoverflow{position:absolute;height:1px;width:1px;opacity:0;top:0;left:0;pointer-events:none;}
Why does [this edition of] Minchas Chinuch list the two Mitzvos of Parashat Vayelech under Parashat Nitzavim?
mitzvah vayelech hakhel sefer-hachinuch
add a comment
|
Why does [this edition of] Minchas Chinuch list the two Mitzvos of Parashat Vayelech under Parashat Nitzavim?
mitzvah vayelech hakhel sefer-hachinuch
add a comment
|
Why does [this edition of] Minchas Chinuch list the two Mitzvos of Parashat Vayelech under Parashat Nitzavim?
mitzvah vayelech hakhel sefer-hachinuch
Why does [this edition of] Minchas Chinuch list the two Mitzvos of Parashat Vayelech under Parashat Nitzavim?
mitzvah vayelech hakhel sefer-hachinuch
mitzvah vayelech hakhel sefer-hachinuch
edited 2 hours ago
mbloch
32.8k6 gold badges55 silver badges154 bronze badges
32.8k6 gold badges55 silver badges154 bronze badges
asked 8 hours ago
Al BerkoAl Berko
9,9022 gold badges10 silver badges39 bronze badges
9,9022 gold badges10 silver badges39 bronze badges
add a comment
|
add a comment
|
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
Parashat Vayelekh isn't formally a thing. There is Parashat Nitzavim, and in some years it is read over two weeks. When that happens some people have started calling the second half "Parashat Vayelekh" after its incipit. But it's not traditionally part of the count of official sections.
This follows from the traditional count of 53 sections in the Babylonian annual Torah cycle (Zohar, Saadya Gaon and Rambam, Tanya Rabbati, Machzor Vitri among others) and the traditional count of 70 verses in this section (and no marker for a new section at "Vayelekh" in the Aleppo Codex or the Leningrad Codex) etc.
Historically, there are other sections (eg. Mishpatim or Chukkat) that have been split over multiple weeks in different communities under specific circumstances, so this is not an unheard of phenomenon.
What's the difference between two parshas sometimes read together and one parsha sometimes split in two? Probably nothing but tradition, perhaps dating from a time when Vezot Haberakha wasn't read on Shmini Atzeret and there were indeed a maximum of 53 Shabbatot in the year.
– Double AA♦
8 hours ago
add a comment
|
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Parashat Vayelekh isn't formally a thing. There is Parashat Nitzavim, and in some years it is read over two weeks. When that happens some people have started calling the second half "Parashat Vayelekh" after its incipit. But it's not traditionally part of the count of official sections.
This follows from the traditional count of 53 sections in the Babylonian annual Torah cycle (Zohar, Saadya Gaon and Rambam, Tanya Rabbati, Machzor Vitri among others) and the traditional count of 70 verses in this section (and no marker for a new section at "Vayelekh" in the Aleppo Codex or the Leningrad Codex) etc.
Historically, there are other sections (eg. Mishpatim or Chukkat) that have been split over multiple weeks in different communities under specific circumstances, so this is not an unheard of phenomenon.
What's the difference between two parshas sometimes read together and one parsha sometimes split in two? Probably nothing but tradition, perhaps dating from a time when Vezot Haberakha wasn't read on Shmini Atzeret and there were indeed a maximum of 53 Shabbatot in the year.
– Double AA♦
8 hours ago
add a comment
|
Parashat Vayelekh isn't formally a thing. There is Parashat Nitzavim, and in some years it is read over two weeks. When that happens some people have started calling the second half "Parashat Vayelekh" after its incipit. But it's not traditionally part of the count of official sections.
This follows from the traditional count of 53 sections in the Babylonian annual Torah cycle (Zohar, Saadya Gaon and Rambam, Tanya Rabbati, Machzor Vitri among others) and the traditional count of 70 verses in this section (and no marker for a new section at "Vayelekh" in the Aleppo Codex or the Leningrad Codex) etc.
Historically, there are other sections (eg. Mishpatim or Chukkat) that have been split over multiple weeks in different communities under specific circumstances, so this is not an unheard of phenomenon.
What's the difference between two parshas sometimes read together and one parsha sometimes split in two? Probably nothing but tradition, perhaps dating from a time when Vezot Haberakha wasn't read on Shmini Atzeret and there were indeed a maximum of 53 Shabbatot in the year.
– Double AA♦
8 hours ago
add a comment
|
Parashat Vayelekh isn't formally a thing. There is Parashat Nitzavim, and in some years it is read over two weeks. When that happens some people have started calling the second half "Parashat Vayelekh" after its incipit. But it's not traditionally part of the count of official sections.
This follows from the traditional count of 53 sections in the Babylonian annual Torah cycle (Zohar, Saadya Gaon and Rambam, Tanya Rabbati, Machzor Vitri among others) and the traditional count of 70 verses in this section (and no marker for a new section at "Vayelekh" in the Aleppo Codex or the Leningrad Codex) etc.
Historically, there are other sections (eg. Mishpatim or Chukkat) that have been split over multiple weeks in different communities under specific circumstances, so this is not an unheard of phenomenon.
Parashat Vayelekh isn't formally a thing. There is Parashat Nitzavim, and in some years it is read over two weeks. When that happens some people have started calling the second half "Parashat Vayelekh" after its incipit. But it's not traditionally part of the count of official sections.
This follows from the traditional count of 53 sections in the Babylonian annual Torah cycle (Zohar, Saadya Gaon and Rambam, Tanya Rabbati, Machzor Vitri among others) and the traditional count of 70 verses in this section (and no marker for a new section at "Vayelekh" in the Aleppo Codex or the Leningrad Codex) etc.
Historically, there are other sections (eg. Mishpatim or Chukkat) that have been split over multiple weeks in different communities under specific circumstances, so this is not an unheard of phenomenon.
edited 6 hours ago
answered 8 hours ago
Double AA♦Double AA
82.3k6 gold badges207 silver badges463 bronze badges
82.3k6 gold badges207 silver badges463 bronze badges
What's the difference between two parshas sometimes read together and one parsha sometimes split in two? Probably nothing but tradition, perhaps dating from a time when Vezot Haberakha wasn't read on Shmini Atzeret and there were indeed a maximum of 53 Shabbatot in the year.
– Double AA♦
8 hours ago
add a comment
|
What's the difference between two parshas sometimes read together and one parsha sometimes split in two? Probably nothing but tradition, perhaps dating from a time when Vezot Haberakha wasn't read on Shmini Atzeret and there were indeed a maximum of 53 Shabbatot in the year.
– Double AA♦
8 hours ago
What's the difference between two parshas sometimes read together and one parsha sometimes split in two? Probably nothing but tradition, perhaps dating from a time when Vezot Haberakha wasn't read on Shmini Atzeret and there were indeed a maximum of 53 Shabbatot in the year.
– Double AA♦
8 hours ago
What's the difference between two parshas sometimes read together and one parsha sometimes split in two? Probably nothing but tradition, perhaps dating from a time when Vezot Haberakha wasn't read on Shmini Atzeret and there were indeed a maximum of 53 Shabbatot in the year.
– Double AA♦
8 hours ago
add a comment
|